COMMUNITY PROFILE:
NORTH TULSA
2014
November 2014
Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the
Metropolitan Human Services Commission
Overview
3
Population shifting demographically
 Well-being of children not so well
 Many strive for “living wage”… and
many must rely on public assistance to fill
the gap
 Continuing impact of social determinants
of health

4
DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS
Total population, 2010:
Tulsa County: 603,403
City of Tulsa: 391,906
55
96th
58.08
58.05 58.06
58.01
91.01
91.04
66th
Tulsa County has a 2010
population of 603,403
79
57
80.02
80.01
36th
59
111
2
62
Apache
1
9400.06
29
93
92
8 7
6 5
9 10
12
27
30
46
45 43.01
66
65.06
49
47
3
15
16
60
82
19 18
17
72
83
20
21
35
36
Pine
Admiral
89
73.09
73.11
42
44 43.02 41.01
51
37
38
39
53
71.01 71.02 73.04 73.10
40
70
85.02
90.04 90.06
52
86
69.05 69.06
90.08
73.08
85.01 73.05 73.06 73.12
84
48
50.0150.02
67.01
68.01 68.03 87 69.01 69.02 69.03 69.07
68.04
76.0876.09 76.11 76.13 76.15 76.16 76.17 74.10
31st
90.07
90.09
49th W
67.05
76.25 76.31 76.32 76.39
76.34
67.07
74.14
74.07
75.18 75.19 75.10 75.03
75.24
76.33 76.29 76.30
75.08
75.07
75.06
75.12
75.11
91st
76.37 76.36 76.35 75.20
76.38
75.13
75.22
75.15
121st
75.23
67.08
77.01
76.24
75.16
151st
78.01
Mingo
Garnett
Memorial
Sheridan
Yale
Peoria
Union
Elwood
33rd W
78.02
193rd E
161st E
77.02
Source: US Census Bureau 2000 and 2010 Censuses.
Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Census.
61st
74.09
76.42 76.41 76.12 76.14 76.20 76.19 76.18 74.11 74.12 74.13 74.15 74.02 74.08
67.03
City of Tulsa
Total population
Less than 2,000
2,000 to 2,999
3,000 to 3,999
4,000 to 4,999
5,000 or more
90.03
177th E
81st W
65th W
65.07
97th W
113th W
94.02
34
33
31 32
4
14
129th E
95
94.01
23.01
25
88
13
181st
145th E
391,906 persons reside in the
City of Tulsa
The areas low in population
are found in small areas across
the City, especially North Tulsa
and a pocket in Southeast Sand
Springs/Berryhill
58.07
56
9400.05
The areas of highest population
concentrations are found in
suburban areas, especially
Owasso, Collinsville, Jenks,
Glenpool, Sand Springs, East
Tulsa and a handful of small
areas in South Tulsa and
Broken Arrow
54.02
54.01
126th
Lewis
Harvard
Total
Population
2010
Prepared by the Community Service Council,
with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (12/12/2011)
Tulsa County, by Census Tract
54.02
54.01
126th
58.07
56
96th
58.08
58.05 58.06
58.01
91.01
9400.05
91.04
79
57
80.02
80.01
62
66th
36th
59
111
2
Apache
1
8 7
9400.06
