D N FY 2010 P B

advertisement
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
FY 2010 PRESIDENT’S BUDGET
7 May 2009
Rear Admiral J. T. Blake
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Budget
1
Final
1
Supporting The National Defense Strategy
• A full spectrum force
• Regionally concentrated, credible combat power • Committed to support people and resources of the Navy‐Marine Corps team
• Sensible and responsive procurement
• Focus on: ‐ Opportunities – not threats
‐
Optimism ‐ not fear
‐ Confidence ‐ not doubt
Security, Stability, Seapower
2
Final
2
Department of the Navy Presence
Navy
‐ 332,289 active strength
‐ 6,750 activated reservists ‐ 125 ships underway – 44% (away from homeport)
‐ 103 ships deployed – 36%
• Three Carrier Strike Groups
• Three Expeditionary Strike Groups
‐ 52,166 underway on deployment ‐ 13,569 Boots on Ground •10,743 Individual Augmentees
Marine Corps
‐ 200,931 active strength
‐ 8,005 activated reservists
‐ 28,597 on deployment/forward deployed • 16,585 Iraq
• 5,686 Afghanistan
• 2,784 Other CENTCOM
• 2,754 PACOM
• 787 All others
(data as of 6 May 2009)
3
Final
3
Department of the Navy Budget Trends
Total Funding
Baseline Funding
FY07
$151.7
$127.2
FY08
$164.8
$139.2
FY09
$163.8
$146.7
FY10
$171.7
$156.4
180
160
25.7
15.3
24.5
140
Billions of Dollars
8.7
7.3
120
59.5
63.9
69.1
51.9
100
80
60
41.3
43.0
37.3
40.4
38.0
39.6
41.5
44.3
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
40
20
0
MilPers
O&M
Investment
Supplemental/Transfers
OCO Request
*Numbers may not add due to rounding
4
Final
4
FY 2010 Budget Breakdown (in billions)
MilPers: $44.3B
Procurement: $44.8B
Basic Pays
Housing Allowance
Retired Pay Accrual
Health Accrual
Reserve Personnel
Special Pays
Subsistence
Allowances
Other $17.6
$6.7 $5.7 $3.3
$2.6
$2.4
$2.0 $1.0 $3.0
Ships
$14.9 Weapons Procurement
$3.5
Marine Corps Procurement
$1.6
Ammunition Procurement
$0.8
Other Navy Procurement
$5.7
Balanced Investment
FY10: $156.4B
O&M: $42.9B
Prevail in Current Conflicts $18.4
$
Navy Strength 324,400
Marine Corps 202,100
Ship Ops
Base Support
Aviation Ops Marine Corps O&M Combat/Weapons Support
Service Wide Support
Training and Education
Reserve O&M
Environmental Restoration
Aircraft
$9.9
$6.9
$5.7
$5.5
$5.1
$5.0 $2.9
$1.5
$0.3
R&D: $19.3B
Infrastructure: $5.1B
MILCON
BRAC
Family Housing
$3.8
$0.8 $0.5
Sustaining the Institution
Basic Research
Applied Research Advance Tech Dev
Adv Component Dev System Dev & Demo Management Support Ops Systems Dev $0.6
$0.6
$0.7 $4.2
$8.0
$1.0
$4.3
Maintaining the Edge
5
*Numbers may not add due to rounding
Final
5
Military Personnel and End Strength
Active Navy Strength
370,000
365,900
PB 2005
Strength
Right size the force
357,400
360,000
350,000
Marine Corps Growing the Force
PB 2006
PB 2007
‐
345,300
PB 2008
340,000
330,000
‐ Growth is funded in baseline
337,000
PB 2010
PB 2009
FY 2010 end strength 202,100
