table of contents - Documents & Reports

advertisement
E1138 v. 7
Cross River State
Water Board Limited
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma
Water Distribution & Supply
Schemes Project
ENVIRONMENTAL &
SOCIAL IMPACT
ASSESSMENT
Final Report
January 2012
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
PREPARED BY:
EARTHGUARDS LIMITED:
Sustainable Development Consultants
SUITE 45 GOD’S OWN PLAZA
4 TAKUM CLOSE (BEHIND UNITY HOUSE)
AREA 11, GARKI
ABUJA
earthguards@gmail.com
+234-9-8707469; +234-803-3740948
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
LIST OF ACRONYMS
EA
EIA
ESIA
ESMF
ESMP
EPAD
CRSWBL
EMP
FCT
FEPA
FGDs
FGN
FM
FMEnv
FMAWR
FPIU
HSE
IDA
LGA
M&E
NUWSRP
NUWSRP1
NUWSRP2
NWRP
OP/BP
PAD
PCU
PHCN
PIU
PMU
PRA
PPP
PSP
RAP
ROW
RPF
SMWR
SPIU
SSI
SWAs
TOR
WHO
WTP
Earthguards Limited:
Environmental Assessment
Environmental Impact Assessment
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Environmental and Social Management Framework
Environmental and Social Management Plan
Environmental Protection and Assessment Department
Cross River State Water Board Limited
Environmental Management Plan
Federal Capital Territory
Federal Environmental Protection Agency
Focus Group Discussions
Federal Government of Nigeria
Frequency Modulation
Federal Ministry of Environment
Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources
Federal Project Implementation Unit
Health, Safety and Environment
International Development Association
Local Government Authority
Monitoring and Evaluation
National Urban Water Sector Reform Project
First National Urban Water Sector Reform Project
Second National Urban Water Sector Reform Project
National Water Rehabilitation Project
Operation Policy/Bank Policy
Project Appraisal Document
Project Coordination Unit
Power Holding Company of Nigeria
Project Implementation Unit
Project Management Unit
Participatory Rural Appraisal
Public-Private Partnership
Private Sector Partner or Private Sector Participation
Resettlement Action Plan
Right of Way
Resettlement Policy Framework
State Ministry of Water Resources
State Project Implementation Unit
Semi Structured Interviewed
State Water Agencies
Terms of Reference
World Health Organization
Willingness to Pay
Sustainable Development Consultants
ii
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
BOD
Ca
Cd
CO
COD
Cr
Cu
dBA
DO
ESP
Fe
HC
Hg
HB
HF
HUB
K
Mg
N
Ni
NO2
NO3
NTU
P
Pb
pH
PO4
SO2
SPM
TDS
TOM
TSS
V
Zn
Earthguards Limited:
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
Calcium
Cadmium
Carbon Monoxide
Chemical Oxygen Demand
Chromium
Copper
Decibel
Dissolved Oxygen
Exchange Sodium Percentage
Iron
Hydrocarbon
Mercury
Heterotrophic Bacteria
Heterotrophic Fungi
Hydrocarbon Utilizing Bacteria
Potassium
Magnesium
Nitrogen
Nickel
Nitrogen Dioxide
Nitrate
Nephelometric Turbidity Units
Phosphate
Lead
Hydrogen ion concentration
Phosphate
Sulphur Dioxide
Suspended Particulate Matter
Total Dissolved Solids
Total Organic Matter
Total Suspended Solids
Vanadium
Zinc
Sustainable Development Consultants
iii
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
UNIT OF MEASUREMENTS
%
uS/cm
atm
cfu/ml
cm
dBA
ft
g
g/l
g/kg
meq/100g
in
km
m
m/s
m2
m3
mg/kg
mg/l
mV
mg/m3
ml
mm
mm/hr
mS/cm
NTU
oC
ppm
ppt
s
ton
Earthguards Limited:
Percentage
MicroSiemens per centimetre
Atmosphere
Colony forming unit per millimetre
centimeter
Measures sound or noise level
Feet
grammes
Grammes per litre
Grammes per kilogramme
Milliequivalent per 100 gramme
inches
Kilometre
Metre
metre per second
metre square
metre cube
milligram per kilogramme
milligram per litre
millivolt
milligram per metre cubic
millilitre
millimetre
millimetre per hour
milliSiemens per centimetre
Nephelometric Turbidity Units
Degrees Celcius
parts per million
parts per thousand
second
tonne
Sustainable Development Consultants
iv
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................... II
GLOSSARY OF TERMS ................................................................................................. III
UNIT OF MEASUREMENTS ........................................................................................ IV
TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................. V
LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................ VII
LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................... VIII
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... IX
1
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................................. 1
OBJECTIVES OF THE ESIA ............................................................................................................................................. 1
SCOPE OF WORK .............................................................................................................................................................. 2
ESIA PROCESS ............................................................................................................................................................... 3
STUDY APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................. 4
1.5.1
Organization and Planning ................................................................................................................... 4
1.5.2
Environmental Study ........................................................................................................................... 5
1.5.3
Social, Economic and Health Study ........................................................................................................ 6
1.6 PROJECT CLASSIFICATION ............................................................................................................................................. 6
2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................... 8
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
PROJECT RATIONALE ..................................................................................................................................................... 8
PROJECT COMPONENTS ................................................................................................................................................. 8
PROJECT ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................................................................... 8
PROJECT LOCATIONS.................................................................................................................................................... 16
2.4.1
Itigidi Town Water Scheme (Abi LGA Project Locations) ........................................................................ 17
2.4.2 Obubra Town Water Scheme ( Obubra LGA Project Locations) ................................................................. 19
2.4.3
Okpoma Town Water Scheme ( Yala LGA Project Locations) .................................................................. 22
2.5 PROJECT ACTIVITY........................................................................................................................................................ 25
3
BASELINE INFORMATION .............................................................................. 31
3.1
3.2
3.3
GENERAL OVERVIEW.................................................................................................................................................... 31
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................................................................... 33
BASELINE DATA ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................................... 36
3.3.1
Analysis of Surface and Underground Water Samples................................................................................. 37
3.3.2
Soil Sample Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 42
3.3.3
Air Quality/Meteorological and Noise Measurement ................................................................................ 48
3.3.4
Environmental Impacts from the Water Treatment Process ......................................................................... 55
3.4 SOCIO-ECONOMICS....................................................................................................................................................... 57
3.4.1
Socio-Demographic Attributes of Respondents ............................................................................................ 57
3.5 HEALTH IMPART ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................................................................... 62
3.5.1
Obubra LGA Project areas................................................................................................................. 62
3.5.2
Abi LGA Project areas ..................................................................................................................... 62
3.5.3
Yala LGA Project areas .................................................................................................................... 62
4
POLICY, LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK .................................. 64
4.1
4.2
WORLD BANK SAFEGUARD POLICIES ......................................................................................................................... 64
NIGERIA’ REGULATORY FRAMEWORK..................................................................................................................... 64
4.2.1
The Federal Ministry of Environment. (FMEnv) ................................................................................ 64
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
v
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
4.2.2
5
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
International Guidelines and Conventions on Environment which Nigeria is signatory .......................................... 65
POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS ........................ 67
5.1
5.2
5.5
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................. 67
ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................................................... 67
POSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS IN THE LOCATIONS ...................................................................................... 81
Construction Phase ........................................................................................................................................... 81
Operation and Maintenance Phase ...................................................................................................................... 81
5.6 POTENTIAL NEGATIVE IMPACTS ............................................................................................................................... 81
5.7 WASTE WATER AND SLUDGE DISPOSAL .................................................................................................................. 81
5.7.1
Estimation of the quantities of sludge ..................................................................................................... 83
5.7.3
Sludge Treatment ............................................................................................................................... 85
5.8 POTENTIAL IMPACTS RELATED TO THE WATER DISTRIBUTION AND SUPPLY SCHEME IN ABI, OBUBRA AND
YALA LGAS .................................................................................................................................................................... 86
6
MITIGATION PLAN .......................................................................................... 105
6.1
7
INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................... 105
MONITORING PLAN ........................................................................................ 109
7.1
7.2
8
MONITORING PLAN ..................................................................................................................................................... 109
MONITORING PROCEDURE:........................................................................................................................................ 109
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN........................ 110
8.1
8.2
DEFINITION AND INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 110
IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENT ........................................................................................................................ 111
8.2.1.
World Bank................................................................................................................................... 112
8.2.2.
Cross River State Water Board Limited (CRSWBL) ............................................................................ 112
8.2.3.
Environmental Officer ...................................................................................................................... 112
8.2.4.
Contractor ...................................................................................................................................... 112
8.3 RECOMMENDED CAPACITY BUILDING AND TRAINING ...................................................................................... 113
8.3.1
Training Needs ............................................................................................................................... 113
8.3.2
Training of Contractors Personnel: ...................................................................................................... 114
8.4 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN BUDGET ................................................................................................. 114
9
PUBLIC CONSULTATION .............................................................................. 127
9.1
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................... 127
REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 129
APPENDICIES................................................................................................................ 130
APPENDIX 1: LIST OF ESIA PREPARERS ............................................................................................................................ 130
APPENDIX 2: SUMMARY OF WORLD BANK ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SAFEGUARD POLICIES ..................... 131
APPENDIX 3:- SOCIO-ECONOMIC DATA QUESTIONNAIRE ............................................................................................... 133
APPENDIX 4: CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CONDITIONS ............................... 137
APPENDIX 5: EXAMPLE FORMAT: HSE REPORT .............................................................................................................. 143
APPENDIX 6: ATTENDANCE AT PUBLIC CONSULTATIVE MEETINGS AND PROCEEDINGS OF MEETINGS ............ 144
APPENDIX 7: PROCEEDINGS OF MEETINGS ......................................................................................................................... 149
APPENDIX 8: DEVELOPMENT OF A WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN ............................................................................... 155
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
vi
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 2.1: OBUBRA WATER TREATMENT PLANT LAYOUT ........................................................................... 11
FIGURE 2.2: ITIGIDI WATER TREATMENT PLANT LAYOUT PLAN .................................................................. 13
FIGURE 2.3 OKPOMA WATER TREATMENT PLAN LAYOUT PLAN DRAWINGS ............................................ 15
FIGURE 2.4: MAP OF NIGERIA SHOWING PROJECT LOCATIONS IN CROSS RIVER STATE ........................... 16
FIGURE 2.5: COMMUNITIES AND PROPOSED WATER DISTRIBUTION NETWORK IN ABI LGA ..................... 17
FIGURE 2.7: COMMUNITIES AND WATER DISTRIBUTION NETWORK IN YALA LGA ..................................... 23
FIGURE 2.8 SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF A GENERAL TREATMENT PLANT ..................................................... 27
FIGURE 3.1: MAP OF NIGERIA SHOWING THE VEGETATION OF CROSS RIVER STATE ............................... 32
FIGURE 3.2: MEAN MONTHLY RELATIVE HUMIDITY IN THE STUDY AREA................................................ 49
FIGURE 3.3: MEAN MONTHLY TEMPERATURE VARIATIONS WITHIN THE STUDY AREA ......................... 49
FIGURE 5.1: IMPACT ASSESSMENT APPROACH ................................................................................................... 67
FIGURE 5.2: RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX .............................................................................................................. 74
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
vii
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 2.1: PROJECT COMPONENTS AND LOCATIONS IN ABI LGA ............................................................... 17
TABLE 2.3 PROJECT COMPONENTS AND LOCATIONS IN YALA LGA ............................................................ 24
TABLE 2.4: WATER DEMAND AND TREATMENT PLANT LAND TAKE ........................................................... 29
TABLE 2.5: ESTIMATION OF TOTAL SLUDGE GENERATED DURING THE PROJECT PERIOD ...................... 30
TABLE 3.1: POPULATION DISTRIBUTION OF CROSS RIVER STATE .................................................................. 35
TABLE 3.2: OBUBRA LGA PROJECT AREA: WATER QUALITY RESULT .......................................................... 37
TABLE 3.3. ABI LGA PROJECT AREA: WATER QUALITY RESULT ................................................................... 38
TABLE 3.4 YALA LGA PROJECT AREA: WATER QUALITY RESULT ................................................................. 40
TABLE 3.5: YALA LGA PROJECT AREA: PHYSIO-CHEMICAL QUALITY OF SOIL .......................................... 42
TABLE 3.6: OBUBRA PROJECT AREA: SOIL QUALITY RESULT.......................................................................... 44
TABLE 3.7: ABI PROJECT AREA: SOIL QUALITY RESULT................................................................................... 46
TABLE 3.8: METEOROLOGICAL MEASUREMENT FOR CRSWBL PROPOSED WATER PROJECT IN
SEPT/OCT 2009 ............................................................................................................................................... 51
TABLE 3.9: AMBIENT AIR QUALITY AND NOISE CHARACTERISTICS IN THE STUDY AREA ....................... 52
TABLE 3.10: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ...................................................... 55
TABLE 3.11: PROJECT AREAS, THEIR LGAS AND DEMOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION ...................................... 57
TABLE 3.12: SOCIO-ECONOMIC ATTRIBUTES OF RESPONDENT ..................................................................... 58
TABLE 3.13: PATTERN OF HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT ................................................................................ 63
TABLE 5.1: IMPACT CHARACTERIZATION ............................................................................................................ 69
TABLE 5.2: CHECKLIST FOR RANKING OF ASSOCIATED AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS .................................. 76
TABLE 5.3: IMPACT PROJECTION ........................................................................................................................... 77
TABLE 5.4: CON’TD: MITIGATION MEASURE ...................................................................................................... 78
TABLE 5.5: SLUDGE TREATMENT PROCESS ......................................................................................................... 82
TABLE 5.6: DAILY WATER PRODUCTION RATE.................................................................................................. 83
TABLE 5.7: ESTIMATION OF TOTAL QUANTITY OF SLUDGE ........................................................................... 84
TABLE 6.1 MITIGATION HIERARCHY FOR PLANNED PROJECT ACTIVITIES ............................................... 105
TABLE 6.2: MITIGATION MEASURES OF IMPACTS DURING PRE-CONSTRUCTION, CONSTRUCTION AND
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PHASE ............................................................................................... 106
TABLE 8.1: TRAINING COURSE OUTLINE .......................................................................................................... 113
TABLE 8.2: BUDGET AND RESPONSIBILITIES .................................................................................................... 114
TABLE 8.3: EMP TABLE PORTRAYING IMPACT, MITIGATION MEASURES, IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR MITIGATION AND MONITORING ........................................................... 115
TABLE 9.1: SUMMARY OF PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS IN ABI, OBUBRA AND YALA ..................................... 128
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
viii
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Introduction
The original Project, (NUWSRP-II) with an IDA credit of US$ 200 million (IDA Credit No. 4086UNI), was approved on July 15, 2005 in order to address some of the above deficiencies in water
supply services. The Project's Development Objectives were to (i) improve reliability of water supply
produced by the water treatment works in Lagos State; (ii) increase access to piped water networks in
four cities in Cross River State; and (iii) improve commercial viability of the urban water utilities in
Participating States. The project was made up of four components: (a) rehabilitation and systems
expansion, (b) public private partnership development, (c) service sustainability and project
management, (iv) institutional development and policy reform.
As a result of the successful implementation of NUWSRP 2 in the 2 states, the FGN is requesting an
additional financing of US$150 million from the International Development Association (IDA) for
Cross River state. The proposed additional credit will help finance the scaling up of the project
activities in Cross River state by supporting the construction of 3 additional water supply systems in
Itigidi, Obubra and Okpoma towns in the northern part of the state. A project extension of 3 years is
proposed to cover the above activities.
The proposed civil works of the Water Supply Scheme include: Construction of Intake and Weir;
 Construction of Low and High Lift Pumping Stations;
 Construction of Water Treatment Plants;
 Construction of Ground Level Reservoirs;
 Construction of Elevated Water Tanks;
 Constructions of Kiosk and house connections;
 Supply and lying of water supply pipes to cover approximately over 100km of sizes ranging
from OD 75mm – OD 500mm including accessories etc; and
 Construction of water kiosks and supply and installation of house connection, including
pipes, accessories, conventional credit water meters with automatic meter reading (AMR)
capabilities.
Purpose and Scope of the ESIA
The purpose of the ESIA is to identify the major issues and impacts associated with the project and
to identify mitigation measures required to limit any such impacts to acceptable levels. The scope of
the ESIA may be summarized as follows:
 Assess the potential environmental and social impacts of the sub-, whether positive or negative
and propose effective mitigation measures for the negative impacts;
 Inform the project team- Cross River State Water Board Limited- Project Implementation Unit
(CRSWB-PIU) and the CRSG of the potential impacts of different projects activities and
relevant mitigation measures and strategies to be undertaken;
 Develop an Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) to ensure successful mitigation
of all negative adverse impacts, a tangible monitoring indicator and plan, Estimate mitigation
cost and institutional arrangements to execute this plan; and to provide clear instructions to
works supervisors and contractors with regard to any measures that need to be implemented in
order to limit any potential negative impacts to acceptable levels.
 Identify environmental policies, legal and institutional framework pertaining to the project.
 Access the existing institutional capacity to implement the ESMP and suggest measures for
capacity gap development.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
ix
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Potential Environmental and Social Impacts
Water Supply projects are executed with the aim to improve water distribution services to the
population by expanding water distribution points and increasing the quantities of water distributed.
In general, therefore the proposed CRSG Water Supply Scheme would have substantial positive
social impacts that will improve the public health and subsequently conditions of living in the LGAs.
However, there are a number of aspects of the project which have potential negative impacts.
Table ES1 shows some of the identified potential impacts and their impact ratings.
ES1: Identified Potential impacts and their impact ratings
Impacts
Pre-construction Phase
Intake/
Weir
Operation & maintenance Phase
Pump/
Pipeline
Reservoirs/
Tanks
Intake/
Weir
Treatment
Plant
Pump/
Pipeline
Reservoirs/
Tanks
Intake/
Weir
Treatment
Plant
Pump/
Pipeline
Reservoirs/
Tanks
M
L
M
M
M
L
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
L
M
M
M
L
M
M
M
L
M
M
L
M
L
L
M
L
M
L
L
L
L
L
-
L
M
M
M
L
M
M
M
L
L
M
M
L
L
L
L
-
L
L-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
M
-
-
POLLUTION
Air pollution
M
Water pollution
L
Noise pollution
L
Soil Pollution
M
ENVIRONMENT
Soil Erosion
M
Ecosystem
M
depletion
WASTE GENERATION
Increased sludge
production
Increased waste
water
Solid waste
M
generation
HEALTH
Safety of the public
M
Public health risks
L
Risk of STDs
SOCIAL
Land take
Social Conflict for
water use
Disruption of
commercial
activities
Construction Phase
Treatment
plant
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
M
-
-
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
L
L
L
-
M
M
L
L
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
M
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
M
M
M
M
L
L
M
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
-
L
L
L
-
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
L
-
L
L
Key for impact rating:
High= H
Medium=M
Low=L
Not applicable = -
Table ES2 the potential impacts of the project and the proposed mitigation measures
Potential Impact
Soil Erosion and Contamination
Land take
Water Pollution
Noise Pollution
Public Health
Disturbance of Activities
Air Pollution
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
Mitigation measures
Appropriate erosion protection measures such as construction of
embankment or/and an alternate drainage route should be provided.
Necessary resettlement action plan shall commence where land
displacement is for permanent duration.
Disposal of sludge into the river or forest should be avoided
Contractors/CRSWBL shall stick to the industry noise level limit of
between 45dB and 55dB. Worker operating equipments exceeding
permissible noise limit must not work longer than 8 hours per day, in
addition to wearing necessary noise proof equipment
Proper maintenance site and removal of water from ditches especially after
rainfall or ground water infiltration. This should be done by the use of
water pumps
Establishment of traffic plans at locations of blockage; civil work activities
should be reduced to areas of work site and impact on private property
should be avoided as much as possible.
Sprinkling of water during dry periods to prevent dust and burning of
x
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Sludge Disposal
Solid waste
Aesthetics
Flora
Disruption of Economic
activities
`
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
waste should be avoided and waste collected should be directed to Cross
River State Environmental Protection and Assessment Department
(EPAD).
Sludge must be dewatered and stabilized and dry treated sludge can be
economically used as manure for agricultural purposes
Solid wastes to be generated during construction works shall be collected
and disposed in the EPAD designated site. Further guidelines can be seen
in the waste management plan.
During construction works, sites shall be delimited from the public with
appropriate equipments. Maintenance /rehabilitation works shall be
prompt in areas where there is leakage or any project induced factor that
may lead to poor aesthetics of the environment
Tree planting and re-vegetation shall be embarked upon to restore the
natural condition of the environment.
All civic works along the access roads shall be carried out in a manner that
will not close the road; and where roads need to be temporarily blocked
due to pipeline networking, a diversion route shall be created before
blocking the existing road
Environmental Management Plan
The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for Itigidi, Obubra and Okpoma water production
and distribution systems contains the following elements:
 Description of Mitigation Measures: The EMP identified feasible and cost effective measures to
reduce potentially significant adverse environmental and social impacts to acceptable levels.
 Description of Monitoring Program: Environmental performance monitoring is designed to ensure
that mitigation measures are implemented. It is in compliance with national standards,
International Finance Corporation Performance Standards and World Bank Safeguard Policies.
 Institutional Arrangements: Responsibilities for mitigation and monitoring are clearly defined
amongst the various stakeholders.
 Implementation Schedule and Reporting Procedures: The timing, frequency, and duration of mitigation
measures are specified in an implementation schedule, showing links with the overall Project
Implementation Plans (PIP).
Cost Estimate and Responsibility for the Environmental Management Plan
ITEM
Mitigation
Management
Monitoring
Training/
Capacity Building
Resettlement Cost
Sub- Total
Contingency
Total per LGA
Total for three
(3) LGAs
RESPONSIBILITY
CRSWBL- /EPAD
CRSWBL-CRSWBL-- / EPAD
CRSWBL/Consultant
COST BREAKDOWN
COST ESTIMATE
IN
NIGERIAN NAIRA
(N)
COST ESTIMATE
IN
US DOLLARS
(US$)
5% of Mitigation Cost
25% of Mitigation Cost
1,572,000
78,600
393,000
1,886,800
10,480
524
2620
12,579
10% of Sub- Total
2,343,000
6,273,400
1,707,340.
7,980,740
23,942,220
15,620
41,823
11,382
53,205
159,615
3 * Total per Town
The total cost for the EMP in the three (3) LGAs is estimated at Twenty Three Million Nine
Hundred and Forty Two Thousand, Two Hundred and Twenty only (N23, 942,220).
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
xi
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of Ikom, Ogoja and Obudu Water Supply Schemes
1
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background
The original Project, (NUWSRP-II) with an IDA credit of US$ 200 million (IDA Credit No. 4086UNI), was approved on July 15, 2005 in order to address some of the above deficiencies in water
supply services. The Project's Development Objectives were to (i) improve reliability of water supply
produced by the water treatment works in Lagos State; (ii) increase access to piped water networks in
four cities in Cross River State; and (iii) improve commercial viability of the urban water utilities in
Participating States. The project was made up of four components: (a) rehabilitation and systems
expansion, (b) public private partnership development, (c) service sustainability and project
management, (iv) institutional development and policy reform.
As a result of the successful implementation of NUWSRP 2 in the 2 states, the FGN is requesting
an additional financing of US$150 million from the International Development Association (IDA)
for Cross River state. The proposed additional credit will help finance the scaling up of the project
activities in Cross River state by supporting the construction of 3 additional water supply systems in
Itigidi, Obubra and Okpoma towns in the northern part of the state. A project extension of 3 years
is proposed to cover the above activities.
The proposed civil works of the Water Supply Scheme include: Construction of Intake and Weir;
 Construction of Low and High Lift Pumping Stations;
 Construction of Water Treatment Plants;
 Construction of Ground Level Reservoirs;
 Construction of Elevated Water Tanks;
 Constructions of Kiosk and house connections;
 Supply and lying of water supply pipes to cover approximately over 100km of sizes ranging
from OD 75mm – OD 500mm including accessories etc; and
 Construction of water kiosks and supply and installation of house connection, including pipes,
accessories, conventional credit water meters with automatic meter reading (AMR) capabilities.
The water supply scheme is aimed at providing access to portable pipe borne water to some
selected semi-urban and rural communities of the state. The water supply Scheme includes the
rehabilitation/construction of water production and distribution systems in the selected
communities.
1.2
Objectives of the ESIA
This report presents the results of the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) of the
civil works of the proposed project. The major objective of the ESIA is to identify potential
environmental and social impacts associated with the project and to identify any measures required
to limit such impacts to acceptable levels.
More specifically, the objectives of the ESIA are to:
 Assess the potential environmental and social impacts of the project’s activities (rehabilitation,
extension, or new constructions), and propose mitigation measures which will effectively
address these potential impacts;
1
Earthguards Limited
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of Ikom, Ogoja and Obudu Water Supply Schemes
 Inform the project team- Cross River State Water Board Limited- Project Implementation Unit
(CRSWB-PIU) and the CRSG of the potential negative impacts and propose relevant
mitigation measures and strategies to be undertaken;
 Develop an environmental and social management process to ensure successful mitigation of all
adverse impacts; develop a monitoring plan and institutional arrangements to execute this plan;
and to provide clear instructions to works supervisors and contractors with regard to any
measures that need to be implemented in order to limit any potential negative impacts to
acceptable levels
 Identify international and national environmental policies, legal and institutional frameworks
pertaining to the proposed project.
1.3
Scope of Work
The Consultant shall:

Study and familiarize himself with the provisions of ESMF and RPF prepared by the Federal
Ministry of Water Resources for the implementation of project activities in the participating
states.

Undertake field visits to each of the three towns and possible project sites Prepare an ESIA
report.

Ensure that each report mentioned in (b) above covers the entire project schemes of
Itigidi,Obubra and Okpoma.

Study and review Engineering and Technical Designs for planned investments to identify
assess and quantify to the extent possible, all environmental and social impacts and risks in
the project schemes.

Provide detailed and tangible mitigation measures to reverse these adverse impacts or
manage them within acceptable limits according to existing law in Nigeria and World Bank
Safeguard Policies.

Develop an Environmental and Social Management Process to ensure successful mitigation
of all adverse impacts, a tangible monitoring plan and institutional arrangements to execute
this plan.

Assess further the State Water Board’s capacity to manage the sub-project’s Environmental
and Social issues and propose measures on how to reinforce their capacity, for example, by
establishing an Environmental Unit, and providing technical training.

Suggest Capacity Building and Technical Assistance requirements in relation to safeguard
and awareness needs in the public and private sectors to be implemented under the
proposed sub-project.

Develop a suitable maintenance plan with estimates of costs to ensure sustainability of
mitigation measures.

Prepare outline reports that are concise but detailed and thorough to include all significant
Environmental and Social Impacts. The reports should focus on identifying impacts,
mitigating them in the Technical Designs, during construction, operation and sustainable
through an effective maintenance plan.

Submit six (6) separate Reports to the Cross River State Water Board Limited (CRSWBL).
2
Earthguards Limited
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
1.4 ESIA Process
The ESIA process details the methodology for the assessment and management of environmental
issues in any development project. This includes screening, scoping, baseline/ data collection,
identification of potential environmental impacts and required management action steps to be taken.
The applied ESIA process is presented below, while further site details are shown in chapter 5 of
this report.

Stage 1: Screening: This includes an analysis of the proposed project’s terms of activities to be
undertaken, and facility to be established in order to determine the suitability or otherwise of
project and whether EA was needed and the scale of impact. This was done using the World
Bank safeguards policies, ISO 14001 checklist criteria and best professional judgment. The
outcome of this is that the proposed project requires environmental assessment, and is a
category B project.

Stage 2: Scoping: Determines any project activities and facilities that might potentially cause
interferences with the environment and society. Furthermore, determines any particular
environmental sensitivities and conditions that are of relevance to the proposed project. This
includes a reconnaissance level visit and full field visit to the various project locations.

Stage 3: On the basis of the analysis in stages 1 and 2, identify any potential impacts of the
project on the environment. Depending on the nature of the project activities and facility, as
well as specific environmental conditions, the potential significance of such impacts is
determined.

Stage 4: Identifies and reviews relevant measures to be taken in order to prevent or reduce any
potential adverse impacts to acceptable levels. Furthermore, measures for monitoring and
control impacts, including verification of the proposed mitigations measures are determined.

Stage 5: Where impacts may not be successfully prevented or reduced to acceptable levels,
measures are defined to either recover environmental conditions, or compensate for
unavoidable damage.

Stage 6: Summary of impacts- The predicted adverse environmental and social impacts for
which mitigation is required should be identified and summarized.

Stage 7: Description of mitigation measures - The ESMP identifies feasible and cost effective
measures to reduce potentially significant adverse environmental and social impacts to
acceptable levels.

Stage 8: Description of monitoring program- environmental performance monitoring should be
designed to ensure that mitigation measures are implemented, have the intended result, and
remedial measures are undertaken if mitigation measures are inadequate or impacts have been
underestimated within the ESIA report. It should also assess compliance with national
guidelines and World Bank s OP 4.01 (Environmental Assessment).
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
3
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
1.5
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment

Stage 9: Institutional arrangements: Responsibilities for mitigation and monitoring should be
clearly defined. The EMP will identify arrangements for coordination between the various actors
responsible for mitigation.

Stage 10: Cost estimates: These should both the initial investment and recurring expenses for
implementing all measures contained in the ESMP and then integrated into the total project
costs.
Study Approach and Methodology
The ESIA will be prepared in accordance with:


World Bank Safeguard Policy- Operational Policy (OP/BP 4.01): Environmental Assessment,
and
Nigerian Government - Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Act No. 86 of 1992
A multi-methodological approach was used for the ESIA study to cover the following principal
areas:
 Project organization and planning,
 Environmental Assessment, and
 Socio-economic Assessment
Details of the assessment methodologies are as follows:
1.5.1
Organization and Planning
Project organization and planning was undertaken by collecting relevant materials and information
about the project; and a desk review of the literatures.
The materials collected and reviewed include:

The gazette of the Nigerian regulatory framework,
 Project Appraisal Document (PAD) of the NUWSRP2,







World Bank Safeguard Policies especially Environmental Assessment Safeguard Policy (OP
4.01),
the general environmental management conditions for construction contracts, engineering
and technical designs, work requirements of the treatment plants and other
extension/densification of Cross River water distribution system,
baseline information relating to the physical, biological and socio-cultural environment of
Ikom, Obudu and Ogoja, and the entire Cross River State (including the climatic conditions),
the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, numerous relevant Federal, State, and
local laws, regulations, decrees, acts, and guidelines,
The harmonized Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) of the National
Urban Water Sector Reform Project (NUWSRP),
Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) of NUWSRP, and
Baseline information relating to the physical, biological and socio-cultural environment of
Cross River State (including the climatic conditions),
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
4
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
1.5.2
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Environmental Study
Environmental study was based on:
Reconnaissance level survey
This was the first level visit to the project area to familiarize with the proposed facility sites and the
geo-physical conditions of the project area. It also included visits to institutions and authorities who
would partner in the implementation process as well as the various communities that this project
would be impacting; being the first stage of public consultation. This occurred along side the socioeconomic survey
Water quality study
Water samples for analysis were collected daily from various sources of water used by the
communities; including the proposed water extraction sources for the project. Water was collected as
a composite sample at each sample station. At each time of water collection, two separated set of
samples were collected, one for the determination of heavy metals and the other for the
determination of physico-chemical parameters. Water samples were collected in plastic containers
after being rinsed with ambient water from each station and labeled accordingly. Analysis of pyhsicochemical parameters was determined in the laboratory, while heavy metals were determined using the
Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (AAS). Water quality analysis in relation to the study is to determine
the bacteria loads, level of metal composition and chemicals, and subject them to the WHO/Nigerian
Federal Ministry of Environment standards for drinking water. Quality control of water collection
was ensured by:



Ensuring that professionals only collect water samples
Wearing hand gloves
Immersing the container inside the water and stoppering below surface water

