Rapid, Predictive Modeling for High Frequency Interconnect on Low Cost Substrates Dissertation Defense Presentation Spring, 2005 Jaemin Shin Advisor: Dr. Martin A. Brooke School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332 April 2005 Outline Objective Limitations of Electrical Board-level Interconnects Background Motivation Proposed Modeling Procedure Modeling of Straight Microstrip Lines Modeling of Serpentine Interconnects Conclusions 2 Objective Our goal is to develop a rapid, predictive (scalable) measurement-based modeling method for high frequency interconnects on low cost substrates: Modeling of interconnect structures Prediction by scalability and interpolation Evaluation of modeling performance with measured behaviors and a simulation tool. 3 Outline Objective Limitations of Electrical Board-level Interconnects Board-level Interconnect Geometrical limitations at high frequency Background Motivation Proposed Modeling Procedure Modeling of Straight Microstrip Lines Modeling of Serpentine Interconnects Conclusions 4 Board-level Interconnect in Telecommunication Backplane Interconnect Chip-to-chip Interconnect [1] http://www.ece.gatech.edu/research/labs/mag/mixed_signal/mixedsig3.htm 5 Limitations of Electrical Board-level Interconnects 1 Signal integrity problems Transmission-line effects High rising and falling time and delay time High channel loss of long channels Non-ideal effects at high frequency Skin effect Frequency-dependent dielectric loss Manufacturing variations Geometrical issues Geometrical discontinuity Dense connections Reflection loss (Echo effect) Self-coupling Crosstalk Electromagnetic interference (EMI) 6 Limitations of Electrical Board-level Interconnects 2 Switching noise High power consumption Thermal problem Approaches to addressing the limitations Advanced electrical technology High speed interconnect driver : LVDS, CML, and PECL Clock & data recovering circuit (CDR) Contribution of this thesis work High performance board material Co-design with accurate channel model Optical interconnect technology Optical technology VSCEL (Vertical Surface Cavity Emitting Laser), micro-mirror, and optical waveguide embedding techniques 7 Trend of Board-level Interconnect 60 According to 2003 ITRS (International Technology Roadmap of Semiconductor) In near-term years, off-chip frequency will be to keep its speed lower than 10 GHz. Most telecommunication companies have preferred the use of low cost FR4 materials. Moreover, cost-performance and low-cost products occupy a considerable area of the market Thus, interconnects on FR4 are still attractive. However, at high frequency, FR4 material needs more design work with an efficient, accurate model to achieve acceptable electrical performance. Frequency (GHz) 50 40 30 20 10 0 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 Year On-chip frequency Off-chip frequency [2] http://public.itrs.net/Files/2003ITRS/Home2003.htm 8 Example 1: Long Straight Lines of Different Dielectric Materials 1 Four different board materials Configuration of striplines with 50-Ω characteristic impedance 12-mil wide, 18-inch long channel line εr εr tanδ @1 MHz @1 GHz @1GHz Relative Cost FR4 4.30 4.05 0.020 1 GETEK 4.15 4.00 0.015 1.1 ROGERS 4350/4320 3.75 3.60 0.009 2.1 ARLON CLTE 3.15 3.05 0.004 6.8 Material [3] http://www.tycoelectronics.com/products/simulation/files/papers/dc00brdh.pdf 9 Example 1: Long Straight Lines of Different Dielectric Materials 2 Eye diagrams at 5 Gbps and 10 Gbps a) 5 Gbps b) 10 Gbps [3] http://www.tycoelectronics.com/products/simulation/files/papers/dc00brdh.pdf 10 Example 2: Long Straight Lines with a Via Low-cost FR4 material Microstrip with 50-Ω characteristic impedance Via connection Three different line lengths (1, 10 