Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services into Foresight Models 7-8 May 2015, Bioversity, Rome DAHBSIM, a Dynamic Agricultural Household BioEconomic Simulation Model Theoretical and methodological issues regarding bio-economic model ________________________________________________________________________________ Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services into Foresight Models 7-8 May 2015, Bioversity - Rome G. Flichman 1 DAHBSIM TEAM Coordination: Guillermo Flichman (a) Model code development: María Blanco (b)*; Sophie Drogué **(c) Agronomic modeling: Hatem Belhouchette (a), Roza Chenoune (a), Wajid Nasim (a) Livestock module: Adam Komarek (d), James Hawkins (d) Household Typology: Roza Chenoune and Loubna El Ansari (a) ---------------------------- DAHBSIM is part of IFPRI BioSight Project, coordinated by Siwa Msangi __________________________________________________________ (a) Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomiques Méditerranéennes Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier (b) Universidad Politécnica de Madrid-Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos (c) Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UMR MOISA. (d) International Food Policy Research Institute * in 2014; **after January 2015 ________________________________________________________________________________ Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services into Foresight Models 7-8 May 2015, Bioversity - Rome G. Flichman 2 DAHBSIM TEAM The DAHBSIM team participated in the development of several bio-economic models. The most relevant are: Cebalat Model: A recursive stochastic supply model (1) FSSIM-MP: static, generic, positive, supply model (2) FSSIM-DEV: static, generic, positive household model (3) DAHBSIM has combined characteristics of these previous models and new features (1) Blanco M.Belhouchette H. Flichman G. (2012) (2) Louhichi K.,Belhouchette H.Blanco M.,Flichman G. et al ( 2010) (3) Louhichi K. Belhouchette H., Blanco M., Flichman G. et al (2013) ________________________________________________________________________________ Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services into Foresight Models 7-8 May 2015, Bioversity - Rome G. Flichman 3 Principal characteristics of DAHBSIM The production “side” of the model : Based on the representation of activities: production processes The demand “side” of the model : Based on a demand function. The model applies the hypothesis of non-separability of production and consumption decisions as well as allocation of available household labor: this is reflected in the objective function. Dynamics are based on a re-initialization of soil conditions after each iteration, allowing to evaluate the sustainability of the system in term of natural resources ________________________________________________________________________________ Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services into Foresight Models 7-8 May 2015, Bioversity - Rome G. Flichman 4 Activities and Products (2) The diagram shows the causal relationships implied in this type of model. “Products” (wheat, straw, NO3 emissions…) are outputs of the activities. One activity (or production process) has several outputs – joint production One product can be produced by several activities Considers positive and negative jointness associated to the production process It permits assessing in an integrated manner policies linked as well to products as to production processes ________________________________________________________________________________ Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services into Foresight Models 7-8 May 2015, Bioversity - Rome G. Flichman 5 Activities and Products (3) The above diagram represents an input-output linear vector concerning one single production activity. ________________________________________________________________________________ Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services into Foresight Models 7-8 May 2015, Bioversity - Rome G. Flichman 6 Joint products in DAHBSIM Two types of joint products can be considered: Those that can be source of externalities (positive or negative) Those that are consequence of the production process and will affect production on time In the first type we consider all type of emissions (nitrate and pesticides pollution, GHG emissions as well as impacts on biodiversity, on nutrition, etc. In the second case we consider impacts of production processes in period t that change the conditions for the production in period t+1 The change in state variables implied in the second case will influence the production (including all joint products) in the following periods. HOW CAN WE BETTER CAPTURE THESE ISSUES ? Developing feed-backs between the economic and the agronomic processes ________________________________________________________________________________ Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services into Foresight Models 7-8 May 2015, Bioversity - Rome G. Flichman 7 Dynamics in DAHBSIM Dahbsim has intertemporal and recursive dynamics. Intertemporal because equations are indexed over years and the decision of households are optimized given a discounted utility. Recursive because the year-1’s results obtained at the end of the first simulation feed the next simulation and so on. Yields obtained at the end of the first (intertemporal) simulation