APPENDIX PV18d SCHOOL AUDIT REPORT School of X Faculty of X Date of Audit: Month Year CONTENTS AUDIT TEAM MEMBERSHIP ............................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 3 SCHOOL AUDIT REPORT ................................................................................................... 4 1. Characteristics of the School ...................................................................................... 4 2. Previous audits ........................................................................................................... 4 3. Organisation and management ................................................................................... 4 4. Contribution to the Faculty Plan .................................................................................. 5 5. Quality assurance ....................................................................................................... 6 6. Conclusions ................................................................................................................ 7 1 AUDIT TEAM MEMBERSHIP Chair: External Advisers: Head of School: Member of academic staff from the Faculty in which the School is based: Students’ Union representative: Dean of Quality and Standards or other senior University officer: Secretary (Academic Office): 2 INTRODUCTION Introductory statement to be agreed 3 SCHOOL AUDIT REPORT 1. Characteristics of the School 1.1 Statement on the School’s historical development and any specific areas explored. 1.2 Statement on the description of the School as it stands today and any specific areas explored. 1.3 Statement on whether the school’s academic portfolio is balanced and appropriate. Does it have any unusual or distinctive features? 1.4 Statement on any programmes or modules with very few students enrolled. What impact does this have on timetable issues for the School and staff? 1.5 Statement regarding whether the School regularly reviews the number of programmes and modules available and the number of students enrolling on these programmes. 2. Previous audits 2.1 If there has been a previous audit of the School, is there evidence that the School has responded appropriately to any recommendations? 2.2 Statement on any issues from previous audits that appear to be outstanding or ongoing. 3. Organisation and management 3.1 Statement on whether the School is organised effectively. 3.2 Statement on the whether the School is resourced appropriately. Is a strategy in place for allocation of resources? 3.3 Statement on whether the School has managed any restructuring challenges effectively. 3.4 Statement on whether the School offers an appropriate number of degree programmes in proportion to the staff resources available. 3.5 Statement regarding the clarity of roles and responsibilities of individuals and committees. 3.6 Statement regarding whether committees meet frequently and adequately discuss the issues raised. 3.7 Statement regarding the clarity of the decision-making process. 3.8 Statement regarding the School’s communication with its staff and students. Are there any weaknesses in its approach? 3.9 Statement regarding whether the School has an effective programme management structure for all its programmes. 4 3.10 Statement regarding the effective management of the delivery of provision across campuses, if relevant. 3.11 Statement regarding the fair distribution of workloads. 3.12 Statement regarding whether the School has a sound management structure that can carry it through future opportunities and/or problems. Strengths: Weaknesses: Examples of good practice: Matters identified for future action by the School: Matters identified for future action by the Faculty: Matters identified for future action by the University: 4. Contribution to the Faculty Plan 4.1 Statement regarding the School’s contribution to the Faculty Plan in relation to recruitment and retention. 4.2 Statement regarding the accuracy and appropriateness of publicity materials produced by the School. Could they be enhanced? 4.3 Statement regarding the accuracy and appropriateness of materials produced for current students. Do they adhere to University templates? Could they be enhanced? 4.4 Statement on whether mechanisms are in place for checking and monitoring the materials provided for prospective and current students. 4.5 Statement regarding the strategy for student support. 4.6 Statement regarding the appropriateness of the School’s contribution to the Faculty Plan in relation to programme development. 4.7 Statement on the appropriateness of the School’s contribution to the Faculty Plan in relation to learning, teaching and quality enhancement. Does this apply at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels? 5 4.8 Statement on whether there is evidence that programme design and delivery is informed by: Recent developments in techniques of teaching, learning and assessment Opportunities for technology enhanced learning Current research and scholarship University priorities such as sustainability and employability 4.9 Statement on the appropriateness of the School’s contribution to the Faculty Plan in relation to staff engagement in scholarly activity. 4.10 Statement on the appropriateness of the School’s contribution to the Faculty Plan in relation to collaborative partnerships (where applicable). 4.11 Statement on whether the School is thinking creatively about future challenges, both within the University and in the external environment. Strengths: Weaknesses: Examples of good practice: Matters identified for future action by the School: Matters identified for future action by the Faculty: Matters identified for future action by the University: 5. Quality assurance 5.1 Statement on the appropriateness of opportunities provided by the School for all students to engage in the quality assurance and enhancement of their educational experience. Could its current arrangements be enhanced? 5.2 Statement on the appropriateness of the School’s response to external examiners’ reports and other forms of external feedback. Could its current arrangements be enhanced? 5.3 Statement on the School’s use of statistical information in evaluating its programmes of study. Could its current arrangements be enhanced? 6 5.4 Where applicable, statement on the appropriateness of the School’s support and monitoring for its flexible and blended learning. Could its current arrangements be enhanced? 5.5 Statement on the School’s support for and monitoring of staff development to ensure teaching quality. Could its current arrangements be enhanced? 5.6 Statement regarding whether the School is implementing the University’s policy on peer observation of teaching. 5.7 Statement regarding the appropriateness of the School’s arrangements for inducting and supporting part-time and visiting staff. 5.8 Statement regarding the appropriateness of the School’s arrangements for ensuring that its research degree provision is of an appropriate quality and standard. Could its current arrangements be enhanced? 5.9 Statement regarding the appropriateness of the School’s arrangements for working with other Schools both within the Faculty and in other Faculties. Could its current arrangements be enhanced? 5.10 Where applicable, statement regarding the appropriateness of the School’s arrangements for supporting its collaborative partnerships. Could its current arrangements be enhanced? Strengths: Weaknesses: Examples of good practice: Matters identified for future action by the School: Matters identified for future action by the Faculty: Matters identified for future action by the University: 6. 6.1 Conclusions Statement regarding the appropriateness of the School’s analysis of its strengths and weaknesses (where provided). 7 6.2 Statement regarding whether the School has produced evidence of how it intends to address its weaknesses and threats and turn them into opportunities or strengths. Strengths: Weaknesses: Examples of good practice: Matters identified for future action by the School: Matters identified for future action by the Faculty: Matters identified for future action by the University: 8