The Federal Court System Chapter 11 Journal Suppose a brand new, bright red sports car is stolen in Chicago. Two days later, the driver (we’ll call him Joe), is stopped for speeding in Atlanta. Where, now, will he be tried for car theft? Why do you think this? What the Constitution says “The Judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish” CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY Article III, Sect. 1-3 1. Terms, behavior and salaries Sets ups Supreme Court and lesser courts 2. Supreme power in in cases of law, hears cases involving ambassadors and foreign dignitaries 3. Treason, levying war against the U.S. or assisting enemies (congress decides punishment) Adjudicates interstate cases Adjudicates maritime issues Chief Justice presides over impeachment cases Sets up rules for lower courts Note: tries very few cases. Important Note We have a dual Court system! We have the national judiciary with more than 100 courts across the country. Also, each of the 50 States have their own system of courts. State courts hear most of the cases in this country. * Ask yourself how this connects to federalism! Two Kinds of Federal Courts Congress has created two types of federal courts: 1. Constitutional Courts: exercise broad judicial power 2. Special Courts: have a narrow range of issues they hear cases on Ex: Court of Military Appeals, Claims Court, Tax Court Comparing Court Systems Federal Court System State Court System U.S. Supreme Court Highest State Courts (hears 80-90 cases) (50 courts handling 95,000 cases) U.S. Courts of Appeals State Intermediate Appellate Courts (13 courts handling 40,410 cases) U.S. District Courts (94 courts handling 290,167 cases) (found in ½ the states) (handling 300,000 cases) State Trial Courts (92 million filings) FIGURIN’ IT OUT.. Constitutions (federal and states) Statutory law English Common Law THE RULE OF LAW The principle that laws must be publicized, nonarbitrary, and uniformly applied; no citizen is above the law. THE RULE OF LAW Courts-3rd party referees Common law (English)-legal rules created by judges Precedent-laws previously established or interpreted (stare decisis, let the decision stand) Constitutional law-set forth by the founders and judicial branch interpretation/decisions THE RULE OF LAW con’t. Statutory law-a law passed by a state or federal governing body Civil law-laws regarding interaction between individuals, developed by ruling bodies such as legislatures (marriage, contracts, injuries etc). Violations are “torts”. Criminal law-violations against a code inflicting harm on individuals or society Administrative law-developed by the bureaucracy (regulations) Executive order-issued by president to clarify legislation AND…. Substantive law-relates to what we can and can’t do Procedural law-how laws are applied and how legal proceedings are facilitated Procedural due process-protections that must be enforced to protect the accused IT’S FUNCTIONS Laws provide security for our well being and possessions Laws provide predictability (knowing and understanding the law) Laws provide conflict resolution Laws reinforce societal values Laws extend protections and benefits Jurisdiction the authority of a court to hear and decide a case Constitution gives the federal courts jurisdiction based on 1) subject matter or 2) the parties involved in the case. Subject Matter 1. 2. The interpretation and application of the Constitution or in any federal law or treaty Matters relating to the high seas or navigable waters WHAT MAKES IT A FEDERAL CASE? If it involves the U.S. Government If the amount at stake is more than $50,000 If it involves more than one state If it involves a dispute on the waters surrounding the country If it involves a citizen of another country In these cases Federal Courts provide a more neutral setting for resolving those differences. Parties 1. 2. 3. 