Brief about
A C Joshi Library
Panjab University
Chandigarh , India
by
Dr. Raj Kumar
University Librarian
A C Joshi Library
Panjab University, Chandigarh
Presentation Overview


Introduction about A C Joshi Library
Overview of E-Resources
.


RFID Technology implemented in the A C Joshi Library
N-LIST Programme
About Library
•The Panjab University Library, named officially
as "A. C. Joshi Library", after the name of an
illustrious Vice-Chancellor of this University, was
established in the U.S. Club, Shimla in the year
1947 after the Partition of the country.
•The Panjab University started shifting its offices
to Chandigarh, the new Capital of Punjab, in
1955-56.
•Foundation stone of new Library building in
Chandigarh was laid in 1958 by Dr. S
RadhaKrishnan the then Vice-President of India
The Library in its new premises was formally
inaugurated in 23 October 1963 by Pt. Jawaharlal
Nehru, the then Prime Minister of India.
Library Building
•The five storied centrally airconditioned impressive Library
building in red stone and concrete
is a modular structure based on
modern principles of architecture.
•All the reading areas face the
North, the Staff Area is on the
South side, with the Stack Area
being in between
•Its two main Reading Halls facing
the Shivalik Hills afford a
panoramic view of nature.
•Total carpet area of Library is
1,22075 Sq. Ft. with a seating
capacity of 600.
LIBRARY SECTIONS
Rare Books/
Special
Section
Digital Library
Thesis & Text
Book Section
A C JOSHI LIBRARY
Binding Section
Circulation
Section
Reference
Section
Computer
Section
Technical
Section
PU Chandigarh
Acquisition
Section
Transfer
Section
Periodicals
Section
Features of A C Joshi Library
•A C Joshi Library is considered to be one of the best libraries of India
and has been recognised as one of the 6 Document Delivery Centers
for data-information-distribution under the UGC-INFLIBNET programme.
•Modern library with automation of its routines and services. High-speed
servers, scanner, printer and multimedia computers form its IT
infrastructure.
•Large collection of resources in print, CD-ROM and Online format.
•Close Circuit Camera System (CCTV) at the entrance, reading and
stack areas.
•The Library remains open from 8:00 AM-10:00 PM on all days of the
week for 362 days barring 3 national holidays.
•An Outer Reading Hall for studying personal books remains open 24
hrs.
•Modern well equipped Bindery
Library Total Collection
Total Collection:
7 Lakhs
Back Volumes Journals –
1.24 Lakhs
Thesis-
8000
Manuscripts-
1493
Journals Subscribed (Print)-
600
Access to Online Journals-
5000
(through UGC-INFONET and INDEST Consortium)
Electronic Resources@PU Library
•UGC INFONET Journals
•INDEST journals
•Science Direct
•Web of Science
•JCCC@UGC-INFONET E-Journal Gateway
•SCOPUS Online Database
•WESTLAW Online Database
•Wiley Online Books
•Proquest Dissertations and Thesis Database
•Sage Online Journals
JCCC@UGC-INFONET
J-Gate Custom Content for Consortium (JCCC) is a Virtual Library of
Journal Literature.
 It acts as a one point access to journals subscribed currently under
UGC INFONET and university libraries designated as Inter Library
Loan (ILL) Centers.

JCCC has facility to trigger e-mail request for article to Inter Library
Loan Centers.
Inter Library Loan (ILL) Centers:
 INFLIBNET has identified 22 potential universities (including Panjab
University) as ILL Centers.
 ILL centers fulfill ILL request from the users affiliated to universities
covered under UGC- INFONET Digital Library Consortium.

Some of the prominent ILL centers are University of Delhi, Jawaharlal
Nehru University, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, and University
Grants Commission

Radio Frequency Identification
(RFID)
Components:
•Patron Self- Checkout
•Security Gates
•Book Drop
•Digital Library Assistant
 New
vistas
to
preserve
scholarly output in higher
education system: Institutional
Repositories
Institutional Repository

Digital preservation of the scholarly content is a foremost problem
facing by the libraries now-a-days. Academic institutional repositories
are the organized collection of digital contents. Digital content
confronts with many intimidation including technological obsolescence
and the worsening of digital storage media. In this genus of situation,
the current expansions of IRs propose some assurance in the long
term preservation of digital information. An IR is a service that a
research organization offers to its community for the management and
dissemination of research materials created by the community
members.
Need of Institutional Repositories

