National Debtline Performance Evaluation

advertisement

National Debtline

Performance Evaluation

August 2008

Prepared for:

National Debtline

Prepared in compliance with the International quality standard covering market research,

ISO 20252 by Illuminas, Lion House, 141-145 Curtain Road, London, EC2A 3AR, UK

T +44 (0)20 7909 0929 F +44 (0)20 7909 0921 E info@illuminas-global.com

www.illuminas-global.com

Background: a measure of performance

In order to secure ongoing support for the services offered by

National Debtline, it is considered important to monitor the performance of the service against specific objectives

Research objectives:

 To measure and evaluate the performance of National Debtline

 Specifically, to look at caller satisfaction with the overall service, including the telephone advice service, the email service and the website

 To compare performance measures with previous years to investigate whether any significant changes are evident

 To look at immediate & on-going impact of contact with National Debtline

 In particular, to investigate the impact of contact with NDL on a caller’s ability to manage their money and debt

 To look at any wider issues that may result from contacting NDL and the impact on overall control of finances

2

A quantitative approach providing robust measurement

 Performance evaluation

 15-minute telephone interviews with individuals who had contacted National Debtline between

September 2007 and February 2008

250 interviews with callers from England & Wales

50 interviews with callers from Scotland

Total 300 interviews

 Longitudinal impact evaluation

 15-minute telephone interviews with individuals who had contacted National Debtline 2 years ago, 4 years ago and 5 years ago

2 years on callers :

Participated in performance evaluation survey ‘06

4 years on callers:

Participated in longitudinal impact survey ‘06 and performance evaluation ‘04

5 years on callers:

Participated in longitudinal impact survey ’06 and ‘04 and performance evaluation ‘03

Total 90 interviews

Total 41 interviews

Total 31 interviews

 Website pop-up survey

Pop up survey on NDL website

3

Total 450 responded

Methodology

 All fieldwork conducted by The Wire, Illuminas’s own telephone and online interviewing unit

 Data sources:

 Performance evaluation:

 Caller details provided by National Debtline

 All provided consent for details to be passed on to a third party for purpose of research

 Longitudinal impact:

 Those who participated in previous waves of research and agreed to be re-contacted - 162 interviews achieved

 Website evaluation:

 Pop-up placed on National Debtline website during May – July 2008

4

Overview of Performance Evaluation

 Executive summary

 Part I: Performance evaluation

 Performance evaluation: key measures

 Making the first call: awareness and experience

 Delivering advice: literature and website

 Part II: Website evaluation

 Part III: Longitudinal impact evaluation

 Longitudinal impact evaluation: key measures

 Practical long-term benefits

 Wider impact of contact

 Literature

 Summary and conclusions

 Appendix

 Performance evaluation

 Website evaluation

 Longitudinal evaluation

5

Executive Summary

Executive Summary: A continued success story

 Continuing short and long-term satisfaction:

 Both recent callers to National Debtline and callers who used the service some time ago report high levels of satisfaction with the service received:

 …95% of callers satisfied who used the service during 2008

 …94% of callers satisfied from two years ago

 …92% of callers satisfied from four years ago

 …97% of callers satisfied from five years ago

 High levels of recommendation:

 Majority find the information provided by National Debtline extremely helpful and are keen to recommend it

 75% of 2008 callers found the advice to be extremely helpful

 85% of 2008 callers would definitely recommend the service to someone experiencing debt difficulty

 Reducing debts over time:

 For many, speaking to National Debtline prompts them to take positive action to reduce their debt

 Of those callers who spoke to National Debtline 2 years ago, 19% no longer have any outstanding debt, while 27% of callers from 4 years ago and 32% from 5 years ago no longer have any outstanding debt

 Use of the website:

 Website usage continues to increase in terms of first time and repeat usage – and is rated now even more highly than two years ago, particularly in terms of ease of use (a major positive attitudinal shift seen among callers in Scotland)

 Areas for consideration:

 Those with new debt are much more likely to be those who first called five years ago (and are less likely to be confident about managing money and feeling in control of life). Proximity to the advice engenders confidence and control

7

Executive Summary: Performance Evaluation (I)

 Continuing high levels of satisfaction and recommendation in 2008

 78% of callers were very satisfied with the service

 75% of callers found the information and advice provided to be extremely helpful

 85% of callers would definitely recommend the service

 Encouragingly, satisfaction amongst callers in Scotland is now largely on a par with callers from England

 72% of callers in Scotland were now very satisfied with the service versus 66% in 2006

 78% now found the information and advice provided extremely helpful versus 66% in 2006

 A large proportion of callers were prompted to take direct action after contact

 70% of callers contacted the companies they owed money to and 76% of these callers came to an arrangement with the companies using the advice provided by NDL

 91% of those callers who contacted and made arrangements with companies have kept to the agreement

 Contact also had a positive attitudinal effect on managing debt

 90% of callers agreed they felt more knowledgeable about financial matters overall

 85% of callers agreed they felt less likely to find themselves in a similar situation again

 84% of callers agreed they felt more confident about managing money in general

8

Executive Summary: Performance Evaluation (II)

 Mixed levels of awareness of what the service offered before contact

 39% of callers knew nothing about what the service offered when they first called NDL

 59% of callers knew that National Debtline offered advice on handling debts

 The Internet is an ever-increasing source of awareness of National Debtline

 27% of callers first heard about NDL via the internet (versus 22%, 15% and 11% previously)

 A vast increase in proportion of callers able to reach an adviser the first time they called

 80% of callers got through first time (versus only 53% in 2006)

 High levels of praise reserved for NDL advisers

 80% of callers strongly agreed that the adviser was easy to talk to

 84% of callers strongly agreed that the adviser dealt with their situation in a professional way

 65% strongly agreed they had a better understanding of how to manage debt as a result of NDL

 Increased use of website continues in 2008

 Website rated more highly against all performance measures

 Note: substantial positive shift in scores amongst callers in Scotland

 Overall, and in terms of contact with advisers, literature and website

9

Performance Evaluation: Website Evaluation (I)

 Website searches are an extremely effective method of drawing people to the website

 Half (50%) of website users found the NDL address via an internet search

 However, a significant proportion (23%) experienced problems finding the NDL website

 Website being used even more fully in 2008

 59% of users this time versus 38% in 2006 had searched for information/ advice about debt

 NDL clients are almost twice as likely this time to have: viewed templates; downloaded templates; accessed factsheets; used budget sheet; etc

 Some evidence to suggest the website is assisting more users to take productive action

 48% of users this time versus 36% in 2006 state are going to contact creditors

 Reactions to the website even more positive in 2008

 E.g. 80% of users this time versus 71% in 2006 rated the website as “good” or “excellent” for providing easy-to-understand information

