PSERC Aging Workforce: Maintaining the Engineering Expertise Needed to Keep the Grid Reliable Dennis Ray, Ph.D. Executive Director Power Systems Engineering Research Center NERC Long-Term Reliability Assessment Workshop August 16, 2007 Background • Power Systems Engineering Research Center (PSERC - http://www.pserc.org) • Mission: “Empowering minds to engineer the future electric energy system” • 13 university consortium collaborating with industry (about 35 members) conducting research in power markets, power systems and T&D technologies • Research: 40 researchers, 60 graduate students, 20 projects • Students: 450 undergraduates, 140 masters, 120 doctorate PSERC 2 Background • IEEE Power Engineering Society (PES – http://www.ieee.org/power/) • Worldwide, non-profit association of more than 23,000 professionals engaged in electric power engineering • Provides world’s largest forum for sharing the technological developments for developing standards for educating industry members and the public • Formed Workforce Team to address aging workforce issues PSERC 3 The Aging Power Industry Workforce 700 Number of Employees 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 18-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 65+ Employee Age Group Now 5 years out 10 years out Source: Ray, Dennis and Bill Snyder. "Strategies to Address the Problem of Exiting Expertise in the Electric Power Industry." Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. January 2006. PSERC 4 The reliability of the North American electric utility grid is dependent on the accumulated experience and technical expertise of those who design and operate the system. As the rapidly aging workforce leaves the industry over the next five to ten years, the challenge to the electric utility industry will be to fill this void… 2006 Long-Term Reliability Assessment NERC PSERC 5 Response Strategies • • • • • • • • • PSERC Expanding the “pipeline” of new hires Recruiting and retention Improving image of power careers Workforce planning and job design System automation Knowledge retention Rehiring retirees Outsourcing Public policy barriers 6 Our industry is coming to the realization that recruiting and retaining the best people is top priority. Wanda Reder, President-Elect, IEEE PES, VP, S&C Electric, in “Meeting the Twin Challenges of Education and an Aging Workforce in the Electric Power Industry.” The CIP Report. Nov. 2006. PSERC 7 Expanding the Educational Pipeline • Students: Encourage interest in power-related careers and overcome access barriers • Infrastructure: Build a sustainable educational infrastructure to educate students to meet the requirements of power-related careers • Analysis: Engage in collaborative thinking about the most productive and cost-efficient ways to build the education pipeline. PSERC 8 Students • Undergraduate student interest in engineering not growing as fast as total number of undergraduates • Diversity in engineering remains an issue (reference U.S. population figures in 2004: 38.3% people of color, 48.5% female) 40 35 30 Engineering at Universities Engr Students of Color Females in Engineering 25 Percent 20 15 10 5 0 1995 PSERC 2000 2004 Source: Women, Minorities and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering, National Science Foundation, 2007 9 Power Engineering Student Trends 2005/6 vs. 2001/2 Academic Year • Undergraduate enrollments in elective power classes declined from about 3,500 to 3,300. • Masters: down from 1,600 to 1,400 • Doctorate: rose from 800 to 900. • International students are now about 59% of all graduate students. • Growing interest in “energy systems” PSERC Source: IEEE Power Engineering Education Committee Survey Results for 2005-06 Academic Year. 10 Declining EE Undergraduate Enrollments (Univ. of Wisc.) PSERC 11 DOE Recommendations • Foster math and science education • Build interest in energy-related careers • Notes: • Wide-ranging state and national programs are addressing those objectives. • Links to power careers are likely improvable. • Where would it be most helpful for the electric power industry to get more involved? Workforce Trends in the Electric Utility Industry, U.S. DOE, August 2006. PSERC 12 Middle School Education Materials Lesson materials and Web applets from TCIP Project (http://www.mste.uiuc.edu/projects/tcip/) PSERC 13 Power Engineering Image • When you think of power engineering, what comes to mind? • • • • • • Exciting (58%) Critical to society (55%) Lots of opportunities (51%) Future minded (43%) Relevant (40%) Boring (2%) • What image is the electric power industry communicating today? Should it change? Source: IEEE PES International Survey of Power Engineering Students (June 2007) PSERC 14 Career-Choice Decision Factors • What made you decide on your career path? • Interesting career (67%) • Opportunity to help solve significant societal challenges (38%) • Make the world a better place to live (33%) • Good pay opportunities (30%) • High likelihood of getting a job (20%) • What can be done to make recruiting and retention efforts more effective? Source: IEEE PES International Survey of Power Engineering Students (June 2007) PSERC 15 Influential People in Career Choices • Who influenced your career choice? • • • • • Guidance counselor/mentor/teacher (26%) Talking