Pharmaceutical Development Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development with focus on Paediatric Formulations Protea Hotel Victoria Junction, Waterfront Cape Town, South Africa Date: 16 to 20 April 2007 | Slide 1 of 45 April 2007 Pharmaceutical Development Developing formulation and manufacturing process Presenter: János Pogány, pharmacist, PhD pogany.janos@chello.hu WHO expert | Slide 2 of 45 April 2007 Abbreviations API EoI FDC FPP GMP ICH MA PQP TRS Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Expression of Interest Fixed-Dose Combination Finished Pharmaceutical Product Good Manufacturing Practices International Conference on Harmonization Marketing Authorization PreQualification Project Technical Report Series of WHO Red → emphasis | Slide 3 of 45 Green → WHO April 2007 Violet → ICH region Pharmaceutical Development Outline and Objectives of presentation Objective, guidelines Literature and patent survey Generic pharmaceutical product and process development – assessors view of a science- and risk-based approach – – – – – Laboratory scale Pilot plant Production plant Presentation of dossier for prequalification Continuous improvement Main points again | Slide 4 of 45 April 2007 Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development with focus on Paediatric Formulations Objective, guidelines Interchangeability (IC) INTERCHANGEABILITY (IC) OF MULTISOURCE FPPs = THERAPEUTICAL EQUIVALENCE WITH A COMPARATOR (REFERENCE) FPP = PHARMACEUTICAL EQUIVALENCE (PE) + BIOEQUIVALENCE (BE) IC = PE + BE | Slide 6 of 45 April 2007 Pharmaceutical equivalence Products are pharmaceutical equivalents1 if they contain the – same molar amount of the same active pharmaceutical ingredient(s) – in the same dosage form – if they meet comparable standards, and – if they are intended to be administered by the same route 1 Pharmaceutical equivalence does not necessarily imply therapeutic equivalence, as differences in the excipients and/or the manufacturing process and some other variables can lead to differences in product performance. Pharmaceutical development equivalence, including stability equivalence (and packaging equivalence) WHO-GMP (manufacturing process equivalence) | Slide 7 of 45 April 2007 Focus on paediatric dosage forms Epivir (lamivudine) 10 mg/ml oral solution Retrovir (zidovudine) 100 mg/10 ml oral solution Sustiva (efavirenz) 30 mg/ml oral solution Viramune (nevirapine) 50 mg/5 ml oral suspension Zerit (stavudine) 200 mg powder for oral solution Powder for oral suspension, capsules, film-coated tablets and chocolate pastilles can also be considered Once safe and effective doses are established, generic FPPs can be developed and bioequivalence demonstrated | Slide 8 of 45 April 2007 Pharmaceutical development Qualification Stage Key elements Design & C Installation Facilities and Engineering phase Validation Stage Operation Prospective Concurrent Manufacturing Start-Up Equipment (Validation Protocols) (Batch Records and Validation documentation) Preparatory phase Design (laboratory) Scale-Up (pilot plant) Production (Validation of (Critical attributes (process optimization (final batch size, analytical and formula screening) and stability batch reproducible biobatch) quality) methods) Product and process development | Slide 9 of 45 April 2007 C O N T I N U O U S I M P R O V E M E N T Guidelines used in PQP Annex 6. Validation of manufacturing processes, in WHO TRS No. 863 (1996). WHO „Guideline on Submission of Documentation for Prequalification of Multi-source (Generic) Finished Pharmaceutical Products (FPPs) Used in the Treatment of HIV/AIDS, Malaria and Tuberculosis. 