Developments in the Kosovo education sector- to follow up issues Prishtina, 26 March 2008 Lida Kita Issues from ETF 2006 Peer Learning FINANCING Impact: Kosovo Education Finance framework prepared, but to be followed-up by MEST- how to link the reccomandations with the recent development Decentralisation and school autonomy discussion, taken forward by World Bank- after status proposal concerning education sector 2 Strengthening the organisation and financing of the education system in Kosovo Developing the legal framework for primary and secondary education Revision of Law on primary and secondary education to accomodate the Status Proposal implementation Reforming the education financing mechanisms The exisitng education grants to municipalities are expected to become part of non-earmarked block grant to municipalities 3 Flow of General Education Budget MEST MEF Municipal Education Grants Own Revenues (General Grants) Capital Investment Municipal Education Budget Recurrent Budget (and a small amount for capital outlays) There are no sub-accounts for schools, or direct cash transfers to schools. The Municipal Finance Department procures Goods & Services and distributes them to schools.) Wages & Salaries Schools Teachers 4 Education Grants for each municipality = WS + GS + CO WS = a) b) GS = CO= Total wages and salaries for (a) teachers and (b) administrators and support staff: Teachers: based on the pupil-teacher ratios of 21.3 for the majority and 14.2 for the minority pupils Administrators and support staff: according to the existing staff as reported by each municipality Goods and services: a fixed amount per school (€500 for pre- primary and primary and €1,000 for secondary) and a per student amount (€18 per the majority and €22.5 per the minority student) Capital outlays: €5 per student. 5 Strengthening the organisation and financing of the education system in Kosovo Regarding horizontal sharing, the current distribution formula is assessed as being to a large extent transparent, simple, and equitable. Some fine-tuning of the education sector indicators would nevertheless be desirable For the education grant, the total amount has been less than the formula-based amount because of the overall ceiling on education expenditures, and this imposes risks of creating unfunded mandates in education On the other hand, giving greater managerial autonomy to municipalities and service providers which have proper internal control and reporting mechanisms could improve effectiveness and efficiency 6 Improving the Education Financing Mechanism – Next Steps The MFE/MEST working group on education financing are working on the next steps to be taken by these working groups in cooperation with municipal education directors and other stakeholders. Pilot Project on Formula-based Financing from the Municipalities to Schools and Enhancing School Financial Autonomy The World Bank-funded Education Innovation Project (EIP) will support the MEST in piloting a project on formula-based financing from the municipalities to schools and on enhancing school financial autonomy Three municipalities, i.e., Drenas, Podujevo and Mitrovica, were identified as candidates for the pilot project. The pilot will be gradually expanded to other municipalities in later years. 7 Urgent need to improve both effectiveness and accountability between municipalities and schools Municipalities allocate grant resources (from the education grant) to schools without using objective and transparent criteria Schools do not know in advance the level of resources that they can expect to receive. This has undermined service providers’ ability to plan and manage service delivery in a more efficient manner It is advisable that the Pre-University Education Strategy ’07‘17 operational plan proposes decentralizing the management of the education grant. It is positive that the Municipal Budget Department of the MFE plans to gradually delegate budgetary decisions to the level of service providers. An appropriate legal and regulatory framework, as well as a monitoring and evaluation system, needs to be in place, while schools have an urgent need to build capacity in budgetary planning, financial management, and public procurement. 8 Strengthening the organisation and financing of the education system in Kosovo (continue) Reviewing the current formula for education grants/improvement:what factors should be reflected in the new formula Piloting the formula-based financing from the municipality to schools and enhancement of school financial autonomy School Development Grants-multiple-year school development plans 9 Objectives ETF Peer learning 2007 To engage policy makers and school directors in Kosovo in analysing the impact of education and training policies on school level and school management To contribute to improved policy and EU/IPA and other donors’ projects design and implementation by drawing lessons from the peer learning in 2007 To promote capacity building and discussions among stakeholders on how to involve all levels of the system in the VET reforms process 10 Key policy messages: ETF supporting MEST to organise a review on VET reform progress as an input to the development of a sectoral strategy for VET within the framework of the Pre-University Strategy 2007-2013 for Kosovo IPA 2008 Education and Employment components 1. Sector-wide approach in education 2. Vocational Training (VET) capacity building & Employment promotion 11 Key policy messages: To disseminate the findings and recommendations of the pre- feasibility study on SWAp in educations/VET included To strengthen educational leadership and management of education system and schools by defining carefully the roles and responsibilities of each level, by promoting schoolenterprise relationships and by making School Boards more effective, To enhance the quality of education by motivating teachers and by better linking VET to LM needs. To organise in second half of 2008 the national workshop together with the Ministry of Education and members of VET Council to disseminate the review of the progress in VET 12