Ecology of C3 and C4 Grasses (Poaceae) in the United States

advertisement
Ecology of C3 and C4 Grasses (Poaceae) in the United States: a Phylogenetically Controlled Analysis
Patrick J. Alexander, Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, paalexan@nmsu.edu
However, although it is common knowledge that C3 and C4 grasses segregate
Introduction:
along climatic gradients, with C4 grasses in hotter, drier habitats, this is based
Grasses (Poaceae) are the fifth-largest plant family
on phylogenetically-uncorrected analyses. Phylogenetic constraints on
world-wide, and yet far more important than their
photosynthesis evolution reduce the number of independent data points, since
diversity indicates both in structuring ecosystems
closely-related taxa will tend to be similar in all traits rather than only
and in human nutrition, through direct and indirect photosynthetic pathway. Unless comparisons are limited to independent
consumption. As a result, grass ecology is of
derivations of C4 photosynthesis with their sister groups, confounding similarities
fundamental importrance. A major factor affecting among clade members may be responsible for the observed pattern. A
grass distribution across climates is photosynthesis preliminary analysis (results not shown) using six sites in Arizona showed no
type. The family includes members with both C3
significant relationship between photosynthesis type and either maximum mean
and C4 photosynthesis, with C4 photosynthesis
annual temperature or total annual precipitation, so a nationwide analysis
arising independently multiple times.
including a wider variety of habitats and representing more independent
derivations of C4 photosynthesis was conducted.
Process:
1 Choose sites across the US to represent a
wide array of climates within the constraints of
availability of climatological and distributional
data:
4 Calculate a diversity-weighted annual
mean value of each climatological
variable for each genus ( =( across sites
(# species at each site * climate value for
site)) / total # of occurrences of the
genus ) and a phenologically corrected
mean (since climatic separation can
occur at a single site through different
phenology; p.c. mean is calculated as for
annual mean except that only climate
data from estimated growth period (each
of the 2 months of greatest collection
minus one) are included)
2 Compile a list of grass species
present at each site from online
herbarium databases (1, 2, 3, 4,
5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10); check names
against the online Manual of
Grasses of North America (11)
and USDA PLANTS Database
(12) for nomenclatural
consistency; score number of
species in each genus at each
site; find the 2 months of
greatest collection for each site.
3 Compile climatological data-annual mean maximum temperatue,
annual mean temperature, and total
precipitation
--for all sites from Regional Climate
Center data (13, 14, 15).
In addition to the CAIC analysis results shown at left, highly significant (p<.0001)
relationships were found in all phylogenetically-uncorrected Student’s T-Test analyses.
Results from CAIC analysis are shown below:
These results suggest that C4 photosynthesis does indeed significantly affect the
Annual Mean Values
p-value r2
distribution of grasses along heat and moisture gradients. Failure to find a relationship
Annual maximum mean temperature
0.0530 0.4906
in the preliminary Arizona analysis may be due to either insufficient climatic variation
Annual mean temperature
0.0208 0.6174
among sample areas or to poor representation of the multiple origins of C4 photosynthesis
Precipitation
0.0490 0.5025
in Panicoideae.
2
Phenologically-Corrected Values
p-value r
The effect of phenological correction is puzzling. In the Arizona analysis,
Annual maximum mean temperature
0.0136 0.6650
phenological correction increased the strength of all tested relationships (data not
Annual mean temperature
0.1079 0.3728
Precipitation
0.4463 0.0996
shown), but in the nationwide analysis it rendered associations with both annual
mean temperature and precipitation nonsignifcant. Although phenological separation of C3 and C4
plants is common in warm climates, the tendency for all plants to grow together during brief warm
growing seasons in colder climates may tend to erode differences between these predominantly C3
areas and the warmer sites of the southern US. This may explain the pattern with precipitation and
annual mean temperature, although the contrary increase in significance of association of
photosynthesis type with annual maximum mean temperature remains anomalous.
Results & Discussion:
Citations:
1.
2.
3.
6 Test for a relationship between C3/C4
photosynthesis and each of the three climatic
variables using Comparative Analysis via
Independent Contrasts (CAIC, 22) and by a
Student’s T-Test in Microsoft Excel (23).