93
92
46
65.06
49
14
15
16
60
82
19 18
17
72
83
37
38
39
53
40
70
85.02
90.04 90.06
90.07
52
86
69.05 69.06
90.08
90.09
20
21
35
36
Pine
Admiral
89
73.09
73.11
42
44 43.02 41.01
51
71.01 71.02 73.04 73.10
84
73.08
85.01 73.05 73.06 73.12
41st
48
50.01 50.02
67.01
68.01 68.03 87 69.01 69.02 69.03 69.07
68.04
76.08 76.09 76.11 76.13 76.15 76.16 76.17 74.10
49th W
81st W
65th W
67.05
90.03
74.09
76.34
67.03
61st
74.07
75.18 75.19 75.10 75.03
75.24
76.33 76.29 76.30
67.07
75.08
75.07
75.06
75.12
75.11
75.13
75.22
75.15
75.23
67.08
77.01
81st
111th
76.37 76.36 76.35 75.20
76.38
Tulsa Public Schools
City of Tulsa
Change in population
Gain
Loss
74.14
76.4276.41 76.12 76.14 76.20 76.19 76.18 74.11 74.12 74.13 74.15 74.02 74.08
76.25 76.31 76.32 76.39
131st
76.24
75.16
78.01
161st E
77.02
129th E
145th E
Mingo
Garnett
Memorial
Sheridan
Yale
Lewis
Harvard
Peoria
Union
Elwood
78.02
33rd W
Overall, the county’s
population grew 7.1% from
563,299 to 603,403, while
the city’s population
actually declined .3% from
393,049 to 391,906
between 2000 and 2010.
34
33
3
65.07
97th W
58% of Tulsa County's 175
census tracts lost
population (102) between
2000 and 2010, while 65%
of the City of Tulsa's 124
tracts declined in
population (81).
94.02
31 32
45 43.01
66
47
23.01
4
193rd E
95
13
12
25
88
94.01
6
9 10
27
30
5
177th E
Widespread loss…
29
113th W
6
Census Tracts
Of Total
Population
Gain And Loss:
2000 to 2010
55
Source:US US
Census
Bureau
2000
2010 Censuses.
Source:
Census
Bureau,
2000 and
2010and
Censuses.
Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (5.20.2014)
181st
projections
Population Trends and Projections by Age Group:
Oklahoma, 1970-2030
2030
6.4%
16.8%
9.0%
2020
6.6%
17.2%
9.3%
2010
7.0%
17.7%
10.2%
2000
6.8%
19.0%
1990
7.2%
1980
7.7%
1970
7.7%
0%
19.4%
49.0%
50.0%
10.2%
13.3%
25.1%
0-4
5-17
18-24
11.6% 1.7%
49.7%
12.0% 1.5%
11.3% 1.1%
43.8%
10.8% 0.9%
60%
25-64
2.1%
11.9% 1.7%
46.0%
40%
2.5%
50.6%
11.6%
20%
14.9%
51.5%
10.3%
20.5%
16.3%
65-84
80%
100%
85+
Source: US Census Bureau, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, and 2010 Censuses; Oklahoma Department of Commerce, 2012 Demographic State of the State Report:
Oklahoma State and County Population Projections through 2075.
Race Comparison for Total Population and Young
Children, Tulsa and North Tulsa, 2010
8
Tulsa total population = 391,906
North Tulsa total population = 66,824
55,266
14.1%
12,320
18.4%
19,239
4.9%
9,677
2.5%
19,473
5.0%
227,021
57.9%
19,745
29.5%
3,704
5.5%
348
0.5%
3,601
5.4%
61,230
15.6%
27,106
40.6%
White
Black
