UNIVERSITY OF KENT
MODULE SPECIFICATION TEMPLATE
SECTION 1: MODULE SPECIFICATIONS
1.
Title of the module
IT Systems Analysis and Design
2.
School or partner institution which will be responsible for management of the module
Kent Business School
3.
Start date of the module
September 2014
4.
The number of students expected to take the module
15
5.
Modules to be withdrawn on the introduction of this proposed module and consultation with
other relevant Schools and Faculties regarding the withdrawal
None
6.
The level of the module (e.g. Certificate [C], Intermediate [I], Honours [H] or Postgraduate [M])
Intermediate (I)
7.
The number of credits and the ECTS value which the module represents
15 credits (7.5 ECTs)
8.
Which term(s) the module is to be taught in (or other teaching pattern)
Autumn & Spring
9.
Prerequisite and co-requisite modules
None
10. The programmes of study to which the module contributes
HND Business (Digital Business)
11. The intended subject specific learning outcomes
11.1
Develop a critical understanding of different systems life cycles
11.2
Critically evaluate the importance of a feasibility study
11.3
Knowledge and critical understanding of the tools and techniques for systems analysis
11.4
Be able to perform a systems investigation
12. The intended generic learning outcomes
12.1
A conceptual understanding that enables the student to solve problems
12.2
Ability to Critically analyse information and utilise the results of that analysis
12.3
Ability to apply underlying concepts and principles
1
UNIVERSITY OF KENT
12.4
Quantitative skills
13. A synopsis of the curriculum
The Indicative content will include topics such as:













Systems analysis investigations including recognised methodologies for Systems analysis
investigations
Systems life cycles models eg Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC), Rapid Applications
Design (RAD), Spiral, Agile, Dynamic Systems Design Methodology (DSDM), Waterfall and
Prototyping
Lifecycle stages within different models
Frameworks for capturing data and information
Feasibility studies and the use of recognised fact-finding techniques.
Stakeholder interests
The wider implications of any development
Strengths and weaknesses of different life cycle models including situations in which they are
most appropriate.
Systems investigations
Tools and techniques for systems analysis
Issues with the control of big IT projects
14. Indicative Reading List
Curtis G, Cobham D (2008) Business Information Systems: Analysis, Design and Practice London:
Financial Times/Prentice Hall
Dennis A and Haley Wixom B (2009) Systems Analysis and Design Bognor Regis:John Wiley & Sons
Hoffer J, George J, Valacich J (2013) Modern System Analysis and Design London:Pearson
Langer A (2007) Analysis and Design of Information Systems 3rd edition 2008, Springer
Lejk M and Deeks D (2002) An Introduction to System Analysis Techniques, 2nd Edition New
York:Addison Wesley
Canterbury College E Books
Poirier C, Walker I (2005) Business Process Management Applied: Creating the Value Managed
Enterprise USA:J Ross Publishing E-Book
Price R, (2005) Eye for Innovation: Recognizing Possibilities and Managing the Creative Enterprise
USA:Yale University Press E-Book
Websites
www.freetutes.com/systemanalysis/
15. Learning and Teaching Methods, including the nature and number of contact hours and the
total study hours which will be expected of students, and how these relate to achievement of
the intended module learning outcomes
This module will be delivered over 15 or 30 weeks
Hours
Subject LOs
Generic LOs
Lectures
21.5
11.1, 11.2, 11.3, 11.4
12.1, 12.2, 12.3, 12.4.
Seminars
21.5
11.1, 11.2, 11.3, 11.4
12.1, 12.2, 12.3, 12.4.
2
11.1, 11.2, 11.3, 11.4
12.1, 12.2, 12.3, 12.4.
Independent study
105
11.1, 11.2, 11.3, 11.4
12.1, 12.2, 12.3, 12.4.
Total hours
150
Workshops
2
UNIVERSITY OF KENT
Comments: All of the learning opportunities contained in this module are designed to enable the
students to achieve the subject specific and generic learning outcomes.
Lecture: A didactic or student centred oral presentation, delivered to or with a group of students.
Seminar: A student led discussion.
Workshop: A workplace derived problem resolution learning session
16. Assessment methods and how these relate to testing achievement of the intended module
learning outcomes
Written Essay
Weighting
Subject LOs
Generic LOs
50%
11.1,
12.1, 12.2, 12.4.
Students will complete an individual written assignment of 2,500 words requiring them to critically
discuss systems life cycles
Project Report
50%
11. 2, 11.3 11.4.
12.1, 12.2, 12.3, 12.4
Students will complete a systems analysis, feasibility study and systems investigation which will
be recorded in a written project report of 2,500 words.
17. Implications for learning resources, including staff, library, IT and space
No additional resources are required to deliver this programme.
18. The Collaborative Partner recognises and has embedded the expectations of current disability
equality legislation, and supports students with a declared disability or special educational need in its
teaching. Within this module we will make reasonable adjustments wherever necessary, including
additional or substitute materials, teaching modes or assessment methods for students who have
declared and discussed their learning support needs. Arrangements for students with declared
disabilities will be made on an individual basis, in consultation with the Collaborative Partner’s
disability/dyslexia support service, and specialist support will be provided where needed.
19. Campus(es) where module will be delivered: Canterbury College
If the module is part of a programme in a Partner College or Validated Institution, please complete
the following:
20. Partner College/Validated Institution: Canterbury College
21. University School responsible for the programme: Kent Business School
SECTION 2: MODULE IS PART OF A PROGRAMME OF STUDY IN A UNIVERSITY SCHOOL
Statement by the School Director of Learning and Teaching/School Director of Graduate Studies
(as appropriate): "I confirm I have been consulted on the above module proposal and have given advice
on the correct procedures and required content of module proposals"
................................................................
..............................................
Director of Learning and Teaching/Director of
Graduate Studies (delete as applicable)
Date
…………………………………………………
Print Name
3
UNIVERSITY OF KENT
Statement by the Head of School: "I confirm that the School has approved the introduction of the
module and, where the module is proposed by School staff, will be responsible for its resourcing"
.................................................................
..............................................
Head of School
Date
…………………………………………………….
Print Name
SECTION 3: MODULE IS PART OF A PROGRAMME IN A PARTNER COLLEGE OR VALIDATED
INSTITUTION
(Where the module is proposed by a Partner College/Validated Institution)
Statement by the Nominated Officer of the College/Validated Institution: "I confirm that the College
has approved the introduction of the module and will be responsible for its resourcing"
Date
Nominated Responsible Officer of Partner College
Print Name
Post
Partner College
Module Specification Template
Last updated February 2013
4