Pooideae
Bambusoideae
Oryzoideae
Aristidoideae
Arundinoideae
Danthonioideae
Chloridoideae
Centothecoideae
Andropogoneae
Steinchisma
Axonopus, Paspalum, Panicum § Obtusa
Phanopyrum
Panicum §s Agrostoidea and Tenera
Digitaria
5 Compile a phylogeny of the included genera from published
Dichanthelium
phylogenies (16, 17, 18, 19); at right is a simplified phylogeny,
Panicum § Verrucosa
generated in NONA (20) with Winclada (21), showing major lineages
Echinochloa
Oplismenus
and all independent derivations of C4 photosynthesis. Branches
Panicum §s Dichotomiflora, Panicum, Bulbosa,
leading to C4 taxa are in red. Genera not included in published
and Virgata; Urochloa, Setaria, Stenotaphrum,
phylogenies were entered as basal polytomies in the least-inclusive
Cenchrus, and Pennisetum
higher taxon (usually the tribe) available.
{
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Panicoideae
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
SEINet. Collections Search. (Arizona State University, Tempe AZ, 2006. http://seinet.asu.edu/collections/selection.jsp, 2-5 June 2006).
Consortium of California Herbaria. Search Pages. (University of California, Berkeley CA, 2006. http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/consortium/, 2-5 June 2006).
CU Museum. Vascular Plants of Colorado Database Search. (University of Colorado, Boulder CO, 2006.
http://cumuseum.colorado.edu/Research/Botany/Databases/search.php, 2-5 June 2006).
Colorado State University Herbarium. Herbarium Search Page. (Colorado State University, Fort Collins CO, 2006. http://wsprod.colostate.edu/cwis440/herbarium/index.asp,
2-5 June 2006).
University of Michigan Herbarium. University of Michigan Species Database. (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI, 2006. http://hti.umich.edu/cgi/b/broker/test/datamgr,
2-5 June 2006).
J. F. Bell Museum of Natural History Herbarium. Vascular Plant Collection Database. (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, 2006.
http://bellspecify.jawshotel.umn.edu/Specify4Script/WebSpPrj.exe/database, 2-5 June 2006).
Pullen Herbarium. Specimen Database Search. (University of Mississippi, Oxford MS, 2006. http://www.herbarium.olemiss.edu/bigsearch.html, 2-5 June 2006).
INRAM. Biodiversity Query Page. (Institute of Natural Resource Analysis and Management, 2002-2006. http://abies.nmsu.edu/INRAM/biodiversity/index2.php, 2-5 June
2006).
Oregon State University Herbarium. Oregon Vascular Plant Database. (Oregon State University, Corvallis OR, 2006. http://ocid.nacse.org/cgibin/qml/herbarium/plants/vherb.qml, 2-5 June 2006).
A.C. Moore Herbarium. South Carolina Plant Atlas. (University of South Carolina, Columbia SC, 2006. http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/herb/, 2-5 June 2006).
Barkworth, M. E., editor. Grass Manual on the Web. (Utah State University, Logan UT, 2006. http://herbarium.usu.edu/webmanual/, 2-5 June 2006).
USDA, NRCS. The PLANTS Database (National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge LA, 2006. http://plants.usda.gov, 2-5 June 2006).
Western Regional Climate Center. Western U.S. Climate Historical Summaries. (Desert Research Institute, Reno NV, 2006. http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/climsum.html, 2-10 June
2006).
Southeast Regional Climate Center. Historical Climate Data for the Southeast. (South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Columbia SC, 2006.
http://www.sercc.com/climateinfo/historical/historical.html, 2-10 June 2006).
Midwestern Regional Climate Center. Historical Climate Summaries. (Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign IL, 2000-2006.
http://mcc.sws.uiuc.edu/climate_midwest/mwclimate_data_summaries.htm, 2-10 June 2006).
Aliscioni, S. S., Giussani, L. M., Zuloaga, F. O. & Kellogg, E. A. A molecular phylogeny of Panicum (Poaceae: Paniceae): tests of monophyly and phylogenetic placement within
the Panicoideae. American Journal of Botany 90, 796-821 (2003).
Catalan, P., Kellogg, E. A. & Olmstead, R. G. Phylogeny of Poaceae Subfamily Pooideae Based on Chloroplast ndhF Gene Sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 8,
150-166 (1997).
Hilu, K. W., Alice, L. A. & Liang, H. Phylogeny of Poaceae Inferred from matK Sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86, 835-651 (1999).
Hilu, K. W. & Alice, L. A. A Phylogeny of Chloridoideae (Poaceae) Based on matK Sequences. Systematic Botany 26, 386-405 (2001).
Goloboff, P. A. NONA (NO NAME) ver. 2 (Published by the author, Tucuman, Argentina, 2000)
Nixon, K. C. WinClada ver. 1.0000 (Published by the author, Ithaca, NY, US, 1999-2002)
Purvis, A. & Rambaut, A. Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data. CABIOS 11, 247-251 (1995).
Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft Excel 2004 for Mac, version 11.0. (Microsoft Corporation, Richmond VA, 2004).
Download