3.2 Pharmaceutical Development ICH Q8 Pharmaceutical Development (Nov. 2005) ICH Q9 Quality risk management (E.g., FMEA … might be used to analyze a manufacturing operation and its effect on product or process. It identifies elements/operations within the system that render it vulnerable.) | Slide 10 of 45 April 2007 Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development with focus on Paediatric Formulations Desk research Nevirapine 50mg/5 ml oral suspension Information on Nevirapine The synthesis of the two crystal forms is similar until the final drying step Impurity profile is well characterised. Impurities arising from synthesis have been toxicologically qualified The API is milled in order to obtain an acceptable particle size distribution The API is non-hygroscopic No polymorphic changes were observed under stressed conditions No degradation products have been detected during stability testing Batch analysis data confirm that nevirapine hemihydrate complies with the specifications http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/PDFs/EPAR/Viramune/109697en6.pdf http://www.fda.gov/cder/ogd/rld/20933s3.PDF Nevirapine is official in the PhInt | Slide 12 of 45 April 2007 Information on Nevirapine Nevirapine is lipophilic (partition coefficient 83) and is essentially nonionized at physiologic pH. As a weak base (pKa 2.8), Nevirapine is showing increased solubility at acidic pH values. Source: Meck Index Aqueous solubility (anhydrate) (90μg/ml at 25°C). | Slide 13 of 45 April 2007 Nevirapine is highly stable Viramune 50 mg/5 ml oral suspension Oral suspension containing 10 mg/ml of nevirapine as 10.35 mg/ml Nevirapine Hemihydrate as the API. Excipients: Carbomer, methyl parahydroxybenzoate, propyl parahydroxybenzoate, sorbitol, sucrose, polysorbate 80, sodium hydroxide and purified water. (FDA excipient list: Carbomer 934P). Shelf life: 3 years The product should be used within 2 months of opening. No special precautions for storage Nature and contents of container White HDPE bottle with two piece childresistant closure (outer shell white HDPE, inner shell natural polypropylene) with LDPE foam liner. Each bottle contains 240 ml of oral suspension. Clear polypropylene 5-ml dispensing syringe (0.2 ml graduations) with silicone rubber piston seal. Clear low density polyethylene bottle-syringe adapter. http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/PDFs/EPAR/Viramune/109697en6.pdf http://www.fda.gov/cder/ogd/rld/20933s3.PDF Nevirapine oral suspension monograph (PhInt) is being developed | Slide 14 of 45 April 2007 Viramune 50 mg/5 ml oral suspension The HDPE bottle material is inert and was shown to be compatible with the active substance and other ingredients of the formulation. The levels of preservatives have been correlated with antimicrobial effectiveness tested according to PhEur Acceptable data demonstrating the precision and accuracy of the dosing syringe were provided. Synthesis impurities are not degradants and not part of FPP specifications The method of preparation of the oral suspension is standard for this form and has been adequately described. Validation data presented on three production batches manufactured using three different lots of nevirapine anhydrous (?) were adequate to demonstrate that the process is under control and ensures both batch-to-batch reproducibility and compliance with standard specifications. Tests at release are standard and ensure reproducible clinical performance of the product. | Slide 15 of 45 April 2007 Viramune 50 mg/5 ml oral suspension Stability data up to 18 months for the newly recapped oral suspension and 24 months with the old pulpboard liner confirmed the physical and chemical stability of the oral suspension and the antimicrobial efficacy of the preservative. These results support a shelf life of 24 months. Long-term stability data will be submitted on ongoing basis. An in-use stability study designed to mimic the delivery of 2 ml dose, which represents one of the lowest projected doses, twice a day, using the delivery device intended for marketing has been performed. An additional study is presented on the stability of the product exposed to freeze-thaw conditions. On the basis of results from both studies, the claimed in-use shelf life of 60 days with no special storage precautions is supported. | Slide 16 of 45 April 2007 Clinical information Nevirapine was readily absorbed (> 90 %) after oral administration in healthy volunteers and in adults with HIV-1 infection. A 3-way crossover study compared the bioavailability from three production/commercial scale batches with varying dissolution profiles. All three