The need to create an IR has been prompted by the reasons such as:
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Scholarly communication
Storing learning materials and courseware
Electronic publishing
Managing collections of research documents
Preserving digital materials for the long term
Added prestige to an institution to showcase its academic
research
Institutional leadership role for the Library Knowledge
management
Research assessment
Encouraging open access to scholarly research
Housing digitized collections
Essential Elements of Institutional Repository

Institutional Repository can be any collection of digital material
hosted, owned or controlled and disseminate by any institution
irrespective of purpose of provenance. IR can assume many
forms and serve a variety of purposes as per the functions and
objectives of parent institution. A digital archive of the
intellectual product by the faculty, research staff and students/
research scholar of an institution and it should be accessible to
end user without boundaries (with in and out of the institution).
The content of an Institutional Repository could be:
Institutionally defined:

IRs represent historical, tangible and embodiment of the intellectual life
and output of an institution. It capture the original research and other
intellectual property that is output of institution’s constituent population
active in various field of knowledge. The institution needs to be
checked the primary quality of the scholarly publication as the
repository will be one of the significant indicator of the institution’s
academic quality. Therefore, it is essential for the institutions to define
it properly.
Scholarly contents:

The content may be include in an IR are pre prints, pre-reviewed
articles, monographs enduring teaching materials, data-sets,
conference papers, electronic thesis and dissertation, gray literature
and other work in progress. Further, it depends on the goals
established by each institution. The institutional repositories could
contain any work product generated by the institutions population,
which includes students, faculty, non-faculty, researcher and others.
Appropriate policies and mechanism are required to control and
manage the accession of the contents of institutional
repositories. The detailed workflows in respect of who can
contribute, approve, access and update the digital content
making available by the institutional communities and interests
groups.
Cumulative and perpetual:

The role of IRs become important that the
contents collected would be both cumulative
and maintained in perpetuity.
Interoperability and Open Access:

To provide access to research community
who belongs to outside institution’s, the IR
systems must be able to support
interoperability in order to provide access via
multiple search engines and other discovery
tools.
Content, Uses and Issues of
Institutional Repositories

Mark Ware in his presentation titled
“Institutional repositories — the state of play”
at the PALS Conference (24 June 2004) has
identified the IR content, IR uses and IR
issues as below:
IR Content

USES
ISSUES
Pre-prints
Scholarly communication
Sound Policy
Post-prints
E-publishing
Persuading faculty to participate
Author post-prints
Author recognition
Rights
management
Publisher PDFs
Education
Organizational and
administrative
Technical reports
Collection management
Funding / business
model
Working Papers
Long-term preservation
Long-term
preservation
















IR Content


USES
Theses & dissertations
Books or chapters of books
Institutional prestige
Research assessment
Research databases
Knowledge management






Conference proceedings
Text
ISSUES
Accession policies
Open access or
Access Control
Central vs
institutional
repositories
Metadata
Technological








Audio/ Video recordings
Teaching materials
Digital research materials,
e.g. simulations, code
Unpublished work
Data sets
Research papers
Working papers
Stakeholders and their benefits

The stakeholders for the IRs identified are the individuals,
institutions and the research community at large. The IRs
are a platform for the individuals to archive their research
work to dissemination and to have a great impact. The
institutions can attract high quality faculty, students and
funding for its research activities. The IRs are a means of
increasing visibility and prestige for universities and
research organizations. The research community will be
able to access the world’s research available in different
IRs, which ensure long-term preservation of institute’s
academic output. The IRs can effectively facilitate faster
communication process and also avoid unnecessary
duplication.
Institutional Repository Software


A variety of software to create an institutional repository has
been used by the Institutions as per their choice, ease of use
and based on technology. The software to create an IR may be
supported in various ways, like locally supported, centrally
supported or commercial support.
The challenges in setting up an IR are now seen as being less
to do with technology and more to do with managerial,
organizational and cultural issues as leading software
packages such as DSpace and EPrints are both available free
under open source licenses, and there are at least half a dozen
other possible packages. The commercial document
management or knowledge management software packages
for setting up an IR are also suitable but could not take off for
adoption due to their costs.
DSpace (http://www.dspace.org)


