Comparison of Maximum Likelihood Estimate and Least

advertisement
Comparison of Maximum Likelihood
Estimate and Least-Squares
Regression to Compute b-values for
Three Different Tectonic Regimes
Christine Gammans
What is the b-value and why do we care?
• Earthquake occurrence
per magnitude follows a
power law introduced
by Ishimoto and Iida
(1939) and Gutenberg
and Richter (1944).
• b-values are inversely
proportionate to the
differential stress on a
system (Schorlemmer et
al. 2005)
• The global b-value is ~ 1
(Stein and Wysession,
2003)
Gutenberg-Richter Relationship:
log10N= a - bM
(Gammans and Newman, 2011)
Tectonic Regimes
• Eastern United States
– Intraplate, few seismically active regions, notably New
Madrid and Eastern Tennessee
– Question as to the existence of any significant strain
field
• China
– Seismically active, intraplate region
– India’s collision with Asia produces significant strain
and, therefore, earthquake activity
• Chile
– Subduction zone
– Has produced two of the ten largest earthquakes on
record (USGS).
Eastern United States
Maximum Likelihood Estimate
Least-Squares Regression
4
4
10
Frequency of Occurrence per Magnitude
Frequency of Occurrence per Magnitude
10
3
10
2
10
1
10
0
10
0
3
10
2
10
1
10
0
1
2
3
4
Earthquake Magnitude
b-value=0.9634
5
6
10
0
1
2
3
4
Earthquake Magnitude
b-value=1.2477
5
6
Do they compare at 10,000 Bootstraps?
Maximum Likelihood
Estimate
700
Mean b-value=0.9654
Standard Deviation=0.0405
frequency of occurrence
600
500
Least-Squares Regression
400
300
Mean b-value=1.2105
Standard Deviation=0.0923
200
Chi-Squared Test
p-value=1.0233x104
χ2=555.0214
100
0
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
b-value
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
Correlation Coefficient
r=0.0003
p=0.9740
China
Maximum Likelihood Estimate
Least-Squares Regression
4
4
10
Frequency of Occurrence per Magnitude
Frequency of Occurrence per Magnitude
10
3
10
2
10
1
10
0
10
0
3
10
2
10
1
10
0
1
2
3
4
5
Earthquake Magnitude
b-value=0.9577
6
7
10
0
1
2
3
4
5
Earthquake Magnitude
b-value=1.0658
6
7
Do they Compare at 10,000 Bootstraps?
Maximum Likelihood
Estimate
700
Mean b-value=0.9577
Standard Deviation=0.0103
600
frequency of occurrence
500
Least-Squares Regression
Mean b-value=1.0715
Standard Deviation=0.0620
400
300
200
Chi-Squared Test
100
p-value=1.0233x104
χ2=150.3044
0
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
1.05
1.1
b-value
1.15
1.2
1.25
1.3
1.35
Correlation Coefficient
r=0.0039
p=0.6987
Chile
4
10
3
10
2
10
1
10
0
4
10
3
10
2
10
1
10
0
0
10
Least-Squares Regression
Frequency of Occurrence per Magnitude
Frequency of Occurrence per Magnitude
Maximum Likelihood Estimate
1
2
3
4
5
6
Earthquake Magnitude
b-value=0.8081
7
8
10
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Earthquake Magnitude
b-value=0.9769
7
8
Do they Compare at 10,000 Bootstraps?
Maximum Likelihood
Estimate
1200
Mean b-value=0.8082
Standard Deviation=0.0067
frequency of occurrence
1000
800
Least-Squares Regression
Mean b-value=0.9923
Standard Deviation=0.0810
600
400
Chi-Squared Test
200
0
0.7
p-value=1.0233x104
χ2=385.4640
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
b-value
1.2
1.3
1.4
Correlation Coefficient
r=-0.0016
p=0.8724
Conclusions
• The maximum likelihood estimate consistently
gave the most consistent distribution across
tectonic regimes and had the lowest error
associated with the distribution
• However, the least-squares method produced the
more expected values for the Eastern United
States (China and Chile are debatable)
• The most appropriate method appears to vary by
regime from this preliminary analysis, and, in the
future, the results of each method should be
analyzed before the method is finalized.
References
• Gammans, C. N. and A. V. Newman (2011), Is the Relationship Between
Modern Seismicity and Strain Fields Well Behaved in the Plate Interior?,
Seismological Research Letters, 82, 327.
• Gutenberg, B., and C. F. Richter (1944), Frequency of earthquakes in
California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 34, 185–188.
• Ishimoto, M., and K. Iida (1939), Observations of earthquakes registered
with the microseismograph constructed recently, Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst.
Univ. Tokyo, 17, 443– 478.
• Schorlemmer, D., S. Wiemer, and M. Wyss (2005), Variation in earthquake
size distribution across different stress regimes, Nature, 437, 539– 542,
doi:10.1038/nature04094.
• Stein, S., and M. Wysession (2003), An Introduction to Seismology,
Earthquakes, and Earth Structure, Blackwell, Oxford, U. K.
• United States Geological Survey (2010), Historic World Earthquakes,
Retrieved April 27, 2011 from
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/world/historical_mag.php
Download