Fiscal Year: 2011-12
College of the Redwoods
Program Review Committee Summary
As per its Mission, the Program Review Committee reviews Annual and Comprehensive Program Reviews to provide the foundation upon which the district
develops, identifies, and documents the direction of the prioritization of planning. Our objective is to provide an evaluative Executive Summary of each
program’s review for authors, Integrated Planning Committees, and the District.
Program Review Subject Area:
Addiction Studies
Program Review Authors:
Stuart Altschuler, Mike Goldsby, Jim Home, Greg Westbrook, (Rachel Anderson, Anita Janis)
Area Administrator:
Rachel Anderson
Performance Indicators for Instructional Programs
1. Program Access/Demand
Enrollment Trends
FTES (Comprehensive reviews
Satisfactory
X
Job Availability (based on
labor market data)
Advisory Committee
Activities*
2. Program Resources
Full-time/Part-time FTE Ratio
X
X
X
Funding/Grant support
3. Program
Efficiency/Productivity
Course Success
SLO assessment Schedule
PLO assessment Schedule
GE assessment
Other:
Committee Comments
Significant increase in fill rates
N/A
(Comprehensive reviews only)
Program/Course Outcomes
Course Retention
NA
X
only)
Fill Rate (at Census)
Unsatisfactory
No external GE budget for this program
X
There are four less sections this year than last year; program is increasing number of
students with less sections
X
X
Upper level classes tend to have fewer students
Deviation to one class, ADCT 10; Kudos to the Associate faculty who assessed and are
addressing issues; There seems to be a percentage decrease of success in ADCT 11
and 12
X
X
X
There is continuing concern among associate faculty about the success of this program without a full-time faculty member.
Associate Faculty have supported this program and written all updated curriculum. PRC would like more information
regarding student success at the basic skills level and what avenues might be open to help students.
Process:
Completed Executive Summary forms will be sent to program review authors, who will have two weeks to provide feedback and corrections on errors of fact and/interpretation.
PRC will forward the summaries and author responses (if available) to the appropriate integrated planning committee, EMC and the IEC. Adopted by PRC April 29, 2011
Summary
PRC Recommendations
Author Comments
Process:
Completed Executive Summary forms will be sent to program review authors, who will have two weeks to provide feedback and corrections on errors of fact and/interpretation.
PRC will forward the summaries and author responses (if available) to the appropriate integrated planning committee, EMC and the IEC.
Adopted by PRC April 29, 2011