Source: Census Bureau, 2010 Census.
American Indian & Alaska Native
Asian
2+ races
Hispanic
9
10
11
STATUS OF CHILDREN
Family Type for Children under Age 6 by Race and Ethnicity:
City of Tulsa and North Tulsa, 2010
13
100%
31.7%
80%
39.2%
45.6%
64.0%
10.1%
40.0%
46.5%
15.6%
14.6%
58.2%
20%
25.6%
36.4%
9.1%
0.0%
11.1%
43.3%
7.1%
5.1%
70.0%
14.0%
10.5%
10.2%
9.6%
60%
40%
19.5%
24.1%
17.6%
87.8%
66.3%
70.2%
46.8%
73.3%
63.6%
38.9%
9.2%
44.4%
20.8%
0%
Total
Black
Married couple
Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Census.
Nat.Amer.
Male-headed
NH White
Female-headed
Hispanic
Asian
Note: Blue shaded bars represent North Tulsa.
14
Summary of Risk Factors for Infants, Tulsa County, 2013
16
Teen mother (15-19)
7.8%
729
873
9.8%
Poor prenatal care (3rd tri. or no care)
20.8%
Mother w/ <12th grade education
Low birthweight (1500-2499 grams)
0.0%
Total births = 9,243
117
25.8%
Short birth spacing (<24 mos. apart)
Premature (<37 weeks gest.)
1,911
674
7.3%
Very low birthweight (<1500 grams) 1.3%
Very short birth spacing (<18 mos. apart)
3,888
42.1%
Unmarried
13.1%
11.7%
10.0%
NA
NA
1,081
20.0%
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Vital Statistics 2013, OK2SHARE, accessed on 11/20/14.
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
Births to Teens by Zip Code with Overlay of
School District Boundaries, Tulsa Area, 2009-12
74070
74021
Skiatook
Collinsville
74073
Sperry
74055
Sand Springs
74126
74117
74130
74106 74110
74127
74115
74063
Keystone
7412074104
74119
74114
Berryhill
74108
74129
74105
74132
74135
74145
74146
Union
74136
74133
74137
74066
74015
74128
74112
74134
74107
74131
74116
Tulsa
74103
Sand Springs
Owasso
74014
74012
Broken Arrow
Jenks
Sapulpa
74037
74011
74033
74041Glenpool
Bixby
74008
200 or more births to teens
125 to 199 births to teens
75 to 124 births to teens
Liberty
74047
25 to 74 births to teens
Less than 25 births to teens
School district boundaries
Tulsa County 2013
Tulsa County births to teens = 3,987
Area zip codes total births to teens = 4,326
Note: Area zip codes total births to teens exceeds that of the county due to zip codes extending into neighboring counties.
Source: Tulsa County Health Dept., unpublished data.
Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (8.14.14)
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Adverse Childhood Experiences…
25
…DISEASE, DISABILITY AND
SOCIAL PROBLEMS IN
ADULTHOOD
…GROWING UP IN A
HOUSEHOLD WITH ADVERSE
CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES:
…ADOPTION OF HEALTH
RISK BEHAVIORS…