4. The United States or one of its officers or agencies An ambassador, consul or other official representative of a foreign government A State suing another State, or a citizen of another State, or a foreign government or one of its subjects. A citizen on one State suing a citizen of another State or a foreign government * 11th Amendment Types of Jurisdiction Exclusive Jurisdiction: those cases can be heard only in federal courts- involving an ambassador, person charged with a federal crime, involving the infringement of a patent or copyright, or a case involving any other matter arising out of an act of Congress. Concurrent Jurisdiction: cases that can be heard in state or federal court- involving citizens of different states Original Jurisdiction- where a case is first heard (district courts and S.C.) Appellate Jurisdiction- where a court hears a case on appeal (appellate courts and the S.C.) CASE GROWTH 1941-42: 1,302 petitions to the Supreme Court 1999-2000: 7,377 petitions to the Supreme Court CASES, CASES, CASES 7,000 Petitions per year 80-100 heard 1,200 other applications handled by individual justices Court will not hear hypothetical cases EXPANDED POWERS 1803 Marbury v Madison decision by John Marshall (fourth Chief Justice) Power of Judicial Review First overrule 1810 striking down a Georgia law involving a “land deal” Note: Madison/HamiltonFederalist papers JUDICIAL REVIEW Theoretically the courts were constitutionally empowered to review laws and presidential actions but did not claim it It was not employed because there were so few laws passed, communication and travel were problematical and high turnover on the court Even after Marbury v Madison the court seldom asserted itself for several years THE CAST John Adams (Federalist) elected as second president in 1796 defeating Jefferson (Republican) John Marshall appointed as Secretary of State and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court by President Adams William Marbury nominated as a Justice of the Peace by President Adams Thomas Jefferson elected as third president in 1800 defeating Adams James Madison appointed as Secretary of State by President Jefferson (later elected as the fourth president (1808) THE PROBLEM President John Adams made a number of late judicial appointments as he was leaving office William Marbury was appointed Justice of the Peace in Washington D.C. by Adams and confirmed by the Senate Paperwork not submitted by then Secretary of State John Marshall The new president, Thomas Jefferson wanted his own appointees and refused to accept Marbury, ordering his Secretary of State, James Madison to halt the process Marbury appealed directly to the Supreme Court THE CONFLICT Article III 2. Supreme power in cases of law, hears cases involving ambassadors and foreign dignitaries (original jurisdiction) Judiciary Act 0f 1789 Congress empowered the judicial branch to issue writs of mandamus (directives to government officials to act) FINDING THE SOLUTION The options Order Jefferson to comply (no way to enforce) Bow to Jefferson’s wishes (wimpy) The outcome Marshall lecture to Jefferson Acknowledged court’s lack of authority Invalidate the part of the Judiciary Act of 1789 where congress gave the courts the power to hear such cases directly (unconstitutional) because it expanded its powers The consequence Power of Judicial Review THE POWER OF JUDICIAL REVIEW Laws declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court 1789-1998 Federal-143 State-1,237 1960-1998 Federal-71 State-553 FEDERAL AND STATE JUDICIAL SYSTEMS FEDS AND THE STATE Supreme Court (appointed for life) Courts of Appeal District Courts (trial) Supreme Court (appointed for 12 yrs and extended by the voters) Courts of Appeal Superior Courts (trial) District Courts They are the federal trial courts. Handle 80% of the federal case load. 50 states are divided into 89 judicial districts, with one court in each district. Hear criminal and civil cases, from kidnapping and tax evasion to bankruptcy and civil rights. The only federal courts that regularly use juries. Most decisions are final, however some cases are appealed to the court of appeals in that judicial circuit and in some cases go directly to the S.C. Courts of Appeals Created as “gatekeepers” to help ease the load of the S.C. in 1891. There are 13 courts of appeals. U.S. is divided into 12 judicial circuits (plus one in D.C.) Cases are heard by panels of 3 judges. Only have appellate jurisdiction. Their decisions are final unless the S.C. chooses to hear appeals taken from them. The 13th court of appeal is the Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit and hears cases about patents, contracts and financial claims against the federal government. COURT OF APPEALS No trials 3 judge panel (28 judges) 28-30,000 decisions a year (25% of total appeals) 13th COURT OF APPEALS Located in Washington D.C. Handles specific cases of appeals (claims, customs, patents, veterans, international trade) Possible “stepping stone” to the Supreme Court CHIEF JUSTICE Appointed by president Administers court (350 employees, $70 m budget) “leader among equals” Highly