Behavioral Consultation Gemma Minetti California

advertisement

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Problem Description

 K is a six year old first grade student in

Mrs.

P’s general education classroom. K often thinks he knows the answers to Mrs.

P’s verbally asked questions; however, he neglects to raise his hand and wait to be called upon to speak. Instead, K blurts out answers and does not give other students a chance to raise their hand and answer questions.

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Operational Definition and

Dimension of Behavior

 Blurting Out: K will blurt out responses without raising his hand and waiting to be called upon to speak. (excessive)

 Decrease Frequency

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Background Information

 K lives in Chico with his two younger brothers, father, and mother, who is pregnant with his younger sister.

 He enjoys playing soccer and Wii.

 His favorite subject in school is math.

 He also likes to play games and climb trees.

Mrs. P described K as a “pleaser” who is extremely helpful and full of energy.

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Class Schedule: Monday- Thursday

Time

8:30-9:00

9:00-9:55

9:55-10:15

10:15-11:40

11:40-12:30

12:30-12:45

12:45-1:20

1:20-1:30

1:30-2:20

2:20-2:25

Interval (minutes)

30

55

20

85

50

15

35

10

50

5

Activity

Community Time

Word Work

Recess

Reading Groups

Lunch/Recess

Story Time

Language Arts

Recess

Math

Clean Up

Collect data

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Antecedent

Everyday

Math/ Pick Up prompted to raise hand

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Behavior Consequence verbal warning

Code redirection blurting out raises hand move clip down to

“Warning” punishment move clip down to

“Teacher's

Choice” lose 5 minutes of recess punishment response cost verbal praise move clip up to

“Wow” move clip up to

“Good Call Home” positive reinforcement

Mrs. P’s Clip Chart

Good Phone

Call Home

WOW!

All Star Student

Warning

Teacher’s

Choice

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Data Sheet

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Baseline Data

4

3

6

5

2

1

0

12

11

10

9

8

7

1 2

M= 6; SD= 4.2

3

Day

4

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

5

Blurting

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Procedure:

Differential

Reinforcement of

Limited Responding.

Everyday

Math.

Mrs. P asks a question.

3

4

1

2

5

6

Phase Blurts

Allowed

4

3

4

5*

2

1

New Interval

Begins

(Interval= 25 minutes).

K has X or less blurt outs.

K is immediately reinforced with a prize and verbal praise from Mrs. P.

K has X or more blurt outs.

K is not reinforced.

*Increased based on Phase 1 data

.

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Intervention Procedure: Phase 1

 Differential Reinforcement of Limited

Responding.

 Decrease Blurting.

○ 25 minute interval began.

 K was reinforced for 4 or less instances of blurting in the 25 minute interval.

K was immediately reinforced with a prize and verbal praise from Mrs. P as soon as the 25 minute interval ended.

 K was not reinforced if he had 5 or more instances of blurting in the 25 minute interval.

○ A new 25 minute interval began.

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Intervention Implementation Data Sheet: Phase 1

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Intervention: Phase 1

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

9

8

7

12

11

10

M= 8.4; SD= 3.6

6 7 8

Day

9

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Blurting

Criterion

10

Total Collection

Time= 50 minutes.

Intervention Procedure: Phase 2

 Differential Reinforcement of Limited

Responding.

Decrease Blurting.

○ 25 minute interval began.

 K was reinforced for 5 or less instances of blurting in a

25 minute interval.

K was immediately reinforced with a prize and verbal praise from Mrs. P as soon as the 25 minute interval ended.

K was not reinforced if he had 6 or more instances of blurting in the 25 minute interval.

A new 25 minute interval began.

A visual was added to K’s desk to illustrate how many instances of blurting he was allowed in the

25 minute interval.

 Mrs. P marked the designated number every time K blurted.

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Desk Visual

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Intervention Data: Blurting

7

Phase 1 Phase 2

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

6 7 8 9

Day

10 11 12

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

1st Interval

M= 4.4; SD= 2.1

2nd Interval

M= 3 ; SD= 2

Criterion

Interval= 25 minutes.

Baseline and Intervention Data: Blurting

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

M= 6;

SD= 4.2

M= 8.4;

SD= 3.6

M= 5;

SD= 4.2

Criterion

Trend

(Based on median data)

0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

Baseline Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Phase 6

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Day

Data points represent the total amount of blurts from

Interval 1 and

Interval 2.

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Program Efficacy

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

Baseline

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

16.7% decrease

Phase 2

Blurting

Plan Efficacy

K’s blurting behavior decreased from baseline to the current phase by 16.7%, which means he has blurted on an average of 5 times in one 25 minute interval rather than 6 times.

 His blurting behavior from baseline to the current phase still varies at a rate of

4.2.

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Goals

 The goal of maintenance is to keep the behavior occurring at a low rate after the intervention has been removed.

 The goal of generalization is to have the behavior occur at low rates in other antecedents.

 Specifically for K, we want him to blurt at low rates and only receive the reinforcers his classmates receive, as well as blurt at low rates in all class periods.

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Procedure

 Phase 2 of K’s DRL procedure will continue until he meets the criterion for three consecutive days.

 The procedure will continue up to Phase 6.

○ K’s visual prompt on his desk will decrease to only show the number of blurts allowed in each phase.

 The visual will be completely removed once the reinforcement schedule moves from continuous to intermittent.

Phase

2

3

4

5

6

Days

Required at

Criterion

5

5

5

5

10

Blurts

Allowed in Each

25 Minute

Interval

5

4

3

2

1

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Data Sheets

Phase 3

Phase 4

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Data Sheets

Phase 5

Phase 6

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Desk Visual: Fading

Phase 3

Phase 4

Phase 5

Phase 6

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Procedure

Maintenance: K’s blurting behavior must remain at criterion in Phase 6 for a period of 10 days in order to move into generalization.

Generalization: K’s reinforcement schedule will move from continuous to intermittent.

 Continuous= K was being reinforced after each

25 minute interval if he met the designated criteria.

 Intermittent= K will only be reinforced occasionally after each 25 minute interval, even if he meets the criteria for reinforcement every time.

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Intermittent Reinforcement Schedule

3

4

1

2

5

Day Interval 1

Interval 2

Reinforce if criterion is met.

Do not reinforce, even if criterion is met.

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Maintenance

 K will only be reinforced if he remains at criterion, which is 2 or fewer blurts in the total 50 minute period.

 K will be reinforced if he meets the designated criteria immediately once the 50 minute period ends.

Day

6

7

8

9

10

Reinforcement

Schedule

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Generalization

 After maintenance, K’s reinforcers will be thinned each week.

 Week 1 : K will be reinforced with verbal praise, moving his clip up the chart, and a prize from

Mrs. P’s prize box every time he meets criterion.

 Week 2 : K will be reinforced with verbal praise paired with moving his clip up the chart every time he meets criterion.

 Week 3: K will be reinforced with verbal praise paired with moving his clip up the chart intermittently.

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Questions or Comments:

© Gemma Minetti, 2014

Download