Department of Anthropology College of Social Sciences Program Planning Committee Report to the Provost April 3, 2013 The Department of Anthropology offers undergraduate and graduate degrees in Anthropology, as well as several interdisciplinary majors and minors. The undergraduate program is comprised of 42 units, and has 105 majors and 67 minors. Between 10-15 graduate students are admitted each year to the new MA in Applied Anthropology program, added in 2007. A new interdisciplinary Organizational Studies major, to be housed within Anthropology, has been proposed, and the department is developing a new minor and certificate program called “Values, Technology and Society.” The department uses an organizing framework for courses and faculty research they call the “umbrella” model, with three umbrellas: 1) Human Adaptability and Material Culture, 2) the Anthropology of Wellness, and 3) Knowledge in Action. Currently, the Department of Anthropology offers the following programs: BA in Anthropology Interdisciplinary BA in Behavioral Sciences (with Economics, Psychology, and Sociology) Interdisciplinary minor in Native American Studies Masters in Applied Anthropology Strengths of the program As noted in the program plan, external review report, and the Dean’s letter, the Anthropology program is a strong program with a productive and cohesive faculty, multiple interdisciplinary connections, and a new graduate program. Below is a summary of strengths: Strong, highly valued leadership Cohesive, collaborative department faculty and staff Reflective, active assessment processes result in informed, responsive decisions and actions Strategic thinking has helped create a balanced portfolio of courses and a set of unifying themes for coursework and research Many interdisciplinary connections with other departments within college and across university Cutting edge curriculum in the field Strong faculty with diverse and active research agendas, closely connected to and involved with community Alumni and current students report valuing the coursework and employment connections provided by the program Students involved in faculty research and applied projects Challenges of the program Leadership changes, new program development, and new hires have resulted in a number of challenges for the program. These include: Recent loss of senior faculty Graduate program in applied anthropology lacks adequate faculty Limited resources hamper department’s wish to expand research portfolio to larger projects with multiple faculty members Increased administrative and advising work with new programs not adequately resourced Inadequate lab space with addition of new archeology faculty members 1 Assessment A range of excellent assessment approaches and practices were described in the Program Review and Program Plan reports submitted by the department that encompassed GE courses offered by the department, as well as objectives and outcomes specific to the undergraduate and graduate programs offered. Qualitative methods were utilized to assess outcomes within the affective domain of learning using targeted essay questions and class learning projects that allowed students to demonstrate mastery tied to specific program learning outcomes. Course instructors sampled and evaluated student work that was discussed by faculty during ongoing discussions of curriculum strengths and refinement. Substantive changes in outcomes, including the development of more measurable outcomes were made early in the period of review. Perspective gained through the assessment process helped drive a realignment of the program (including changes in the major, elimination of double majors, and development of a graduate program) and reformulation of future assessment efforts. A self-evaluation of each of the major and master’s programs was conducted using the WASC Program Outcomes Rubric. Descriptions of this process included general determinations of PLOs associated with each program. Self-ratings ranged from “Developed” to “Highly Developed. The efforts described are impressive, particularly related to the use of qualitative and self-rating data to continuously improve student learning and successful outcomes. Additionally, the external reviewer cited the emphases on AAC&U high impact practices and assessment rubrics within the department. Overall, the assessment practices and ongoing evaluation of teaching and learning integrated into the department should be commended. It is recommended that future reports include the following for each program: Program learning outcomes (PLOs) A matrix mapping courses to (PLOs) A matrix mapping PLOs to University Learning Goals (recently passed by the Academic Senate) Descriptions of qualitative and quantitative measures and procedures Tables of aggregated data and data analyses Interpretation and discussion of data (closing the loop, as provided in current report) Next Steps The final step in the program planning process is a meeting with Provost Junn (or her designee), AVP of Undergraduate Studies Jaehne, AVP of Graduate Studies and Research Stacks, Dean Bienenfeld, and Department Chair Darrah. The Chair may invite directors of programs within the department. The department should contact staff in the Office of Undergraduate Studies to schedule the final meeting. The following topics for discussion are summarized from the reports: Succession management planning Plan for faculty hires to sustain programs and quality of programs Plans for external and internal resource development Requirements for administrative support and student advising Follow-up on proposed Organizational Studies major, new minor and certificate program Plan for improving lab and classroom space 2 Recommendation The Program Planning Committee recommends acceptance of the Program Plan. The Program Plan provided a thorough examination of the issues and explanation of plans for subsequent reviewers. The next Program Plan for all programs in the department will be due to the College Dean Bienenfeld in Spring 2017. Spring 2013 Program Planning Committee members: Debra Caires (Chair) Yasue Kodama Yanai Amy D’Andrade Anthony Raynsford Alaka Rao Sutee Sujitparapitaya Dennis Jaehne Julio Soto Pam Stacks Diana Wu Linda Main Mary Wilson CC: Michael Crump Wenbin Wei Jinny Rhee Jeffrey Hummel Lynda Heiden Mary Calegari Chuck Darrah, Chair, Department of Anthropology Sheila Bienenfeld, Dean, College of Social Sciences Jan English-Lueck, Associate Dean, College of Social Sciences Shannon Bros-Seemann, Chair, Curriculum and Research Dennis Jaehne, AVP Undergraduate Studies Pam Stacks, AVP Graduate Studies and Research 3 Appendix Description