Immunoblot analysis of short-chain enoyl-CoA hydratase

advertisement

Supplementary material

Synthesis of metabolites

Free acids (crotonic, tiglic, 3(S)-hydroxyisobutyric, 3(R)-hydroxybutyric) were converted to the corresponding acyl chlorides by reaction with thionyl chloride and then separately reacted with an aqueous alkaline solution of glycine, anaqueous alkaline solution of

13

C

2

-glycineor a solution of L-carnitine in trifluoroacetic acid to produce the corresponding acylglycines, acyl

13

C

2

-glycines or acyl-L-carnitines.

Methacrylic and acrylic acids were separately reacted with L-cysteine, 2 H

2

-DL-cysteine

(produced by reduction of

2

H

4

-DL-cystine with tris -(2-carboxyethyl) phosphine), cysteamine or

2

H

4

-cysteamine overnight at pH 7.0 at 37 o

C. Products were isolated by cation exchange chromatography on a column of Dowex 50W-X8 and eluted with 5% ammonia solution.

Fractions containing the expected products were pooled and freeze dried.

Eryththro -2-methyl-2,3-dihydroxybutyrate was prepared by reacting tiglic acid with potassium permanganate.

LC-MSMS metabolite analysis

Urine samples were filtered through 0.2

 m cellulose acetate filters and 40

L of the filtrate was mixed with 20

L of internal standard solution containing 10

 mol/L of each internal standard listed in Table 1. Samples were dried under an air stream and butylated by heating at

65 o C with 100 µL of n-butanol:acetyl chloride (9:1) for 20 minutes. After decanting and drying down the butylating reagent, samples were reconstituted in 50

L of 50% acetonitrile:water

1

and then diluted with 200

L water. A Waters Acquity TQD system fitted with an

AcquityUPLC BEH C18 1.7 µm 100 x 2.1 mm column. Solvent A was 0.1% acetic acid in water and solvent B was 90% acetonitrile:water containing 0.1% acetic acid. The column was equilibrated with 10% B and 10

L of the sample was injected after which the solvent composition was linearly increased to 60% B at 10 minutes. A flow rate of 0.4 mL/min was used throughout with a column temperature of 30 o C. Multiple reaction monitoring transitions using dwell times of 0.05 sec and conditions given in Supplementary Table 1. Propionyl

2

H

3

carnitine was used as a surrogate internal standard for 3-hydroxyisobutyryl carnitine.

Short-chain enoyl-CoA hydratase enzyme activity measurement

Short-chain enoyl-CoA hydratase (SCEH) activity was measured in fibroblast homogenates using crotonyl-CoA as substrate. Incubations were performed in 100 mM Tris pH 8.0 with

0.005 mg/mL protein at 37°C. Reactions were started with 0.5 mM crotonyl-CoA and stopped after 5 minutes with 2 M HCl to a final concentration of 0.18 M, and subsequently kept on ice for 5 minutes. Samples were neutralised with 2 M KOH plus 0.6 M MES buffer. Methanol

(HPLC grade) was added (final concentration 30% (v/v)). After a further 5 minutes on ice the samples were centrifuged for 5 minutes at 20,000 x g

, 4°C. The supernatant was subjected to ultra-high performance liquid chromatography on a C18 column (Waters Acquity HSS C18 1.8

µm 2.1x100 mm). Resolution of the different CoA-esters was achieved by a linear gradient of methanol (from 18% to 50% (v/v)) in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 5.3) at a flow rate of 0.25 mL/min under continuous monitoring at 260 nm. This procedure allowed good resolution of the substrate crotonyl-CoA and the product of the reaction, 3-hydroxybutyryl-

CoA. The amount of 3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA formed was calculated from the ratio of 3hydroxybutyryl-CoA over the total amount of substrate and product, and was used to calculate

2

enzyme activity. This method of quantification corrects for the hydrolysis of the CoA ester by thioesterases present in the homogenate.

Immunoblot analysis of short-chain enoyl-CoA hydratase

Fibroblast homogenates (50 µg) were subjected to electrophoresis on a 10% (w/v) SDSpolyacrylamide gel essentially as previously described (Laemmli, 1970) and transferred to a nitrocellulose sheet. After blocking of non-specific binding sites with 4% normal goat serum in phosphate buffered saline for 1 hour, the blot was incubated overnight at 4 o

C with rabbit polyclonal antibodies raised against bovine liver SCEH (Sigma-Aldrich) diluted 1:1000 in blocking solution. As a loading control, the membranes were re-probed with a monoclonal antibody against beta-actin (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) using a 1:10000 dilution (incubation

1 hour). Antigen-antibody complexes were visualized with IRDye 800CW goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody for SCEH and IRDye 680RD donkey anti-mouse secondary antibody for beta-actin using the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, Nebraska, USA).

Goat anti-rabbit IgG antibodies conjugated to alkaline phosphatase, diluted 1:5000 in blocking solution, were used for detection (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX).

