Inland Terminals, Logistic Clusters and Global Commodity Chains

advertisement

5 th Annual Supply Chain Connections Conference,

Winnipeg, February 11, 2009

Inland Terminals, Logistic Clusters and Global Commodity Chains:

Looking Into the Eye of the Storm

Jean-Paul Rodrigue

Associate Professor, Dept. of Global Studies &

Geography, Hofstra University, New York, USA

Van Horne Researcher in Transportation and

Logistics, University of Calgary, Alberta,

Canada

Inland Terminals: The Eye of the Storm

Containerized

Trade

Trade

Imbalances

Terminalization

Governance

Questioning growth prospects.

Paradigm shift (forecasting…).

Imbalanced flows and shipping rates.

Load centers for empties on backhauls to ports.

Integrating inland terminals, corridors and commodity chains.

Including inland terminals within public policy and regional planning.

Value capture.

Global Containerized Trade: Prepare to be

Disappointed

Potential Divergence: The First Crisis of

Globalization

Container yard, Port of Yantian, China

Impact of Recessions on Consumption and Freight

Rates

Significant

Decline

None

Low

Significant

Decline

Severity

Value of Goods

Consumption

A – Basic Goods

B – Discretionary Goods

C – Durable Goods

D – Capital Equipment

E – Luxury Goods

High

Trade and Freight Rates

1 – Futures Indexes

2 – Income and Spending

3 – Container Volumes

4 – Value of Trade

None

Sequence

Futures Indexes: The Current Trend is Strongly

Deflationary…

12000

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

Baltic Dry Index

Dow Jones Industrial

0

15000

14000

13000

12000

11000

10000

9000

8000

7000

Annual Light Vehicle Sales, United States, January

2008 – January 2009 (millions)

-36.8%

-42.3%

-22.9%

450 000

400 000

350 000

300 000

250 000

200 000

150 000

100 000

50 000

0

Port of Los Angeles (Monthly TEUs), 1995-2008:

Peaking … and About to Fall Off a Cliff?

Out Empty

Out Loaded

In Loaded

World Container Traffic, 1980-2008. Reaching Peak

Growth?

Adoption Acceleration Peak Growth Maturity

1000

900

800

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

1980

1966-1992

1985 1990

1992-2002

1995 2000

2002-2010(?)

2005 2010

2010(?) -

Divergence

2015 2020

Global Bulk and Container Fleet Partially

Immobilized (Singapore, January 2009)

Cars Accumulating at the Long Beach Port Terminal,

December 2008

Trade Imbalances: Coping with Distortions

Transport Flows

Transport Rates

Inland Terminals and Repositioning

NS Rutherford Inland Terminal, Pennsylvania

Containerized Cargo Flows along Major Trade

Routes, 1995-2007 (in millions of TEUs)

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1998

1995

0

15.4

15.0

12.4

4.4

4.9

4.7

10.8

2.1

3.8

12.4

10.2

4.1

4.2

7.3

8.9

5.2

4.9

1.7

2.9

1.7

3.2

8.8

7.2

5.6

3.3

3.9

3.9

5.9

6.1

4.2

1.5

2.6

4.0

2.7

3.6

4.5

3.6

2.2

2.9

5.2

4.0

3.3

3.5

2.7

1.3

1.7

3.5

2.8

2.3

1.2

1.4

15.3

17.7

5.5

9.1

10.0

2.7

2.5

4.4

4.5

Asia-USA

USA-Asia

Asia-Europe

Europe-Asia

USA-Europe

Europe-USA

10 20 30 40 50 60

Containerized Cargo Flows along Major Trade

Routes, 2007

Million TEUs Growth (2000-2007)

15.4 (+175%)

19.9

USA

7.6

4.9 (+48%)

14.9

Asia

33.1

10.0 (+178%)

2.7 (+23%)

4.5 (+55%)

Imports (M TEUs)

20.4

Europe

14.5

Exports (M TEUs)

17.7 (+293%)

Maritime Freight Rates (Nominal USD per TEU), 1993-

2008

$2,500

$2,000

$1,500

$1,000

$500

Asia - US

US - Asia

Asia - Europe

Europe - Asia

$0

Geographical Levels of Empty Container

Repositioning

Hinterland

Regional

Repositioning

Inter-Regional

Repositioning

(coastal / fluvial)

Port Depot / Inland terminal Freight Distribution Cluster

Foreland

Cargo Rotation

Main North American Trade Corridors and

Metropolitan Freight Centers

1) Efficient repositioning

2) Cargo rotation

3) Export market

Bulk and Containerized Commodity Chains

Supplier

Bulk Commodity Chain

Customer

Port

Point-to-Point

Consolidation center

Complementarity

Container port

Pendulum

Services Inland Terminal

Containerized Commodity Chain

Several Established Containerized Commodity

Chains in Western Canada

Terminalization and Inland Terminals

Economies of Scale: A Hard Pill to Swallow

Terminalization and Supply Chains

Extended Distribution Centers

Trimodal Container Terminal, Willebroek, Belgium

Type and Function of Inland Terminals

Load center

Corridor

Type

Satellite terminal

Freight distribution cluster

/ load center

Intermodal / Transmodal facility

Function

Close to a port facility. Accommodate additional traffic and serve functions that have become too expensive at the port. Container transloading.