batches were bioequivalent with respect to systemic exposure (AUC). The significantly different values for Cmax and tmax were considered not to be clinically relevant. In studies 1100.1231 and 1100.896 in which the suspension was administered directly using a syringe, it was demonstrated that the suspension and tablet formulations were comparably bioavailable with respect to extent of absorption. In study 1100.1213 the suspension was administered in a dosing cup without rinsing. The suspension intended for marketing was bioequivalent to the suspension used during clinical trials but was not bioequivalent to the marketed tablets. This could be attributed to incomplete dosing of the two suspensions since there was about 13 % of the dose remaining in the cup. | Slide 17 of 45 April 2007 Clinical information It has been later determined in a single dose study in 9 patients aged between 9 months and 14 years administered after an overnight fast (3 patients per dose level equivalent to 7.5 mg/m², 30.0 mg/m² and 120.0 mg/m²). Based on adult experience, a comparable lead-in period of two weeks was suggested for paediatric population. A 4 mg/kg dose is proposed for all children regardless the age. Although no particular study has been performed to find the optimal lead-in dose, this dose was considered acceptable considering the enzyme induction to achieve initial antiretroviral activity. The final recommended doses for the different ages are therefore the following: Patients from 2 months to 8 years, 4 mg/kg once daily for 2 weeks followed by 7 mg/kg bid Patients from 8 years to 16 years are 4 mg/kg once daily followed by 4-mg/kg bids. | Slide 18 of 45 April 2007 Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development with focus on Paediatric Formulations Generic pharmaceutical product and process development Pharmaceutical development for generics Product target profile (PTF) is different: – Innovator PTP is based on clinical studies – Generic FPP targets the innovator FPP Multisource FPP manufacturers must be highly skilled in product development The chances of developing a bioequivalent generic product can be significantly increased by using the formulation of the innovator. The lowest risk strategy for the development of an interchangeable multisource FPP is to copy the innovator FPP. Manufacturing processes are the same for innovators and generic manufacturers. | Slide 20 of 45 April 2007 Innovator suspension – bench marking (1) Sample confirmation – – – – Batch numbers Shelf life: 3 years and within 2 months of opening. Storage instructions: No special precautions for storage Container and closure system: as per EPAR QC analysis (hypothetical figures) – – – – – – – | Assay: 99.9% of labelled amount (LA) Methylparaben (HPLC): 0.18% w/v Propylparaben (HPLC): 0.02% w/v Total related substances: 0.03% Specific gravity (at 25oC): 1.150 Viscosity (at 25oC): 1,150 cPs pH: 5.80 Slide 21 of 45 April 2007 Innovator suspension – bench marking (2) The composition suggests that: Sucrose and sorbitol are used to adjust the density of the medium Carbomer 934P is used to adjust viscosity Polysorbate is a wetting agent Sodium hydroxide is used to adjust the pH to 5.8 | Slide 22 of 45 April 2007 Innovator product – bench marking (3) Time (minutes) % API dissolved Dissolution profile (% LA) (hypothetical figures) 5 27 10 42 15 55 20 65 Apparatus: USP II (paddle, 25rpm) Medium: 0.1N HCl Volume: 900ml | 30 76 45 88 60 92 Slide 23 of 45 April 2007 http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/diss olution/dsp_SearchResults_Dissolutions.cfm downloaded on 13 March 2007 Innovator product – bench marking (4) Time (minutes) 5 10 15 20 30 45 60 90 % API dissolved % API dissolved % API dissolved (hypothetical figures) (hypothetical figures) (hypothetical figures) pH 1.2 buffer 27 pH 4.5 buffer 15 pH 6.8 buffer 22 42 55 65 25 36 42 27 35 42 76 88 92 48 49 49 49 57 65 100 50 76 Dissolution profile (% LA), Apparatus: USP II (paddle, 25rpm), Volume: 900ml – Different speeds to be investigated | Slide 24 of 45 April 2007 Pharmaceutical development protocol API experiments – Solubility at 37 oC – Particle size