Social Discount Rate 12-706 / 19-702 Admin Issues Schedule changes: No Friday recitation – will do in class Monday Pipeline case study writeup – still Monday Format expectations: Framing of problem (see p. 7!), Answer/justify with preliminary calculations Don’t just estimate the answer! Do not need to submit an excel printout, but feel free to paste a table into a document Length: Less than 2 pages. Real and Nominal Values Nominal: ‘current’ or historical data Real: ‘constant’ or adjusted data Use deflator or price index for real Generally “Real” has had inflation/price changes factored in and nominal has not For investment problems: If B&C in real dollars, use real disc rate If B&C in nominal dollars, use nominal rate Both methods will give the same answer Similar to Real/Nominal : Foreign Exchange Rates / PPP Big Mac handout Common Definition of inputs Should be able to compare cost across countries Interesting results? Why? What are limitations? Is it worth to spend $1 million today to save a life 10 years from now? How about spending $1 million today so that your grandchildren can have a lifestyle similar to yours? RFF Discounting Handout How much do/should we care about people born after we die? Ethically, no one’s interests should count more than another’s: “Equal Standing” Social Discount Rate Rate used to make investment decisions for society Most people tend to prefer current, rather than future, consumption Marginal rate of time preference (MRTP) Face opportunity cost (of foregone interest) when we spend not save Marginal rate of investment return Intergenerational effects We have tended to discuss only short term investment analyses (e.g. 5 yrs) Economists agree that discounting should be done for public projects Do not agree on positive discount rate Government Discount Rates US Government Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-94 http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a09 4/a094.html Discusses how to do BCA and related performance studies What discount, inflation, etc. rates to use Basically says “use this rate, but do sensitivity analysis with nearby rates” OMB Circular A-94, Appendix C Provides the current suggested values to use for federal government analyses http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a094/a94_appxc.html Revised yearly, usually “good until January of the next year” How would the government decide its discount rates? What is the government’s MARR? Historic Nominal Interest Rates (from OMB A-94) 2005 2006 3.7 4.7 4.1 4.8 4.4 4.9 4.6 5.0 5.2 5.2 Real Discount Rates (from A-94) 2005 2006 1.7 2.5 2.0 2.6 2.3 2.7 2.5 2.8 3.1 3.0 What do people think Cropper et al surveyed 3000 homes Asked about saving lives in the future Found a 4% discount rate for lives 100 years from now Hume’s Law Discounting issues are normative vs. positive battles Hume noted that facts alone cannot tell us what we should do Any recommendation embodies ethics and judgment E.g. focusing on ‘highest NPV’ implies net benefits is only goal for society If future generations will be better off than us anyway Then we might have no reason to make additional sacrifices There might be ‘special standing’ in addition to ‘equal standing’ Immediate relatives vs. distant relatives Different discount rates over time Why do we care so much about future and ignore some present needs (poverty) A Few More Questions Current government discount rates are ‘effectively zero’ What does this mean for projects and project selection decisions? What does it say about intergenerational effects? What are implications of zero or negative discount rates? Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Project Comprehensive project to restore natural water flow to the Florida Everglades. Enhance water supply to South Florida region. Provide continuous flood protection. See more info at http://www.evergladesplan.org/ Indian River Lagoon-South (IRLS) Part of Everglades Restoration Project. Total Cost of $1.21 billion. Annual Benefits of $159 million after project is completed in 2015. Find NPV of first 25 years of project. IRLS Cash Schedule $159 per year 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 $0.425 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 $2.043 $12.62 All values are in millions $447.3 $748.3 24 25 NPV of Project $0 3% 7% 20% -$100 NPV of Project (Millions) -$200 -$300 -$400 -$500 -$600 -$700 Discount Rate What would NPV be if we used a negative discount rate? NPV of Project $1,000 $800 $600 NPV of Project (Millions) $400 $200 $0 3% 7% 20% -$200 -$400 -$600 -$800 Discount Rate 0% -1% Borrowing, Depreciation, Taxes in Cash Flow Problems H. Scott Matthews 12-706 / 19-702 Theme: Cash Flows Streams of benefits (revenues) and costs over time => “cash flows” We need to know what to do with them in terms of finding NPV of projects Different perspectives: private and public We will start with private since its easier Why “private..both because they are usually of companies, and they tend not to make studies public Cash flows come from: operation, financing, taxes Without taxes, cash flows simple A = B - C Cash flow = benefits - costs Or.. Revenues - expenses Notes on Tax deductibility Reason we care about financing and depreciation: they affect taxes owed For personal income taxes, we deduct items like IRA contributions, mortgage interest, etc. Private entities (eg businesses) have similar rules: pay tax on net income Income = Revenues - Expenses There are several types of expenses that we care about Interest expense of borrowing Depreciation (can only do if own the asset) These are also called ‘tax shields’ Goal: Cash Flows after taxes (CFAT) Master equation conceptually: CFAT = -equity financed investment + gross income - operating expenses + salvage value taxes + (debt financing receipts disbursements) + equity financing receipts Where “taxes” = Tax Rate * Taxable Income Taxable Income = Gross Income - Operating Expenses - Depreciation - Loan Interest - Bond Dividends Most scenarios (and all problems we will look at) only deal with one or two of these issues at a time Investment types Debt financing: using a bank or investor’s money (loan or bond) DFD:disbursement (payments) DFR:receipts (income) DFI: portion tax deductible (only non-principal) Equity financing: using own money (no borrowing) Why Finance? Time shift revenues and expenses construction expenses paid up front, nuclear power plant decommissioning at end. “Finance” is also used to refer to plans to obtain sufficient revenue for a project. Borrowing Numerous arrangements possible: bonds and notes (pay dividends) bank loans and line of credit (pay interest) municipal bonds (with tax exempt interest) Lenders require a real return - borrowing interest rate exceeds inflation rate. Issues Security of loan - piece of equipment, construction, company, government. More security implies lower interest rate. Project, program or organization funding possible. (Note: role of “junk bonds” and rating agencies. Variable versus fixed interest rates: uncertainty in inflation rates encourages variable rates. Issues (cont.) Flexibility of loan - can loan be repaid early (makes re-finance attractive when interest rates drop). Issue of contingencies. Up-front expenses: lawyer fees, taxes, marketing bonds, etc.- 10% common Term of loan Source of funds Sinking Funds Act as reverse borrowing - save revenues to cover end-of-life costs to restore mined lands or decommission nuclear plants. Low risk investments are used, so return rate is lower. Recall: Annuities (a.k.a uniform values) Consider the PV of getting the same amount ($1) for many years Lottery pays $A / yr for n yrs at i=5% A A A A PV 1i (1i) .. 2 (1i)3 (1i)n A A A PV * (1 i) A (1i) (1i) .. 