Public-Private Partnerships: Evolving Resources Counselors of Real Estate Mid-year Meeting New York, NY March 30, 2009 Stephen B. Friedman, CRE, AICP Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Overview 1. 2. 3. 4. The Stimulus and Development New Markets Tax Credits Low Income Housing Tax Credits The Local Tool Kit Tax Incremental Financing Business Improvement Districts Other Tools 1 Sales Tax Sharing Special Assessments Infrastructure Bonding Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation 1. The Stimulus and Development Not your Grandfather’s Keynesian Economics Several Major Initiatives Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA) Heartland Disaster Tax Relief Act of 2008 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Special Katrina Provisions Holding Over Pending: Transportation Reauthorization Bill 2 Push for Integration of Land Use/Transportation Decisions Confluence of Infrastructure/Land Use/Environment Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Stimulus, Cont’d Tax-exempt Bonds Recovery Zone/Empowerment Zone Economic Development Bonds ($10 Billion) Facility Bonds ($15 Billion) Tax Exempt Private Activity Bonds Heartland Disaster Tax Relief Act of 2008 (Arkansas, Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, Missouri, Nebraska and Wisconsin Counties) $14.1 Billion 3 Taxable Federal Reimbursement to County/Muni of 45% of Interest Paid Multi-family Rental Housing Public Utility Property Mortgage Financing Commercial Development Broadly Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Stimulus, Cont’d Highways and Bridges 29 Billion Airport Improvements $1.3 Billion Mostly FAA, Safety Improvements Brownfields and Environment $100 Million for Clean-Up Grants; $600 Million Superfund Sites Part of Broader $10 Billion Environmental Infrastructure 4 Clean Water Superfund Watershed and Flood Prevention Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Stimulus, Cont’d Other Public Works including Army Corps and Public Buildings Transit Intercity Rail $8.4 Billion including New Starts/TOD Opportunities $9.3 Billion, $8 Billion of Which Is for High-Speed Rail School Funds 5 Including Modernization Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Stimulus, Cont’d Additional New Markets Tax Credits (NMTC) Authorization $3 Billion, ½ Added to Each of ’08 and ’09 Two-year Total: $10 Billion Housing Provisions 6 Additional $.20 per Capita LIHTC Treasury Exchange Window for LIHTC at $.85 $2.25 B Home Funds for LIHTC Project Gaps $1 B Additional CDBG $2 B Additional Section 8 Funding for Rehab $2 B Additional Neighborhood Stabilization Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation 2. New Markets Tax Credits The New-New Thing New Markets Tax Credits Support Commercial and Industrial Development in Qualifying Areas Increases Access to and/or Lowers Cost of Capital Supplements TIF, EZ and Other Funds 7 NMTC: A Tax Credit for Equity Investments in CDEs Community Development Entities (CDEs): Mission to Serve Low-income Communities Low-Income Communities (LICs): 20% Poverty or Where Median Family Income Is Below 80% of AMI Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation New Markets Tax Credits, Cont’d Created in 2000 as part of Community Renewal Tax Relief Act Companion program to Low Income Housing Tax Credit Administered by CDFI Fund division of U.S. Treasury Primarily support industrial, community facility, and commercial development in qualifying Census tracts Can also support direct loans/equity investments to operating businesses 8 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation New Markets Tax Credits, Cont’d 7-year stream of federal income tax credit benefits triggered by the flow of debt or equity capital through a “CDE” Increase access to and/or lower cost of capital (e.g., lower interest rates, partial loan forgiveness, etc.) Awarded on a competitive national basis to CDEs 9 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Federal Authorization 2001-02 $2.5 billion 2003-04 $3.5 billion 2005 $2 billion 2006 $3.5 billion 2007 $3.5 billion 2008 $3.5 billion * 2009 $3.5 billion * *Additional Approved Allocation for 2008 and 2009 per Stimulus Bill: $3 billion for $5 billion total each year 10 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation New Markets Tax Credits, Cont’d CDFI Fund (U.S. Treasury) Allocation of NMTCs QEI Private Investors 7-year Stream of NMTC Benefits 11 Community Development Entity (CDE) QLICI Qualifying Project/Business (QALICB) Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation What is a CDE? Community Development Entity, certified by CDFI Fund (division of U.S. Treasury) Domestic corporation or partnership For-profit or non-profit Controlled by private, non-profit, or government organizations Intermediary vehicle for the provision of loans or other investments in “Low-Income Communities” (LICs) CDEs are required to demonstrate that they: Have a primary mission of serving