10

Executive Summary: Longitudinal Evaluation (I)

 High levels of satisfaction and recommendation remain over time

 98% of callers from 2 years ago, 95% from 4 years ago, and 96% from 5 years ago were satisfied with the service they received from National Debtline

 98% of callers from 2 years ago, 97% from 4 years ago, and 100% from 5 years ago would recommend the service

 Previous callers appear successful in reducing their debts

 19% of callers from 2 years ago no longer have an outstanding debt

 27% of callers from 4 years ago no longer have an outstanding debt

 32% of callers from 5 years ago no longer have an outstanding debt

 A high proportion of respondents are able to maintain payment arrangements over time

 78% of callers from 4 years ago contacted companies they owed money to and 81% of these callers came to an arrangement with these companies

 Of those callers who had made arrangements, 92% kept to these arrangements. The majority of these arrangements had been made over two years ago

11

Executive Summary: Longitudinal Evaluation (II)

 Respondents report that contacting NDL engenders self-sufficiency in financial matters

 Around 6 in 10 callers from 2-4 years ago strongly agreed they were more in control, more knowledgeable, or more confident about managing their money. However, those from 5 years ago were slightly less likely to strongly agree (and are more likely to have new debt)

 Evidence suggests there are wider consequences of debt

 36% had visited a doctor because of the stress of debt

 23% had time off work as a result of stress

 NDL advice has a positive impact on callers’ emotional states in particular

 9 in 10 of callers from 2 to 5 years ago state this

 Literature provided by National Debtline is shown to be of high value over time

 83% of callers from 2 years ago and 84% from 4 and 5 years ago reported that they read the literature and stored it for future reference

 38% of these callers have looked at the information since they first stored it

12

Part I:

Performance Evaluation

Performance Evaluation:

Key Measures

The service continues to generate high levels of continued satisfaction amongst callers

Overall satisfaction remains at the same level as 2006 (95% satisfied)

 Callers in Scotland appear less content than callers in England and Wales, albeit satisfaction levels in Scotland are increasing after a slight dip in 2006

 Overall, how satisfied with service you received from National Debtline?

Very satisfied Fairly satisfied Neither/ nor Fairly dissatisfied Very dissatisfied

78 17 3 11

%

Base: all (300)

% very satisfied

2008

2006

2005

2004

Total

78

79

79

74

15

Scotland

72

66

76

69

Base: Scotland (50)

Reasons for satisfaction (I)

I was impressed with the level of professionalism, comprehensive knowledge and response

They gave me the information that I needed; they were very helpful, very pleasant and understanding

They went extra mile for me… they were very informative and sent everything out that they said they would do

They are readily available to call without an appointment

Whenever I phone they are very understanding. They don't try to hurry you; they give you all the time in the world, are very professional and very effective

I felt that they knew what they were talking about and that it was objective

I phoned them up in distress; they were able to calm me down, listen to me and then explain the procedure. Sometimes I got lost and they very carefully explained it again…they held my hand all the way

They were very friendly, non judgmental and they put me at ease

They were very understanding, gave a personal touch and didn't make you feel awkward or uncomfortable; they were all very polite and listened very well

They spoke to me in a language that I understood

16

Reasons for satisfaction (II)

It is nice to be able to speak to people who are very neutral

They were there every step of the way, I only needed to phone them in order to calm me down

They made me feel equipped to deal with the people who were taking financial advantage

National Debtline put everything into perspective for me

You are not treated just as a number - you are treated with a bit of respect

They were polite, helpful and not judgmental; providing great advice, and being really understanding…They were wonderful and supportive

It was like speaking to a friend

17

They put me on the right track and enabled me to organise things properly…things are now controllable whereas before they weren’t

Excellent advice and step by step procedures

Reasons for dissatisfaction

They explained everything fairly clearly and gave me ideas on what to do but didn't answer all of my questions

I suppose they didn't really tell me anything that I wasn't aware of

The leaflets they promised they would send never arrived

They were pretty good when I spoke to them on the phone but they did not follow up too

Although they sent out a very useful information pack, I could have done with a bit more follow up from them well

I think I was expecting a little bit more - personal advice rather than the basics

The adviser was quite patronising - he spoke to me as if he thought I was a bit of an idiot because I was in debt

When I wanted to get in touch with them I could never get a reply at the end of the phone, it was an answering machine

18

NDL is often praised for helping manage debt

 Majority of respondents find service of considerable assistance, which translates into high recommendation

 Thinking about all the information and advice you received specifically from National Debtline, how helpful was it to you in dealing with your debt problem at the time?

Extremely helpful

Extremely helpful Fairly helpful Not very helpful Not at all helpful

75 20

Base: all: 300

3 1 %

2008

2006

2005

2004

Total

75

75

79

77

Scotland

78

66

76

69

 If someone you knew found themselves in difficulty with debt, how likely would you be to recommend

National Debtline as a source of advice?

Definitely recommend

Definitely recommend Probably Probably not Definitely not recommend

85 13

Base: all: 300

11

%

2008

2006

2005

2004

Total

85

89

89

87

Scotland

80

82

86

81

19

Why recommend NDL? (I)

People on the phone are very sympathetic, they don't patronise you in any way

Both the people I spoke to were non judgmental and that's very important

They gave a few options…an informed choice, they didn't make decisions for you

The information I've received and the confidence they've given me to get my dignity back

You realise you're not the only fish in the sea, you find out there are a lot of people in the same situation

It is a very good starting point because they help to clarify things that may be bothering you unnecessarily. They have a better understanding of all these things because they do it on a day to day basis

The advice is good and helpful, it is a whole weight off your shoulders

National Debtline explained my problems to me in simple language and made it simpler for me to understand where I was going. I phoned them as a last resort; it should have been my first resort

Overall it's an exceptional service…it is an organisation that is helping people in despair

20

Why recommend NDL? (II)

When you find yourself in a situation where you owe money, it is better to take positive action…The advice I was given enabled me to do this rather than sitting down worrying and hoping the problem would go away…it won't go away

I felt that once I talked to the debt line I was able to go back to my creditors and talk with more authority

They take away the worry…and give you a light at the end of the tunnel

It was easy to deal with the people at NDL, you feel comfortable talking to them because you feel they are on your side

The advice is clear, concise, helpful… knowledgeable and well considered.

The advisers are friendly and sensitive and if, at any point, they feel unable to respond to your query they consult a colleague who can help them give the correct information. It makes you feel less alone, it gives you the sense that there is someone who will support you and argue your case

…or why would you not recommend them?