and 20cm) and three different speeds (1 G, 2.5 G and10 Gbps) Straight transmission line without via 130 mil 1.7 mil 20 mil FR4 εr=4.3 Straight transmission line with via 11 Example 3: Interconnect Structures with Couplings and Bends 130-mil wide serpentine structures on FR4 board Coupling effects and bending effects 130-mil wide M-shaped serpentine structure with 65-mil spacing 130-mil wide M-shaped serpentine structure with 130-mil spacing Bending effect & Line length Coupling effect 10Gbps 12 130-mil wide 7-turn serpentine structure with 130-mil spacing Outline Objective Limitations of Electrical Board-level Interconnects Background Non-ideal Effects Previous Modeling Methods Motivation Proposed Modeling Procedure Modeling of Straight Microstrip Lines Modeling of Serpentine Interconnects Conclusions 13 Non-ideal Effects on Transmission Line 1 Skin effect Skin depth 2 0 F0 =130mil 14 m Non-ideal Effects on Transmission Line 2 Frequency-dependent dielectric loss FR4 Complex dielectric constant due to the electric polarization BT/Epoxy '-j " Polymide Loss tangent tan 951 Green TapeTM " ' ' [4] D. I. Amey and S. J. Horowitz, "Materials performance at frequencies up to 20 GHz," presented at IEMT/IMC Symposium, 1997., 1st [Joint International Electronic Manufacturing Symposium and the International Microelectronics Conference], 1997. 15 Non-ideal Effects on Transmission Line 3 Manufacturing variations Composite ratio (glass- to- resin ratio) r rsnVrsn glsVgls Metal Conductor surface roughness Too rough and random FR4 Fabrication tolerance The need for statistical approaches 16 SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope) picture Previous Modeling Methods Earlier interconnect research: microwave and digital engineering Microwave engineering: transmission lines in narrow bandwidths Digital engineering: timing analysis at low frequency High-frequency digital interconnect: frequency analysis based on the electromagnetic equations, numerical methods, and measurement techniques Three classical methods Analytical equation-based method Numerical full-wave-based method Measurement-based method 17 Analytical Equation-based Method Direct derivation of a model from the fundamental electromagnetic equations Neither accurate nor practical unless the structures of interest are simple Not flexible Difficult to develop, in general Basic insight and background for the two following methods 18 Numerical Full-wave-based Method Maxwell equation-based method Discretization of a structure into small segments to obtain accurate responses of the entire system (tradeoff between accuracy and computational efficiency) Accurate and highly flexible Slow speed and extensive memory requirements for complex geometrical systems Difficult to incorporate the non-ideal effects such as frequency-dependent variables and manufacturing variations 19 Measurement-based Method Measured data in the frequency domain can be used to find circuit model parameters. Optimization techniques are used for the equivalent-circuit parameters Statistical modeling approaches can be applied to overcome the manufacturing variations The non-ideal effects are naturally incorporated Compatible with the existing circuit simulators Very accurate and fast Needs to be more flexible 20 Motivation The need for an accurate, rapid model for interconnects on FR4 to address electrical board-level interconnect limitations at high frequency Advantages of the measurement-based method compared with others FR4 material limitations Non-ideal effects Geometrical limitations Inefficiency of numerical methods for complex structures Easy: Compatibility with the circuit simulators Efficient - Very fast simulation speed - No need for heavy computation resources Accurate: Incorporation of the non-ideal effects Statistical: Incorporation of the fabrication tolerance Co-simulation and Co-design with circuits The need for improved flexibility: the use of scalability and interpolation can achieve this goal. 21 Proposed Modeling Procedure Determining the interconnect structures to be considered Co-simulation and co-design with circuitry Defining building blocks Generating model library Design and fabrication Statistical approaches Calibration and measurement Verification with measured data Extraction of EC-parameters using optimization Initial modeling Predicting other structures by using the scalable model and interpolation Extension 22 Generalization Performance Evaluation Modeling performance attributes Accuracy Frequency domain: Impedance parameters Time domain: Eye diagrams Efficiency Computation resources Simulation times Utility Limited to accessibility 23 Measurement Setup Frequency response Channel characterization Z-parameters converted from measured S-parameters SOLT (Short-open-load-thru) calibration using 3.5 mm calibration kit Vector network analyzer (VNA) Time response Interconnect verification Eye diagrams Pattern generator and digital oscilloscope VNA Port 1 Port 2 Digital Oscilloscope Pattern generator Device Under Test (DUT) DUT 24 Momentum Simulation 2400 mils Z11 Phase (degree) Z21 Phase (degree) Z21 Magnitude (dB) Z11 Magnitude (dB) Momentum simulation Layout Measured Momentum Momentum simulation results of the 2400 mil microstrip with SMA connector 25 Outline Objective Limitations of Electrical Board-level Interconnects Background Motivation Modeling Procedure Modeling of Straight Microstrip Lines Modeling Description Results and Performance Comparison Modeling of Serpentine Interconnects Conclusions 26 Building Block Diagrams and Equivalent Circuits 400-mil long line 800-mil long line 50 mil SMA Building Block SMA Building Block Rectangular Building Block Rectangular Building Block SMA Connector Building Block 27 Test Structures of the Straight Microstrip Lines 1600 mil long line 2400 mil long line 1200 mil long line 800 mil long line 28 400 mil long line (Predictive model) Optimization of Equivalent-circuit Parameters Equivalent-circuit block SMA connector building block S-parameter simulation setup 50 mil long microstrip building block Measured s-parameter data block Optimization setup Initial values 29 Z11 Phase (degree) Z21 Phase (degree) Z11 Magnitude (dB) Z21 Magnitude (dB) Optimized Z-parameter Data of the 400-mil Long Line Measured 30 Modeled Z11 Phase (degree) Z21 Phase (degree) Z21 Magnitude (dB) Z11 Magnitude (dB) Predicted Z-parameter Data of the 800-mil Long Line Measured Modeled 31 Momentum Z11 Phase (degree) Z21 Phase (degree) Z21 Magnitude (dB) Z11 Magnitude (dB) Predicted Z-parameter Data of the 2400-mil Long Line Measured Modeled 32 Momentum Comparison of Eye Diagrams of the 2400-mil Long Line Measured eye diagrams 1 Gbps 2.5 Gbps 5 Gbps 7.5 Gbps 500 mV 0V Simulated eye diagrams using the predicted structure 500 mV 0V 33 10 Gbps Simulation Time vs. Line Length Simulation Resources a UNIX computer 500 MHz Ultra SPARC IIi CPU 2 G-byte memory 34 Outline Objective Limitations of Electrical board-level Interconnects Background Motivation Modeling Procedure Modeling of Straight Microstrip Lines Modeling of Serpentine Interconnects Modeling Description Results and Performance Comparison Interpolation Conclusions 35 Building-block Diagrams and Equivalent Circuits N-shaped structure M-shaped structure SMA Connector Building Block Coupled Rectangular Building Block Uncoupled Rectangular Building Block 36 U-shaped Building Block Combination of Equivalent Circuits Equivalent circuits of the N-shaped structure 37 Test Structures 1 3 different widths