Transporting samples to laboratory for analysis within 24 hours of collection.
Soil Quality study
Soil samples were collected from locations of various proposed constructions and installations. This
was also collected from the water resources sites being used or proposed for this water scheme
project for the purpose of determining the existing physico-chemical soil conditions.
Quality control of soil collection entailed;
o removing the topsoil, and collecting soil below 2cm from the surface soil-level,
o Air drying soil samples
o Labeling of each soil sample,
o Transporting samples to laboratory for analysis within 24 hours of collection.
This involved visits to all the communities of project influence in the 3 project areas. All the proposed
locations for facility constructions including the intake and weirs were visited to observe the nature of
the environmental conditions.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
5
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Air and Noise Quality
Using air and noise quality equipment, the experts tested surveyed proposed sites in all the project
areas. The analysis was subjected to the standards given by the Federal Ministry of Environment in
Nigeria. This will help during implementation for pollution control and compliance monitoring.
1.5.3 Social, Economic and Health Study
The first step adopted was to visit authorities and communities that this project would be impacting.
The community consultation as a tool of social study would not only community participation and
sustainable development, but was used to create awareness of the questionnaire to be administered to
the households in the project areas; and at the same time was useful for eliciting the communicable
health concerns of the project communities.
Semi Structured Interview (SSI) questionnaire, a tool of Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) was used
for data collection from the respondents.
A sample of the SSI Questionnaire used for the field study is presented in Appendix 5.
To ensure quality control of the field work, the following steps were taken:
Field Interviewers/Enumerators
The instrument was administered by well-trained and tested research assistants and enumerators,
under close supervision. Field enumerators were recruited based on the following:
 Graduate from a higher institution;
 Ability to speak the local language;
 Familiarity with the project area.
Training was held for all field enumerators and supervisors by the experts in the consulting firm. The
training included:
 Detailed explanation of the entire project;
 The importance, and how to administer the questionnaires;
 Field practices/ reconnaissance survey using the SSI;
 Cross Checking of questionnaire filled by the research assistants enumerators during the field
practice to ascertain their ability to use the SSI.
1.6 Project Classification
The classification phase involves a preliminary screening that categorizes the proposed project, so as
to determine the nature and extent of the environmental assessment needed. Projects are classified as
category A, B or C (high, medium and low social or environmental risks) depending on the type,
location (nearness to ecologically vulnerable areas), sensitivity and scale of the project, as well as the
nature and magnitude of its possible impacts.
 Category A: A proposed project is classified in this category if it is likely to have significant
adverse environmental impacts that are sensitive (and may be irreversible), diverse or
unprecedented. These projects may affect an area broader than the sites or facilities subject to
physical work.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
6
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
 Category B: A proposed project receives this classification if it has potential environmental
impacts on human populations or environmentally important areas –including wetlands, forests,
grasslands, and other natural habitats –that are less adverse than those of Category A projects.
These impacts are site-specific; few if any of them are irreversible; and in most cases mitigation
measures can be designed more readily than for Category A projects.
 Category C: A proposed project is classified as a Category C if it is likely to have minimal or no
adverse environmental impacts.
This project is classified as a Category B project because:
o Its impacts are site specific
o Its impacts are reversible, or in most cases have practical mitigation measures
o Most of its impacts fall within medium and low ratings.
As a result of the above justification and classification, this project is classified as a Category B
(medium impacts) project. It is therefore required that an Environmental and Social Impact
Assessment (ESIA) be prepared.
This ESIA report is prepared as a stand alone document for ease of implementation by the
CRSWBL.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
7
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
2
2.1
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project Rationale
The Cross River State Government considers the provision of potable water as a critical
element in its policy for sustainable economic development and poverty reduction. The
project’s principal development outcomes are:
 Increased reliability and financial viability of selected urban water utilities;
 Increased access to piped water networks in selected urban areas; and
 Improve financial viability of the urban water utilities in the selected urban areas
of Cross River State.
Progress toward these principal development outcomes will be measured through:
 The increase in water delivered through existing and extended networks;
 Improvements in cost recovery, especially the degree to which operating costs
are recovered from water sales revenues in Cross River State; and
 Increase in the number of households having access to the piped water network.
2.2
Project Components
The proposed civil works of the Water Supply Scheme include: Construction of Intake and Weir;
 Construction of Low and High Lift Pumping Stations;
 Construction of Water Treatment Plants;
 Construction of Ground Level Reservoirs;
 Construction of Elevated Water Tanks;
 Supply and lying of water supply pipes to cover approximately over 100km of sizes
ranging from OD 75mm – OD 500mm including accessories etc.
 Construction of about 130 water kiosk and supply and installation of house
connection, including pipes, accessories, conventional credit water meters with
automatic meter reading (AMR) capabilities for approximately 1,500 house
connection.
The CRSWBL commissioned detailed engineering design for these civil works for these civil
works to result in construction specifications and drawings for inclusion in the tender
documents; this work has been carried by SGI Consulting Engineers Limited.
2.3
Project Environment
From field survey and expert review of the feasibility report of the proposed sites the site
information of the various facilities across the three (3) project areas are presented as
follows:
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
8
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Fig 2.1(a): A section of River Cross, source of
intake for Itigidi and Obubra project areas
Fig 2.1(b): A section of Onwan river source of
Intake for Okpoma project area
Fig 2.1(d): Proposed Treatment Plant site at
Obubra showing uncompleted building and
Farm land to be affected
Fig 2.1(c): Proposed New Treatment
Plant site at Itigidi old market
Fig 2.1(e): Proposed New Treatment
Plant site at Okpoma
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Fig 2.1(f): Affected buildings in the right of way
of water pipeline in Itigidi
9
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Obubra site information:
Intake and Weir Site
The intake and weir plant is located by the river bank of River Cross at Adun Beach. The
land take is about 50m x 100m. Activities around the river bank include crop cultivation,
while fishing is said to take place at a distance as a result of constant human activities by the
community which have drove aquatic habitats afar–off. There are no buildings and/or
habitations within the area. Access to the treatment plant is through motor-bike.
Raw water extraction is from River Cross which bisects Itigidi, Obubra, Ikom and flows
through to Republic of Cameroun. The River is massive, and has a historical record of large
water resources at both dry and rainy seasons (SGI Ingenierie SA of Geneva, 2009).
Treatment Plant Site:
The proposed treatment plant site is located at the left bank side of Adun Beach village
about 500m away from the intake site. It is a communal land given to individuals for
agricultural purposes. The total land space measures 350m x 250m. There is an uncompleted
building project about 70m west of the proposed site. The site is located about 250m away
from the regular settlements. Figure 2.1 shows the Obubra water treatment plant layout.
Pipeline network route
The water pipeline work is expected to follow along existing road path. The communities
where the pipeline will pass through are mostly rural. Their major occupation is farming,
with few people into petty trading. There are no private or community assets or means of
livelihood to be affected by the pipeline work. However, intermittent obstruction to
movement is expected. As a result of this, basic safety cautions for construction works will
apply.
Kiosk Construction sites
The construction of kiosks will be done at various points within the settlements. It is
expected to be situated on the Neighborhood on certification of feasibility study of
proposed site. However, necessary sanitation plan and training is being proposed as an
integral of the management plan.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
10
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
1.
A
COAGULATION +FLOCCULATION
TNAK
SETTLING TANK
SAND FILTER
CHLORINATION TANK
CLEAR WATER TANK
PUMPING STATION (CONVEYANCE)
BACK WASH PUMPING STATION
SLUDGE PUMPING STATION
SLUDGE THICKENER
DRYING BEDS
RETURN WATER PUMPING
STATION
HEADQUARTER BUILDING
B
ELECTRICAL BUILDING
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
C TECHNICAL BUILDING
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
From River
Cross
F
1
D
B
C
11
22
2
9
2222
A
10
0
8
3
E
8
1
0
1
0
7
G
5
6
D REAGENT BUILDING
E
COMPRESSOR BUILDING
F
GUARD HOUSE
FIRST STAGE
5
INVESTMENT
LONG TERM
INVESTMENT
ACCESS ROAD
Figure 2.1: Obubra Water Treatment Plant Layout
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
Water supply
conveyance
4
11
system
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Itigidi site information:
Intake and Weir site
The facility is using the existing intake site at Itigidi town, which lies about 200m away from the Itigidi town hall, and about 150m away from
the existing water treatment plant. Raw water extraction is from River Cross which bisects Itigidi, Obubra, Ikom and flows through Republic of
Cameroun. The River is massive, and has a historical record of large water resources at both dry and rainy seasons (SGI Ingenierie SA of
Geneva, 2009))
Treatment Plant Site:
The existing plant operating from that site is virtually redundant and will be replaced by the proposed new plant because the existing plant site
is not large enough to accommodate the new plant. The new plant is about 300m away from the old site. It is on the side of the old market.
The local authority has built a new market, and has offered the old market for the new water treatment plant.
There is neither human habitation nor agricultural activities in the proposed site. Figure 2.2 shows the Itigidi water treatment plant layout.
Pipeline network route
The water pipeline work is expected to follow along existing road path for the most of the rural developing adjoining communities. In this area
the settlement pattern is typically traditional with scattered and nucleated structures of houses made of mostly mud walls. However, pipeline in
Itigidi town will follow the existing right of way. This will entail the rehabilitation of the existing pipeline network. This will obviously disrupt
movement and affect private assets.
Kiosk Construction sites
The construction of kiosks will be done at various points within the settlements. It is expected to be situated on the Neighbourhood on
certification of feasibility study of proposed site. However, necessary sanitation plan and training is being proposed as an integral of the
management plan.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
12
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
B
ELECTRICAL BUILDING
C
TECHNICAL BUILDING
D
REAGENT BUILDING
F
GUARD HOUSE
G
4
5
6
7
10
B
Water supply
conveyance
system
COAGULATION +FLOCCULATION TNAK
SETTLING TANK
SAND FILTER
CHLORINATION TANK
CLEAR WATER TANK
PUMPING STATION (CONVEYANCE)
BACK WASH PUMPING STATION
SLUDGE PUMPING STATION
SLUDGE THICKENER
DRYING BEDS
RETURN WATER PUMPING STATION
HEADQUARTER BUILDING
5
E
3
ITIGIDI
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
A
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
10
F
8
9
C
22
22
ACCESS ROAD
A
1
FIRST STAGE
D
INVESTMENT
LONG TERM
11
INVESTMENT
From River Cross
Figure 2.2: Itigidi Water Treatment Plant Layout Plan
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
13
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Okpoma site information
Intake site
The proposed intake site is situated on the Onwe River. The land is owned by the
community and is located 4km away from settlement. The land was previously used for crop
cultivation purpose until it was offered for use of the water scheme.
Feasibility study carried out by SGI Ingenierie SA of Geneva (2009) on behalf Cross River
State Water Board shows that Onwe River is large and feasible to serve the purpose of the
scheme along with other competing local uses in both dry and rainy seasons.
Treatment Plant Site:
The treatment plant is located in Idigbo-Okpoma, about 3 km distance away from
settlement, and the land take is about 275M x 200M. The land is owned by the community,
who has offered same for the facility. The site is located in a grass land space with no
habitation. Surrounding land around the proposed site is used for farming by members of
the community. The plan layout of the Okpoma water treatment plant is shown in figure 2.3.
There is a road from Okpoma to the Onwe River that at present is motor-able only in the
dry season but which, as part of the project, will be converted to an all-season laterite road.
This will be of assistance to the farmers who till land in areas bordering this road and
provide them an opportunity to move their produce to the market.
Pipeline network route
The water pipeline work is expected to follow along existing road path. The communities
where the pipeline will pass through are mostly rural. The settlement pattern is typically
traditional with scattered and nucleated structures of houses made of mostly mud walls.
Their major occupation is farming. There are no private or community assets or means of
livelihood to be affected by the pipeline work. However, intermittent obstruction to
movement is expected. As a result of this, basic safety cautions for construction works will
apply.
Kiosk Construction sites
The construction of kiosks will be done at various points within the settlements. It is
expected to be situated on the Neighbourhood on certification of feasibility study of
proposed site. However, necessary sanitation plan and training is being proposed as an
integral of the management plan.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
14
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
OKPOMA
FROM ONWE RIVER
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
A
COAGULATION +FLOCCULATION TNAK
SETTLING TANK
SAND FILTER
CHLORINATION TANK
CLEAR WATER TANK
PUMPING STATION (CONVEYANCE)
BACK WASH PUMPING STATION
SLUDGE PUMPING STATION
SLUDGE THICKENER
DRYING BEDS
RETURN WATER PUMPING STATION
HEADQUARTER BUILDING
B
ELECTRICAL BUILDING
C
TECHNICAL BUILDING
D
REAGENT BUILDING
E
COMPRESSOR BUILDING
F
Water supply
conveyance
system
1
10
9
1
6
D
B
2
A
2 22
22
C
8
F
5
GUARD HOUSE
ACCESS ROAD
FIRST STAGE
E
INVESTMENT
E
4
3
LONG TERM
INVESTMENT
Figure 2.3 Okpoma Water Treatment Plan Layout Plan Drawings
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
7
15
5
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
2.4
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Project Locations
The proposed project will be carried out in Abi, Obubra and Yala LGAs as seen in figure 2.4
and exact description of the project components in the three (3) LGAs can be seen in the
sections that follow.
Figure 2.4: Map of Nigeria showing project locations in Cross River State
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
16
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Itigidi Town Water Scheme (Abi LGA Project Locations)
2.4.1
The Abi LGA project area comprises of Itigidi town and 12 communities namely
Adadama, Egboronyi, Emin Ekpon, Anong, Likpoma, Akaefor Esegeh, Akarefor,
Ekureku, Agbara, Ngarebe, Akpoha, Itgeve and Isong Inyang. Figure 2.5 indicates the
water facilities, pipeline routes and the communities to be connected to the proposed
Water Supply Scheme.
Figure 2.5: Communities and proposed water distribution network in Abi LGA
Table 2.1: Project Components and Locations in Abi LGA
Location
Project Components
Itigidi Town


Raw Water Intake Station is via a LLPS through (0.05km/500mm diameter) Ductile pipes to a
Water Treatment Plant
Water Treatment Plant

Water Treatment Plant pipes (DI) of (1km/450mm diameter) to school rd GLR

Primary Pipes (DI) of (1km400mm diameter) from School rd GLR via a HLPS to LGA Hq GLR

Primary Pipes of (0.8km/300mm diameter) from School rd GLR pipes to Central Itigidi

Primary pipes of 0.8km/180mm diameter from LGA Hq to Northern Itigidi

Distribution within Northern and Central Itigidi town via secondary PVC pipes (8.5km)

Construction of 16 kiosks in Itigidi town

LGA Hq primary pipes (DI) of 2.5km/400mm diameter) to T-junction
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
17
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Location
Project Components
Location

T junction pipes(DI) of 5.8km/300mm diameter to Adadama GLR

Primary pipes of (1km/300m diameter) from Adadama GLR to Adadama community

Distribution within Adadama community via secondary PVC pipes (7.7km)

Construction of 14 kiosks Adadama community

Primary pipes(HDPE) of (0.7km/110mm diameter) from Adadama GLR to Imina EWT

Primary pipes of (0.1km/110mm diameter) from Imina EWT to Imina community

Primary pipes of (2km/110mm diameter) from Imina EWT to Itigieve community

Primary pipes of (0.7km/75mm diameter from Itigieve community to Isong Inyang community

Distribution within Itigieve and Isong Inyang communities via secondary PVC pipes (1.2 km)

Construction of 3 kiosks in Itigieve and Isong Inyang communities

Distribution with Akerofor community via secondary PVC pipes (3.2 km)

Construction of 8 kiosks in Akerofor community

Distribution with Akerofor Esegeh commuinty via secondary PVC pipes (0.6km)

Construction of 2 kiosks in Akerofor Esegeh community

Primary pipes of (0.9km/100mm diameter) from Akerofor community to Likpoma community

Distribution within Likpoma communty via secondary PVC pipes (0.9km)

Construction of 2 kiosks in Likpoma community

Primary pipes of (0.5km/250mm diameter) from Anong EWT to Ekureku community

Distribution within Ekureku community via secondary PVC pipes (3km)

Construction of 7 kiosks in Ekureku community

Primary pipes of (1.4km/160mm diameter) from Ekureku community to Akpoha community

Distribution within Akpoha community via secondary PVC pipes (2.4km)

Construction of 6 kiosks in Akpoha community

Primary pipes of (1.4km/200mm diameter) from Ekureku community to Ngarebe community

Distribution within Ngarebe community via secondary PVC pipes (2.6km)

Construction of 7 kiosks in Ngarebe community

Primary pipes of (0.8km/200mm diameter) from Ngarebe community to Agbara

Distribution within Agbara community via secondary PVC pipes (7 km)

Construction of 18 kiosks in Agbara community
Adadama/Imina
Itigieve
Akerofor
Likpoma
Ekureku
Akpoha
Ngarebe
Agbara
The Water Supply Scheme for Abi LGA and surrounding communities is as follows:
 Surface water abstraction from river cross by means of intake raw Water Pumping Station
located at Itigidi close to River Cross.
 Treatment plant located at Itigidi receive the raw water for processing
 High Lift Pumping Station (HLPS) at Local Government Authority conveys the total water
demand from the treatment plant to the planned Local Government Authority Ground
Level Reservoir (LGA GLR).
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
18
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
 From this GLR, treated water is supplied to central Itigidi center will be secure through two
newly built reservoirs such as a GLR installed close to School Road and design to supply
the lowest part of the city, called central Itigidi and EWT sited on the LGA GLR location
which will be built to supply Northern Itigidi.
 A gravity main will be linked to the outlet of the LGA GLR and go on to the North-East to
Adadama-Egboronyi junction where a T will be installed
 From the T junction, the proposed pipe goes straight to Adadama GLR through the main
road.
 A proposed Elevated Water Tank (EWT) will be constructed at Imina to supply water to the
communities of Itigeve and Isong Inyang.
 Also from the junction, a 350mm ductile iron pipe will be connected to the T and will carry
on to the Egboronyi- Emin Ekpon junction.
 On the junction quoted above, a double socket tee will be installed to supply three proposed
overhead reservoir in Emin-Ekpon and Egboronyi, distributing water to the respective
communities and Anong, distributing water to Anong, Agbara, Akpoha, Ekureku, Akarefor,
Ngarebe and Likpoma.
2.4.2 Obubra Town Water Scheme ( Obubra LGA Project Locations)
The Obubra LGA project area comprises of Obubra town and 18 communities namely
Owakande I, Owakande II, Ogada I, Ogada II, Apipum, Ofatura, Ovonum, Ofodua,
Iyamoyong, Ohana, Ofukpa, Ofat, Ababene, Obubra station/ Mile I, Onyedama, Adun
Beach, Ofonbongha, Ochon and Oderigha. Figure 2.6 indicates the water facilities, pipeline
routes and the communities to be connected to the proposed Water Supply Scheme.
Figure 2.6: Communities and proposed water distribution network in Obubra LGA
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
19
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Table 2.2: Project Components and Locations in Obubra LGA
Location
Adun Beach
Project Components

Raw Water Intake Station through Ductile pipes of (0.5 Km/600mm diameter)to a Water
Treatment Plant at Adun Beach

Primary pipes (HDPE) of (1km/75mm diameter) from Water Treatment Plant to Adun
Beach EWT

Pipes of (0.1km/110mm diameter) from Adun EWT to Adun Beach

Distribution within Adun Beach community via secondary PVC pipes (1.3km)


Construction of 3 kiosks in Adun Beach community
Primary pipes (DI) of (5.1km/400mm diameter) from Water Treatment Plant to Ofat
EWT

Pipes of (0.2km/500mm diameter) from Ofat EWT to Ofat junction

Pipes of (0.2km/300mm diameter) from Ofat junction to Ofat community

Distribution within Ofat commuinty via secondary PVC pipes (5.1km)

Construction of 10 kiosks in Ofat community

Pipes of (1.9km/400mm diameter) from Ofat junction to Ofatura

Distribution within Ofatura community via secondary PVC pipes (2.9km)

Construction of 6 kiosks in Ofatura community

Pipes of (0.3km/350mm diameter) from Ofatura to Ofodua

Distribution within Ofodua community via secondary PVC pipes (8.3km)

Construction of 16 kiosks in Ofodua community

Pipes of (1km/300mm diameter) from Ofat junction to Abebene

Distribution within Ababene community via secondary PVC pipes (7.6km)



Construction of 19 kiosks in Ababene community
Pipe of (1.3km/250mm diameter) from Ofat junction to Oderigha
Distribution within Oderigha community via secondary PVC pipes (2.1km)

Construction of 4 kiosks in Oderigha community

Pipes of (2.6km/180mm diameter) from Oderigha to Onyeadema

Distribution within Onyedama community via secondary PVC pipes (4.1km)


Construction of 10 kiosks in Onyedama community
Primary pipes (DI) of (4.1km450mm diameter)from Water Treatment Plant to Apapium
GLR

Pipes (DI) of (0.03km/350mm diameter) from Apapium GLR to Apapium EWT

Pipes of (1.7km/450mm diameter) from Apapium EWT to Apapium community

Distrbution within Apapium community via secondary PVC pipes (7.9km)

Construction of 15 kiosks in Apapium community

Pipes of (1.3km/300mm diameter) from Apapium community to Ovonum community

Distribution within Ovonum community via secondary PVC pipes (5.6km)

Construction of 10 kiosks in Ovonum community

Pipes of (1.9km/60mm diameter) from Apapium EWT to Ofukpa community

Distribution within Ofukpa community via secondary PVC pipe

Construction of 1 kiosks in Ofukpa community
Ofat
Ofatura
Ofodua
Abebene
Oderigha
Onyedama
Apapium
Ovonum
Ofukpa
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
20
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Location
Project Components
Mile 1

Pipe (DI) of (12.1km/350mm diameter) from Apapium GLR to Mile 1 EWT

Pipe of (0.04km/300mm diameter) from Mile I EWT to Mile I community

Distribution within Mile I community via secondary PVC pipe (3.8km)

Construction of 7 Kiosks in Mile I/ Obubra Town

Pipe of (2.1km/250mm diameter) from Mile I community to Ogada junction

Pipe of (5km/160mm diameter) from Ogada junction to Ogada I community

Distribution within Ogada I community via PVC pipe (3.6km)

Construction of 9 Kiosks in Ogada I community

Pipes of (1.1km/200mm diameter) from Ogada junction to Ogada II community

Distribution within Ogada II community via PVC pipe (5.2km)

Construction of 13 Kiosks in Ogada II community

Pipes of (0.09km/125mm diameter) from Ogada II community to Owakande II community

Distribution within Owakande I community via PVC pipe (1.6km)

Construction of 4 Kiosks in Owakande I community

Pipe of (1.2km/300mm diameter) from Mile I EWT to Obubra junction

Distribution within Obubra junction community via PVC pipe (3.8km)

Construction of 7 Kiosks in Obubra junction community

Pipe of (0.8km/200mm diameter) from Obubra junction to Obubra station

Pipe of (1.8km/200mm diameter) from Obubra junction to Obubra I community

Distribution within Obubra I community via PVC pipe (2.2km)

Construction of 4 Kiosks in Obubra I

Pipe of (2.5km/250m diameter) from Obubra junction to Owakande community

Distribution within Owakande I community via PVC pipe (2.3km)

Construction of 6 Kiosks in Owakande I community


Pipe of (0.4km/225mm diameter) from Owakande to Ofonbongha I community
Pipe of (0.9km/200mm diameter) from Ofonbongha I community to Ofonbongha II
community
Pipe of (0.3km/200mm diameter) from Ofonbongha II community to Ofonbongha III
community
Pipe of (1km/180mm diameter) from Ofonbongha III community to Ofonbongha IV
community
Ogada I
Ogada II
Owakande II
Obubra junction
Obubra I
Owakande I
Ofonbongha


Ohana
Iyamoyong

Distribution within Ofongbongha communities via PVC pipe (7.3km)



Construction of 18 Kiosks in Ofongbonga communities
Pipe (HDPE) of 8.3km/180mm diameter) fromApiapum GLR to Ohana EWT
Pipe of (1.7km/160mm diameter) from Ohana EWT to Ohana community

Distribution wthin Ohana community via PVC pipe (3.5km)

Construction of 9 Kiosks in Ohana community
Pipe of (1.3km/200mm diameter) from Ohana EWT to Iyamoyong community
Distribution wthin Iyamoyong community via PVC pipe (5.6km)
Construction of 14 Kiosks in Iyamoyong community
The water supply system for Obubra and its surrounding communities is as follows:

Surface water abstraction from River Cross by means of raw water intake pumping station
located at Adun beach;

The raw water will be pumped to a new treatment plant situated at 500m away from the
intake.

On the treatment plant site, a new pumping station will be erected, housing three outlets to
convey the clear water from the clear water tank (CWT) to the reservoirs of the scheme.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
21
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
o
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
A low lift pumping station will provide water to a newly built elevated water tank
(EWT) at Adun Beach. This concrete tank will provide water to the small
community living in Adun Beach area.
o
A High Lift Pumping Station (HLPS) will supply water to a new EWT in Ofat, and
in turn provide water to Ofodua, Ofotura, Ofat, Abebene, and Onyedama.
o
Another HLPS will allow conveying water to a Ground Level Reservoir (GLR) on
the Apapium high point.

The GLR will be used as a transfer and storage reservoir and a LLPS will be constructed on
the same site to allow the filling of the newly Elevated Water Tank (EWT) erected near by
and supplying water to Apiapium, Ovonum and Ofukpa.

Two High Lift Pumping Station (HLPS) will be built on the Apapium Reservoir site those
set will convey water coming from the Apiapum GLR to remote communities like Ohana
and Mile I.

2.4.3
The Mile I EWT is designed to provide water to Obubra and its surrounding communities.
Okpoma Town Water Scheme ( Yala LGA Project Locations)
The Yala LGA project area comprises of Okpoma town and 13 communities namely
Abachor, Okpinya, Idigbo, Olachor, Adiero, Woleche, Utukpo, Utukpo Iponle, Iboko, Itega
Udenyina, Okpodu and Igbekurekor. Figure 2.7 shows the locations of the proposed Water
Supply Scheme facilities and the communities in which they would be located.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
22
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Figure 2.7: Communities and water distribution network in Yala LGA
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
23
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Table 2.3 Project Components and Locations in Yala LGA
Location
Project Components


Raw water intake station via Ductile pipes of (1.7km/450mm diameter) to a new Water Treatment Plant at
Supply of water via HDPE pipes of (0.05km/50mm diameter) from Water Treatment Plant (TP) to Udenyina
Elevasted Water Tank (EWT)

Distribution within Udenyina community via secondary pipes of (0.2km)
Udenyina

Construction of 1 kiosk in Udenyina community
T Junction

Supply of water via DI pipes of (2.8km/450mm diameter) from TP to T Junction
Woleche

HDPE pipes of (2.8km /110mm diameter) from T junction to Woleche EWT

Pipes of (1km/110mm diameter) from Woleche EWT to Woleche

Distribution within Woleche community via secondary PVC pipes (0.6km)

Construction of 2 kiosks in Woleche community

Pipes of (1.7km/75mm diameter) from Woleche community to Iboko community

Distribution within Iboko community via secondary PVC pipes (0.3km)

Construction of 1 kiosk in Iboko community

Pipes of (0.6km /160mm diameter) from Woleche EWT to Utukpo

Distribution within Utukpo community via secondary PVC pipes (0.7km)

Construction of 2 kiosks in Utukpo community

Distribution within Utukpo Iponle community via secondary PVC pipes (0.6km)

Construction of 1 kiosk in Utukpo Iponle

Pipes of (3.2km/160mm diameter) from Utukpo community to Itega community

Distribution within Itega community via secondary PVC pipes (2.2km)

Construction of 5 kiosks in Itega community

DI pipes of (4.6km 450mm diameter) from T junction to Okpoma EWT

Pipes of (0.5km/500mm diameter) from Okpoma EWT to Okpoma

Distribution within Okpoma community via secondary PVC pipes (19.4km)

Construction of 36 Kiosks in Okpoma community

HDPE pipes of (3.9km/160mm diameter) from Okpoma EWT to Local Government EWT

Pipes of (0.4km/250mm diameter) from Okpoma EWT to Olachor

Distribution within Olachor community via secondary PVC pipes (6km)

Construction of 15 kiosks in Olachor community

Pipes of (0.9km/180mm diameter) from Olachor to Adiero

Distrbution within Adiero community via secondary PVC pipes (0.5km)

Construction of 1 kiosk at Adiero community

Pipes of (0.6km/180mm diameter) from Adiero community to Idigbo community

Distribution within Idigbo community via secondary PVC pipes (1.7km)

Construction of 4 kiosks in Idigbo community

Pipes of (1km/140mm diameter) from Idigbo commuity to Okpinya community

Construction of 1 kiosk at Okpinya community

Pipes of (0.1km/140mm diameter) from Okpinya community to Abachor community

Distribution within Abachor community via secondary PVC pipes (1.8km)

Construction of 4 kiosks in Abachor community

Pipes of (2km/200mm diameter) from LG EWT to Okpodu community

Distribution within Okpodu community via secondary PVC pipes (3.8km)

Construction of 9 kiosks in Okpodu community

Distribution within Igbekurekor community via secondary PVC pipes (2.1km)

Construction of 5 kiosks in Igbekurekor community
Iboko
Utukpo
Utukpo Iponle
Itega
Okpoma
Olachor
Adiero
Idigbo
Abachor
Igbekurekor
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
24
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
The water supply system for Yala LGA and its surrounding communities is as follows:

Surface water abstraction from Onwe River close to Udenyina by means of raw water
intake pumping station;

A new water treatment plant will be built 1,700m inland from the water intake pumping
station ;

From the new water treatment plant, a High Level Pumping Station (HLPS) will be
designed to supply water to 3 new Elevated Water Tanks (EWT) in Woleche
community (on the South West), Okpoma community (in the center) and close to the
LGA. In the height of Okpoma through a main pipe along the road to Okpinya to a Tjunction about 2km to these communities. From this junction, two pipes will be laid
down:
o
The first will carry water to Woleche EWT straight south.
o
The second pipe will convey water to Okpoma EWT through a HDPE pipe of
Ǿ450 and also convey water to EWT in the height of Okpoma close to LGA.

At proposed treatment plant site, a small submersible pump will be installed in the clear
water tank to allow the filling of a small overhead reservoir to supply water to Udenyina
community.
2.5
Project Activity
2.5.1
Intake and Low Lift Pumping Station
There will be an intake structure for water admission into the low lift pumping station
through a vertical opening of 1.0 m width and with height from 17.5 masl to the top of
the intake structure, about 12.5m.
The construction work shall include wooden stop logs of total width adequate to isolate
the opening to the suction chamber, and a total height of 12,500 mm, in separate and
exchangeable sections.
There shall be the construction of Steel track rack, constructed of separate and
exchangeable sections of a total width of 1200 mm with clearance openings of 30 mm.
Each section shall have a seating and a top plates, with individual hooking arrangement
for lifting/lowering. The supply and installation/fixing shall include metal guides slots to
be embedded in concrete including anchoring pieces.
There shall be a steel beam for lifting and lowering of any section of either stop log or
trash rack. Also to be installed is a three vertical turbine pumps (2 in operations and 1
stand by) for outdoor installation.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
25
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
2.5.2
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Raw Water Main
The raw water main is to convey raw water from the LLPS to the aerator in the
treatment plant.
The pipeline shall be of Ductile Iron according to ISO std. 2531, pressure rating K9,
with bell and spigot connections and will have a total length of about 1,475m.

Internal lining: Cement mortar (ISO 4179)

External coating: Zinc metal + Bitumen (ISO 8179)
The pipeline shall be provided with all necessary DI elbows, tees and other accessories
for the installation of air valves and wash out valves. Each one of the the air valves and
wash out valves shall be installed in a reinforced concrete covered 1.2 x 1.5 m chamber.
Anchor blocks will be constructed against movements of line accessories (tees, elbows,
reducers, etc.), at highest test pressure applied.
2.5.3
Access Road from Existing Roads to Intake and Treatment Plants
There will be road construction in Okpoma and Obubra project areas to enhance easy
access to the intake and treatment plant sites. This shall entail earthwork activities
including land clearing and stripping of top soils.
Earthwork:
Fill: The fill shall be compacted in layers of a compacted thickness of 150 mm or such
other thickness as may be found necessary to achieve the required density.
Cut:
The top 150 mm shall be watered and compacted to 100% B.S standard compaction at
optimum moisture content (OMC)
2.5.4
Treatment Plant
The schematic drawing of the proposed treatment plants is presented in figure 2.8, while
description of the work process follows.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
26
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
3. Flocculation
Pre-oxidation
6. Disinfection by
Chlorination Tank
Anionic polymer
chlorine
5. Sand Filtration
4. Sedimentation
Fast mixing tank
Slow mixing tank
Alum sulphate
Settling Tank
Sand Filter
Extracted
sludge
Low lift
pumping
station
River
Water supply
Conveyance system
Chlorine gas
2. Lime Alum sulphate
8. Sludge pumping
Backwash
1.
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Chlorination
Tank
7. Clear water
storage tank
station
9. Sludge thickening
10. Dewatering drying
bed
11. Sludge disposal
Sludge disposal
Return water pumping
station
Filtration water
Figure 2.8 Schematic Diagram of a General Treatment Plant
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
27
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Description of the proposed treatment work process
The water treatment works will be a conventional process made up of pre-oxidation,
flocculation/coagulation, settling tank/sedimentation, filtration and disinfection.
Stage 1: Pre-oxidation and pH adjustment

Pre-oxidation
The removal of metallic species in raw waters is possible by a physiochemical process:
coagulation, flocculation and sedimentation. However, a pre-oxidation by chlorine gas
improves this phenomenon: this reagent, effective over a wide pH range, is useful to oxidize
metals, especially Iron, and Manganese.

pH adjustment
Lime shall be added to get the optimal coagulation –flocculation pH (around 8.5).
Stage 2: Coagulation
The coagulation and flocculation processes facilitate the removal of total suspended solids
(TSS), colloids and possibly precipitates of Iron and Manganese, which occurs in a final stage
of solids-liquid separation (or sedimentation).
Coagulation corresponds to the destabilization of colloidal particles brought about by the
addition of a chemical reagent (a coagulant). Alum Sulphate will be dosed for this coagulation
purpose.
Stage 3: Flocculation
Flocculation process corresponds to the agglomeration of destabilized particles into
microfloc, and later into bulky floccules which can be settled, called floc. The introduction of
flocculants aid may promote the formation of flocs. The chosen and commonly used reagent
is an anionic polymer (sold in powder form).
This step requires a slow mixing tank (50 to 200 rmp).
Stage 4: Sedimentation
The main purpose of settling is the separation technique most often used for TSS colloid,
collected in the form of flocs after the coagulation and flocculation processes
Sludge is composed of all the flocs settle on the bottom of the sedimentation tank. Sludge is
extracted from this tank: 18h/day, and 7d/week; and will be sent to a special treatment for
sludge, generated from water treatment.
Stage 5: Sand filtration
The use of rapid sand filter is a technique widely used in drinking water
The purpose of sand filtration is to clear water by a physical removal of suspended solids
(sludge) by passing through a medium (or more). A two layers filter, using two different
media characteristics, is preferred to avoid the screening effect of a heterogeneous layer and
to promote the penetration of impurities throughout the entire dept of the filter.
The filter materials used have two layer and this are: anthracite and sand layer. The water flow
is directed downwards, passing through the anthracite layer then the sand layer. The coarse
particles are retained in the sand layer. A cleaning of the filter should be performed regularly
to avoid clogging and bacteria growth. Backwashing is carried out with air and chlorinated
waters.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
28
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Stage 6: Disinfection by chlorination
In this stage, water flows from the sand filter to the chlorination tank. In this tank; chlorine is
added to the water and allowed to settle for some time.
Chlorine is usually used in this stage because it is commonly applied to water for
activation for most harmful micro-organisms.
Water Demand and Sludge treatment
Water demand in the project area is estimated based on year 2025 estimate. The present
population (based on 2006 Population Census figures) and nature of agricultural water
demand was major considerations. Table 2.4 presents the water demand estimate and actual
land proposed for treatment plant in each of the three (3) project areas.
Table 2.4: Water Demand and Treatment Plant Land Take
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ITIGIDI
CuM/Day
Water Demand
Treatment Plant
Land Area
PROJECT AREA
OBUBRA
OKPOMA
5,102
10,280
275M x 200M
350M x 250M
4,893
275m x 200M
Sludge treatment must serve for the most to reduce these by-products in volume. The low
organic load of raw waters induces a low fermenting capacity: a digestion process or a
conditioning process is not required.
The chosen sludge treatment consists of:
 A thickening by settling: sedimentation and homogenization of raw sludge
which produces a sludge that is still fluid;

A dewatering on drying beds: natural drainage.
o
Thickening
The thickening process corresponds to an increase in the concentration of total solids
(sludge) collected in the settling
tanks. The sludge laden suspension is fed into a
tank, where it remains for a lengthy retention time so that the sludge is compacted. The
more concentrated sludge is extracted from the bottom, while the supernatant liquid is
drawn off the top.
o
Dewatering on drying beds
The use of drying beds requires no energy input and does not require much attention
(maintenance). Only the natural phenomena of evaporation, drainage, perspiration can
increase the dryness of the sludge.
 Sludge should be made toxic free for plant growth, and used as fertilizer for
agricultural purposes.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
29
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Outbuildings
Within each plant area the following ancillary structures/equipments shall also be
considered as part of the project.






A security post
A headquarter building for offices and workshop.
A chemical storage buildings (reagent building and chlorine building),
An electrical building.
A technical building.
The necessary ancillary works as internal roads, fence, drainage, telemetry,
lighting etc
Table 2.5 describes the proposed treatment process, with particular emphasis on the
activities on waste/sludge generation. The table indicates the daily water intake and sludge
production for each of the three (3) LGAs of project influence. Water intake for the facility
is approximated by the daily water production quantity. Similarly, quantities of reagents used
for water treatment which generate waste are also given.
As seen table 2.5, when the proposed treatment plants are fully operational in 2035, Obubra
LGA would generate the highest amount of sludge (1,291kg per day), then Abi LGA , with
(637kg per day) and finally Yala LGA (573 kg / day).
Table 2.5: Estimation of total Sludge generated during the project period
Abi
Water
Treatment
Process
Reagents
Preoxidation
Primary
Treatment
Plant
Coagulation
Flocculation
Sedinmentation
Sand Filteration
Disinfection
Sludge
Treatment
Thickening
2025
2035
2025
2035
2025
2035
Water
Intake
5102
11887
10280
24517
4893
11815
1.7
3.9
3.4
8.1
1.5
3.5
67
157
136
324
59
139
23.4
54.5
47.1
114.4
20.4
48.3
0.7
1.1
1.5
2.2
0.6
1
0.6
1.4
0.6
1.5
0.6
1.4
752
-
342
-
Lime
(m3//day)
Chlorine
(Kg/day)
Alum
Sulphate
(kg/hr)
Aniomic
Polymer
(Kg/hr)
Rising
Velocity
(m/hr)
Back Wash
Water (m3)
Chlorine
(kg/day)
(Kg/day)
376
Total Dry Sludge (Kg/day)
Sustainable Development Consultants
Yala
Year
Dewatering on bed
Earthguards Limited:
Obubra
25
59
51
121
22
52
1004
1340
2,012
2717
904
1205
36
-
-
74
33
-
637
30
1,291
573
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
3
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
BASELINE INFORMATION
This chapter gives an overview of the total project area of intervention and a visual imagery of
the three (3) project sites in Cross River State. This imagery shows the various communities to
be impacted by the project and various infrastructures of the proposed water scheme.
3.1
General overview
Nigeria is situated in West Africa and bordered to the north by Niger republic; north east by
Chad; west by Benin; east by Cameroon and south by the Atlantic Ocean. The land mass of
Nigeria is 923,768 sq km, and lies between latitudes 40 00’ N and 140 00’ N, and longitudes 20 50’
E and 140 45’ E.
Cross River state is a coastal in nature and located in the South Eastern Nigeria. This state was
created in May 1967 from the former Eastern Region. It occupies 20,156m2 and shares
boundaries with Benue state to the north, Enugu and Abia states to the west, Cameroon
Republic to the east and Akwa-Ibom state and the Atlantic Ocean to the south.
Abi LGA
This project area comprises of Itigidi town and 12 communities (Table 2.1). Itigidi town serves as
the headquarters of Abi L.G.A of Cross Rivers State. Itigidi town is located between latitude 050
53.083'N and longitude 80 8.25'E. The town is situated at upper course bank of the Cross River.
Abi L.G.A had a population of 78,117 people (NPC, 2006). It has a clustered settlements pattern
with scattering adjourning villages. The town accommodates a water pump station and treatment
plant for the CRSWBL along the Old Park area and a reservoir along Hospital road.
Access to Itigidi town is through the Ugep-Ediba-Itigidi road that branches off the Calabar-Ikom
highway at Ugep. Until recently, this road stopped at Ediba town, and Itigidi town could only be
reached by ferry or speed boat: however the recently-commissioned bridge across the Cross
River has made it possible to access Itigidi town by road.
Obubra LGA
Obubra town is about 175km north of Calabar with access through the Calabar – Ikom road
from Apiapum. Obubra LGA has a population of 102, 294 people (NPC, 2006). Obubra Town,
the headquarters of the Obubra L.G.A, is located about 175km North of Calabar, the State
capital. Access to Obubra is through a branch off from the main Calabar-Ikom highway, at
Apiapum.
Obubra people are predominantly farmers and produce food crops such as garri, yam, groundnut
and maize.
Obubra can be classified as a semi-urban town and has a linear settlement pattern; with houses
aligning along the main road. Obubra town has a record of being previously connected to the
water board mains.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
31
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Yala LGA
The project area in Yala LGA comprises of Okpoma town (LGA headquarters) and 11 other
communities (see table 2.1). Okpoma town is situated along the major road from Ogoja to
Abakaliki (capital of Eboinyi state), with a long stretch out of linear settlement along the road.
Yala Local Government Area is carved out of Ogoja province and is situated approximately
300km North of Calabar and 20km from Ogoja. It has a population of 79, 400 people.
Yala people are predominantly farmers and a little of small scale salt mining. It has many salt
ponds which are of historic importance to the Yala people. The surrounding villages include
Olachor, Itega, Okpodu, Alachor, Woleche etc.
Figure 3.1: Map of Nigeria showing the vegetation of Cross River State
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
32
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
3.2
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Physical Environment
Geology
The Coastal Plain of Cross River state is generally characterized by sandstones with lenses of
clay and gravel. The major aquifers are mainly sandstone.
Cross River state is blessed with abundant surface water (natural lakes, artificial reservoirs
ponds, small perennial streams, springs and rivers) and ground water. The vast majority of
the rural people obtain water for domestic use from the rivers, streams and wells. Ground
water resources may vary depending on the location. On the coastal plain, in Akpabuyo,
Calabar Municipality and part of Odukpani, there are excellent aquifers.
Calabar and other major towns of Ogoja, Obudu, Ikom and Obubra are served by piped
borne water from rivers and boreholes manned by the CRSWBL. Apparently, Cross River
State occupies the catchments of River Cross which crosses down the Cameroon Mountain,
across the flat-lying Cross River Basin, into vast estuary located along the Southern NigeriaCameroon boarder.
Climate
The state is situated in the tropical rain forest belt, characterized by monsoon rains, with dry
periods in the part and a periodically dry savannah climate in the northern part. The mean
annual rainfall in Cross River is 3,300 mm, of which about 70% occur during the months of
June to October.
The mean daily maximum and minimum temperature varies between 21.oC to 32oC in
January and 25.05oC and 27.4oC in July and August respectively; the relative humidity ranges
between a maximum of 98% throughout the year and a minimum of 60% in February; the
average monthly evaporation ranges between 4.3 mm/day in February and 2.3 mm/day in
July.
Vegetation
The vegetation of Cross River State is made up of tropical forest and the mosaic forest
vegetation for most part of the southern areas which also extends to Itigidi, Obubra and
Okpoma, while Ogoja has a combination of savannah and forest vegetations.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
33
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Agriculture
The state has one of the most richly endowed agricultural lands in Nigeria. Natural rubber,
pineapple and palm oil are already established plantation products and the main raw materials
export in the state. Cocoa, soya beans, food crops such as cassava, yam, rice, plantain, banana
and maize are produced in abundant quantities.
Transport
Cross River State enjoys excellent road network with the rest of Nigeria. It has a direct road
link with the middle belt and the north-eastern part of the country. Its location on the southeastern extremity of the country, almost entirely isolated by rivers, warrants the maintenance
of good road networks.
The two major road transportation arteries are the east-west Ikang-Calabar-Itu road and the
north-south Calabar-Ikom-Yola road which are both currently in a state of disrepair. Cross
river towns have good intra-city transportation, in addition to a good system of inter-city and
inter-local government transportation. Sometimes canoes, tree trunks and ropes are the only
means used by the local people to cross large rivers in remote settlement.
On the coastal plain, in Akpabuyo, Calabar Municipality and part of Odukpani, there are
excellent aquifers. Calabar and the other towns of Ogoja, Obudu, Ikom and Obubra are
served by piped water from rivers and boreholes manned by the Cross River State Water
Board Limited.
Population Structure and Distribution
Cross River State has a total population of 2,888,966 people with 1,492,565 Males and
1,396,501 Females spread across the 18 LGAs of the state.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
34
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Table 3.1: Population distribution of Cross River State
S/n
S
Local Government Area
Population
Male
Female
1
Yala
210,843
107,310
103,533
2
Bakwara
105822
54585
51237
3
Ogoja
171901
89805
82096
4
Obanliku
110,324
53,710
56,614
5
Obudu
160106
83479
76,627
6
Boki
186141
97926
88215
7
Etung
80196
42636
37560
8
Ikom
162,383
83,009
79,374
9
Obubra
172444
89375
83069
10
Yakurr
196450
100399
96051
11
Abi
144802
73976
70926
12
Biase
169183
89737
79446
13
Akamkpa
151125
79443
71682
14
Odukpani
192444
103526
88918
15
16
Calabar South
Calabar Municipal
191630
179392
95399
91208
96231
88184
17
Akpabuyo
271395
140329
131066
18
Bakassi
32385
16713
15672
Source: National population Census, 2006
Economy
The Cross River State economy is predominantly agricultural based and is sub-divided into
two sectors:
 The public sector: run by the Cross River State Government and features large
plantations and demonstration farms.
 The private sector: dominated by local subsistence farmers
The main crops are cassava, rice, plantain, banana, yam maize and palm produce.. Major
livestock in the state are goats and sheep while organized cattle ranching takes place at the
Obanliku at the Obudu Cattle Ranch.
Tourism
The outstanding tourist events and places in Cross River include:
 the soaring plateaus of the mountain tops of Obudu;
 the rainforest of Afi, from the Waterfalls of Agbokim;
 the spiraling ox-bow Calabar River;
 the Tinapa Business Resort;
 Calabar Marina;
 the Ikom Monoliths;
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
35
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes



Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
the Mary Slessor tomb;
the Calabar drill Monkey Sanctuary, and
the Kwa and Agbokim Waterfalls.
Environmental Issues in Cross River State
As in most part of Southern Nigeria, the major environmental problems are soil degradation,
urban air and water pollution, and rapid urbanization.
3.3
Baseline Data Analysis
In order to prepare the Environmental Social Impact Assessment of this project, baseline
data of the project areas was collected. This was with a view to determining the ambient
environmental and social conditions of the project communities. This serves the following
purposes:
 Necessary for identifying critical environmental aspects that may impair project
sustainability
 Helps to measure/evaluate/compare the performance of the project during project
operation stage.
 It helps to determine the suitable mitigation measures that will be applied to the
environmental impacts of the project.
Therefore, the following baseline data aspects were collected:
 Air quality
 Physiochemical quality of surface and underground water
 Noise level
 Climatic data
 Socio-economic data
 Vegetation and endangered species.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
36
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
3.3.1 Analysis of Surface and Underground Water Samples.
Table 3.2: Obubra LGA Project Area: Water Quality Result
Source: Fieldwork 2009
Parameters
Temperature
FEPA /WHO
Permissible limit
for boreholes
FEPA/WHO
Permissible
limit for
streams
Ofodua
waterside
Obubra
maintown
borehole
Owakande
obubra
tream
Adun
Beach
bore hole
Ogada
obubra
stream
Ofodua
obubra
borehole
< 40
< 40
28.2
30.5
29.2
30.8
28.4
28.2
PH
6.5-8.5
6.0-9.0
6
6.5
5.5
6
5.5
6
Colour
15 TCU
NA
CLEAR
CLEAR
NA
CLEAR
NA
CLEAR
Odour (NT)
ABSENT
NA
Absent
Absent
NA
Absent
NA
Absent
Conductivity
50-125
50-125
511
122
58.2
745
35.8
511
Salanity %
0
0.1
0.2
0.4
0
0.4
0
0.2
Filtreable
solid
Dissolved
oxygen
Total
dissolved
solid
30
30
0.0079
0.0067
0.0114
0.0069
0.0078
0.0079
7.5
6.8
3.6
4.5
4.3
2.1
5.3
3.6
1
2000
244
58
27
358
17
244
Sulphate
500
500
0.015
400
51
0.022
14
0.015
Chloride
250
600
0.001
0.255
3.24
0.017
8.65
0.001
Nitrate
10
20
3.11
5.8
8.95
4.6
13.58
3.11
Total
Hardness
Phosphate
200
200
64.2
65.8
60
40.15
17.12
64.2
< 1.0
5
0.019
0
0
0.012
0.1
0.019
Phosphorus
0.1
1
0.006
0
0
0.009
0.03
0.006
Aluminum
0.2
0
0.001
0.012
0.041
0.029
0
0.001
Mn
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.044
0.013
0.033
0.036
0.06
Pb
0.01
0.003
0.027
0.049
0.051
0.004
0.003
Temperature: Temperatures were generally permissible across the sampled stations in Obubra LGA.
pH: The water samples were generally slightly acidic and not permissible for drinking :
Colour: The result shows that the sampled waters were clear.
Conductivity: All the stations except Ababene stream had permissible values for conductivity.
Salinity: Samples from Ababane stream, Obubra maintown borehole, Adun beach borehole and Ofodua borehole
were above the permissible limit, while those within permissible limit are Ofodua water side borehole, Owakande
stream and Ogada stream.
Dissolved oxygen (DO): All the samples from this area were not permissible.
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD): All the samples, except Adun-beach borehole were permissible.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
37
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Hardness: All the sampled water bodies in this area are permissible in terms of hardness.
Phosphate: All the sampled water bodies in this area are permissible in terms of phosphate content.
Ammonia: Ammonium was not detected in the samples.
Metals: All the heavy metals were within the permissible limits across the sampled locations, except cadmium,
which values were not permissible in Adun-Beach borehole.
Coliforms: Salmonella was present in the water samples from Ababene stream, Adun-Beach borehole and Ofodua
borehole, bur absent in the rest of the samples. Shigella sp was absent in all the samples, while E.Coli was absent in
all but Ofodua stream.
Table 3.3. Abi LGA Project Area: Water Quality Result
Source: Fieldwork 2009
Parameters
Temperature
PH
Colour
Odour (NT)
Conductivity
Salinity %
Filterable
solid
Dissolved
oxygen
Total
dissolved
solid
Sulphate
Chloride
Nitrate
Total
Hardness
Phosphate
Phosphorus
Aluminum
Mn
Pb
FEPA
/WHO
Permissible
limit for
boreholes
< 40
6.5-8.5
15 TCU
ABSENT
50-125
0
30
FEPA
/WHO
Permissible
limit
for streams
< 40
6.0-9.0
NA
NA
50-125
0.1
30
Ekureku
Bore
hole
Adadama
Bore
hole
Ebgoronyi
Ekureku
Bore hole
Egboronyi
Ekureku
pond
Imina
Spring
water
Abi
Borehole
Itigidi
Plant
treated
water
Ababene
Obubra
stream
36
6.5
CLEAR
Absent
510
0.2
0.007
29.1
5.5
CLEAR
Absent
826
0.4
0.0197
23
5.5
NA
NA
30
CLEAR
0.035
29
4.5
NA
NA
10
0
0.0335
28.8
4.5
CLEAR
Absent
9.3
0
0.0023
28.7
5.5
CLEAR
Absent
530
0.3
0.0089
28.6
5
CLEAR
Absent
48.9
0
0.0091
31
7.5
NA
NA
500
0.4
0.0243
7.5
6.8
3.6
3.6
4.5
4.2
5.3
4.5
6.7
4
1
2000
244
397
4
5
4
253
23
383
500
250
10
200
500
600
20
200
0.015
0.001
3.1
64.2
0.005
0
5.11
34.24
0.052
0.041
5.15
15
0.056
0.043
8.19
20.45
0.004
0.001
0.058
17.12
0.003
0.008
2.98
56.36
0.007
0.009
3.05
36.12
47
11.42
10.52
56.36
< 1.0
0.1
0.2
0.05
0.01
5
1
0
0.05
0.01
0.006
0.001
0.06
0.003
0.008
0.003
0
0.012
0.004
0.029
0.018
0.032
0
0.01
0.023
0
0.031
0
0.005
0.042
0.014
0
0.02
0.003
0.05
0.02
0.001
0.057
0.016
0.034
0.014
0.004
0.048
0.026
0.017
0.006
0
0.044
0.03
Temperature: Temperature was generally permissible across the sampled stations.
pH: pH were acidic for Adadama borehole, Egboronyi borehole, Egboronyi pond, Imina stream, Abi borehole and
Ekureku borehole are normal/permissible for Itigidi treatment plant water.
Colour: The result shows that the sampled waters were clear.
Conductivity: Samples from Egboronyi, Imina and Itigidi Water Treatment plant are not permissible. Those
permissible include: Ekureku borehole, Adadama borehole and Egboronyi borehole
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
38
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Salinity: Samples from Ekureku borehole and Adadama borehole are above the permissible limits. Those within
permissible limit include: Egboronyi pond, Imina stream and Itigidi treated water plant
Dissolved oxygen (DO): The DO values were high, hence permissible for aquatic life for samples from Imina
spring and Itigidi treatment plant. All other samples were low, and not permissible.
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD): All the samples, except Abi borehole and Itigidi treatment were within
permissible limits.
Hardness: All the sampled water bodies in this area are permissible in terms of hardness.
Phosphate: All the sampled water bodies in this area are permissible in terms of phosphate content.
Ammonia: Ammonium was generally permissible for all the samples.
Metals: All the heavy metals were permissible across the sampled locations.
Coliforms: Salmonella sp. was present in the water sample from Egboronyi pond and absent in all other samples.
Shigella sp. was absent across the samples, while E.Coli sp was only present in Adadama borehole water.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
39
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Table 3.4 Yala LGA Project Area: Water Quality Result
Parametes
FEPA
/WHO
Permissible
limit for
boreholes
FEPA/
WHO
Permissibe
limit for
streams
Idigbo
Borehole
Itet
a
pon
d
Ipuole
stream
Iyamoyo
ng Itega
stream
Ochoh
i
stream
Ochoc
hi
boreho
le
Enimi
ri
stream
Temperature
< 40
< 40
28.7
28.5
28.2
27.5
28.7
20.5
28.1
PH
6.5-8.5
6.0-9.0
5.5
4
7.5
4.5
5.5
6
5
Colour
15 TCU
NA
CLEAR
NA
NA
NA
NA
CLEAR
NA
Odour (NT)
ABSENT
NA
Absent
NA
NA
NA
NA
Absent
NA
Conductivity
50-125
50-125
1104
21.2
797
21.5
38
33
38.4
Salanity %
0
0.1
0.5
0
0.4
0.003
0.0022
0.45
0
Filtreable
solid
Dissolved
oxygen
Total
dissolved
solid
Sulphate
30
30
0.0096
0.0248
0.108
0.0022
0.006
0.0096
7.5
6.8
4
0.024
8
4.1
4
4.1
5.1
2.7
5
1
2000
535
10
383
100
17
58
18
500
500
0
0.036
47
0.75
65
0.025
49
Chloride
250
600
0.001
0.034
11.42
0.45
5
0.517
5.003
Nitrate
10
20
3.2
12.16
10.52
14.21
10
4
10.22
Total
Hardness
Phosphate
200
200
40.2
40
56.36
50
4.5
140.11
40
< 1.0
5
0
0.01
0.017
0.03
1.05
0.015
0.45
Phosphorus
0.1
1
0
0.003
0.006
0.01
0.15
0.01
0.15
Aluminum
0.2
0
0.015
0.029
0
0.2
0.04
0.02
0.041
Mn
0.05
0.05
0.032
0.025
0.044
0.025
0.003
0.035
0.033
pb
0.01
0.029
0.01
0.03
0.002
0.175
0.055
0.174
Source: Fieldwork 2009
Temperature: The Temperature was relatively lower which is attributed to the wet and rainy season. The
minimum and maximum temperature of 20.5 0 C and 36 0 C across the project areas are normal for tropical waters
and falls within WHO permissible limits of 40 0C.
pH: The pH values along sampling stations in Idigbo borehole, Itega pond, Ochochi stream and Enimiri River are
below WHO/FMEnv permissible limit of 6-9. These water samples are acidic while the water samples from
Ipuole stream and Ochochi borehole are within permissible limit for drinking water.
Colour: Colour of water from the boreholes in this area are generally clear (less than 16 TCU^ WHO/Canadian
permissible limit) while those from streams and river are not clear. This can be attributed to the human activities
around the water bodies.
Conductivity: The permissible limit for conductivity by FMEnv/WHO is 50 -125. Values recorded from the field
in Yala showed high values for Idigbo borehole sample while the rest of the sampling stations where within
permissible limits.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
40
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Salinity: Idigbo borehole is slightly above limit (not permissible). Similarly, samples from Ipuole stream and
Ochochi borehole are above permissible limit. However, those within permissible limit are Itega pond, Itega
stream, Ochochi stream and Enimiri River. This explains why the villagers have abandoned the use of water from
those boreholes.
Dissolved oxygen (DO): The maximum limit for DO (WHO/FMEnv) is 7.5. Samples from Ochochi stream and
Enimiri River are permissible, while the rest of the sample water bodies fall below permissible limit, hence not
permissible.
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD): WHO maximum permissible limit for COD in fresh/surface water is 250.
COD is not permissible for Idigbo borehole and Ochochi borehole, while the rest of the sampling points are
permissible for drinking.
Hardness: Permissible limit for Total Hardness is 75-150mg/L. All the sampled water bodies in this area are
permissible in terms of hardness.
Phosphate: All the sampled water bodies in this area are permissible in terms of phosphate content..
Ammonia: Ammonium is generally within permissible limit across sampled water bodies in Yala LGA, but absent
in Itega stream.
Metals: All the heavy metals were permissible across the sampled locations, except cadmium, which values were
not permissible in Idigbo borehole and Enimiri River.
Coliforms: Under this compound are Salmonella sp, Shigelle sp and E.Coli. These bacteria are not permissible in
domestic used water.
All the 3 bacteria species are absent in Idigbo borehole sample, Enimiri River, and Ipuole stream. Salmonella sp. was
present in Itega pond, Itega stream, Ochochi stream and Ochochi borehole. Shigella sp was confirmed present in
Itega stream.
The outcome of the water analysis in the three project areas indicate that the water sources
being depended at present for drinking are harmful. The results are summarized as follows:

For Okpoma project area, the waters are characterized by low inorganic/organic dissolved
substances, considering chemical oxygen demand, dissolved oxygen, salinity acidity and
presence of microbial coli forms,

Itigidi project area shows significant presence of microbial flora and acidity; as well as high
concentrations in conductivity, salinity and dissolved oxygen,

Obubra project area shows significant presence of microbial flora and acidity; as well as high
concentrations in salinity and dissolved oxygen.
As a conclusion of water analysis, a required treatment plant would be composed of the steps listed in
section 2.5.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
41
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Analysis of Soil Samples
Table 3.5: Yala LGA Project Area: Physio-Chemical Quality of Soil
Parameters
FEPA
permissi
ble limit
Temperatue
(0C)
PH
≤ 40
34.5
6.0-9.0
4.5
0.1
0
50-125
12.9
2.7
Salanity
(%)
Conductiviy
(μS/cm)
TDS
Soil from
Ochochi
borehole
500-3500
Organic
Matter
Colour
(Munsell)
Soil from
Ochochi
Okpoma
stream
27.2
Soil from
Enimiri river
Soil from
Olugbuni
Iega
Soil from
IpuoleUtukpo
Soil from
OregrigriIdigbo
34.2
32
35.4
34.4
6
4
10
5.5
10
0.1
0
0
0
0
2.7
13
19
3
6
1
1
5
9
1
5.21
5.6
5.6
5.5
10.12
9.3
Brown (4/4)
Brown (4/4)
Dark red (3/6)
Reddish
Brown (2.5/1)
Hue 7.5 YR
Hue 7.5 YR
Hue 10 YR
Hue 10 YR
Reddish
Brown
(4/4)
Hue 5YR
Sulphate
500
dark
reddish
brown
(3/3) Hue
7.5 YR
0.21
0.18
0.18
131
107.1
0.19
Phosphate
5
5.2
4.9
4.9
8.3
6.8
0.06
Phosphorus
1
1.73
1.55
1.56
2.8
2.26
0.02
Chloride
200
3.46
2.62
2.62
12
10.4
2.95
Nitrate
54
39.2
29.9
29.2
114
106.5
33.4
Nitrite
1
0.24
0.21
0.21
0.6
0.52
0.21
1.96
2.36
2.36
4.2
1.01
3.3
0.49
0.55
0.59
1.4
0.25
0.83
Calcium
Magnesium
5
Manganese
5
Ammonia
1.06
0.75
0.85
2.7
2.56
0.91
0.079
0.02
0.07
0.1
0.1
0.07
0.02
Aluminum
0.2
0.029
0.02
0.02
0.1
0.1
Cadmium
0.01
0.329
0.13
0.13
1.9
1.74
0.2
5.2
4.4
4.4
12
9.9
0.45
Potassium
Silver
< 0.1
0.53
0.45
0.45
1.2
0.97
0.45
Lead
< 0.1
1.16
0.93
0.93
2.5
2.27
1.02
Iron
3
0.33
0.3
0.3
0.7
0.57
0.3
Copper
0.05
0.42
0.39
0.39
1
0.74
0.33
Zinc
< 0.1
0.123
0.02
0.08
0.4
0.42
0.09
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.18
0.4
0.34
0.17
Sulphide
Source: Field Work 2009
3.3.2 Soil Sample Analysis
Yala LGA Project Areas
Temperature: The ambient temperature in this area is within the permissible limit for a tropical
environment.
Hydrogen ion Concentration (pH): The result shows varying pH values, and can be attributed to certain
human uses and chemical applications on the soils. The FEPA permissible limit is 6-9.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
42
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Only the sample from Ochochi stream area fall within the permissible limit. Acidic soils included those of
Ochochi borehole area, Enimiri River farm site and Ipuole site. The soils that have concentrations of
alkalinity are from Olugbuni-Itega and Oregrigri-Idigbo village.
Phosphate: This is one of the major components of fertilizer and exceeds permissible limit of 1 for soils
from Ochochi, Itega and Ipuole in Yala project areas.
Phosphorous: Soils from Ochochi borehole site, Ochochi stream site, Enimiri, Olugbuni-Itega stream site
and Ipuole stream sites where above the permissible limit.
Sulphate: All the tested soil samples fall within permissible limit.
Nitrate: Higher nitrate concentration (above standard limit) was recorded for the samples Olugbuni-Itega
and Ipuole. All other samples in Yala project area were within standard limit for nitrate.
Potassium: Highest potassium value of 11.7 was recorded from Olugbuni-Itega, and the lowest value of
4.4 was recorded for samples from Ochochi and Enimiri River sites. There was no limit available for this
parameter from WHO/FMEnv.
Cadmium: Cadmium is a harmful metal, and FEPA sets the limit at 0.01. The entire soil samples except
Ochochi borehole site and Ochochi stream site were within permissible limit.
Lead: The standard limit for this metal in soil is <0.1. However, all the soil samples exceeded the limit.
Copper: Copper content were high in all the sample sites.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
43
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Table 3.6: Obubra Project Area: Soil Quality Result
Parameters
FEPA
permissible limit
Obubra
main
town
Soil from
Egboronyi
Ekureku 2
Soil from
Adun
beach
borehole
Soil
from
stream
Ogada
Soil from
Owakande
Soil from
Ofodua
borehole
Soil from
Iyamoyong
35
Soil from
a farm
near
Ababane
stream
31.4
Temperature (0C)
≤ 40
34.4
34
34.9
32
35
30
PH
6.0-9.0
6
10
4
Salanity ( %)
0.1
0
0
2.8
6.5
5.5
6.5
4
7.5
0
0
0
0
0
Conductivity
(μS/cm)
TDS
50-125
56.9
8
0
56
8.7
42
2.8
8.7
500-3500
27
4
1
104
4
12
1
54
Organic Matter
4.62
7.3
3.27
0
8.4
4
3.2
3.4
Colour (Munsell)
Block
(2.5/1)
Very dark
grey (3/1)
Dark yellow
Brown
Black
(2.5/1)
Dark brown
(3/4)
Dark Brown
(3/4)
Hue 5 YR
Hue 5 YR
93/6) Hue
10YR
Hue 5 YR
Hue 7.5 YR
Reddish
Brown
(2.5/1)
Hue 10YR
Sulphate
500
0.21
0.1
0.98
0.2
1.5
12.1
Dark
yellow
brown
993/6
)Hue 10
YR
6
Phosphate
5
5.1
0
20.7
5.1
33
5.8
2.8
32.8
Phosphorus
1
1.7
0
6.9
1.7
11
2.2
2.9
1.75
Chloride
200
3.36
0.1
31
1.1
2.2
0.4
30
2.18
Nitrate
54
37.1
0.1
1.59
18
2.7
16.5
2.5
2.65
Nitrite
1
0.25
0.1
1.25
1.5
2
0.59
1
1.95
1.22
2.4
1.68
0.8
1.6
1.05
1.7
0.83
Calcium
Hue 7.5 YR
1.5
Magnesium
5
0.31
0.6
0.42
0.3
0.4
0.85
0.4
2.4
Manganese
5
1.06
0.4
1.38
1
2.2
2.06
1.4
2.19
Ammonia
0.08
0.1
0.39
0.1
0.7
0.01
0.4
0.66
Aluminum
0.2
0.03
0
0.36
0.4
1.2
0.1
0.4
1.2
Cadmium
0.01
0.31
0.1
1.38
0
2.2
1.73
1.4
2.19
5.4
1.7
25.4
0
46
9
0.4
5.5
Potassium
Lead
< 0.1
1.1
3
1.09
0.5
1.7
0.23
1.1
1.6
Lead
< 0.1
1.1
3
1.09
0.5
1.7
0.23
1.1
1.6
Iron
3
0.33
1.3
1.28
0.6
1.9
0.5
1.3
1.85
Copper
0.05
0.45
2.3
2.16
0.4
3.2
0.74
1.8
3.15
Zinc
< 0.1
0.12
1.3
0.97
0.1
1.5
0.22
1
1.9
Sulphide
0.2
0.21
0.1
1.07
0.2
2
0.07
0.1
0.86
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
44
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Obubra LGA Project Areas
Temperature: The ambient temperature in this area is within the permissible limit for a tropical
environment.
Hydrogen ion Concentration (pH): The result shows varying pH values, and can be attributed to certain
human uses and chemical applications on the soils. The FEPA permissible limit is 6-9.
The samples from Obubra main town area, Ogada stream site, Farm land near Ababene stream and
Iyamoyong site fall within the permissible limit. Acidic soils included those of Adun Beach Borehole site,
Owakande site and Ofodua borehole site. The soils that have concentrations of alkalinity are from a farm
land in Egboronyi- Ekureku and Adadama stream site.
Phosphate: This is one of the major components of fertilizer and exceeds permissible limit of 1 for the
soil sample from a farm near Ababane stream. Samples from Obubra main town and Ogaga stream sites
were slightly above the standard limit.
Phosphorous: Soils from Obubra main town, Adun Beach site, Ogada farm site, Owakande Borehole site,
Ababane stream site, Ofodua borehole site and Iyamoyong junction farm site are above standard limit.
Sulphate: All the tested soil samples fall within permissible limit.
Nitrate: All the tested soil samples fall within permissible limit.
Potassium: Highest potassium value of 45 was recorded from Owakande farm site while the lowest value
of 0.002 was recorded from Ogada stream site.
Cadmium: All the soil samples except Ogada stream site were above standard limit for cadmium.
Lead: The standard limit for this metal in soil is <0.1. However, all the soil samples exceeded the limit.
Copper: Copper content were high in all the sample sites.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
45
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Table 3.7: Abi Project Area: Soil Quality Result
Parameters
Temperature
(0C)
PH
FEPA
permissible limit
ITIGIDI
Soil from Adadama
Eteni spring
Soil from
Akarafor
Soil from
treatment plant
Soil from
Egboronye
Soil from
Imina hill
top
≤ 40
6.0-9.0
34
34.3
34
34
Salanity ( %)
0.1
10
4.5
5.5
6
7.8
Conductivity
(μS/cm)
TDS
50-125
0
0
0
0
0.01
500-3500
6.8
12.9
7.5
8
18.6
3
6
3
3
60
23
5.21
1.1
1
23
Hue 7.5 YR
Black
(2.5/1)
Hue 7.5 YR
5
0.9
Dark Reddish
BROWN
(3/3) Hue
7.5YR
0.21
Black (2.5/1)
500
Yellowish Brown
(5/6)
Hue 10 YR
79
79
Dark reddish
brown
(3/3) Hue 7.5
YR
200
Organic
Matter
Colour
(Munsell)
Sulphate
Phosphate
Phosphorus
28.9
1
17
5.2
6.8
7
5.5
Chloride
200
5.7
1.73
2.3
2
3.4
Nitrate
54
27
3.46
6.4
6
6.2
Nitrite
1
1.6
39.2
69
69
40.1
Calcium
1.1
0.24
0.4
0
0.54
Magnesium
5
1.2
1.96
1.8
2
1
Manganese
5
0.1
0.49
0.5
0
0.78
Ammonia
4.9
1.06
1.8
2
2
Aluminum
0.2
0.4
0.08
0.1
0
0.28
Cadmium
0.01
0.3
0.03
0
0
0.07
1.2
0.33
1
1
0.01
Potassium
Silver
< 0.1
23
5.2
8.3
8
2.2
Lead
< 0.1
0.2
0.53
0.8
1
0.12
Iron
3
4.7
1.16
1.8
2
0
Copper
0.05
1.2
0.33
0.5
0
0.12
Zinc
< 0.1
2
0.42
0.7
1
0.01
0.2
0.9
0.12
0.3
1
0
Sulphide
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
46
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Abi LGA Project Areas
Temperature: The ambient temperature in this area is within the permissible limit for a tropical
environment.
Hydrogen ion Concentration (pH): Only the sample from Imina hill top fall within the permissible
limit. Acidic soils included those of Akarafor borehole site, Itigidi treatment plant area and Egboronye site.
Only the soil from Adadama spring area was biased towards alkalinity.
Phosphate: This is one of the major components of fertilizer and exceeds permissible limit of 1 for the
soil sample from a farm near Ababane stream. Samples from Obubra main town and Ogaga stream sites
were slightly above the standard limit.
Phosphorous: Soils from Obubra main town, Adun Beach site, Ogada farm site, Owakande Borehole site,
Ababane stream site, Ofodua borehole site and Iyamoyong junction farm site are above standard limit.
Sulphate: All the tested soil samples fall within permissible limit.
Nitrate: All the tested soil samples fall within permissible limit.
Potassium: Highest potassium value of .3 was recorded from Itigidi treatment plant and Egboronye site
samples, and the lowest limit (2.2) came from Imina hill top sample.
Cadmium: All the soils samples except that from Imina hilltop were above standard limit for cadmium.
Lead: The standard limit for this metal in soil is <0.1. However, all the soil samples except that of Imina
hilltop (Adadama Community) exceeded the limit.
Copper: The concentration of copper was permissible for Imina hill soil sample and high in all other
samples.
The fact that that many parameters were within standard limit in Imina hilltop site (Adadama community)
relative to other sites of soil collection, may be attributed to low human activities within the area due to its
altitude.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
47
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
3.3.3
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Air Quality/Meteorological and Noise Measurement
General Background
This is the report of air quality/Meteorological and Noise measurement for ESIA for CRSWBL proposed
water project covering Yala, Obubra and Abi LGAs.
This exercise was conducted between September 29th to October 1st 2009 in accordance with FMEnv
requirements using scientific and standard methods following regulatory requirements. A detail assessment
is shown in Table 3.9
Regional Climatic / Meteorological Characteristics
The overview of climatic/meteorological features (rainfall, air temperature, relative humidity, wind
direction/speed and sunshine) of the study area presented herein is based primarily on information from
literature research and field study.
Climatic Condition
The weather and climate of the entire Niger Delta area is closely tied to the general mesoscale trend in
Nigeria. It follows that the weather regime experienced at any given location in Nigeria during the year is
determined primarily by geographical location in relation to the fluctuating position of the Inter Tropical
Convergence Zone (ITCZ) (Ayoade, 1983). In this regard the predominant weather regime in the study
area is warm and humid.
The project area is within the humid tropical zone with defined dry (December – March) and wet (April –
November) seasons. The wet season is brought about by the South – West (SW) trade wind blowing across
the Atlantic Ocean. The dry, dusty and often cold North – East (NE) trade wind blowing across the
Sahara desert dominates the dry season and brings a short spell of harmattan. Data on the climatic
characteristics (rainfall, air temperature and relative humidity) of the area, collected over a 15 year period
(1990 – 2005) from the Nigerian Meteorological Agency (NIMET) synoptic centre Calabar is presented
below.
Relative Humidity
The mean monthly relative humidity of the study area is generally high and range between 71% and 88%
(Figure 3.2) with a mean of 87.6%. Higher humidity values are recorded in July / August corresponding
to the peak of the rainy season while lower values occur from December through February. The generally
high mean relative humidity recorded within the study area could be attributed to the: nearness of the area
to the coast; occurrence of cloud cover; influence of the moisture laden tropical maritime air mass; and
influence of the south-west trade winds which dominate the area.
Relative Humidity (%)
Relative Humidity (%)
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
Month
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
48
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Figure 3.2: Mean Monthly Relative Humidity in the Study Area
Temperature
The mean monthly temperature recorded across the study area for a period of 15 years was between 28.50C
and 33.30C. Daily air temperature does not vary significantly throughout the Niger Delta region and is
moderately high all through the year. The highest values are usually recorded at the onset of the rainy
season (late February and March) Figure 3.3.
Temperature (0C)
34
Temperature ( 0C)
33
32
31
30
29
28
27
26
Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun.
Jul Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
Month
Figure 3.3: Mean Monthly Temperature Variations within the Study Area
Rainy season commences in the study area around March and extends to November with July/August as
the peak months, while the dry season occurs between December and February, reaching its peak in
January when the harmattan wind sweeps across the entire area. More than 80% of the total annual rainfall
is received between the months of May and October. A short dry period (August break) occurs between
the last week of July and early August. The mean monthly rainfall over a 15 year period (1991–2005)
ranged between 9.9mm in December and 377.9mm in July as shown in Figure 3.4. The total annual
rainfall of the study area is in excess of 2,800mm.
Dec.
Nov.
Oct.
Sep.
Month
Aug.
Jul
Jun.
May
Apr.
Mar.
Feb.
Jan.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Mean Monthly Rainfall (mm)
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
49
350
400
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Figure 3.4: Mean Monthly Rainfall in the Study Area
Winds
The predominant wind direction in the area is south-west (SW) (210o - 240o) and this prevails for 8
months. Generally, wind speeds are between 1.5m/s and 2.0m/s and rarely exceed 2.5m/s. Wind speeds
were observed to be lower at nights compared to values recorded during daytime hours. The highest wind
speeds in the project area are recorded at the beginning of the rainy season - late March to early April.
Visibility
The weather in the project area on most days is cloudy owing to high relative humidity values recorded.
Fogs are formed in the morning hours impairing visibility to less than 1000m. In June through September,
being the most humid months, morning mist is usually prominent with visibility as low as 200m and
remaining below 2000m for a number of days thus constituting a serious hazard to transportation.
Generally, visibility, especially in the dry season is foggy in the early hours of the day and improves as the
day progresses.
Sunshine
The mean daily sunshine in the area is between 5 and 6 hours in the dry season and 3 to 5 hours in the wet
season. The area experiences a mean annual sunshine of 1,406 hours, which represents 31% of maximum
possible amount of sunshine in the environment. The lowest values of sunshine are recorded between July
and September with about 2 hours of sunshine per day due to greater amount of cloudiness in the sky.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
50
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Ambient Air Quality and Noise Level
Air Quality
The air quality assessment for the EBS of Cross River State Water Board (CRSWBL) proposed
water project in Itigidi, Obubra and Okpoma is presented hereunder. The study areas are
developed urban settlement with heavy transportation and industrial activities. Emissions from
automobile and motor bike exhaust are the major sources of air pollution in the area.
Air quality measurement was carried out in ten stations (PT1 – PT10) within the study area and
data presented in Table 3.8. The FMENV limits for air emissions have been included for
reference purpose.
Table 3.8: Meteorological Measurement for CRSWBL proposed water Project in Sept/Oct 2009
Sampling points
Ambient
Temp.
oC
Rel.
Humidity%
Wind
Direction
Wind
Speed
m/s
ITIGIDI(Old Treatment
Plant)
32.10
67.70
SW
0.40
1014.00
ITIGIDI Market
32.50
67.50
SW
0.50
1014.00
ITIGIDI Market( Entrance)
31.80
68.2
SW
0.50
1014.00
Adadama Reservoir Site
30.80
69.2
SW
0.90
1014.00
Proposed Treatment Plant
Site(Adun)
30.40
70.80
SW
0.40
1014.00
Adun Waterside(Village)
28.70
79.90
SW
0.60
1014.00
Apiapum Village
29.80
80.40
SW
0.50
1014.00
Old Reservoir(okpoma)
26.50
87.10
SW
2.50
1014.00
Ochochi Village(Okpoma)
30.00
64.90
SW
0.60
1014.00
Enimiri River (Idigbo)
29.60
68.90
SW
1.10
1014.00
Source: Field Survey, 2009
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
51
Atmospheric
Pressure(Pa)
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Table 3.9: Ambient Air Quality and Noise Characteristics in the Study Area
Parameters
Sample Station
Itigidi, Old Tm Plt
Itigidi Mkt
Pt3
Itigidi Mkt Entrance
Adadama Reservoir Site
Proposed Treatment Site
(Adun)
Adun Wtrside.
(Village)
Apiapum Village
Old Reservoir
Ochochi Village
Enimiri River Idigbo
FMENV
Guideline Concentration
(Daily mean of hourly values)
Coordinate
s
SPM
(g/m3)
CO
(ppm)
05053.083’
008001.356’
05053.232’
008001.405’
05053.317’
008001.342’
05055.122’
008004.993’
05059.822’
008015.357’
05059.694’
008015.564’
05059.796’
008016.826’
06041.650’
008045.236’
06037.393’
008040.452’
06039.533’
008035.802’
-
33.2
<0.1
11.7
SOx
(ppm)
NOx
(ppm)
H2S
(ppm)
CxHx
(%)
Noise
Level
(dBA)
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
79.9
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
53.9
17.2
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
55.9
11.2
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
55.6
11.5
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
60.9
10.3
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
65.7
11.7
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
74.7
36.2
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
95.8
11.2
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
62.1
11.5
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
57.0
150 - 230
10
0.04 –
0.06
0.1
-
-
90
Suspended Particulate Matter
Suspended particulate matter (SPM) is finely divided particles which can originate naturally or be
anthropogenic. It is present in ambient air in the form of dust, smoke and other aerosols. The most
significant of these are less than 10µm in diameter and thus in the respirable size range (Canter and Hill
1977, SIEP 1995). High concentrations of suspended particulate matter (SPM) are known to irritate the
mucous membranes and may initiate a variety of respiratory diseases. Fine particulates may cause cancer
and aggravate morbidity and mortality from respiratory dysfunctions (CCDI, 2001).
Also, it is known that dust coatings on leaf of plants reduces rate of photosynthesis and thereby reduces
plants growth. It is also known that animals or humans that eat plants coated with SPM containing
fluorides, arsenic, or lead may suffer some ill effects. SPM can also cause damage to materials by soiling
clothing and textiles, corroding metals (at relative humidity above 75%), eroding building surfaces, and
discoloring/destroying painted surfaces.
The SPM levels recorded within the project area ranged from 10.3µg/m3 to 36.2µg/m3. The low SPM
recorded in the area might be attributed to the time of sampling, low dust hays is usually recorded during
the wet season due to wash down. The recorded levels are well below the FMENV recommended limit
and thus do not pose any significant health effect.
However, the proposed project implementation would result in dust generation and air emissions from the
construction and operational phase of the water treatment plant. These may further lead to increases in
SPM level of the areas.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
52
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Carbon Monoxide
Carbon monoxide (CO) is a colorless odorless and tasteless gas produced by the incomplete combustion of
carbonaceous materials or fossil fuels – gas, oil, coal and wood. Adverse health effect has been observed
with carbon monoxide concentrations of 12 – 17ppm for 8 hours while prolonged (45 minutes to 3 hours)
exposure to concentrations of CO between 200ppm and 800ppm often results in severe headache,
dizziness, nausea and convulsions. However, the levels of CO recorded in the sampled areas were below
equipment detection limit (0.1ppm), indicating an area free from CO pollution.
Sulphur Oxides
Sulphur dioxide (SOx) is a colourless gas produced from biological decay and forest fire releases. It is also
produced from the combustion of sulphur-containing fuels, smelting, manufacture of sulphuric acid,
incineration of refuse and production of elemental sulphur. The gas is known to be a causative agent of
acid rain, it is harsh irritant and also capable of aggravating asthma, bronchitis and emphysema. It can also
cause coughing and promote impaired functions in the human system (CCDI, 2001). Also, sulphuric acid
aerosols (formed from dissolved sulphur dioxide) will readily attack building materials, especially those
containing carbonates such as marble, limestone, and mortar. Sulphuric acid mists can also damage cotton,
linen, rayon and nylon fabrics as well as paper. Excess exposure to sulphur dioxide accelerate corrosion
rates for many metals such as iron, steel, zinc, and copper, especially at relative humidity over 70% (Peavy,
et al, 1985). The colourless gas was not detected by the air pollutant equipment (detection limit 0.1ppm)
during the field sampling exercise.
Nitrogen oxides
NOx are reactive gases called nitrogen oxides or oxides of nitrogen, which are formed during combustion
processes. NOx results when fuel is combusted at high temperatures and occurs mainly from motor
exhaust and stationary sources such as electric utilities and industrial boilers (Canter and Hill 1977).
Nitrogen oxide is the only oxide of nitrogen that has been shown to have significant human health effects.
Exposure to concentrations higher than 0.5ppm (1mg/m3) can trigger changes in pulmonary function in
healthy people.
At the time of survey, the NOx levels in the ambient air of the study area were below the equipment
detection limit of 1.0ppm.
Hydrogen Sulphide
Hydrogen sulphide (H2S) is a toxic, odorous and corrosive gas, which is rapidly oxidized to SO2 in the
atmospheres. Its presence in the atmosphere could result from storage tank and process vents. Exposure
to concentrations in excess of 500ppm can be fatal (SIEP, 1995). H2S non-detection by the instrument
used suggests that no activity leading to significant emission of the gas was going on in the vicinity of the
study area at the time of survey. H2S level was below the equipment detection limit at the time of
sampling.
Hydrocarbons
These include methane (CH4), ethane (C2H6), propane (C3H8) and other derivatives of aliphatic and
aromatic organic compounds and are emitted from both man made and natural sources. Hydrocarbon
vapour in the atmosphere arise from fugitive emissions, vents and incomplete combustion of fuels,
particularly where fuel to air ratios are too high. Most members of this group are significantly toxic and
exposure to high concentrations in the atmosphere (about 1000ppm or more) could result in interference
with oxygen intake and acute leukemia.
Members of the hydrocarbon family were not detected by the instrument used, indicating that no activity
leading to significant hydrocarbon emission was taking place in the vicinity of the study area at the time of
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
53
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
this survey. The proposed project implementation will in no foreseeable way alter the ambient level of this
gas in the area.
Noise Level
Noise is a periodic fluctuation of air pressure and noise pollution is defined as “unwanted sound”. The
rate at which these fluctuations occur is the frequency, expressed in hertz (cycles per second). The range
of sound pressures encountered is very large and to keep numbers in manageable proportions, noise levels
are measured in decibels (dB) A, which have a logarithmic scale. In addition to causing a disturbance,
excessive noise can damage health and have physiological effects.
Environmental noise concerns focus on local communities and wildlife. Effects on local residents
generally relate to the annoyance / nuisance caused by both short-and long-term high sound levels. Also,
disturbance of wildlife is of significance particularly during breeding seasons.
Noise measurement was carried out in ten (10) locations. These include all the air quality sample locations
within the study area. The result of measurements is also presented in Table 3.9.
The results of measurements showed that noise within the study area ranged from 53.9(dB) A to 95.8(dB)
A. This result revealed that the noise levels were within the FMENV recommended limit all the sampled
locations except at PT8 (old reservoir along Okpoma road) due to vehicular traffic and followed by PT1
(Itigidi Treatment Plant). The use of ear protective equipment is recommended for people working within
this area as well as optimal maintenance of machines used in the area.
However, the level of noise in the project area will be amplified during construction activities of the
proposed project. This increase will however be short term and localized except around the treatment
plant area during the operational period.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
54
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
3.3.4
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Environmental Impacts from the Water Treatment Process
Table 3.10: Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Environmental Issues/Impact
Compositions/types
Treatment Process
Mitigation Measures
resulting in Impact
 Raw /surface water
 CRSWBL will minimize the quantity of solids generated through
Solid Waste/sludge:
This varies with the composition
 Settled suspended solids
of water source and treatment
 Used filtration membrane
process and may include:
 Sedimentation/

 Spent media

Radio nuclides,
 flocculation
 Where re-use/recycle cannot be applicable, sludge should be treated and

Lime
 Filtration & Disposal

Polymers,

microorganisms
Waste water:

Suspended solids and organics

Filter backwash

High levels of dissolved solids

Reject streams from membrane

High or low pH
filtration processes

Heavy metals

extraction

Raw /surface water
extraction
optimizing coagulation processes;
Sludge should be re-used/recycled if possible.
disposed by land application.
 Recycle filter backwash into the process, if possible
 Treat and dispose of reject stream, including brine in line with national
and local laws.