It was a bit like a financial

Samaritans…they help you at every turn

In the first instance, I had to make four phone calls to actually get through to them. When I spoke to them about the situation, they seemed to feel that I could manage it myself by sending me through an information pack which I didn't really want

21

NDL contact encourages repayment of debt

 National Debtline continues to successfully assist callers to take direct action

 After contact with National Debtline, 53% of callers took action to repay their debts and have successfully kept to these arrangements

Did you yourself contact any of the companies you owed money to after receiving advice from National Debtline?

YES: 70%

Base: all (300)

And as a result of this, did you come to any agreement or make any new arrangements with the companies you owed money to using the advice provided by National Debtline?

YES: 76%

Base: all who contacted companies (209)

Not contacted companies owed

YES Total Scotland

2008

2006

2005

2004

70

72

68

63

68

60

52

56

YES

Not come to arrangement

Total Scotland

2008

2006

2005

2004

76

71

68

81

62

70

62

70

At time, any apply…

On DMP

Already declared bankrupt

Had IVA with companies owed money to

Contacted companies owed money to

Attempt to make any new arrangements with companies owed money to using advice provided by National Debtline:

Y es - attempted

53%

%

17

1

13

26

No

47% And have you managed to keep to the arrangement which you agreed to?

YES: 91%

Base: all who contacted companies and came to agreement: 158

YES

2008

2006

2005

2004

Total

91

84

86

88

Scotland

86

86

100

95

22

NDL advice has a profound impact on future money management

 Contact had a positive attitudinal effect on managing debt, and empowered callers

I am more knowledgeable about financial matters overall

I feel less likely to find myself in a similar situation again

I feel more confident about managing my money in general

I feel more in control of my life as a result

I think it is more likely I will repay my debt

Strongly agree

62

53

58

56

68

Base: all (weighted): 300

23

Agree

28

20

26

28

17

% Strongly agree

Total Scotland

62

59

56

58

68

75

64

65

58

60

54

57

56

60

56

58

53

60

54

56

52

60

56

60

68

64

65

75

62

52

54

50

48

56

58

67

54

46

53

58

Year

2008

2006

2005

2004

2008

2006

2005

2004

2008

2006

2005

2004

2008

2006

2005

2004

2008

2006

2005

2004

The importance attached to the contact

 How would you describe how the service provided by National Debtline has helped you in terms of managing money and debt?

It has helped me realise that you can spend too much money too quickly on a credit card…It is so easy to get into debt and a lot harder to get out of it

The budget plan that National

Debtline sent to me and I downloaded actually gave me a realistic understanding of my entire financial position

They have been instrumental in everything

I have had to deal with; they have helped me tremendously. They have encouraged me to deal with things straight away…however little, just to make sure every payment is made on time

It has helped me understand the pitfalls of borrowing on top of loans and how that can put me into huge debt without noticing

It has encouraged us to set a specific budget per month and we're now very strict with keeping to it

I feel like I am working for me now and not just working for everyone else to take my money

It simplified things and made things easier to understand; the information was very clear

24

Making the first call:

Awareness and Experience

Most are aware NDL is a debt advisory service; unsurprisingly knowledge somewhat unrefined at first call stage

 Mixed levels of awareness surrounding what the service offered:

 Just over half (59%) of callers knew that National Debtline offered advice on handling debts

 39% of callers knew nothing about what the service offered when they first called

 Internet an increasingly important source of awareness

 How did you first hear about National Debtline?

27 2008 = 27%

2006 = 22%

2004 = 15%

2003 = 11%

Other sources include:

• Bank/ building society

• Radio

• Poster/ leaflet

• Creditors

%

13 13

12

10

9

6

Internet search Citizens Advice

Bureau/ other free agency

Article in paper/ magazine

Friend/ relative

26

TV Yellow pages Other telephone directory

Base: all (weighted): 300

NDL is now more accessible; moreover, vast majority of callers were given most of the advice they needed

 A vast increase in proportion of callers able to reach an adviser first time they called

 Once they had spoken to an adviser, majority of callers happy with service they received

 94% of callers felt that length of their first call was about right

 51% given all the advice they needed, with a further 39% given most of the advice they required

 Thinking about when you first rang National Debtline, how many times did you have to ring before you got through to an adviser?

Once Twice Three times Four times Five times More than five times Don’t know

2008 80 9 4 2 1 4 %

2006

53 16 10

 How many times have you spoken to National Debtline?

Once Twice Three times Four times More than 4 times

7 3 7 3

%

Base: all (300)

39 24 16 7 14

%

Base: all (300)

27

NDL is often the first port of call for debt advice

 National Debtline often first point of contact for debt advice (for two-thirds, as in 2006)

Yes No

Had you contacted anyone else for debt advice before you spoke to National Debtline ?

32 68 %

Base: all (300)

 Who else have you contacted?

Citizens Advice Bureau

Debt consultancy service

CCCS

Other free debt advice service

Other fee charging company

Payplan

Bank

1

Family/ Friends

1

Other

2

5

6

12

12

48

20

As in previous waves,

CAB is most common alternative source of debt advice

Other includes: trading standards, solicitor, other websites

%

Base: all who had contacted someone else prior: 95

7 0

6 0

%

5 0

4 0

3 0

2 0

10

0

10 0

9 0

8 0

Used a fee-charging debt consultancy service, before spoke to NDL?

Yes, using

10

90

No

28

First call with NDL rated highly

 High levels of praise for contact enjoyed with National Debtline

 Respondents were asked to think back to how they felt after their first call with National Debtline and to rate the service on a number of measures:

Strongly agree

%

Agree

Year

% Strongly agree

Total Scotland

The advisor was easy to talk to

80 15

2008

2006

2005

2004

80

83

82

81

76

80

76

69

You had a sense of confidence in the service

72 21

2008

2006

2005

2004

72

69

70

67

76

64

62

63

You felt you had made a positive step towards managing your debt

68 22

2008

2006

2005

2004

68

69

69

65

70

64

49

56

Base: all (300)

29

Vast majority proffer strong praise for NDL advisers

 Service successfully provides strong support to callers, both in terms of emotional assistance and practical support

 Interpretation and application of advice is likely to be more challenging for some callers

 Callers in Scotland views largely on a par with callers in England and Wales

 Callers in Scotland this time more likely to strongly agree than in 2006 that adviser understood their situation, and dealt with problem in a sensitive way

 No notable shift in views of England and Wales callers against each performance measure

The advisor dealt with your situation in a professional way

%

Strongly agree

84

Agree

14

The advisor was knowledgeable

The advisor dealt with your problem in a sensitive way

You felt the advisor understood your situation

The advice provided was clear and easy to understand

You had a better understanding of how to manage your debt as a result of contacting National Debtline

79

79

77

74

65

Base: all (weighted): 300

30

24

16

16

14

19

‘08 ‘06 ‘05 ‘04

Total

Scotland

Total

Scotland

Total

Scotland

84

76

79

78

79

84

85

78

82

80

80

74

84

84

78

76

81

80

Total

Scotland

Total

Scotland

77

74

74

68

76

62

76

71

76

70

74

70

Total

Scotland

65

64

61

56

67

62

Base: Callers in Scotland: 50

66

50

75

67

75

65

83

71

77

63

77

67

Service improvements

 What could National Debtline do to improve the service they offer?