Recurrent physical abuse

Recurrent emotional abuse

Sexual abuse

Smoking

An alcohol or drug abuser

Overeating

An incarcerated household member

Physical inactivity

Someone who is chronically depressed, suicidal, 
institutionalized or mentally ill

Mother being treated violently

Living with one or neither parent

Emotional or physical neglect
Heavy alcohol use

Nicotine addiction

Alcoholism

Drug addiction

Obesity

Depression

Suicide

Injuries

Unintentional pregnancy

Drug use

Adolescent pregnancy

Promiscuity

Heart disease

Cancer

Chronic lung and liver disease

Stroke

Diabetes

Fetal death

Sexually transmitted diseases
Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “What are Adverse Childhood Experieinces (ACE’s).”
The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study Pyramid
26
Death
Early Death
Disease,
Disability and
Social Problems
Adoption of Health-risk
Behaviors
Social, Emotional and Cognitive
Impairment
Disrupted Neurodevelopment
Adverse Childhood Experiences
Conception
Mechanisms by which Adverse Childhood Experiences Influence
Health and Well-being throughout the Lifespan
Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “About the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study.”
Percentage of 4th Graders NOT Proficient in Reading by Race and
Hispanic Origin: United States: 2011
28
Source: Annie E. Casey Foundation, “KIDS COUNT Data Book, 2013.”
Average Freshman Graduation Rates by Race: Tulsa Public
Schools, 2012-13 School Year
54.1%
All students
50.3%
Black
43.2%
American Indian
86.4%
Asian
51.4%
Hispanic
62.3%
White
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Note: "Average freshman graduation rate" refers to the number of graduating seniors as a proportion of the average number of students
enrolled in 8th, 9th, and 10th grades for that graduating cohort.
Source: Office of Educational Quality and Accountability, based on data provided by the Oklahoma State Department of Education.
29
Senior Graduation Rates by High School: Tulsa Public
Schools, 2012-13 School Year
78.1%
TRAICE
81.8%
Central
Memorial
89.2%
East Central
89.8%
93.0%
Webster
Edison
94.0%
McLain
94.1%
97.5%
Hale
99.0%
B.T. Washington
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Note: “Senior graduation rate" refers to the number of graduating seniors as a proportion of the number of students who were enrolled
at the beginning of senior year.
Source: Office of Educational Quality and Accountability, based on data provided by the Oklahoma State Department of Education.
30
Four-Year Dropout Rates by High School: Tulsa Public
Schools, 2012-13 School Year
47.0%
TRAICE
37.7%
Central
34.7%
Memorial
29.0%
East Central
27.3%
Webster
25.9%
McLain
Edison
12.7%
Hale
12.7%
1.3%
B.T. Washington
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Note: "Average freshman graduation rate" refers to the number of graduating seniors as a proportion of the average number of students
enrolled in 8th, 9th, and 10th grades for that graduating cohort.
Source: Office of Educational Quality and Accountability, based on data provided by the Oklahoma State Department of Education.
31
32
FINANCIAL SELF-SUFFICIENCY
Comparison of Self-Sufficiency Wage to Poverty
Guidelines, by Family Size: Tulsa County, 2014
33
Family Size
One
person
Two
persons
Three
persons
Four
persons
Self-Sufficiency
Wage (annual)
Poverty Guidelines
(annual)
Dollar
Difference
Self-Sufficiency
Percent of
Poverty
$21,764
$11,670
($10.30/hour)
($5.53/hour)
$10,094
186%
$38,995
$15,730
($18.46/hour)
($7.45/hour)
$23,265
248%
$44,627