of Department and Programs The Department of Anthropology is based in the College of Social Sciences. It offers: BA in Anthropology Interdisciplinary BA, Behavioral Sciences (with Communication Studies, Economics, Psychology, and Sociology) Interdisciplinary Minor, Native American Studies (with Communication Studies, Sociology, Women’s Studies, Mexican American Studies, Art History) Interdisciplinary Minor, Values, Technology and Society M.A., Applied Anthropology Certificate program under development At the time of the program plan submission in 2011, the Department listed 105 anthropology majors, 67 minors and 37 Applied Anthropology graduate students. The Department also provides administrative support and all academic advising for the interdisciplinary Behavioral Science Program serving 315 majors. The RDE for Fall 2011 showed a headcount of 359 students; and SFR of 28.6. Most students are drawn from the local area. The department has continued in its strong tradition in cultural anthropology while expanding its focus on archaeology, physical anthropology, and applied anthropology. In order to ensure collaboration, interdisciplinary study and research, and integrative learning within all programs the Department has set up three "umbrellas" Human Adaptability and Material Culture The Anthropology of Wellness Knowledge in Action For each umbrella, the department has organized a set of research questions, identified existing supporting courses (required and electives), proposed supporting courses to develop in the future, and created meaningful and appropriate learning objectives which can be easily assessed. The umbrellas are applied to each program. For the BA degrees students take lower division classes in each of socio‐cultural anthropology, physical anthropology, and archaeology, a theory course and a capstone course. The capstone course requires students to synthesize their knowledge about the fields of anthropology while placing the discipline in a wider social science context. The capstone course also serves as a professional development course with career building exercises connecting the major to either graduate programs or another career. At the upper division level, students are required to take a methods course (in any of the sub‐fields), two courses in each of socio‐cultural anthropology, physical anthropology, and archaeology and two electives drawn from statistics or geography. Currently the MA focuses more on issues of cultural applied anthropology covering advanced theory, research methodologies, and fields of application. Students take electives from outside the department and work on external projects. The Department follows the high impact educational practices from the Association of American Colleges and Universities and places high importance on writing, collaborative assignments and projects; service and community based learning. 4 Faculty Seven faculty active in the Department: Darrah (applied cultural anthropologist), Dept. Chair and Professor Gonzalez (socio cultural anthropologist), Professor Meniketti (archaeologist), Associate Professor Salazar (medical cultural anthropologist), Assistant Professor Stein (archaeologist; not listed on the Department Web site), Assistant Professor Sunseri (archaeologist), Assistant Professor Weiss (physical anthropologist), Associate Professor Dr. English-Lueck moved to the College of Social Science as Associate Dean Dr. Reckmeyer has entered the FERP program. Part-time Faculty/Lecturers Eleven with five lecturers hired at .8 Scholarly, University, and Professional Activity The faculty (including lecturers) maintain an active research and publication program in addition to their teaching. There is a strong focus on the dissemination of empirical research. The CVs attached to the program plan indicate an extensive record of conference presentations, journal publications, books, leadership in professional organizations, and involvement with community projects. Internal and External Funding Some success in securing external funding based on individual projects. The department secured a gift of $100,000 in Spring 2011. Clerical Support 1.5 Use of Technology, Equipment and Facilities Faculty members are experimenting with hybrid courses in which instruction takes place in the classroom, but a portion of the class is conducted virtually through course wikis, online posting of class assignments, review guides, and other materials. Ethnographic laboratory with digital recording equipment is used in course assignments and research projects No interest in moving program online when the program plan was written. College Committee Summary N/A External Reviewer (Key Points) Recommendations: Visit 19th and 20th March 2012 New Faculty Two new cultural applied faculty with fundable research and leadership qualities One physical anthropologist (who can work at both the undergraduate and graduate levels) One linguistic anthropologist (who may fill one of the recommended cultural/applied position hires, or be in addition to those two hires) 5 Improved Lab Space Reconfigure Rooms 4, 2, and 2A into one large lab space with modular walls and furniture for synergistic research space for the whole department. This will require clearing space in the Curation room. Provide a classroom for the Anthropology department’s use to replace Room 4 as an Anthropology classroom space. Provide a budget to refurbish the new lab space, including the removal of walls, purchasing modular furniture/walls, etc. Provide 5 to 6 I‐Mac laptops for lab use Provide software, e.g., Deduce site license, GIS software, other, as needed for faculty/student research and class projects Provide updated maps Provide .20 for Elizabeth Weiss Fall to clean out the Curation space Increased Staff Change the ½ staff position to full‐time position for the full‐time staff member to take on the following: To assist with administration of the multi‐disciplinary Organizational Studies BA To assist with administration of the Values, Technology, Society minor To assist with administration of new Values, Technology, Society certificate program to serve the community, e.g., teachers, engineers, others already working in a given field To take on some of the burden of MA and BA routine advising External Reviewer Dr. Barbara LeMaster Anthropology Department Chair, CSU Long Beach Dean’s Report dated 21st November 2012 Strongly supportive stressing: High quality scholarship Pedagogically sound curriculum Continuously assessing curriculum Umbrella structure is a model for unbounded learning Teaching lab in Washington Square Hall is an example of 21st century learning spaces 6