I think that some of the advisers are a bit abrupt Get more operatives…it’s getting harder and harder to get in contact with them

It’s a pity that they are not better known so that they could help others

Sometimes it takes a long time to get hold of them

More face to face contact

Better advertisement of what they can actually do for you

A follow up call to see how someone is getting on

It is important to let people know that it is free, impartial and not for profit

If they could provide a bit more information for people at the early stages E.g In school

31

Only a minority are currently on a Debt Management

Programme. NDL less likely to be involved this time

 24% of respondents were on a debt management programme at the time of responding to the survey (no significant difference to 2006)

 NDL acting as intermediary in set-up by CCCS has halved

 Set up by CCCS/ Payplan after NDL referral down a third

 Who was it that set up the debt management arrangement for you?

%

Another debt management company

30

31

Fee- charging debt management company

Base: on DMP

Yes, fee charging

No

Total

21

43%

57%

Set up by CCCS/ Payplan after being referred to them by National Debtline

28

44

Set up by CCCS without

National Debtline acting as intermediary 7

18

Can't remember/ Not sure

10

13

Payplan without National

Debtline acting as intermediary

9

11

2008

2006

Base: all on debt management programme (2006: 75; 2008: 71)

32

Delivering Advice:

Literature and Website

The quality of the literature is high

 Vast majority (92%) recall receiving literature after having spoken to NDL

 Most rate the literature very highly against all assessment criteria

 Big shift in levels of satisfaction with the literature amongst callers in Scotland – significantly more likely to state very good against each measure

 Thinking about information which was sent to you, how would you rate it in terms of the following?

% Very good Good

‘08 ‘06 ‘05 ‘04

The amount of information provided

75 19

Total

Scotland

75

78

74

67

73

70

75

72

How clearly presented the information was

How useful the information given was in helping you to manage debt

How relevant the information provided was to your situation

How easy it was to understand

72

70

69

20

18

22

68

Base: all who recall literature sent:275

34

20

Total

Scotland

72

74

73

65

70

65

68

57

Total

Scotland

70

72

69

57

67

67

72

59

Total

Scotland

69

78

70

63

69

63

68

61

Total

Scotland

68

72

66

61

Base: Scotland: 46

64

65

65

54

Half of callers visited the website - mostly before speaking to NDL, further visits followed from most

Growth – albeit less marked this time – in visiting National Debtline website

 47% of callers now, compared to 43% and 24% in 2006 and 2004 respectively

 Majority (71%) of those who have visited, visit again (22% five or more times)

 Multiple motivations/ usage of website – finding out about service offered by NDL, search for debt information/ advice, and find NDL telephone number most frequently cited

%

Finding out more about the service National Debtline offers

Searching for information and advice about debt

Finding the telephone number for National Debtline

Using the personal budget sheet

Accessing the factsheets

Viewing/ downloading sample letters

Downloading information packs

Requesting documents to be posted to you

Emailing National Debtline for advice 6

19

37

49

48

46

74

73

72

Did you visit the website…

Before calling NDL: 69%

After calling NDL: 20%

Before and after: 10%

Base: all who have visited NDL website: 140

(NB: Prompted response) 35

The website is rated even better than before, particularly amongst callers in Scotland

 Website even more likely to be viewed as clear and effective – most state “very good”

 Major positive attitudinal shift amongst callers in Scotland about website

 How would you rate the website in terms of the following?

The amount of information provided

Very good

65

Good

24

Total

Scotland

‘08 ‘06

65

70

61

45

How useful the information was in helping you to manage your debt

59 28

How clearly presented the information was

How easy it was to understand

59 34

62

%

Base: all who have visited website: 140

36

29

Total

Scotland

59

57

55

38

Total

Scotland

59

57

53

41

Total

Scotland

62

70

53

34

Base: all callers in Scotland who have visited website: 29 in 2006 and 23 in 2008

(base too small in previous waves)

Part II:

Website Evaluation

Search engines remain the dominant means by which the National Debtline website address is found

 Half find the website by searching though an internet search engine, with a further 1 in 7 via the Citizens Advice Bureau. No significant change between 2006 and 2008

 How did you find the National Debtline website address?

47%

50%

2006 2008

Other sources mentioned:

Yellow pages

Credit reference agencies

Moneysavingexpert.com

Through work/ job

11%

13%

11%

13%

6% 6%

4% 4%

Internet search engine

Citizens Advice

Bureau

Another website

Friend/ relative TV/ media

2% 2%

Article in paper/ magazine

2%

3%

1%

2%

3% 3%

Financial advisor/ bank

People I owe money to

Something else

Base: all who completed on-line survey (475 in 2006, 450 in 2008)

38

A significant proportion experienced problems finding the National Debtline website

Q. Some people have stated that they had problems finding the official National Debtline website and tried other websites with similar names or website addresses first, did you experience this problem ?

Yes, experienced such problems No, didn't experience such problems

23% 77%

Base: All respondents who found the website via Internet search engine (220)

Q. Experiences and details of other websites tried first?

Other sites charge/ aren't free

Other websites come up first/ at the top of the list

Others with similar name 18%

39%

31%

Confused 10%

Other

39

18%

Base: All respondents who found the website via

Internet search engine and had difficulty finding it (51)

Website visits are mostly for finance/ debt advice

Most visit website to look for help and advice on the financial/ debt problems they are experiencing; one in five visit specifically to access the letter templates

Financial/ debt problems

For the letter templates

Research/ information

To help a friend/ family member/ client

For a budget plan/ sheet 4%

Looking for/ downloading factsheets

2%

8%

12%

Info about CCJs 1%

Other

Base: all who completed on-line survey (450)

8%

20%

40

48%

I've just had a threatening phone call and need some advice urgently

I need further help in writing letters and the info on the website is really really good and helpful

I’m reaching the end of my tether with debt and have finally decided to take the bull by the horns and do something about it!

The proportion of callers who had previously contacted National

Debtline increased - both by phone and visiting the website

47%

64%

No

Intend to

Yes

16%

21%

37%

14%

2006 2008

Base: all who completed on-line survey (475 in 2006, 450 in 2008)

Have you spoken to

National Debtline advisers by phone?

