EVIDENCE PRIMER 2008 PROFESSOR KING I. Dealing with Witnesses PREPARE YOUR WITNESSES!! Direct Examination Keep it simple Tell a story Do not lead Focus on the witness Use exhibits, if helpful Prepare the witness Listen to the witness Cross-Examination Be brief Be organized Be consistent Be deliberate Be fresh Be in control Be brief Impeachment Point: Discredit the Witness’s Testimony o Perception o Memory o Communication o Sincerity Ways to Impeach o Bias, interest, or motive o Prior convictions or prior bad acts o Prior inconsistent statements o Contradictory facts Impeaching with a Document o Have document marked o Show opposing counsel o Ask permission to approach o Spank the puppy Nuts and Bolts: L-D-A-I Refreshing Recollection II. Dealing with Exhibits So you have an exhibit… let’s get it admitted into evidence. Mark the exhibit Show the exhibit to opposing counsel Ask to approach the witness Show the exhibit to the witness Lay the foundation for admission Offer the exhibit into evidence Get exhibit into evidence Have witness use exhibit Publish the exhibit L: I am showing you what I have marked for identification as defense exhibit 14. What is that? W: That is a photograph of the corner of Jackson Avenue and White Street. L: Have you ever been to the corner of Jackson Avenue and White Street? W: Yes. I have walked past that intersection on my way to work every morning for the past 5 years. L: Are you familiar with the way that intersection looked on September 25, 2008? W: Yes. L: Does defense exhibit 14 fairly and accurately reflect that intersection as it appeared on September 25, 2008? W: Yes, it does. L: I offer defense exhibit 14 into evidence. J: Any objections? Hearing none, defense exhibit 14 is admitted. L: Could you please show the jury on defense exhibit 14 any stop signs? W: There is a stop sign right here (pointing) on White Street. L: Judge, could I publish defense exhibit 14 to the jury at this time? III. Dealing with Objections Some Common Objections, and How to Deal With Them: IV. Relevance More Prejudicial than Probative Privilege Hearsay Calls for an Opinion Asked and Answered Best Evidence Rule Misstates the Evidence Non-Responsive (move to strike) Beyond the Scope Form of the Question o Leading o Calls for a Narrative Response o Argumentative o Compound question o Improper Foundation The Rule Against Hearsay and Exceptions to the Rule Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered for the truth of the matter asserted. What is not hearsay? Any statement not offered for the truth of the matter asserted Admission by a party-opponent Prior inconsistent statement of a testifying witness, given under oath Prior consistent statement of a testifying witness, only to rebut charge of recent fabrication Statements of prior identification What is hearsay but still admissible? Present sense impression Excited utterance Then-existing mental, emotional, or physical condition Statements for purposes of medical treatment Past recollection recorded Business records Public records Dying declarations Statements against interest