Solid Earth Geophysics-KFUPM Solid Earth Geophysics Today’s class: Earthquake Mechanism Reading: Fowler Chapter 4 Ali Oncel oncel@kfupm.edu.sa Department of Earth Sciences KFUPM Fault Model: Summing Subevents Ms 7.5 on Motagua fault, transform segment of Caribbean-North American plate boundary caused enormous damage and 22,000 deaths. 1976 Guatemala Earthquake Source: Stein, 2003 Land shift Motagua, Guatemala February 4, 1976 Magnitude 7.5 Photo Credit: U.S. Geological Survey Building Digital Solid Earth atlas.geo.cornell.edu Interactive Mapping Focal Mechanism: the Interactive Database Select your area by cursor Then, click on button “submit” Then, click on “Show Data Set” From Geophysics, select “CMT Focal Mechanism” Then, Click on “Submit Data Set” Focal Mechanism Map Download the map under different options. JPG is easy to download but *.PS is good if making up for picture is needed. Then, just click the option “JPG”, and see the regional map of focal mechanisms. World-wide Data Search Search Data for area of your term project from the below site and try to make a 3D map of Focal Mechanism Using the Software “ArcScene” above by USGS. http://neic.usgs.gov/ne is/sopar/ http://pubs.usgs.gov/d s/2007/241/ 3D Focal Mechanisms Data Search: Example for Marmara http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/2007/241/ Region (38-42N, 26-31 E) Homework due May 23 Through the Interactive Data Module which is explained so far http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/sopar/ Prepare the 3D focal mechanism map of the Marmara Area using the software: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/2007/241/ Also, try to provide a discussion about one paragraph: Mechanism of Faulting a) Direction of Regional Stress Nuclear Explosions An underground nuclear test can cause earth shaking like an M5 earthquake. A lot of effort has gone into trying to being able to determine whether ground shaking is caused by a natural earthquake or a nuclear explosion. Establishment of the World Wide Seismic Network in the 1960s was actually funded based on the need to monitor bombs, not study earthquakes. Earthquake or Bomb? How can we tell? Nuclear Bomb: Compressional Source. P wave first motion in all directions. Slip on a fault: P wave first motion compressional and extensional. Radiation patterns for Bomb and Earthquake are totally different due to differences in their sources as: Compressional and Shear. From: Vince Cronin Bomb Data recorded at Nilore, Pakistan. Nuclear tests are shallower than most earthquakes. Earthquake Nuclear tests generally have weaker surface waves and stronger P wave arrivals. Source: https://www.llnl.gov/str/Zucca.html Nuclear explosions vs. Earthquakes Physics are different Explosions are compressional sources Generates strong P-waves, little shear energy (S-waves, Surface waves) Earthquakes are shear sources Generate all wave types, but dependent on radiation pattern Empirical methods are preferred for monitoring Easy to implement Quick (no heavy computations) Must be able to record and understand “regional” recordings Waves that travel through crust are much more complex than those traveling through body of the earth (mantle) Source: Aaron A. Velasco, SACNAS, 2005. Forensic Seismology Raw Data Filtered Data Magnitude-Energy Mag.-Energy Plot Source Source: Murphy, 1996 Mag.-Energy Relation Forensic Seismology Results Event locates to North Korea Event has strong Rg waves, implies shallow source Events has high ratio of P/S, implies explosion First motions up, implies explosion Assuming an explosion, the magnitude (4.2 mb) indicates a yield of about 1 ~ kt Russian Earthquake Explosion Detonated on August 29, 1949, it had a yield of 22 kilotons. Detonated on August 12, 1953, it had a yield of 400 kilotons. Detonated on September 14, 1954, it had a yield of 40 kilotons. Source: http://www.atomicforum.org/russia/russiantesting.html Magnitude as a discriminator http://www.geoscienceworld.org/ Asperity Hazard Model MAGNITUDE DISTRIBUTION " " within the northern Marmara Sea region. 4 log N 3 b-value 2 1 0 23-31°E 0 2 4 6 8 MAGNITUDE Log N = a – b M b-value : Material heterogeneity Applied shear stress level Thermal gradient Fault complexity Oncel and Wyss, 2000 TL(M) = dT/10 (a-bM)