LICs and/or Low-Income Persons Are accountable to residents of the LICs that they serve 12 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Areas of Eligibility in City of Chicago 13 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation New Markets Tax Credits, Cont’d CDEs Use Investments to Make “Qualified LowIncome Community Investments” (QLICIs) QLICIs include: 14 Capital or Equity Investment in, or Loan to, any “Qualified Active LowIncome Community Business” (QALICB) Equity Investment in, or Loan to, any CDE Purchase of a Loan from Another CDE Financial Counseling and Other Services to Businesses Located in LICs Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation What Is the Tax Credit Benefit? For investment (QEI) of $1.00, investor would receive a seven-year federal income tax credit of: Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 $0.05 $0.05 $0.05 $0.06 $0.06 $0.06 $0.06 TOTAL VALUE OVER 7 YEARS = $0.39 Up-Front Discounted Value: Generally $0.25 to $0.30 Above Example Consumes $1 of “Allocation” 15 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Allowable Uses of NMTC Financing Must be provided to a Qualified Active Low-Income Community Business (QALICB) Debt, equity, or “hybrid” financings Commercial, industrial, institutional, not-for-profit projects For-sale housing (challenging timing issues) Mixed-use project (provided rental housing is <80% of income stream) Operating businesses 16 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Qualified Low-Income Community Investments (QLICIs) Capital provided by a CDE to a “Qualified Active LowIncome Community Business” (QALICB or “Qualifying Project”) Generally have term of 7 years Debt or equity with better-than-market terms Potential for partial forgiveness by CDE at end of Year 7 17 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Who has NMTC Allocations? Competitively allocated at federal level Strong competition for the credit – demand exceeds supply by about 10 to 1 In 2008 round, 239 CDEs applied for credits and 70 received an allocation Average allocation award per CDE is $50 million Banks are the dominant recipients of credit to date City and state agencies Non-profits 18 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation NMTC Investors Type of Investors: Banks/Financial Institutions (e.g., US Bank, JPMorgan Chase, Capmark, Bank of America) Corporations (e.g., Target) With proper structuring, Investor can also play other roles in the transaction (lender, CDE, borrower) Credit begins to flow when investor makes the Qualified Equity Investment (QEI) 19 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Allocatees Nationally 115 Community Development Entities (CDEs) currently have NMTC allocations according to the Community Development Finance Institutions (CDFI) Fund 20 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Allocatees Serving Illinois Chicago Development Fund Citibank NMTC Corporation HEDC New Markets, Inc Hospitality Fund, II LLC Local Initiatives Support Corporation M&I New Markets Fund, LLC National City New Market Fund, Inc Urban Research Park CDE, LLC Chase New Markets Corporation Fifth Third New Markets Development Company LLC Gateway CDE LLC Related Community Development Group, LLC Urban Development Fund, LLC USBCDE, LLC 21 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation How Deals are Assembled Project Sponsor identifies a CDE (or Investor) and submits project proposal CDEs have differing geographic service areas and targeted project types CDE typically will assist in identifying the Investor or vice versa Possible to have multiple CDEs for larger projects, but it will drive up transaction costs Find out CDE and Investor fees up-front. Average fees for 2008 allocatees were 6.75% for for-profit allocatees and 7.25% for non-profit allocatees Expect Investors to be looking for IRR at 7-9% on non-profit deals and 8.5-10% on for-profit deals $4MM or larger transactions with high community impact are most attractive to CDEs and Investors 22 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Imperial Zinc Applicant : Manufacturer of zinc anodes and alloys Project: 80,000-squarefoot production facility to replace building destroyed by fire in March 2008. Project will allow for expansion into two new product lines. Location: 103rd Street & Woodlawn Avenue, Pullman Community Area 23 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Sample $10 Million Deal Lender Interest-Only Debt Service w/Balloon In Year 7 7-Year Loan at Conventional Market Terms ($7-$7.5MM) Cash Up-Front ($2.5-$3MM) NMTC Investor 24 Tax Credit Benefits ($3.9 MM over 7 Yrs) 7-Year Mini-Perm Loan @ Low Blended Rate ($9.5MM) QALICB (Project) CDE $500k in CDE fees and other transaction costs (placeholder amt) Sinking Fund for Loan Repayment Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Year 7 Lender Principal Repayment ($7-$7.5MM) Principal Repayment ($7-$7.5MM) QALICB (Project) CDE NMTC