‐ 3 balanced globally sourced MEFs
328,800
• Reduces stress on force
324,200
323,700
320,000
End
FY05
End
FY06
End
FY07
End
FY08
End
FY09
End
FY10
205,000
198,000
‐ Reaching desired end state
191,000
‐ FY 2010 end strength 328,800
•4,400 temporary IA’s funded with contingency efforts
‐ Targeted retention
‐ Continued active/reserve integration ‐ Reverse medical civsubs (NDAA)
Strength
Stabilizing the Force
184,000
177,000
170,000
FY06
FY07
Initial Plan
FY08
Current Plan
FY09
08 supp
FY10
09 OCO
Active Marine Corps Strength
6
Final
6
Civilian Personnel
FTEs
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
188,994
194,248
195,643
15,728
16,817
17,032
73,318
74,056
71,805
99,948
103,375
106,806
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs)
200,000
150,000
Change
+1,395 100,000
50,000
0
O&M
NWCF
Other
FY 2010 Significant Changes (FTEs):
‐ In‐sourcing: +1,204
‐ Acquisition Workforce: +1,428 (includes 685 in‐sourcing)
7
Final
7
Readiness
Ship Operations
Flying Hour Operation
Marine Corps Operations
58 days/qtr deployed
Navy T‐Rating 2.5
3 Active Marine Expeditionary Forces (MEF) & 27 Active Infantry Battalions
3.5
5.0
0.7
0.6
3.4
3.0
1.3
4.0
1.1
3.0
Billions of D ollars
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Marine Corps T‐Rating 2.0
Billions of Dollars
Billions of Dollars
24 days/qtr non‐deployed
3.0
2.0
3.5
3.8
1.0
FY10
FY09
100% of PAA goal for deployed squadrons, 4.1
4.3
1.0
0.0
FY09
FY10
0.2
0.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
1.1
0.4
1.1
Billions of Dollars
2.0
FY09
FY10
12.0
1.2
Billions of D ollars
B illio n s o f D o lla rs
3.0
0.7
93% of facility maintenance model, BOS at capability levels 2/3
97% for non‐deployed squadrons
1.4
0.4
0.7
Base Support
96% of projected maintenance funded
4.0
2.1
1.0
FY10
Aircraft Depot Maintenance
1.0
2.5
1.5
0.0
Ship Depot Maintenance
5.0
2.0
0.5
0.0
FY09
2.5
10.0
0.8
0.5
8.0
3.0
3.0
6.9
7.2
FY09
FY10
6.0
4.0
0.2
2.0
0.0
0.0
FY09
USN
FY10
USMC
OCO
8
Final
8
Shipbuilding Quantities
FY08
FY09
FY10
CVN 21
1
0
0
SSN 774
1
1
1
DDG 1000
0
1
1
0
DDG 51
0
0
0
1
LCS
0
2
3
LPD 17
1
1
0
MPF‐A
0
0
1
0
MPF T‐AKE
0
2
0
2
MPF MLP
0
0
1
0
JHSV
0
1
1
New Construction
3
8
8
8
9
Final
9
Aviation Quantities
FY08
FY09
F‐35B (STOVL JSF)
6
7
14
F‐35C (CV JSF)
0
0
4
F/A‐18E/F
24
23
18
EA‐18G
18
22
22
MV‐22B
21
30
30
AH‐1Z/UH‐1Y
15
16
28
MH‐60S
18
18
18
MH‐60R
26
31
27
24
E‐2D AHE
3
2
3
2
KC‐130J
4
2
2
0
C‐40A
0
2
0
1
44
44
44
38
VH‐71
0
0
3
0
P‐8A (MMA)
0
0
6
MQ‐8B (VTUAV)
3
3
6
182
200
225
T‐6A/B(JPATS)
TOTAL
FY10
16
9
5
203
10
Final
10
Missiles and Munitions Quantities
FY08
FY09
FY10
Standard Missile
75
70
62
RAM
ESSM
90
79
90
75
90
50
Trident II
12
24
24
Lightweight Torpedoes
133
120
120
Heavyweight Torpedoes
Tomahawk
84
496
67
207
85
196
AIM‐9X
170
144
161
52
57
79
JSOW
370
496
430
Hellfire
AARGM
991
26
1,068
6
818
36
APKWS
0
0
325
TOTAL
2,578
2,424
2,476
AMRAAM
11