software has been designed as a result of collaboration
between Hewlett Packard and MIT to offer IR services. It
manages diverse heterogeneous types of digital content and
offers interoperability via OAI-MHP (Open Archive Initiative –
Metadata Harvesting Protocol – a software standard that allows
specialised search engines to gather article metadata from
compliant websites) and built-in support for Dublin Core
metadata.
A groundbreaking digital repository system, DSpace captures,
stores, indexes, preserves and redistributes an organization's
research material in digital formats. Interoperability between
systems is built-in and it adheres to international standards for
metadata formats. DSpace supports different file formats.
EPrints
(http://www.eprints.org)

package is more oriented towards e-print archives, as the name
suggests. It is also OAI-MHP compliant. It does not directly
support persistent identifiers (though presumably it does not
rule them out). The University of Southampton had developed
the EPrints software, which was intended to create highly
configurable web-based archive. It is open source software and
is free for download. GNU EPrints is an open source software
to build, manage and provide access to e-print archives. The
technical requirements include UNIX/Linux, based on Perl, built
on Apache web server and uses MySQL database.
Other packages for creating IRs include the following:

CDSware (http://cdsware.cern.ch) developed
by CERN and used to run its very substantial
CERN Document Server (over 630,000
bibliographic records, including 250,000
fulltext documents);
Bepress (http://www.bepress.com/repositories.html):

created by The Berkeley Electronic Press for
the University of California's eScholarship
Repository;
Kepler (http://dlib.cs.odu.edu/):

The purpose of Kepler is to give any user the ability
to easily self-archive publications by means of an
"archivelet": a self-contained, self-installing software
system that functions as an Open Archives Initiative
data provider;
Fedora (http://www.fedora.info):

Fedora (http://www.fedora.info): an ambitious
project developed jointly by Virginia and Cornell with
funding from Mellon. Fedora is a general-purpose
digital object repository system that can be used in
whole or part to support a variety of use cases
including: institutional repositories, digital libraries,
content management, digital asset management,
scholarly publishing, and digital preservation;
i-Tor (http://www.i-tor.org/en/toon):

i-Tor (http://www.i-tor.org/en/toon): Tools and
technologies for Open Repositories was developed
by the Innovative Technology-Applied (IT-A) section
of Netherlands Institute for Scientific Information
Services. i-Tor acts as both an OAI service provider,
able to harvest OAI compatible repositories and
other databases, and an OAI data provider;
MPG eDoc
(http://edoc.mpg.de/doc/help/aboutus.epl):

MPG eDoc
(http://edoc.mpg.de/doc/help/aboutus.epl):
developed by the Max Planck Gesellschaft in
cooperation with the Fritz-Haber Institute. Currently
used by many Max Planck institutes to “capture,
document, share, archive, publish, disseminate and
manage their scientific documents and the results of
their research”;
MyCoRe (http://www.mycore.de/engl/index.html):

MyCoRe (http://www.mycore.de/engl/index.html):
MyCoRe grew out of the MILESS Project of the
University of Essen and is now being developed by a
consortium of universities to provide a core bundle of
software tools to support digital libraries and
archiving solutions (or Content Repositories, thus
“CoRe”);
OPUS(http://elib.unistuttgart.de/opus/doku/english/about_english.php):

Online Publications University of Stuttgart.
Also used by University of Konstanz;
Ebrary (http://www.ebrary.com/libraries/ir.jsp):

Ebrary (http://www.ebrary.com/libraries/ir.jsp):
the aggregator / database company is offering a
“new product that enables libraries to cost-effectively
create online institutional repositories of documents
such as theses and dissertations, technical reports,
e-prints, articles, curricula guidelines and special
collections. In preparation, we’re extending a free
pilot program to our existing customers and libraries
that subscribe to our databases”;
Ingenta (http://www.ingenta.com):

have already announced a collaboration with
Southampton University to develop a commercial
version of EPrints. Ingenta say that they have
undertaken considerable research into
author/university requirements.
Greenstone
(http://www.greenstone.org):

Greenstone is a suite of software for building and
distributing digital library collections. It provides a
new way of organizing information and publishing it
on the Internet or on CD-ROM. Greenstone is
produced by the New Zealand Digital Library Project
at the University of Waikato, and developed and
distributed in cooperation with UNESCO and the
Human Info NGO. It is open-source, multilingual
software, issued under the terms of the GNU
General Public License. Though Greenstone is
widely used to build digital libraries, yet some of the
libraries have also been using it for creating IR.
Institutional Repositories in India

