WEIMAR – RECOVERY 1923-9 How secure was the economic recovery? Germany’s situation: 1923: Stresemann becomes Chancellor Set end to passive resistance and hyperinflation Fulfilment policy Rentenmark Reichsmark Era of considerable economic advance Dawes Plan (1924): extend repayment period, reparations rearranged , American loans Production and consumption New industries Reduced working hours Balance of trade However, recovery was susceptible to crisis: Compared internationally: economy not flourishing enough Growth unstable Cartelisation monopoly prices Revaluation compensation and higher wages, comparatively low production rate Rationalisation introduction of assembly-line work unemployment Agricultural Crisis: bad harvest + international grain surplus falling prices “Farmer’s revenge” Loans high interest rates, high budget deficit High domestic spending Economic performance mixed but unstable already before Wall Street Crash 1929 However, dependent on American loans Who is responsible? state living beyond its means too much spending wages increased unrelated to productivity thus, low profits, slow growth “sick economy” Lack of entrepreneurial attitude, inadequate investment Government subsidies and cartelisationlow productivity shortage of skilled labour and lack of confidence Did the Weimar welfare state strengthen or weaken the regime? Constitutional welfare state Advance in social services (domestic spending) hospitals, schools... Federal government expenditure financing pensions for war-related citizens (2.5 mio people) 1927 major unemployment insurance law introduced for ca. 1-2 mio unemployed regime suffered from high expectations Reality: 700 000 unemployed citizens could be paid Elite questions regime, too due to high taxation and redistribution Arbitration caused resentment of employers Over-strained welfare state Sources: John Hite/ Chris Hinton (eds.): Weimar and Nazi Germany, London (John Rurray) 2000. http://www.bpb.de/geschichte/nationalsozialismus/