distribution – Density Formulation experiments – Screening laboratory batches with different proportions of excipients to match innovator dissolution – Stress testing of the selected composition – Compatibility with excipients – Antimicrobial effectiveness test according to PhEur Packing materials – Dimensions and tolerances of packing components – Precision and accuracy of the dosing syringe | Slide 25 of 45 April 2007 Product-specific physical API properties Introduction of the API starting material(s) into process Production of intermediate(s) Isolation and purification Physical processing and packaging PhInt specifications + residual solvents from APIMF. Product-specific physical properties depend on crystallization and subsequent physical processing. Density and particle size distribution of Nevirapine Hemihydrate are critical quality attributes of the API. Acceptance criteria are established by measurement of particle size of innovator’s API in suspension and through the similarity of dissolution profiles of innovator and generic products. | Slide 26 of 45 April 2007 Stress stability testing - Nevirapine Stress type | Conditions Assay (%) Control 25o C 99.8 36% HCl 80o C, 40 min. 72.0 5N NaOH 80o C, 2h 20’ 98.6 30% w/w H2O2 80o C, 2h 20’ 98.6 Heat 130o C, 49h 101.5 Light 500W/m2, 68h 101.7 Water 25o C, 92% RH, 91h 101.2 Slide 27 of 45 April 2007 Solubility of nevirapine hemihydrate at 37oC pH Dissolved material (mg/ml) (hypothetical figures) 1.2 2.75 2.1 0.28 3.0 0.08 4.5 0.06 6.8 0.06 7.2 0.06 8.0 0.06 Nevirapine Hemihydrate belongs to BCS Class 2 (low solubility, high permeability). Solubility data are also important for cleaning validation | Slide 28 of 45 April 2007 Dissolution profiles of innovator and generic FPPs M e a n % A P I d i s s o l v e d 120 100 ▀ innovator 80 ▀ generic 60 Similarity factor, f2=73 40 20 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (minutes) | Slide 29 of 45 April 2007 60 70 80 90 Selected generic composition (hypothetical figures) Ingredients Nevirapine hemihydrate mg/5ml 51.7 Excipients – – – – – – – – | Carbomer 934P Methyl parahydroxybenzoate Propyl parahydroxybenzoate Sorbitol Sucrose Polysorbate 80 Sodium hydroxide Purified water to make Slide 30 of 45 April 2007 8.0 10.0 1.0 800.0 700.0 3.0 q.s. 5.0 ml Compatibility with excipients Nevirapine Hemihydrate in solid state – illustrative example: heat Stress Condition Treatment None Initial values API Heat API is mixed with excipient, the mixture is wetted and a thin layer of the powder blend is kept at 60°C for 4 weeks in a Petri dish (open system) Observations Assay: SI1: D1: Total unspecified: Total impurities: Assay: SI1: D2: Total unspecified: Total impurities: To do: stress testing the dose-proportional mixture of the APIs in aqueous medium. | Slide 31 of 45 April 2007 Risk assessment matrix – illustrative Milling Wetting Weighing API API Vehicle Wet milling Filling Packing Dissolution Assay Degradation Content uniformity Stability physical microbial pH Not critical to Q | Slide 32 of 45 April 2007 Potentially critical to Q Monitoring strategy Critical to Q Control strategy Process development Selection of process: standard for oral aqueous suspensions The progress from pre-formulation → formulation → pilot manufacture (not less than 1/10th of production batch) → production scale (approved batch size) manufacture should be shown in the dossier submitted for prequalification to be logical, reasoned and continuous. A pilot batch is manufactured by a procedure fully representative of and simulating that to be applied to a full production scale batch. Manufacture of primary batches in the proposed container and closure systems for: – Bioequivalence and dissolution studies – Regulatory stability studies ( including in-use stability study and an additional study under freeze-thaw conditions.) – Prospective validation of bioequivalence, dissolution and stability batches | Slide 33 of 45 April 2007 Proposed FPP specifications Description Identification (HPLC) Dissolution (UV): Q = 70% in 45 minutes pH = 4.8 – 6.2 Deliverable volume – Average fill volume: NLT 240 ml – Fill volume variation: should