$19,790
($21.13/hour)
($9.37/hour)
$24,837
226%
$52,318
$23,850
($24.77/hour)
($11.29/hour)
$28,468
219%
Notes: For the self-sufficiency wages shown in table, family of two consists of one adult and one preschooler; family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and
one schoolage child; family of four consists of two adults, one preschooler and one schoolage child. Hourly wages given assume full-time, year-round employment.
Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma
2009; Federal Register Notice, 01/22/2014, Annual Update of the HHS Poverty Guidelines; Bureau of Labor Statistics, July 2014.
Wage Comparison: Self-Sufficiency, Welfare, Minimum, Poverty
and 185% of Poverty, and Median Family Income: Family of
Three, Tulsa County 2014
34
$80,000
$70,000
$60,000
Annual wage
Self-sufficiency
wage: $44,627
$76,755
($36.34/hr.)
($21.13/hour)
$50,000
$54,001
$36,612
$30,000
($17.33/hr.)
$20,000
$-
All families
($25.57/hr.)
$40,000
$10,000
Married couple
families
$10,800
$15,312
($5.11/hr.)
($7.25/hr.)
Welfare wage
Minimum wage
($17.75/hr.)
Male-headed
families
$21,296
$19,790
Female-headed
families
($10.08/hr.)
($9.37/hr.)
Poverty wage
$37,479
185% poverty
wage
Median family
income
Notes: For self-sufficiency wage, family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one school-age child. Hourly wages given assume full-time, year-round
employment. Welfare wage is the combined value of TANF, SNAP, & WIC. Median family income represents families with children under age 18. Values shown for
median family income are midpoint estimates within a 90% confidence range, which can be very wide.
Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard for
Oklahoma 2009; Federal Register Notice, 01/22/2014, Annual Update of the HHS Poverty Guidelines; Bureau of Labor Statistics, July 2014; Oklahoma State Dept.
of Human Services; US Census Bureau, 2008-12 American Community Survey. (American Community Survey data are estimates based on a sample of the population.
These estimates are midpoint values within a 90% confidence range, which can be very large, especially for smaller geographies.)
Ratio of Income to Poverty by Age: Tulsa and North Tulsa, 2008-12
35
100.0%
100%
200%
87.7%
80.0%
60.0%
64.5%
49.5%
42.8%
34.5%
40.0%
20.0%
67.0%
34.5%
19.7%
0.0%
Total population
Under 6
Tulsa
Source: US Census Bureau, 2008-12 American Community Survey.
Total population
North Tulsa
Under 6
36
37
N 13th E Ave
Owasso Ex
py
E 46th St N
y
e
ok
Gilc
re
xp
St N
EE36th
e
er
Ch
ase
Exp
y
9400.06
Expy
US Hwy 412 I- 244 I- 244
Crosstown Expy US Hwy 412
I- 44 E0590 Rd
k
Hwy
S Memorial Dr
Creek Tpke
US Hwy 75
Poverty rate total
Less than 10%
10 to 24%
25 to 32%
W 151st St S
33% or higher
US
Hw
4
y6
4
Sta
te
Hw
y5
1
Bro
k
en
Arr
ow
E xp
y
US Hwy 169
S 81st E Ave
Creek Tpke
Tulsa
I- 4
64
py
Okmulgee Expy
r
Fo
US
y
Okmulgee Ex
d
Re
p
Ex
Mingo Valley Expy
State Hwy 51
State Hwy 97
Key
e
ston
Keystone Expy
US Hwy 169
9400.05
N Mingo Valley Expy
N Peoria Ave
Cherokee Expy
US Hwy 75
State Hwy 11
Poverty Rates by Census Tract
City of Tulsa, 2008-12
2014 poverty guidelines
for family of 3:
100%
= $19,790
Broken Arrow S Lp
130% = $25,727
185% = $36,612
200% = $39,580
State Hwy 67
E 151st St S
An estimated
75,636 Tulsa residents
live in poverty, for a rate of 19.7%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2008-12 American Community Survey.
Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (5/6/2014).
N 13th E Ave
Owasso Ex
py
E 46th St N
y
e
ok
Gilc
re
xp
St N
EE36th
e
er
Ch
ase
Exp
y
9400.06
Expy
US Hwy 412 I- 244 I- 244
