Court Cases that Changed America Have your Supreme Court WS on your desk – it will be checked and we are going over it! Marbury v. Madison (1803) Decision: Partly in order to avoid showdown with Jefferson, court rules in favor of Madison, stating that Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional to start with, thus, Marbury took his case to the wrong place. He does not receive his appointment. Marbury v. Madison (1803) So What? Despite backing down to Jefferson, Court gains powerful tool – Judicial Review. Court now has authority to rule whether or not acts of the government are constitutional. Brilliant! Fletcher v. Peck (1810) Decision: Court held that since the estate had been legally "passed into the hands of a purchaser for a valuable consideration," the Georgia legislature could not take away the land or invalidate the contract. The Court held that laws annulling contracts or grants made by previous legislative acts were constitutionally impermissible – regardless of intention when passed. Fletcher v. Peck (1810) So What? 1st: protected contracts from state interference. 2nd: Court could overturn state laws that opposed specific provisions of the Constitution Contract Clause: Art I, sect 10, clause 1. It states: “ No State shall…pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts… Martin v. Hunter's Lessee (1816) Decision: VA Supreme Court upheld the confiscation, not on the grounds that VA law was superior to US treaties, but because it argued that its own interpretation of the treaty revealed that the treaty did not, in fact, cover the dispute. The US Supreme Court disagreed, and remanded the case back to VA S.C.; VA argued that the US S.C. did not have authority over cases originating in state court. The US S.C. reversed VA’s decision on appeal, ruling that questions of federal law were within its jurisdiction, and thereby establishing supremacy in matters of constitutional interpretation. Martin v. Hunter's Lessee (1816) So What? Court could accept appeals from state courts that involve federal laws or treaties. More importantly, it asserted the Supreme Court’s sovereignty over state courts, rejecting VA’s claim that they were equal sovereigns. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) Decision: Court ruled that Congress did have the authority to charter a bank – via their authority to collect taxes, borrow money, regulate commerce & raise army/navy necessary & proper clause Federal Government is supreme and states could not interfere; taxing the bank was interference. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) So What: Established doctrine of implied powers, providing Congress with more flexibility to enact legislation. Reaffirmed supremacy of Federal government. Cohens v. Virginia (1821) Decision: Court upheld conviction of Cohen brothers. The larger issue: actually reviewing state court cases. The S.C. claimed full appellate jurisdiction over any case tried before a state court. VA decided that this was unacceptable & declared the decision the S.C. made null & void, even though it had upheld the previous conviction, because VA felt the ruling limited states' rights. Cohens v. Virginia (1821) So What? Reasserted federal judicial authority over state courts. Supreme Court argued that when states ratified the Constitution, they gave up some sovereignty to federal courts. Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) Decision: The Court ruled the monopoly unconstitutional. Constitution grants Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce – along coast or on waterways between states. States could regulate trade within its own border. Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) So What? Gave Congress the right to regulate interstate commerce. Interstate commerce clause (along with Necessary & Proper Clause) are the major vehicle for expanding federal power. Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) Moral of the Day! The Constitution says…. …what the Supreme Court says it says. (until they change what they say it says)