Investor Remaining $2-$2.5MM can be forgiven or restructured Return on and of capital provided via tax credits 25 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation CSTLC/Homan Henry Ford Learning Institute Charter high school at Homan Square in Lawndale $41 million project with $22 million of NMTC allocation LEED Gold Historic rehab 450-500 students NMTCs used to make lowinterest forgivable loans 26 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Sample “Non-Economic” Deal Charitable Donations $5MM Loan QLICI Government Grant $2MM Loan Investment $10MM Fund QEI CDE Nominal Interest Loan ($9.5MM) QALICB (Project) $3MM Equity NMTC Investor 27 Tax Credit Benefits ($3.9 MM over 7 Yrs) •$500k in CDE fees and other transaction costs (placeholder amt) Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Year 7 Unwind Charitable Donations Government Grant No Repayment Needed- Loans Can be Forgiven CDE Loan Can be Forgiven ($9.5MM) QALICB (Project) NMTC Investor Return on and of capital provided via tax credits 28 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation NMTC Structure with For-Sale Housing Lender Construction Loan Disbursements 7-Year Loan ($7MM) $3MM Equity Investment NMTC Investor Investment Fund $10MM QEI CDE $9.5MM Revolver Principal Payments w/Sales Proceeds Tax Credit Benefits ($3.9 MM over 7 Yrs) Construction Home Builder (QALICB) Sales Proceeds Home In QCT Home In QCT •Principal must stay at CDE level or below for 7-year NMTC compliance period •CDE must re-deploy repaid principal within 1 year 29 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Use of Condo Structure to Combine LIHTC & NMTC With careful structuring, can create mixed-use building with an NMTC-financed transaction: NMTC-financed commercial/community facility transaction on lower floors LIHTC-financed affordable rental transaction on upper floors Requires division of ownership between the two deals within the same building 30 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation States May Create Piggy-Back Credits: Example -- New Illinois NMTC Limit allocations to amount that will result in max of $10M of tax credits in any fiscal year Follows Federal program with a couple of exceptions: Excludes businesses that derive 15% or more of annual revenue from rental or for-sale real estate (carve-out for sponsor lease so long as sponsor passes test) 7-year credit percentages are different split QEI can be debt or equity Max QLICI to any one entity and its affiliates is $10MM Small and shallow state credit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 $0.00 $0.00 $0.07 $0.08 $0.08 $0.08 $0.08 TOTAL VALUE OVER 7 YEARS = $0.39 QEI for federal purposes can also be considered QEI for state NMTC purposes 31 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation 3. Low Income Housing Tax Credits The Workhorse Created in 1986 Credits Allocated to States Per Capita Allocated Using QAP to Developers 9% (+/-) of Eligible Basis for 10 Years Sold to Investors $.70 to $.90 4% Option With Bonds 30 Year Restriction to Low Income 32 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Lasagna Financing Tax Credits (assuming 9% credits) typically are between 60% and 70% of total development costs. The 60 70% swing ultimately depends on credit pricing and/or if the applicant gets the full amount of credits requested. First mortgages are typically 10% of TDC or less. The rest could be just about anything. 33 Assuming a $20M deal: LIHTC Yield Home Funds First Mortgage Other Soft $ TIF $13M $2M $1.5M $2M $1.5M Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation The Process Application Issues State Housing Agencies Developer Compensation is Upfront with Limited Qualified Allocation Plan Ongoing Cash Flow Competitive Process Bank and Corporate Buyers Multiple Financing Sources Out of Market Local Support Stimulus Provides Treasury Site Control Window and Added Gap Significant upfront effort to The Program for New prepare competitive application Affordable Housing Will Increase in Importance 34 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation 4. The Local Tool Kit Tax Incremental Financing Business Improvement Districts Other Tools Sales Tax Sharing Special Assessments Infrastructure Bonding 35 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Tax Incremental Financing 36 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation TIF in Virtually All States 37 TIF exists in 49 states and Washington D.C. Only Arizona does not have TIF legislation TIF, TAD, RAD, TIRZ… Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation But the Midwest is the Leader… 38 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Tax Incremental Financing , Cont’d Criteria Vary by State 1.5-Acre Minimum (IL) Blight and Conservation Factors But For… Industrial and Special Vacant Land Factors Maximum Length of District Usual Factors 39 50% over 35 years Deterioration Dilapidation Excessive Vacancy Lack of Growth of