Crosstown Expy US Hwy 412
I- 44 E0590 Rd
k
Hwy
I- 4
64
US
Hw
4
y6
4
Sta
te
Hw
y5
1
Bro
k
en
Arr
ow
E xp
y
S 81st E Ave
US Hwy 169
py
Okmulgee Expy
r
Fo
US
y
Okmulgee Ex
d
Re
p
Ex
Mingo Valley Expy
State Hwy 51
State Hwy 97
Key
e
ston
Keystone Expy
US Hwy 169
9400.05
N Mingo Valley Expy
N Peoria Ave
Cherokee Expy
US Hwy 75
State Hwy 11
Poverty Rates for Children Under 18
by Census Tract, City of Tulsa, 2008-12
Creek Tpke
US Hwy 75
Tulsa
S Memorial Dr
Creek Tpke
Poverty rate under 18
Less than 10%
W 151st St S
10 to 24%
25 to 32%
33 to 49%
50% or higher
State Hwy 67
E 151st St S
Lp
Arrow Sguidelines
2014Broken
poverty
for family of 3:
100% = $19,790
130% = $25,727
185% = $36,612
200% = $39,580
An estimated 28,883 Tulsa children
under 18 live in poverty, for a rate of 30.8%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2008-12 American Community Survey.
Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (5/6/2014).
Unemployment Rates: Tulsa, 1990-2013
40
8.0
7.3
5.3
6.0
4.6
4.0
3.1
2.0
0.0
1990
1995
2000
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics.
2005
2010
2013
41
School and Employment Status of Youth Age 16 to 19:
City of Tulsa, 2008-12
42
Total population age 16 to 19 = 21,442
2,397
11.2%
16,650
77.7%
1,740
8.1%
2,395
11.2%
Not enrolled in
school, and either
unemployed or not
in labor force
655
3.1%
Enrolled in school
Not enrolled in school: employed
Not enrolled in school: unemployed
Not enrolled in school: not in labor force
Source: US Census Bureau, 2008-12 American Community Survey.
Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission.
School and Employment Status of Youth Age 16 to 19:
North Tulsa, 2008-12
43
Total population age 16 to 19 = 3,981
448
11.3%
677
17.0%
934
23.5%
2,599
65.3%
Not enrolled in
school, and either
unemployed or not
in labor force
257
6.5%
Enrolled in school
Not enrolled in school: employed
Not enrolled in school: unemployed
Not enrolled in school: not in labor force
Source: US Census Bureau, 2008-12 American Community Survey.
Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission.
State Hwy 20
Hwy
51
k
25 to 32%
33% or more
City of Tulsa: 11.2% (2,395)
Tulsa County: 10.3% (3,356)
44
N Mingo Valley
Expy
Cherokee Expy
py
Arro
wE
xpy
Sta
te H
wy
51
Creek Tpke
Creek Tpke
Broken Ar
row S Lp
S Union Ave S Union Ave
US Hwy 75
Less than 10%
10 to 24%
Ex
py
Crosstown Expy I- 244 I- 44
I- 44
Bro
ke n
Okmulgee Expy
d
Re
r
Fo
e Ex
US Hwy 412 I- 244
US Hwy 64
Tulsa
Disconnected Youth
e Expy
9400.06
State Hwy 51
12
py
wy 4
US H
State Hwy 97
21st St S
ston
e Ex
Gilcre
as
S Memorial Dr
State
US Hwy 75
Key
US Hwy 64
Cheroke
9400.05
N 13th E Ave N Peoria Ave
State Hwy 11
E 146th St N
US Hwy 169
Disconnected youth age 16 to 19:
youth that are not enrolled in school
and are either unemployed or not
in the labor force.
Mingo Valley Expy
N 4th W Ave
N Yale Ave
Percent Disconnected Youth Age 16 to19
By Census Tract, 2008-12
State Hwy 67
E 171st St S
E 167th St S
Source: US Census Bureau, 2008-12 American Community Survey.
Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (4/24/2014).
School and Employment Status of Youth Age 20 to 24: Central Tulsa
County (part of City of Tulsa), 2008-12
45
Estimated population age 20 to 24 = 17,470
8,170
46.8%
2,194
12.6%
2,665
15.3%
471
2.7%
6,635
38.0%
Not enrolled in
school, and either
unemployed or not
in labor force
Enrolled in school
Not enrolled in school: employed
Not enrolled in school: unemployed
Not enrolled in school: not in labor force
Source: US Census Bureau, 2008-12 American Community Survey PUMS.
Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission.
E 146th St N
State Hwy 20
Hwy
51
9400.06
State Hwy 51
12
py
wy 4
US H
k
d
Re
r
Fo
Ex
Expy
Cherokee Expy
N Mingo Valley
e Ex
Bro
ke n
py
py
Crosstown Expy I- 244 I- 44
I- 44
US Hwy 412 I- 244
US Hwy 64
Okmulgee Expy
State Hwy 97
21st St S
ston
e Ex
Gilcre
as
Arro
US Hwy 169
State
US Hwy 75
Key
US Hwy 64
e Expy
9400.05
A third of Tulsa's youth
age 20 to 24 are enrolled
in school.
Cheroke
The data do not indicate if the
youth that are not working
are enrolled in school.
N 13th E Ave N Peoria Ave
State Hwy 11
Disconnected youth age 20 to 24:
youth that are either unemployed
or not in the labor force.
Mingo Valley Expy
N 4th W Ave
N Yale Ave
Percent Disconnected Youth Age 20 to 24
By Census Tract, 2008-12
wE
xpy
Sta
te H
wy
51
Tulsa
Creek Tpke
Disconnected Youth
33 to 49%
50% or more
City of Tulsa: 30.1% (9,315)
Tulsa County: 29.1% (12,335)
46
S Memorial Dr
10 to 24%
25 to 32%
Broken Ar
row S Lp
S Union Ave S Union Ave
US Hwy 75
Less than 10%
Creek Tpke
State Hwy 67
E 171st St S
E 167th St S
Source: US Census Bureau, 2008-12 American Community Survey.
Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (4/24/2014).
Real hourly wage by educational attainment
United states, 1973-2012
47
2012 dollars
$45
$37.34
$40
$35
$29.56
$30
$25
$20
$15
$10
$28.28
$24.46
$18.06
$17.30
$16.77
$15.78
$14.63
$11.75
$5
$0
1973
1976
1979
Less than high school
1982
1985
1988
High school
1991
1994
1997
Some college
Source: Economic Policy Institute, The State of Working America, 12th Edition, table 4.14.
2000
2003
College
2006
2009
2012
Advanced degree
Educational Attainment for Persons Age 25 & over:
Tulsa and North Tulsa, 2008-12
48
25.4%
Less than high school
13.4%
37.4%
High school graduate
26.1%
23.5%
Some college
23.5%
5.2%
Associate degree
North Tulsa
Tulsa
7.3%
6.4%
Bachelor's degree
19.6%
2.1%
Advanced degree
0.0%
10.2%
5.0%
10.0%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2008-12 American Community Survey.
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
49
Participation in Public Assistance Programs
Number of Participants and Percentage of Population Participating
During a Single Month, Tulsa County, 2012
Soonercare Total (185%/100%)
19.3%
116,415
Soonercare <19 (185%)
47%
76,569
14.8%
89,325
1.8%
2,720
TANF <18 (50%)
55.1%
34,358
Elem. School Free Lunch (130%)
10.1%
6,314
Elem. School Reduced Lunch (185%)
100,000
50,000
Number of Participants
50
8.2%
3,667
Child Care Subsidy <5 (185%)
150,000
20.2%
9,063
WIC age 1-5 (185%)
SNAP Total (130%)
43.5%
3,829
WIC Infants (185%)
0%
0
20%
40%
60%
80%
Percent of Population
Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Statistical Bulletin, Jan. 2012; Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2011-12; US Census Bureau,
2010 Census; Oklahoma State Department of Health-WIC Service, Caseload Report, Jan. 2012; Oklahoma Health Care Authority, Fast Facts, Jan.2012.
Elementary School Students Eligible for Free and Reduced
Lunch Program: Selected North Tulsa Elementary Schools,
2012-13 school year
51
TPS Elementary total
81.4%
9.2%
Chouteau
82.4%
8.2%
Springdale
Owen
Free
Reduced
100.0%
0.0%
90.9%
9.1%
McKinley
95.0%
5.0%
Mitchell
95.6%
4.4%
Hamilton
96.0%
4.0%
83.6%
Bell
12.5%
99.4%
0.6%
Gilcrease
100.0%
0.0%
Penn
100.0%
0.0%
Celia Clinton
80.6%
Kendall-Whittier
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
Source: Oklahoma State Dept of Education, Low Income Report for 2013-14.
8.9%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
52
HEALTH STATUS
Overall Health Status Ranking: Oklahoma, 1990-2013
53
49