are multiplied by the biophysical stress coefficient which increase or decrease the yields in the next (intertemporal) simulation depending on the effects the precedent crop produces on the state of the soil (water an N content) . This procedure allows a proper consideration of livestock, perennial crops, investment as well as the possibility of feed-backs between the optimization decisions and their impact on the natural resources conditions, affecting as well production as all kind of joint products (sources of externalities included) ________________________________________________________________________________ Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services into Foresight Models 7-8 May 2015, Bioversity - Rome G. Flichman 8 Feed-back between agronomic and economic modules First option, (Barbier et al,1999) is to run a biophysical model, include the results in a first run of recursive-dynamic optimization model, take the results of the first period, run again the biophysical model, modify the initial conditions of the dynamic model run it again and so on. It was not a generic model Second option, (Blanco et al 2012) --- is a meta-modeling approach. Out of simulations with a biophysical model, a simpler model is estimated and this meta-model is included in the code of the bio-economic model allowing the reinitialization of the initial conditions for the simulations done for t+1 periods and so on. The meta-model is not generic Third option, (Holden et al 2005) the model includes a biophysical module and the optimization is performed in an intertemporal loop. The biophysical module is built out of information of the specific site. It is not a generic model ________________________________________________________________________________ Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services into Foresight Models 7-8 May 2015, Bioversity - Rome G. Flichman 9 Third option, the Dynamics of DAHBSIM DAHBSIM applies a Dynamic-recursive optimization approach: An inter-temporal optimization is performed over t years moving time horizon First year’s results are retained and recursive calculations (Summary biophysical model) are introduced before the second optimization, for taking into account the effects on resources of the previous year choices. The intertemporal optimization allows dealing with multiannual activities (perennial crops, livestock), investment and credit, This procedure is repeated for all periods (recursive loop). Water and nitrogen contents of the soil are reinitialized before the following inter-temporal optimization and level of outputs related with each activity changes (as well the yields as the joint products) ________________________________________________________________________________ Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services into Foresight Models 7-8 May 2015, Bioversity - Rome G. Flichman 10 Structure of the model (1) At the actual stage of development DAHBSIM contains: – Objective Function: The basic assumption is that production, consumption and labor allocation choices are made simultaneously. It maximizes present value of a stream of full income: value of sales plus self consumption and revenue obtained from off-farm activities minus costs. Risk is taken into account using the mean-standard deviation approach. – The biophysical module re-initialize the soil conditions as a consequence of crop pattern choice in the previous iteration – The crop module contains the equations describing the cropland allocation, the labor use, the rotation constraints, etc. ________________________________________________________________________________ Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services into Foresight Models 7-8 May 2015, Bioversity - Rome G. Flichman 11 Structure of the model (2) – The farm module contains the equations defining the resources constraints and several balances concerning seeds, food products, labor use, etc. – The household module contains the equations defining household demand and time allocation as well as the demand function ________________________________________________________________________________ Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services into Foresight Models 7-8 May 2015, Bioversity - Rome G. Flichman 12 Structure of the model (3) • The livestock module describes the animal activities and calculate manure supply – potential fertilizer that can go to crop production and well as feed demand – potentially supplied by crops and crop residues • The following modules will be developed in the next months: – Investment and credit – Perennial crops – Calibration – Risk ________________________________________________________________________________ Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services into Foresight Models 7-8 May 2015, Bioversity - Rome G. Flichman 13 Structure of the model (4) • The consumption function – The Rotterdam demand function will be applied – We will use the elasticities of consumption goods for Malawi estimated by Ecker and Quaim (2010) for a large number of food and non-food products and also for nutrients using information consistent with our data. – The cross-elasticities are not available, but we will apply the procedure developed by Beguin, Bureau and Drogué (2003) for obtaining also an estimation of cross