and 3 different spacings Predicting 38 Test Structures 2 Four additional extended structures 130-mil width and 130-mil spacing (1S) 4-, 5-, 6- and 7- turn serpentine interconnect structures 4 turns 6 turns 5 turns 39 7 turns Optimization of Equivalent-circuit Parameters Predictive equivalent circuit block Measured s-parameter data block S-parameter simulation setup Initial values SMA connector U-shape Uncoupled Rectangle Optimization setup Uncoupled Rectangle Coupled Rectangle Mutual Coupling Element 40 Z11 Phase (degree) Z21 Phase (degree) Z21 Magnitude (dB) Z11 Magnitude (dB) Optimized Z-parameter Data of the N-shaped Serpentine Structure Measured 41 Modeled Z11 Phase (degree) Z21 Phase (degree) Z21 Magnitude (dB) Z11 Magnitude (dB) Predicted Z-parameter Data of the M-shaped Serpentine Structure Measured Modeled 42 Momentum Comparison of Eye Diagrams of the M-shaped Serpentine Structure Measured eye diagrams 1 Gbps 2.5 Gbps 5 Gbps 7.5 Gbps 500 mV 0V Simulated eye diagrams using the predicted structure 500 mV 0V 43 10 Gbps Z11 Phase (degree) Z21 Phase (degree) Z21 Magnitude (dB) Z11 Magnitude (dB) Predicted Z-parameter Data of the 7-turn Serpentine Structure Measured Modeled 44 Momentum Comparison of Eye Diagrams of the 7-turn Serpentine Structure Measured eye diagrams 1 Gbps 2.5 Gbps 5 Gbps 7.5 Gbps 500 mV 0V Simulated eye diagrams using the predicted structure 500 mV 0V 45 10 Gbps Simulation Time vs. Number of Turns Simulation Resources a UNIX computer 500 MHz Ultra SPARC IIi CPU 2 G-byte memory N-shaped M-shaped 46 Interpolation N-shaped Structure Interpolation 65-mil spacing (0.5 S) Spacing-interpolation 130-mil width and 130-mil spacing (1S) 104-mil width (-20%) 156-mil width (+20%) Width-interpolation 260-mil spacing (2 S) 47 Z-parameter Data of N-shaped Structure Predicted by Width-interpolation Z11 Phase (degree) Z21 Phase (degree) Z21 Magnitude (dB) Z11 Magnitude (dB) Predicted Z-parameter data of the 130-mil wide N-shaped serpentine structure Measured 48 Modeled Comparison of Eye Diagrams of the Predicted N-shaped Structure by Width-interpolation Measured eye diagrams 1 Gbps 2.5 Gbps 5 Gbps 7.5 Gbps 10 Gbps 500 mV 0V Simulated eye diagrams using the predicted structure obtained by widthinterpolation 500 mV 0V 49 Z-parameter Data of M-shaped Structure Predicted by Width-interpolation Z11 Phase (degree) Z21 Phase (degree) Z21 Magnitude (dB) Z11 Magnitude (dB) Z-parameter data of the 130-mil wide M-shaped serpentine structure predicted using EC-parameters of the width-interpolated N-shaped structure Measured 50 Modeled Comparison of Eye Diagrams of the Predicted M-shaped Structure using the EC-parameters of the Width-interpolated N-shaped Structure Measured eye diagrams 1 Gbps 2.5 Gbps 5 Gbps 7.5 Gbps 10 Gbps 500 mV 0V Simulated eye diagrams using the width-interpolated predicted structure 500 mV 0V 51 Z-parameter Data of N-shaped Structure Predicted by Spacing-interpolation Predicted Z-parameter data of the N-shaped serpentine structure with 130-mil spacing (1S) Z11 Phase (degree) Z21 Phase (degree) Z11 Magnitude (dB) Z21 Magnitude (dB) Measured 52 Modeled Comparison of Eye Diagrams of the Predicted N-shaped Structure Obtained by Spacing-interpolation Measured eye diagrams 1 Gbps 2.5 Gbps 5 Gbps 7.5 Gbps 10 Gbps 500 mV 0V Simulated eye diagrams using the spacing-interpolated predictive model 500 mV 0V 53 Predicted Z-parameter Data of M-shaped Structure by Spacing-interpolation Z11 Phase (degree) Z21 Phase (degree) Z21 Magnitude (dB) Z11 Magnitude (dB) Z-parameter data of the M-shaped serpentine structure with 130-mil spacing (1S) predicted using EC-parameters of the spacing-interpolated N-shaped structure Measured 54 Modeled Comparison of Eye Diagrams of the Predicted M-shaped Structure using