SUCCESS – WHEN ALL ELSE FAILS LESSONS FROM ECFIBER Bringing a Community-Owned, SubscriberFunded, Universal, Open-Access FiberOptic Network to East Central Vermont What is ECFiber? consortium of 24 towns organized as “interlocal contract” a legal municipality currently in process of re-organization into “municipal utility district” governed by a board of representatives appointed by town governments ECFiber’s territory is one of the most rural areas in one of the most rural states in the USA WHAT DO WE MEAN BY RURAL? Population in Kansas towns is densely clustered with large open spaces between towns Pop = 2685 ECFiber NOC, Royalton, VT. Pop = 2500 Population in Vermont “towns” is widely scattered; town “centers” are small VERMONT CONDITIONS: NOT FOR THE FAINT OF HEART (TEMP = -10 DEG F) A BRIEF HISTORY 2005-2007: A FEW TOWNS FORMED BB COMMITTEES; SOLICITED PRIVATE SECTOR TO BUILD BB FAILURE 2007: 23 TOWNS ORGANIZED AS “INTER-LOCAL CONTRACT 2008: SOUGHT ISSUANCE OF DEBT INSTRUMENTS IN PUBLIC CAPITAL MARKETS GLOBAL FINANCIAL COLLAPSE - FAILURE 2009 – 2010: SOUGHT RUS AND ARRA FINANCING [5 applications] ALL DENIED. FAILURE A BRIEF HISTORY 2011 TO DATE: SELF-HELP BOOTSTRAP: RAISED OVER $6 MILLION VIA LOCAL “CROWD FUNDING” SUCCESS! 451 INDIVIDUAL LENDERS; minimum note = $2500; MEDIAN NOTE PURCHASE = $5000 TODAY: 200 MILES OF FIBER-OPTIC NETWORK IN 16 TOWNS 1000 CUSTOMERS AND GROWING (1000th customer 3/31/15: First Congregational Church, Thetford Hill, VT, founded 1773) INTERNET AND TELEPHONE SERVICE TO 400 MBPS SYMMETRICAL; 1 GBPS PLANNED FOR 2015 2015 PLANNED EXPANSION TO 300 MILES OF NETWORK IN 19 TOWNS, 1500 CUSTOMERS EBITDA POSITIVE AT END OF 2014; REACH CASH FLOW POSITIVE BY 2016 HOW DID WE GET FROM THERE TO HERE? Enterprises have typical financial life-cycles: PHASE I: Start-ups financed with equity (stockholders) or grants PHASE II: Reliable revenue stream; Fixed assets collateralized for secured loans PHASE III: At maturity: mix of equity, senior debt, subordinated debt TYPICAL LIFE-CYCLE DIFFICULT FOR MUNI TELECOM PRIVATE EQUITY NOT RELEVANT; NO POTENTIAL FOR LARGE UP-SIDE GAIN DEMANDED BY PE MARKET BONDING/TAX BASE = POLITICAL CHALLENGE [prohibited in Vermont except for municipal administration’s own infrastructure] CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS CAN’T SCALE TO CAPITALINTENSIVE TELECOM PROJECTS WHEN ALL ELSE FAILED – THE ECFIBER SOLUTION (part i): BUILDING ON OUR STRENGTHS Communities felt an urgent need: 15% of households have business in the home – endangered by lack of broadband; communities in danger of decline Historic experience of doing things together without outside help (libraries, fire and rescue services, etc.) Municipal status of organization: ability to issue tax-exempt debt WHEN ALL ELSE FAILED – THE ECFIBER SOLUTION (part ii): THE FINANCING MECHANISM ECF consortium formed wholly-owned LLC with status as municipality; LLC issues unsecured “triple tax-exempt” promissory notes via “private placement” – low regulatory burden interest rate (before tax benefit) of 7.5% over 15 years with 18 month holiday to allow for lag before revenue stream realized [attractive option for people of modest means] citizens organize community meetings to explain process; most notes bought by residents wanting service and to protect their communities WHEN ALL ELSE FAILED – THE ECFIBER SOLUTION (part iii) subordination agreement required; becomes “quasi equity” on balance sheet [to facilitate potential major financing in the future] minimum denomination = $2500 [reduce administrative burden while enabling affordability] Offering Memorandum vetted by legal counsel; provided only on request of potential lender RESULT: $6.3 million raised to date; over 400 individual investors (lenders); median investment = $5000 ADVANTAGES to LENDERS Community control – no dependence on volatile capital markets; little risk of sale or foreclosure in adversity Lenders have stake in success of enterprise – their focus is on delivery of BB services – oversight and discipline Generous return to lenders (but commensurate with risk!); anchors community; increases home values and sale-ability ADVANTAGES to ENTERPRISE Enables timely and efficient deployment – no bureaucracy Patient capital Strong customer commitment; ECFiber has virtually zero churn – no customers lost to competitors despite increasingly competitive market Subordinated debt can become “quasi equity” in refinancing DISADVANTAGES OF THIS SYSTEM It is slow. Funds are raised neighborhood by neighborhood as the network expands. This constrains the rate of growth. ECFiber is committed to serving 100% of its population; with this system, and 1500 miles of road, that could take 17 more years Result: frustration among those citizens who are not near the existing parts of the network Requires continuous grass-roots organizing campaign with large number of volunteers. ECFiber has been able to sustain this because of dire need – many parts of many towns, today, are still on dial-up or poor DSL. WHEN ALL ELSE FAILED – THE ECFIBER SOLUTION PROJECT DEVELOPMENT POLICIES AVOID MAJOR ROADS – “GO WHERE THEY AIN’T” TO ASSURE GOOD TAKE RATES [incumbents present in town centers but not in hinterland] ECF GOVERNING BOARD SAID “NO PAY TO PLAY” – [wealthy residents who sought to finance their own road had to organize neighbors to assure adequate take rate] NO GUARANTEE OF IMMEDIATE SERVICE FOR LENDERS – best efforts only [able to satisfy about 85% of lenders] LESSONS LOCAL DEMAND MUST BE WELL-ESTABLISHED LOCAL SECURITIES LAWS MUST BE WELL-RESEARCHED START-UP FUNDING MUST BE SUFFICIENT TO COVER LEGAL COSTS AS WELL AS INITIAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION BUSINESS MODEL MUST BE THOROUGHLY DEVELOPED TO ASSURE PAY-BACK OF INTEREST RATES COMMENSURATE WITH RISK CAN THIS MODEL BE REPLICATED? B4RN: BROADBAND FOR THE RURAL NORTH is using a similar model in Lancashire, UK B4RN RESULTS HAVE BEEN MUCH THE SAME AS ECFIBER’S THE PATH FORWARD 3 ½ years after connecting it’s first customer, and having achieved a stable revenue stream, positive EBITDA, and accumulated three years of audited financial statements, ECFiber is preparing to return to private municipal debt market for sufficient funds to enable complete network build-out over next 5-7 years. COMMUNITY-BASED FUNDING IS LIKELY TO BE MAINTAINED AS PART OF THE MIX MAY THE FORCE BE WITH US! ? YOUR QUESTIONS ?