48
50
41
40
36
38
42
39
41
43
44
41
41
46
43
42
44
47
49
46 46 46
32 32
30
20
10
0
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings 2013.”
44
Oklahoma’s Rankings in Health Determinants, 2013
54
1=Healthiest state
50=Least healthy state
43
All Determinants
39
Behaviors
Smoking
46
45
44
Drug deaths
Obesity
Physical inactivity
27
Policy &
Clinical Care
Community &
Environment
HS graduation
41
Violent crime
45
Occup. fatalities
Infectious disease
18
46
Children in poverty
32
Lack of health insurance
Public health funding
Immunization - children
Primary care physicians
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings 2013.”
26
48
48
Oklahoma’s Rankings in Health Outcomes, 2013
55
1=Healthiest state
50=Least healthy state
45
All Outcomes
43
Diabetes
41
Poor mental health days
42
Poor physical health days
Disparity in health status (education)
Infant mortality rate
27
44
48
Cardiovascular deaths
Cancer deaths
Premature death
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings 2013.”
43
47
Low Health Status: Oklahoma and United States, 1996-2013
56
25%
Percent of adults reporting fair or poor health
20.5%20.2%
20.2%
19.7%
19.6%
19.2%
19.0%
18.7%
18.7%
17.7%17.8%
19.6%
20%
17.4%
15.3%
15%
10%
17.9%
16.9%
14.0%
13.4%
13.1%
12.6%
14.7%14.7%14.9%14.8%14.7%14.9%14.4%14.5%14.7%
13.9%14.0%
12.9%12.9%12.8%12.6%13.0%
Oklahoma
45
42
U.S.
32
26
5%
41 41
44 42 46 43 42 42 45
41
34
28
38
25
Oklahoma’s rank
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
0%
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
Note: Data for 2011 and 2012 are not directly comparable to previous years because of changes in weighting and sampling.
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings 2013.”
Obesity Prevalence: Oklahoma and United States, 1990-2013
57
35%
Percent of adults estimated to be obese
Oklahoma
32.0%
31.3% 32.2%
31.0%
31.1%
U.S.
28.8% 28.8%
26.8%
24.9%
24.4%
27.8%
26.9%
25%
22.9%
26.3%
27.6%
22.6%
27.5%
25.1%
21.1%
26.7%
24.4%
19.5% 19.7%
22.9%
21.9%
20%
23.2%
20.9%
16.8%
15.1%
19.6%
13.5%
20.0%
13.2%
14.1%12.1%
18.3%
15%
11.9%
16.8%
11.6%11.6%
16.5%
45 45
44 43 46 46
15.9%
12.6% 14.4%
40
38
37
37 37 38
10% 11.6%11.6%12.6% 13.7%
35 37
30%
23 23 22
5%
29
27
22
14 14 12
14
Oklahoma’s rank
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
0%
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Note: Data for 2011 and 2012 are not directly comparable to previous years because of changes in weighting and sampling.
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings 2013.”
Smoking Prevalence: Oklahoma and United States, 1990-2013
58
Percent of adults who are current smokers
35% 33.0%
30%
29.5%
25%
20%
15%
28.7%
28.7%
26.6%
28.7%
26.6% 26.1%
26.1%
25.1% 25.8% 25.5% 26.1%
24.6% 25.2%
24.7% 23.7%
25.1%
25.0%
25.1%
24.1% 23.9%
23.3%
23.3%
21.7%
25.2%25.2%
23.5%
23.2%
22.7%
23.2% 22.8%23.2%
23.2%22.0%
22.7%
23.0%
22.9%
22.2%
21.2%
20.9%20.6% 19.8%
19.6%
20.1%
18.4%17.9% 17.3%
Oklahoma
U.S.
44 42 42
40
10%
49
45
41
37
36
28
5%
15
47 46 47 48 46 48 48 47
42
36
32
39
27
Oklahoma’s rank
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
0%
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Note: Data for 2011 and 2012 are not directly comparable to previous years because of changes in sampling methodology.
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings 2013.”
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
Conclusion
Contact Information:
Melanie Poulter
Senior Planner, Demography and Geography
Community Service Council
www.csctulsa.org
918-295-1285
mpoulter@csctulsa.org
71