1.0
PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE
PROPOSED ACTION
1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED
ACTION
1.1 INTRODUCTION
This environmental assessment (EA) evaluates the potential environmental impacts of a proposed U.S.
Department of the Air Force (Air Force) force structure action at Moody Air Force Base (AFB), Georgia.
The proposed action would:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Establish Joint Primary Pilot Training (JPPT) and beddown the associated Joint Primary Aircraft
Training System (JPATS) at Moody AFB. This would add a total of 49 T-6A aircraft and 444
manpower authorizations to Moody AFB;
Renovate existing facilities and construct new facilities at Moody AFB to accommodate JPATS
squadron operations, classroom training activities, and maintenance activities for T-6A aircraft;
Conduct parasail training operations at Bemiss Field in conjunction with the JPPT course;
Conduct sortie-operations by T-6A aircraft within the Moody 1 Military Operations Area (MOA),
Moody 3 MOA, Live Oak MOA, Low Altitude Tactical Navigation (LATN) area, and along two
military training routes (MTRs): Visual Route 1065 (VR-1065) and VR-1066;
Establish mutual use agreements with five civilian airfields in the vicinity of Moody AFB for the
purposes of T-6A transition training, including the practice of multiple overhead patterns,
emergency landing patterns, and instrument approaches;
Change the airspace utilization of Moody 2 North and South MOAs by T-38 aircraft associated
with the existing Introduction to Fighter Fundamentals (IFF) pilot training program; and
Assign 10 T-38 aircraft as Backup Aircraft Inventory (BAI), increasing the total number of T-38
aircraft at Moody AFB to 67. No operational changes would occur.
This EA has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA); Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations; and Air Force Instruction (AFI) 32-7061,
The Environmental Impact Analysis Process (Air Force 1995c).
1.2 BACKGROUND
1.2.1
Moody AFB
Moody AFB is located in south-central Georgia 10 miles northeast of the City of Valdosta on 11,402
acres of federally owned land in Lowndes and Lanier counties (Figure 1.2-1). The installation consists of
the main base (5,039 acres), Grand Bay Range (5,874 acres), and the Grassy Pond Recreation Area annex
(489 acres) which is located 25 miles southwest of the main base. Moody AFB is currently the home to
the 347th Wing (347 WG), which has four primary groups. The 347th Operations Group is the primary
flying organization, with three tactical fighter squadrons (68th Fighter Squadron [68 FS], 69 FS, and 70
FS) and two Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR) Squadrons (41st Rescue Squadron [41 RQS] and 71
RQS). The other three groups are the 347th Logistics Group, 347th Support Group, and 347th Medical
Group, which maintain all other base functions.
1.0 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action
1-1
EMMANUEL
HOUSTON
TN
BLECKLEY
CHANDLER
LAURENS
EFFINGHAM
BULLOCH
NC
MACON
SC
DOOLY
STEWART
MONTGOMERY
DODGE
Georgia
AL
280
MOODY
AFB WEBSTER
EVANS
221
WHEELER
★
16
PULASKI
75
TOMBS
BRYAN
SUMTER
G
Atlantic
Ocean
E
O
R
CRISP
G
I
A
TATTNALL
TELFAIR
WILCOX
LIBERTY
RANDOLPH
Florida
TERRELL
JEFF DAVIS
LEE
BEN HILL
Gulf of
Mexico
APPLING
LONG
TURNER
82
Douglas
IRWIN
Albany
CALHOUN
DOUGHERTY
EARLY
WAYNE
BACON
COFFEE
WORTH
MCINTOSH
TIFT
PIERCE
BERRIEN
BAKER
319
COOK
Waycross
221
Nashville
GLYNN
84
19
MITCHELL
MILLER
BRANTLEY
Moody
Adel AFB
COLQUITT
WARE
Lakeland
LANIER
SEMINOLE
CAMDEN
CHARLETON
CLINCH
84
95
GRADY
DECATUR
Valdosta
THOMAS
441
BROOKS
JACKSON
LOWNDES
ECHOLS
WARE
NASSAU
GADSEN
C
A
L
H
O
U
N
LEON
HAMILTON
MADISON
TALLAHASSEE
JEFFERSON
DUVAL
BAKER
LIBERTY
Jacksonville
10
SUWANNEE
COLUMBIA
WAKULLA
TAYLOR
UNION
LA FAYETTE
CLAY
BRADFORD
FRANKLIN
ALACHUA
GILCHRIST
F
L
O
ST.
JOHNS
R
I
D
A
DIXIE
PUTNAM
Gainesville
FLAGLER
Gulf
of
Mexico
LEVY
Ocala
SEMINOLE
MARION
75
LAKE
CITRUS
SUMTER
LEGEND
State Capitol
441
U.S. Highway
Statute Miles
0
Selected Cities and Towns
27
State Boundary
0
County Boundary
75
Location of Moody AFB, Georgia
1-2
27
Nautical Miles
Interstate Highway
Figure 1.2-1
1.0 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action
T-6A Beddown EA
Final
Numerous force structure changes have occurred over the years at Moody AFB. The base’s primary
mission in the 1950s was to meet the requirements of the Air Force Pilot Instrument School and
Instrument Flying School. Mission aircraft were the F-89 Scorpion, F-94 Starfire, and F-86 Sabre. The
Instrument Pilot Instructor School operated at Moody until 1958 when it was moved to Texas. At that
time Moody came under the Air Training Command and was designated the 3550th Pilot Training Wing.
