Benefit Delivery System Models Is Integration of Services an Effective Model in Today’s Marketplace EAPA Chesepeake Chapter, MD September 1. 2011 Patricia A. Herlihy Ph.D, R.N EAP, Work/Life & Wellness Paradoxes “Life will never be easy or perfectible or completely predictable. It will be best understood backward, but we have to live it forward. To make it livable at all levels we have to learn to use the paradoxes to balance contradictions and inconsistencies as an invitation to find a better way” Charles Handy, 1994 EAP, Work/Life & Wellness Related Research National Survey of EAP and W/L programs (1993) National Survey of EAP & W/L Professionals (2000) International Survey of EAP, W/L and Wellness Vendors (2002) Longitudinal Study of EAP, W/L and Wellness Programs (1990- 2008) EAP, Work/Life & Wellness Definitions EAPs - set of professional services specifically designed to improve and/or maintain the productivity and healthy functioning of the workplace and to address a work organization particular business needs (EAPA 2011) Work Life - A business strategy based on the knowledge that active support for employee success at work AND at home yields bottom line benefits for all stakeholders (AWLP 2011) Wellness - A state of well-being in which every individual realizes his or her potential, can cope with the normal stresses of life, can work productively, and is able is make a contribution to his or her family and community" (World Health Organization, 2007) EAP, Work/Life & Wellness Variations in Delivery Models EAP, Work/Life & Wellness Concept of Integration Quality of the state of collaboration that exists among departments required to achieve unity of effort by the demands of the environment (Lawrence & Lorsch, 1967) EAP, Work/Life & Wellness National Survey of EAP & Work Life Programs (1993) 10% of respondents reported being integrated 75% of the respondents viewed EAP and Work Family Programs as separate programs Corporate culture A key indicator for collaboration of efforts in designing benefit delivery services EAP, Work/Life & Wellness Changes in Integration over Time EAP, Work/Life & Wellness Comparison of Findings S E R V I C E S 1993 & 2008 Integration defined differently and more broadly EAP & Work/Life collaborate more often Wellness push by Unions Internal EAPs (18%) reported the least integration EAP, Work/Life & Wellness Wellness - New Piece of Puzzle EAP Wellness EAP, Work/Life & Wellness Work/Life End Users/ Employees Unions Role in Delivery Models 46% of Sample in 2008 Study had unions (National Average : 7% in private -38% Gov) Majority of companies report unions are supportive of all three services Several companies roll out new products to Union first for approval - then to general employee population Some respondents reported tension between what Union versus non-union employees receive EAP, Work/Life & Wellness Summary Findings - 2008 43% of Companies interviewed (08) still on Working Mother’s Best 100 Companies 47% of Companies with either 2 or 3 services integrated - use one vendor EAP, Work/Life & Wellness Variations of Models Internal EAPs* 18% EAP & W/L EAP & Wellness W/L & Wellness 62% 23% 15% * Internal EAPs in this sample did not facilitate an integrative model of service delivery EAP, Work/Life & Wellness Emerging Models Major Umbrella overseeing 6 employee benefit services (ie Diversity, Disease Management, and Disability) Higher level Strategic Team overseeing all employee benefit services Health & Productivity- measure their demographic, participation & outcome metrics - using to measure integration of all the employee services EAP, Work/Life & Wellness Michigan Study -Research Observations Impressive resiliency of these programs Increasing move to design Targeted Programs for specific populations (ie: Parents of Disabled children) Move to outsource services as method of decreasing costs including Human Relations Services Creative models of collaboration at administrative & functional levels Questions about the future: Will these three programs continue or morph into a new service? EAP, Work/Life & Wellness Factors Supporting Integration Natural Disasters: 9/11, Katrina, Ike, blizzards, flooding etc Campus Wide Crises: school shootings, meningitis outbreaks, alcohol related deaths, terrorism threats, etc. Union support for better quality services Simplification of Administration operations EAP, Work/Life & Wellness Barriers to Integration Model Multiple Vendors and wanting tighter control Corporate Culture of Decentralization ingrained over time Concern about decrease in Quality of Services if integrated Confidentiality Concerns - Major Stumbling Block Legal Issues in terms of working with spouse and/or dependent New Administration not focused on Employee Services due to other more pressing business concerns EAP, Work/Life & Wellness Low Touch vs High Touch Low Touch: High Touch: Websites Posters Brochures EAP, Work/Life & Wellness Phone calls Conferences Meetings Research Interest from Respondents Cost Benefit Analysis Models for providing these services globally How have other companies sustained interest in these programs in difficult financial market Demonstrate Effectiveness of Integrated Model How to measure impact of programs on productivity Demographics - prepare for the Aging Workforce while still providing services for younger workers EAP, Work/Life & Wellness Current Trends EAP, Work/Life & Wellness Major Lesson Learned One Size Does Not Fit All!!! EAP, Work/Life & Wellness