Click here to access Jan's presentation.

advertisement
COMMUNITY PROFILE:
TULSA 2014
November 2014
Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the
Metropolitan Human Services Commission
2
DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS
Tulsa County, by Census Tract
54.02
54.01
126th
58.07
56
96th
58.08
58.05 58.06
58.01
91.01
9400.05
91.04
79
57
80.02
80.01
62
66th
36th
59
111
2
Apache
1
8 7
9400.06
93
92
46
65.06
49
14
15
16
60
82
19 18
17
72
83
37
38
39
53
40
70
85.02
90.04 90.06
90.07
52
86
69.05 69.06
90.08
90.09
20
21
35
36
Pine
Admiral
89
73.09
73.11
42
44 43.02 41.01
51
71.01 71.02 73.04 73.10
84
73.08
85.01 73.05 73.06 73.12
41st
48
50.01 50.02
67.01
68.01 68.03 87 69.01 69.02 69.03 69.07
68.04
76.08 76.09 76.11 76.13 76.15 76.16 76.17 74.10
49th W
81st W
65th W
67.05
90.03
74.09
76.34
67.03
61st
74.07
75.18 75.19 75.10 75.03
75.24
76.33 76.29 76.30
67.07
75.08
75.07
75.06
75.12
75.11
75.13
75.22
75.15
75.23
67.08
77.01
81st
111th
76.37 76.36 76.35 75.20
76.38
Tulsa Public Schools
City of Tulsa
Change in population
Gain
Loss
74.14
76.4276.41 76.12 76.14 76.20 76.19 76.18 74.11 74.12 74.13 74.15 74.02 74.08
76.25 76.31 76.32 76.39
131st
76.24
75.16
78.01
161st E
77.02
129th E
145th E
Mingo
Garnett
Memorial
Sheridan
Yale
Lewis
Harvard
Peoria
Union
Elwood
78.02
33rd W
Overall, the county’s
population grew 7.1% from
563,299 to 603,403, while
the city’s population
actually declined .3% from
393,049 to 391,906
between 2000 and 2010.
34
33
3
65.07
97th W
58% of Tulsa County's 175
census tracts lost
population (102) between
2000 and 2010, while 65%
of the City of Tulsa's 124
tracts declined in
population (81).
94.02
31 32
45 43.01
66
47
23.01
4
193rd E
95
13
12
25
88
94.01
6
9 10
27
30
5
177th E
Widespread loss…
29
113th W
3
Census Tracts
Of Total
Population
Gain And Loss:
2000 to 2010
55
Source:US US
Census
Bureau
2000
2010 Censuses.
Source:
Census
Bureau,
2000 and
2010and
Censuses.
Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (5.20.2014)
181st
projections
Population Trends and Projections by Age Group:
Oklahoma, 1970-2030
2030
6.4%
16.8%
9.0%
2020
6.6%
17.2%
9.3%
2010
7.0%
17.7%
10.2%
2000
6.8%
19.0%
1990
7.2%
1980
7.7%
1970
7.7%
0%
19.4%
49.0%
50.0%
10.2%
13.3%
25.1%
0-4
5-17
18-24
11.6% 1.7%
49.7%
12.0% 1.5%
11.3% 1.1%
43.8%
10.8% 0.9%
60%
25-64
2.1%
11.9% 1.7%
46.0%
40%
2.5%
50.6%
11.6%
20%
14.9%
51.5%
10.3%
20.5%
16.3%
65-84
80%
100%
85+
Source: US Census Bureau, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, and 2010 Censuses; Oklahoma Department of Commerce, 2012 Demographic State of the State Report:
Oklahoma State and County Population Projections through 2075.
Living Arrangements of Related Children Under 18
Tulsa County, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000 & 2005-07 Estimates
100%
1970
1980
1990
2000
2005-07 est.
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
1970
1980
1990
2000
2005-07 est.
Married Couple
Male-headed
Female-headed
Other relatives
82%
74%
71%
65%
61%
1%
2%
3%
5%
6%
11%
16%
18%
21%
25%
4%
6%
5%
7%
8%
Children living with 1 or both parents
Source: US Census Bureau, 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000 Censuses; US Census Bureau, American Community Survey
2005-07.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Wage Comparison: Self-Sufficiency, Welfare, Minimum, Poverty
and 185% of Poverty, and Median Family Income: Family of
Three, Tulsa County 2014
7
$80,000
$70,000
$60,000
Annual wage
Self-sufficiency
wage: $44,627
$76,755
($36.34/hr.)
($21.13/hour)
$50,000
$54,001
$36,612
$30,000
($17.33/hr.)
$20,000
$-
All families
($25.57/hr.)
$40,000
$10,000
Married couple
families
$10,800
$15,312
($5.11/hr.)
($7.25/hr.)
Welfare wage
Minimum wage
($17.75/hr.)
Male-headed
families
$21,296
$19,790
Female-headed
families
($10.08/hr.)
($9.37/hr.)
Poverty wage
$37,479
185% poverty
wage
Median family
income
Notes: For self-sufficiency wage, family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one school-age child. Hourly wages given assume full-time, year-round
employment. Welfare wage is the combined value of TANF, SNAP, & WIC. Median family income represents families with children under age 18. Values shown for
median family income are midpoint estimates within a 90% confidence range, which can be very wide.
Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard for
Oklahoma 2009; Federal Register Notice, 01/22/2014, Annual Update of the HHS Poverty Guidelines; Bureau of Labor Statistics, July 2014; Oklahoma State Dept.
of Human Services; US Census Bureau, 2008-12 American Community Survey. (American Community Survey data are estimates based on a sample of the population.
These estimates are midpoint values within a 90% confidence range, which can be very large, especially for smaller geographies.)
Ratio of Income to Poverty by Age: Tulsa and North Tulsa, 2008-12
8
100.0%
100%
200%
87.7%
80.0%
60.0%
64.5%
49.5%
42.8%
34.5%
40.0%
20.0%
67.0%
34.5%
19.7%
0.0%
Total population
Under 6
Tulsa
Source: US Census Bureau, 2008-12 American Community Survey.
Total population
North Tulsa
Under 6
Unemployment Rates: Tulsa, 1990-2013
9
8.0
7.3
5.3
6.0
4.6
4.0
3.1
2.0
0.0
1990
1995
2000
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics.
2005
2010
2013
Adverse Childhood Experiences…
10
…DISEASE, DISABILITY AND
SOCIAL PROBLEMS IN
ADULTHOOD
…GROWING UP IN A
HOUSEHOLD WITH ADVERSE
CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES:
…ADOPTION OF HEALTH
RISK BEHAVIORS…