Brine streams from ion exchange or
Sedimentation/

CRSWBL will not discharge waste to surface water subjects
flocculation
demineralization
Hazardous chemicals

Risk of explosion

Chlorination,

Risk of fire

Sedimentation

Single acute exposure to

Flocculation
toxic, corrosive or oxidative

Storage of chemicals
 Store chlorine away from all sources of organic chemicals, and protect
from sunlight, moisture and high temperatures
 Minimize the amount of chlorination chemicals stored on site while
maintaining a sufficient inventory to cover intermittent disruptions in
substances
supply
 Develop and implement a plan for responding to accidental releases
 Install alarm and safety systems, including automatic shutoff valves, that
are automatically activated when a chlorine release is directed

Install containment and scrubber systems to capture and neutralize
chlorine should a leak occur.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
55
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental Issues/Impact
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Compositions/types
Treatment Process
Mitigation Measures
resulting in Impact
Air emissions
Ozone and gaseous or volatile
 Chlorination,
chemicals used for disinfection
 Sedimentation
processes such as chlorine and
 Flocculation
ammonia
 Risk of chlorine and ammonia releases can be mitigated
via the measures under hazardous chemicals

Install ozone destroying device (such as catalytic
oxidation, thermal oxidation) at the exhaust o of the
ozone reactor
Ecological impacts
Land/Soil pollution
 Waste/Sludge
disposal
 Storage and operation
of machines
/generator (causing
Chemical or diesel
leakage)
Water Pollution causing extinct of

aquatic lives
Raw /surface
 Sludge should be disposed only on the appropriate place
provided by the regulatory authority
 Sludge must be treated before disposal to land
 Equipment/generator must be properly maintained to
avoid leakage.
 3). Expired and left over chemicals should be carefully
handled/ disposed.
Sludge should not be disposed into the river
water extraction

Sludge disposal
into the river
Table 3.10 describes the activities and various environmental impacts associated with a water treatment plant and their mitigation measures.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
56
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
3.4
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Socio-Economics
3.4.1 Socio-Demographic Attributes of Respondents
A random sampling survey was carried out in the communities within the three (3) project local
government areas. Semi Structured Instrument (SSI) was administered to a total of 578 respondents. This
comprised of 195 for Abi, 201 for Obubra and 182 for Yala. Details of the analysis are contained in Table
3.12.
Table 3.11: Project Areas, their LGAs and Demographic Distribution
LOCATION
POPULATION
LOCATION
OBUBRA LGA
POPULATION
LOCATION
YALA LGA
POPULATION
ABI LGA
1
Ogada
6,574
Okpoma
64779
Itigidi
12397
2
Apiapum
1,461
Abachor
1522
Adadama
28924
3
Ofatura
5,549
Okpina
411
Agbara
9055
4
Ovonum
8,039
Idigbo
1448
Emin
1392
5
Ofodua
16,482
Adiero
1138
Egboroni
1752
6
Ogada 1
9,124
Woleche
706
Ekpon
1892
7
Iyamoyong
6,701
Udeyina
2722
Ekureku
8340
8
Ohana
5,163
Itega
2522
Anong
3259
9
Ofukapa
Iboko
232
Akarefor
3691
10
Ofat
7,619
Okpodu
1729
Akpoha
2755
11
Ababene
8,810
Utukpo Gabu
1730
Ngarebe
2973
12
Obubra
Station
Oyedama
5,490
Ipole
461
Akarefor
Esegeh
Likpoma
693
Adum
Beach
Ofunbonga
1
Ofunbonga
2
Ofunbonga
3
Ofunbonga
4
Obubra
1,461
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Total
291
4,696
1,041
292
1,162
6,360
5,979
102,294
79,400
Source: National Population Census, 2006
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
994
57
78,117
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Table 3.12: Socio-Economic Attributes of Respondent
Source: Field work 2009
Sample population
Sex
Religion
Marital Status
Av. No of wives
Size of household
Highest education
Amenities rating
Source of water
Earthguards Limited:
Male
Female
Christianity
Islam
Traditional
Others
Single
Married
Divorced
Widow
1
2 or more
3 and below
4 to 6
7 and above
None
FSLC
WASC
TCH/OND
HND/Degree
Road
School
Public Health
Portable water
33.7
86.7
13.3
92.8
0.5
4.1
3.05
10.8
80.5
1
4.6
68
32
7
42.6
50.4
20.5
28.7
16.4
8.2
5.6
Poor
Fair
Fair
Poor
34.8
88
12
93.5
0.5
6
0
13.9
79.6
0.09
4
65
35
15
37
47
25.3
28.4
20.4
12.9
5
Fair
Fair
Fair
Poor
31.5
85.7
14.3
100
0
0
0
14.3
77.5
3.3
3.3
60
40
8
45
48
28.6
25.3
24.1
7.1
3.8
Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Communication
Fair
Poor
Poor
Public recreation
River
Borehole (commercial
Pond/Stream
Borehole (private)
Poor
22.6
21.5
45.6
0
Poor
78.1
7.5
9
1
Poor
50
13
10.4
2.1
Sustainable Development Consultants
Category
33.3
86.8
13.2
95.4
0.3
3.4
1
13
79.2
1.46
3.97
64.3
35.7
10
41.5
48.5
24.8
28.4
20.3
9.4
4.8
Main Occupation
Annual Income
Source of energy
Cooking fuel
Type of toilet
Waste disposal
Willingness to pay
Maximum amount
Common Water
borne diseases
50.2
14
21.6
1
58
Farming
Trading
Civil Service
Self Employed
0-50,000
51,000-100,000
101,000-500,000
above 500,000
PHCN
Private generator
Hurricane lamp
Kerosene
Firewood
pit
Bush
Water closet
Bush
Organized collection
Open dump
Burning
Yes
No
N300
N500
N1000
Malaria
Typhoid
River blindness
Guinea worm
Diarrhoea
Cholera
67.7
7.5
12.8
6.2
51.8
10.8
14.4
2
20.5
3.1
76.4
20
80
25
65
10
78
0
12
10
98
2
22
68
10
High
High
Low
Absent
Low
Low
66.7
15.4
17.9
5.6
48.8
20.4
16.9
3
37.3
14
48.7
28
70
68
20
12
30
0
40
30
95
5
25
72
3
High
High
Low
Low
Low
Low
Yala
Item
Overall mean
Obubra
Percentage (%)
Abi
Yala
Category
Abi
Item
Obubra
Percentage (%)
86.3
7.2
9.3
9.3
79.3
10
8
1.7
10
12
78
14
86
12
80
8
92
0
8
0
100
0
56
44
0
High
High
Absent
Absent
Low
Low
Overall mean
73.6
10
13.3
7
60
13.7
13.1
2.2
22.6
9.7
67.7
20.7
78.7
35
55
10
66.7
0
20
13.3
97.7
2.3
34.3
61.3
4.3
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Sex
Table 3.12 shows that about 86.8% of the respondents in the 3 LGAs of project influence are
males while 13.2% are females. About 86.7% of respondents in Abi are males as against 13.3% for
females. About 88% of the respondents in Obubra are males as against 12% for females. In Yala,
85.7% of the respondents are males while 14.3% are females.
The general disproportionate in female representation is traced to:
 The survey technique in which head of household receives priority, while any other
member of household responds if the household head is absent.
 Cultural practices in which females especially married women are not permitted to grant
interview.
Age
The field survey was administered to mostly household heads or to their adult relations, for those
not present at the time of the survey. This informs that the field survey was biased towards adults
from 30 years and above and this implies that the respondents come from an age category
responsive enough to give detailed and valid data of their households and community.
Religion
The overall mean result shows that Christianity is the dominant religion in the 3 LGAs. The
practices of other religions are done by a few, and the overall mean representation is as follows:
 Christianity 95.4%
 Traditional worshipping: 3.4%,
 Islam: 0.3%
 Others (not identified): 1%
Table 3.12 gives other religious statistics of the three project areas as follows:
 Christians are dominant across board, but 100% of Christian worshippers is found in Yala
 Obubra has more percentage (6%) of traditional worshippers, while
 Other private religions are prevailant in Abi (3%).
Marital Status
Table 3.12 shows that the married persons are predominant among the respondents in all the
project communities (79.2%). The percentages of divorce persons and widows are low ((1.46 and
3.97 respectively). The statistic is approximately even in the 3 LGAs of project areas.
Years Lived in the Community
The field survey was administered to adults from 18 years and above. All the respondents are
indigenes of their respective communities. This shows that the respondents are well acquainted
with the socio-economic condition of the project areas, hence capable of given valid data.
Household Size
Table 3.12 shows a homogenous pattern of household sizes in the 3 project areas. The statistics
shows that:

There are predominantly large household size (7 and above) across the project
communities.

Households with 1-3 persons are highest in Obubra (15%) and lowest in Abi (7%)

Large household size is highest in Abi (50.4%) and lowest in Obubra (47%).
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
59
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
The above implies high consumption of goods, and particularly, high need for water consumption
in the project towns. It can also explain the reason for poverty in the area.
Highest Educational Qualification
The survey (Table 3.12) shows that:
 About 25% of the people of the 3 project areas are illiterates (did not attend primary school);
 The percentage of people that attempted/finished primary school is highest in Abi (28.7%);
 The percentage of those that attempted/finished secondary school is highest in Yala, while
 People that went to tertiary institutions are highest in Abi (5.6%) and lowest in Yala (3.4%)
Occupation
Farming is the predominant occupation in the 3 local government areas of project influence.
Other occupations practiced in the area are trading, civil/public service and self employment. The
survey shows that:
 Yala has the highest percentage of people whose primary occupation is farming (86.3), while
Obubra is least (66.7%)
 Obubra has the highest number of people in trading (15.4%), while Yala has the least number
(7.2%).
 The population of civil servants is highest in Obubra (17.9%) and lowest in Yala (9.3%).
 The percentage of people in self employment is highest in Yala (9.3%) and lowest in Obubra
(5.6%).
Annual Income
The overall mean outcome of the survey shows that the proportion of people on income of N0 –
N50,000 is predominant in the 3 project areas (60%), while those on income of N500,000 and
above is lowest (2.2%). This indicates that the project area is dominated by people of low
purchasing power.
However, being a rural and agrarian area, the low income has less influence on their ability to feed
their households and on their ability to respond to the proposed water utility bills.
Specifically the outcome of annual incomes in the 3 project areas is as follows:
 Yala is the most impoverished with 79.3% of the people living on income of N0 - N50,000.
 People on middle income of between N101,000 and N500,000 are highest in Obubra (16.9%);
the total frequency of 13.7% for the 3 project areas shows that the proportion is small.
 The result shows that very little proportion (2.2%) of the population in the project area lives
on annual income of about N1,000,000 naira and above. In terms of the 3 project areas;
Obubra has the highest proportion (3%), while Yala has the least (1.7%).
Source of Energy
The survey shows that the entire project area is connected to the national grid, although power
supply is sparingly across the project area. As a result of the unreliability of the public electricity,
the study shows that:
 Hurricane lamp is used by majority, while the highest frequency of this occurs inYala (78.7%),
and lowest in Obubra (48.7%)
 The use of private generator as main source of energy is highest in Obubra (14%), and lowest
in Abi (3.1%).
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
60
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
In terms of energy used for cooking;
 Fire wood is predominant in the 3 project areas; and its use is highest in Yala (86%) and lowest
in Obubra (70%)
 The use of kerosene occurs mostly in Obubra (28%) and lowest in.Yala (14%).
The predominant use of firewood has no significant effect on the project environment because:
 The area is a rainforest zone with tall trees,
 The woods in use are from farm sites, and
 Shifting cultivation is practiced over the project area, in a 4-year rotation basis, which helps for
natural re-vegetation.
Source of Drinking Water
The predominant source of water to the people of the project area is River, and serves about 50%
of the population. Other available sources are:
 Borehole (commercial and private);
 Stream; and
 Rain water.
The survey gives the following details of sources of water in the 3 project areas:
 Dependence on River water is highest in Obubra (78.1%) and lowest in Abi (22.6%);
 Commercial borehole service is highest in Abi (21.5%) and lowest in Obubra (7.5%);
 Dependence on stream or pond is most in Abi (45.6%) and lowest in Obubra ((9%), and
 Private borehole is owned by very few people in Obubra (1%) and Yala (2.1%).
It was found that households spend between N200 and N300 per day on the purchase of water
during dry season.
The underlying outcome of this section is that the project is feasible in terms of recovery of its
investment because water has an effective demand in the project area.
Willingness to Pay
The people of the 3 project areas are generally willing to pay for water supply (Table 3.12). The
highest amounts proposed to pay by the proposed consumers ranged from N200 to N1000. The
average statistic shows that:
 56% of the household consumers from Yala want to pay N300 per month and makes up the
highest number in favor of that sum in the 3 project areas.

the highest in favor of N300 and this proportion is from Yala;

72% of the proposed household consumers from Obubra are willing to pay N500 per
month.
 The percentage of households willing to pay N1000 and more per month is relatively small
occurring highest in Abi (10%) and lowest in Yala (0%).
The underlying outcome of this section is that the project investment outlay will be recovered
according to plan.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
61
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Waste Disposal Practice
Waste generated in the area is mainly domestic but lacks good waste management practices. Waste is
disposed in the bush via open dump. This includes both degradable and non-degradable byproducts.
Similarly, the predominant method of defecation is in the bush. This is common for the 3 local
government areas.
This finding is relevant for tracing the cause of some of the reported communicable disease, and
particularly important for identifying the relevance of training and awareness on sanitation and
hygiene during project implementation stage.
3.5
Health Impart Assessment
The outcome of the survey on health issues is shown on table 3.13 and shows the
following:
3.5.1
Obubra LGA Project areas




3.5.2
Abi LGA Project areas





3.5.3
The occurrences of Malaria and typhoid are high in this area and have led to several deaths of
people, and have also been a drain on the household’s income.
There are incidences of River blindness in this area, but the occurrence of River blindness is
presently reduced following intervention from the .National Onchocerciasis Control Programme
(NOCP).
Guinea worm was a common health challenge in this area but the occurrence has been
drastically reduced via the federal ministry of health’s intervention.
Vibrio- cholera is said to occur in children under 5 years old. This is a form of diarrhoea in
which patients experience frequent watery stool.
The occurrences of Malaria and typhoid are high in this area; leading loss of lives and incomes
The incidences of River blindness in this area are low.
Guinea worm was a common health challenge in this area but the occurrence has been
drastically reduced via the federal ministry of health’s intervention.
Vibrio- cholera is said to occur in children under 5 years old.
E.Coli sp related Dysentery occurs but with low frequency of incidences.
Yala LGA Project areas



The occurrences of Malaria and typhoid are high in this area; leading loss of lives and incomes
The incidences of River blindness are absent.
There is no current history of Guinea Worm in this area.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
62
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes


Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Vibrio- cholera is said to occur in children under 5 years old. Poor hygienic condition including
drinking of bad water could be a major cause of Vibrio- choleric.
E.Coli sp related Dysentery occurs but with low frequency of incidences. Unhygienic human
activities and waste disposal within sources of drinking water or edible items could cause E.Coli
sp Dysentery.
Table 3.13: Pattern of Health Impact Assessment
Indicators High
Malaria
Typhoid
Guinea
worm
Cholera
Dysentery
River
blindness
Abi
Low
Key:
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
Absent
High
Obubra
Low
Absent
-
High/ Major occurrence
Low/rare
Absent
63
High
Yala
Low
Absent
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
4
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
POLICY, LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
The following policy and regulatory frameworks guided the preparation of this ESIA:
4.1
World Bank Safeguard Policies

The World Bank has ten (10) Safeguard Policies to reduce or eliminate the adverse negative effects
of development projects, and improve decision making. Details on the World Bank Safeguard
Policies are presented in Appendix 1.
With respect to this report, the following World Bank safeguard policy applies:
Environmental Assessment (OP/BP4.01)
The above-mentioned policy is reviewed below with regards to its applicability and implication.
OP/BP4.01: Environmental Assessment
This is a process whose breath, depth, and type of analysis depend on the nature, scale and potential
environmental impact of the proposed project. It evaluates a project’s potential environmental risks
and impacts in its area of influence; examines project alternatives; identifies ways of improving
projects selection, siting, planning, design, and implementation by preventing, minimizing,
mitigating, or compensating for adverse environmental impacts and enhancing positive impacts;
and includes the process of mitigating and managing adverse environmental impacts throughout
project implementation. The World Bank favours preventive measures over mitigatory or
compensatory measures, whenever feasible.




4.2
Environmental Assessment takes into account the following:
natural environment;
human health and safety;
social aspects, and
trans - boundary and global environmental aspects.
Nigeria’ Regulatory Framework
With regards to management of the bio-physical environment throughout Nigeria, the overall
responsibility was held by the now defunct Federal Environmental Protection Agency (FEPA), which was
absorbed into the Federal Ministry of Environment (FME) in 1999. The State Environmental Protection
Agencies or, as the case may be, State Ministries of Environment performs this function at state and local
levels.
4.2.1
The Federal Ministry of Environment. (FMEnv)
The FMEnv’s mandate includes the establishment of federal water quality standards and effluent
limitations, protection of air and atmospheric quality; protection of the ozone layer; control the discharge
of hazardous substances; inter alia and ensures that all major development projects in Nigeria are subject
to mandatory Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) pursuant to EIA Act. No. 86 (Decree No. 86) of
1992.
In the FMEnv, there is an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Division, headed by a Director, to
take all responsibility for EIA related issues. Also the EIA division in the FMEnv is the Impact Mitigation
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
64
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Monitoring (IMM) branch, with a special responsibility for monitoring the implementation of
Environmental Management Plans (EMP) contained in the approved EIAs.
As contained in FEPA Acts 58 of 1988 and 59 of 1992. FME has put in place statutory documents to aid
the monitoring, control and abatement of industrial waste. The statutory documents currently in place
include:















National Policy on the Environment 1999
National Environmental Protection (Effluent Limitations) Regulations (S.1.8) 1991 ;
National Environmental Protection (Pollution Abatement in Industries and Facilities Generating
Wastes) (S.1.9) 2004;
National Environmental Protection (Management of Solid and Hazardous Wastes) Regulations
(S.1.15) 1991;
Guidelines and Standards for Environmental Pollution Control in Nigeria 1991;
Sectoral Guidelines for EIA 1995
Harmful Wastes (Criminal Provisions) Decree No. 42, 1988;
National Policy on the Environment, 1989;
Environmental Impact Assessment Procedural Guidelines 1995;
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Act No. 86 of 1992; and
Environmental Impact Assessment (Amendments) Act 1999.
National Guidelines and Standards for Water Quality 1999
National Guidelines on Environmental Management Systems (EMS) 1999
National Guidelines on Environmental Audit in Nigeria 1999
These statutory documents clearly state the restrictions imposed on the release of toxic substances into the
environment and the responsibilities of all industries whose operations are likely to pollute the environment.
Such responsibilities include provision of anti-pollution equipment and adequate treatment of effluent before
being discharged into the environment.
The FMEnv has put in place procedural and Sectoral guidelines detailing the EIA process including a
categorization of environmental projects into Categories I, II and III (referred to by the World Bank as
categories A, B and C respectively). This project has been categorized as FMEnv -Category II or World
Bank Category B.
These guidelines require that a complete EIA be performed for Category I projects. Category II projects
may not require an EIA depending on the screening criteria, while Category III projects do not require an
EIA.
The Sectoral guidelines on infrastructural development apply to this project. This water pipeline
rehabilitation and installation project is classified as a category II project.
ESIA’s are then submitted to the EIA Division of the FMEnv for approval and monitoring of the project
during implementation and operation based on an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) in the ESIA.
4.2.2 International Guidelines and Conventions on Environment which Nigeria is signatory

The United Nations Environmental Guidance Principles: This was adopted during Stockholm
Convention on 16 June 1972. The principal objective of this convention was to provide guidelines (27
in number) for protecting the integrity of the global environment and the developmental system.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
65
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes

Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer: The protocol was adopted in
1987 as an international treaty to eliminate ozone depleting chemical production and consumption. The
protocol also called on industrialized countries to provide technical and financial assistance to
developing countries and hence led to the Multilateral Fund for the Implementation of Montreal
Protocol (MFMP).

United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity: This convention was signed into law during
the Rio Earth Summit in 1992. The convention places general obligations on countries to observe
sustainable use and equitably share the plants and animals of the earth.

United Nations Convention on Climate Change: The convention was signed in 1992 during the Rio
Earth summit but put into force in 1994. The convention calls on developed countries and economies
in transition to limit her emissions of the green house gases which cause global warming, although it
does not impose mandatory emissions on developing countries.

Convention to Regulate International Trade in Endangered Species of Fauna and Flora: This
convention was signed into law in 1973 during the Washington summit and restricts the trade of fauna
and flora species termed as endangered organisms.

Convention on Conservation of Migratory species of Wild Animals: This convention also known
as the Bonn Convention of 1979 stipulates actions for the conversation and management of migratory
species including habitat conservation.

Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer: This convention was instituted in 1985
and places general obligation on the countries to make appropriate measures to protect human health
and the environment against adverse effects resulting from human activities which tend to modify the
ozone layer.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
66
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
5
POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS
5.1
Introduction
This chapter presents an analysis of the potential impacts assessment methodology, an analysis of the
potential positive and negative impacts and risk prediction associated with the proposed Water Distribution
and Supply Schemes Project in Itigidi (Abu LGA), Obubra (Obubra LGA) and Okpoma (Yala.LGA).
5.2
Assessment Methodology
The proposed Construction of Water Distribution and Supply Schemes Project impacts identification /
assessment were carried out based on the National, World Bank and ISO 14001 (Environmental
Management System) framework, knowledge of the project environment, project activities and professional
judgments. The approach adopted is schematically articulated in Figure 5.1 while details were given in
section 1.5.
Source
Impact Assessment Source References
Baseline data
and Project
Activity
Description
Amelioration
Direct and
Indirect
Impacts
mitigation /
Impact
Impact Assessment
Reversible or
Irreversible
Incidents
Past Events
National EIA
Procedural
Guidelines
(FMENV 1995)
Impact
World Bank
Environmental
Assessment
Sourcebook (1991)
High Medium Low
Legal/ Regulatory
Requirements
Yes/No
Risk
Yes/No
Frequency
Yes/No
Importance
Yes/No
Public
Perception
Yes/No
Prevention
strategy for
significant impact
Reduction strategy for
significant impacts that
cannot be prevented
Figure 5.1: Impact Assessment Approach
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
ISO 14000
EMS
Guidelines
67
Control
strategy for
residual impact
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
5.2.1
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Impact Identification
This involves characterizing the existing baseline environment and components of the
development project which are likely to impact the environment. A checklist of the associated
and potential negative impacts from the water distribution project is presented in Table 5.1. The
impacts identified have also been characterized as reversible or irreversible, direct or indirect,
short or long term, permanent or temporary and cumulative as well as categorized as those under
CRSWBL control and those which they have, influence over.
Reversible Impacts: the ability of the environmental components to recover their value after a
disturbance.
Irreversible Impact: impacts that permanently impair on the environmental component of the
area.
Direct Impacts: these are impacts which follow as a direct cause-effect consequence of a
project activity.
Indirect Impacts: Are environmental effects that are at least one step removed from project
activity in terms of cause-effect linkages.
Residual Impacts: These are impacts that remain even after mitigation measures have been
applied.
Cumulative Impacts: Impacts arising from the interaction of project components or activities
with other activities of the past or those occurring simultaneously, or sequentially.
Beneficial Impacts: These are positive impacts.
Adverse Impacts: These are negative impacts.
Long Term: Those predicted adverse impacts which remain after mitigating measures have been
applied.
Short Term: Impacts that are removed after mitigating measures have been applied.
Impacts under CRSWBL Control: impacts the organization has sole responsibility for.
Impacts under CRSWBL Influence: Impacts related to items provided by third party
(contractor or supplier)
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
68
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Table 5.1: Impact Characterization
X
X
Land depletion
Risks of communal clashes during payment of
compensation
Depletion of land available for farming
X
X
Social
Increased risks of road traffic
X
X
Social
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Health
Increased heavy duty traffic on, and damage to
local roads
Release of SOx, COx, NOx, SPM into the
atmosphere thereby leading to pollution
Destruction of soil structure from heavy duty
equipment
Release of SOx, COx, NOx, SPM into the
atmosphere/water course, thereby leading to
pollution
Disturbance of aquatic habitats/wildlife due to
noise of heavy duty machines at construction site
Temporal obstruction to fish farming within the
immediate river bank
Noise nuisance to human and wildlife from
machines and equipment movements
Workplace accidents
X
X
X
Socio-economic
Employment of local labour
X
X
X
Water
Pressure on water resources/quantity due to
increased withdrawal
Access to treated portable water
X
X
X
X
X
X
Pollution
Land degradation
2. Construction
Pollution
Fauna
Socio-economic
Noise Impairment
3. Operation
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
69
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Outside CRSWB
control
Under CRSWB
Control
Residual
Adverse
Beneficial
Short term

Land
Acquisition

Mobilization
of men and
Equipment to site
Long term
Social
Irreversible
1. Pre-Construction
Associated & Potential Impact
Indirect
Environmental
Aspect
Direct
Project Phase and
activities
Reversible
Group of Activity: Intake and Weir
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
X
X
Land depletion
Risks of communal clashes during payment of
compensation
Depletion of land available for farming
X
X
Social
Increased risks of road traffic
X
X
Social
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Health
Increased heavy duty traffic on, and damage to
local roads
Release of SOx, COx, NOx, SPM into the
atmosphere thereby leading to pollution
Destruction of soil structure from heavy duty
equipment
Release of SOx, COx, NOx, SPM into the
atmosphere/water course, thereby leading to
pollution
Disturbance of aquatic habitats/wildlife due to
noise of heavy duty machines at construction site
Temporal obstruction to fish farming within the
immediate river bank
Noise nuisance to human and wildlife from
machines and equipment movements
Workplace accidents
X
X
X
Socio-economic
Employment of local labour
X
X
X
Sludge
Risk of Pollution of toxic stock from sludge to the
environment
Risk related to release of COx, NOx, via leakage of
oil/diesel from generator and/or from poor storage
of diesel.
X
X
Pollution
Land degradation
2. Construction
Pollution
Fauna
Socio-economic
Noise Impairment
3. Operation
Air/water Pollution
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
70
X
X
CRSWB
CRSWB
Under
Control
Outside
control
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Residual
X
X
X
Adverse
Beneficial
Short term

Land
Acquisition

Mobilization
of men and
Equipment to site
Long term
Social
Irreversible
1. Pre-Construction
Associated & Potential Impact
Reversible
Environmental
Aspect
Direct
Project Phase and
activities
Group of Activity: Treatment Plant
Indirect
Impact Characterization
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
X
X
Land depletion
Risks of communal clashes during payment of
compensation
Depletion of land available for farming
X
X
Social
Increased risks of road traffic
X
X
Social
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Health
Increased heavy duty traffic on, and damage to
local roads
Release of SOx, COx, NOx, SPM into the
atmosphere thereby leading to pollution
Release of SOx, COx, NOx, SPM into the
atmosphere/water course, thereby leading to
pollution
Disturbance of aquatic habitats/wildlife due to
noise of heavy duty machines at construction site
Noise nuisance to human and wildlife from
machines and equipment movements
Workplace accidents
X
X
X
Socio-economic
Employment of local labour
X
X
X
Pollution
2. Construction
Pollution
Fauna
Noise Impairment
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
71
X
CRSWB
CRSWB
Under
Control
Outside
control
Residual
Adverse
Beneficial

Land
Acquisition

Mobilization
of men and
Equipment to site
Short term
Social
Long term
1. Pre-Construction
Associated & Potential Impact
Indirect
Environmental
Aspect
Direct
Project Phase and
activities
Group of Activity: Water Storage Tank
Irreversible
Impact Characterization
Reversible
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
CRSWB
CRSWB
Outside
control
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Increased heavy duty traffic on, and damage to
local roads
Release of SOx, COx, NOx, SPM into the
atmosphere thereby leading to pollution
Destruction of soil structure from heavy duty
equipment
Release of SOx, COx, NOx, SPM into the
atmosphere/water course, thereby leading to
pollution
Disturbance of aquatic habitats/wildlife due to
noise of heavy duty machines at construction site
increase income via sale of food and water
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Health
Noise nuisance to human and wildlife from
machines and equipment movements
Workplace accidents
X
X
X
Socio-economic
Employment of local labour
X
X
X
Social
Increase road traffic during maintenance work
X
X
X
X
Social
Possibility of new development such as shops and
houses along the right of way of pipeline, causing
disturbance during rehabilitation work
X
X
X
X
Social
Pollution
Fauna
Socio-economic
Noise Impairment
Earthguards Limited:
Under
Control
X
Land degradation
3. Operation
Residual
Risks of communal clashes during payment of
compensation
Increased risks of road traffic
Pollution
2. Construction
Adverse
Social
Beneficial

