Reid K. Hester, Ph.D. Director, Research Division Behavior Therapy Associates, LLC www.behaviortherapy.com reidhester@behaviortherapy.com Tel. 505.345.6100 ASAM Disclosure of Relevant Financial Relationships Content of Activity: 2013 State of the Art Course in Addiction Medicine Name Commercial Interests Reid K Hester, DCU Ph.D. Relevant Financial Relationships: What Was Received Owns copyright CDCU Owns copyright, patent pend. ModerateDrinking app Owns copyright Overcoming Addictions app Owns copyright Checkup & Choices app Owns copyright, patent pending Relevant Financial Relationships: For What Role No Relevant Financial Relationships with Any Commercial Interests NIAAA for funding Research staff (RAs, T. Haney, H. Delaney, Bo & Bill Miller, consultants) Study participants Problem drinkers: The big picture Stages of Change & matched interventions Stepped care: only as much as needed BMIs Action-oriented protocols Management issues Consumption & alcohol related problems None Mild Moderate Consumption Substantial Severe Severe Substantial Mild None Moderate Alcohol Problems IOM, 1990 Brief intervention, moderation training Abstinence focused treatment Threshold for action Severe Substantial Moderate Mild None Alcohol Problems Relapse Permanent exit Maintenance Precontemplation Contemplation (Should I change my drinking?) [DCU/CDCU] Action (How do I change my drinking?) [MD.com/OA] Preparation (Goals, What Would it look like? [DCU/CDCU] Using the minimal amount of intervention needed to resolve problems (Sobell & Sobell, 2000). Screening (1 question) BMIs Action-oriented protocols Moderation programs Abstinence programs Screen as integral part of lifestyle assessment Consider drinking from health standpoint, not disease standpoint Assess extent of drinking & for heavy drinkers answer question, “Should I change my drinking?” BMIs The Drinker’s Check-up (25+ y/o) The College Drinker’s Check-up (<25 y/o) Web version www.drinkerscheckup.com Randomized clinical trial: moderate drinking outcomes far more common than abstinence (10%) (Hester et al., 2005). 200 150 100 50 0 Immediate Delayed Baseline 4 weeks 8 weeks 12 mo 193.9 102.8 150.8 108.4 115 66.7 75 Cut back or abstain Natural recovery literature (Sobell et al.) Most people w/alcohol problems reduce their drinking w/o any professional or self-help Tend to be the less dependent drinkers Relationship of hx. alcohol problems & success in reducing alcohol problems w/moderation (Miller et al., 1992) Prevalence is increasing (NIAAA, 2004) Tend to not seek abstinence-oriented treatment. Constitute the majority of those who recover w/o formal treatment (i.e. natural recovery) At same time they have long histories of alcoholrelated problems. Outcome summary from Hester & Miller (2003) www.behaviortherapy.com/whatworks.htm More controlled clinical trials of BSCT than any other treatment until recently Variety of ways to provide the tx. (face-to-face, bibliotherapy, web app.) 2-3 Std drinks for men, 1-2 for women 3-4 days/wk Peak BACs <.055 Maximum limits 3/7 day/week women, 4/14 day/week men (<65 y/o) Moderation Management (www.moderation.org) Moderation training protocols (e.g., www.moderatedrinking.com) 80 heavy drinkers randomly assigned to: a) MD + MM or b) MM alone Follow-ups at 3, 6, & 12 mo. 73% had outcome data at all 3 f-up points Group MD +MM MM only Age 48.7 52.1 Education in Years 15.7 15.1 MAST score 14.1 13.2 Drinks (SECs)/Week 33.0 35.4 Percent Days Abstinent (PDA) 16.3 16.2 Mean Drinks per Drinking Day 5.5 6.1 Group MD +MM MM only Mean Peak BAC per Drinking Day 111mg% 119mg% Hours BAC > 80 mg% 21.9 26.1 DrInC Recent Total score 24.3 21.3 AUDIT score 17.7 18.3 (in prior week, descending curve) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 Baseline 3 Mo F-up MD + MM 6 Mo F-up MM only 12 Mo F-up 50 40 30 20 10 0 Baseline 3 Mo F-up MD + MM 6 Mo F-up MM only 12 Mo F-up 30 20 10 0 Baseline 3 Mo F-up MD + MM 6 Mo F-up MM only 12 Mo F-up AUDIT score over 8 MAST score under 20 Medical hx to screen for contraindications Clients with less severe alcohol-related problems Clients who refuse