41

71%

50%

50%

29%

2006 2008

Have you visited the

National Debtline website before?

Though numbers of callers contacting other advice sources is largely consistent, those who do so are contacting a wider range of sources than before

Q. Have you contacted anyone else for advice on managing money and debt?

2006 2008

Yes No Yes No

31% 69% 34% 66%

Citizens Advice Bureau

Who else have you contacted ?

36%

36% Debt consultancy service

Friends/ family

CCCS

Bank

Payplan

Accountant 3%

Solicitor 1%

Lawyer 1%

19%

16%

14%

11%

Local council 1%

Other 11%

Who else have you contacted ?

Citizens Advice Bureau

Debt consultancy service

Friends/ family

CCCS

Bank

16%

12%

25%

Payplan

Accountant 3%

13%

Solicitor 5%

Lawyer 1%

Local council 4%

Other 7%

48%

42%

Base: all who contacted someone else for advice (146 in 2006, 154 in 2008)

42

The website is being used for a broader range of purposes than before

Searching for information and advice about debt

2006

2008

Finding out more about the service

National Debtline offers

2006

2008

Viewing/ downloading sample letters

2006

2008

Downloading self help information pack

2006

2008

Accessing the factsheets

2006

2008

Have used

38%

59%

28%

50%

29%

43%

24%

45%

27%

30%

39%

43%

35%

Intend to use

50%

28%

34%

28%

28%

45% 26%

Base: all who completed on-line survey (475 in 2006, 450 in 2008)

43

The proportion who have used the website for a variety of purposes has markedly increased since

2006. And there are still more who intend to use each service

Number of uses to which website is put to is growing

 Further evidence of website serving plethora of needs

23%

Have used Intend to use

38%

Using the personal budget sheet

2006

2008

39% 29%

Base: all who completed on-line survey

(475 in 2006, 450 in 2008)

Finding the telephone number for National Debtline

2006

21% 33%

2008 36% 32%

2006

6% 25%

Requesting documents to be posted to you 2008

18% 26%

2006

7% 29%

Emailing National

Debtline for advice

2008

10% 33%

Did you find what you were looking for?

Yes

84%

No

16%

Base: all who completed on-line survey (450)

44

The website is consistently rated even more highly than in 2006 (across all measures)

Already positive in 2006, perceptions of every area of the website have improved in the last two years

 How do you rate the website in terms of:

Easy to understand information

Amount of information

General content

Presentation of information

Ease of use

Ease of finding information

Design

2008

2006

2008

2006

2008

2006

2008

2006

2008

2006

2008

2006

2008

2006

Good

38%

42%

40%

40%

40%

42%

38%

44%

38%

43%

37%

44%

41%

41%

Excellent

42%

29%

29%

40%

39%

28%

36%

26%

36%

26%

36%

24%

26%

21%

Base: all who completed on-line survey (475 in 2006, 450 in 2008)

45

Additional user comments

Feedback regarding site is mainly positive, with some small criticisms

An excellent source of reliable information

Your interactive personal budget sheet is a marvel

I think your service should be in receipt of some sort of recognition for the support and help you are clearly providing.

Thank you thank you thank you thank you!!!

Extremely helpful & knowledgeable.

Thank you

I’d like the budget sheet to be downloadable in

Excel so it can be altered/ managed. I had to print out a few before I got it about right

Much needed and useful resource for both the general public looking for information and advice and for advisers to use as a resource tool

I think that your fact sheets are the best that are available

Make it easier to find from an internet search engine

Fantastic service that has helped me more than once!

It should have a discussion forum so we can all help each other more

I have emailed National Debtline several weeks ago now, and have not received any response - this is very disappointing given the quality of service in terms of advice available on the web pages

46

There has been a clear increase since 2006 in the number of callers who state that they intend to contact their creditors following advice

 Sizeable growth in number planning to contact creditors. Similar proportion now versus 2006 intend to complete a budget form or contact National Debtline next

 What is the next step you are going to take in terms of managing your money and debt?

48%

2006 2008

36% 36%

35% 35%

25%

18%

12%

14%

11%

13%

9%

8%

4%

2%

Contact your creditors

Complete a budget form

Telephone

National Debtline

Visit another money and debt advice website

Base: all who completed on-line survey (475 in

2006, 450 in 2008)

(NB: Prompted responses)

Consult bank/ lawyer/ other professional service

47

Telephone another money and debt advice service

Email National

Debtline

*1

Something else

*1 Addition to 2008 questionnaire

Part III:

Longitudinal Impact

Evaluation

Longitudinal Impact

Evaluation:

Key Measures

Impact of NDL service is deep and long-lasting

Positive impact of contact with National

Debtline has lasting effect, and does not appear to weaken over time

 Over three quarters rated advice/ information first received as extremely helpful in dealing with their debt at that time

2 years on

4 years on

5 years on

2 years on

Very satisfied

72%

Fairly satisfied

22% 94%

4 years on 85% 7%

92%

5 years on 68% 29% 97%

Extremely helpful

77%

80%

77%

Fairly helpful

21%

15%

19%

98%

95%

96%

And satisfaction with all elements of service remains broad over time

 Intensity of satisfaction marginally higher amongst first contacted 4 years back

And virtually all would recommend

National Debtline to someone they knew in difficulty with debt

 Again deep felt and lasting

2 years on

4 years on

5 years on

Definitely recommend

89%

85%

Probably recommend

9%

12%

98%

97%

97% 3% 100%

Base: All 2 years on (90), All 4 years on (41 ), All 5 years on (31)

50

Debt is being successfully managed over time

Previous callers appear to be successfully reducing their debts over time

Proportion of respondents who currently have outstanding debt

81%

73%

68%

Of those who have outstanding debt, the majority (76%) are dealing solely with the same debt as before.

Those with new debt were much more likely to be those who first called five years ago

2 years on 4 years on 5 years on

Base: All 2 years on (90), All 4 years on (41 ), All 5 years on (31)

51

After initial contact with NDL, most agree – and then maintain – arrangements with creditors

 Initial contact appears to help prompt action towards reducing debt

 Over time respondents are able to maintain these arrangements

 A small pocket of ‘5yrs on’ clients required recent new arrangements

Action taken after initial NDL contact:

Contacted companies to whom money was owed?

Two years on: 70%

Four years on: 78%

Five years on: 61%

Base: All 2 years on (90), All 4 years on

(41 ), All 5 years on (31)

Came to an agreement/ made new arrangement using NDL advice?

Two years on: 81%

Four years on: 81%

Five years on: 89%

Base: all came to agreement 2 yrs

(63), 4 yrs (32) and 5 yrs (19)

Attempt to make any new arrangements using NDL advice?