Recurrent physical abuse

Recurrent emotional abuse

Sexual abuse

Smoking

An alcohol or drug abuser

Overeating

An incarcerated household member

Physical inactivity

Someone who is chronically depressed, suicidal, 
institutionalized or mentally ill

Mother being treated violently

Living with one or neither parent

Emotional or physical neglect
Heavy alcohol use

Nicotine addiction

Alcoholism

Drug addiction

Obesity

Depression

Suicide

Injuries

Unintentional pregnancy

Drug use

Adolescent pregnancy

Promiscuity

Heart disease

Cancer

Chronic lung and liver disease

Stroke

Diabetes

Fetal death

Sexually transmitted diseases
Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “What are Adverse Childhood Experieinces (ACE’s).”
Summary of Risk Factors for Infants, Tulsa County, 2013
12
Teen mother (15-19)
7.8%
729
873
9.8%
Poor prenatal care (3rd tri. or no care)
20.8%
Mother w/ <12th grade education
Low birthweight (1500-2499 grams)
0.0%
Total births = 9,243
117
25.8%
Short birth spacing (<24 mos. apart)
Premature (<37 weeks gest.)
1,911
674
7.3%
Very low birthweight (<1500 grams) 1.3%
Very short birth spacing (<18 mos. apart)
3,888
42.1%
Unmarried
13.1%
11.7%
10.0%
NA
NA
1,081
20.0%
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Vital Statistics 2013, OK2SHARE, accessed on 11/20/14.
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
13
14
Percentage of 4th Graders NOT Proficient in Reading by Race and
Hispanic Origin: United States: 2011
15
Source: Annie E. Casey Foundation, “KIDS COUNT Data Book, 2013.”
Average Freshman Graduation Rates by Race: Tulsa Public
Schools, 2012-13 School Year
54.1%
All students
50.3%
Black
43.2%
American Indian
86.4%
Asian
51.4%
Hispanic
62.3%
White
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Note: "Average freshman graduation rate" refers to the number of graduating seniors as a proportion of the average number of students
enrolled in 8th, 9th, and 10th grades for that graduating cohort.
Source: Office of Educational Quality and Accountability, based on data provided by the Oklahoma State Department of Education.
16
Educational Attainment for Persons Age 25 & over:
Tulsa and North Tulsa, 2008-12
17
25.4%
Less than high school
13.4%
37.4%
High school graduate
26.1%
23.5%
Some college
23.5%
5.2%
Associate degree
North Tulsa
Tulsa
7.3%
6.4%
Bachelor's degree
19.6%
2.1%
Advanced degree
0.0%
10.2%
5.0%
10.0%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2008-12 American Community Survey.
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
Participation in Public Assistance Programs
Number of Participants and Percentage of Population Participating
During a Single Month, Tulsa County, 2012
Soonercare Total (185%/100%)
19.3%
116,415
Soonercare <19 (185%)
47%
76,569
14.8%
89,325
1.8%
2,720
TANF <18 (50%)
55.1%
34,358
Elem. School Free Lunch (130%)
10.1%
6,314
Elem. School Reduced Lunch (185%)
100,000
50,000
Number of Participants
18
8.2%
3,667
Child Care Subsidy <5 (185%)
150,000
20.2%
9,063
WIC age 1-5 (185%)
SNAP Total (130%)
43.5%
3,829
WIC Infants (185%)
0%
0
20%
40%
60%
80%
Percent of Population
Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Statistical Bulletin, Jan. 2012; Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2011-12; US Census Bureau,
2010 Census; Oklahoma State Department of Health-WIC Service, Caseload Report, Jan. 2012; Oklahoma Health Care Authority, Fast Facts, Jan.2012.
Overall Health Status Ranking: Oklahoma, 1990-2013
19
49
48
50
41
40
36
38
42
39
41