In 1975, the 347th Tactical Fighter Wing (347 TFW) was activated as the host unit at Moody AFB. In that
same year, the 347 TFW began to transition from T-37 and T-38 aircraft to F-4E aircraft. In 1987, the
347 TFW began the conversion from F-4s to the F-16. In 1991, the 347 TFW lost the “Tactical”
designation and became the 347th Fighter Wing (347 FW). In 1994, a decision was made to beddown
HC-130 and A/OA-10 aircraft, making Moody AFB one of three composite wings in the Air Force; at
that time, the 347 FW was redesignated the 347 WG.
A decision was made in 1996 to move two CSAR squadrons of six HH-60 helicopters (41 RQS) and nine
HC-130 air refueling aircraft (71 RQS) from Patrick AFB, Florida, to Moody AFB. This realignment of
geographically separated units reduced manpower requirements, placed the affected units under a single
commander, and improved deployability in support of the Air Combat Command (ACC) mission (Air
Force 1996c).
In September 1998, in accordance with Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) recommendations, the 41
RQS was assigned an additional 6 HH-60 aircraft (bringing the Primary Aircraft Inventory [PAI] to 14
HH-60s) (Air Force 1998a). At the same time, the decision was made to inactivate the 70 FS and relocate
the 24 assigned A/OA-10 aircraft to other locations. This action has been partially fulfilled and will be
complete by 1 October 2000. In addition, a decision was made to establish an IFF pilot training program
with 57 PAI T-38 aircraft (includes 54 Primary Aircraft Authorization [PAA] aircraft and 3 Attrition
Reserve aircraft). This action will begin in fiscal year 2000 (FY00) and be complete by FY01 (Air Force
1998a).
Most recently, the Air Force, in an effort to streamline fighter squadron operations, made a decision to
deactivate the 68 FS and 69 FS and relocate the 36 F-16 PAI aircraft and 1,259 military manpower
authorizations associated with the aircraft to other locations. This action will begin in first quarter of
FY01 (FY01/1) and be complete by FY01/2 (Air Force 1999a).
1.2.2
Joint Primary Pilot Training Course Characteristics
There are two courses in the Air Force in which primary pilot training is conducted: one for both Air
Force and U.S. Department of the Navy (Navy) students and the other solely for Air Force students. Air
Education and Training Command (AETC) bases that conduct training for both Navy and Air Force
students implement the JPPT course. Air Force only training is conducted through the Specialized
Undergraduate Pilot Training (SUPT) course. Both courses are configured the same with the exception of
some Navy elements (e.g., swim test) that are part of the JPPT course. Currently, Vance AFB, Oklahoma
conducts JPPT training; Laughlin AFB, Texas and Columbus AFB, Mississippi conduct SUPT (Air Force
1999e).
The JPPT course is designed to qualify undergraduate pilots for advanced undergraduate pilot training
and to prepare them for future responsibilities as military officers and leaders. To accomplish these
requirements, three areas of instruction are presented: 1) flying training, 2) ground or academic training,
and 3) officer development training.
1.0 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action
1-3
T-6A Beddown EA
Final
Flying training teaches the principles and techniques used in operating advanced aircraft. This includes
the actual flying of the aircraft, formation flying, pattern training, in-flight emergency procedures,
navigation, instrument flying, pre-flight preparations, and post-flight inspections. Ground (or academic)
training supplements and reinforces flying training; it includes lessons in weather, aerodynamics, flight
physiology, instruments, navigation, water and land survival, aircraft systems (e.g., communications, fuel,
electrical, and hydraulic), and physical training. Officer training emphasizes leadership skills, officer
qualities, and the understanding of the military pilot as a supervisor and officer (AETC and Chief of
Naval Air Training 1998).
1.3 PURPOSE AND NEED
The purpose of the proposed action is to establish a JPPT program at Moody AFB. The Air Force is
currently experiencing a shortage of pilots due to a higher than expected pilot attrition and separation rate.
To meet this higher than expected loss of Air Force pilots, the Air Force is increasing the number of
student pilots entering the SUPT and JPPT programs. Since existing AETC installations are at maximum
capacity for this pilot training program, other Air Force installations must be considered for pilot training.
1.4 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
A variety of laws, regulations, executive orders (EOs), and other types of requirements apply to federal
actions and form the basis of the analysis presented in this EA. NEPA requires federal agencies to
consider potential environmental consequences of proposed actions and enhance the environment through
well-informed federal decisions. CEQ was established under NEPA to implement and oversee federal
policy in this process. Other related federal level compliance documents include AFI 32-7061 (Air Force
1995c), Endangered Species Act, and EO 11514, Protection and Enhancement of Environmental Quality.
1.5 ORGANIZATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
This EA assesses the impacts of the proposed action and the no-action alternative on potentially affected
environmental resource areas. Chapter 1.0 (this chapter) provides background information relevant to the
proposed action and discusses its purpose and need. Chapter 2.0 describes the proposed action and
alternative. Chapter 3.0 describes the baseline conditions (i.e., the conditions against which the potential
impacts of the proposed action or alternative are measured) for each of the resource areas, while Chapter
4.0 describes environmental impacts of the proposed action or alternative on these resources. Chapter 5.0
includes an analysis of potential cumulative impacts associated with the proposed action and other past,
present, and reasonably foreseeable projects; and Chapter 6.0 describes any irreversible or irretrievable
(permanent) commitments of resources. Chapter 7.0 contains references used for the preparation of this
EA, including correspondence. Chapter 8.0 lists persons contacted, and Chapter 9.0 lists the preparers.
Appendices, as listed in the Table of Contents, follow Chapter 9.0.
1-4
1.0 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action