Redwoods Community College District
Enrollment Management Committee (EMC)
Monday, November 1, 2010
Boardroom
MINUTES
PRESENT
Rachel Anderson, David Gonsalves (phone), Kathy Goodlive,
Utpal Goswami, Melissa Green, Sheila Hall, Anita Janis (phone),
Allen Keppner, Pam Kessler, Geisce Ly (phone), Michael Peterson,
Keith Snow-Flamer(Co-Chair), Bruce Wagner (Co-Chair)
MINUTES
Minutes from the October 18, 2010, EMC meeting were approved with
minor changes.
ACTION ITEMS
Task Force
Satisfaction
Survey and
Enrollment
Management Plan
Task Force
EMC Operating
Agreement
(Planning
Agenda)
DISCUSSION
ITEMS
Wait List
Recommendations
It was discussed that there’s a need to review the work completed over
the summer on the student satisfaction and enrollment management
action plans with the EMC membership.
Cheryl Tucker (chair), Melissa Green, Allen Keppner, and Pam Kessler
agreed to serve on the task force to review the two plans and confirm the
action plan items, delete items, add items missed, simplify the plans, and
assign timetables for completion. . The goal is to review and revise the
action plan within 30 days.
Volunteers were solicited to work on winnowing down the EMC
Operating Agreement, specifically the Planning Agenda section. Keith,
Bruce, Anita, and Barbara will serve on the task force.
The most recent draft of the Wait List Recommendations was presented
to the committee for review. There was lengthy discussion regarding
revisions and clarifications. The following suggestions were made:
 Add verbiage regarding the definition of “impacted courses.”
 Consider adjusting the wait list number according to class size and
format.
 Educate students on the use of the wait list.
 Populate webadvisor with more than one email address.
It was decided that Lorie will incorporate the suggested changes into the
Wait List Recommendation document and send it back to the committee
for verification of the revisions.
TLU Allocation
Process
There was discussion regarding the TLU planning process and it was
noted that the current process is flawed and there needs to be
improvement for next year. TLU allocations for next year cannot be
determined until the 2011/12 preliminary budget is developed. It was
stated that there is a need for district-wide discussion regarding
identification of institutional priorities and where we are going as an
institution.
FTES Projection
Keith stated that the latest update from the Chancellor’s office reports
that the District can expect approximately $600,000 in state funds for the
2010/11 year. The current target number is 5201 resident FTES. In
December EMC will begin working on FTES projections for next year.
These projections will be forward to the Budget Planning Committee
(BPC) in preparation of the development of the Preliminary Budget for
next year.
Tabled Discussion
Items
4.3 Strategies for Summer Schedule
4.5 EM Scorecard
REPORTS
Tabled Reports
ADJOURN
SUBMITTED
BY
5.1 Multiple Measures
5.2 IR Status
5.3 101 Corridor Survey
.
The meeting was adjourned at 2:30 p.m.
lw