Surveillance and
Broadcast Services
ASAS TN2
By: Vincent Capezzuto
Date: April 23, 2007
Federal Aviation
Administration
Agenda
• NextGen
• ADS-B
–
–
–
–
–
Background
Program Status
Program Risks
Key Upcoming Milestones
Next Steps
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Federal Aviation
Administration
2
2
Future Demands on the NAS
Flights Boeing Forecast
1.4-3X 3X
~3X
e
at
Biz shift
Note: Not to scale
R
er
Enplanement Demand
• 2% shift to micro jets
2.4X
Continue existing Biz shift
• Smaller aircraft, more airports
rm
Te
l
ina
e
Ar
t
as
ec
r
o
aF
gh
s
TAF yields
passenger growth of
1.8-2.4X in 2025
F
TA
n
tio
ate
c
er R
oje
w
r
, Lo
hP
ios
t
wt
a
o
r
th R
)G
ow
r
F
G
(TA
TAF
w
o
Gr
~2X
io
t
Ra
i
,H
th
Significant Alternate Shift
• Increase passengers per flight
• A380, reverse RJ trend
2014 and later Baseline analysis
will use OEP & FACT Capacities
1X
2004
2014
2025
20??
Time
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Federal Aviation
Administration
3
3
Realizing NextGen
Current Programs
ERAM
Key Near-Term Investments
ERAM Enhancements
Automated Problem Resolution
Concept Demonstrations
TFM-M
Trajectory-Based Ops/High Density
Infrastructure
STARS/CARTS
Robust Flow of Information
TFM-M Enhancements
Time-Based Metering
RNP/RNAV
Terminal Enhancements
NextGen
Trajectory-Based Operations
Aircraft Data Communications
Performance-Based
Operations and Services
Separation Management
Collaborative TFM
Merging and Spacing Tools
Airspace Mgmt Program
RNP/RNAV Expansion
Precision Navigation
Precise Navigation
Initial ADS-B
Initial SWIM
Data Communications
Flight Intent Downlink
ADS-B
Surveillance Services
Aircraft Separation
SWIM/Net-Enabled Weather
Net-Centric Information Sharing
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Weather Integration
Network-Centric
Information Sharing
Federal Aviation
Administration
4
4
Background: Automatic Dependent Surveillance
- Broadcast (ADS-B)
• Automatic
–
Periodically transmits information with no
pilot or operator input required
• Dependent
–
Position and velocity vector are derived
from the Global Positioning System (GPS)
or a Flight Management System (FMS)
• Surveillance –
A method of determining position of
aircraft, vehicles, or other asset
• Broadcast
–
Transmitted information available to
anyone with the appropriate receiving
equipment
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Federal Aviation
Administration
5
5
Background: Traffic Information Service - Broadcast /
Flight Information Service - Broadcast
TIS-B is a service which provides
ADS-B equipped aircraft with
position reports from secondary
surveillance radar on non-ADS-B
equipped aircraft.
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
FIS-B transmits graphical
National Weather Service
products, temporary flight
restrictions (TFRs), and special
use airspace.
Federal Aviation
Administration
6
6
Background: Initial ADS-B Services
Services:
ASAS / RFG Conversion
Surveillance Broadcast Services (en route, - Airport surface surveillance (ADS-Bterminal, surface)
APT)
- ATC surveillance in non-radar airspace
(ADS-B-NRA)
- ATC surveillance in radar areas (ADS-BRAD)
- Aircraft derived data for ground tools
(ADS-B-ADD)
Traffic / Flight Information Broadcast
Services
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Not applicable
Federal Aviation
Administration
7
7
Background: Initial ADS-B Applications
FAA Applications:
ASAS / RFG Conversion
Enhanced Visual Acquisition
- Enhanced traffic situational awareness
during flight operations (ATSA-AIRB)
Enhanced Visual Approaches
- Enhanced visual separation on
approach (ATSA-VSA)
Includes:
•Merging and Spacing
•Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (CDTI)
Assisted Visual Separation (CAVS)
• Merging and Spacing and CAVS are not
applicable
Final Approach and Runway Occupancy
Awareness
- Enhanced traffic situational awareness
on the airport surface (ATSA-SURF)
Airport Surface Situational Awareness
- Enhanced traffic situational awareness
on the airport surface (ATSA-SURF)
Conflict Detection
- Enhanced traffic situational awareness
during flight operations (ATSA-AIRB)
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Federal Aviation
Administration
8
8
Background: Program Governance
Governance
FAA Internal
Stakeholders
ATMAC RTCA
ADS-B Work
Group
International Organizations
Program
Execution
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Surveillance
and Broadcast
Services
Federal Aviation
Administration
9
9
Background: ATMAC ADS-B Workgroup
Member Affiliation:
• Federal Aviation Administration
• Air Transport Association
• Joint Planning and Development Office
Products:
• RTCA, Inc.
