Economic Growth v. Development Development is defined by a broad collection of indicators – Output per person, education, health, freedom, fertility, quality of life, institutions, etc. Growth is narrowly defined as the percent change in per capita output (measured by per capita GDP or GNP) Economic development (and to lesser extent, growth) affect and are affected by population growth. PRODUCTION makes wealth possible GDP/GNP Year Price of Hot dogs Quantity of Hot dogs Price of Hamburgers Quantity of Hamburgers 2001 $1 100 $2 50 2002 $2 150 $3 100 2003 $3 200 $4 150 Calculating Nominal GDP: 2001 ($1 per hot dog x 100 hot dogs) + ($2 per hamburger x 50 hamburgers) = $200 2002 ($2 per hot dog x 150 hot dogs) + ($3 per hamburger x 100 hamburgers) = $600 2003 ($3 per hot dog x 200 hot dogs) + ($4 per hamburger x 150 hamburgers) = $1200 Growth and GNP or GDP (a) GNP v. (b) GDP – Value of final goods and services produced in a year (a) by citizens of a given country (b) within the political boundaries of a given country Per capita GNP = GNP/Population Per capita GDP = GDP/Population – Growth Rate Approximation % change GNP - % change population Real v. Nominal GDP/GNP Because both prices and output change over time, we apply a correction to the GDP that essentially holds prices constant. This is called REAL GDP (or GNP). Real GDP (or GNP) must be used to compare production levels over time. GNP/GDP Problems Omits non-traded goods – household production – illegal production and other “informal” market production Goes up when bad things happen – war – oil spills – sickness Fails to reflect resource non-renewable resource consumption GNP/GDP Problems, Continued Currency conversion problems Real v. Nominal – Choice of base year emphasizes certain products and de-emphasizes others. Harcourt, Inc. items and derived items copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. The Variety of Growth Experiences Country Period Real GDP per Real GDP per Person at Person at End Beginning of Period of Period Growth Rate (per year) Japan 1890-1997 $1,196 $23,400 2.82% Brazil 1900-1990 619 6,240 2.41 Mexico 1900-1997 922 8,120 2.27 Germany 1870-1997 1,738 21,300 1.99 Canada 1870-1997 1,890 21,860 1,95 China 1900-1997 570 3,570 1.91 Argentina 1900-1997 1,824 9,950 1.76 United States 1870-1997 3,188 28,740 1.75 Indonesia 1900-1997 708 3,450 1.65 United Kingdom 1870-1997 3,826 20,520 1.33 India 1900-1997 537 1,950 1.34 Pakistan 1900-1997 587 1,590 1.03 Bangladesh 1900-1997 495 1,050 0.78 Country.shp -99 - 1310 1310 - 3540 3540 - 7540 7540 - 14520 14520 - 26980 Harcourt, Inc. items and derived items copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. N W E S Percent of Age Group Enrolled in Tertiary Education T ert iary E n ro llm en t 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Low In co m e L o wer M iddle In co m e U p p er M iddle In co m e U p p er In co m e Population Growth Rates Population Growth Rates 3.00 2.50 2.00 ² Low-income economies 1.50 ² Middle-income economies ²High-income economies 1.00 0.50 Ye ar 1994 1992 1990 1988 1986 1984 1982 1980 1978 1976 1974 1972 1970 1968 1966 1964 1962 1960 0.00 Population Composition World Population Distribution 6,000,000,000 5,000,000,000 ²High-income economies 4,000,000,000 ²High-income economies ² Middle-income economies 3,000,000,000 ² Middle-income economies ² Low-income economies 2,000,000,000 ² Low-income economies 1,000,000,000 Ye ar 1994 1992 1990 1988 1986 1984 1982 1980 1978 1976 1974 1972 1970 1968 1966 1964 1962 1960 0 Percent Under Age 14 Age Structure: % Under Age 14 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 PC GNP 25,000 30,000 35,000 Total Fertility Rate Total Fertility Rate 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 PC GNP 20,000 25,000 30,000 Labor Market Structure Formal Sector – most desired place to work – higher wages – unemployment exists Informal Urban Sector – lower paid – absorbs new migrants Rural Market – still the major employer in many countries Labor Force Growth Rates Labor Force Growth Rate 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Low Income Lower Middle Income Upper Middle Income Upper Income Population of Working Age and Labor Force Size 2,000,000,000 1,800,000,000 1,600,000,000 1,400,000,000 1,200,000,000 1,000,000,000 800,000,000 Population 15-64 Labor Force 600,000,000 Upper Income Upper Middle Income Low Income 0 Lower Middle Income 400,000,000 200,000,000 Structural Patterns in Employment As agriculture declines in the course of development, labor migrates to the cities and enters the formal or informal labor market. Urban Population as % of Total 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Low Income Lower Middle Income Upper Middle Income Upper Income Can Industry Absorb a Rapidly Growing Labor Force? Suppose 20% in Urban Sector and 80% in Rural Sector (Initially) Suppose 3% labor force growth rate Question: What percent growth in urban jobs are necessary for complete absorption? See Excel Worksheet Example