EAV Environmental Contamination Deleterious Land Use or Layout Obsolescence Code Others Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Uses of TIF Funds: Vary by State Property Assembly/Site Preparation/Remediation or Capping of Contaminated Soils Relocation Rehabilitation, Reconstruction, Repair, or Remodeling of Existing Structures Low-income Housing Construction Public Works or Improvements (Including Parking Facilities) Interest Subsidy Studies, Surveys, Planning, Legal, Consulting, and Administration Job Training/Welfare to Work Day Care 40 Financing Costs Taxing Districts’ Capital Costs Payment in Lieu of Taxes School and Library Costs Park Improvements Hiking and Biking Trails Pedestrian Pathways and Bridges Facilitating Intermodal Transportation Pedestrian Platforms at Transit Stations Public Golf Courses and Buildings Hospitals Community Colleges Convention Centers Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Range of TIF Projects Manpower Bryn Mawr/Belle Shore Block 37/Lowes Hotel Uptown at Park Ridge 41 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Deal Criteria and Process Criteria District creation varies Financing gap Formal application Extraordinary costs Weak market High risk Competitive locations Project increment vs. District increment Leverage 42 Process Market Gap Analysis Increment Projections Ownership Review Underwriting of pro forma Public review Review of parties Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Structure and Funding Structure Grants Junior Mortgage Loans Clawbacks Cessation of Payments Funding Methods Front Funding from Balances Alternate Revenue Bonds (G.O. Backed) Special Revenue Bonds Developer Notes 43 Sold at Discount Held Annual Payments Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation 44 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Business Improvement Districts Special Districts Providing Special Services or Infrastructure Additional Tax Results in Complex Approvals Both Urban and Greenfield A Rose by Any Other Name…. 45 Business Improvement Districts Business Development Districts Special Service Areas Community Improvement District Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation BIDs and Their Cousins Parameters Designated Sub-area of Community Additional Tax to Pay for Facilities or Services beyond Usual Downtown District Improvements & Marketing Greenfield Infrastructure Back-up for Owner’s Associations 51% of Owners & Electors Can Block 46 Issues and Concerns Tax Rates (Commercial Districts: .5% To 1.0% Typical) Shifting Infrastructure Costs – Windfall Profits? Subsequent Owner Disclosure Equity Issues But Can Be Useful Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Two Broad Uses Business Districts Special Streetscape and Lighting Marketing and Promotions Security/Concierge Additional Cleaning and Snow Removal Special Events Festivals Small Tax Rate (1%) 47 Greenfield Infrastructure Streets, Water, and Sewer Stormwater facilities Parks and Open Space Improvements Other Typical Subdivision Improvements Dedicated or Granted to Public Substantial Tax Rate (May be ½ up to Equal Other Property Tax) Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Back-up for Property Owner Associations Obligations Maintain public infrastructure Maintain open space Maintain stormwater facilities Other responsibilities in which there is a public right or responsibility assumed by POA 48 Reasons for Failure Disagreement Economic distress of members Refusal of some to pay Allows Public Sector to Step In and Levy Tax to Pay for Missed Obligation Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Other Examples New York City: 60 BIDs; $80 Million Alliance for Downtown New York Serves the Wall Street financial district; provides supplemental security and sanitation; economic development; streetscape, design and transportation services Center City District in Philadelphia Encompasses 120 blocks and more than 4,500 individual properties; provides sidewalk cleaning, graffiti removal, landscape maintenance, crime prevention, and advertising and promotion Downtown D.C. Approximately 140 blocks and 825 properties; provides services for hospitality, safety, maintenance, public space programming, streetscape, homeless services, and so on Hollywood Entertainment District Spans an18-block stretch of Hollywood Boulevard and is funded by 225 property owners; provides security, cleaning, and marketing services Historic Third Ward Association in Milwaukee Includes over 350 business and 400 residences; focused on converting various manufacturing and warehousing structures into commercial and residential uses Downtown BID in Grand Rapids Located in the Heart of Downtown Grand Rapids; focuses on maintenance and beautification, business development, event programming, and marketing 49 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Other Variants Business Development District Missouri and Illinois Blighted Areas Additional