Access regional markets (production and consumption). Intermodal, warehousing, and logistics functions. Linked with logistics parks and free trade zones.

Link large systems of freight circulation either through the same mode (e.g. rail-to-rail) or through intermodalism (e.g. rail-to-truck).

The Largest Available Containership, 1970-2007 (in

TEUs)

14,000

12,000

10,000

8,000

6,000

4,000

2,000

0

19

70

19

72

19

74

19

76

19

78

19

80

19

82

19

84

19

86

19

88

19

90

19

92

19

94

19

96

19

98

20

00

20

02

20

04

20

06

Hinterland Logistics: The Realm of the “Last Mile”

(or the “First Mile”)

Massification

GLOBAL

Shipping Network

Gateway

Atomization

Frequency

REGIONAL LOCAL

Capacity

HINTERLAND

Corridor

Inland

Terminal

Segment

Customer

Distribution

Center

“Last Mile”

Massification of Inland Terminals: Automated

Transfer Management Systems

Supply Chain Terminalization: Import Flows to the

Hinterland

Suppliers

Foreland (First Mile)

Gateway

Offshore Hub

Bottleneck

Buffer

Distribution center (outbound / inbound)

Inland containerized goods flow

Inland non-containerized goods flow

Maritime container flow

Gateway

Inland

Terminal

Customers

Port regionalization and the creation of a Regional Load Center Network

Extended Gate (Inland terminals)

Extended Distribution Center (Terminal as

A warehousing unit)

Hinterland (Last Mile)

Container Transloading: Could it Move Inland?

Cause

Consolidation

Outcome

Transferring the contents of smaller containers into larger containers (e.g. three maritime 40 foot containers into two 53 foot domestic containers). Cost savings (number of lifts). Time delays.

Weight compliance Transferring the contents of heavy containers into loads meeting national or regional road weight limits.

Palletizing Placing loose (floor loaded) containerized cargo unto pallets.

Adapting to local load units (e.g. europallet).

Demurrage

Equipment availability

Supply chain management

Handing back containers to owner (maritime shipping or leasing company) by transferring its contents into another load unit (e.g. domestic container) to avoid charges.

Making maritime containers available for exports and domestic containers available for imports. Trade facilitation.

Terminal and transloading facility as a buffer. Delay decision to route freight to better fulfill regional demands. Perform some added value activities (packaging, labeling, final assembly, etc.)

Governance and Inland Terminals

Terminal Operators and Value Capture

Regional Integration as Logistics Clusters

Uiwang Inland Container Depot, South Korea

The Value Capture Process along Commodity Chains

Horizontal Integration

Maritime Services

Port Services

Inland Services

Vertical Integration

Port

Offshore hub

Port Holding

Inland

Port

Maritime

Shipping

Port Terminal

Operations

Inland Modes and Terminals

Commodity Chain

Distribution

Centers

Inland Terminals: Operations and Added Value

Core

(Operations)

Ancillary

(Added

Value)

Infrastructure

Equipment

Storage

Modal access (dock, siding, road), unloading areas

Intermodal lifting equipment, storing equipment

Yard for empty and loaded containers

Management Administration, maintenance, access (gates), information systems

Trade facilitation Free trade zone, logistical services

Distribution centers

Transloading, cross-docking, warehousing, light manufacturing, temperature controlled facilities

(cold chain)

Container depot, bulk storage Storage depot

Container services

Washing, preparation, repair, worthiness certification

Scope

Functional Integration of Freight Clusters

FTZ

Logistic Pole

Logistic Cluster

Logistic Zone

Distribution center

Terminal / Depot

Port

Scale

Free Trade Zones: Setting The Rules

Infrastructures High level of infrastructure, such as land, transport, office space, utilities, logistics services, business services and other facilities.

Regulations Streamlined to improve efficiency, including custom services, labor regulation and permits.

Location High accessibility location, often close to major terminal facilities such as a port, inland terminal or an airport. Location often away from conventional industry.

Export-oriented Activities operating within the zone produce mainly or exclusively for foreign markets.

Incentives Variety of incentives, including low cost land, infrastructures, tax and duty exemptions or various subsidies.

Free Trade Zones: “Bending the Rules”

Custom

Clearance

Duties

Done inland instead of at the gateway port.

Likely faster.

Receiver gets further advance notice.

Not paid until the consignment is released and moved out of the FTZ.

If transformation is performed in the FTZ, the duty class may change.

Select the taxation regime.

Settlement If combined with Warehousing.

Vendors often not paid until the freight leaves the terminal for delivery.

Inland Terminals: The Calm after the Storm (lessons to be learned)

Rebalancing of the global economy

Repositioning strategies

Terminalization (intermodal integration)

Logistics cluster (regional integration)

Download