with people in the industry (22%) Parent’s suggestions (12%) Friend’s suggestions (6%) Media (2%) • How we better target our recruiting efforts on the key influencers of career choices? Source: IEEE PES International Survey of Power Engineering Students (June 2007) PSERC 16 PES-Careers • IEEE PES’ upcoming on-line job opportunities service uniquely designed for power engineering students (http://PES-Careers.org) • As a service to U.S. and Canadian students and their future employers • To help address emerging engineering workforce challenges • To facilitate collaboration among industry, government and academia to provide a quality education for the next generation of power engineers. • Anticipated to go-live in late August • Developed with PSERC’s assistance PSERC 17 Education System Infrastructure • Institutions • Universities • Engineering Technology Schools (community colleges, etc.) • Other providers (consultants, etc.) • Outcomes • Degrees (associate, bachelors, etc.) • Professional Development (CEU’s, etc.) • Venue (in-residence, on-site, distance education, etc.) PSERC 18 Educational Infrastructure • What needs are best met by each education model? • What changes in the education system should be made to better prepare the workforce? • What types of industry-governmenteducation partnerships are needed to build and sustain the infrastructure? • What are best practices today? What types are working well in other industries? PSERC 19 Without strong support for strategic research in power systems engineering and without qualified replacements for retiring faculty, the strength of our Nation’s university-based power engineering programs will wane, and along with them, the foundation for innovation in the power sector to meet our energy challenges in the 21st century. Workforce Trends in the Electric Utility Industry, U.S. DOE, August 2006. PSERC 20 Power Engineering Program Trends • New (untenured) faculty declined from 21% in early 90s to 14% of total faculty. • Senior faculty rose from 50% to 63%. • Approximately 3 faculty members are hired for every 4 that leave. • Reported total research funding per institution declined about 18%. • Industry-funded research rose compared to 2001-02, but did not off-set declines in government-funded research. PSERC Source: IEEE Power Engineering Education Committee Survey Results for Various Academic Years. 21 University Power Systems Programs • Of 48 programs reporting in both 1987/8 and 2005/6, 50% declined and 15% grew in number of major faculty members. Power Engineering Faculty Number of Faculty Power Faculty at Ohio State 14 Carnegie Mellon University: 1975: 8 faculty; 2007: 1 12 10 Cornell University: 1975: 7 faculty; 2007: 1 8 6 University of Michigan: 1971: 5 faculty; 2007: 0 4 2 0 1960 UC Berkeley: 1971: 4 faculty; 2007: 1 1970 1980 1990 2000 Academic Year PSERC 2010 Univ. of Missouri-Columbia: 1975: 8 faculty; 2007: 0 Source: IEEE Power Engineering Education Committee Survey Results for Various Academic Years. 22 Without a sizable research portfolio, it is not possible for a disciplinary area such as electric power to get new faculty positions or resources. Professor Vijay Vittal, Director, Power Systems Engineering Research Center in filed comments to FERC in RM06-16, July 2006. PSERC 23 University administrations need to know there is a long term commitment to university research in the area. The students need to know there are high paying, interesting jobs. Professor Robert J. Thomas, Cornell University, in “Meeting the Twin Challenges of Education and an Aging Workforce in the Electric Power Industry.” The CIP Report. Nov. 2006 PSERC 24 Funding Research • What barriers need to be overcome to increase support from industry and government? • Can funding from such initiatives as the America Competes Act be leveraged? • Could industry advocate for increased university research support from Congress, DOE, NSF, etc.? PSERC 25 Analysis • Need to increase understanding of aging workforce challenges, and to facilitate discussions to find effective, collaborative responses to those challenges • Responses need to address how to increase the number well-trained students, and how to build and sustain the infrastructure necessary to educate them • Questions posed earlier, among others, should be addressed. PSERC 26 NSF Workshop on Sustaining Power Engineering Programs • Objectives of this invited attendance workshop for industry, government and academia: • To assess the gap between the need for new engineers and the ability of universities to meet that need • To understand what it takes to sustain university programs and explore options for doing so • To facilitate an executive summit on the second day to discuss education infrastructure needs and options • To develop an action plan for addressing key issues • Nov. 29-30, 2007 in Arlington, VA • Collaborative effort of IEEE PES and PSERC PSERC 27 Conclusions • Decisions on investments in people should receive as high a priority in maintaining reliability as decisions on investments in the aging physical infrastructure. • Collaboration among industry, government, and universities is needed to respond to the aging workforce challenges. • Research support for universities is fundamental to educating the next generation of power engineers. PSERC 28