• Review and Validation of
Program Strategy
• Air Line Pilots Association
• Regional Airline Association
• Rockwell Collins
• Access to Aviation Community
for Avionics Cost and Benefits
Basis of Estimate
• United Parcel Service
• Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association
• National Business Aviation Association
• United States Air Force
• Backup Analysis Steering
Committee
• Avionics Minimum
Performance Requirements
• MITRE / CAASD
• The Boeing Company
• Federal Express
Link to Backup Analysis Recommendation
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Federal Aviation
Administration
10
10
International Harmonization
•
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
–
–
–
–
•
Requirements Focus Group (RFG)
–
•
Action Plan 23
European Commission
–
•
Joint RTCA / EUROCAE Working Group
Eurocontrol
–
•
Aeronautical Surveillance Panel (ASP)
Separation and Airspace Safety Panel (SASP)
Caribbean and South American Regional Planning and Implementation Group
(GREPECAS)
Asia Pacific Air Navigation Planning and Implementation Regional Group (APINPIRG)
Airborne Separation Assistance System Thematic Network 2 (ASAS –TN 2)
Recurring Coordination Meetings
–
–
Eurocontrol
Transport Canada
•
–
NAV CANADA
Civil Aviation Safety Authority
•
Airservices Australia
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Federal Aviation
Administration
11
11
Flow of ADS-B Standards
Current work based
on Package 1
Action Plan 23
Future Applications
(Package 2)
RFG Deliverables
OSEDs
SPRs
Applicant Workgroup
(proposed)
InterOps
ASA MASPS
ASA Functional Reqt’s
ADS-B & TIS-B
MASPS
STP
ASSAP
CDTI
Link MOPS
1090 MHz ES
U.A.T.
RTCA Activities
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Federal Aviation
Administration
12
12
Program Status: Objective
• Develop a multi-segment, life cycle managed,
performance based ADS-B strategy that aligns with
the Next Generation Air Transportation System
(NGATS) vision and generates value for the
National Airspace System (NAS)
– Integrate Concept of Operations for Portfolio of ADS-B
Applications
– Develop Application Life Cycle Management Approach
– Establish Infrastructure
– Continuously Monitor Value and Adjust Investments
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Federal Aviation
Administration
13
13
Program Status: Dual Track Strategy
Ground Infrastructure
2/2006 – 11/2006
11/2006 – 9/2007
1/2008 – 1/2009
4/2008 – 3/2010
Acquisition
Execution
Deploy
Ground
Infrastructure
Test Ground
Infrastructure /
Voluntary
Avionics
Equipage
Acquisition
Planning
10/2009 – 4/2010
Initial
Operating
Capability
9/2010
In-Service
Decision
2010 – 2013
Pre-NPRM
Separation
Standards
Modeling
RPR
Phase I
RPR
Phase 2
4/2006 – 9/2006
= Completed
Separation
Standards
Approval
1/2007 – 8/2007
Avionics Equipage
NPRM
9/2007
= In Process
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Ground
Infrastructure
Deployment
Avionics
Equipage
9/2009
2010 – 2020
RPR
Phase 3
Final Rule
Avionics
Equipage
Begins
10/2007 – 4/2008
11/2009
12/2009
RPR = Rulemaking Project Record; NPRM = Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Federal Aviation
Administration
14
14
Economic Analysis
Segment 1
Net Cash Flow (PV $M)
Segment 2
Net Cash Flow (PV $M)
$2,000
$500
$400
$1,500
$300
$1,000
$200
$500
($100)
($500)
($200)
($1,000)
($300)
($1,500)
($400)
($500)
($2,000)
High Confidence Results
Net Present Value ($M)
B/C Ratio
Payback Year
Internal Rate of Return
Segment 1
$158
1.3
2031
9%
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
High Confidence Results
Net Present Value ($M)
B/C Ratio
Payback Year
Internal Rate of Return
Segment 2
$168
1.1
2034
8%
Federal Aviation
Administration
15
15
2035
2034
2033
2032
2031
2030
2029
2028
2027
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
$0
2007
2035
2034
2033
2032
