Collection Points Needed - Product Stewardship Institute

advertisement
Infrastructure Workgroup
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Heidi Sanborn, R3 Consulting Group – Facilitator
Scott Cassel, PSI
Dave Nightingale, WA Ecology & NW Prod. Stewardship Council – Lead, Infrastructure
Alison Keane, NPCA – Lead, Reuse
Dave Darling, NPCA
Pamela McAuley, Hotz Environmental
Mark Kurschner, Product Care Association
Susan Peterson, ICI Canada
Barry Elman, EPA
Jen Holliday, Chittenden County, VT
Theresa Stiner, IA DNR
Georges Portelance, Eco-Peinture
Glenn Gallagher, CIWMB
Mike O’Donnell, Phillips Services Corporation
Bruce Baggenstos, PDCA, California
Curtis Bailey, CB Consulting
Leslie Kline, Fresno County, CA
Pandora Touart, City of Federal Way, WA
Melanie Wheeler, NH DES
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
1
Infrastructure Workgroup Projects
1. Paint Reuse Guidance (#3)
2. National Infrastructure Model (#4)
3. Infrastructure Cost Analysis (#5)
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
2
Key Infrastructure Components
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Paint Reuse Primer
Leftover Paint Age Profile
Leftover Paint Quantity Study
Percentage of Recyclable Paint
Infrastructure Cost Analysis
Connection to Lifecycle Assessment/Cost Benefit
Analysis
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
3
Project Timeline
1.
2.
3.
4.
SCS Engineers completed first draft - June 2005
4 workgroup calls since July 1, 2005
Gained additional funding after hiatus
First draft report on the “model” edited by the
Workgroup and presented to SCS to finish
5. PSI research on curbside collection of latex paint
forwarded to SCS about programs in Marion OR and
Unincorporated Alameda County CA
6. Final report expected – September 2006
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
4
Key Issues in the Draft Report
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Leftover paint quantities
Collection points needed
Transportation and aggregation
Processing facilities needed
Facility design recommendations
Preliminary cost information
Conclusions and next steps
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
5
National Infrastructure Model (#4)
Goal:
Determine the most efficient leftover paint infrastructure
system.
Method:
Develop a report, which includes a model on how to
establish a national infrastructure for paint management
that will efficiently and effectively collect and manage
leftover paint.
Include results from other projects, such as the Paint
Reuse Manual.
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
6
Leftover Paint Quantities
 Paint collection = paint sales x collection rate
 Paint sales = 2.3 gal/person/yr
 Collection rate (based on 50% collection of leftover
paint)
– Low: 2.5% of paint sales
– Medium: 5.0% of paint sales
– High: 7.5% of paint sales
– Extra High: 10.0% of paint sales
 Plan for an increase in collection – phases
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
7
Leftover Paint Quantities
 EPA Revised Draft Report – end of May 2006??
 Anything further to report?
 This section is on hold until EPA report
completed.
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
8
Collection Points Needed
Type
– Dedicated facilities
– Co-located drop-off points
 Number of collection and aggregation points
 Community type designations
1. Super-urban (very dense cities)
2. Urban/metro areas (most other cities)
3. Isolated cities and towns (10,000-50,000)
4. Very rural (remote, sparsely populated)