elasticities. ________________________________________________________________________________ Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services into Foresight Models 7-8 May 2015, Bioversity - Rome G. Flichman 14 Simplified DAHBSIM scheme for cropping activities Regional data, observed by soil type on plots allow defining cropping activities Household endowments: available land, labor, equipment per Household or Household Type Definition of constraints Costs, prices of inputs and outputs of activities and consumption goods Definition of activities as input output vectors OBJECTIVE FUNCTION Demand function Intertemporal Optimization from T1…T10 Soil pattern at T1 provides information on water and N content for a new run of the biophysical module Intertemporal Optimization from T2…T11 Activities’vectors are redefined out of biophysical simulations And so on up to T10…T19 ________________________________________________________________________________ Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services into Foresight Models 7-8 May 2015, Bioversity - Rome G. Flichman 15 Simplified scheme of the Biophysical module THIS CALCULATION IS PERFORMED AFTER EACH ITERATION ON THE DIFFERENT SOIL TYPES. THE WATER AND NITROGEN CONTENT IN THE SOIL IS A RESULT OF THE PREVIOUS CROP IN T-1 RUN + FERTILIZATION AND IRRIGATION IN T1 Crop Coefficient (Kc) Weather PM-ET0 Crop potential evapotranspiration Rainfall Irrigation Soil water Drainage Water limited crop evapotranspiration Potential crop evapotranspirationdependent yield Actual to potential evapotranspiration Evapotranspiration limited yield N residue N fertilization Organic fertilization Nitrogen limited yield Actual yield (minimum of the two calculations) ________________________________________________________________________________ Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services into Foresight Models 7-8 May 2015, Bioversity - Rome G. Flichman Soil N N Leaching 16 Data Issues We have access to a very complete Database (*). But … several problems appear concerning the organization of data for DAHBSIM DATA structure used by DAHBSIM has two principal entries: Information belonging to each Household Information related with production processes (activities) The model is applied on average HHs defined out of a typology (cluster analysis, hierarchical classification) ____________________________________________ (*) Information provided by the Africa RISING M&E Team, IFPRI. C. Azzari, C. Roberts and H. Beliyou ________________________________________________________________________________ Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services into Foresight Models 7-8 May 2015, Bioversity - Rome G. Flichman 17 Indicators that can be obtained from DAHBSIM Socio-economic Labor use, discriminated by gender Income, from hh production, from off-farm activities Environmental Emissions of GHG, NO3, water use Soil fertility Nutrition conditions Calories, and nutrients consumption Biodiversity Possible only if change in land used for production allows to build an indicator. It could be also possible to simulate expansion of the cultivated land and impacts on biodiversity, depending on available information ________________________________________________________________________________ Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services into Foresight Models 7-8 May 2015, Bioversity - Rome G. Flichman 18 References Belhouchette H., Blanco M., Wery J., Flichman G. (2012). Use of a bio-economic model to assess the sustainability of irrigated farming systems: a case study in the Cebalat region in Tunisia. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. Louhichi, K., Gomez y Paloma, S., Belhouchette,H., Allen,T., Fabre, J., Blanco,M.,Chenoune, R., Acs,S.,Flichman,G. (2012). Modelling Agri-Food Policy Impact at Farm-Household Level in Developing Countries (FSSIM-DEV). Application to Sierra Leone. Publisher: EC-JRC-IPTS, Editor: Kamel Louhichi & Sergio Gomez y Paloma, ISBN: 97892-79-29826-4 (European Commission, JRC Scientific and Policy Reports Louhichi,K.,Kanellopoulos,A.,Janssen,S.,Flichman,G.,Blanco,M.,Hengsdijk,H.,Heckelei,T.,Berentsen,P.,Lansink,A., Van Ittersum,M. (2010). FSSIM, a bio-economic farm model for simulating the response of EU farming systems to agricultural and environmental policies. Agricultural Systems, 10/2010; 103(8). Flichman, G., Louhichi,K., Boisson, JM, Modelling the Relationship Between Agriculture and the Environment using Bio-Economic Models: Some Conceptual issues. In Bio-Economic Models applied to Agricultural Systems. Springer 2011.(3-14) Blanco, M., Flichman, G., Belhouchette, H. Dynamic Optimisation Problems: Different Resolution Methods Regarding Agriculture and Natural Resource Economics. . In Bio-Economic Models applied to Agricultural Systems. Springer 2011.(29-57) Holden,S., Shiferaw,B., Pender,J. Policy Analysis for Sustainable Land Management and Food Security in Ethiopia. A Bioeconomic Model with Market Imperfections. Research Report 140, IFPRI, 2005. Beguin, J., Bureau, JC and Drogué, S. The calibration of Incomplete Demand Systems in Quantitative Analysis . Applied Economics, 2004/5/10. Ecker, O.& Qaim,M Analyzing Nutritional Impacts of Policies. IFPRI Discussion Paper 01017, 2010. ________________________________________________________________________________ Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services into Foresight Models 7-8 May 2015, Bioversity - Rome G. Flichman 19