2031
2030
2029
2028
2027
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
$0
2007
$100
SBS Work Breakdown
Surveillance and
Broadcast Services
1.0 Program
Management
2.0 Standards and
Rulemaking
3.0 Systems
Engineering
4.0 Ops Support
•Program Management
•Rulemaking
•Analysis and Tools
•CONOPS
•Office Administration
•Advisory Circulars
•CHI
•Funding and Financial
Management
•TSOs
•Requirements
Management and
Validation
•TPMs, Schedule, EVM
•Risk Management
•Information
Management
-ASAS TN2
-ICAO APINPIRG
GREPECAS
-International Outreach
•Guidance Material
•Standards
-RTCA / RFG
-ASP
•Data Management
•Functional Architecture
•Interface Control
•Separation Standards
•System Performance
and Specification
5.0 Implementation
•Legacy Broadcast
Services
Sustainment
•Future
Requirements and
Applications
-Action Plan 23
•Airspace
Requirements
•Implementation
Monitoring and
Control
•Segment 1
Development and
Delivery
•System Test and
Evaluation
•Operational Testing
•Safety Risk
Management
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Federal Aviation
Administration
16
16
SBS Work Breakdown FY07 Funding ($M)
Standards and
Rulemaking, $4.2,
5%
Program
Management, $3.3,
4%
Systems
Engineering, $8.0,
10%
Ops Support, $6.6,
8%
Implementation,
$57.9, 73%
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Federal Aviation
Administration
17
17
Program Status: Risks (as of 4/12/07)
13 Total Risks: 4 High, 8 Medium, 1 Low
Next Risk Board: April 26, 2007
Risk Summary
Risk #7: Without proper control of the 1090 MHz spectrum, the
addition of SBS to the current environment may reduce the
performance of ADS-B and other 1090 MHz systems, reducing
benefits and system performance. (4D)
Likelihood
E
D
2
C
3
4
B
1
A
1
1
2
3
4
High Risks
Risk #1: If NAS users demonstrate active opposition to avionics
related airspace mandates, there may be delays in required
rulemaking activities and/or the program may experience a reduction
in benefits. (5C)
2
5
Risk #23: If ADS-B separation standards are not approved for
currently equivalent separation standards, then the performance
benefits of ADS-B may not be realized. (4D)
Risk #46: If FAA does not change flight plan format to accept
multiple equipment codes, automation will not be able to distinguish
between ADS-B equipped and non-equipped aircraft, and program
ISD may be delayed. (5C)
Consequence
Low
Medium
High
Source: SBS
Risk Database
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Federal Aviation
Administration
18
18
Key Upcoming Milestones
• Separation Standards Risk reduced from high to
medium: Planned August 2007
• Final JRC to Rebaseline Segments 1 and 2: Planned
September 2007
• Contract Award: Planned September 2007
• NPRM published on Federal Register: Planned
September 2007
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Federal Aviation
Administration
19
19
Next Steps
• Operational Implementation
– Performance Based System
• Avionics
• Ground infrastructure
• Pilot / Controller
– Policy
• Airport Improvement Program
• Preferred routes
– Separation Standards Development
• Demonstrate current separations standards and better
Success through program governance focused on a
collaborative FAA / industry / international
relationship
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Federal Aviation
Administration
20
20
Additional Presentations
• Roberta Massiah will be presenting on
ASAS in NextGen on April 24, 2007
• Randy Bone will be presenting on Flight
Deck Merging and Spacing on April 24, 2007
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Federal Aviation
Administration
21
21
Backup
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Federal Aviation
Administration
22
22
Segment 1 Schedule
Milestone
Projected Completion Date
Segment 1 JRC
June 2006
√
Screening Information Request (SIR) Issued