May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
9
Approach to Estimate Number of
Collection Points Needed
 Service level approach – based on service at
existing collection programs (people per
collection point)
– Need convenience within geographic area
– Collection sites needed: 2,090
– Equal to 0.06 gallons/person (LOW)
– Most popular approach
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
10
Approach to Estimate Number of
Collection Points Needed
 Retail model approach – based on paint distribution to
retailers
– Types of distribution establishments
• Retail outlets
• Home centers
• Discount/Dept. stores
• Hardware stores
• Other
– Number of distribution establishments: 36,773
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
11
– Collection sites needed: 12,000
Approach to Estimate Number of
Collection Points Needed
 Incentive based approach – to encourage collection at
non-profits, private, public through financial incentives
 Collection point capacity approach
– Based on the amount of throughput to a facility
(contingent on space available)
– Reverse logic
– Not considered valid approach
– Collection sites needed: 5,000-10,000
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
12
Recommendations: Collection Points
 Collection sites needed: 2,000
o Equal to 0.06 gallons/person (LOW)
 Collection sites needed: 5,000
o Equal to 0.17 gallons/person (HIGH)
 Collection sites needed: 8,000
o Ultimate convenience
 Existing collection sites in US
o 1,500+ (Earth 911 data)
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
13
Transportation and Aggregation
 Assumption: each community type will need at least
one aggregation point  TOTAL: 934 aggregation
points
 Did not include backhauling in discussion
 Next steps:
– Develop cost to aggregate and transport
– Ensure that all transportation types are evaluated
– Check assumption of one aggregation point per
community type
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
14
Processing Facilities
 Surveyed 7 of 9 PPSI paint processors
 All have extra capacity
 Additional capacity considerations:
– Population density (supply)
– Transportation costs (distance for supply to travel)
– End-customer (distance for the final product to
travel)
 Primary barrier to adding new capacity: markets
 Paint processing facilities needed: 3-17
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
15
Facility Design Parameters Based on
Paint Management Hierarchy
Should percentages be changed?
 20% of paint is reused through paint swaps
 65% is recycled into new paint
 8% downcycled into cement additive
 7% disposed
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
16
Curbside Paint Collection
Marion County, Oregon
Marion County OR has collected paint at curb since 2000
2004 – recycled 15,228 gallons
2005 – recycled 28,695 gallons
Paint is put into “tubs” with other recyclables including oil,
batteries, glass, and automotive fluids
 Only 2 gallons of paint per collection
 “Tub” is collected bi-weekly




May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
17
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
18
Hauler Fabricated “Belly Box”
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
19
Marion County, Oregon
Collection Truck – Front Rack - Unloading
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
20
PaintBack Crew Mixing Paint
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
21
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
22
Details of Curbside Collection
in Marion County, Oregon
 Don’t break-out costs for paint collection from other
materials in the bin
 Cost to retrofit truck  $2,000
 Cost to mix paint  $0 – use juvenile detainee labor
 Use paint for municipal purposes and donate the rest to
the public
 Labor, equipment, advertising, cost of buckets per year
equates to $0.63 per gallon to manage!
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
23
Infrastructure Cost Analysis (#5)
Goal:
Determine the cost to implement the Infrastructure
Model over a 5-year period on a national scale.
Method:
Conduct a detailed analysis of costs pertaining to
collecting, reusing, consolidating, transporting,
recycling, and disposing of leftover paint, as well as
capital and administrative costs.
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
24
Connection to LCA/CBA
 The infrastructure project can share data with
the lifecycle project where there is overlap.
 SCS and ERG conference call confirmed that
SCS can deliver data needed for the LCA project
in time to complete the LCA/CBA by November.
 Consultants confident that projects will work well
together.
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
25
Types of Data to be Shared
 Collection Data
– Representative Transportation Distances
• Consumer’s Home to HHW Facility
• HHW Facility to Processing Facility
• HHW Facility to Recycling Facility
– What Regions/Populations densities do these
distances apply?
 Facility Data
– Operational Costs
• Utilities, Raw Materials, Labor
– Construction Costs
• Equipment, permitting, land and building costs
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
26
Ongoing Research Being Tracked
 New Hampshire/Paint Recycling Company Pilot
 Chittenden County VT/ Paint Recycling
Company Pilot
 Florida milk-run collection pilot
 NCPD projects
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
27
New Hampshire: Exporting Post
Consumer Paint for Recycling
 Project Manager is Melanie Wheeler of the State of NH Grant Program
 Objective is to determine economic and administrative feasibility of collecting
paint and exporting to Canada (Paint Recycling Company) for recycling.
 Performance will be measured by comparing cost savings per gallon to
existing program which sends it to incineration.
 Project will be considered successful if the cost of export for recycling is the
same or less than the cost of incineration.
 Will be reviewed by Infrastructure Group for incorporation of any new data into
the Infrastructure Model.
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
28
New Hampshire –
Pilot Project Results






