A Study of Admission Requirements, Curricula

advertisement

5th Annual Hawaii International

Conference on Education,

January 06-09, 2007, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA

“A Study of Admission Requirements, Curricula, and Program

Requirements of Ph.D. Programs in Human Resource

Development/Similar Fields at U.S. Universities” by

Vichet Sum, M.M.S, M.T.D, PH.D. (in process) http://www.vichetsum.com

[ Outline ]

Abstract

Introduction

Highlight of Literature Review

Methodology

Findings

Conclusion and Recommendations

Questions & Comments

[ Abstract ]

Admission requirements, curricula and program requirements.

An important reference.

Ph.D. program development assistance.

[ Introduction ]

HRD is a “bread and butter activity”.

(Gray, 1997)

Strong demand for advanced degrees in HRD.

(Gray, 1997)

Ph.D. program development.

[ Introduction (Cont’d) ]

The Purpose of this Study

To collect crucial information regarding admission requirements, curricula, program requirements of

Ph.D. programs in HRD/similar fields.

[ Introduction (Cont’d) ]

Significance of this Study

An important reference for the creation of the

Ph.D. program in HRD/similar fields.

[ Introduction (Cont’d) ]

Research Questions

1. What are the current admission requirements for a Ph.D. program in HRD/similar fields?

2. What courses are offered in Ph.D. programs in

HRD/similar fields?

3. What are the program requirements of Ph.D. programs in HRD/similar fields?

[ Introduction (Cont’d) ]

Delimitation

Limited to Ph.D. programs in HRD/similar fields from U.S universities that are currently offering a

Ph.D. program in this field.

[ Introduction (Cont’d) ]

Limitation

The universities’ websites may not contain all the information related to admission requirements, courses and program requirements.

[ Highlight of Literature Review ]

Development of HRD programs.

(Kuchinke, 2001; Gaudet & Vincent, 1993)

Offering of certificates and degrees in HRD.

(Chalofsky & Larson-Dougherty, 1996)

Profiling professors of HRD.

(Peterson and Provo, 1996)

Recent changes in HRD programs.

(Milton, Watkins, Spears & Burch, 2000)

[ Highlight of Literature Review (Cont’d) ]

HRD curriculum development.

(Hatcher, 1998; Gay, 1997; Willis & Kahnweiler, 1995; Baylen,

Bailey, & Samardzija, 1996; Leach, 1993; Dare & Leach, 1999;

Kuchinke, 2002)

HRD Definitions.

(McLagan, 1989; Swanson, 1995; Watkins & Marsick, 1993;

Kuchinke, 1999; McLean & Mclean, 2001)

History and Institutional Characteristics of HRD programs.

(Kuchinke, 2002)

[ Methodology ]

Target Population

Ph.D. programs in human resource development/workforce development, career development, organizational development, and/or training and development.

Sample

Doctoral programs in HRD/similar fields in U.S. universities.

[ Methodology (Cont’d) ]

Sampling Procedure

Purposive sampling is a non-probability method that follows specific criteria to collect information.

(Cooper & Schindler, 1998)

Data Collection

- University Websites were accessed and scanned.

- Selection criteria were degree title and program name.

- 14 Ph.D. programs were examined and considered.

[ Methodology (Cont’d) ]

Data Source http://www.hre.uiuc.edu/ucwhre

(The University Council for

Workforce and Human Resource Education) and http://www.gradschools.com.

Data Analysis

- Conceptual content analysis.

(Krippendoft, 1980; Palmquist, Carley, & Dale, 1997)

- Summarization of important data in each of the programs examined.

(Stewart & Shamdasani, 1990)

[ Findings ]

Fourteen Universities:

Barry University (BU)

- Boston University (BOU)

Colorado State University (CSU)

Florida International University (FIU)

George Washington University (GWU)

Georgia State University (GSU)

Ohio State University (OSU)

Pennsylvania State University (PSU)

Southern Illinois University Carbondale (SIUC)

University of Georgia (UG)

University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign (UI)

University of Louisville (UL),

University of Minnesota (UM),

University of North Texas (UNT)

[ Findings (Cont’d) ]

Admission Requirements (Table 1)

[ Findings (Cont’d) ]

Curricula

Number of Core Courses

Universities

PSU

BU and UM

GSU, SIUC, and UNT

FIU and GWU

BOU, CSU, OSU, UI, and UL

UG

Number of Core Courses

7

6

5

10

9

4

[ Findings (Cont’d) ]

Curricula

Number of Research Courses

Universities

GWU and UG

BU, CSU, GSU, OSU, UL, UM, and UNT

BOU and UI

FIU

PSU and SIUC

Number of Research Courses

6

5

4

3

2

[ Findings (Cont’d) ]

Curricula

Number of Elective Courses

Universities

UI

UM

UL and UNT

GWU

SIUC

CSU and GSU

BU and FIU

UG

BOU, OSU and PSU

Number of Elective Courses

38

28

21

18

17

15

12

9

N/A

[ Findings (Cont’d) ]

Common Attributes of Required Courses

[ Findings (Cont’d) ]

Program Requirements (Table 4)

[ Conclusion and Recommendations ]

Similar admission requirements among the universities.

An institution can study and assess these criteria to determine admission requirements for its Ph.D. program in HRD.

[ Conclusion and Recommendations (Cont’d) ]

Development of Ph.D. program of study based on the attributes of human resource development/similar category, educational theories/philosophy organizational studies, research methods, and statistics.

Table 4 shows program requirement criteria at the universities.

An institution can adopt these criteria in developing its Ph.D. program requirements.

[ Conclusion and Recommendations (Cont’d) ]

A few directions for future study include:

1. The development of an accrediting agency for the

HRD field.

2. The impact of admission requirements on applicants’ success in the Ph.D. program in HRD.

3. The comparison, effectiveness and accountability of programs of study in a Ph.D. program in HRD.

4. The challenges of the development and creation of a

Ph.D. program in HRD.

Thank You!

Questions

Download