DNA sequencing of

HIBCH and ECHS1 coding exons

Genomic DNA was isolated from skin fibroblasts by standard phenol/chloroform and ethanol precipitation methods. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–based methods were used for the molecular analysis. Exons 1 to 14 and flanking intronic regions of HIBCH , and exons 1 to 8 and flanking intronic regions of ECHS1 were amplified using primers designed by the

Exonprimer program. The relevant primers for the mutated ECHS1 exons were: exon 3 forward

3

primer 5'-TATAGGATGGGTGGGCTCTC-3', exon 3 reverse primer 5'-

GTGTATGCACAGCACGGTTC-3', exon 4 forward primer 5'-

AAGCAAGCAGAGTGATTTCTGAC-3' and exon 4 reverse primer 5'-

TGAGACACAGGCAGATTTTGAG-3'. PCR products were subjected to direct sequencing with the same primers used for amplification. The HIBCH and ECHS1 sequences were compared to the reference HIBCH and ECHS1 sequence (Ref Seq NM_014362 and

NM_004092). Two known SNPs were identified in ECHS1 of the first sibling (Exon 2: rs1049951 and Exon 5: rs2230261).

Quantitative PCR of ECHS1 mRNA

Total mRNA was isolated using the TriReagent method (Sigma-Aldrich). The Superscript II

First Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was used to generate cDNA. Real time RT-PCR was performed using the ABi7300 Real Time PCR system with

SYBRgreen PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). ECHS1 mRNA expression was detected (in triplicate) using the primer set ECHS1 exon 6 forward (5’-

GCGATGGCCAAAGAATCAGTG-3’) and ECHS1 exon 7/8 reverse (5’-

TTCCGGTCATCAGTGGCAAA-3’) (product length 107 bp). Expression was normalised to

ACTB (human beta actin) (forward 5′-AGGCACCAGGGCGTGAT-3′ and reverse 5′-

TCGCCCACATAGGAATCCTT-3′). RNA was isolated from 4 different cell pellets, each was tested at least twice ( n = 9) (each test was performed in triplicate). The results were analysed using the delta-delta comparative C t

method and presented as percent mRNA levels in normal healthy cells.

4

ECHS1 cDNA analysis

ECHS1 cDNA was analysed to determine the effect of the c.414+3G>C splicing mutation (Fig.

2C). PCR of cDNA using the primers exon 3 forward (5’-TGCAGAACCTGAGTTTCCAG-

3’) and exon 4 reverse (5’-ATTAAGATCTCCGGCTGTGC-3’).

5

Supplementary Table 1 LC-MSMS characteristics of metabolites as butyl derivatives

Analyte

3-hydroxybutyryl-carnitine

3-hydroxyisobutyryl-carnitine

S-(2-carboxyethyl) 2 H

4

-cysteamine

S-(2-carboxyethyl)cysteamine

Propionyl2 H

3

-carnitine

S-(2-carboxypropyl) 2 H

4

-cysteamine

S-(2-carboxypropyl)cysteamine

Crotonylglycine

Crotonyl 13 C

2

-glycine

S-(2-carboxyethyl)cysteine

S-(2-carboxyethyl) 2 H

2

-cysteine

Tiglylglycine

Tiglyl 13 C

2

-glycine

S-(2-carboxypropyl)cysteine

S-(2-carboxypropyl) 2 H

2

-cysteine

Transition m/z

304.2>85

304.2>85

210.2>105

Cove voltage

35

35

25

206.2>105

277.2>85

224.2>119

220.2>119

200.2>69

202.2>69

306.2>105

25

25

35

25

35

25

25

308.2>105

214.2>83

216.2>83

320.2>119

322.2>119

35

30

30

30

30

25

15

15

20

15

15

25

20

Collision energy

25

25

20

20

25

20

20

Retention time mins

5.58

5.58

6.04

6.04

6.42

6.42

6.63

6.63

2.90/3.08

2.97/3.34

3.14

3.17

3.87

3.92

3.95

6

A

B

C D

Supplementary Figure 1. MRI axial T2 images of sibling 1 at 6 days (A and B) and 2.5 months of age (C and D) showing progressive white matter loss and symmetrical changes in the putamen.

7

O O

H O S

CH

3

NH

2

S-(2-carboxypropyl)cysteine

OH

O

H O S

CH

3

NH

2

S-(2-carboxypropyl)cysteamine

H O

OH

O

O O

H O S

NH

2

S-(2-carboxyethyl)cysteine

OH

O

H O S

NH

2

S-(2-carboxye thyl)cystea mine

H

3

C

CH

3

OH erythro -2-methyl-2,3-dihydroxybutyrate

Supplementary Figure 2 Structures of the metabolites excreted in short-chain enoyl-CoA hydratase deficiency.

8

Mother Father Sibling 1 Sibling 2

Mother

GCTATGCCgt g agtgttgctgccaaga

Father

GCTATGCCgt(c+g)agtgttgctgccaaga

Sibling 1

GCTATGCCgt(c+g)agtgttgctgccaaga

Sibling 2

GCTATGCCgt(c+g)agtgttgctgccaaga

Supplementary Figure 3 Sequencing data for the exon 3 boundary of ECHS1 . The father’s

DNA sequence is the same as his children with a c.414+3G>C mutation affecting the third base of intron 3. The mother does not have this heterozygosity.

9

Supplementary Figure 4 Sequencing of the patient 193bp ECHS1 cDNA (Fig. 2C, lane 1).

Nucleotide position c.473 (arrowed) was predominantly the mutated c.473A allele with a small amount of the wild-type c.473C allele.

10

Download