Final
11
Ground Equipment Quantities
Baseline
Marine Corps Ground Equipment
LW155
HMMWV (ECV)
LVSR
ITV
Overseas Contingency Operations
Marine Corps Ground Equipment
MRAP
LW155
HMMWV (ECV)
LVSR
FY08
88
1,040
38
0
FY08
FY09
0
7
537
25
FY09
FY10
0
52
496
48
FY10
561
12
251
0
0
24
817
0
0
18
933
85
66
238
0
31
0
85
Navy Ground Equipment
MRAP
HMMWV (ECV)
12
Final
12
R&D Investment
FY09
Major Systems $M
$19.6B
$19.3B
2.0
1.0
1.8
1.0
Joint Strike Fighter (F‐35)
1,745
1,741
MMA (P‐8A)
1,124
1,179
TUAV/Endurance UAV
762
795
CH‐53K
565
572
E‐2D AHE
482
365
68
90
VH‐71
832
85
EA‐18G
129
55
DDG‐1000
448
539
15
495
LCS
368
361
CG(X)
248
340
CVN 21
292
296
Virginia Class SSN
190
155
JTRS
845
876
C4I
909
712
EFV
255
293
MV‐22B
10
16.6
16.4
Shipbuilding
Billions of Dollars
15
Aviation 20
5
0
FY09
Development
FY10
Management Science and Technology
FY10
SSBN(X)
13
*Numbers may not add due to rounding
Final
13
Military Construction, BRAC, & Family Housing
Military Construction
$4,000
226
555
$3,500
$3,000
$2,500
2,740
2,116
$2,000
$1,500
Family Housing
$1,000
1,274
$500
1,087
Budget: $759 million $515 million
$0
$800
FY09
Navy
FY10
USMC
BRAC Construction
FY2009 American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act
• Total - $1,221M
ƒ MILCON - $280M
ƒ FSRM -
$866M
ƒ R&D -
$75M
$600
Millions of Dollars
Millions of Dollars
$4,500
376
$400
$200
368
383
147
$0
FY09
FY10
FHOPS
376
368
FHCON
383
147
14
Final
14
Military Construction
4
FY10 Significant Efforts Program
Grow‐the‐Force
$ Billions
3
Guam
$ M
1,909
Guam
378
Replace Aging Facilities
317
Quality‐of‐Life
274
BRACON
M arine Corps
2
1
Nav y
0
FY02
FY03
FY04
FY05
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
15
Final
15
Overseas Contingency Operations Funding
Department of the Navy Overseas Contingency Operations Dollars in millions
FY 2008 FY 2009 Appropriated
Request
FY 2009 FY 2009 Bridge Remaining Received
Request
FY 2010 Request
Military Personnel
1,380
1,469
75
1,394
1,215
Operations
Procurement
R&D
6,573
5,362
385
5,958
1,067
244
3,543
28
113
2,415
1,039
131
6,287
1,525
107
125
263
105
0
0
0
105
0
0
0
USN Subtotal
14,088
8,843
3,759
5,084
9,134
Military Personnel
Operations
1,813
4,639
1,504
4,069
55
2,947
1,449
1,122
702
3,789
Procurement
R&D
4,576
194
2,479
9
565
0
1,914
9
1,658
0
231
134
0
134
0
USMC Subtotal
11,453
8,195
3,567
4,628
6,149
DON Grand Total 25,541
17,038
7,326
9,712
15,283
Military Construction
Other
Military Construction
16
Final
16
Defining Principle ‐ Balance
… balance in three areas
• prevail in current conflicts…
• preparing for other contingencies …
• maintaining the United States' existing
conventional and strategic technological
edge against other military forces
• Institutionalize unconventional thinking
• Conventional threats in perspective
• Sustaining the institution
Robert M. Gates, SECDEF
Foreign Affairs, January/February 2009
17
Final
17
Download