The prestigious research institutes and universities
in India have developed IRs and more and more
universities and research institutes that are creating
and managing the IRs is gradually increasing. There
are 54 institutional repositories in India registered
through the Directory of Open Access Repositories
(DOAR – http://www.doar.org), this table indicates
the name of the repository, its parent organization,
software used and the number of resources they are
having.
Institutional Repositories in India
S.No
Name of Repository
Organization
Software
used
Number of Items
1.
Catalysis Database
National Centre for Catalysis
Research(NCCR)
EPrints
2324 items
(2012-09-03)
2.
CMFRI Digital Repository
Central Marine Fisheries Research
Institute (CMFRI)
EPrints
8714 items
(2012-08-21)
3.
Delhi College of
Engineering Repository
Delhi Technological University,
DSpace
326 items (201203-06)
4.
Dhananjayarao Gadigil
Library
Gokhale Institute of Politics and
Economics (GIPE)
DSpace
1539 items
(2012-06-29)
5.
Digital Knowledge
Repository of Central Drug
Research Institute
Central Drug Research Institute
(CDRI)
DSpace
547 items (201209-03)
6.
Digital Library at Indian
Statistical Institute,
Bangalore
Indian Statistical Institute,
Bangalore Centre (ISI)
DSpace
191 items (201206-29)
Institutional Repositories in India
7.
Dyuthi (Digital repository
of Cochin University of
Science & Technology)
Cochin University of Science &
Technology (CUSAT)
DSpace
2282 items
(2012-09-03)
8.
DigitalLibrary@CUSAT
CUSAT (Cochin University of
Science and Technology)
DSpace
5074 items
(2012-09-03)
9.
DRS at National Institute
Of Oceanography
(DRS@nio)
NICMAS (NIO library), National
Institute Of Oceanography (NIO)
DSpace
4119 items
(2012-09-03)
10.
DSpace @ GGSIPU
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha
University
DSpace
131 items
(2012-09-03)
11.
dspace @ sdmcet
SDM College Of Engineering and
Technology Dharwad
DSpace
66 items (201209-03)
12.
DSpace at IBS
Ahmedabad
ICFAI Business School
DSpace
171 items
(2009-03-13)
13.
Dspace at IIT Bombay
Indian Institue of Technology,
Bombay (IITB)
DSpace
14075 items
(2012-09-03)
Institutional Repositories in India
14.
DSpace at Indian Institute of
Management Kozhikode
Indian Institute of Management
Kozhikode
DSpace
508 items (201209-03)
15.
DSpace at IUCAA
Inter-University Centre for
Astronomy and Astrophysics
(IUCAA)
DSpace
2327 items (201209-04)
16.
DSpace at NCRA
Indian Institue of Technology,
Bombay (IITB)
DSpace
84 items (201111-10)
17.
DSpace at Vidyanidhi
University of Mysore
DSpace
5482 items (201209-03)
18.
DSpace@IMSC
Institute of Mathematical Sciences,
DSpace
275 items (201209-03)
19.
DSpace@INFLIBNET
Information and Library Network
Center
DSpace
1274 items (201209-03)
20.
Dspace@NITR
National Institute of Technology,
Rourkela (NITR)
DSpace
1684 items (201209-03)
Institutional Repositories in India
21.
DSpace@PDPU
Pandit Deendayal Petroleum
Univeristy (PDPU)
DSpace
86 items (201209-03)
22.
DSpace@TU
Thapar University (TU)
DSpace
1840 items
(2012-09-03)
23.
DU Eprint Archive
University of Delhi
Eprints
170 items (201206-11)
24.
eGyankosh
Indira Gandhi National Open
University (IGNOU)
DSpace
23903 items
(2012-09-03)
25.
Electronic Theses and
Dissertations at Indian
Institute of Science
Indian Institute of Science,
Bangalore (IISc)
DSpace
1694 items
(2012-09-03)
26.
Eprint@NML
National Metallurgical Laboratory EPrints
5181 items
(2012-09-03)
27.
Eprints@IARI
Indian Agricultural Research
Institute (IARI)
230 items (201209-03)
EPrints
Institutional Repositories in India
28.
EPrints@IITD
Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi
(IITD)
National Institute of Immunology (NII)
DSpace
29.
ePrints@NII
30.
Eprints@SBT MKU
School of Biotechnology (SBT), Madurai
Kamaraj University (MKU),
EPrints
31.
Etheses - A Saurashtra University
Library Service
Saurashtra University
EPrints
801 items (2012-0903)
32.
ICRISAT Open Access Repository
International Crops Research Institute for
the Semi Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)
N.G.
5695 items (2012-0903)