2 (1i)n1 ----- Subtract above 2 equations.. ------A PV * (1 i) PV A (1i) n n 1 PV *(i) A(1 (1i) ) A(1 (1 i) ) n PV A (1(1i) n ) i When A=1 the right hand side is called the “annuity factor” Uniform Values - Application Note Annual (A) values also sometimes referred to as Uniform (U) .. $1000 / year for 5 years example P = U*(P|U,i,n) = (P|U,5%,5) = 4.329 P = 1000*4.329 = $4,329 Relevance for loans? Borrowing Sometimes we don’t have the money to undertake - need to get loan i=specified interest rate At=cash flow at end of period t (+ for loan receipt, - for payments) Rt=loan balance at end of period t It=interest accrued during t for Rt-1 Qt=amount added to unpaid balance At t=n, loan balance must be zero Equations i=specified interest rate At=cash flow at end of period t (+ for loan receipt, - for payments) It=i * Rt-1 Qt= At + It Rt= Rt-1 + Qt <=> Rt= Rt-1 + At + It Rt= Rt-1 + At + (i * Rt-1) Annual, or Uniform, payments Assume a payment of U each year for n years on a principal of P Rn=-U[1+(1+i)+…+(1+i)n-1]+P(1+i)n Rn=-U[((1+i)n-1)/i] + P(1+i)n Uniform payment functions in Excel Same basic idea as earlier slide Example Borrow $200 at 10%, pay $115.24 at end of each of first 2 years R0=A0=$200 A1= -$115.24, I1=R0*i = (200)*(.10)=20 Q1=A1 + I1 = -95.24 R1=R0+Qt = 104.76 I2=10.48; Q2=-104.76; R2=0 Various Repayment Options Single Loan, Single payment at end of loan Single Loan, Yearly Payments Multiple Loans, One repayment Notes Mixed funds problem - buy computer Below: Operating cash flows At Four financing options (at 8%) in At section below t 0 1 2 3 4 5 At (Operation) -22,000 6,0 00 6,0 00 6,0 00 6,0 00 6,0 00 2,0 00 10,000 -14,693 At (Fin ancing) 10,000 10,000 -2,5 05 -800 -2,5 05 -800 -2,5 05 -800 -2,5 05 -800 -2,5 05 -10,800 10,000 -2,8 00 -2,6 40 -2,4 80 -2,3 20 -2,1 60 Further Analysis (still no tax) t At 8% (Opera tion ) 0 -22 ,000 1 6,000 2 6,000 3 6,000 4 6,000 5 6,000 2,000 NPV 33 17.4 27 10 ,000 -14 ,693 0.1911 At (Fi nancing at 8%) 10 ,000 10 ,000 -2,505 -80 0 -2,505 -80 0 -2,505 -80 0 -2,505 -80 0 -2,505 -10 ,800 -1.7386 0 10 ,000 -2,800 -2,640 -2,480 -2,320 -2,160 1E-1 2 -12 ,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 -8,693 2,000 33 17.6 2 A* (To tal pre-ta x) -12 ,000 -12 ,000 3,495 5,200 3,495 5,200 3,495 5,200 3,495 5,200 3,495 -4,800 2,000 2,000 33 15.6 9 33 17.4 MARR (disc rate) equals borrowing rate, so financing plans equivalent. When wholly funded by borrowing, can set MARR to interest rate -12 ,000 3,200 3,360 3,520 3,680 3,840 2,000 33 17.4 3 Effect of other MARRs (e.g. 10%) t At 10 % (Opera tion ) 0 -22 ,000 1 6,000 2 6,000 3 6,000 4 6,000 5 6,000 2,000 NPV 19 86.5 63 10 ,000 -14 ,693 87 6.8 At (Fi nancing at 8%) 10 ,000 10 ,000 -2,505 -80 0 -2,505 -80 0 -2,505 -80 0 -2,505 -80 0 -2,505 -10 ,800 50 4.08 75 8.16 10 ,000 -2,800 -2,640 -2,480 -2,320 -2,160 48 3.69 -12 ,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 -8,693 2,000 28 63.3 7 A* (To tal pre-ta x) -12 ,000 -12 ,000 3,495 5,200 3,495 5,200 3,495 5,200 3,495 5,200 3,495 -4,800 2,000 2,000 24 90.6 4 27 44.7 ‘Total’ NPV higher than operation alone for all options All preferable to ‘internal funding’ Why? These funds could earn 10% ! First option ‘gets most of loan’, is best -12 ,000 3,200 3,360 3,520 3,680 3,840 2,000 24 70.2 5 Effect of other MARRs (e.g. 6%) t At 6% (Opera tion ) 0 -22 ,000 1 6,000 2 6,000 3 6,000 4 6,000 5 6,000 2,000 NPV 47 68.6 99 -14 ,693 At (Fi nancing at 8%) 10 ,000 10 ,000 -2,505 -80 0 -2,505 -80 0 -2,505 -80 0 -2,505 -80 0 -2,505 -10 ,800 10 ,000 -2,800 -2,640 -2,480 -2,320 -2,160 -97 9.46 -55 1.97 -52 5.1 10 ,000 -84 2.5 -12 ,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 -8,693 2,000 37 89.2 3 A* (To tal pre-ta x) -12 ,000 -12 ,000 3,495 5,200 3,495 5,200 3,495 5,200 3,495 5,200 3,495 -4,800 2,000 2,000 42 16.7 3 39 26.2 Now reverse is true Why? Internal funds only earn 6% ! First option now worst -12 ,000 3,200 3,360 3,520 3,680 3,840 2,000 42 43.6 1