SOCIETIES CREATE DEVIANCE….How? Deviant Act Society creates deviance in a few ways: • societal arrangements create conditions for deviant acts • Societies create rules and sanctions for rule violation Self-Concept/labeling Formed in relation to other people because we identify with institutions in society and significant others Internalize subtle cues and overt cues Power to deflect a deviant label is unequally distributed Differential Social Power Power to apply or deflect a deviant label is not equally available Saints and roughnecks article Police & the black male article Homicide victims by race: 49% are white 49% are African American 2% other Perspectives FUNCTIONALISM Socialization is the primary mechanism for integrating people into society Much socialization is successful; sometimes it does not work properly, which leads to deviance Deviance is result of role and value conflicts, societal dysfunction • We need conformity for society to function • We need social control to function Conflict Perspective Harm is the injustice done to large groups of marginalized people Socialization & laws support the interests of the dominant order or class Socialization can be coercive or subtle (mass media) Socialization is a way to ensure that the unequal divisions in society remain Symbolic Interactionist Socialization is how we get our self-concepts We learn who we are through our interactions with others We learn to be deviant or learn our deviant identities from others Much deviant behavior is learned in a social process (learning theory) Deviant labels effect our self-concepts (labeling theory) LABELING THEORY Howard Becker and Edwin Lemert (1960s) Combines Conflict and Symbolic Interaction How so? Deviance is not something in the act itself but in the labeling of the act and the actor • Labels involve social power Deviance is dependent upon audience interpretation Most deviance undetected (so does that deviance even exist?) Deviant labels have consequences for individual self-identity • Self-fulfilling prophecy • Labeling Theory says: Everyone deviates • So “why” is not important question The categories of deviant/non-deviant are socially constructed (i.e. made up by people, not intrinsically real) Labeling theory argues that a negative label will enhance one’s deviance by Exacting consequences that affect life chances Changing self-concept in such a way as to make deviant status one’s “master status” • Primary deviance • Secondary deviance Labeling creates a self-fulfilling prophecy Assumptions of Labeling Theory Variety of causes or influences lead to initial (primary) deviance Official label after detection Labeling changes self-concept/identity Continued involvement in deviance Amplification of deviance (secondary deviance) Becker’s Typology NOT LABELED RULE ABIDING LABELED Conforming Falsely Citizen Accused RULE Secret BREAKING Deviant “Pure” Deviant Evidence? What does labeling theory explain? Those formally processed What does it not explain? Lots! Deviant careers can develop without labeling • embezzlement, secret sexual lives, white collar crime • Applies mostly to lower income crimes • Tertiary deviance= social movement formation, political activism, resistance Evidence re: juveniles Question… Which do you think is true? If there are two kids who get picked up by police for knocking over a mailbox. Kid A gets released to his parents; Kid B gets processed in juvenile court. 1.Kid A is more likely to become an adult criminal 2. Kid B is more likely to become an adult criminal Learning theory Differential Association Theory Deviance is learned • Face to face interaction with others • “excess of definitions favorable to committing crimes” Opposes biological models • Opposes idea that deviance caused by mental illness