35%

Base: all not come to arrangement (20)

Kept to the agreed arrangement?

Two years on: 90% Four years on: 92% Five years on: 94%

How long have you had this arrangement?

Less than 6 months: 6%

6-12 months: 24%

Longer than 1 year: 48%

Longer than 2 years: 22%

How long have you had this arrangement?

Less than 6 months: 5%

6-12 months: 5%

Longer than 1 year: 35%

Longer than 2 years: 55%

How long have you had this arrangement?

Less than 6 months: 25%

6-12 months: 19%

Longer than 1 year: 6%

Longer than 2 years: 50%

Base: all who came to an arrangement with creditors and kept to it: Two years on (46), four years on (20) and 5 years on (16)

52

Of those callers who didn’t contact companies to whom they owed money after NDL advice, most had already contacted them or had existing arrangements in place

Situation when received advice…

 24% had not contacted companies owed money to after receiving advice

At time, any apply…

Base:

I had already contacted companies owed money to

On DMP

Had IVA with companies owed money to

Already declared bankrupt

None of above applied

Other help

53

%

(48)

27

25

15

6

19

8

NDL advice helped the vast majority to manage money and debt on an ongoing basis – and change their life

How helpful has the information and advice from National Debtline been in helping you deal with money and debt on an ONGOING BASIS?

Extremely helpful Fairly helpful Not very helpful Not all helpful

2 years on

66% 26% 6% 2%

4 years on

65% 33% 2%

5 years on

73% 17% 10%

Base: All 2 years on (90), All 4 years on (41 ), All 5 years on (31)

 How has National Debtline affected you in the widest sense ?

Four years on: 7.4

Five years on: 6.9

% scoring 7+ (major impact):

• 2 yrs on – 71%

• 4 yrs on – 78%

• 5 yrs on – 61%

Two years on: 7.5

No impact on you whatsoever

1

54

5

Fundamentally changed your life

10

Practical long-term benefits

NDL advice is valuable in dealing with the immediate problem - and its impact remains valuable over time

Contacting NDL was a positive step towards managing your debt

Took action on managing debt as a direct result of contact with NDL

You have a better understanding of how to manage your debt as a result of contacting NDL

2 years ago

4 years ago

5 years ago

Strongly agree

55%

63%

63%

68%

76%

80%

70%

71%

68%

88%

86%

78%

84%

80%

78%

Total agree

90%

92%

87%

Base: All 2 years on (90), All 4 years on (41 ), All 5 years on (31)

56

Similarly, contacting NDL is often felt to engender self-sufficiency in financial matters

 Callers from 5+ years ago are less likely to strongly “feel more in control of (their) life” or “more confident about managing (their) money”; especially if acquired new debt since the call

2 years ago

4 years ago

Total agree

I feel less likely to find myself in a similar situation

5 years ago

% Strongly agree

56%

70%

90%

76%

61% 80%

I feel more in control of my life as a result

42%

63%

61%

90%

78%

77%

I am more knowledgeable about financial matters overall

61%

61%

58%

88%

85%

81%

I feel more confident about managing my money in general

57

48%

60%

61%

89%

81%

80%

Base: All 2 years on (90), All 4 years on (41 ), All 5 years on (31)

How has the service helped?

It has turned my life around. The whole situation terrified me and I didn't believe that there was a way out…I can now handle my finances

It alerted me to or rather clarified what my options were. I was not aware of the concept of prioritising, paying off one kind of debt over another

They've helped me considerably by talking me through it, both managing it and coping with it

It taught me a very valuable lesson in life; my attitude to money is now very different and I would never ever be in debt again

NDL helped me to look at what money was coming in and what was going out and now I seem to be managing it better…I have cut all my credit cards up

It made me unbury my head from the sand and made me face my commitments

It has enabled me to move on with my life

Extremely helpful because everything was put into black and white and I could choose which option to go for

58

It certainly took the pressure off me - it feels like a bit of a victory

It has made me realise how silly I've been in the past handling money and finances - I won't be getting into debt again

Wider impact of contact

NDL advice has a positive impact on most aspects of well-being

Emotional or mental state

Overall well being

Overall personal confidence

Quality of family relationships

Physical health

Work and employment

2 years ago

4 years ago

5 years ago

% Positive impact

89%

90%

90%

Positive

89

90

90

No difference

Negative

9

10

6

2

-

3

44%

48%

56%

69%

76%

81%

88%

64%

76%

74%

83%

81%

87%

93%

94%

-

2

-

1

-

-

2

2

-

1

-

-

1

-

-

54

41

52

34

24

26

29

15

19

23

12

19

12

7

6

44

56

48

64

76

74

69

83

81

76

88

81

87

93

94

 36% had visited Doctor because of stress caused by being in debt

 23% had time off work as a result of stress

60

No notable variation by longevity

Literature

Literature is highly valued; over time, recall, engagement and value are exceptionally high

 High proportion of respondents keeping original literature confirms its value among National Debtline callers, even over time

 Over 92% of callers recalled receiving literature after their first contact with National Debtline

 What did you do with the information you received?

Read it and acted on it

83%

Not read it but kept for future reference

9%

84% of callers from 4 and 5 years ago reported that they read and acted on the information, reinforcing its long-term value

Read it and threw it away

7%

Throw it away without reading

1%

Base: All recall received postal information (149)

 38% have looked at this information since they first received and stored it (36% amongst 5 years on) – further evidence of its longevity

62

Summary and

Conclusions

Conclusions: service is consistently strong; callers are satisfied; debt is being reduced over time

 High levels of satisfaction continue, over the long and short terms

 78% ‘very satisfied’ with overall service in 2008

 85% of 2008 callers ‘would definitely recommend’ service

 The majority of callers take some form of positive direct action after speaking to National Debtline

 53% of callers in 2008 took action to repay debts and have successfully kept to arrangements

 Respondents report feeling empowered to deal with financial matters following contact with NDL

 90% of 2008 callers felt more knowledgeable about financial matters

 85% of 2008 callers felt less likely to find themselves in a similar situation again

 Major positive shifts include:

 Higher website rating - more effective, clearer and easier to use with services used more fully

 Callers in Scotland are now more satisfied – largely on a par with England & Wales re. adviser, literature and website experiences

 Improved ability to reach an adviser first time

 Areas for consideration

 New debt levels seen amongst those who first called five years ago – this group appears less confident and less in control

64

Performance Evaluation:

Appendix Information

Only a minority contacted other advice sources –

CAB and CCCS mostly

 Only a minority sought additional advice once they had contacted National Debtline

 Of those who did, Citizens Advice was again the most likely alternative

Yes No

Had you spoken to anyone else for advice on managing money or debt since your calls to

National Debtline?