influential States opinion first Votes first Assigns opinion writing Issues Oath of Office Presides over impeachment Presides at the annual Judicial Conference of the United States Seventeen to date CHASE AND FORTAS Samuel Chase (1796-1811): only justice to be impeached and tried by the Senate (acquitted) Abe Fortas (1965-69): only justice to resign under pressure (financial irregularities from outside income) NOTABLE DECISIONS (the good, the bad and the ugly) Partial birth abortion ban, 2000 voted unconstitutional under Roe v. Wade Bush v. Gore, 2000, overruling Florida State Supreme Court University of California v. Bakke, 1978, limited Affirmative Action (Prop. 209, 1997) THE GOOD…… Roe v. Wade, 1973, woman’s right to privacy Miranda v. Arizona, 1966, suspects’ rights Brown v. Board of Education, 1954, segregation in schools unconstitutional, overturning Plessy v. Ferguson, 1896 THE BAD AND THE UGLY… Korematsu v. U.S., 1944, Government’s right to imprison U.S. citizens THE INTERNMENT CAMPS MORE UGLY…. Dred Scott v. Sanford, 1857, established slaves as non-citizens (lived in the free state of Illinois and free territory of Wisconsin) Plessy v. Ferguson, 1896, racial segregation legal (separate but equal doctrine) U.S. SUPREME COURT Sits in Washington D.C. Chief Justice, eight associate justices APPOINTMENTS Nominated* by the President in the event of retirement, resignation or death Senatorial Courtesy/Blue Slips on District nominees Recommendations by the Attorney General, Justice Department, American Bar Association (not as much) Senate Judiciary Committee hearings and recommendation Must receive a majority vote from the Senate *Washington (11), Roosevelt (9), Clinton note……. APPOINTMENTS con’t Appointment for life (only branch unelected) Import of 13th Court of Appeals (Wash. D.C.) Current prognosis……….age & health JOHN JAY First Chief Justice Lawyer, statesman Opposed British oppression Opposed independence Supported colonies after Declaration of Independence Continental Cong. 1774-75 Elected President 1778 Federalist Papers (1787-88) Treaty of Paris (1763) Jay’s Treaty (1794) First Chief Justice (1789-95) appointed by Pres. Washington COURT COMPOSITION, TERMS AND SALARIES Number of justices (6-10) Court demographics Staff and clerk support Appointed for life, can only be removed through impeachment* Confirmation process Salaries: Assoc. Just. $199,200 & Chief $208,100 (2005) *1805 Samuel Chase, impeached for arbitrary and oppressive conduct of trials (not convicted) 1789, six by Washington 1807, seven by Jefferson 1837, nine by congress 1863, ten by Lincoln 1866, eight by congress 1937, fifteen by FDR Note: nine since the Judiciary Act of 1869 BRANCH $ALARY COMPARISON$ As of January 2005 President $400,000 Vice President $208,100 Speaker of the House $208,100 House Majority & Minority Leaders $180,100 House/Senate Members & Delegates $162,100 Chief Justice, Supreme Court $208,100 Associate Justices, Supreme Court $199,200 JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY Judicial Activism: justices interpret laws and precedents loosely, sometimes interjecting personal values reflecting current social conditions Judicial Restraint: justices adhere closely to laws and precedents with very little personal interjection of views (Founders’ intent) AND… Strict Constructionism: the belief that the only method of changing the Constitution is by the amendment process Judicial interpretivism: defining the Constitution as a living document that may be redefined as it relates to social change OVERTURNRED Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) separate but equal Brown v. Bd. Of Ed. (1954) overturned Plessy Olmstead v US (1919) prohibition, right to privacy Katz v. US (1967) bookmaking, overturned Olmstead Koramatsu v. US (1944) internment of Japanese Americans 1988 Congress the “grave injustice” and compensates each survivor with $20,000 Bowers v. Hardwick, 1986, Georgia state regulation of sex between consenting adults (overturned 2003, Lawrence v. Texas) IMPORTANT TERMS & NUMBERS (review) Amicus Curiae: “Friends of the court” request consideration of case and/or influence in outcome Writ of certiorari: formal request by the U.S. Supreme Court to call up the lower court case it decides to hear on appeal Rule of Four: requirement that four Supreme Court justices must agree to grant a case certiorari in order for the case to be heard Quorum: six justices must be present to conduct court business Simple majority: five votes of the nine