abstinence without first trying moderation Moderation achievable by many, but not all Predictors of success not perfect Lack of success by 6-8 weeks not good sign for chances of long term success in moderation Share info about likelihood of success with moderating drinking (Miller, et al., 1992) Discourage abstinent alcoholics from trying moderation Urge "vacation" from drinking Agree to moderation trial w/contract to abstain if unsuccessful Most significantly dependent clients won't opt for moderation, especially once it is explained to them Clients will always choose their own goal (see Sanchez-Craig's BSCT study w/abstinence & moderation gps) Overcoming Addictions, A SMART Recovery web application (www.overcomingaddictions.net) A 4-step, CB-T & MET protocol Build, maintain motivation Dealing w/urges, cravings Managing thoughts, feelings, actions Lifestyle balance for relapse prevention www.smartrecovery.org 1,000+ face-to-face meetings 30 Online meetings/week Forum for support Manuals, etc. on their web site Baseline characteristics Variable Overall Group SR SR + OA OA (n = 86) (n = 83) (n = 19) Female n (%) 114 (60.6%) 52 (61%) 50 (60%) 12 (63%) Age M (SD) 44.3 (10.9) 43.4 (10.6) 44.6 (11.1) 48.3 (8.4) 170 (90.4%) 76 (88.4%) 77 (92.8%) 17 (89.5%) Hispanic 5 (2.7%) 3 (3.5%) 1 (1.2%) 1 (5.3%) Other 7 (6.9%) 7 (8.1%) 5 (6.0%) 1 (5.3%) Ethnicity n (%) White Education M (SD) 16.1 (2.4) 15.93 (2.5) 16.0 (2.3) 17.3 (2.1) AUDIT M (SD)a 24.7 (8.1) 24.8 (8.1) 23.95 (8.2) 27.4 (7.2) BSI M (SD)b 17.4 (12.9) 19.35 (12.5) 15.95 (13.6) 14.8 (11.0) InDUC M (SD)c 41.4 (17.9) 42.2 (19.0) 40.6 (17.5) 40.8 (15.6) 85 75 65 OA only 55 OA + SR SR only 45 35 OA only OA + SR SR only Baseline 36.46 46.63 41.72 3 months 59.24 82.47 71.5 6 months 54 77.2 74.48 10 9 8 7 6 5 OA only 4 OA + SR 3 SR only 2 1 0 OA only OA + SR SR only Baseline 8.7 6.8 8.6 3 months 4.7 3.6 4.7 6 months 6.2 4.2 3.8 40 30 20 OA only OA + SR SR only 10 0 OA only OA + SR SR only Baseline 40.8 35.4 41.2 3 months 19.5 17.8 18.6 6 months 22.1 15.4 17.8 Our newest web app integrates: DCU, CDCU, MD, & OA Designed for use with patients in primary care Screens for heavy drinking, drug use Provides BMI Segues to MD & OA For many problem drinkers, BMI is sufficient Some will benefit from moderation protocols, some will need abstinence-oriented protocols Brief follow-ups key to knowing how much has been enough Hester, R.K., Delaney, H.D., & Campbell, W. (2012). The College Drinker’s Check-up: Outcomes of two randomized clinical trials of a computer-based brief motivational intervention. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, Hester, R.K., Delaney, H.D., & Campbell, W., (2011). Moderatedrinking.com and Moderation Management: 12-month outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 215-224. Abstract at http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2011-03047-001 Hester, R.K., Delaney, H.D., Campbell, W., & Handmaker, N.(2009). A web application for moderation training: Initial results of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 37(3), 266-276. Hester, R.K., Lenberg, K.L., Campbell, W., & Delaney, H.D.D. (2013). Overcoming Addictions, a web-based application, and SMART Recovery, an online and in-person mutual help group for problem drinkers Part 1: Three-Month Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(7):e134. Hester, R.K., Squires, D.D., & Delaney, H.D. (2005). The Computerbased Drinker’s Check-up: 12 month outcomes of a controlled clinical trial with problem drinkers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 28(2), 159-169. Miller, W. R., Leckman, A. L., Delaney, H. D., & Tinkcom, M. (1992). Long-term follow-up of behavioral self-control training. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 53, 249-261. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. (2004a). Alcohol abuse increases, dependence declines across decade. www.niaaa.nih.gov/press/2004/NESARCNews.htm Sobell, M. B., & Sobell, L. C. (2000). Stepped care as a heuristic approach to the treatment of alcohol problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 573–579.