26 74

%

Base: all: 300

 Who else have you contacted?

Citizens Advice Bureau

CCCS

Payplan

Debt consultancy service

Other free debt advice service

Fee-charging debt service

Local council

Bank

Finance company

Family / Friends

Solicitor

3

3

3

4

4

5

6

8

13

%

24

31

Base: all respondents who had contacted someone else: 82

66

Email option not ‘top of mind’

 Were you aware that you could contact NDL for advice by email?

Yes No Not sure / don't know

48 48 4

%

 Did or would you consider emailing NDL for advice rather than contacting them by phone?

10

Yes - did consider

33

Yes - would consider No - did / would not consider

57

%

 Why wouldn’t you consider emailing National Debtline?

Prefer to speak to somebody:

58%

Telephone more personal: 35%

Find it difficult to express self/ problems in writing: 8%

Quicker/ more immediate response by phone: 8%

67

Base: all who visited NDL website and not contacted NDL by email (weighted): 113

Only a small proportion had visited website and emailed NDL

 When did National Debtline reply to your email?

Of 8 who visited NDL website and emailed NDL

 5 stated within 24 hrs

 2 stated within 2 or 3 days

 1 can’t remember

How did they reply:

3 stated via email

3 stated via telephone

Base: all who visited website and contacted NDL by email (8)

!!Small base!!

 How would you rate the email service in terms of…

[ All received reply by email ]

The quality of information/ advice offered

The way they responded to your email

The speed of response to your email

Very satisfied

1

5

6

Fairly satisfied

1

Neither/ nor

1

Fairly dissatisfied

-

Very dissatisfied

-

2

1

-

-

-

-

(Number of respondents)

-

-

68

Additional comments

I think it’s great that there is someone who is non judgmental and supportive to talk to in a crisis

It is an important service and I hope it continues the good work

It is a fantastic service and it has changed my life

I think it is invaluable especially for people who are on low income who cannot afford to pay for advice

I did not know about them until I saw them on the internet. They need to make themselves more visible

I wish I had have known about this service before

Being from Scotland, I am sometimes unsure if advice is totally correct as the

English and Scottish systems are different

69

Type of debt: credit card and loans most prevalent

 Which types of debt did you have when you first contacted National Debtline?

63

%

36

10

9 9

7

6 6

5

Credit card Personal loan Mortgage arrears/ secured loans

Overdraft Catalogue debts/ bills

Utility bills

Base: England and Wales: 250, Scotland: 50

70

Other unsecured loans

Store card Council tax

Amount of debt: average was £23,024

%

 What was approximately the total amount of debt you held at the point when you contacted National Debtline?

12 12

17

Mean debt*

Total

Eng & Wales

£23,024

£23,444

Scotland

On DMP

Not on DMP

£20,907

£32,051

£20,257

* Ex undisclosed/ unsure

9

8 8

7

6

5 5

4

2 2 2

Under

£2,499

£2,500-

£4,999

£5,000-

£9,999

£10,000-

£19,999

£20,00-

£25,000

£25,000-

£30,000

£30,000-

£40,000

£40,000-

£50,000

£50,000-

£60,000

£60,000-

£80,000

£80,000-

£100,000

£100,000+ Not disclose Not sure

Base: England and Wales: 250, Scotland: 50

71

Demographics – performance evaluation

Gender

Male Female

59 41 %

Age

2 21

18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75+

36 24 15 2

Ethnicity

White (British, Irish or other)

Mixed (e.g. White & Black Caribbean orWhite & Asian)

Asian or Asian British

Black or Black British

94

Base: all (300)

72

1 2 2

%

%

Demographics – performance evaluation

Employment Status

Working full time Working part time Unemployed Responsible for household Retired Other

47 19 11 9 6 7

Predominantly unable to work due to ill health/ disability

%

Marital Status

Married / cohabiting Divorced / separated Single Widowed

55 15 26 3 %

Dependant children living at home

One Two Three

21 22

More than three No children at home

45 8 4

Base: all (weighted):

73

300

%

%

12

Gross household income: average was £22,495

11

8

Mean income*

Total

Eng & Wales

£22,495

£22,539

Scotland

On DMP

Not on DMP

£22,227

£23,176

£22,263

* Ex undisclosed/ unsure

5 5 5

4 4 4

3 3

<£9,499 £9,500-

£11,449

£11,500-

£13,449

£13,500-

£15,499

£15,500-

£17,499

£17,500-

£24,999

£25,000-

£29,999

£30,000-

£34,999

£35,000-

£39,999

£40,000-

£49,999

>£50,000

Base: all (300) Nb 36% did not disclose

74

Website Evaluation:

Appendix Information

Reasons for using the website

 Often, users come to the website seeking specific information:

I need help with a sample letter I’d like to find some information on

IVAs

To re-enforce information contained in

National Debtline's booklet

I have currently got several thousand pounds worth of debt and don't know where to start clearing it....

To add a shortcut to my desktop

 A number of other users were browsing the site on behalf of other people or for general research purposes:

I work in a CAB and know that your fact sheets are excellent. I wanted to give one to a client

Work related research - trying to find info on bankruptcy

Research for a college project

My daughter is being chased by debt collectors for a debt she does not owe

Primarily for help for a friend, who has already consulted CCCS

I work for a social landlord and need to see what help can be offered to tenants in debt

76

Feedback on the website

 Those who have used the website generally find what they are looking for and are impressed with the information available. Others would prefer to speak to someone as they feel this is a quicker and easier process

There's nothing they could do to improve it, it’s a fantastic service

Clear understandable layout, detailed site map, not using long words - putting the content into layman terms

I don't see the point e-mailing when you're dealing with something as complex as debt because the only thing you could email is 'help somebody get in contact with me'

To a certain extent, you don't know the right questions to ask; it's a learning process, out of expediency it's better to have somebody to talk to

77

I prefer talking to somebody who can sort it out quickly

Awareness of National Debtline: Internet search and Citizens Advice most frequently cited sources

 How did you first hear about National Debtline?

