Name/Block/Date Handed In:
1
Level 3 Design Project: The World of Work - How Will I Get There?
Criterion D: Evaluating
Rubric
Achievement
Level
Level
Descriptor
0
The student does not reach a standard described by any of
the descriptors below.
The student:
i.
describes a testing method, which is used to
measure the success of the solution.
ii.
states the success of the solution.
The student:
i.
describes a relevant testing method, which
generates data, to measure the success of the
solution.
ii.
outlines the success of the solution against the
design specification based on relevant product
testing.
iii.
lists the ways in which the solution could be
improved.
iv.
outlines the impact of the solution on the
client/target audience.
The student:
i.
defines relevant testing methods, which
generate data, to measure the success of the
solution.
ii.
describes the success of the solution against the
design specification based on relevant product
testing.
iii.
outlines how the solution could be improved.
iv.
describes the impact of the solution on the
client/target audience, with guidance.
The student:
i.
describes detailed and relevant testing methods,
which generate accurate data, to measure the
success of the solution.
ii.
explains the success of the solution against the
design specification based on authentic product
testing.
iii.
describes how the solution could be improved.
iv.
describes the impact of the solution on the
client/target audience.
1-2
3-4
5-6
7-8
Exploring Career Decisions
Descriptor
None of the descriptors below are attempted
or not enough evidence is observable.
Some of the requirements for the essay and
paragraphs are met.
Most of the requirements for the essay and
paragraphs are met.
Each essay and paragraph follows minimum
length specifications and explains details that
are required, according to the specifics asked
in each question
Each essay and paragraph is creative, more
than follows minimum length specifications
and thoroughly explains, discusses, analyzes,
evaluates, and reflects with details that are
required, according to the specifics asked in
each question.
Criterion D Objectives
 I can describe detailed and relevant testing methods, which generate accurate data, to measure the
success of the solution.
 I can explain the success of the solution against the design specification.
 I can describe how the solution could be improved.
 I can describe the impact of the solution on the client/target audience.
Evidence of Work
Name/Block/Date Handed In:
2
Classwork and Homework
Directions: You need to evaluate two things: (1) how your product turned out and (2) how you felt about your use of the IB
Design Cycle (by specifying each individual criterion – A, B, C, and D).
Step 1 – Reflect, analyze, and evaluate the product/solution.
1. In an essay of ½ page or longer, reflect, analyze, and evaluate how your product turned out. What are its strengths? What did you
do best? What are its OFI’s (opportunities for improvement or what would you improve on)? Compare your product to the
tests/checklists you created in Criteria A and B and to the plan you created in Criterion C. Consider whether your product is successful
based on the checklist. For example, consider its pros and cons based on each item on your checklist and how they were applied or
modified for your product. Also, analyze both your own views on its outcome and the views of the intended user (your audience). Cite
specifics; please do not just write general comments like “good,” “okay,” “bad,” “better,” etc.
Step 2 – Reflect, analyze, and evaluate the use of the design cycle, by each individual criterion (A, B, C, and D).
2. In a paragraph of five or more sentences, reflect, analyze, and evaluate your use of Criterion A: Inquiring and analyzing - of the
design cycle. Did you thoroughly detail both yours and teachers expectations? How do you feel about your time, effort, and work of
finding, collecting, and analyzing your research? How did you know that your sources were valid and reliable? What are your
strengths for Criterion A? What did you do best? What are your OFI’s (opportunities for improvement)? What would you do
differently if you had to do it over?
3. In a paragraph of five or more sentences, reflect, analyze, and evaluate your use of Criterion B: Developing ideas - of the design
cycle. How do you feel about your chart (checklist), comparison, and analysis of your selected three items or products? Did your
diagram/outline give you a preview of what your multimedia or web design presentation may look like? What are your strong points
with Criterion B? What did you did you like the best? What would you do differently if you had to do it over?
4. In a paragraph of five or more sentences, reflect, analyze, and evaluate your use of Criterion C: Creating the solution - of the
design cycle. How do you feel about your time, effort, and work that you invested with completing your plan for your multimedia or
web design presentation? What are its strengths? What did you do best? What are its OFI’s (opportunities for improvement or what
would you improve on)? In Step 1, Question one of this Criterion D Evidence of Work document, you evaluated your movie or web
design presentation. What would you do differently if you had to do your presentation over?
5. In a paragraph of five or more sentences, reflect, analyze, and evaluate your use of Criterion D: Evaluating - of the design cycle.
Of course, it’s the criterion of the design cycle that you are completing now. Refer to the rubric for Criterion D at the beginning of this
document. Reflect on your essay (#1) about evaluating your product. Also, reflect on these four paragraphs (numbers 2-5) about your
evaluation of your use of criteria A, B, C, and now, D.? How was Criterion D different from criteria A, B, and C? What are your
suggestions for improvement for Criterion D?
.