meet PhInt requirements Related substances: not tested Preservative content (HPLC) – Methylparaben: 98 to 102% of LA – Propylparaben: 98 to 102% of LA [End of shelf life: 80 to 102% of LA] [End of shelf life: 80 to 102% of LA] Assay: 95.0 to 105.0% of LA End-of shelf-life acceptance limits for assay should not be proposed at this stage. | Slide 34 of 45 April 2007 Scale up activities Stability protocol is prepared A large number of samples is tested from pilot scale batches to establish provisional acceptance limits for the control of critical process parameters (prospective validation, IPC limits) in order to define design space (process knowledge) and control strategy (risk mitigation) that encompasses aspects of scale, environmental aspects of site, packaging, as well as final product stability. The process will be well understood when: – all critical sources of variability have been identified and explained – variability is managed by the process – product quality attributes can be accurately and reliably predicted Validation protocol is written Dossier is submitted for prequalification | Slide 35 of 45 April 2007 High-shear batch mixer and in-line mixer | Slide 36 of 45 April 2007 Dissolution (and bioequivalence) batch Innovator FPP Generic FPP Dissolution test 3 batches Production batch, or NLT 1/10 of final size Select a batch showing intermediate dissolution Reference product Test product Dissolution profile | Slide 37 of 45 April 2007 Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development with focus on Paediatric Formulations Special features of FDCs 4-FDC antituberculosis FPP Originator FPP in ICH region None FPP in current (14th) List Essential Medicines Rifampicin Isoniazid Pyrazinamide Ethambutol | Slide 39 of 45 April 2007 150 mg 75 mg 400 mg 275 mg 4FDC-TB tablets exposed to 40°C/75%RH for one week Two different products. “Bleeding” may start after more exposure to stress testing without packing material. (Source: North-West University, South Africa) Control on left Control on left | Slide 40 of 45 April 2007 A typical incompatibility Magnesium stearate is incompatible with salts of weak bases and strong acids, such as: – Amodiaquine hydrochloride – Ethambutol hydrochloride – Mefloquine hydrochloride because the formed MgCl2 is highly hygroscopic (the hexahydrate is also deliquescent) and, as a result, the lubricant properties of magnesium stearate also change. | Slide 41 of 45 April 2007 Critical quality variables 1. The formulation is hygroscopic, sensitive to light and unstable (reaction between rifampicin and isoniazid). 2. Moisture content of FPP and intermediates (granules and uncoated tablets). 3. Ethambutol.2HCl provides acidic conditions to accelerate reaction between rifampicin and isoniazid. 4. Packing materials are critical for stability. 5. Compatibility of APIs with each other and with excipients 6. Stress stability testing of the final formulation 7. Control of temperature and RH during the manufacturing process 8. Heavy-duty compression machine. 9. Validation batches and annual product review reports. 10. Stability testing of the FPP to include visual inspection, assay, impurities and degradants (in particular isonicotinyl hydrazone), LOD, hardness, and other attributes. | Slide 42 of 45 April 2007 Main points again Pharmaceutical development is an essential part of applications for prequalification. Desk research gives valuable information for generic pharmaceutical product and process development for paediatric formulations. FPP-specific quality and processability requirements are integrated into the API specifications during pharmaceutical development studies. A science- and risk-based pharmaceutical development of generic FPPs provides a high level of assurance for interchangeability with the innovator product. Manufacturing process design and optimization identifies the critical attributes whose control leads to the batch-to-batch consistency of quality. | Slide 43 of 45 April 2007 Science- and risk-based approach means: There will be no weak eye in the pharmaceutical development chain | Slide 44 of 45 April 2007 THANK YOU | Slide 45 of 45 April 2007