Earthquake hazards Ground Rupture Alaskan pipe after the Denali quake ruptured through Ground rupture from the M8.1 2001 Tibet earthquake Earthquake hazards (cont.) Shaking Wave amplitude Wave frequency Duration of shaking Earthquake hazards (cont) Liquefaction Saturated sand loses strength upon shaking 1964 Nigata Japan Tsunami Wave wavelength ocean waves that can travel vast distances 2004 Sumatra earthquake Sumatra Earthquake tsunami QuickTime™ and a Sorenson Video decompressor are needed to see this picture. QuickTime™ and a Video decompressor are needed to see this picture. Seismic Hazard of MA Cape Ann Earthquake 1755 Woodcut illustration depicting damage in Boston from the earthquake Hazard vs risk 1989 Macquarie Ridge, New Zealand M 8.3 No losses 1960 Agadir, Morocco M 5.5 12,000 deaths Earthquake Risk Risk = hazard x vulnerability The amount of damage and numbers of earthquake related deaths do not correlate to magnitude of the earthquake. Products of hazard assessment Active fault map Historical seismicity Earthquake likelihood 3D models assess seismic hazard in Los Angeles, CA SCEC Community Fault Model Acceptable Risk Level of acceptable risk depends on the structure Cannot design for maximum earthquake with low probability Social question How would you mitigate damages from…. Ground Rupture Liquefaction Ground Shaking Tsunami Ground Rupture Avoid construction Relocate sensitive facilities Implement low use facilities Playing fields Green space Portola Valley California Liquefaction Recognize liquefaction potential In-situ remediation Avoid construction in liquefaction prone areas Tsunami mitigation Early warning system Broadcast signal to beaches after a major earthquake anywhere in the ocean basin Saftey guidelines Go to high ground Climb a tree Ground Shaking Recognize the degree of probable ground shaking in the area Improve construction methods to accommodate shaking without collapse