Project completed fall of 2004
Total paint collected 2,094 gallons of paint
Cost to recycle $7,712.25* or $3.68 per gallon
Avoided cost to incinerate approx. $14,000 or $7.40/gal.
Savings of approx. $7,000 (50 percent)
Positive results are in spite of barriers, including:
– 200 miles to transport
– Export rules between US and Canada
*Includes transportation costs
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
29
Chittenden VT and Paint Recycling
Company – Pilot Project
 Project Manager - Jen Holliday, Chittenden Solid
Waste District
 Objective - Collecting paint and shipping to Paint
Recycling Company for recycling.
 Goal - Testing to see if paint recycling is more
cost effective than disposal
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
30
Chittenden VT and Paint Recycling
Company Pilot Project
 FY 2004 and FY 2005 results
 Compared costs of landfilling to paint consolidation into
own product called “Local Color” or export to Canadian
paint recycler
 Shipped total of 9,811 gallons of paint
 Costs per gallon
– Landfill  Cost $2.63/gallon
– Export and Recycle  Cost $1.70/gallon
– Consolidate and Sell  PROFIT $0.79/gallon
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
31
Florida Milk-run Pilot




Rural milk-run collections
Future project - has not received funding to date
Hope to implement late 2006/early 2007
Goal is to provide a $50,000 grant to fund “milk-runs”
where rural areas can have an outlet for paint to be
recycled and then to evaluate the success of the project
by comparing the cost to collect and recycle paint
against current management methods.
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
32
National Council on Paint Disposition
(NCPD) Collection Project
 Project manager is NCPD, Marv Goodman
 Transportation and collection currently underway
 Other portions are being evaluated through
Project Engineers at Rutgers University for
feasibility
 May need additional funding
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
33
Questions
 What data do we need to start the discussions
on Oct. 1, 2006 regarding the development and
financing of the nationally coordinated paint
management system for leftover paint?
 Will the current Scope of Work ensure delivery of
that data?
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
34
Infrastructure Workgroup
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Heidi Sanborn, R3 Consulting Group – Facilitator
Scott Cassel, PSI
Dave Nightingale, WA Ecology & NW Prod. Stewardship Council – Lead, Infrastructure
Alison Keane, NPCA – Lead, Reuse
Dave Darling, NPCA
Pamela McAuley, Hotz Environmental
Mark Kurschner, Product Care Association
Susan Peterson, ICI Canada
Barry Elman, EPA
Jen Holliday, Chittenden County, VT
Theresa Stiner, IA DNR
Georges Portelance, Eco-Peinture
Glenn Gallagher, CIWMB
Mike O’Donnell, Phillips Services Corporation
Bruce Baggenstos, PDCA, California
Curtis Bailey, CB Consulting
Leslie Kline, Fresno County, CA
Pandora Touart, City of Federal Way, WA
Melanie Wheeler, NH DES
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
35
Overview – Reuse Guidance Manual
1. Identifies types of reuse programs as either
paint exchanges, donation/resale, or bulking
2. Asks reader to identify the goals of their program and
choose an infrastructure (permanent/temporary)
3. Identifies federal, state, and local regs. to consider
4. Describes operational needs for facilities and staff
5. Encourages a container management plan
6. Encourages a marketing strategy
7. Provides case studies and resources for further
information
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
36
Reuse Guidance Manual
Goal:
Encourage HHW collection programs to start and/or
expand paint reuse opportunities to maximize reuse and
reduce paint management costs.
Method:
Develop guidance manual on paint reuse for states,
municipalities, non-profit and/or other material reuse
organizations, and other businesses and consumers.
Conduct significant outreach once manual is completed.
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
37
Work Accomplished to Date




Three conference calls.
Completed reuse manual.
Draft Final Report available for release.
No funding remaining on project.
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
38
PPSI Feedback
 Is there any other information that should be
included in the document?
 Do you have any editing/formatting
suggestions?
 Do you have any suggestions for additional
resources?
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
39
Next Steps
 Circulate draft final to PPSI for comments
 Circulate to HHW, PSI, SWANA and state
waste management list serves for review
and feedback
 After public review and comment, finalize
 Post on PSI, NPCA websites – link to
Earth 911
 Additional Promotion of Manual?
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
40
Decisions
 Is this document ready to send to the full PPSI for review
and comment?
 Do we need to develop and fund a pilot project as part of the
outreach component to test the effectiveness of the
document?
 If not, how do we evaluate the success of the manual?
 Is there an opportunity to tie this in with other educational
outreach?
 How do we get additional work done with no funding?
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL
41
Download