2006 2008

32%

34%

16%

20%

15%

11%

12%

9%

10%

9%

Other sources mentioned:

Previous knowledge

Yellow pages

Credit reference agencies

Moneysavingexpert.com

Through work/ job

Internet search

Citizens

Advice

Another website

TV/ media Friend/ relative

Base: all who completed on-line survey (475 in 2006, 450 in 2008)

3%

2% 2%

4%

Article in paper/ magazine

78

Financial adviser/ bank

1% 1%

Yellow pages

1% 1%

2%

1%

2%

5%

Credit reference agency

People I owe money to

Leaflet Something else

Demographics – website survey

Male Female

65% 2008

Gender

2006

35%

2008 5%

38% 62%

18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74

24% 38% 21% 10% 2%

Age

2006 8% 30% 39% 19% 4%

Base: all who completed on-line survey (475 in 2006, 450 in 2008)

79

Ethnicity

Demographics – website survey

2008

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr

White (British, Irish or other)

Asian or Asian British

Black or Black British

4th Qtr

90%

2006

92%

80

Base: all who completed on-line survey (475 in 2006, 450 in 2008)

Demographics – website survey

Marital status

2008

Married/ cohabiting

56%

Single Divorced/ separated

24%

Widowed

14% 2%

2006

Employment status

Working full time

Retired

2008

48%

56%

Working part time

Self-employed

14%

25% 13% 1%

Responsible for household Unemployed

Other

6% 11% 4% 9% 5%

2006

60% 14% 9% 6% 1% 6%

Base: all who completed on-line survey (475 in 2006, 450 in 2008). Refused not shown

81

Longitudinal Evaluation:

Appendix Information

A quarter had experienced further money and debt difficulties 4 plus years on

 Since last call to NDL, encountered any further difficulties with managing money and debt…

Yes, further difficulties

Contacted anyone else for advice:

5 years on 23%

4 respondents

4 years on 24%

4 respondents

2 years on 13% 6 respondents

Base: All 2 years on (90), All 4 years on (41 ), All 5 years on (31) Base: all 2 yrs (12), 4 yrs (10), 5 yrs (7)

Who else contacted?

Citizens Advice

CCCS

Family/ friends

Other free debt advice

Other

2 years on callers

(number of callers)

1

1

2

1

3

4 years on callers

(number of callers)

0

2

0

0

2

5 years on callers

(number of callers)

0

0

1

0

3

Base: All who contacted somebody else for advice - 2 years on (6), All 4 years on (4), All 5 years on (4)

83

Contacting creditors was most likely action taken following advice from NDL. DMP/ pay plan more prevalent amongst “2 yrs”

What actions have you taken as a result of the advice provided by National Debtline?

30

34

35

Contact creditors

Draw up a budget

Debt management plan/pay plan

Declared myself bankrupt

Consult CCCS

Consult CAB

Consult Payplan

Got financial situation under control

Took out an IVA

Got advice/information

Reduced debt

2

3

3

3

5

7

1

3

3

5

6

7

2

3

5

6

6

7

10

12

14

16

13

7

7

6

6

5

6

2 yrs on

4 yrs on

5 yrs on

84

If in similar debt situation, half state would contact creditors and a quarter would call NDL

(unprompted)

Imagine you had a similar debt problem to the one you originally contacted National

Debtline about.

What specific steps would you take to help yourself out of the situation?

Contact creditors

Call National Debtline

Draw up a budget

Wouldn't get into that situation again

7

10

13

16

10

16

21

23

85

44

52

55

41

%

2 years on

4 years on

5 years on

Base:

All 2 years on (90)

All 4 years on (41)

All 5 years on (31)

Service improvements

Actually getting through to them in the first place is the main downfall

I think it should be advertised even more…I had to go looking for it

Just have more phone lines

If anything, NDL could improve by just shouting a bit louder

(about what it does)

The documents they send could be a bit more concise

Give some example of responses from creditors who have received letters which have been sent out as instructed by National Debt Line

When they send out the information it should be more specific to my needs rather than just a blanket booklet

Face to face contact to be available

More user interactions with the service, an online forum for example

A call back in the future to see how people are getting on

86

Range of bodies set up DMP arrangements

 If on a debt management programme, who was it that set up this arrangement for you?

Set up by CSSS/ payplan after being referred to them by

National Debtline

Another debt management company

23

36

CSSS without National

Debtline acting as intermediary

Payplan without

National Debtline acting as intermediary

Not sure/ Can't remember

8

11

23

Total

Base: All on debt management programme – all years (53)

87

Demographics – Longitudinal evaluation

Age

2 years on callers

4 years on callers

5 years on callers

1 12

15

30

44

36

29

13 8

10 2

10

18-24

35

25-34 35-44 45-54

42

55-64 65+

10 3

%

Base:

All 2 years on (90)

All 4 years on (41)

All 5 years on (31)

General population age breakdown

General population

13 13 15 13 12

15-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55--64 65+

Source: ONS (% under 15 not shown)

88

16

%

Demographics – Longitudinal evaluation

Employment Status

2 years on

4 years on

42

46

16 4

29

11 9

10 5

14 2

7 2 %

5 years on

45 19 6 6 6 16

Marital Status

Working full time Working part time Responsible for household Retired Unemployed Unable to work Self employed

Refused not shown

2 years on

4 years on

5 years on

63 22 12 2

61

71

Married/ cohabiting

15 22 2

%

Single Divorced/ separated

16 6

Widowed

6

Base:

All 2 years on (90)

All 4 years on (41)

All 5 years on (31)

89

Gross household income – Longitudinal evaluation

Mean income*

Total

2 years on

£21,319

£20,699

4 years on

5 years on

%

£22,922

£21,120

* Ex undisclosed/ unsure

12

10 10

12

10

12 12

7

<£9,500 £9,500-£13,499 £13,500-

£17,499

2 years on 4 years on 5 years on

21

Base:

All 2 years on (90)

All 4 years on (41)

All 5 years on (31)

24

23

17

22

23

20

£17,500-

£24,499

13 13

12

10

7

£25,000-

£34,999

4

2

£35,000-

£49,999

3

£50,000+ Undisclosed

90

Total current debt – Longitudinal evaluation

Total

2 years on

4 years on

Mean debt*

£23,109

5 years on

£26,355

£19,580

£17,267

* Ex undisclosed/ unsure

33

2 years on 4 years on 5 years on

43

27

29

19 19

13

11

10

34

Base: all with outstanding debt

2 years on (73)

4 years on (30)

5 years on (21)

Refused not shown

23

19

%

Under £2,500 £2,500-£9,999

91

£10,000-£24,999 £25,000+

Type of debt (unprompted) – Longitudinal evaluation

 Which types of debt do you currently have?

71

67

63

Base: all with outstanding debt

2 years on (73)

4 years on (30)

5 years on (21)

2 years on 4 years on 5 years on

40

42

29

Credit card

10

17

14 14

13

11

5

7

12

Personal loan Other unsecured loans

Mortgage arreas/secured loans

Store card

14

13

Overdraft

5

14

8

5

3 3

Catalogue debts Hire purchase

3

1

Rent arrears

3

1

Utility bills

92

Download