33.
Bhagirathi
Mahatama Gandhi Central Library, Indian
Institute of Technlogy Roorkee, India
DSpace
966 items (2012-0903)
34.
Indian Academy of Sciences:
Publications of Fellows
Indian Academy of Sciences
EPrints
88683 items (201209-03)
EPrints
2141 items (2012-0903)
10 items (2012-0716)
89 items (2012-0628)
Institutional Repositories in India
35.
Indian Institute of Astrophysics
Repository
Indian Institute of Astrophysics
DSpace
5627 items (201209-03)
36.
Indian Institute of Management
Kozhikode Digital Library
Indian Institute of Management
Kozhikode (IIMK)
Greenstone
N.G.
37.
Indian Institute of Petroleum
Institutional Repository
Indian Institute of Petroleum Library,
Indian Institute of Petroleum, Dehradun
DSpace
439 items (2012-0629)
38.
Institutional Repository of
Intectual Contributions of Delhi
Technological University
Delhi Technological University
DSpace
841 items (2011-0302)
39.
Kautilya Digital Repository at
IGIDR
Indira Gandhi Institute of Development
Research (IGIDR)
DSpace
204 items (2012-0903)
40.
E-Repository@IIHR
Indian Institute of Horticultural
Research (ICAR)
DSpace
206 items (2012-0821)
41.
Knowledge Repository Open
Network (KNoor)
Department of Library & Information
Science, University of Kashmir
DSpace
580 items (2012-0903)
Institutional Repositories in India
42.
Librarians' Digital Library (LDL)
Documentation Research and Training
Centre (DRTC), Indian Statistical Institute,
Bangalore Centre (ISI)
DSpace
464 items (2012-0903)
43.
Mahatma Gandhi University
Theses Online
Mahatma Gandhi University
Nitya
1116 items (2012-0903)
44.
Management Development
Institute - Open Access Repository
Management Development Institute (MDI)
DSpace
325 items (2012-0629)
45.
National Aerospace Laboratories
Institutional Repository
Information Centre for Aerospace Science
and Technology (ICAST)
EPrints
4881 items (2012-0903)
46.
National Science Digital Library
NISCAIR (National Institute of Science
Communication and Information
Resources)
DSpace
572 items (2012-0903)
47.
NOPR (NISCAIR Online Periodical
Repository)
NISCAIR (National Institute of Science
Communication and Information
Resources)
DSpace
13012 items (201209-03)
48.
Open Access Agricultural Research
Repository
Agropedia, IIT Kanpur
N.G
N.G
Institutional Repositories in India
49.
Open Access Repository
of IISc Research
Publications
Indian Institute of Science,
Bangalore (IISc)
EPrints
33939 items
(2012-09-03)
50.
OpenMED@NIC
Bibliographic Informatics
Division, National Informatics
Centre (NIC)
EPrints
2858 items
(2012-09-03)
51.
RRI Digital Repository
Raman Research Institute,
DSpace
5023 items
(2012-09-03)
52.
ePrints@SVNIT
Sardar Vallabhbai National
Institute of Technology (SVNIT)
EPrints
14 items (201206-29)
53.
ShodhGanga: A resevior
of Indian Theses
Information and Library
Network Center (INFLIBNET)
DSpace
3385 items
(2012-09-03)
54.
Vidya Prasarak Mandal Thane
Vidya Prasarak Mandal
DSpace
1079 items
(2012-09-03)
Conclusion


The IR implementations have been on the increase in academic institutions and
research organizations worldwide. Most of the content in IRs is not journal
articles and is not self-archived by the authors, but collections are created by
libraries as one-time deposits or through periodic batch additions of material.
The libraries are harvesting or otherwise mediating deposits, including technical
reports, conference papers, student theses and dissertations, images, and nonscholarly publications.
In order to make the IR useful and popular among the academic and research
community, the faculty should be made aware of the open access movement
and existence of IRs; the benefits of archiving; value addition to individuals; and
also self- archiving mandates. The most successful IRs are those that strive to
engage a diverse set of groups across campus, specifically liaising and serving
both academic and non-academic units, accepting a wide scope of content,
aligning repository services with the mission of the university, and facilitating
new opportunities for knowledge production and publication.
Thank you