American Politics: Courts January 7, 2008 Announcements Take home essay to be distributed tomorrow, 8 January; due 10 January. Take home essay will be posted at noon tomorrow on my website: www.jkarp.com/f2007/. Essays will also be distributed via email to your university address. Please note: It is YOUR responsibility to obtain the exam. The Nomination Process Iowa Caucus (3 Jan) Barack Obama wins the Democratic caucus; Mike Huckabee wins the Republican caucus New Hampshire Primary (tomorrow, 8 Jan) Obama and McCain lead; Obama has a 13% lead over Clinton and McCain leads by 7% over Romney (USA Today/Gallup) The Courts—The Third Branch Powerful, but not Democratic Supreme Court has nine unelected judges appointed for life and are independent from one another Responsive? Accountable? Power of the Supreme Court Originally intended to interpret the constitution Principal of Judicial Review Allows the SC to declare the acts of president and Congress unconstitutional Role of the Court in Civil Rights and Bush v. Gore Limitations on power Courts are reactive (can only hear cases brought before them) Lack of enforcement Limited by the ability of Congress and the president to write new laws (or constitutional amendments) Public opinion The Structure of the Federal Judiciary Only the Supreme Court is explicitly mentioned in the Constitution (Article III). Nature of the judiciary beyond the Supreme Court deferred to Congress. Judiciary Act of 1789 - created the federal judiciary. The federal judiciary is organized as a threelayered pyramid. The Supreme Court The Supreme Court is the court of final appeal. Under its appellate jurisdiction, the Court may hear cases appealed from the lower courts or directly from the highest state courts when an important constitutional question is in dispute. Decision on which cases to accept is based on the Rule of Four. Supreme Court’s Case Load In a few rare situations the SC has original jurisdiction (meaning it is the first to hear the case). Example: disputes between states Another unusual route is certification, when an appeals court requests a review to settle a question of law. The majority of cases are appeals (via the Court of Appeals). Deciding Cases English Common law Principal of stare decisis (precedent) Judicial restraint vs. judicial activism Reasoning Majority opinions Concurring opinions The Court majority sends a signal to lower courts, lawyers, potential litigants and others how they are likely to treat similar cases in the future. Agrees with decision but not reasoning Dissenting opinions Explains why they disagreed with the ruling. Dissents can be important as they lay the groundwork for future decisions. Checks on the Judiciary Executive Checks Legislative Checks Appropriation of funds Constitutional amendments Amending laws to overturn court’s rulings Public Opinion Appointments Influence judicial opinions enforcement The Court stare decisis Judicial restraint Civil Liberties We classify as civil liberties the Constitution’s protections from government power. Freedom of speech, religion and the right to privacy are examples. Typically violations of these liberties occur when some government agency, at any level, oversteps its authority. Who protects civil liberties? Does the constitution guarantee certain absolute civil liberties? Truth is that our interpretations of these freedoms constantly change. Question of how to balance individual liberties with societal rights Cases Involving Civil Liberties Free Speech, Schenck v. United States (1919) Freedom of Press, New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) Three part test for judging constitutionality of division between church and state Gun Control, United States v. Miller (1939) Court attempts to define obscenity Establishment Clause, Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) Libel violates 1st Amendment Obscenity, Roth v. United States (1957) clear and present danger 2nd Amendment does not provide for absolute guarantee Right to Privacy, Roe v. Wade (1973) Landmark case on abortion The Patriot Act – A Threat to Civil Liberties? Change in protections from unreasonable search and seizure Detention of non-citizens, immigrants Racial profiling Bush v. Gore (2000) Supreme Court decides the 2000 Presidential Election By a vote of 7-2, the Court held that the Florida Supreme Court's scheme for recounting ballots was unconstitutional, and by a vote of 5-4, the Court held that no alternative scheme could be established within the time limits established by Florida Legislature Equal Protection of the laws (14th Amendment): The state-wide standard (that a "legal vote" is "one in which there is a 'clear indication of the intent of the voter.'"could not guarantee that each county would count the votes the same way.