43
44
41
41
46
43
42
44
47
49
46 46 46
32 32
30
20
10
0
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings 2013.”
44
Oklahoma’s Rankings in Health Determinants, 2013
20
1=Healthiest state
50=Least healthy state
43
All Determinants
39
Behaviors
Smoking
46
45
44
Drug deaths
Obesity
Physical inactivity
27
Policy &
Clinical Care
Community &
Environment
HS graduation
41
Violent crime
45
Occup. fatalities
Infectious disease
18
46
Children in poverty
32
Lack of health insurance
Public health funding
Immunization - children
Primary care physicians
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings 2013.”
26
48
48
Oklahoma’s Rankings in Health Outcomes, 2013
21
1=Healthiest state
50=Least healthy state
45
All Outcomes
43
Diabetes
41
Poor mental health days
42
Poor physical health days
Disparity in health status (education)
Infant mortality rate
27
44
48
Cardiovascular deaths
Cancer deaths
Premature death
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings 2013.”
43
47
Low Health Status: Oklahoma and United States, 1996-2013
22
25%
Percent of adults reporting fair or poor health
20.5%20.2%
20.2%
19.7%
19.6%
19.2%
19.0%
18.7%
18.7%
17.7%17.8%
19.6%
20%
17.4%
15.3%
15%
10%
17.9%
16.9%
14.0%
13.4%
13.1%
12.6%
14.7%14.7%14.9%14.8%14.7%14.9%14.4%14.5%14.7%
13.9%14.0%
12.9%12.9%12.8%12.6%13.0%
Oklahoma
45
42
U.S.
32
26
5%
41 41
44 42 46 43 42 42 45
41
34
28
38
25
Oklahoma’s rank
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
0%
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
Note: Data for 2011 and 2012 are not directly comparable to previous years because of changes in weighting and sampling.
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings 2013.”
Obesity Prevalence: Oklahoma and United States, 1990-2013
23
35%
Percent of adults estimated to be obese
Oklahoma
32.0%
31.3% 32.2%
31.0%
31.1%
U.S.
28.8% 28.8%
26.8%
24.9%
24.4%
27.8%
26.9%
25%
22.9%
26.3%
27.6%
22.6%
27.5%
25.1%
21.1%
26.7%
24.4%
19.5% 19.7%
22.9%
21.9%
20%
23.2%
20.9%
16.8%
15.1%
19.6%
13.5%
20.0%
13.2%
14.1%12.1%
18.3%
15%
11.9%
16.8%
11.6%11.6%
16.5%
45 45
44 43 46 46
15.9%
12.6% 14.4%
40
38
37
37 37 38
10% 11.6%11.6%12.6% 13.7%
35 37
30%
23 23 22
5%
29
27
22
14 14 12
14
Oklahoma’s rank
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
0%
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Note: Data for 2011 and 2012 are not directly comparable to previous years because of changes in weighting and sampling.
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings 2013.”
Smoking Prevalence: Oklahoma and United States, 1990-2013
24
Percent of adults who are current smokers
35% 33.0%
30%
29.5%
25%
20%
15%
28.7%
28.7%
26.6%
28.7%
26.6% 26.1%
26.1%
25.1% 25.8% 25.5% 26.1%
24.6% 25.2%
24.7% 23.7%
25.1%
25.0%
25.1%
24.1% 23.9%
23.3%
23.3%
21.7%
25.2%25.2%
23.5%
23.2%
22.7%
23.2% 22.8%23.2%
23.2%22.0%
22.7%
23.0%
22.9%
22.2%
21.2%
20.9%20.6% 19.8%
19.6%
20.1%
18.4%17.9% 17.3%
Oklahoma
U.S.
44 42 42
40
10%
49
45
41
37
36
28
5%
15
47 46 47 48 46 48 48 47
42
36
32
39
27
Oklahoma’s rank
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
0%
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Note: Data for 2011 and 2012 are not directly comparable to previous years because of changes in sampling methodology.
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings 2013.”
25
26
Conclusion
Contact Information:
Melanie Poulter
Senior Planner, Demography and Geography
Community Service Council
www.csctulsa.org
918-295-1285
mpoulter@csctulsa.org
27
Download