Taxes in Area Only Differing Revenue Sources An Interest in Land (MI) Ad Valorem Tax (IL and Others) Hotel Tax Sales Tax If it is a property tax, it is likely to be deductible from Federal Income Tax 50 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Other Tools: Sales Tax Sharing Parameters Available in Some States Where a Portion of Sales Tax Returned to Point of Origin Compete for STGs 51 Auto Dealers Shopping Centers Large Appliance/Electronic Stores Big-box Stores Form of Rebate Share of Increase Sometimes Net Impact on Other Stores Time Limits Dollar Limits Sometimes Linked to Extraordinary Costs Often Linked to Major Investment Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Sales Tax Sharing, Cont’d Sales Tax Sharing Assumptions Inflation Sales Tax Rate NPV Discount Rate Occupancy Factor for Non-Anchors 3.0% 1.0% 10.0% 90.0% Sales Generation Big-box-anchored 380,000 S.F. Shopping Center Developer Requested Approximately $5.8 Million in Municipal Assistance Recovery Period for Sharing % Scenarios 100% 8 Years 75% 11 Years 50% 21 Years 52 Sales psf Sales Area Anchor 1 [1] $ 422.00 203,091 Anchor 2 [1] $ 268.00 88,248 Non-Anchor [2] $ 195.00 71,022 Pads [2] $ 195.00 20,000 [1] Based on annual reports. [2] Based on Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers . Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Anchor 1 Sales [1] 57,136,268 85,704,402 88,275,534 90,923,800 93,651,514 96,461,060 99,354,891 102,335,538 105,405,604 108,567,772 111,824,805 115,179,550 118,634,936 122,193,984 125,859,804 129,635,598 133,524,666 137,530,406 141,656,318 145,906,007 150,283,188 154,791,683 159,435,434 164,218,497 Anchor 2 Sales [1] 15,766,976 23,650,464 24,359,978 25,090,777 25,843,501 26,618,806 27,417,370 28,239,891 29,087,088 29,959,700 30,858,491 31,784,246 32,737,773 33,719,907 34,731,504 35,773,449 36,846,652 37,952,052 39,090,613 40,263,332 41,471,232 42,715,369 43,996,830 45,316,735 Non-Anchor Sales [2] 6,232,181 9,348,271 12,464,361 12,838,292 13,223,441 13,620,144 14,028,748 14,449,611 14,883,099 15,329,592 15,789,480 16,263,164 16,751,059 17,253,591 17,771,198 18,304,334 18,853,464 19,419,068 20,001,640 20,601,690 21,219,740 21,856,332 22,512,022 23,187,383 Pads Total Sales [2] Sales 1,755,000 80,890,425 2,632,500 121,335,637 3,510,000 128,609,873 3,615,300 132,468,169 3,723,759 136,442,214 3,835,472 140,535,481 3,950,536 144,751,545 4,069,052 149,094,091 4,191,124 153,566,914 4,316,857 158,173,922 4,446,363 162,919,139 4,579,754 167,806,713 4,717,146 172,840,915 4,858,661 178,026,142 5,004,421 183,366,927 5,154,553 188,867,934 5,309,190 194,533,972 5,468,466 200,369,992 5,632,520 206,381,091 5,801,495 212,572,524 5,975,540 218,949,700 6,154,806 225,518,191 6,339,450 232,283,736 6,529,634 239,252,249 TOTAL 2005-2029 NPV 2005-2029 PV @ 10% 2005- 100% Sales Tax 808,904 1,213,356 1,286,099 1,324,682 1,364,422 1,405,355 1,447,515 1,490,941 1,535,669 1,581,739 1,629,191 1,678,067 1,728,409 1,780,261 1,833,669 1,888,679 1,945,340 2,003,700 2,063,811 2,125,725 2,189,497 2,255,182 2,322,837 2,392,522 41,295,575 12,134,702 6,080,005 75% Sharing 606,678 910,017 964,574 993,511 1,023,317 1,054,016 1,085,637 1,118,206 1,151,752 1,186,304 1,221,894 1,258,550 1,296,307 1,335,196 1,375,252 1,416,510 1,459,005 1,502,775 1,547,858 1,594,294 1,642,123 1,691,386 1,742,128 1,794,392 30,971,681 9,101,027 5,809,180 50% Sharing 404,452 606,678 643,049 662,341 682,211 702,677 723,758 745,470 767,835 790,870 814,596 839,034 864,205 890,131 916,835 944,340 972,670 1,001,850 1,031,905 1,062,863 1,094,748 1,127,591 1,161,419 1,196,261 20,647,787 6,067,351 5,713,100 Note: Shaded portions of columns represent recovery period. [1] Anchors phased in at 67% in first year of operations, 100% in second year of operations. [2] Non-Anchors phased in at 50% in first year of operations, 75% in second year of operation, 100% in third year of operations. Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Other Infrastructure Tools Special Assessments Traditional Tool Assessment Based on Benefit Court Process in IL Key Role for Appraisers Methods Vary – Historically Lineal Lien on Property Not Tax Deductible 53 Infrastructure Bonding Omnibus Approach Special Sales Tax in IL; Likely Variants Elsewhere Can be Combined Developer Payments Impact Fees SSA Type Vehicles Recapture Agreements Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation In Closing… Stimulus Should Provide Opportunities and Turnaround Public Project Opportunities Accelerated A Complex Tool Kit To Close Gaps Through Public-Private Partnerships 54 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation Real Estate Economics Public-Private Partnerships Developer Solicitation Development Management Public Financing Area Plans & Implementation Fiscal & Economic Impact 221 North LaSalle Street Suite 820 Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 424-4250 www.friedmanco.com 55 Vision | Economics | Strategy | Finance | Implementation