Mobilization
of men and
Equipment to site
Short term
Social
Long term
1. Pre-Construction
Associated & Potential Impact
Indirect
Environmental
Aspect
Direct
Project Phase and
activities
Group of Activity: Pipeline Works
Irreversible
Impact Characterization
Reversible
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Sustainable Development Consultants
72
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
5.2.1 Determination of Impact Significance
An impact is said to be significant if it results in a change that is measurable in a statistically sound
sampling program and if it persist, or expected to persist, more than several years at the population,
community or ecosystem level (Buffington, 1976).
The determination of the significant associated and potential impacts of the proposed project was
based on the ISO 140001 (EMS) framework using the criteria below:
5.2.2.1
Legal / Regulatory Requirements (L) – Is there a legal / regulatory requirements or
a permit required?
0 = There is no legal/regulatory requirement
3 = There is a legal/regulatory requirement
5 = There is a permit required
The legal/regulatory requirements were identified based on the World Bank Safeguards Policy, IFC
performance standards and the Official Gazette of the Federal Ministry of Environment.
5.2.2.2
Risk (R) – What are risk / hazard rating based on risk assessment matrix (RAM)?
1 = Low risk
3 = Medium/intermediate risk
5 = High risk
The risks were ranked based on three criteria namely, consequence, probability of occurrence and
severity. These were determined using the RAM shown in Figure 5.2.
Probability
A
B
C
D
Consequence
s
i
E
Probability
Category
A
Possibility of Repeated Incidents
B
Possibility of Isolated Incidents
C
Possibility of Occurring Sometime
D
Not likely to occur
E
Practically Impossible
ii
iii
iv
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
Definition
73
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Considerations
Consequence
Category
i
ii
iii
Safety /Health
Public Disruption
Environmental Aspects
Financial Aspects
Fatalities / Serious
Impact on Public
Large
Community
High
Serious Injury to
Personnel /
Limited Impact on
Public
Medical Treatment
for
Personnel / No
Impact on Public
Minor Impact on
Personnel
Small
Community
Major/Extended Duration/Full
Scale
Response
Serious / Significant Resources
Commitment
Minor
Moderate / Limited Response of
Short Duration
Low
Minimal to None
Minor / Little or No Response
Needed
None
Medium
iv
Figure 5.2: Risk Assessment Matrix
5.2.2.3
Environmental Impact Frequency (F) – What is frequency rating of impact based on
historical data and expert judgment?
1 = Low frequency
3 = Medium/Intermediate frequency
5 = High frequency
The frequency of impact occurrence was determined using historical records of accidents/incidents,
fatalities, etc, and consultation with experts.
Importance of Affected Environmental Component and Impact (I) – what is rating of importance
based on consensus of opinions?
1 = Low importance
3 = Medium/Intermediate importance
5 = High importance
The importance of target environmental components on the potential impacts was determined
through consensus among the project stakeholders.
5.2.2.4 Public Perception (P) – What is the rating of public perception and interest in proposed
project and impacts based on consultation with stakeholders?
1 = Low perception and interest
2 = Medium/intermediate perception and interest
5 = High perception and interest
Consensus of opinions among the project stakeholders was used to determine the public
perception/opinion on the potential impacts.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
74
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
The significant potential impacts of the proposed project (Table 5.2) were identified as those impacts
to which the following conditions apply.
(L + R + F +I + P) > 15
Sum of weight of legal requirements, risk factor, frequency of
occurrence, importance and public perception greater than or equal
to the benchmark (15)
(F + I) is > 6:
Sum of weights of frequency of occurrence and importance
of affected environmental component exceeds the
Benchmark (6).
P = 5:
The weight of the public perception/interest in the potential
impact exceeds the benchmark (5)
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
75
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Table 5.2: Checklist for Ranking of Associated and Potential Impacts
Project Activity
Land Acquisition
Land Clearing
Mobilization of men and
Equipment to site
Construction of Intake plant
Laying of primary Mains (inlet/outlet
pipes)
Installation of lift pumping machines
Withdrawal of raw water
Installation of generator and other
equipment
Construction of Water treatment Plant
and storage tanks
Construction of administration office,
security post and chemical storage
houses
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
Associated & Potential Impact
Risks of communal clashes during payment of compensation
Depletion of land available for farming
Destruction of the natural vegetation
Increased risks of road traffic
Increased heavy duty traffic on, and damage to local roads
Release of SOx, COx, NOx, SPM into the atmosphere thereby
leading to pollution
Destruction of soil structure from heavy duty equipment and civil
construction activities
Disturbance of aquatic habitats/wildlife due to noise of heavy duty
machines at construction site
Temporal obstruction to fish farming within the immediate river
bank
Risk of water reduction and disturbance to alternative water uses
Disturbance to occupational use of water such as fishing
Disturbance to aquatic habitation
Noise nuisance to human and wildlife from machines and equipment
movements
Risk of Workplace accidents
Risk of work place hazards/accidents
L
3
3
0
0
0
3
R
3
1
1
3
3
3
F
3
1
1
1
3
3
I
3
1
3
3
3
5
P
1
1
1
3
3
3
F+I
4
2
4
4
6
8
Total
17
9
10
14
16
25
Impact category
Significant
Insignificant
Insignificant
Insignificant
Significant
Significant
0
3
1
1
1
2
8
Insignificant
3
1
1
3
1
4
13
Insignificant
3
1
1
3
1
4
13
Insignificant
0
0
3
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
2
2
10
10
9
7
Insignificant
Insignificant
Insignificant
Insignificant
0
0
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
6
6
16
16
Significant
Significant
Risk of safety of the public
Air pollution resulting from emission of particulate matters,
0
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
2
6
6
21
Insignificant
Significant
Water pollution resulting from the release of CO2, and from leakages
of oil and gases into the underground and surface water courses.
Noise impairment for civil construction workers using heavy duty
equipment
Land/water pollution resulting from poor disposal practices of waste
water and sludge during operation
Risk of HIV/STD as a result of interaction of civil workers and the
community
3
3
3
3
3
6
21
Significant
3
3
1
3
3
4
17
Significant
3
3
3
3
5
6
23
Significant
0
5
3
3
1
6
18
Significant
76
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
5.3 Impact Network
The associated and potential impacts of the proposed water distribution and supply schemes project
in Itigidi, Obubra and Okpoma have been identified and evaluated / assessed in the previous
sections. These impacts have also been networked / linked (as articulated in Table 5.3) to determine
the magnitude of effects / severity.
Table 5.3: Impact Projection
Associated and potential
Impact
1st Degree Impact
Impact Projection
2nd Degree Impact
3rd Degree Impact
4th Degree Impact
Risks of communal clashes
during payment of
compensation
Depletion on land
available for farming
Loss of Asset / financial
losses
Disruption of project activity
Bad public Image
-
Reduction in Agricultural
produce
Injury and death / damage to
asset
Risk of increase in
price of foodstuff
-
-
Increased heavy duty
traffic on, and damage to
local roads
Release of SOx, COx,
NOx, SPM into the
atmosphere thereby
leading to pollution
Risks of accidents from
damaged roads
Injury /death and
damage to assets
Increased risk or respiratory
disorder
Risk of acid rains
Death
Destruction of soil
structure from heavy duty
equipment
Alteration of hydrological
regimes
Exposure of soil to
erosion resulting from devegetation and soil
movement
Employment of local
labour
Contamination of soils
from accidental fuel spills
Public and wildlife
disturbance due to noise
Reduction of soil aeration
Loss of medicinal herbs
and rare / endangered
plant species
Income generation to the
villagers from sale of food
and other consumable
items
Earthguards Limited:
Risks of flooding
Washing away ot top soil
nutrients
Income generation to the
people
Reduction in soil productivity
Risks of public agitation /
crisis
Reduction in wildlife reserves
Increased rate of ill-health
Improved standard of living
Sustainable Development Consultants
77
Destruction of plants
and corrosion of
structures
Reduced plant / crop
yield
Increased risks of
road traffic accidents
on local roads
Loss of manpower /
financial losses
Increased mortality
rate
Reduction in farm
produce
-
Removal of top
nutrients
Reduced plant / crop
yield
Reduced crop yield
Improved standards of
living
Reduced crop / plant
yield
Disruption of
operation
Reduced wildlife catch
to the local hunters
Increased mortality
rate
-
-
-
-
Bad public image
Low income
generation
Population decreases
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
5.4
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation measures (Table 5.4) for the significant associated and potential impacts of the proposed
project in Itigidi, Obubra and Okpoma were proffered based on professional judgment and
described in the context of the following:
5.4.1 Prevention: avoid the potential impact
5.4.2 Minimization: decrease the spatial / temporal scale of the impact through design, training of
physical barriers
5.4.3 Remediation: apply rehabilitation techniques after the impact has occurred
5.4.4 Compensation: accept the impact and compensate (monetarily or in other forms e.g. training,
offsite restoration, community development programs for natural resource management etc) as
appropriate
Table 5.4: con’td: Mitigation Measure
Environmental
Aspect
Associated
Impact
and
Potential
Land Acquisition
Risks of communal clashes
during
payment
of
compensation
Restriction on land available for
farming
Increased risks of road traffic
accidents on local roads
CRSWBL shall pay adequate compensation to land
owners
Increased heavy duty traffic on,
and damage to local roads
CRSWBL shall develop an effective journey
management plan
CRSWBL shall use competent and well trained drivers
certified in defensive driving
CRSWBL shall ensure all vehicles are periodically
maintained and records kept
Ecosystem fragmentation and
exposure if wildlife is to
increased exploitation
Destruction of soil structure
from heavy duty equipment
Reduction in oxygen available
in the atmosphere due to
deforestation
CRSWBL shall limit acquisition of land to the
minimum required for work
Mobilization of
men and materials
to site
Land Clearing /
stripping
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
Mitigation Measures
CRSWBL shall limit acquisition of land to the
minimum specified for project
CRSWBL shall develop and maintain an effective
journey management plan
CRSWBL shall limit movement of heavy equipment
to night hours
CRSWBL shall use competent and well trained drivers
CRSWBL shall ensure vehicles are periodically
maintained and records kept
CRSWBL shall limit clearing activities to the
minimum required for work
CRSWBL shall limit cutting / clearing of trees to the
minimum required for work
78
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Table 5.4 cont’d: Mitigation Measures
Environmental
Associated and Potential Impact
Aspect
Land clearing /
Release of gaseous pollutants
Stripping
(CO, SOx, NO, SPM, etc) from earth
moving equipment into the atmosphere
Contamination of soils from accidental fuel
spills during vehicle / equipment refueling
Public and wildlife disturbance due to noise
from earthmoving equipment
Loss of medicinal herbs and rare /
endangered plant species
Littering / pollution of the soil from
disposal of overburden / top soil
Provision of electricity to the community
through installation of generators
Employment of local labour
Inhalation of cement dust and toxic fumes
during building and welding of structures
Installation of
equipment and
Structures (offices,
workshop, etc)
Workplace accidents
Risks of personnel falling from heights
during installation
Waste
treatment
water
Generation of toxic residuals and pathogens
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Mitigation Measures
CRSWBL shall maintain all vehicles at optimal
working conditions
CRSWBL shall ensure vehicles are periodically
maintained and records kept
CRSWBL shall develop effective fuel storage and
handling procedures
CRSWBL shall use low noise generating equipment
for operation
CRSWBL shall maintain all vehicles at optimal
working conditions
CRSWBL shall ensure vehicles are periodically
maintained and records kept
CRSWBL shall limit land clearance to the minimum
required for work
CRSWBL shall activate waste management plan
CRSWBL shall store stripped overburden materials
to be used for pit reclamation
Electricity supply from the quarry shall be extended
to the nearest community where possible
Unskilled local hands shall be retained by CRSWBL
where the need arises in order to encourage them in
acquiring basic skills on self sustenance on
disengagement
CRSWBL shall ensure that all personnel at such
work area wear nose mask
CRSWBL shall ensure all personnel wear
appropriate PPE
CRSWBL shall ensure that contractors undertaking
work on its behalf comply with safety and health
plans
CRSWBL shall ensure safety awareness meetings
are held prior to work each day
CRSWBL shall ensure all incidents are documented
and corrective actions taken
CRSWBL shall ensure all gang ways are cleared of
obstruction during work
CRSWBL shall ensure all scaffolds are fit for
intended use
CRSWBL shall employ the use of competent and
well trained workers
All gang ways shall be cleared of obstruction
CRSWBL shall ensure that full compliance of the
waste management plan.
Disposal of sludge in land fill shall be prohibited;
and treated sludge shall be useful as manure for
agricultural uses
Sludge shall be sedimented and dewatered to get rid
of pathogens and toxics
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
79
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental
Aspect
Installation
of
equipment and
Structures (offices,
workshop, etc)
Associated and Potential Impact
Mitigation Measures
Risks of personnel electrocution
during welding operations
CRSWBL shall employ competent and well
trained welders
CRSWBL shall ensure all electrical wires are
insulated
CRSWBL shall maintain all vehicles and
internal combustion engines at optimal
working conditions
CRSWBL shall ensure vehicles are periodically
maintained and records are kept
CRSWBL shall adopt the use of water spraying
around work area to reduce of dust into the
atmosphere
Atmospheric pollutants emission
(SOx, COx, NOx, etc) into the
atmosphere from exhaust of
construction equipment
Storage of chemicals
and fuel/oil/diesel
Plant growth deficiency resulting
from reduced transpiration /
photosynthesis enhanced by coating
of leaves with dust particles during
the dry season
Destruction of natural landforms and
aesthetic beauty of the area
Risks of fire outbreak and explosion
from
accidental
ignition
of
detonators
Soil and groundwater contamination
from diesel and oil leaks and spills
Earthguards Limited:
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Sustainable Development Consultants
80
CRSWBL shall restrict ensure that land form is
restored/revegetated
CRSWBL shall locate fire extinguishers in
strategic areas and train personal in its use
CRSWBL shall ensure fuel storage are enclosed
within a bund wall
CRSWBL shall ensure periodic inspections of
tanks are carried out
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
5.5 Positive Environmental Impacts in the Locations
This sections looks at the main impacts identified, specifying these as much as possible
according to the various infrastructural developments anticipated. The positive impacts for
each phase are shown below.
Construction Phase
Increase in Business Opportunities and Employment:
 Local subcontracts from the contractor during the project.

Demand for labour for digging the trenches where pipes will be laid,
 Increased demand for food, drinks, and manufactured consumer products especially
telephone card from the construction workers.
Operation and Maintenance Phase
Social and Health Benefits:
 Water would become available for the people in the areas thus distance to source of
water will be shortened
 It will prevent or minimize time wastage by households in fetching water.
 Reducing workload of households members, especially women, involved in fetching
water. In addition,
 The incidence of water borne diseases especially diarrhea among children would be
reduced. This will help reduce child mortality.
 General improvement in sanitation will also lead to a healthy environment.
National Development:
 The project will alleviate poverty,
 It will enhance revenue generation of CRSG.
 Improve economic well-being and health conditions of the people and will
 Contribute to the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).
5.6
Potential Negative Impacts
An identification of potential impacts during the respective project phases is presented in
tabular format in Table 5.8. Furthermore a rating of potential impacts is presented. It is
noted that this rating is based on information that was gotten from the field survey.
Impact significance has been categorized into three classes;
 Low
 Medium
 High
The criteria applied for the three classes are largely based on the expected magnitude of
change caused by the project in combination with value/sensitivity of the receptor/resource.
5.7
Waste Water and Sludge Disposal
Sludge is to be treated and dried and be disposed in Local Authority registered landfill site
for this purpose.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Sledges are classified according to the type of water treatment process adopted which may
include:
 Non-Chemical Sludge: derived from treatment plant using biological method such as
micro strainers,, pre-settlement unaided by chemicals, membrane backwash and sand
washings from slow sand filters
 Coagulant sludge: arising from treatment plants using coagulation process.
The treatment works for this water schemes project in Itigidi, Obubra and Okpoma employ
coagulation, flocculation, clarification and filtration. In view of this, the projection of the
quantities of dry solids in sludge produced area function of raw water quality and the
chemical treatment being used.
Generally, the sludge composition for this project consists of:
 Coagulant hydroxide
 Suspended solids
 Precipitated colour
 Algae
 Iron
 Manganese
 Powdered activated carbon
 Impurities in lime and polyelectrolyte
Details of the types and sources of waste/sludge and applicable best treatment/disposal
recommendations are contained as follows:
Table 5.5: Sludge Treatment Process
Source of Waste
Operation Stage
Clarification sludge
Sludge Treatment Plant

Dross

Flushing

drainage washings,

Spillages
Process tank drainage
Main process overflows
Membrane plant or
chemically enhanced
backwash water
Media filter or membrane
filter wash water
Workshop waste
Chemical tank leakage and
spillage on delivery
Gas leakage from storage
or generation plants
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
Type of Waste
Regular batch discharges (0.1 3% w/v dry solids
Chemical wastes
Suspended solids
Settled sludge
Could contain low residual
chlorine and/or typically pH in
the range of 5-7
Acids
Chlorine, and
Alkali
Dry solids
Oil and grease
Concentrated chemicals
Chlorine, ozone, hydrogen,
carbondioxide, sulphate,
methane
Treatment/Disposal
The extracted sludge from the setting tanks will be
thickened and dewatered by spreading on drying
beds to reach 50% of dryness and disposed in the
EPAD designated landfill and/or can be used as
manure for agricultural purpose.
Discharge to water course subject EPAD consent
If necessary, dechlorinate and/or discharge to
neutralize
Dewater and send sludge to sludge treatment plant
Recycle to the system
No harm if discharged to water course
Neutralize and send to the sludge treatment plant
Recycle with/without settlement
Send settled solids to the sludge treatment plant
Collect for off site disposal
Contain in bunds and remove for off-site disposal,
using 3-way diversion valves
Apply Scrubbers (Cl2), Destructors (O3), dilution
and venting
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Source of Waste
Operation Stage
Commissioning Stage
Hydraulic testing water
Treated water
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Type of Waste
Treatment/Disposal
Discharge to a water course
Discharge to water course after
dechlorination if necessary.
Re-use if feasible
Water used for disinfecting water
Discharge to water course after
retaining structures
dechlorination if necessary
Re-use if feasible
Filter backwash water
Media fines
Settlement and discharge to a water
course.
Source: Twort’s Water Supply, 6th Edition (Don D. Ratnayaka, J. Brandit and Michael Johnson)
5.7.1
Free of contaminants
Chlorinated and may not be
compliant with treated water quality
standards
High chlorine residual
Estimation of the quantities of sludge
Estimation of the quantity of sludge for this project was made possible by estimating the
quantity of raw water collection which is approximated by the quantity (m3/D) of water
production. Water production on the other, is determined by any of the following:
a. Treatment plant capacity
b. Daily water production (which is a function of water demand and water losses).
Daily water production estimate was applied in this study to approximate the amount of raw
water intake, and shown as follows:
Table 5.6: Daily Water Production Rate
Year
2009
2025
2035
Key
Project Area
Water demand
(m3/d)
Obubra
Abi
Yala
Obubra
Abi
Yala
Obubra
Abi
Yala
(m3/d) = Cubic metric per day
5,463
2,747
2,581
8,224
4,082
3,914
19,613
9,510
9,452
Internal losses
(m3/d)
1,366
687
645
2,056
1,020
979
4,903
2,377
2,363
Total Water
Production
(m3/d)
6,829
3,434
3,227
10,280
5,102
4,893
24,517
11,887
11,815
Source: The Project Feasibility Report, 2009
5.7.2 Sludge Production Estimation
5.7.3
The quantity of sludge production for the proposed water schemes project in the three (3)
Local Government Areas of Obubra, Abi and Yala is as follows:
Sludge Production ( estimate: 2010-2025)
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Items
Daily operating
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Unit
h/d
l/s
m3/h
m3/d
g/ m3
Obubra
18
262
942
16,962
30
Abi
18
130
468
8,418
30
Yala
18
114
409
7,356
30
Kg/ m3
Kg/d
g/l
m3/d
m3/h
m3/d/filter
u/d
m3/d
m3/h
0.03
509
10
51
3
752
2
1,503
84
0.03
253
10
25
1
376
2
752
42
0.03
221
10
22
1
342
2
683
38
Concentration of backwash waters
g/l
1
1
1
Quantity of Total solid in backwash waters
Kg/d
1,503
752
683
Total sludge Production (Before treatment)
Kg/day
2,012
1,004
904
m3/hour
86
43
39
Production of sludge per m3
Production of sludge per day
Concentration of extracted sludge
Flow of extracted sludge
Water flow used for backwashing per litre
Number of filter backwash per day
Backwash waters
Table 5.7: Estimation of Total Quantity of Sludge
Source: The Project Feasibility Report, 2009
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
5.7.3
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Sludge Treatment
The sludge treatment process design and variables output are quantified as presented below:
STAGE
DESIGN CRITERIA
UNIT
OBUBRA
ABI
YALA
Thickening
Permissible load - maximum
Kg/ m3/d
50
50
50
Rising velocity - maximum
m/h
2
2
2
Retention time - maximum
h
48
48
48
Injection sludge - input
d/w
7
7
7
Dewatering on
drying beds
h/d
18
18
18
Extraction of sludge - output
d/w
7
7
7
Inlet sludge concentration
h/d
g/l
8
1.7
8
1.7
8
1.6
Total sludge - inlet
Kg/d
2,717
1,340
1,205
Volume – Sludge inlet
m3/d
m3/h
m3/d
week
d/w
h/d
m
week
m2/week
1,625
90.3
74
3
7
8
0.4
3
1,291
811
45
36
3
7
8
0.4
3
637
736
40.9
33
3
7
8
0.4
3
573
m2
%
Kg/day
Kg/year
3,872
50
1,291
471,049
1,910
50
637
232,335
1,718
50
573
209,002
Volume – sludge inlet
Drying time - min
Frequency of filling
Depth of a drying bed
Number of weeks before full discharge
Required area for 1 week
Total area required - theoretical
Dryness after drying
Total Sludge output (dry sludge)
Source: The Project Feasibility Report, 2009
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
5.8
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Potential impacts related to the Water Distribution and Supply Scheme in Abi, Obubra and Yala LGAs
Project activity group: Intake and Weir
TYPE OF IMPACT
(a) Land take
(a). Erosion
(b) Eco-system
Flora and Fauna
Solid Waste
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
Phase: Pre-construction
DESCRIPTION
IMPACT RATING
1. SOCIAL
This will deplete the quantity of land available for other uses in the project affected area. The impact may not be
Low
much as land required for permanent construction will not be significant as
2. ENVIRONMENTAL
The clearing of the natural vegetation may exposure the surface soil to erosion, and may adversely affect the
aesthetics of the project area. However, the impact is going to be site specific and area requirement small.
The eco-system may be adversely affected by the human activities such as clearing of vegetation, land
compartment and felling of trees.
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Project activity group: Intake and Weir
TYPE OF IMPACT
(a) Air pollution
(b) Water pollution
(c) Soil pollution
(d) Noise pollution
(a) Safety of the public
DESCRIPTION
1. POLLUTION
Air pollution will result from automobiles, light and heavy machines such as generators , and also from dusts
being raised during clearing of bushes and felling of trees
Burning of demolition and uprooted trees and grasses will also contribute to pollution.
Phase: Construction
IMPACT RATING
Moderate
Accidental spillage of fuel, lubricants and other chemicals may flow into surface waters leading to water
pollution. Also project activities may lead to turbidity in surface watercourses due to run off of sediments
resulting from increased erosion.
Leaching of the fuels from the machines and automobiles into the underground water will result into water
pollution.
Soil pollution may occur as a result of accidental spillage of fuels such as diesel. In addition, there may be fuel,
lubricants and other chemical leakages from improper storage facilities.
Moderate
Loud noise and vibrations may result from the use of equipment such as generators, vehicles, drilling machines
(in the case of burrowing) etc.
Moderate
2. SOCIAL
Constructions sites, in particular, excavations as well as transportation, movement of heavy equipment and
obstruction of roads may cause safety problems to the general public. The use of heavy equipment is expected to
be limited. On the other hand, manually executed works will last longer, resulting in prolonged safety risks.
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
(b) Aesthetics
(c) Land take
Earthguards Limited:
Furthermore, exposed trenches pose landslide hazards to humans and animals alike. The risk of such is common
in the case of clearing works near frequented public buildings such as schools and religious centers.
The aesthetics of the surroundings around the construction sites may be affected if not well managed. However,
constructions in this project will take place in semi-urban and rural areas with moderate viewpoint sensitivity.
Moreover, the impact is location specific and temporal.
The proposed construction of water intake tanks may result in the occupation of land used for other purposes
(residential, agriculture, business etc), and which can possibly not be used as such after implementation of the
works (e.g. because the ROW needs to be cleared of structures). The impact would be negligible, since most of
the pipes will be laid along existing ROWs and all persons that could be affected by the project have been
appropriately settled by the Cross River Sate Government.
Sustainable Development Consultants
Low
Moderate
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Project activity group: Intake and Weir
TYPE OF IMPACT
(a) Public health
(b) Health problems from
construction camps and
sites, and imported labour
(c) Occupational health
and safety
(a) Soil erosion
(a) Impacts on flora and
fauna
(b) Access due to
construction of pipeline
ROW’s through bush and
forest land
(a) Waste generation
DESCRIPTION
3. HEALTH
Given the tropical climate of Cross River State, stagnant water which may form in pits, holes, excavated
ditches etc, at construction sites may create a habitat for insect disease vectors such as malaria, which poses a
health concern to residents.
In the case of badly managed construction camps and work sites public health problems may occur, although
in this case it is not expected that large construction camps will be established, or that work sites will be large
enough to cause important hazards to the general populace. Also, in view of the magnitude of works, the
number of imported labourers may be quite low.
Construction works such as: excavations; working with heavy equipment; working in confined spaces;
working on and along the traffic roads; heavy lifting, storage, handling and use of dangerous substances and
wastes, working under noisy conditions will expose the workers to occupational health and safety risks
4. EROSION
Water pipeline construction for the network extension and rehabilitation of water will entail clearance of the
vegetation from site and the usage of heavy equipment for the work. The compaction of soil and loss of
vegetation cover tends to accelerate erosion activity leading to secondary impacts such as soil instability,
landslides in undulating landform and also surface water pollution due to runoff. Nevertheless most of the
pipeline construction activities will take place along existing roads and not undulating landforms thereby
reducing erosion impact to a minimum.
5. FLORA AND FAUNA
As the construction will require removal of natural vegetation for the proposed new pipeline extension which
may lead to habitat destruction of natural existing fauna. Although most of the new pipeline extension work
will occur along existing roads or ROWs with less bushes and shrubs removal making vegetation impact to be
low due to low ecological value. Some economical tree will be affected
In certain areas where the pipeline extensions require the creation of new ROW’s through forest land. This
might result in improved access to natural sites previously less accessible.
6. SOLID WASTE GENERATION
Waste will be produced by the removal of structures and vegetation in the right of ways of the pipelines.
Old, ruptured pipes will be removed from the pipelines for replacement. This will constitute massive solid
waste which will deface the landscape of the areas if not well managed.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
Phase: Construction
IMPACT RATING
Moderate
Low
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Low
Moderate
Moderate
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Project activity group: Intake and Weir
Phase: Operation and
Maintenance
TYPE OF IMPACT
(a) Livelihoods
(b) Conflicting demands
for water
(c) Eco-system
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
DESCRIPTION
1. SOCIAL
Given that water is constantly taken from the river/dams, resulting in reduction in the water
level especially during dry season, fishing and irrigation will be drastically affected.
Since water intake depends on river which reduce during dry seasons, there will be shortage
of water for distribution during this period, also water for irrigation and fish farming, etc. may
be depleted.
2. FLORA AND FAUNA
The indigenous flora and fauna are negatively affected by the reduction in the water level.
Impact Rating
M
M
M
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Project activity group: Water Treatment Plant
TYPE OF IMPACT
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
DESCRIPTION
1. POLLUTION
Air pollution will result from automobiles, light and heavy machines such as generators , and also from dust
being raised during clearing of bushes and felling of trees
Burning of uprooted trees and grasses will also contribute to air pollution
(a) Air pollution
Phase: Pre-construction
IMPACT RATING
Moderate
Moderate
(b) Water pollution
Leaching of the fuels from the machines and automobiles into the underground water will result in underground
water pollution.
Low
(c) Soil pollution
Soil pollution may occur as a result of accidental spillage of fuels such as diesel. In addition, there may be fuel,
lubricants and other chemical leakages from improper handling.
Moderate
(d) Noise pollution
Loud noise and vibrations may result from the use of equipment such as generators, vehicles, drilling machines
(in the case of burrowing) etc.
Moderate
(a) Safety of the public
(b) Aesthetics
© Land take
(d) Occupational health
(e) Soil erosion
Earthguards Limited:
2. SOCIAL
Constructions sites, in particular, excavations as well as transportation, movement of heavy equipment and
obstruction of roads may cause safety problems to the general public. On the other hand, manually executed
works will last longer, resulting in prolonged safety risks.
Moderate
The aesthetics of the surroundings around the construction sites may be affected if not well managed. However,
treatment plant constructions in this project will take place in secluded areas within semi-urban and rural areas
with moderate viewpoint sensitivity. Moreover, the impact is location specific and temporal.
Low
The proposed construction of Treatment Plants may result in the occupation of land used for other purposes
(residential, agriculture, business etc), which can possibly not be used as such after implementation of the works
(e.g. because the ROW needs to be cleared of structures). Details would be seen in the Abbreviated
Resettlement Action Plan (ARAP)
Construction works such as: excavations; working with heavy equipment; working in confined spaces; working
on and along the traffic roads; heavy lifting, storage, handling and use of dangerous substances and wastes,
working under noisy conditions will expose the workers to occupational health and safety risks
The clearing of vegetation, felling of tree and grading of the soil might expose the soil to erosion. However,
since the land coverage is small,, the impact will not be much.
Low
Sustainable Development Consultants
Moderate
L
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Project activity group: Water Treatment Plant
TYPE OF IMPACT
(a) Public health
(c) Occupational health
and safety
(a) Soil erosion
(a) Impacts on flora and
fauna
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
DESCRIPTION
3. HEALTH
Given the tropical climate of Cross River State, stagnant water which may form in pits, holes, excavated
ditches etc, at construction sites may create a habitat for insect disease vectors such as mosquitoes which
causes Malaria.
Construction works such as: excavations; working with heavy equipment; working in confined spaces;
working on and along the traffic roads; heavy lifting, storage, handling and use of dangerous substances and
wastes, working under noisy conditions will expose the workers to occupational health and safety risks
4. EROSION
Construction of the treatment plant will entail clearance of the vegetation from site and the usage of heavy
equipment for the work. The compaction of soil and loss of vegetation cover tends to accelerate erosion
activity leading to secondary impacts such as soil instability, landslides in undulating landform and also surface
water pollution due to runoff.
FLORA AND FAUNA
Construction will require removal of natural vegetation for the proposed treatment plant, which may lead to
habitat destruction of natural existing fauna.
Phase: Pre-construction
IMPACT RATING
Moderate
Moderate
Low
Moderate
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Project Activity Group: Water Treatment Plant
TYPE OF IMPACT
(a) Air pollution
DESCRIPTION
1. POLLUTION
Air pollution will result from automobiles, light and heavy machineries such as generators etc.
Phase: construction
IMPACT RATING
Moderate
Burning of wastes such as trees, paper, etc. will also contribute to pollution.
(b) Water pollution
Accidental spillage of fuel, lubricants and other chemicals may flow into surface waters leading to water
pollution. Also project activities may lead to turbidity in surface watercourses due to run off of sediments
resulting from increased erosion.
Low
(c) Soil pollution
Soil pollution may occur as a result of accidental spillage of fuels such as diesel. In addition, there may be fuel,
lubricants and other chemical leakages from improper storage facilities.
Moderate
(d) Noise pollution
Loud noise and vibrations may result from the use of equipment such as generators, vehicles, drilling machines
(in the case of burrowing) etc.
Low
(a) Safety of the public
(b) Aesthetic
(c) Land take
Earthguards Limited:
2. SOCIAL
Constructions sites, in particular, excavations as well as transportation, movement of heavy equipment and
obstruction of roads may cause safety problems to the general public.
Furthermore, exposed trenches pose landslide hazards to humans and animals alike. The risk of such is common
in the case of construction works near frequented public buildings such as schools and religious centers.
The aesthetics of the surroundings around the construction sites may be affected if not well managed.
The proposed Treatment Plants may result in the occupation of land used for other purposes (residential,
agriculture, business etc), and which can possibly not be used as such after implementation of the works (e.g.
because the ROW needs to be cleared of structures).
Sustainable Development Consultants
Moderate
Moderate
Low
Moderate
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Project Activity Group: Water Treatment Plant
TYPE OF IMPACT
(a) Public health
(c) Occupational health
and safety
(a) Soil erosion
(a) Impacts on flora and
fauna
(b) Access due to
construction of Water
Treatment Plants ROW’s
through bush and forest
land
(a) Waste generation
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
DESCRIPTION
3. HEALTH
Given the tropical climate of Cross River State, stagnant water which may form in pits, holes, excavated
ditches etc, at construction sites may create a habitat for insect disease vectors such as mosquitoes which
cause malaria.
Construction works such as: excavations; working with heavy equipment; working in confined spaces; heavy
lifting, storage, handling of wastes, working under noisy conditions will expose the workers to occupational
health and safety risks
4. EROSION
Water Treatment Plant construction will entail clearance of the vegetation from site and the usage of heavy
equipment for the work. The compaction of soil and loss of vegetation cover tends to accelerate erosion
activity leading to secondary impacts such as soil instability, landslides in undulating landform and also surface
water pollution due to runoff.
5. FLORA AND FAUNA
As the construction will require removal of natural vegetation for the proposed new treatment plant which
may lead to habitat destruction of natural existing fauna.
In certain areas where the Water Treatment Plant require the creation of new ROW’s through forest land, this
might result in improved access to natural sites previously less accessible.
6. SOLID WASTE GENERATION
Waste will be generated from the left over concrete and iron rods used during the construction of the water
treatment plants.
Phase: Construction
IMPACT RATING
Moderate
Moderate
Low
Low
Low
Moderate
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Project Activity Group: Water Treatment Plant
TYPE OF IMPACT
(a) Air pollution
(b) Water pollution
(c) Soil pollution
DESCRIPTION
1. POLLUTION
Same as in construction phase number (ii)
Phase: Operation and Maintenance
IMPACT RATING
Low
The water treatment plant will lead to increased water consumption and therewith wastewater production.
Due to storage and use of diesels and other lubricants, fuels and lubricants can mistakenly spill into the underground
water resulting in water pollution.
The chances of soil pollution during this phase are possible with leakages of fuels and lubricants.
Moderate
Disposal of waste/sludge into the adjacent forest will result in soil pollution thereby, affecting the use of the land.
Moderate
Moderate
2. HEALTH
(a) Public health risks as a result
Disposal of waste/sludge into the river will result in pollution of the soil and water, thereby, resulting in health
problems.
Moderate
(b) Occupational health safety
During this face of the project, maintenance staff may have to run different shifts including night ones. This may result
in accidents and dangers.
Low
(a) Solid waste generation
3. WASTE GENERATION
Waste will be produced by human maintenance activities such as retune clearance of grasses, solid waste
from empty and /or obsolete chemicals containers. The amounts of waste produced will be much more
limited than during the construction phase.
Low
(b) Sludge
As a result of the extended distribution system, it may be expected that water consumption will increase,
and therewith also the amount of sludge produced by treatment plants. It is not anticipated that the increase
in sludge production will be substantial.
Moderate
(c) Waste water
Waste water will be generated at the various stages of water treatment, such as flocculation, aeration and
sedimentation, which use chemicals such as chlorine, alum and limes.
Moderate
(a) Energy consumption
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
7. ENERGY CONSUMPTION
The use of energy for the distribution of water will be required. The relative increase in energy consumption
as a result of the extensions to the pipeline distribution system is, however, not expected to be substantial.
Low
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Project Activity Group: Water Storage Tank
TYPE OF IMPACT
DESCRIPTION
1. POLLUTION
Air pollution will result from automobiles, light and heavy machines such as generators , and also from dust
being raised during clearing of bushes and felling of trees
Burning of uprooted trees and grasses will also contribute to air pollution
(a) Air pollution
Phase: Pre-Construction
IMPACT RATING
Moderate
(b) Water pollution
Leaching of the fuels from the machines and automobiles into the underground water will result in underground
water pollution.
Low
(c) Soil pollution
Soil pollution may occur as a result of accidental spillage of fuels such as diesel. In addition, there may be fuel,
lubricants and other chemical leakages from improper handling.
Low
(d) Noise pollution
Loud noise and vibrations may result from the use of equipment such as generators, vehicles, drilling machines
(in the case of burrowing) etc.
2. SOCIAL
Constructions sites, in particular, excavations as well as transportation, movement of heavy equipment and
obstruction of roads may cause safety problems to the general public. The use of heavy equipment is expected
to be limited. On the other hand, manually executed works will last longer, resulting in prolonged safety risks.
Moderate
The aesthetics of the surroundings around the construction sites may be affected if not well managed. However,
treatment plant constructions in this project will take place in secluded areas within semi-urban and rural areas
with moderate viewpoint sensitivity. Moreover, the impact is location specific and temporal.
Low
The proposed construction of Treatment Plants may result in the occupation of land used for other purposes
(residential, agriculture, business etc), and which can possibly not be used as such after implementation of the
works (e.g. because the ROW needs to be cleared of structures).
3. HEALTH
Given the tropical climate of Cross River State, stagnant water which may form in pits, holes, excavated ditches
etc, at construction sites may create a habitat for insect disease vectors such as malaria, which poses a health
concern to residents.
Construction works such as: excavations; working with heavy equipment; working in confined spaces; working
on and along the traffic roads; heavy lifting, storage, handling and use of dangerous substances and wastes,
working under noisy conditions will expose the workers to occupational health and safety risks
Low
(a) Safety of the public
(b) Aesthetics
(c) Land take
(a) Public health
(c) Occupational health
and safety
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
Low
Low
Moderate
Moderate
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Project Activity Group: Water Storage Tank
TYPE OF IMPACT
(a) Soil erosion
(a) Impacts on flora
and fauna
Earthguards Limited:
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
DESCRIPTION
4. EROSION
Water pipeline construction for the network extension and rehabilitation of water will entail clearance of the
vegetation from site and the usage of heavy equipment for the work. The compaction of soil and loss of
vegetation cover tends to accelerate erosion activity leading to secondary impacts such as soil instability,
landslides in undulating landform and also surface water pollution due to runoff. Nevertheless most of the
construction activities will take place along existing roads and not undulating landforms thereby reducing erosion
impact to a barest minimum.
5. FLORA AND FAUNA
As the construction will require removal of natural vegetation for the proposed new pipeline extension which
may lead to habitat destruction of natural existing fauna. Although most of the new pipeline extension work will
occur along existing roads or ROWs with less bushes and shrubs removal making vegetation impact to be low
due to low ecological value. Some economical tree will be affected
Sustainable Development Consultants
Phase: Pre-Construction
IMPACT RATING
Low
Moderate
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Project Activity Group: Water Storage Tank
TYPE OF IMPACT
(a) Air pollution
DESCRIPTION
1. POLLUTION
Air pollution may result from EXCAVATION equipments (vessels, pumps) as well as road transportation. It is
expected that such impacts will be limited and transient. Moreover, human receptors in the vicinity of the
reservoir are generally distant.
Phase: Construction
IMPACT RATING
Moderate
(b) Water pollution
Underground water pollution may result from the spillage of fuels from heavy automobiles conveying
equipments to the site and machines used for excavation
Moderate
(c) Soil pollution
There will be soil pollution from the spillage of diesels from automobiles conveying equipments to the site and
generators used on the site
Low
(d) Noise pollution
Noise pollution may result from the dredging works. In the surroundings of the storage tanks, human receptors
in the vicinity of the storage tanks are generally distant. The impacts would therefore be mainly on wildlife in the
area, since the shore lines of the storage tanks are not habitable.
Moderate
TYPE OF IMPACT
(a) Safety of the public
(b) Visual amenities
(c) Land take
Earthguards Limited:
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
DESCRIPTION
2. SOCIAL
Construction sites, in particular excavation, as well as transportation, movement of heavy equipment and
obstructions of roads may cause safety problems to the general public. The use of heavy equipments is expected
to be limited. However, on the other hand, manually executed works will last longer, resulting in prolonged
safety risks. Furthermore, exposed trenches pose fall hazards to humans and animals alike. The risk of such is
particularly important in the case of construction works near frequented public buildings.
Construction sites, if mot well managed, have impacts on the aesthetics of the surroundings. In the case of the
project, all pipelines constructions takes place in the rural and semi-urban areas with moderate viewpoint
sensitivity. Furthermore, the impact is temporary and location-specific.
The proposed Treatment Plants may result in the occupation of land used for other purposes (residential,
agriculture, business etc), and which can possibly not be used as such after implementation of the works (e.g.
because the ROW needs to be cleared of structures).
Sustainable Development Consultants
IMPACT RATING
Moderate
Low
Low
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Project Activity Group: Pipeline
TYPE OF IMPACT
DESCRIPTION
Phase: Pre-Construction
IMPACT
RATING
1. POLLUTION
Air pollution will result from automobiles, light and heavy machines such as generators , and also from dust
being raised during clearing of bushes and felling of trees
Burning of uprooted trees and grasses will also contribute to air pollution
(a) Air pollution
(b) Water pollution
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Leaching of the fuels from the machines and automobiles into the underground water will result in
underground water pollution.
Moderate
Moderate
Low
Low
Accidental spillage of fuel, lubricants and other chemicals may flow into surface waters leading to water
pollution. Also project activities may lead to turbidity in surface watercourses due to run off of sediments
resulting from increased erosion. Although this will be minimal since most of the project sites are not close to
water bodies or water courses
(c) Soil pollution
Soil pollution may occur as a result of accidental spillage of fuels such as diesel. In addition, there may be fuel,
lubricants and other chemical leakages from improper handling.
Moderate
(d) Noise pollution
Loud noise and vibrations may result from the use of equipment such as generators, vehicles, drilling machines
(in the case of burrowing) etc.
Moderate
(a) Safety of the public
(b) Visual amenities
(c) Land take
Earthguards Limited:
2. SOCIAL
Constructions sites, in particular, excavations as well as transportation, movement of heavy equipment and
obstruction of roads may cause safety problems to the general public. The use of heavy equipment is expected
to be limited. On the other hand, manually executed works will last longer, resulting in prolonged safety risks.
Low
The aesthetics of the surroundings around the construction sites may be affected if not well managed.
However, treatment plant constructions in this project will take place in secluded areas within semi-urban and
rural areas with moderate viewpoint sensitivity. Moreover, the impact is location specific and temporal.
Low
The proposed construction of Treatment Plants would result in the occupation of land used for other purposes
(residential, agriculture, business etc), and which can possibly not be used as such after implementation of the
works (e.g. because the ROW needs to be cleared of structures). Details of this would be found in the
Abbreviated resettlement Action Plan (ARAP).
Moderate
Sustainable Development Consultants
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Project Activity Group: Pipeline
TYPE OF IMPACT
(a) Public health
(c) Occupational health
and safety
(a) Soil erosion
(a) Impacts on flora and
fauna
Earthguards Limited:
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
DESCRIPTION
Phase: Pre-Construction
IMPACT RATING
3. HEALTH
Given the tropical climate of Cross River State, stagnant water which may form in pits, holes, excavated
ditches etc, at construction sites may create a habitat for insect disease vectors such as malaria, which
poses a health concern to residents.
Construction works such as: excavations; working with heavy equipment; working in confined spaces;
working on and along the traffic roads; heavy lifting, storage, handling and use of dangerous substances
and wastes, working under noisy conditions will expose the workers to occupational health and safety
risks
4. EROSION
Water pipeline construction for the network extension and rehabilitation of water will entail clearance of
the vegetation from site and the usage of heavy equipment for the work. The compaction of soil and loss
of vegetation cover tends to accelerate erosion activity leading to secondary impacts such as soil
instability, landslides in undulating landform and also surface water pollution due to runoff. Nevertheless
most of the pipeline construction activities will take place along existing roads and not undulating
landforms thereby reducing erosion impact to a minimum.
5. FLORA AND FAUNA
As the construction will require removal of natural vegetation for the proposed new pipeline extension
which may lead to habitat destruction of natural existing fauna. Although most of the new pipeline
extension work will occur along existing roads or ROWs with less bushes and shrubs removal making
vegetation impact to be low due to low ecological value. Some economical tree will be affected
Sustainable Development Consultants
Moderate
Low
Moderate
Moderate
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Project Activity Group: Pipeline
TYPE OF IMPACT
(a) Air pollution
(b) Water pollution
(d) Noise pollution
(a) Safety of the public
(b) Aesthetics
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
DESCRIPTION
Phase: Construction
IMPACT
RATING
1. POLLUTION
Air pollution may result from construction activities, in particular in the form of emissions from vehicles and
construction equipment. It is expected that such impacts will be limited, relatively short-term, transient and
relatively low in magnitude
Water pollution may result from wastewater produced by construction camps and by accidental spillage of fuel,
lubricants and other chemicals used in the process. Furthermore, runoff of sediments resulting from increased soil
erosion and from dust an sand at construction sites may lead to increased turbidity in surface watercourses. In
cases, excavated trenches may need to be kept dry through pumping out of (ground) water. The ground water will
need to be disposed off, but may be contaminated or high in suspended solids.
Noise pollution may result from construction activities, in particular from heavy vehicles and construction
equipments. In particular in the semi-urban and rural environment in which most activities will take place, such
noise pollution may constitute a nuisance to the population. It is, however, expected that works will progress
relatively fast, and generally not last for too long.
2. SOCIAL
Construction sites, in particular excavation, as well as transportation, movement of heavy equipment and
obstructions of roads may cause safety problems to the general public. The use of heavy equipments is expected to
be limited. However, on the other hand, manually executed works will last longer, resulting in prolonged safety
risks. Furthermore, exposed trenches pose fall hazards to humans and animals alike. The risk of such is particularly
important in the case of construction works near frequented public buildings.
Construction sites, if not well managed, have impact on the aesthetics of the surroundings. In the case of the
project, all pipelines construction takes place in rural and semi-urban areas with moderate viewpoint sensitivity.
Furthermore, the impact is temporary and location-specific
Moderate
Moderate
Low
© Land take
Although the majority of proposed pipelines will be along existing roads and in existing ROW’s, the proposed
pipelines extension may result in the occupation of land used for other purposes (residential, agriculture, businesses,
etc,) and which can possibly not be used as such after implementation of the works (e.g. because the ROW needs to
be clear of structures). Details of this would be seen in the Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan (ARAP)
Moderate
(d) Social conflict
Social conflict may result due to diverse interest and fera of change. It may also arise due to disruption of social and
economic lives during civil works.
Moderate
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Project Activity Group: Pipeline
TYPE OF
IMPACT
(a) Public health
(c) Occupational
health and safety
(a) Soil erosion and
Contamination
Disturbance and
interruption of
commercial and
social activities
(a) Impacts on
flora and fauna
Earthguards Limited:
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
DESCRIPTION
3. HEALTH
Public health problems may occur in the case of badly managed construction camps and work sites. In the
case of the proposed works, it is not expected that large
Construction works such as: excavations; working with heavy equipment; working in confined spaces; working
on and along the traffic roads; heavy lifting, storage, handling and use of dangerous substances and wastes,
working under noisy conditions will expose the workers to occupational health and safety risks
4. EROSION
The construction of the water distribution network (pipelines) requires the clearance of sites from vegetation,
as well as the execution of excavation works using heavy equipments. Inappropriate construction practices and
soil protection measures may induce or accelerate erosion, leading to soil instability and landslides in hilly
areas, with possible water pollution due run-off to surface waters. Fortunately, the majority of construction
which is related to pipe laying takes place along existing roads, and not on hill slopes. Nevertheless, it may be
anticipated that the clearing of vegetation in the ROW will lead to temporary increase in soil erosion, until revegetation has occurred.
Furthermore, contamination may occur as a result of accidental or structural spillage of fuels, lubricants
chemicals, sanitary waste water, etc, as well as from leakages from inadequate protected solids waste storage
facilities and sites. Good construction practices would however, largely avoid any such risks.
Construction activities for the water distribution network may only be temporary, but construction activities
may be spread over a long period of time. Without adequate planning and communication of activities,
construction activities may cause traffic disruptions and congestion, resulting in temporary disturbance and
interruption of commercial and social activities. This is particularly the case in the high density semi-urban
environments.
Construction activities may furthermore cause damage to other infrastructure (roads, sewerage pipes, drains,
buildings etc.), and therewith lead to short-term disruption of certain public services.
5. FLORA AND FAUNA
Certain stretches of the proposed pipeline extensions may require the removal of natural vegetation, leading to
potential habitat loss of its associated fauna. However, the majority of proposed construction works will be
along roads and in existing ROWs. Although clearances of bushes and shrubs will therefore not be fully
unavoidable, the actual impacts’ on vegetation are expected to be low.
Sustainable Development Consultants
Phase: Construction
IMPACT RATING
Moderate
Low
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Project Activity Group: Pipeline
TYPE OF IMPACT
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
DESCRIPTION
Phase: Operation and Maintenance
IMPACT
RATING
1. Air Pollution
Air pollution
Same as construction phase.
Noise Pollution
Same as in the construction phase
Water pollution
Water pollution may result from the accidental spillage of fuel, lubricants and other chemicals used in the process.
Furthermore, runoff of sediment resulting from increased soil erosion and from dust and sand at construction sites
may lead to increased turbidity in surface watercourses. In cases, excavated trenches may need to be kept dry
through pumping out of ground water. The pumped water will need to be disposed off, but may be contaminated
or high in suspended solids.
Another issue related to water pollution is related to the fact that the extended distribution system will lead to
increased water consumption and therewith wastewater production. This may, in turn, increase water pollution,
since wastewater treatment facilities are in most cases absent. The impact is largely restricted to pipeline extensions.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Project Activity Group: Pipeline
TYPE OF IMPACT
Nuisance and public health
risks as a result of incidental
and structural (institutional)
operational failures of the
distribution network
Loss of wild lands, forests
and wildlife habitat.
Soil erosion and
contamination
Earthguards Limited:
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
DESCRIPTION
Phase: Operation and Maintenance
IMPACT
RATING
2. SOCIAL
Piped water distribution systems are particularly sensitive to operational failures. Since drinking water is treated
before entering the network and not at the actual distribution point in the houses, anything happening to the water
in between will directly pose public health risks. Accidental ruptures of pipelines and structural degradation of
pipelines as a result of ageing and poor maintenance, accompanied by low pressure in the pipes will allow the
intrusion of potentially polluted groundwater into the drinking water distribution system. Another issue may be the
realization of branched connections (e.g. for new areas or to households),if not done in a proper manner. Parts of
such connections may be illegal. Particularly sensitive may be the impact in the case of or other areas of high level
pollution such as landfills and industrial zones.
Furthermore, accidents and leaks due to ruptures of pipelines may cause flooding with consequential effects, in
particular in terms of disturbance of socio-economic activities. Flooding may also have its impact on insects and
waterborne disease vectors, as well as public health risk due to overflowing of drainage systems and open sewers
and is particularly hazardous in the vicinity of concentrated pollution sources such as landfills and industrial zones
A third source of nuisance and public health risk is related to the fact that it may be expected that water
consumption will increase as a result of the extended distribution system. Therewith, the production of wastewater
will also increase. Since sanitary facilities in most areas are very basic, and centralized collection and treatment
facilities do not exist, this may result in increased public health risks. In relative terms the increase in water
production is not expected to be substantial, but local effects may be observed.
The area of project activities is largely in the rural and semi-urban areas, and has consequently been greatly affected
by human habitation. None of the project areas is of exceptional ecological value.
Inspection and maintenance works for the water distribution network (pipelines) requires the clearance of sites
from vegetation, as well and the excavation works, possibly using heavy equipments. Inappropriate construction
practices and soil protection measures may induce or accelerate erosion, leading to soil instability and landslides in
hilly areas, with possible water pollution due to run-off to surface waters. Fortunately, the majority of the proposed
pipelines is along existing roads. Nevertheless, it may be anticipated that clearing of vegetation on the ROW will
lead to temporary increase in soil erosion, until revegetation has occurred.
Sustainable Development Consultants
Moderate
-
Moderate
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Project Activity Group: Pipeline
TYPE OF
IMPACT
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
DESCRIPTION
Phase: Operation and Maintenance
IMPACT RATING
3. HEALTH
(a) Public
health
problems from
construction
camps and
sites, and
imported
labour
Same as in construction phase but lower scale
(c)
Occupational
health and
safety
Disturbance
and
interruption of
commercial
and social
activities
Construction works such as excavations; working with heavy equipment; working in confined spaces; working on
and along the traffic roads; heavy lifting, storage, handling and use of dangerous substances and wastes, working
under noisy conditions will expose the workers to occupational health and safety risks
Low
Maintenance activities for the water distribution network may only be temporary, but without adequate planning of
activities, construction activities may cause traffic disruptions and congestion, resulting in disturbance and
interruption of commercial and social activities. The impact will be highest in areas of higher population density, and
less important in low density areas
Moderate
(a) Soil erosion
and
Contamination
Inspection and maintenance works for the water distribution (pipelines) requires the clearance of sites from
vegetation, as well as the execution of excavation works, possibly using heavy equipment. Inappropriate construction
practices and soil protection measures may induce or accelerate erosion, leading to soil instability and landslides in
hilly areas, with possible water pollution due to run-off to surface waters. Fortunately, the majority of the proposed
pipelines is along existing roads. Nevertheless, it may be anticipated that clearing of vegetation on the ROW will lead
to temporary increase in soil erosion, until re-vegetation has occurred.
5. FLORA AND FAUNA
Inspection and maintenance works may require the removal of the vegetation, leading to potential habitat loss of its
associated fauna. However, the majority of proposed pipelines will be along roads and in existing ROW’s. Although
clearance of bushes and shrubs will therefore not be fully unavoidable, the actual impact on the vegetation is
expected to be low.
(a) Impacts on
flora and fauna
Earthguards Limited:
Moderate
Maintenance activities may furthermore cause damage to other infrastructure (roads, sewerage pipes, drains,
buildings, etc), and therewith lead to short-term disruption of certain public services.
4. EROSION
Sustainable Development Consultants
Moderate
Moderate
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
6
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
MITIGATION PLAN
6.1
Introduction
Environmental mitigation consists of measures that can reduce the negative environmental impacts
associated with implementation (construction, expansion) of the project. Mitigation measures have been
identified that would reduce both existing and potential impacts associated with existing facilities and
upgrading/new construction.
For each of the identified impacts specific mitigation measures may be defined. The general rule in
designing such measures is:

Avoidance of major impacts: major impacts are generally considered unacceptable, certainly ones that
would endure into the long-term or extend over a large area; and

Reduction of major and moderate impacts to as low as reasonably practicable by planning, designing
and controlling mitigation measures. This Implies that mitigation measures will be applied up until
the limitations of cost-effectiveness and practical application are reached. The limitations are
established by best international practice.
 Implementation of good contractor practices for impacts rated as minor, in order to ensure that
impacts are management within good reason.
Table 6.1 Mitigation Hierarchy for Planned Project Activities
Avoid at Source; Reduce at Source
Avoiding or reducing at source is essentially ‘designing’ the project so that a feature causing impact is
designed out (e.g. pipeline re-route) or altered (e.g. reduced working width). Often called minimization.
Abate on Site
This involves adding something to the basic design to abate the impact- pollution controls fall within this
category. Often called end-of-pipe.
Abate at Receptor
If an impact cannot be abated on-site then measures can be implemented off-site. An example of this
would be to instruct authorities in affected schools to increase the level of supervision of their pupils
during the period of civil works.
Repair or Remedy
Some impacts involve unavoidable damage to a resource, e.g. agricultural land during pipeline construction.
Repair essentially involves restoration and reinstatement type measures.
Mitigation measures related to construction of water treatment plants and extension of the distribution
network.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Table 6.2: Mitigation Measures of Impacts during Pre-Construction, Construction and Operation and Maintenance Phase
PRE-CONSTRUCTION, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PHASE.
DESCRIPTION OF MITIGATION MEASURE
POTENTIAL
IMPACT
(a) Air pollution





















(b) Water pollution
(c) Soil pollution
(d) Noise pollution
-
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
1. POLLUTION
Periodic maintenance of vehicles and equipment according to repair revision programme.
Use of good quality lubricants and fuel.
Sprinkling of water during dry periods to prevent dust.
Burning of wastes at site should be avoided to reduce air pollution.
Waste should be stored temporarily in storage containers and disposed off at sites approved by the authority.
Sludge can be re-used/recycled into the water treatment system.
Solid wastes, fuels or oils should not be disposed off into water flows.
Fuel storage tanks should be leak-proof and checked daily. The tanks should be installed in a bounded area and should be replaced
in cases of leakage.
Parking areas for motor vehicles should be on paved concrete surfaces.
Fuelling, maintenance and cleaning of motor vehicles should be done in workshop with necessary leakage preventive methods.
Where civil works take place adjacent to a watercourse, preventive methods must be put in place to avoid silt from falling into the
Watercourse.
The Contractor should ensure implementation of measures to protect soils from both structural and accidental contamination.
Hazardous and cleaning waste should be stored temporarily in storage facilities and at sites approved by the authority.
Fuel storage tanks should be leak-proof and checked daily. The tanks should be installed in a bounded area and should be replaced
in cases of leakage.
Procedures for storage, handling of hazardous wastes and raw materials (e.g. batteries, chemicals, fuels) should be prepared as part
of the Contractors Waste Management Plan. Implementation of such procedures should be adequately enforced and monitored.
Oils should be stored in their original drums and kept on top of an impermeable surface preferably in the contractors store room.
Minimization of the noise sources in accordance with EPAD standards (with the allowable noise emission limits of less than
90dBA).
Adequate attention should be given to the control of noise and vibration on site.
Adequate maintenance of equipment and vehicles according to periodical repair/revision programme.
Noise preventive measures, such as mufflers, should be installed on equipment and motor vehicles.
106
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Scheme
PRE-CONSTRUCTION, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PHASE.
DESCRIPTION OF MITIGATION MEASURE
POTENTIAL
IMPACT
(a) Safety of the
public
(b)Visual amenities
(c) Disturbance and
interruption of social
activities










(a) Public health

(b) Health problems







(c)
Occupational
health safety
(a) Soil erosion



Earthguards Limited:
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
2. SOCIAL
Adequate protection and signaling of work sites in particular during the night, with clear marking of the safety border on the works perimeter.
Informing the local communities of the construction programme through for example, local FM radio stations.
Prohibition of access to work sites by any person having no work permit in particular where it concerns areas marked as ‘restricted’. The latter should
include at least places occupied by operation mechanical and electrical equipment
Firefighting equipment should be installed at fuel storage tanks along with collecting trays and absorbent materials.
Civil work should be avoided at night except where necessary.
Restriction (as much as possible) of the size of construction sites and camps.
Conversion of vegetation around work sites in order to serve as visual shields.
Adequate organization and maintenance of work site through good housekeeping.
Restoration of work sites back to pre construction state upon completion of works.
Establishment of traffic plans at locations of blockage roads, and implementation of appropriate traffic control at such locations.
3. HEALTH
Stagnant water on construction sites should be avoided through proper maintenance of the site and through the removal of water from ditches
especially after rainfall or groundwater infiltration to avoid the breeding of mosquitoes.
Imported workers if used should have proper housing and sanitary conditions.
The number of imported workers should be reduced to the minimum while the use of local workers should be encouraged.
HIV and AIDS awareness and lecture should be given to the workers so as to reduce the spread of the disease among the locals.
Labourers should adhere to basic rules.
Workers should be provided with safety gadgets
Contractor should ensure that worker wear their safety gadget and also observe all safety percussion.
Safety signs such as ‘MEN AT WORK’ should be mounted where and when workers are working so as to alert motorist.
4. EROSION
When civil works involves working on slopes and human stream beddings, appropriate erosion protection measures should be taken.
Excavation works should not be undertaken under aggressive weather conditions such as under heavy rain fall which will accelerate erosion of the
excavated earth.
Top soils when removed, should be stored until after the trenches have been filled only then should it be re- instated.
Sustainable Development Consultants
107
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
.
POTENTIAL IMPACT
(a) Impacts on flora and fauna





PRE-CONSTRUCTION, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATIONAND MAINTENANCE PHASES.
DESCRIPTION OF MITIGATION MEASURE
5. FLORA AND FAUNA
The Contractor should minimize the work site to the minimum possible size in an attempt to minimize the destruction on flora and fauna found
and thus prevent ecological damages.
The appropriate authority’s consent should be sought before any tree is fell. Also fees and fines should be paid where necessary to the
appropriate institution.
Ecological restoration through environmental engineering should be undertaken after any human intervention. This may include restoration of
top soils and introduction of new species to restore the local ecology
6. WASTE MANAGEMENT
Collection and temporary storage of cleaning and sanitary wastes, as well as garbage, in containers.
The Contractor should prepare a Solid Waste Management Plan, which should include:



(a) Solid waste generation




(b) Sludge/ Waste water
generation

(c) Energy Consumption

Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
A detailed list of the types and quantities of waste to be produced, including their hazard classes.
An assessment of any opportunities for reducing solid waste generation, in particular, hazardous and undesirable (persistent and non-reusable) types of wastes.
The most appropriate waste management plan should be determined for each type of solid waste. This should include details on
(temporary) storage, transport and a final destination for the waste. With regards to the latter, the most appropriate way would be reuse,
followed by recycling/ recovery and finally disposal or incineration.
Records of types, quantities, origins, (temporary) storage, transport and elimination/ reuse of solid waste must be kept by the Contractor, and
He/ She should make these available to the works supervisor upon his request, as proof of proper waste management practices.
Waste disposals should occur at only site approved by the authorities.
Recycling companies should be used in transferring and, recycling and disposing of waste except for sludge that need to be recycled into the
water treatment systems.
Soils and underground waters should be taken into consideration when providing and constructing material storages.
Sludge should be treated, and disposed off appropriately according to EPAD standards or re-used/recycled where feasible. Treated sludge/waste
can also be economically useful for plant growth.
7. ENERGY CONSUMPTION
Since the increase in energy consumption will not be substantial it is therefore advised that as much as possible the use of electrical power from
PHCN be encouraged since it is more sustainable (cheaper and renewable) in place of diesel operated generators.
108
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
.
7
MONITORING PLAN
7.1
Monitoring Plan
The objective of the monitoring plan is to establish appropriate criteria to verify the
predicted impact of the project, and to ensure that any unforeseen impacts are
detected and the mitigation adjusted where needed at an early stage. The plan will
ensure that mitigating measures are implemented during works: Specific objectives of
the monitoring plan are to:



check the effectiveness of recommended mitigation measures;
demonstrate that sub-project activities are carried out in accordance with the
prescribed mitigation measures and existing regulatory procedures; and
Provide early warning signals whenever an impact indicator approaches a
critical level.
The oversight for the environmental and social management process of the subprojects will be assured by the supervisory consultants in collaboration with the CRSNUWSRP2 Project Implementation Unit via the Environmental Officer will be
conducted during all phases of the project: design, construction, execution, operation
and maintenance.
7.2
Monitoring Procedure:
A fundamental approach in monitoring and evaluation segment of this project will
avoid the linear conceptual model, in which monitoring and evaluation come in the
end of the implementation processes. However, it is recommended that monitoring
will be a continuous process throughout the entire phases of the project.
Based on measurable indicators, the progress of the project will be assessed. The
Environmental Officer will prepare a long term monitoring strategy that will
encompass clear and definitive parameters to be monitored for each sub-project. The
monitoring plan will take into consideration the scope of development, the
environmental and social sensitivity and the financial and technical means available
for monitoring. The plan will identify and describe the indicators to be used, the
frequency of monitoring and the standard (baseline) against which the indicators will
be measured for compliance with the EMP.
A number of indicators would be used in order to determine the status of the
affected environment as follows:
 Environmental Indicators:
o Loss of vegetation;
o Land degradation;
o Compliance with Legislations.
 Social indicators:
o Population,
o Income
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
109
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
.
8
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
8.1
Definition and Introduction
This involves environmental and social control and mitigation measures, monitoring
programs, and responsibilities which must be developed based upon an assessment
of environmental and social impacts and risks for the proposed project. This EMP is
intended to ensure efficient environmental management of these activities. The EMP
includes the following sections:
 the potential environmental and social impacts,
 the proposed mitigation measures,
 arrangement for EMP implementation,
 responsibilities for EMP and mitigation measures implementation;
 capacity building needs; and
 EMP implementation budget.
Summary of Impacts: The predicted adverse environmental and social impacts for
which mitigation is required are identified and briefly summarised in tables 5.1 to
5.11.
Mitigation Measures: Feasible and cost effective measures to reduce potentially
significant adverse environmental and social impacts to acceptable levels are defined.
Details of the proposed mitigation measures can be found in Chapter 6.
Monitoring Measures: Activities to monitor the effectiveness of the defined mitigation
measures are defined. These monitoring activities will allow for any additional
remedial measures to be undertaken if mitigation measures are inadequate or the
impacts have been underestimated within the EIA report, in particular where the
results are not in compliance with the obtained permits, national standards and
World Bank Group requirements and guidelines. Details of the proposed monitoring
measures can be found in Chapter 7.
Institutional Measures: Responsibilities for mitigation and monitoring will be clearly
defined as well as arrangements for co-ordination between the various factors
responsible for mitigation. Furthermore, training and capacity building requirement
are presented.
Implementation Schedule: The timing, frequency, and duration of mitigation measures
are specified in an implementation schedule.
Cost Estimates and Sources of Funds: For initial investment and recurring expenses for
implementing of measures contained in the EMP, cost estimates are presented, in
order to allow for integration into the total project costs.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
110
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
.
Design Measures: The quantities, specifications and estimated costs of design measures
to avoid or mitigate negative impacts will be assessed by the civil design contractor
and incorporated into the bidding documents.
8.2
Implementation Arrangement
The resources required for implementing the EMP are basically personnel and
finance. The key stakeholders in the EMP implementation are the project engineers,
contractor/consultants, EPAD and the World Bank.
The project team shall ensure that implementation process complies with all relevant
policies and procedures of both the World Bank and Nigeria.
The project will provide staff to achieve the following objectives:



propose management rules and specific measures that are compatible with
sustainable development while implementing the project
promote awareness by its personnel and the general public regarding
environmental protection,
propose concrete means of applying the EMP.
The environmental/social specialist attached to the project, project engineers;
monitoring and evaluation officer/environmental desk officer will be responsible for
the implementation of the EMP in close collaboration with EPAD. The
management plan will be executed by a group of professionals or consulting firm to
be hired by the project. These professionals will be qualified in the following
disciplines:






Environmental Assessment & Monitoring
Soil & Water Conservation
Air and Noise Analysis
Civil Engineering
Public Health
Sociology and Socio-Economics
The monitoring and evaluation (M& E) officer/project engineer at the PIU will be
responsible for the implementation of the environmental monitoring and the EMP.
He is also to ensure that the contractors adhere to the General Environmental
Management Conditions for Construction contracts. His responsibilities shall
include:





Coordination, liaison with and monitoring of the contractors;
Compilation and preparation of periodic environmental reports for submission
to the World Bank;
Review of ESIA reports from consultants in collaboration with EPAD and FME
Data Management; and
Sub-project Inspections
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
111
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
.
8.2.1. World Bank
The World Bank performs the following role;
 Ensure that its Safeguard Policies are complied with.
 Responsible for the final review and clearance of the EIAs,
 Ensures that environmental safeguards are taken care of during World Bank
supervision mission.
8.2.2. Cross River State Water Board Limited (CRSWBL)




Ensure that there are sufficient resources (time, money and people) to manage
the implementation of the EMP,
Ensure bid documents include actions to address adverse impacts resulting from
construction work,
Ensure that the EMP reflects any changes during the construction process that
may have a significant environmental or social impact,
Organise seminars to disseminate EMP document to relevant stakeholders,
communities, etc.
8.2.3. Environmental Officer



Ensure that there are sufficient resources (time, money and people) to supervise the
environmental issues of the works.
Ensure that any changes during construction process that may have significant
environmental or social impact are communicated to the EPAD in time and advice on
actions to be taken and costs involved.
Ensure that the EPAD is sufficiently informed on monitoring results.
8.2.4. Contractor





Ensure that there are sufficient resources (time, money and people) to manage the
environmental issues of the works.
Be responsible for ensuring that all site staff, including sub-contractors and subcontracted activities will comply with the projects EMP.
Ensure that any changes during the construction process that may have a significant
environmental and social impact are communicated to the Supervising Engineer in time
and manage them accordingly.
Ensure that the Environmental Supervising Engineer is sufficiently informed on
contractor’s monitoring results.
Organising weekly work meetings.
Appendix 6 gives detailed General Environmental Management conditions for contractors
during civil works.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
112
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
.
8.3
Recommended Capacity Building and Training
8.3.1
Training Needs
Based on the assessment of the institutional capacities of the different agencies involved in
the implementation of the EMP, it is recommended that the Cross River State Water Board
Limited contract technical and professional assistance to provide recommended training and
operational support to the PIU and other agencies involved in the EMP implementation.
The recommended courses and sub-courses are given in table 8.1.
Table 8.1: Training Course Outline
DAY 1
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
COURSE 1: Introduction
COURSE 2: Impact Prediction, Evaluation and Mitigation
COURSE 3: Environmental Management Plan
COURSE 4: Environmental Audit
TRAGET GROUPS
Environmental officer
(EPAD)
PIU Staff
Head of Engineering
dept-CRSWBL
Environmental officer
COST (NAIRA)
508,800
COURSE 5: Constraints Encountered on ESIA Process
DAY 2
INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT
COURSE 1: Involuntary Resettlement Techniques
COURSE 2: Conflict Redress Management
DAY 3
PIU Staff
Conflict Redress
Committee members
450,000
HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT (HSE)
COURSE 1: Emergency Response and Preparedness
COURSE 2: Occupational Health and Safety Monitoring
COURSE 3: Basic Safety Equipment (BSE) and Personal
Protection Equipment(PPE)
Environmental officer
(EPAD)
PIU Staff
Head of Engineering
dept-CRSWBL
Environmental officer
Safety Officer
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
COURSE 1: Collection, Transportation and Disposal
COURSE 2: Sludge Management Plan
COURSE 3: Monitoring and Evaluation
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
113
Environmental officer
(EPAD)
PIU Staff
Head of Engineering
dept-CRSWBL
Environmental officer
Heads of waste handler,
transporter and disposal
site operators
928,000
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
.
8.3.2
Training of Contractors Personnel:
The Contractor should provide sufficient training to his/her own personnel to ensure that they are fully aware of
the relevant aspects of the EMP and are able to fulfil their roles and functions (contractor’s responsibility).
Specific training should be provided to those employees that have specific tasks associated with the
implementation of the EMP.
General topics should be:
 HSE in general (working procedures)
 Emergency procedures
 Social and cultural aspects (awareness rising on social issues).
This kind of training should be a requirement of contract for the Contractor of the works.
8.4
Environmental Management Plan Budget
The total cost for the EMP in Itigidi Obubra and Okpoma water schemes is estimated at Eleven Million Nine
Hundred and Fifty Nine Thousand, Eight Hundred and Sixty naira only. The break down is given in Table 8.2.
Table 8.2: Budget and Responsibilities
ITEM
Mitigation
Management
Monitoring
Training/
Capacity Building
Resettlement Cost
Sub- Total
Contingency
Total per LGA
Total for three
(3) LGAs
RESPONSIBILITY
CRSWBL- /EPAD
CRSWBL-CRSWBL-- / EPAD
CRSWBL/Consultant
COST BREAKDOWN
COST ESTIMATE
IN
NIGERIAN NAIRA
(N)
COST ESTIMATE
IN
US DOLLARS
(US$)
5% of Mitigation Cost
25% of Mitigation Cost
1,572,000
78,600
393,000
1,886,800
10,480
524
2620
12,579
10% of Sub- Total
2,343,000
6,273,400
1,707,340.
7,980,740
23,942,220
15,620
41,823
11,382
53,205
159,615
3 * Total per Town
Table 8.3 on the next page shows the EMP table portraying impacts, mitigation measures, implementation
schedule and responsibilities for mitigation and monitoring.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
114
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
.
Table 8.3: EMP Table Portraying Impact, Mitigation Measures, Implementation Schedule and Responsibilities for Mitigation and Monitoring
POTENTIAL IMPACT
MONITORING
INDICATORS
MONITORING
PARAMETERS
MONITORING
FREQUENCY
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
MITIGATION MEASURES
MITIGATION
COST ESTIMATE
NAIRA (US$)
RESPONSIBILITY
IMPLEMENTATION
1. POLLUTION
(a) Air pollution
Air pollution will result from
automobiles, light and heavy
machineries such as generators. and
bulldozers
Burning of wastes such as wood,
paper etc. will also contribute to
pollution. These pollution rates will
also be minimal as construction
would not be on a large scale and will
be short term.
As laying of the extension pipes will
require the removal of the top soil i.e.
digging in other to lay the pipes, there
will be a substantial release of fine
sand particles especially during the dry
season, although this will be a shorttermed impact since the removed earth
will be replaced.
CO2 and CO
NOx, SOx, THC and
CO
Particulate Matter
(maximum limit 250
μg/m3)
(b) Water pollution
Water pollution will result from
disposal of waste water/sludge into the
river or by waste water spill off.
Accidental spillage of fuel. Lubricants
and other chemicals may flow into
surface waters leading to water
pollution. Also project activities may
lead
to
turbidity
in
surface
watercourses due to run off of
sediments resulting from increased
erosion. Although this will be minimal
since most of the project sites are not
close to water bodies or water courses
Earthguards Limited:
Monitor
CO2
and
CO(maximum
limit
11μg/m3 or 10ppm) in
the surrounding project
area
Monitor NOx (maximum
limit 0.04-0.06ppm), SOx
(maximum limit 0.1
ppm), THC and CO in
the surrounding air
before the construction
and thereafter weekly
during the construction
phase.
Monitor Particulate
Matter,
Weekly
Weekly
Daily (Morning and
Evening)
During
activities
construction
Before and during
construction activities
During
activities
construction
Water Quality
Physical property of
the watercourse
Daily
During operation/water
treatment
Water Quality
Daily
During construction
activities
BOD, COD, , TDS, TSS,
salinity, pH,
E coli, Salmonella
Heavy metal
composition and
Turbidity of water
properties
Sustainable Development Consultants
Arsenic, Lead and
Mercury
Weekly
During construction,
operation and
maintenance activities
115
(i) Periodic maintenance of vehicles
and equipment according to repair
revision programme. Also good quality
lubricants and fuels must be used.
(ii) Provision of nose masks to the
workers on site that are exposed to
these harmful gases.
(ii) Burning of wastes at sites should be
avoided to reduce air pollution. All
waste should be directed to a EPAD’s
approved dumpsite.
EPAD
Contractor/
Supervising
Consultant
M & E officer
N 60,000
($375))
N 267,000
($1,668.75)
(i) Dispose sludge to the EPAD
designated places or re-use/recycle
where feasible
Nil
(iii) Where civil works take place
adjacent to a watercourse, preventive
methods must be put in place to avoid
silt from falling into the watercourse.
This should be done by providing an
alternate drainage route.
Project Engineers of
CRSWBL
N 400,000
($2,500)
(iii) Sprinkling of water during dry
periods to prevent dust.
(ii) Fuel storage tanks should be leak
proof and checked daily. The tanks
should be installed in a bounded area
and should be replaced in cases of
leakage.
SUPERVISION
Nil
Project Engineers of
CRSWBL
M & E officer
Nil
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
.
POTENTIAL IMPACT
MONITORING
INDICATORS
The extended pipeline distribution
system will lead to increased water
consumption and therewith
wastewater production. This may,
in turn, increase water pollution,
since waste water treatment
facilities are absent
(c) Soil pollution
Soil pollution may occur as a result
of accidental spillage of fuels such
as diesel. In addition, there may be
fuel, lubricants and other
hazardous chemical leakages from
improper storage facilities
Water Quality
MONITORING
PARAMETERS
Monitor BOD, chemical
property such as Nitrate,
pH, Heavy metals and
turbidity of the nearby
water bodies before the
construction and
thereafter monthly during
the construction activities
MONITORING
FREQUENCY
Monthly
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
During operation and
maintenance activities
Chemical and Heavy
metal composition in
soil
During
activities
construction
Heavy metal
composition in soil
During
activities
construction
During
activities
construction
Heavy metal
composition in soil
Monitor biological,
chemical and property
such as Nitrate, pH,
Heavy metals and before
the construction and
thereafter monthly during
the construction activities
Daily
Heavy metal
composition in soil
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
MITIGATION MEASURES
(iv) Water from pressure testing should be
tested prior to discharge to make sure it
meets EPAD standards. If this standard is
not met, advice should be sought from
EPAD in regards to treatment and
discharge.
(i) Hazardous and cleaning waste should
be stored temporarily in storage facilities
and at sites approved by the authority.
(ii) Fuel storage tanks should be leak
proof and checked daily. The tanks should
be installed in a bounded area and should
be replaced in cases of leakage.
(iii) Procedures for storage, handling of
hazardous wastes and raw materials (e.g.
batteries, chemicals, fuels) should be
prepared as part of the Contractors Waste
Management Plan. Implementation of
such procedures should be adequately
enforced and monitored.
(iv) Oils should be stored in their original
drums and kept on top of an impermeable
surface preferably in the contractors store
room.
116
MITIGATION
COST ESTIMATE
NAIRA (US$)
N 130,000
RESPONSIBILITY
IMPLEMENTATION
Contractor/
supervising
consultant
($812.5)
SUPERVISION
Project Engineers of
CRSWBL/
EPAD
M & E officer/
Environmental
Officer
N 10,000
($62.5)
Nil
Nil
Nil
Project Engineers of
CRWSBL
Contractor/
supervising
consultant
M & E officer/
Environmental
Officer
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
.
POTENTIAL IMPACT
(d) Noise pollution
Noise pollution may result from
construction activities, in particular
from heavy vehicles and
construction equipments. In
particular in the semi-urban and
rural environment in which most
activities will take place, such noise
pollution may constitute a nuisance
to the population. It is, however,
expected that works will progress
relatively fast, and generally not last
for too long.
(2) SOCIAL
(a) Safety of the public
Constructions sites, in particular
excavations,
as
well
as
transportation, movement of heavy
equipment and obstructions of
roads may cause safety problems to
the general public. The use of
heavy equipment is expected to be
limited. However, on the other
hand, manually executed works will
last longer, resulting in prolonged
safety risks.
Furthermore, exposed trenches
pose fall hazards to humans and
animals alike especially at night.
The risk of such is particularly
important in the case of
construction works near frequented
public buildings such as the
schools.
Earthguards Limited:
MONITORING
INDICATORS
MONITORING
PARAMETERS
MONITORING
FREQUENCY
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
MITIGATION MEASURES
Noise level:

<55 dBA by
day

<45dBA
by
night
But not higher than
baseline result
Noise level in the
surrounding project
site
Should be less than
90dBA. In accordance
with EPAD standard
Should be less than
90dBA.In accordance
with EPAD standard
Daily
Noise level in the
surrounding project
site
Should be less than
90dBA. In accordance
with EPAD standard
Daily
During
activities
construction
(iii) Adequate maintenance of equipment and
vehicles
according
to
periodical
repair/revision programme.
Noise level in the
surrounding project
site
Should be less than
90dBA. In accordance
with EPAD standard
Daily
During
activities
construction
(iv) Noise reduction measures, such as
mufflers, should be installed on equipment
and motor vehicles.
Daily
Before
and
during
construction, activities
(i) Informing the local communities of the
construction programme through, local FM
radio stations, and public consultation.
Complaints from the
residents affected
people
Daily
Sustainable Development Consultants
(i) Minimization the noise sources in
accordance with EPAD standards (with the
allowable noise emission limits of less than
90dBA).
During
activities
(ii) Adequate attention should be given to the
control of noise and vibration on site.
During
activities
construction
construction,
Daily
Daily
Complaints from the
project site residents.
During Preconstruction/Constructio
n activities
Daily
During
activities
construction,
During construction,
operation and
maintenance activities
117
MITIGATION
COST ESTIMATE
NAIRA (US$)
IMPLEMENTATION
SUPERVISION
Nil
Nil
Contractor/
supervising
consultant
Project Engineers of
CRSWBL
M & E officer/
Environmental
Officer
N 30,000
($187.5)
N 80,000
($500)
(ii) Prohibition of access to work sites by any
person having no work permit in particular
were it concerns areas marked as ‘restricted’.
The latter should include at least places
occupied by operation mechanical and
electrical equipment and chemicals
(iii) Firefighting equipment such as fire
extinguishers should be installed at fuel
storage tanks along with collecting trays and
absorbent materials.
(iv) Adequate protection and signaling of
work sites in particular during the night, with
clear marking of the safety border on the
works perimeter. Civil works should be
avoided at night except where necessary
RESPONSIBILITY
Contractor/
supervising
consultant
N 25,000
($156.25)
N 30,000
($187.5)
Project Engineers of
CRSWBL
M & E officer/
Environmental
Officer
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
.
POTENTIAL IMPACT
MONITORING
INDICATORS
MONITORING
PARAMETERS
MONITORING
FREQUENCY
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
MITIGATION MEASURES
MITIGATION
COST ESTIMATE
NAIRA (US$)
RESPONSIBILITY
IMPLEMEN
TATION
Complaints from the
project site residents.
(b) Visual Amenities
The aesthetics of the
surroundings around the
construction sites may be
affected if not well management.
In the case of the project, all
pipeline constructions will take
place in urban and semi- urban
areas with moderate viewpoint
sensitivity. Moreover, the impact
is location specific and temporal
Daily
During construction,
operation and
maintenance activities
(i) Restriction (as much as possible) of the
size of civil work site.
Daily
During construction,
operation and
maintenance activities
(ii) Daily cleaning of work sites must be
performed at the end of each working day
Daily
After construction, and
during operation and
maintenance activities
(iii) Restoration of work sites back to pre
construction state upon completion of
works.
SUPERVISION
Contractor/
supervising
consultant
Project Engineers of
CRSWBL
EPAD
M & E officer/
Environmental Officer
(iv) Each working site should be provided
with a bucket or dustbin were such waste
must be dropped and later taken to a dump
site approved by EPAD
Complaints from the
project site residents.
Complaints from the
project site residents.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
See 2(a)(i)
During construction,
operation and
maintenance activities
Daily
During construction,
operation and
maintenance activities
118
(ii)Public consultations should be held with
the Project Affected Persons (PAP’s).
(iii) The work site should be reduced as
much as possible to ONLY the area
designed to be worked on each day. In
addition, obstruction of facilities such as
roads should be minimized.
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
.
POTENTIAL IMPACT
MONITORING
INDICATORS
MONITORING
PARAMETERS
MONITORING
FREQUENCY
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
MITIGATION MEASURES
MITIGATION
COST ESTIMATE
NAIRA (US$)
RESPONSIBILITY
IMPLEMENTATION
Maintenance activities may
cause
damage
to
other
infrastructure (roads, sewerage,
drains, etc), and therewith lead
to (short- term) disruption of
certain
public
services.
Although these may be
temporal, but without adequate
planning
of
activities,
construction activities may
cause traffic disruptions and
congestion,
resulting
in
disturbance and interruption of
commercial and social activities.
The impact will be highest in
areas of higher population
density, and less important in
low density (more rural) areas.
3. HEALTH
(a) Public Health
In the tropical climate of
Nigeria, stagnant water which
may form in pits, holes,
excavated ditches etc, at
construction sites creates a
habitat for insect disease vectors
such as malaria, which within
the urban context of the project
activities, is an issue of
importance
Before
begins
Daily
Complaints from the
project site residents.
construction
During operation
maintenance phase
During operation
maintenance phase
Complaints from the
project site residents
and hospital record
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
Daily
During construction,
operation and
maintenance phase
119
and
and
SUPERVISION
(v) Alternative route(s) or side of the road will
be recommended by the consultant were
feasible to avoid or minimize impacts.
(vii) Establishment of traffic plans at locations
of blockage roads, and implementation of
appropriate traffic control at such locations.
Project Engineers of
CRSWBL
Nil
EPAD
(viii) Informing the local communities of the
construction and maintenance programme
through for local FM radio stations should it
be required that public services will be
disrupted.
See 2(a)(i)
(i) Stagnant water on construction sites should
be avoided through proper maintenance of the
site and through the removal of water from
ditches especially after rainfall or groundwater
infiltration to avoid the breeding disease
vectors such as mosquitoes. This should be
done by the use of water pumps whenever
necessary.
N 20,000
($125)
Contractor/
supervising
consultant
Contractor/
supervising
consultant
M & E officer/
Environmental
Officer
Project Engineers of
EPAD
M & E officer/
Environmental officer
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
.
POTENTIAL IMPACT
Operational failures are peculiar
with piped water distribution
system. Since drinking water is
treated before entering the
network and not at the actual
distribution point in the houses
(the traditional way), anything
happening to the water in
between will directly pose
public health risks. Ruptures of
pipelines
and
structural
degradation of pipelines as a
result of ageing and poor
maintenance, accompanied by
low pressure in pipes will allow
the intrusion of potentially
polluted groundwater into the
drinking water distribution
system.
Another issue may be the
realization
of
branched
connections (e.g. for new area
or to households), if not done
in a proper manner. Part of
such connections may be illegal.
The impact in the case of
ruptures in the vicinity of open
or damaged sewers, the drainage
system (often operating as an
open sewer) or other areas of
high level pollution such as
landfills and industrial zones is
particularly sensitive will pose a
serious health risk to those who
are supplied water from such
network.
MONITORING
INDICATORS
MONITORING
PARAMETERS
MONITORING
FREQUENCY
During, operation and
maintenance phase
Complaints from the
project site residents
and hospital record
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Daily
120
MITIGATION MEASURES
(ii) During the operation and maintenance
phase, care must be taken to make sure the
pipeline ROW’s is kept in order to avoid
indigenes building new structure on or
within the pipeline ROW’s. This may course
ruptures in the already laid pipes particularly
in the laying of residential foundations.
MITIGATIONC
OST
ESTIMATE
NAIRA (US$)
RESPONSIBILITY
IMPLEMENTATION
Contractor/
supervising
consultant
SUPERVISION
Project Engineers of
EPAD
M & E officer/
Environmental officer
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
.
POTENTIAL IMPACT
Flooding with consequential
effects, may occur due to
rupture of pipelines as a result
of leaks and accidents. Possible
occurrence of overflow of the
drainage systems and open
sewers is particularly hazardous
in the vicinity of concentrated
pollutants such as landfills and
industrial zones. This may also
have its impacts on insects and
waterborne disease vectors,
which poses as public health
risk.
MONITORING
INDICATORS
MONITORING
PARAMETERS
MONITORING
FREQUENCY
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Complaints from the
project site residents
and hospital record
During, operation and
maintenance phase
Complaints from the
project site residents
and hospital record
During
phase
Complaints from the
project site residents
and hospital record
During
phase
MITIGATION MEASURES
MITIGATIONC
OST
ESTIMATE
NAIRA (US$)
RESPONSIBILITY
IMPLEMENTATION
SUPERVISION
(b) Health Problems From
Construction Camps And
Sites, And Imported Labour
In the case of badly managed
construction camps and work
sites public health problems
may occur, although in this case
it is not expected that large
construction camps will be
established, or that work sites
will be large enough to cause
important hazards to the general
populate. In view of the
magnitude of works, the
number of imported labourers
will not be substantial, not
withstanding the issues of
increase or introduction of
HIV and AIDS and also social
vices will not be under
estimated.
Complaints from the
project site residents
and hospital record
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
construction,
(i) Imported workers if used should have
proper housing and sanitary.
Project Engineers of
CRSWBL
Monthly
Weekly
construction,
During
phase
construction,
During
phase
construction,
121
(ii) The number of imported workers should
be reduced to the minimum while the use of
local workers should be encouraged.
Contractor/
supervising
consultant
(iii) HIV and AIDS awareness and lecture
should be given to the workers so as to reduce
the spread of the disease among the locals.
N 60,000
($375)
(iv) Contraceptives should be distributed free
among the workers
N 100,000
($625)
EPAD
M & E officer/
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
.
POTENTIAL IMPACT
MONITORING
INDICATORS
(c) Occupational Health And
Safety
Construction works such as:
excavations; working with heavy
equipment; working in confined
spaces; working on and along
the traffic roads; heavy lifting,
storage, handling and use of
dangerous
substances
and
wastes, working under noisy and
harsh weather conditions will
expose
the
workers
to
occupational health and safety
risks
During maintenances phase of
the project, maintenance staff
may have to work close to the
road and within the ROW’s.
This may result in knock down
hazards to the maintenance
4. EROSION
(a) Soil Erosion
Water pipeline construction for
the network distribution of
water entails clearance of
vegetation from site and the
usage of heavy equipment for
the work. The compaction of
soil by heavy equipment and
MONITORING
PARAMETERS
MONITORING
FREQUENCY
Daily
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
During
phase
MITIGATION MEASURES
MITIGATIONC
OST
ESTIMATE
Naira (US$)
RESPONSIBILITY
IMPLEMENTATION
SUPERVISION
construction,
(i) Labourers should adhere to basic rules.
Daily
During construction,
operation and
maintenance activities
(ii) Safety signs such as ‘MEN AT WORK’
should be mounted were and when workers
are working so as to alert motorist In addition,
work sites must be clearly demarcated with
ropes and tapes
2(a)(iv)
Daily
(iii) Safety gadgets such as boots, nose guards
and helmets should be provided
Rate of casualty
Erosion and turbidity
of surface water.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
Daily
During construction,
operation and
maintenance activities
Daily
During construction,
operation and
maintenance activities
During
phase
construction
122
N 200,000
($1250)
Contractor/
supervising
consultant
Project Engineers of
EPAD
M & E officer/
Environmental
Officer
(iv) Contractor should ensure that workers
wear their safety gadget such as helmets, nose
guards and boots. Also to observe all safety
percussion.
.
(vi) There should be a First Aid Box
ALWAYS on each site incase of mishaps
(i) Where civil works involves working on
slopes and human stream beddings,
appropriate erosion protection measures
should be taken. An alternate drainage route
should be provided.
N 40,000
($250)
Contractor/
supervising
consultant
Project Engineers of
EPAD
Environmental officer
of CRSWBL
M & E officer/
Environmental
Officer
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
.
POTENTIAL IMPACT
loss of vegetation cover tends to
accelerate
erosion
activity
leading to secondary impacts
such as soil instability, landslides
in undulating landform and also
surface water pollution due to
runoff, Nevertheless most of
the
pipeline
construction
activities will take place along
existing
roads
and
not
undulating landforms thereby
reducing erosion impact to a
minimum.
MONITORING
INDICATORS
MONITORING
PARAMETERS
MONITORING
FREQUENCY
Daily
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
MITIGATION MEASURES
During
construction,
operation
and
maintenance activities
(ii) Excavation works should
undertaken under aggressive
conditions such as under heavy
which will accelerate erosion
excavated earth.
During
construction,
operation
and
maintenance activities
(iii) Top soils when removed, should be
stored until after the trenches have been
filled only then should it be re- instated
5. FLORA AND FAUNA
(a) Impacts On Flora And
Fauna
As the construction will require
removal of natural vegetation
for the proposed new pipeline
extension which may lead to
habitat destruction of natural
existing fauna. Although most
of the new pipeline extension
work will
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
RESPONSIBILITY
IMPLEMENTATION
SUPERVISION
not be
weather
rain fall
of the
Erosion and turbidity
of surface water.
The clearance of sites of
vegetation will be required for
the inspection and maintenance
of the water distribution
network.
Inappropriate
practices and soil protection
measures will induce or
accelerate erosion, leading to
soil instability
MITIGATIONC
OST
ESTIMATE
NAIRA (US$)
During, operation and
maintenance activities
(iv) De-vegetation should be reduced to
work areas, and top soil removed to access
pipelines should be stored and after
maintenance, replaced.
During construction,
operation and
maintenance phase
(i) The Contractor and maintenance staff
should minimize the work site to the
minimum possible size in an attempt to
minimize the destruction on flora were
found and thus prevent ecological damages.
Project Engineers of
EPAD
Contractor/
supervising
consultant
Environmental officer
of CRSWBL
M & E Officer/
Environmental
Officer
Daily
Daily
123
Contractor/
supervising
consultant
Project Engineers of
CRSWBL
Environmental officer
of EPAD
M & E officer/
Environmental
Officer
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
.
POTENTIAL IMPACT
MONITORING
INDICATORS
MONITORING
PARAMETERS
MONITORING
FREQUENCY
IMPLEMENTA-TION
SCHEDULE
MITIGATION MEASURES
MITIGATIONC
OST
ESTIMATE
NAIRA($)
occur along existing roads or
ROWs with less bushes and
shrubs
removal
making
vegetation impact to be low due
to low ecological value
RESPONSIBILITY
IMPLEMENTATION
SUPERVISION
Contractor/
supervising
consultant
Project Engineers of
CRSWBL
Environmental officer
of EPAD
M & E officer/
Environmental Officer
(b)
Access
Due
To
Construction Of Pipeline Row’s
Through Bush And Forest Land
In areas were the pipelines
extensions require the creation
of new ROW’s through forest
land. This might result in
improved access to natural sites
previously less accessible which
will lead to alteration of the
native ecosystem
During construction, phase
Sustainable Development Consultants
Contractor/
supervising
consultant
Project Engineers
CRSWBL
Environmental
of EPAD
of
officer
M & E officer/
Environmental Officer
During construction, phase
Earthguards Limited:
(i) The appropriate authority’s consent
should be sought before any tree is fell.
Also fees and fines should be paid
where necessary in accordance to
EPAD regulations and standards.
124
(ii) Ecological restoration through
environmental engineering should be
undertaken
after
any
human
intervention. This may include
restoration of top soils and
introduction of new species to restore
the local ecology
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
.
POTENTIAL IMPACT
MONITORING
INDICATORS
MONITORING
PARAMETERS
MONITORING
FREQUENCY
IMPLEMENTATION
SCHEDULE
MITIGATION MEASURES
MITIGATIONC
OST ESTIMATE
NAIRA (US$)
RESPONSIBILITY
IMPLEMENTATION
6. WASTE GENERATION
(a) Solid Waste Generation
Waste will be produced by
clearance of trees and bush on
pipeline ROW’s. The amounts
of waste produces will be
much more than in the
operation and maintenance
phase.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
(i) Collection and temporary storage of
cleaning and sanitary wastes, as well as
garbage, in containers.
(ii) The Contractor should prepare a Solid
Waste Management Plan, which should
include
+A detailed list of the types and
quantities of waste to be produced,
including their hazard classes.
+An assessment of any opportunities
for reducing solid waste generation,
in particular of hazardous and
undesirable (persistent and non-reusable) types of wastes.
+The most appropriate waste
management
plan
should
be
determined for each type of solid
waste. This should include details on
(temporary) storage, transport and a
final destination for the waste. With
regards to the latter, the most
appropriate way would be reuse,
followed by recycling/ recovery and
finally disposal or incineration.
+How and by whom the waste
management measures would be
implemented Contractor or third
party- specifying any such third party
involvement.
(iii) Records of types, quantities, origins,
(temporary) storage, transport and
elimination/ reuse of solid waste must be
kept by the Contractor, and He/ She
should make these available to the works
supervisor upon his request, as proof of
proper waste management practices
Weekly
125
SUPERVISION
Project Engineers of
CRSWBL
Contractor/
supervising
consultant
EPAD
M & E officer/
Environmental
Officer
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
.
POTENTIAL IMPACT
MONITORING
INDICATORS
MONITORING
PARAMETERS
MONITORING
FREQUENCY
IMPLEMENT
A-TION
SCHEDULE
MITIGATION MEASURES
MITIGATION COST
ESTIMATE NAIRA
(US$)
RESPONSIBILITY
IMPLEMENTATION
Waste
generated
from
construction workers such as
used pure water sachets, waste, etc.
Waste sludge
Sand and suspended particulate
matters will be generated during
water treatment
(b) Waste Water
The aeration and sedimentation
activities is expected to generate
waste water
(iv) Waste disposals should occur at only
site approved by the authorities.
Project Engineers
of CRSWBL
(v) Recycling companies should be used
in transferring and, recycling and
disposing of waste
EPAD
M & E officer/
Environmental
Officer
1) Sludge produced should be treated and
used as manure for agriculture
Weekly





BODs
COD
Total nitrogen
Total Phosphorus
Number of faecal
coliforms






mg O2/l
15 mg O2/l
10 mg N/l
0.6 mg N/l
5 x 10 5 TC/l
104 FC/l
Daily
During operation
and maintenance
phase
Once after water
treatment
operation
1) The sludge/Waste water generated
shall be transported to a waste water
treatment plant
to be built in the
facility
(i) Since the increase in energy
consumption will not be substantial it is
therefore advised that as much as possible
the use of electrical power from PHCN
should be used since it is more sustainable
(cheaper and renewable) in place of diesel
operated generators.
Sub- Total (Mitigation Cost)
Sustainable Development Consultants
2) Stabilized sludge, freed from any excess
water, with the dry substance content of
no less than 20%, should be collected in
separate closed tanks and transported to
the EPAD designated disposal site for
this category.
N 120,000
($750)
Contractor/
supervising
consultant
126
Project Engineers
of CRSWBL
EPAD
M & E officer/
Environmental
Officer
Contractor/
supervising
consultant
Project Engineers
of CRSWBL
EPAD
2). The waste materials from the screens
and the sand trap shall be collected in
closed tanks and transported daily to the
designated disposal site in line with the
EPAD standards.
7.ENERGY CONSUMPTION
The use of energy for the
distribution of water will be
required. The relative increase in
energy consumption as a result of
the extensions to the pipeline
distribution system is, however, not
expected to be substantial.
Earthguards Limited:
SUPERVISION
M & E officer/
Environmental
Officer
Contractor/
supervising
consultant
Project Engineers
of CRSWBL
M & E officer/
Environmental
Officer
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
.
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
9
PUBLIC CONSULTATION
9.1
Introduction
The consultation process and outcome was seen by the consultant as both an early and mandatory exercise in
terms of the objective of project sustainability and as the best strategy to achieving the overall scope of the
activities of the ESIA.
Consultation Strategy
The Public Consultation process for the project began during the early stage of reconnaissance level-survey.
The consultant, after familiarization meetings with the client (Cross River State Water Board Limited)
requested for the contacts of all the area managers in the project areas. This was important not only to
facilitate the reconnaissance survey of the project environment, but also to facilitate the process of meeting
with other stakeholders.
The consultant with the assistance of CRSWBL staff in the designated areas identified the stakeholders and
they include:
 Community leaders,
 Community associations;
 Women Associations
 Youths
 Local Government Authorities,
 Cross River State Water Board Limited.
A familiarization visitation was made to the various institutions and concerned stakeholders and the outcome
were:
 Scheduling of meeting dates which was to incorporate a larger audience from the various
stakeholders.
 Organization of locations for the public consultations.
Summary of the Public Consultations
The proceedings took the form of:
 Introduction of the project to community members and stakeholders;
 Informing them of the locations for the proposed installations/plants and the nature of the project;
 Entertaining comments and questions from stakeholders, and
 Addressing concerns raised by stakeholders.
The list of attendance at the public consultations is found in appendix 5, while Table 9.1 captures the
summary of the proceedings and outcomes of the public consultations. It also provided
comments/suggestions that may be suitable to the concerns raised and general observations made about the
project areas.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
127
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
.
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Table 9.1: Summary of Public Consultations in Abi, Obubra and Yala
DATE
20/09/09
LGA
ABI
LOCATION OF
MEETING
MAJOR CONCERNS
They express their deep concern about the
inability to get constant flow of water supply,
that, water is life and essential if it is denied,
the community is also denied by the CRSWBL.
ITIGIDI TOWN
HALL
COMMENTS
1). There was high level
expression of happiness for
the project.
2)The response to to pay
water bill as and when due
was high
EMINEKPON
The people of the area experience high cost of
water especially during dry season.
3) Water distribution kiosk
should be constructed in
several places to make for
proximity for the people.
4). To ensure the
sustainability of the project,
CRSWBL should lease with
local middle men to
site/construct several points
of water distribution kiosks
in the villages.
20/09/09
OBUBRA
21/09/09
18/09/09
YALA
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
The people of the community want the
CRSWBL to engage their youths during
project implementation for protection of
facilities.
ADUN BEACH
ABABENE
1). There has been several failed promises
regarding infrastructural development in the
area by past governments
2). There are incidences of sicknesses such as
arthritis and typhoid which may be due to
sufferings imposed by proximity to and lack
of portable water
3). There are cases of River blindness and
guinea worm
CHIEF’S PALACE
IDIGBO. OPKOMA.
1). The people of the area experience high cost
of water especially during dry season.
2).Available boreholes in the area have high
levels of salinity
3).There is poor access road to the streams and
farms in the area
128
5). It may be necessary to
extend water only to
households that request by
application.
6). Further to comment no 5
the public consultation was
used to sensitize community
members about this. The
awareness needs to continue
during project
implementation.
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
.
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
REFERENCES
SGI Ingenierie SA of Geneva, Consulting (2009), Inception Report of the Feasibility Studies & Detailed
Engineering Design for the Rehabilitation/Construction of the Water Production & Distribution System for
Itigidi, Obubra and Okpoma.
Earthguards Limited (2009), Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report for the Water
Production, Rehabilitation and Extension Scheme in Ikom, Obudu and Ogoja,
World Bank Financed National Urban Water Sector Reform Project (NUWSRP 1) Environmental and
Social Management Framework Document (2008)
Environ Quest (2008), Final Report on Urban Works Rehabilitation – Environmental Management Plan no:
E1425, Vol 3.
IFC (2007), Handbook on General Environmental Health and Safety Guidelines
IFC (2007), Handbook on Health, and Safety Guidelines for Water and Sanitation
IFC (2007), General Environmental Health and safety Guidelines for Cement and Lime Manufacturing.
Edgar Rojas (2005), Assessment of Environmental and Social Risks in Loan and Investment Projects
Water Sector Restructuring Project Ghana “Resettlement Training Plan (2004),” no: 9P2503, Ref:
9P2503/R/FG/Rott1
Peter Scheren/MartineLeman/Henk Blok – Royal Haskoning (2004), Water Sector Restructuring Project
“Environmental Assessment and Management Plan” no: 9P2503, Ref: RH/Nijm/R02/PS/ML/HB
Philip Stapleton & Margaret Glover (2001) Environmental Management System: An Implementation Guide
for Small and Medium-Sized Organizations
World Bank (1999), Safeguard Policies: Operational/Bank Policy 4.01
World Bank (1998), Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook
Cross River State Environmental Protection Edicts (1994)
National Air Quality Guidelines for maximum exposure (Daily average of hourly values) Table 111-3,
Section 4.4.5(EGASPIN – revicesed2002)
GKW Consult (1994), Final Report on Rehabilitation/Expansion of Itigidi and Obubra Water Schemes.
Nigerian Ambient Air Quality Standard, Guidelines and Standards for environmental pollution control in
Nigeria (FEPA)
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
129
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
.
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
APPENDICIES
Appendix 1: List of ESIA Preparers
NO
NAMES
POSITION
1
Mr. Joseph Akpokodje
Environmental/Resettlement Specialist/ Team Leader
2
Mike Toko
Chemical Specialist
3
Ovie Akpokodje
Civil Engineering/Water Specialist
4
Mr Omezikam Onuoha
Environmental Biology Specialist
5
Mr Oliver Nwuju
Socio-Economist Specialist
6
Mr. Anthony Ekpenkhio
Environmental Assistant
7
Mr. Sebastine Iyobhebhe
GIS Specialist
8
Max Uma
Environmental Management Assistant
9
Tope Ajayi
HSE /Waste Management Specialist
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
130
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
.
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Appendix 2: Summary of World Bank Environmental and Social Safeguard Policies

Environmental Assessment (OP 4.01). Outlines Bank policy and procedure for the environmental
assessment of Bank lending operations. The Bank undertakes environmental screening of each proposed
project to determine the appropriate extent and type of EA process. This environmental process will apply
to all CRS-NUWSRP 2 sub-projects.

Natural Habitats (OP 4.04). The conservation of natural habitats, like other measures that protect and
enhance the environment, is essential for long-term sustainable development. The Bank does not support
projects involving the significant conversion of natural habitats unless there are no feasible alternatives for
the project and its siting, and comprehensive analysis demonstrates that overall benefits from the project
substantially outweigh the environmental costs. If the environmental assessment indicates that a project
would significantly convert or degrade natural habitats, the project includes mitigation measures acceptable
to the Bank. Such mitigation measures include, as appropriate, minimizing habitat loss (e.g. strategic habitat
retention and post-development restoration) and establishing and maintaining an ecologically similar
protected area. The Bank accepts other forms of mitigation measures only when they are technically
justified. Should the sub-project-specific EMPs indicate that natural habitats might be affected negatively by
the proposed sub-project activities without suitable mitigation measures, such sub-projects will not be
funded under the project.

Pest Management (OP 4.09). The policy supports safe, affective, and environmentally sound pest
management. It promotes the use of biological and environmental control methods. An assessment is made
of the capacity of the country’s regulatory framework and institutions to promote and support safe,
effective, and environmentally sound pest management. This policy will most likely not apply to CRSNUWSRP2 sub-projects.

Involuntary Resettlement (OP 4.12). This policy covers direct economic and social impacts that both
result from Bank-assisted investment projects, and are caused by (a) the involuntary taking of land resulting
in (i) relocation or loss of shelter; (ii) loss of assets or access to assets, or (iii) loss of income sources or
means of livelihood, whether or not the affected persons must move to another location; or (b) the
involuntary restriction of access to legally designated parks and protected areas resulting in adverse impacts
on the livelihoods of the displaced persons. This policy will most likely not apply to the project, as it will not
entail taking of land or restriction of access to sources of livelihood.

Indigenous Peoples (OD 4.20). This directive provides guidance to ensure that indigenous peoples benefit
from development projects, and to avoid or mitigate adverse effects of Bank-financed development projects
on indigenous peoples. Measures to address issues pertaining to indigenous peoples must be based on the
informed participation of the indigenous people themselves. Sub-projects that would have negative impacts
on indigenous people will not be funded under CRS-NUWSRP2.

Forests (OP 4.36). This policy applies to the following types of Bank-financed investment projects: (a)
projects that have or may have impacts on the health and quality of forests; (b) projects that affect the rights
and welfare of people and their level of dependence upon or interaction with forests; and (c) projects that
aim to bring about changes in the management, protection, or utilization of natural forests or plantations,
whether they are publicly, privately, or communally owned. The Bank does not finance projects that, in its
opinion, would involve significant conversion or degradation of critical forest areas or related critical
habitats. If a project involves the significant conversion or degradation of natural forests or related natural
habitats that the Bank determines are not critical, and the Bank determines that there are no feasible
alternatives to the project and its siting, and comprehensive analysis demonstrates that overall benefits from
the project substantially outweigh the environmental costs, the Bank may finance the project provided that it
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
131
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
.
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
incorporates appropriate mitigation measures. Sub-projects that are likely to have negative impacts on
forests will not be funded under the project

Cultural Property (OP 11.03). The term “cultural property” includes sites having archeological
(prehistoric), paleontological, historical, religious, and unique natural values. The Bank’s general policy
regarding cultural property is to assist in their preservation, and to seek to avoid their elimination.
Specifically, the Bank (i) normally declines to finance projects that will significantly damage non-replicable
cultural property, and will assist only those projects that are sited or designed so as to prevent such damage;
and (ii) will assist in the protection and enhancement of cultural properties encountered in Bank-financed
projects, rather than leaving that protection to chance. The management of cultural property of a country is
the responsibility of the government. The government’s attention should be drawn specifically to what is
known about the cultural property aspects of the proposed project site and appropriate agencies, NGOs, or
university departments should be consulted; if there are any questions concerning cultural property in the
area, a brief reconnaissance survey should be undertaken in the field by a specialist.

Safety of Dams (OP 4.37). For the life of any dam, the owner is responsible for ensuring that appropriate
measures are taken and sufficient resources provided for the safety to the dam, irrespective of its funding
sources or construction status. The Bank distinguishes between small and large dams. Small dams are
normally less than 15 m in height; this category includes, for example, farm ponds, local silt retention dams,
and low embankment tanks. For small dams, generic dam safety measures designed by qualified engineers
are usually adequate. This policy does apply to the project and the mitigatory measures via the preparation of
a dam safety status report have already been undertaken.

Projects on International Waterways (O 7.50). The Bank recognizes that the cooperation and good will
of riparian is essential for the efficient utilization and protection of international waterways and attaches
great importance to riparian making appropriate agreements or arrangement for the entire waterway or any
part thereof. Projects that trigger this policy include hydroelectric, irrigation, flood control, navigation,
drainage, water and sewerage, industrial, and similar projects that involve the use or potential pollution of
international waterways. This policy will not apply to the project.

Disputed Areas (OP/BP/GP 7.60). Project in disputed areas may occur between the Bank and its
member countries as well as between the borrower and one or more neighbouring countries. Any dispute
over an area in which a proposed project is located requires formal procedures at the earliest possible stage.
The Bank attempts to acquire assurance that it may proceed with a project in a disputed area if the
governments concerned agree that, pending the settlement of the dispute, the project proposed can go
forward without prejudice to the claims of the country having a dispute. This policy is not expected to be
triggered by CRS-NUSRP2 sub-projects.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
132
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Appendix 3:- Socio-Economic Data Questionnaire
SECTION A. IDENTIFICATION
1)
Identification Number
2)
Questionnaire administration from point of entry (a) Left side…….(b) Right side………
3)
Landmark(s) at point of entry …………………………………………………………….
4)
Town/Location of Interview: ………………………………………………………………….
5)
Name and Signature of Interviewer: ……………………………………………………………
6)
Name and Signature of Supervisor: …………………………………………………………….
7)
Date: …………………………………………………………………………………………..
8)
Time Interview Started: ………………………… Time Ended: ………………………………..
SECTION B: SOCIOECONOMIC ATTRIBUTES
1)
Name of Household Head ……………………………………………………
2)
Name of Respondent ………………………………………………………….
3)
Relationship of Respondent to Household Head …………………………………
a) Wife 1 of HH
b) Son of HH
c) Daughter of HH
d) Father of HH
e) Mother of HH
f) Brother of HH
g) Sister of HH
h) Others Specify:
4)
House Address ………………………………………………………..
5)
Sex (M)…… (F)…….
6)
Age ………………………..
7)
Religion (Christian)…… (Moslem)…… (Traditional)…… (Others)…..
8)
One)
Marital Status (Single)…… (Married)…… (Divorced)……. (Widow/Widower)……. (Please Tick
9)
Number of wives …………………………
10)
How long have you lived in this community …………………………..
11)
How many persons live in your Household (i.e. Eat from the same pot)…………
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
133
(Please Tick One)
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
12)
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
How many persons in your house hold fall into the following age categories?
Categories
0-4yrs
5-9yrs
10-14yrs
15-19yrs
20-24yrs
25-29yrs
30-34yrs
35-39yrs
40-44yrs
45-49yrs
50-54yrs
55-59yrs
60-64yrs
65-above
Total
Male
Female
Total
13)
What is your highest educational qualification?
(i) None … (ii) FSLC … (iii) WASC/SSCE … (iv) TCII/OND ….
(v) HND/Degree … (vi) MSc/PhD … (vii) Islamic studies…..
14)
How many members of your household fall under the following educational categories?
Categories
Primary School (attempted/still attending)
Primary School-Completed (Living Certificate)
Secondary School (attempted/still attending)
Secondary School-Completed (O’Levels)
Tertiary Institution (attempted/ still attending)
Tertiary Institution (Completed)
Islamic Studies
Total
Male
Female
Total
15) What is your Occupation (indicate the category you belong to and the level/profession):
Category
Senior Mgt Staff
Middle level Staff
Junior Staff
Professional
Artisan
Businessman
Part time
Others
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
Public sector
employee
Private sector
employee
134
Self
employed
Student
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
16). How many employed members of your household are engaged in occupation listed below?
Categories
Farming
Mining
Hunting
Craft making
Trading
Civil service
Company employment
Self employment
Housewife
Total
Male
Female
Total
17) What is your Annual Income?
i) N0 –50,000……ii) N 51, 000- 100,000…….iii) N 100,101- 500,000……iv) N 500,000 and above……
If Not Known, what is your Monthly income……………….OR Daily income……………..
18) Estimate the monthly/annual income of other members of your household.i) N 0 – 50,000……
ii) N 51, 000- 100,000……
iii) N 100,101- 500,000…iv)N 500,000 and above…….
SECTION C: AVAILABILITY OF AMENITIES
19) How would you describe the condition of the following amenities in town you live/community?
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Roads to the community
Roads within the community
Schools in the community
Public Health Institutions
Potable Water
Public Electricity
Communication facilities
(Postal Service, Telephone)
Public recreation facilities
20).
What is the major source of water available to your household? (Please Tick One)
i.
River ……………………
ii. Borehole_ (commercial)……………
iii.
Pond ………………………
iv. Borehole
(private)………………
v
Public pipe-borne water …………
vi. Water Vendor
……………….
vii.
Well water…………..
21)
If a public pipe borne water, how regular does the tap flow in a week?
(i) Regularly -------------------(ii) Occasionally ………..
(iii) Rarely ………………………
22)
How long does it take you in minutes/hours to get to your water source ………………….
23).
How much do you spend/pay in a month for water bill? ………………………
24).
Estimate the number of gallons of water you use in your household daily? _____
25).
If you purchase water daily, how much do you spend ……………………………………
26a.)
Are you willing to pay more for a better service? Yes……….No……. (Tick One)
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
135
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
26b)
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
State the minimum and maximum amount you are willing to pay monthly?
Monthly
Cost
Minimum
amount
Maximum
amount
N 3000
N2000
N 1500
N 1000
N 500
N300
N200
27)
If not, what are your reasons?
(i)………………………………………………………………………………
(ii)…………………………………………………………………………………………
(iii)……………………………………………………………………………….…………
28) . What is the primary source of electricity/ light to your community? (Please Tick One)
i) Hurricane Lamp ………
ii)
Private Generators………..
iii) Community Generators……… iv)
State Government Utilities Board………
v) Company Operating in your community…….vi) PHCN (National Grid)……
29)
What is the secondary source of electricity? (Please Tick One)
i)
Hurricane Lamp …………… ii)
Private Generators…………
iii) Community Generators………iv) Company Operating in your community………
30)
What is the main fuel you use for cooking? (Please Tick One)
i) Firewood ……………. ..ii)
Charcoal…………..
iii) Kerosene/ Oil ………. iv)
Gas……………
v) Electricity …………… .vi)
Crop residue/ Saw dust……………
vii) Animal Wastes ……… .viii)
Others
31)
What type of toilet facility do you use? (Please Tick One)
i) Pit………… ……ii)
Bush…………
iii) Prier Head………iv)
Bucket…………
v) Water Closet…… vi)
Others (Specify)……
32)
How do you dispose of your household refuse?
(Please Tick one)
i) Private Open Dump
ii) Public Open Dump
iii Organized Collection
iv) Burning
v) Bush
vi) Burying
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
136
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Appendix 4: Construction Contracts Environmental Management Conditions
General
1. In addition to these general conditions, the Contractor shall comply with any specific Environmental
Management Plan (EMP) or Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) for the works he is
responsible for. The Contractor shall inform himself about such an EMP, and prepare his work strategy and plan
to fully take into account relevant provisions of that EMP. If the Contractor fails to implement the approved
EMP after written instruction by the Supervising Engineer (SE) to fulfill his obligation within the requested
time, the Owner reserves the right to arrange through the SE for execution of the missing action by a third party
on account of the Contractor.
2. Notwithstanding the Contractor’s obligation under the above clause, the Contractor shall implement all measures
necessary to avoid undesirable adverse environmental and social impacts wherever possible, restore work sites to
acceptable standards, and abide by any environmental performance requirements specified in an EMP. In
general these measures shall include but not be limited to:
(a) Minimize the effect of dust on the surrounding environment resulting from earth mixing sites, asphalt
mixing sites, dispersing coal ashes, vibrating equipment, temporary access roads, etc. to ensure safety, health and
the protection of workers and communities living in the vicinity of dust producing activities.
(b) Ensure that noise levels emanating from machinery, vehicles and noisy construction activities (e.g.
excavation, blasting) are kept at a minimum for the safety, health and protection of workers within the vicinity of
high noise levels and nearby communities.
(c) Ensure that existing water flow regimes in rivers, streams and other natural or irrigation channels is
maintained and/or re-established where they are disrupted due to works being carried out.
(d) Prevent bitumen, oils, lubricants and waste water used or produced during the execution of works from
entering into rivers, streams, irrigation channels and other natural water bodies/reservoirs, and also ensure that
stagnant water in uncovered borrow pits is treated in the best way to avoid creating possible breeding grounds
for mosquitoes.
(e) Prevent and minimize the impacts of quarrying, earth borrowing, piling and building of temporary
construction camps and access roads on the biophysical environment including protected areas and arable lands;
local communities and their settlements. In as much as possible restore/rehabilitate all sites to acceptable
standards.
(f) Upon discovery of ancient heritage, relics or anything that might or believed to be of archeological or
historical importance during the execution of works, immediately report such findings to the SE so that the
appropriate authorities may be expeditiously contacted for fulfillment of the measures aimed at protecting such
historical or archaeological resources.
(g) Discourage construction workers from engaging in the exploitation of natural resources such as hunting,
fishing, and collection of forest products or any other activity that might have a negative impact on the social and
economic welfare of the local communities.
(h) Implement soil erosion control measures in order to avoid surface run off and prevents siltation, etc.
(i) Ensure that garbage, sanitation and drinking water facilities are provided in construction workers camps.
(j) Ensure that, in as much as possible, local materials are used to avoid importation of foreign material and long
distance transportation.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
137
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
(k) Ensure public safety, and meet traffic safety requirements for the operation of work to avoid accidents.
3. The Contractor shall indicate the period within which he/she shall maintain status on site after completion of civil
works to ensure that significant adverse impacts arising from such works have been appropriately addressed.
4. The Contractor shall adhere to the proposed activity implementation schedule and the monitoring plan / strategy
to ensure effective feedback of monitoring information to project management so that impact management can
be implemented properly, and if necessary, adapt to changing and unforeseen conditions.
5. Besides the regular inspection of the sites by the Supervising Engineer for adherence to the contract conditions
and specifications, the Owner may appoint an Inspector to oversee the compliance with these environmental
conditions and any proposed mitigation measures. State environmental authorities may carry out similar
inspection duties. In all cases, as directed by the SE, the Contractor shall comply with directives from such
inspectors to implement measures required to ensure the adequacy rehabilitation measures carried out on the
bio-physical environment and compensation for socio-economic disruption resulting from implementation of
any works.
Worksite/Campsite Waste Management
6. All vessels (drums, containers, bags, etc.) containing oil/fuel/surfacing materials and other hazardous chemicals
shall be bonded in order to contain spillage. All waste containers, litter and any other waste generated during the
construction shall be collected and disposed off at designated disposal sites in line with applicable government
waste management regulations.
7. All drainage and effluent from storage areas, workshops and camp sites shall be captured and treated before being
discharged into the drainage system in line with applicable government water pollution control regulations.
8. Used oil from maintenance shall be collected and disposed off appropriately at designated sites or be re-used or
sold for re-use locally.
9. Entry of runoff to the site shall be restricted by constructing diversion channels or holding structures such as
banks, drains, dams, etc. to reduce the potential of soil erosion and water pollution.
10. Construction waste shall not be left in stockpiles along the road, but removed and reused or disposed of on a
daily basis.
11. If disposal sites for clean spoil are necessary, they shall be located in areas, approved by the SE, of low land use
value and where they will not result in material being easily washed into drainage channels. Whenever possible,
spoil materials should be placed in low-lying areas and should be compacted and planted with species indigenous
to the locality.
Material Excavation and Deposit
12. The Contractor shall obtain appropriate licenses/permits from relevant authorities to operate quarries or borrow
areas.
13. The location of quarries and borrow areas shall be subject to approval by relevant local and national authorities,
including traditional authorities if the land on which the quarry or borrow areas fall in traditional land.
14. New extraction sites:
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
138
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
a) Shall not be located in the vicinity of settlement areas, cultural sites, wetlands or any other valued ecosystem
component, or on high or steep ground or in areas of high scenic value, and shall not be located less than 1km
from such areas.
b) Shall not be located adjacent to stream channels wherever possible to avoid siltation of river channels. Where
they are located near water sources, borrow pits and perimeter drains shall surround quarry sites.
c) Shall not be located in archaeological areas. Excavations in the vicinity of such areas shall proceed with great
care and shall be done in the presence of government authorities having a mandate for their protection.
d) Shall not be located in forest reserves. However, where there are no other alternatives, permission shall be
obtained from the appropriate authorities and an environmental impact study shall be conducted.
e) Shall be easily rehabilitated. Areas with minimal vegetation cover such as flat and bare ground, or areas
covered with grass only or covered with shrubs less than 1.5m in height, are preferred.
f) Shall have clearly demarcated and marked boundaries to minimize vegetation clearing.
15. Vegetation clearing shall be restricted to the area required for safe operation of construction work. Vegetation
clearing shall not be done more than two months in advance of operations.
16. Stockpile areas shall be located in areas where trees can act as buffers to prevent dust pollution. Perimeter drains
shall be built around stockpile areas. Sediment and other pollutant traps shall be located at drainage exits from
workings.
17. The Contractor shall deposit any excess material in accordance with the principles of these general conditions,
and any applicable EMP, in areas approved by local authorities and/or the SE.
18. Areas for depositing hazardous materials such as contaminated liquid and solid materials shall be approved by the
SE and appropriate local and/or national authorities before the commencement of work. Use of existing,
approved sites shall be preferred over the establishment of new sites.
Rehabilitation and Soil Erosion Prevention
19. To the extent practicable, the Contractor shall rehabilitate the site progressively so that the rate of rehabilitation
is similar to the rate of construction.
20. Always remove and retain topsoil for subsequent rehabilitation. Soils shall not be stripped when they are wet as
this can lead to soil compaction and loss of structure.
21. Topsoil shall not be stored in large heaps. Low mounds of no more than 1 to 2m high are recommended.
22. Revegetate stockpiles to protect the soil from erosion, discourage weeds and maintain an active population of
beneficial soil microbes.
23. Locate stockpiles where they will not be disturbed by future construction activities.
24. To the extent practicable, reinstate natural drainage patterns where they have been altered or impaired.
25. Remove toxic materials and dispose of them in designated sites. Backfill excavated areas with soils or
overburden that is free of foreign material that could pollute groundwater and soil.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
139
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
26. Identify potentially toxic overburden and screen with suitable material to prevent mobilization of toxins.
27. Ensure reshaped land is formed so as to be inherently stable, adequately drained and suitable for the desired
long-term land use, and allow natural regeneration of vegetation.
28. Minimize the long-term visual impact by creating landforms that are compatible with the adjacent landscape.
29. Minimize erosion by wind and water both during and after the process of reinstatement.
30. Compacted surfaces shall be deep ripped to relieve compaction unless subsurface conditions dictate otherwise.
31. Revegetate with plant species that will control erosion, provide vegetative diversity and, through succession,
contribute to a resilient ecosystem. The choice of plant species for rehabilitation shall be done in consultation
with local research institutions, forest department and the local people.
Water Resources Management
32. The Contractor shall at all costs avoid conflicting with water demands of local communities.
33. Abstraction of both surface and underground water shall only be done with the consultation of the local
community and after obtaining a permit from the relevant Water Authority.
34. Abstraction of water from wetlands shall be avoided. Where necessary, authority has to be obtained from
relevant authorities.
35. Temporary damming of streams and rivers shall be done in such a way avoids disrupting water supplies to
communities down stream, and maintains the ecological balance of the river system.
36. No construction water containing spoils or site effluent, especially cement and oil, shall be allowed to flow into
natural water drainage courses.
37. Wash water from washing out of equipment shall not be discharged into water courses or road drains.
38. Site spoils and temporary stockpiles shall be located away from the drainage system, and surface run off shall be
directed away from stockpiles to prevent erosion.
Traffic Management
39. Location of access roads/detours shall be done in consultation with the local community especially in important
or sensitive environments. Access roads shall not traverse wetland areas.
40. Upon the completion of civil works, all access roads shall be ripped and rehabilitated.
41. Access roads shall be sprinkled with water at least five times a day in settled areas, and three times in unsettled
areas, to suppress dust emissions.
Blasting
42. Blasting activities shall not take place less than 2km from settlement areas, cultural sites, or wetlands without the
permission of the SE.
43. Blasting activities shall be done during working hours, and local communities shall be consulted on the proposed
blasting times.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
140
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
44. Noise levels reaching the communities from blasting activities shall not exceed 90 decibels.
Disposal of Unusable Elements
45. Unusable materials and construction elements such as electro-mechanical equipment, pipes, accessories and
demolished structures will be disposed of in a manner approved by the SE. The Contractor has to agree with
the SE which elements are to be surrendered to the Client’s premises, which will be recycled or reused, and
which will be disposed of at approved landfill sites.
46. As far as possible, abandoned pipelines shall remain in place. Where for any reason no alternative alignment for
the new pipeline is possible, the old pipes shall be safely removed and stored at a safe place to be agreed upon
with the SE and the local authorities concerned.
47. AC-pipes as well as broken parts thereof have to be treated as hazardous material and disposed of as specified
above.
48. Unsuitable and demolished elements shall be dismantled to a size fitting on ordinary trucks for transport.
Health and Safety
49. In advance of the construction work, the Contractor shall mount an awareness and hygiene campaign. Workers
and local residents shall be sensitized on health risks particularly of AIDS.
50. Adequate road signs to warn pedestrians and motorists of construction activities, diversions, etc. shall be
provided at appropriate points.
51. Construction vehicles shall not exceed maximum speed limit of 40km per hour.
Repair of Private Property
52. Should the Contractor, deliberately or accidentally, damage private property, he shall repair the property to the
owner’s satisfaction and at his own cost. For each repair, the Contractor shall obtain from the owner a
certificate that the damage has been made good satisfactorily in order to indemnify the Client from subsequent
claims.
53. In cases where compensation for inconveniences, damage of crops etc. are claimed by the owner, the Client has
to be informed by the Contractor through the SE. This compensation is in general settled under the
responsibility of the Client before signing the Contract. In unforeseeable cases, the respective administrative
entities of the Client will take care of compensation
Contractor’s Health, Safety and Environment Management Plan (HSE-MP)
54. Within 6 weeks of signing the Contract, the Contractor shall prepare an EHS-MP to ensure the adequate
management of the health, safety, environmental and social aspects of the works, including implementation of
the requirements of these general conditions and any specific requirements of an EMP for the works. The
Contractor’s EHS-MP will serve two main purposes:
 For the Contractor, for internal purposes, to ensure that all measures are in place for adequate HSE
management, and as an operational manual for his staff.
 For the Client, supported where necessary by a SE, to ensure that the Contractor is fully prepared for the
adequate management of the HSE aspects of the project, and as a basis for monitoring of the Contractor’s
HSE performance.
55. The Contractor’s EHS-MP shall provide at least:
 a description of procedures and methods for complying with these general environmental management
conditions, and any specific conditions specified in an EMP;
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
141
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes



Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
a description of specific mitigation measures that will be implemented in order to minimize adverse impacts;
a description of all planned monitoring activities (e.g. sediment discharges from borrow areas) and the
reporting thereof; and
the internal organizational, management and reporting mechanisms put in place for such.
56. The Contractor’s EHS-MP will be reviewed and approved by the Client before start of the works. This review
should demonstrate if the Contractor’s EHS-MP covers all of the identified impacts, and has defined
appropriate measures to counteract any potential impacts.
HSE Reporting
57. The Contractor shall prepare bi-weekly progress reports to the SE on compliance with these general conditions,
the project EMP if any, and his own EHS-MP. An example format for a Contractor HSE report is given below.
It is expected that the Contractor’s reports will include information on:
 HSE management actions/measures taken, including approvals sought from local or national authorities;
 Problems encountered in relation to HSE aspects (incidents, including delays, cost consequences, etc. as a
result thereof);
 Lack of compliance with contract requirements on the part of the Contractor;
 Changes of assumptions, conditions, measures, designs and actual works in relation to HSE aspects; and
 Observations, concerns raised and/or decisions taken with regard to HSE management during site meetings.
58. It is advisable that reporting of significant HSE incidents be done “as soon as practicable”. Such incident
reporting shall therefore be done individually. Also, it is advisable that the Contractor keeps his own records on
health, safety and welfare of persons, and damage to property. It is advisable to include such records, as well as
copies of incident reports, as appendices to the bi-weekly reports. Example formats for an incident notification and
detailed report are given below. Details of HSE performance will be reported to the Client through the SE’s reports
to the Client.
Training of Contractor’s Personnel
59. The Contractor shall provide sufficient training to his own personnel to ensure that they are all aware of the
relevant aspects of these general conditions, any project EMP, and his own EHS-MP, and are able to fulfill their
expected roles and functions. Specific training should be provided to those employees that have particular
responsibilities associated with the implementation of the EHS-MP. General topics should be:
 HSE in general (working procedures);
 emergency procedures; and
 social and cultural aspects (awareness raising on social issues).
Cost of Compliance
60. It is expected that compliance with these conditions is already part of standard good workmanship and state of
the art as generally required under this Contract. The item “Compliance with Environmental Management
Conditions” in the Bill of Quantities covers these costs. No other payments will be made to the Contractor for
compliance with any request to avoid and/or mitigate an avoidable HSE impact.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
142
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Appendix 5: Example Format: HSE Report
Contract:
Period of reporting:
HSE management actions/measures:
Summarize HSE management actions/measures taken during period of reporting, including planning and
management activities (e.g. risk and impact assessments), HSE training, specific design and work measures taken, etc.
HSE incidents:
Report on any problems encountered in relation to HSE aspects, including its consequences (delays, costs) and
corrective measures taken. Include relevant incident reports.
HSE compliance:
Report on compliance with Contract HSE conditions, including any cases of non-compliance.
Changes:
Report on any changes of assumptions, conditions, measures, designs and actual works in relation to HSE aspects.
Concerns and observations:
Report on any observations, concerns raised and/or decisions taken with regard to HSE management during site
meetings and visits.
Signature (Name, Title Date):
Contractor’s Representative
Example Format: HSE Incident Notification
Provide within 24 hrs to the Supervising Engineer
Originators Reference No:
Date of Incident:
Time:
Location of incident:
Name of Person(s) involved:
Employing Company:
Type of Incident:
Description of Incident:
Where, when, what, how, who, operation in progress at the time (only factual)
Immediate Action:
Immediate remedial action and actions taken to prevent reoccurrence or escalation
Signature (Name, Title, Date):
Contractor’s Representative
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
143
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Appendix 6: Attendance at Public Consultative Meetings and Proceedings of meetings
TOWN
ABABE COMMUNITY, OBUBRA LGA: 20/09/2009
S/No
NAME
1
2
3
4
9
10
11
12
TOWN
S/NO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
CHIEF AFRO ENANG
CHIEF EGBE EGOR
CHIEF S.A ANIM
CHIEF EDOM AFONGHA
CHIEF ATI ABOR
CHIEF OBAJI OYAMA
MR FRIDAY AJKE
ALICE OKADIM
SEX
DESIGNATION
S/No
NAME
SEX
DESIGNATION
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
MRS MARY EGBE
MRS GRACE LAZAROUS
MRS VERONICA EMMANUEL JOHN
MRS AUGUSTINE GODWIN BASSEY
MRS ALICE JOHN BASSEY
MSR TITI PETER BASSEY
MRS PHILOMINA EGBE
EPKE GODWIN BASSEY
ABRAHAM EZOKE IVU
HELINA JOHN EKPE
SUNDAY NGWU
MERCY ELIAS
SIMON EKPE
BRIDGET JOHN
EMMANUEL IDETA
EMMANUEL EKPE
CAROLINE JOHN
HELINA FERDINAND
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
M
M
F
M
F
M
F
M
M
F
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITYMEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY LEADER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
WOMEN LEADER
EMINEKPON COMMUNITY, ABI LGA
NAME
SEX
DESIGNATION
CHIEF JOSEPH I.A EZOKE
M
COMMUNITY LEADER
CHIEF SIMON .E EDOKI
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
CHIEF GODWIN E. IDEBA
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MR RICHARD EMORI ENYA
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MR DAVID ELE BASSEY
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
CHIEF SIMON ELE IVU
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MR JOHN IYORI ASOR
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
CHIEF MATHEW EKWAKILI BASSEY
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MR DOMINIC EDOKI
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MR ELIAS GODWIN IJEBA
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MR DAVID ANUKWA EDOKI
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
JOHN AGULA EZOKE
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MR MOSES EKWALILI BASSEY
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MR EMMANUEL AGULA EZOKE
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MR MICHAEL EKORI
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MR MICHAEL NJOKWU
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MASTER ABRAHAM BASSEY
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MRS SUSAN EMMANUEL
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MRS ALICE JAMES
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MRS THERESA SANTUS
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MRS LUCY RICHARD EMORI
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MRS GRACE JOHN BASSEY
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MRS VIRGINA ABRAHAM
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MRS ANTHONIA AUGUSTINE
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MRS MARY TIMOTHY
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MRS ROSE MICHAEL IYORI
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MRS CARTHERINE JOHN EKORI
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MRS CORDELIA WILLIAM
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MRS ADIA JOHN ECHI
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MRS MARY EKPE ASOR
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MRS ALICE JOHN WARA
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
MRS MARY JOHN WU
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
144
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
52
TOWN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ESTHER BERNARD
S/No
NAME
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
TOWN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
MRS CHRISTIANA EKAM
EGEG OGAJI
MOKO AWUNA
ELDER OBATEM EKPA
MR IJIMAJIM EGBE
MR OKARA IJOMBO
MR CHRISTIAN OBINDIM
MR AGARA EGBARA
MR ENYAM IREK
JOHNSON OVAT
MR MOBE OVAT
MR OBAJI OMENKA
MR SUNDAY O. OKON
EMMANUEL OKON
MR OKON OKPATA
MR OJEH OCHECHE
IREK UJE
KEMPSON OFUTET
MR EGIM ODONG
MRS PATIENCE BASSSEY
CHIEF GABRIEL IBINGHA
CHIEF GABRIEL OKPA
CHIEF IGUT ENAMA
CHIEF OKOYOR OVAT
CHIEF IREKI SUNDAY
VITALIS OKPA
OJEN EWONA
ODEY ITIMA
EKEM OKPETA
JAMES ABENG
MR ODEY ANEYI
MR IBINGHAAJOGBOR
SUNDAY IGUT
AREMBANG IREK
JAMES AREMBONG
EKO EKPONG
PHILIP OKPA
GEORGE IGWE
ROBERT IGUT ENAMA
OJE HENREY
AJOGBOR AJOGBOR
JACOB EKOM
MR ODEY IREK
MR IREK OKPA
MR UKA OKEBU
F
WOMENCOMMUNITY LAEDER
ITIGIDI TOWN HALL , ABI LGA: 23/09/2003
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
CHIEF WILFRED AKANI
EVAL MICHAEL EGBONIYI
CHIEF EMMANUEL EGBONIYI
CHIEF CYPRIAN EGBONIYI
ANTHONY AZOGO
CHIEF ELOKO EGBONIYI
DAVID IGHLE INOTO
JOSEPH EPKE ARUKWU
CHIEF BENARD I. ANOR
CHRISTOPHER AGALI
CHRISTIANA WILFRED ECHI
LINUS AGBONG
ADIA ERNEST EGBE
SILAS EKWAKILI
EKPE SAMUEL BENARD
JENNY BASSEY ENYA
CHIEF CHRISTOPHER IGWE
MATHINA BASSEY ENYA
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
SEX
DESIGNATION
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
WOMEN COMMUNITY LEADER
EGBORONYI COMMUNITY, ABI LGA
M
COMMUNITY LEADER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
145
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
20
21
22
23
24
25
AGNESS JOSEPH ASOR
ABRAHAM EGBE BASSEY
PATIENCE EMMANUEL EGBONIYI
REBECA PETER ELE
WILFRED AGORBE ECHI
CARTHERINE AKANU
F
M
F
F
M
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
S/No
NAME
SEX
DESIGNATION
26
27
28
30
31
32
33
LILI DAVID ELE
MARIA ABEL
HELEN EZOKE
MARY ESE ELI
ALICE JOSEPH EWOKOR
JENNY PETER BASSEY
PRECILLIA BASSEY PETER
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY WOMEN LEADER
TOWN
S/NO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
NAME
CHIEF ENANG ELENU
MR JOHN EMORI
CHIEF MBOTOR AZRYOR
MR JOSEPH ELEMI
CHIEF JOSHUA EKOM
CHIEF ENANG ELENU
HON. IKANA ITOMO
MR VICTOR EKORO
CHIEF EBILOEKE EGBE
CHIEF JAMSE I.ENYA
CHIEF JAMES EKOKO EDU
CHIEF FRANCES EKOM
CHIEF LAWRAWS EMORI
CHIEF BENSON E.EGBAW
CHIEF EDU LAWRAWS
CHIEF WILLI ETTI EWANG
CHIEF EDWARD EKONO
CHIEF EQUALI EKEPE
MR PETER IYEME
MR FELIX I.NTEH
MR GODWIN AGBOMI
MRS CAROLINE GODWIN
MRS ROSE JOSEPH AGBOR
MRS ROSE BENSON
MRS GRACE VINCENT ENANG
STELLA AGBON
THERISER J. EMORI
28
29
30
31
32
MR SUNNY AJA
CHIEF RICHARD IMAU
IKOI DANIEL AUGUSTINE
BEATRICE TOBI
CHIEF JAMES ENYA
F
M
M
M
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
33
34
35
36
MR GODWIN E. EGWA
CHIEF FEDELIS E. EGRI
CHIEF ITUNU FRANCES
CHIEF DICKSON ESONG
M
M
M
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
S/No
NAME
SEX
DESIGNATION
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
MR ENANG IKWA
CHIEF DENIS E. ENI
MR EMMANUEL ENI
MR ENANG BENSON
MR NELSON EKON
EVAL NELSON AGBORI
MR EDU ENYA
MR ENYA AGBORI
MR POLICARP IWOM
MRS ALICE NWOSU
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
WOMEN COMMUNITY LEADER
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
ADADAMA COMMUNTY, ABI LGA
SEX
DESIGNATION
M
COMMUNITY LEADER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
146
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
TOWN
S/NO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
NAME
HRH EJE IPOULE
OGAH OGBO BENJAMIN
OFONGOR ATHOLLY
HON DOMINIC OGWELI
BLACK EBIALA
CHIEF OGAR ODEY
WANAH OGAR
CHIEF MBOM E.ODEY
DAVID OGAR
MR TOM IDAGU
OLOUHU ODEY
CYRIL OBELE
OGAR OMACHI
ODEY DOMINIC
WANAH OGAR ABE
OGAR OKO
OKO MONDAY
EVERADY ADAJI
OLUAMA UDENYI
MARY ADUMA
OGAMODE ADOGA IPOLE
CHIEF AGBAKA ODAMA
CHIEF ADIKPE IGWE
WILSON O.OLAWON
AKPATA ODEY
ODOMA OGBU
ELIZETHE UBE
IDIGBO,OKPOMA IYALA LGA
SEX
DESIGNATION
M
COMMUNITY LEADER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
WOMEN COMMUNITY LEADER
TOWN
S/NO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
NAME
BENEDICT OKEY
PHILOMENA BENEDICT
DINA ROBERT
JANE AKORY
SUNDAY OYOM
PATRICIA OYIP
FAPULOR OYIP
OKUNE PETER
CHRISTIANA BENEDICT
JOSEPH CHUKWU
OKEY EYAM
ADIA OKEY
JAMES ODEN
ALICE OYOM
ADA AJALI
MOSSES OMA
MAGRET JAMES
ODUMA JAMES
ALICE OYAMA
OKON ROBERT
MONDAY PIUS
FELIX JOSEPH
FABULOUS AKAM
MOSSES INOCENT
REGINA SOLOMON
SOLOMON OSOGU
RAYMOND PHILIP
MBENG OYOM
JOHN UTOBU
OYOM ETENG
SUNDAY TOM
MONDAY JAMES
ADUN BEACH,OBUBRA LGA
SEX
DESIGNATION
M
COMMUNITY LEADER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
F
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUN ITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
M
COMMUNITY MEMBER
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
147
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
AKOI ENANG
MARY SUNDAY
CHIEF ROBERT OKUNE
FRIDAY JAMES
RAYMOND ABRUS
FLOURENCE JAMES
CHATHERINE ROBERT
CHIEF AKAM EGBA
MONICA OYAMA
OYAMA AKMA
ROSE BENEDICT
MARY BENEDICT
GABRIEL OMORY
ADIA OKEY
FELICIA OYAMA
JAMES AGUBE
EMMANUEL OSUGU
ALICE EMMANUEL
JOHN AGBE
OYAMA MGBE
OYAMA ODEN
ADIA ODEN
ROSE JAMES
CARTHERINE OKUME
ALICE FRANCES
TINA JAMES
DINA ROBERT
ADIA GABRIEL
ADIA OKEY
ADA GABRIEL
JENNY OSHINA
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
M
F
M
M
M
F
F
M
F
M
F
F
M
F
F
M
M
F
M
M
M
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
COMMUNITY MEMBER
WOMEN COMMUNIY LEADER
148
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Appendix 7: Proceedings of meetings
Abi LGA
ITEMS
DATE
VENUE
START TIME
CLOSE TIME
OPENING
REMARKS:
DESCRIPTIONS
23/09/2009
Itigidi Town Hall, Abi, LGA
11: 00 am
12.50pm
Mr. Joseph Akpokodje , Environmental Consultant team leader gave
an introduction on what this project is all about, which is an HSBC
assisted project aimed at constructing new water treatment plants,
storage reservoirs, pipeline network, and water distribution kiosks in
various distribution points in the project communities.
He emphasized on the importance of the people of the community to
the project sustainability, which is why the public consultation meeting
is necessary. He requested for their inputs, concerns and opinion with
regard to the proposed project in their community.
REACTIONS
AND
CONCERNS
Chief Gabriel Ibingha, . said he will be very happy to see this project start
and also pledged their support during and after the commencement of the
Project
Mrs Patience Bassey complained that they have been drinking stream water
for years . and its causes different sickness to them. Mr. Oliver Nwuju ,
consultant for Earth guard assured that the recent development will help to
eradicate water related diseases.
Mr. Ekem Okpeta, a community member, asked if he can be hired as a
security for the project.
Mr Eko Ekpong, stated that, since they can pay for electricity bills, paying
for water bill will not be a strange or difficult thing for the people of the
community.
CONSULTANTS
RECOMMENDATION
Involuntary resettlement plan should be prepared to ensure smooth
implementation, in view of the houses that will be affected by the pipeline
network in the area.
CRSWBL may consider engaging the local community youths in the
temporal civil works.
Public consultation with the community should be a continuous step
through the life cycle of the project.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
149
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
ITEMS
DATE
VENUE
START TIME
CLOSE TIME
OPENING
REMARKS:
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
DESCRIPTIONS
24/09/2009
Clan Head’s Compound, in Egboronye Community, Abi LGA
10: 00 am
12.00pm
Mr. Joseph Akpokodje , Environmental Consultant team leader gave
an introduction on what this project is all about, which is an HSBC
assisted project aimed at constructing new water treatment plants,
storage reservoirs, pipeline network, and water distribution kiosks in
various distribution points in the project communities.
He emphasized on the importance of the people of the community to
the project sustainability, which is why the public consultation meeting
is necessary. He requested for their inputs, concerns and opinion with
regard to the proposed project in their community.
REACTIONS
AND
CONCERNS
Chief Benard Anor ,. Express gratitude with the project sponsors and said
they have put a lot of struggles in the past without result, to bring public
utilities including water project in the community; but none came through.
He and their entire community will be very happy to see this project fly and
also pledged their support during and after the commencement of the Project
Mr Silas Ekwakiti complained that they have been drinking stream water for
years . and its causes different sickness to them.
Mrs Christiana Wilfred talked about the past proposed water project by the
government which never saw the light of the day.
Mrs Agnes Agor, stated that, since they can pay for electricity bills, paying for
water bill will not be a strange or difficult thing for the people of the
community.
Mr Adia Egbe Akani requested for a uniform payment of water bills when the
running of the water commence.
CONSULTANTS
RECOMMENDATION
The communities are in high spirit concerning the project and are ready
through community leadership to give any assistant that will ensure project
sustainability.
CRSWBL may consider engaging the local community youths in the temporal
civil works.
Public consultation with the community should be a continuous step through
the life cycle of the project.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
150
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
ITEMS
DATE
VENUE
START TIME
CLOSE TIME
OPENING
REMARKS:
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
DESCRIPTIONS
24/09/2009
Secondary School Premises, Emin-Ekpon Community, Abi LGA
2: 00 pm
4.05pm
Mr. Joseph Akpokodje , Environmental Consultant team leader gave
an introduction on what this project is all about, which is an HSBC
assisted project aimed at constructing new water treatment plants,
storage reservoirs, pipeline network, and water distribution kiosks in
various distribution points in the project communities.
He emphasized on the importance of the people of the community to
the project sustainability, which is why the public consultation meeting
is necessary. He requested for their inputs, concerns and opinion with
regard to the proposed project in their community.
REACTIONS
AND
CONCERNS
Chief Joseph I. Ezoke ,. Express gratitude with the project sponsors and
and hopes that the it shall be fully implemented as proposed. He and their
entire community will be very happy to see this project fly and also pledged
their support during and after the commencement of the Project
Mrs Mary Egbe complained that they have been drinking stream water for
years . and its causes different sickness to them.
Mr John Iyori Asor talked about the past proposed water project by the
government which never saw the light of the day.
Dominic Edoki, stated that, since they can pay for electricity bills, paying for
water bill will not be a strange or difficult thing for the people of the
community.
Mrs Veronica Emmanuel John requested for a uniform payment of water
bills when the running of the water commence.
CONSULTANTS
RECOMMENDATION
The communities are in high spirit concerning the project and are ready
through community leadership to give any assistant that will ensure project
sustainability.
CRSWBL may consider engaging the local community youths in the
temporal civil works.
Public consultation with the community should be a continuous step
through the life cycle of the project.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
151
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Obubra LGA
ITEMS
DATE
VENUE
START TIME
CLOSE TIME
OPENING
REMARKS:
DESCRIPTIONS
24/09/2009
Clan Head’s Compound, in Ababene, Obubra LGA
10: 00 am
12.00pm
Mr. Joseph Akpokodje , Environmental Consultant team leader gave
an introduction on what this project is all about, which is an HSBC
assisted project aimed at constructing new water treatment plants,
storage reservoirs, pipeline network, and water distribution kiosks in
various distribution points in the project communities.
He emphasized on the importance of the people of the community to
the project sustainability, which is why the public consultation meeting
is necessary. He requested for their inputs, concerns and opinion with
regard to the proposed project in their community.
REACTIONS
AND
CONCERNS
Chief Afro Enong ,. Express gratitude with the project sponsors and said
they have put a lot of struggles in the past without result, to bring public
utilities including water project in the community; but none came through.
He and their entire community will be very happy to see this project fly and
also pledged their support during and after the commencement of the
Project
Mr Egbe Egor complained that they have been drinking stream water for
years . and its causes different sickness to them.
Ajakat Ovat Wilfred talked about the past proposed water project by the
government which never saw the light of the day.
Mrs Alice Okadim stated that, since they can pay for electricity bills, paying
for water bill will not be a strange or difficult thing for the people of the
community.
Mr Friday Ajake requested for a uniform payment of water bills when the
running of the water commence.
CONSULTANTS
RECOMMENDATION
The communities are in high spirit concerning the project and are ready
through community leadership to give any assistant that will ensure project
sustainability.
Public consultation with the community should be a continuous step
through the life cycle of the project.
There is need for waste management plan and compliance monitoring.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
152
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
ITEMS
DATE
VENUE
START TIME
CLOSE TIME
OPENING
REMARKS:
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
DESCRIPTIONS
19/09/2009
Chief’s Compound in Adun Beach, Obubra LGA
10: 00 am
12.30pm
Mr. Joseph Akpokodje , Environmental Consultant team leader, first
thanked the paramount ruler for his effort in ensuring that all the
communities in the area were fully represented in the meeting .
He gave an introduction on what this project is all about, which is an
HSBC assisted project to the state government aimed at constructing
new water treatment plants, storage reservoirs, pipeline network, and
water distribution kiosks in various distribution points in the project
Communities.
He emphasized on the importance of the people of the community to
the project sustainability, which is why the public consultation meeting
is necessary. He requested for their inputs, concerns and opinion with
regard to the proposed project in their community.
REACTIONS
AND
CONCERNS
Chief Friday Okata . said he will be very happy to see this project start and
also pledged their support during and after the commencement of the
Project
Mr. Ernest Awara complained that they have been drinking stream water for
years. He also stated that the available boreholes in the community are full of
salinity.
Mr.Stephen Imoke complained that his farm and building under
construction are located within the plot of land proposed for water intake
plant. He sought to know if he would be resettled for the affected items.
Mrs Philomena Okey also raised concern about her farm which incidentally
falls in the land proposed for treatment plant.
Mrs Glory Ovat requested for a uniform payment of water bills when the
running of the water commence.
CONSULTANTS
RECOMMENDATION
Involuntary resettlement plan should be prepared to ensure smooth
implementation, in view of the houses that will be affected by the pipeline
network in the area.
CRSWBL may consider engaging the local community youths in the
temporal civil works.
Public consultation with the community should be a continuous step
through the life cycle of the project.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
153
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Yala LGA
ITEMS
DATE
VENUE
START TIME
CLOSE TIME
OPENING
REMARKS:
DESCRIPTIONS
18/09/2009
Paramount Ruler’s Palace, Idigbo-Okpoma, Yala LGA
10: 00 am
12.30pm
Mr. Joseph Akpokodje , Environmental Consultant team leader, first
thanked the paramount ruler for his effort in ensuring that all the
communities in the area were fully represented in the meeting .
He gave an introduction on what this project is all about, which is an
HSBC assisted project to the state government aimed at constructing
new water treatment plants, storage reservoirs, pipeline network, and
water distribution kiosks in various distribution points in the project
communities.
He emphasized on the importance of the people of the community to
the project sustainability, which is why the public consultation meeting
is necessary. He requested for their inputs, concerns and opinion with
regard to the proposed project in their community.
REACTIONS
AND
CONCERNS
Chief Olohuode , of Okpoma . said he will be very happy to see this project
start and also pledged their support during and after the commencement of
the Project
Mr. Enang Benson complained that they have been drinking stream water
for years. He also stated that the available boreholes in the community are
full of salinity.
Mr. Linus Agbong talked about the past proposed water project by the
government which never saw the light of the day.
CONSULTANTS
RECOMMENDATION
Mr. Joshua Oton, stated that, since they can pay for electricity bills, paying
for water bill will not be a strange or difficult thing for the people of the
community.
Chief Wilfred Akani requested for a uniform payment of water bills when
the running of the water commence.
The communities are in high spirit concerning the project and are ready
through community leadership to give any assistant that will ensure project
sustainability.
CRSWBL may consider engaging the local community youths in the
temporal civil works.
Public consultation with the community should be a continuous step
through the life cycle of the project.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
154
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Appendix 8: Development of a Waste Management Plan
1.0.
Background
Liquid waste is normally discharged from base-exchange softening plants, which are
regenerated with brine. On the other hand, sludge waste is a highly concentrated suspension
of solids in liquid. Tens of thousands of tons of waste water & sludge waste are generated
annually from water treatment plants.
Best management practices are essential for sludge wastes since these materials could be
hazardous to human and environment. These practices include careful considerations of
conditions for storage and treatment of the wastes. Storage condition is especially important
in situation when immediate treatment of the wastes is not feasible.
It is the goal of every waste water/sludge waste management plan to embark upon measures
that re-use this waste whenever possible and embrace a disposal routes that shall minimize
the adverse effects, on the environment.
Waste water/Sludge Wastes Management Plan, is condition specific and takes cognizance of
the chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of the wastes and it should tell you the
following:
 Pollution potential of the sludge/wastes with respect to local environmental









2.0
conditions
Options for recovery of water from sludge
Appropriate methods for storage and required storage conditions
Competing options for stabilizing the sludge
Types of bulking agent(s) to use
How to prevent contamination of the environment by sludge leachate
Factors to consider with respect to future treatment method
Transportation planning when necessary
Appropriate treatments options
Sludge recycling options
Plans for Waste Water/Sludge Management
This plan for waste water sludge management shall be guided by the following steps:

Collect baseline data on waste water/sludge waste properties

Evaluate local regulations on sludge


Construction of sludge processing facilities
Disposal

Training Needs
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
155
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
2.1.

Interface with EMP in implementation

Recycle Options
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Baseline Assessment of Waste Water/Sludge Properties
A proper baseline assessment would need to be undertaken to gather precise information on
the sludge/wastes, generated by this water treatment plant with the purpose of analyzing the
liquid wastes and Sludge.
The following baseline data will be collected and analyzed:
 Composition types (Contained in table.1.)
 chemical
 physical
 biological
 Physiochemical quality of surface and underground water

Liquid waste
Available data indicates Liquid waste is normally discharged from base-exchange softening
plants, which are regenerated with brine. On the average about six percent (6%) of the total
throughput of the plant is discharged to waste. The main pollutants are the chlorides and
calcium and magnesium, in concentrations of about 20, 000mg L -1
Such effluents can generally be discharged into town sewers. They are difficult to treat and
where they arise in inland sites, in arid countries, care should be taken to prevent polluting
surface or underground sources.

Sludge
The basic composition of sludge at the Ikom, Ogoja and Obudu Water Supply Schemes
project sites is contained in Table.5.10. of the EMP document, where the impact assessment
and mitigation measures have been carefully undertaken to reveal that the sludge contains
chemicals such as micro-organisms, arsenics and other metals, radio nuclides, lime and
polymers, and this kind of sludge is consistent with the major portion of the effluent from a
river abstraction. The total daily volume of sludge is normally in the range of 1.5 – 5.0% of
the daily plant throughput.
2.2.
Determine Local Regulations on Waste Water/Sludge Waste
To ensure sludge management practices are as in compliance with legislation, this plan would
review relevant statutory documentation such as that of FEPA Acts 58 of 1988 and 59 of
1992, for conformity.
Also, the Federal Ministry of Environment has put in place statutory documents to aid the
monitoring, control and abatement of industrial waste that clearly state the restrictions
imposed on the release of toxic substances into the environment and the responsibilities of all
industries whose operations are likely to pollute the environment. Mitigation measures and
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
156
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
monitoring impact have given due and necessary considerations to these statutory regulations in
Table.9.3 (EMP document).

Such responsibilities include adequate treatment of effluent before being discharged into
the environment.
2.3. Construction of Sludge Storage/Processing Facility
The construction of a waste water/sludge storage processing plant (budget in appendix) will be
discussed under the following:





Waste water Treatment
Sludge water treatment
Effluent outfalls
Sewage Collection
Disposal
Waste water Treatment
For the waste water/sludge treatment plant for IItigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution
& Supply Schemes, treatment methods to be considered would include:




Activated sludge
Oxidation ditch
Bio-disc
Oxidation ponds
At this stage, from experience, no single particular method can be adopted. This is because
factors such as the composition of sewage, climate, groundwater and rainfall intensity and
pattern may well influence the type to be selected.
Sludge Treatment
Surface and ground waters undergo water treatment procedures in order to make them suitable
for human consumption. Currently in some parts of the Europe, aluminium sulphate salt (alum)
is used in a number of the Water Treatment plants for the treatment of surface and ground
waters for drinking purposes.
Treatment options used include sand filtration and or clarification with chemical coagulants and
flocculants. The sludge generated from clarification procedures vary in type and quantity
depending on the treatment methods used and the type and quality of the raw water abstracted.
Water treatment sludge are classified as a waste and therefore must be managed and disposed of
appropriately.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
157
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
2.4.
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Collection and Disposal
The handling and disposal of sludge is still a major challenge on several water treatment plants.
Mitigation of impact with attendant costs is contained in table.9.3. Of the EMP document.
Federal Environmental Protection laws are currently being reviewed in the developing countries
to curtail the erstwhile adopted practice of discharging untreated sludge back into the system
(Sonuga and Oloke 1999). However, a range of choices are available, which shall be guided by
Best Practice Environmental Options (BPEO) such as:





Direct disposal into the river
Discharge into sewer
Lagooning
Concentration and drying – use of concentration tanks and drying beds. The sludge is
discharged to secondary fill and draw settling basins. The capacity of each tank would be
about 200m3 in a 10,000m3 day -1 works.
Modern techniques – usually practiced in developing countries involve vacuum
filtration, centrifuging, freezing and filter pressing, precipitation and softening. However,
this approach is usually expensive.
Disposal method adopted shall be in line with EPAD standards.
2.5.
Training Needs
Based on assessment of institutional capacities, the EMP has identified that there is a need to
train the PIU and other agencies involved in the EMP implementation. This responsibility is
for action, by the Cross River Water Board Limited.
This plan would therefore include training needs that shall support the waste water and
sludge management plan. Course plan and corresponding costs are included in Table.9.1.
(EMP document).
2.6.
Interface with EMP
The waste water/sludge waste management issues are a component of the various activities
that have undergone assessment under the Environmental management plan (EMP) and
therefore possess an interface relationship with this plan. Implementation, Budgeting and
Responsibility considerations will also be reviewed in this regard.
2.7.
Recycle Option
The treatment and disposal of sludge will become an increasing environmental and financial
issue as sludge production continues to increase as new Waste Water Treatment, and Water
Treatment facilities are constructed and sludge quality standards become more stringent. The
preferred option for dealing with sludge would be by recycling or use of sludge, as opposed
to land-filling or incineration.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
158
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
The composting of wastewater plant sludge appears to be the best option against other ways
of elimination/disposal; this way they wouldn’t be such an economical and sanitary problem
because the sludge would be recycled.
Some techniques of recycling suppose a complex technological infrastructure, and a
considerable energetic costs, but the agricultural reuse is justifiable by many and very
important reasons; the cultivations nowadays and in this latitudes need a great amount of
nutrients and they have to be replace periodically by fertilizing, without them the mechanical,
physical and chemical properties of the soil would decrease, troubling the vegetal growth and
affecting directly in the quality and quantity of the crops; fertilizing has become a main step
in the agricultural activity and it use to be done with chemical fertilizers and with dung;
because of that there is a good chance of using the sludge as a fertilizer and at the same time
revalue this wastes.
Not all the raw materials are suitable for the process; for example, it’s better to use sludge
from urban water-treatment plants, avoiding this way contents of heavy metals and other
inappropriate products inadequate for the agricultural use. With this objective of an
agricultural use, the sludge must be processed to reduce the humidity, increase the ratio
C/N, change the physical structure and decrease the presence of pathogen micro organisms
3.0
Conclusion and Recommendations
Environmental impacts and aspects of the waste water and sludge treatment plant, reviewed
in line with the resource consumption, legal requirements and potential impact, from the
Environmental Management Plan (EMP), is significant.
Thus, for efficiency and effectiveness of environmental management best practise, we would
recommend that a waste water and sludge processing plant facility be constructed, separate
from the water processing plant, which will operate in compliance with ISO standards. This
would allow establishment of specific controls to enable implementation of these mitigation
measures, in conformity with legislation, which would be audited regularly for on-track
assessment.
Furthermore, regarding re-cycle considerations, sludge from the various components of the
sewage treatment can be digested and then dried on sludge drying beds, whereby the gas
produced by the digestion of sludge can easily be used for alternative energy sources and the
residual solid, through a proper nutrient management plan, can be integrated into
agricultural/horticultural schemes.
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
159
Itigidi, Obubra & Okpoma Water Distribution & Supply Schemes
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
.
Earthguards Limited
Earthguards Limited:
Sustainable Development Consultants
160
Download