November 2006
√
Segment 2 JRC
February 2007
√
Request for Offer Released
March 2007
√
Contract Award
September 2007
NPRM Issued
September 2007
Preliminary Design Review (PDR)
November 2007
Critical Design Review (CDR)
February 2008
Key Site Initial Operating Capability (IOC) of Broadcast Services
August 2008
In-Service Decision (ISD) of Broadcast Services
November 2008
Terminal Separation Standards Approval at Louisville
June 2009
En Route Separation Standards Approval for Gulf of Mexico
July 2009
Terminal Separation Standards Approval at Philadelphia
September 2009
En Route Separation Standards Approval at Juneau
September 2009
Gulf of Mexico Comm. and Weather IOC
September 2009
Louisville IOC of Surveillance and Broadcast Services
October 2009
Final Rule Published
November 2009
Gulf of Mexico IOC of Surveillance and Broadcast Services
December 2009
Philadelphia IOC of Surveillance and Broadcast Services
February 2010
Juneau IOC of Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 2010
Surveillance and Broadcast Services ISD for ADS-B
September 2010
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Complete
Federal Aviation
Administration
23
23
Segment 2 Schedule
Milestone
Projected Dates
Segment 2 (2009 – 2014)
Implementation:
Continue Initial Aircraft to Aircraft Application Deployment
FY 2010 – FY 2014
Additional Aircraft to Aircraft Application Deployment
FY 2010 – FY 2014
Additional Aircraft to Aircraft Requirements Definition
FY 2010 – FY 2014
Continue / Complete TIS-B / FIS-B Deployment
FY 2009 – FY 2012
Continue / Complete ADS-B NAS Wide Infrastructure Deployment
FY 2010 – FY 2013
Complete 26% Avionics
FY 2014
Lifecycle:
Targeted Removal of Legacy Surveillance
FY 2016 – FY 2020
Complete 100% Avionics
FY 2020
Complete Removal of Targeted Legacy Surveillance
FY 2023
Complete Targeted Removal of TIS-B
FY 2025
Note: Segments 3 and 4 will focus on the continued definition / deployment of additional
aircraft to aircraft applications
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Federal Aviation
Administration
24
24
Backup Analysis Recommendation
• The FAA should adopt Backup Strategy 1, “Secondary Radar”
–
Retain (reduced) secondary radar network to cover required airspace,
and use primary radar to mitigate single-aircraft avionics failures
–
Requires approximately 40 terminal Secondary Surveillance Radars
(SSRs) and 150 en route SSRs be retained beyond 2020 (compared to
a total of approximately 380 today)
–
No additional equipage required for aircraft
–
This strategy is assessed as having the highest performance ranking
and lowest life cycle cost
• The FAA should revisit this assessment prior to committing to
radar investments beyond 2020
–
Changes in evaluation assumptions could significantly affect results of
this assessment
–
Investment decision for Strategy 1 required no later than FY2014
Link to ATMAC ADS-B Work Group
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Federal Aviation
Administration
25
25
Segment 2 Business Case Review: Legacy
Surveillance Costs
Legacy Case
$7,253.5
$3,934.9
$3,662.6
$272.3
$3,318.3
Total
F&E
Acquisition
Tech Refresh
O&M
SBS
Alternative
$5,377.3
$2,571.0
$2,349.8
$221.2
$2,806.3
FAA Cost
Avoidance
$1,876.2
$1,363.8
$1,312.7
$51.1
$512.3
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
Mode-S Replacement (Legacy Case: 144 systems; SBS Alt: 67
Systems)
BI-4/5 Replacement (Legacy Case: 32 systems; SBS Alt: N/A)
BI-6 Replacement (Legacy Case: 123 systems; SBS Alt: 123 systems)
ASR-11 SSR Replacement (Legacy Case: 66 systems; SBS Alt:
N/A)
ASDE-3 Replacement (Legacy Case: 36 systems; SBS Alt: N/A)
ASDE-X SMR Replacement (Legacy Case: 19 systems; SBS Alt: N/A)
Link to ATMAC ADS-B Work Group
Surveillance and Broadcast Services
April 23, 2007
Federal Aviation
Administration
26
26