Teacher Compensation System Often, it’s important to have some advanced warning when there is a major change in the weather. The same is true when there are major changes in education. Here are a few warnings as school districts begin to plan and implement the new Teacher Leadership System. Avoid a program that is implemented before classroom teachers are asked what they need. Avoid any program that does not have Association members and leaders as a part of the planning and implementation process. Avoid a system that creates another level of management through coaching. If the model has coaches making recommendations regarding the teaching of colleagues, and a principal is able to use those recommendations in an informal or formal evaluation, try to change the model. Coaches should simply coach by modeling, supporting, and encouraging their colleagues. Avoid a program where teacher leaders just tell other teachers how to teach and then spend the rest of their time meeting with one another. Teachers will have little or no respect for a system like this. Avoid a system that chooses all one demographic as teacher leaders. There should be a demographic mix that reflects the school population. Avoid a system that replaces teachers who assume teacher leadership roles with substitute teachers. This is bad practice and is illegal under DE rules. Avoid a program where the school administration tries to pay less than the employee’s per diem for additional time worked. Avoid a program that does not have well defined job descriptions for each teacher leadership role. Avoid a program where teachers who assume the teacher leadership roles lose some Master Contract rights. These are bargaining unit employees and have the same rights and responsibilities as any other bargaining unit member. And the Final Warning… If you are in doubt, email or call your UniServ director for advice. A bad plan could be with you for a very long time and could impact your Master Contract negatively.