EC-parameters of the Spacing-interpolated N-shaped Structure Measured eye diagrams 1 Gbps 2.5 Gbps 5 Gbps 7.5 Gbps 10 Gbps 500 mV 0V Simulated eye diagrams from the predictive model by spacing-interpolation 500 mV 0V 55 Conclusions A rapid, predictive measurement-based modeling method was developed for high-frequency interconnects on FR4. Our method was applied to the modeling of straight microstrip lines and serpentine interconnect structures. The predictive power of the developed scalable models was demonstrated in several extended interconnect structures, and the ability to use interpolation to predict the high frequency performance of structures with differently sized building blocks was demonstrated. The usefulness of this predictive method was validated by comparing our predictions with measurements both in the frequency and time domains and by comparing our predictions with the ADS momentum simulations in terms of efficiency and accuracy. Therefore, this proposed high-frequency interconnect modeling method is not only efficient but accurate as well, compared with the measured behaviors and the momentum simulation. Furthermore, the interpolation enable fast accurate predictions for variations of interconnects in width and spacing. 56 Publications Generated 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) J. Shin, C.-S. Seo, A. Chellappa, M. Brooke, A. Chattejce and N. M. Jokerst, "Comparison of electrical and optical interconnect," Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2003. O. Bourdreaux, S.-Y. Cho, J. Shin, A. Chellappa, D. Schimmel, M. Brooke and N. M. Jokerst, "Optical chip-to-chip interconnects for memory systems," presented at Lasers and Electro-Optics Society, LEOS, the 16th Annual Meeting of the IEEE, 2003. C. Cha, J. Shin, Z. huang, N. M. Jokerst and M. Brooke, “High-Frequency Equivalent Circuit-Level Model of MSM PD for Optical Front-end Receiver Applications,” presented at Asia Pacific Microwave conference, APMC 2003. N. M. Jokerst, T. K. Gaylord, E. Glytsis, M. A. Brooke, S. Cho, T. Nonaka, T. Suzuki, D. L. Geddis, J. Shin, R. Villalaz, J. Hall, A. Chellapa and M. Vrazel,"Planar lightwave integrated circuits with embedded actives for board and substrate level optical signal distribution," Advanced Packaging, IEEE Transactions on [see also Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology, Part B: Advanced Packaging, IEEE Transactions on], vol. 27, pp. 376-385, 2004. J. Shin, C. Cha, S. Cho, J. Kim, N. M. Jokerst and M. Brooke,"FR4 printed circuit board design for Giga-bits embedded optical interconnect applications," presented at Electronic Components and Technology, ECTC '04. Proceedings, 2004. J. Shin, S.-W. Seo, S.-Y. Cho, J. H. Kim, M. Brook and N. M. Jokerst,"Embedded photodetectors in polymer waveguides for optical interconnect integrated with a Si-Ge transimpedance amplifier circuit operating at 2.5 Gbit/s,"presented at Biophotonics/Optical Interconnects and VLSI Photonics/WBM Microcavities, Digest of the LEOS Summer Topical Meetings, 2004. J. H. Kim, J. Shin, C. Cha, N. Jokerst and M. Brooke, “Wideband multiple resonance small-signal laser diode model for the co-design of laser drive circuits,” presented at the 47th Midwest Symposium, 2004. J. Shin, J. H. Kim, C. Cha, N. M. Jokerst and M. Brooke,”Rapid, Predictive Measurement-based Modeling for High Frequency Interconnect on FR4 Substrate,” accepted at Electronic Components and Technology, 2005. J. H. Kim, J. Shin, C. Cha, N. M. Jokerst, and M. A. Brooke, “An Improved Wideband Laser Diode Lumped Element Equivalent Circuit Model for the Optoelectronic Circuit Design,” submitted at Information and Communication Engineers (IEICE) Transactions on Information and Systems, 2005 57 Question Thank You 58