Bridge Engineering Lecture 1 A

advertisement

Bridge Engineering

Lecture 1 A

Planning of Bridges

Dr. Shahzad Rahman

Bridge Planning

• Traffic Studies

• Hydrotechnical Studies

• Geotechnical Studies

• Environmental Considerations

• Alternatives for Bridge Type

• Economic Feasibility

• Bridge Selection and Detailed Design

Existing Network

Traffic Studies

New Road Link

City Center

New Bridge

Traffic Studies

• Traffic studies need to be carried out to ascertain the amount of traffic that will utilize the New or Widened Bridge

• This is needed to determine Economic

Feasibility of the Bridge

• For this Services of a Transportation

Planner and or Traffic Engineer are

Required

• Such Studies are done with help of Traffic

Software such as TransCAD, EMME2 etc.

Traffic Studies

• Traffic Studies should provide following information

– Traffic on Bridge immediately after opening

– Amount of traffic at various times during life of the

Bridge

– Traffic Mix i.e. number of motorcars, buses, heavy trucks and other vehicles

– Effect of the new link on existing road network

– Predominant Origin and Destination of traffic that will use the Bridge

– Strategic importance of the new/improved Bridge

Hydrotechnical Studies

• A thorough understanding of the river and river regime is crucial to planning of Bridge over a river

• Hydrotechnical Studies should include:

• Topographic Survey 2km upstream and

2km downstream for small rivers including

Longitudinal section and X-sections

• For big rivers 5kms U/S and 2kms D/S should be surveyed

• Navigational Requirements

Hydrotechnical Studies

• Scale of the topographic map

– 1:2000 for small rivers

– 1:5000 for large rivers

• The High Flood Levels and the

Observed Flood Level should be indicated map

• Sufficient Number of x-sections should be taken and HFL and

OFL marked on them

• River Bed surveying would require soundings

Hydrotechnical Studies

• Catchment Area Map

• Scale recommended

– 1:50,000 or

– 1:25,000

• Map can be made using GT Sheets available from Survey of Pakistan

• All Reservoirs, Rain

Gauges Stns., River

Gauge Stns., should be marked on map

Catchment of River Indus

Hydrotechnical Studies

River Catchment Area

Hydrotechnical Studies

River Catchment Boundaries with Tributaries

Hydrotechnical Studies

River Catchment Boundaries with Sub-Basin Boundaries

Hydrological Data

• Following Hydrological Data should be collected:

• Rainfall Data from Rain Gauge Stations in the Catchment Area

• Isohyetal Map of the Catchment Area showing contours of Annual Rainfall

• Hydrographs of Floods at River Gauge

Stations

• Flow Velocities

• Sediment Load in River Flow during floods

Hydrologic Data

Example of an ISOHYETAL MAP

Hydrologic Data

Example of River Hydrograph

Hydrologic Data

Example of a River Hydrograph

Design Flood Levels

• AASHTO Gives Following Guidelines for Estimating

Design Flood Levels

Design Flood Levels

• AASHTO Gives Following Guidelines for Estimating

Design Flood Levels

Design Flood Levels

• CANADIAN MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION

Gives Following Guidelines for Estimating Design Flood Levels

Design Flood Levels

• CANADIAN MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION

Gives Following Guidelines for Estimating Design Flood Levels

Design Flood Levels

FREEBOARD REQUIREMENTS

• CANADIAN MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION

Gives Following Guidelines for Estimating Freeboard Requirements

Estimating Design Flood

• Flood Peak Discharge at Stream or River Location

Depends upon:

• Catchment Area Characteristics

– Size and shape of catchment area

– Nature of catchment soil and vegetation

– Elevation differences in catchment and between catchment and bridge site location

• Rainfall Climatic Characteristics

– Rainfall intensity duration and its spatial distribution

• Stream/River Characteristics

– Slope of the river

– Baseline flow in the river

– River Regulation Facilities/ Dams, Barrages on the river

Methods of Estimating Design Flood

1. Empirical Methods

2. Flood Frequency Analysis

3. Rational Method

Empirical Methods of Peak Flood Estimation

• Empirical Formulae have been determined that relate Catchment Area and other weather or river parameters to Peak Flood Discharge

• Popular Formulae for Indo-Pak are:

– Dickens Formula

Q

825 A

3 / 4

Q = Discharge in Cusecs

A = Catchment Area in Sq. Miles

– Inglis Formula

– Ryve’s Formula

Q

7000

A

4

A

Q

C A

2 / 3

C = 450 for areas within 15 miles off coast

560 between 15 – 100 miles off coast

Flood Frequency Analysis Method

• Usable at gauged sites where river discharge data is available for sufficient time in past

• Following Methods are commonly used

– Normal Distribution Method

– Log-Normal Distribution

– Log-Plot Graphical Method

Flood Frequency Analysis Method

• Normal Distribution Method

– Based on Assumption that events follow the shape of Standard Normal Distribution Curve

Normal Distribution Method

Q

P

Q

M

K

Tr

Q

Q

Q

P

= Discharge Associated with Probability of Occurrence P

QM = Mean Discharge over the data set

σQ = Standard Deviation of the Discharge data set

KTr = Frequency factor corresponding to Probability of Occurrence P

Example of Peak Flood Estimation Flood

Example

Flood Frequency Analysis Normal Distribution Method

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

Actual

Year Year Max Flood Xi - Xavg (Xi - Xavg)

2

(No.) Q

(cumecs) (cumecs) (cumecs

2

)

7

8

5

6

3

4

1

2

9

10

11

12

16

32

48

14

26

42

17

35

13

21

18

16

2.9

18.9

-6.1

11.9

-7.1

8.9

24.9

-9.1

-10.1

-2.1

-5.1

-7.1

8.3

356.3

37.5

141.0

50.8

78.8

618.8

83.3

102.5

4.5

26.3

50.8

Ranked Flow

(Decending

Order)

35

32

26

25

48

45

42

35

23

21

21

20

Rank Probability Return Period

R P = R/n Tr = 1/P

7

8

5

6

3

4

1

2

9

10

11

12

0.04

0.08

0.13

0.17

0.21

0.25

0.29

0.33

0.38

0.42

0.46

0.50

(yrs)

24.00

12.00

8.00

6.00

4.80

4.00

3.43

3.00

2.67

2.40

2.18

2.00

Example of Peak Flood Estimation Flood

Actual

Year

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

13

14

15

16

17

Year

(No.)

Max Flood Xi - Xavg (Xi - Xavg)

2

Q

(cumecs) (cumecs) (cumecs

2

)

14

12

17

25

15

21

15

20

15

35

45

23

-3.1

-8.1

11.9

21.9

-0.1

-9.1

-11.1

-6.1

1.9

-8.1

-2.1

-8.1

9.8

66.0

141.0

478.5

0.0

83.3

123.8

37.5

3.5

66.0

4.5

66.0

Ranked Flow

(Decending

Order)

15

15

15

14

14

13

12

18

17

17

16

16

Rank Probability Return Period

R P = R/n Tr = 1/P

(yrs)

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

13

14

15

16

17

0.54

0.58

0.63

0.67

0.71

0.75

0.79

0.83

0.88

0.92

0.96

1.00

1.85

1.71

1.60

1.50

1.41

1.33

1.26

1.20

1.14

1.09

1.04

1.00

Sample Pts = n =

Mean Qm = M

Sum of Squares =

Variance =

S 2 

24

23.125

n

1

1

( x j

 x ) 2 

V

( n

S

2

1 )

Standard Deviation =  

V

Coefficient of Variation = Cv = σ/M =

Skewness Coefficient = SC = 3 Cv + Cv

3

=

Input Return Period (Years) = Tr =

Probability = p = 1/ Tr

Flood Estimate = Qt =

2638.6

114.72

10.71

0 . 4 6 3

1.49

100 Input Value

0.01

Example of Peak Flood Estimation Flood

Input Return Period (Years) = Tr =

Probability = p = 1/ Tr

Flood Estimate = Qt =

100 Input Value

0.01

w

 ln p

1

2 w = 3.03485528

K

Tr

 w

2 .

51557

1

1 .

532788

0 .

802853 w

0 .

w

189269

 w

0 .

010328

2 

0 .

w

2

001308 w

3

K

Tr

=

Flood Estimate = Qt =

Q t

 Q m

Ktr

2.32678649

Qt = 48.05

Cumecs

10

1

1 10

Series1

Log. (Series1)

100

Log-Normal Distribution Method

• Yields better Results

Compared to Normal

Distribution Method ln Q

P

 ln Q

M

K

Tr

 ln Q

Log Q or Ln Q lnQ

P lnQ

M

σ lnQ

K

Tr

Q

P

= Log of Discharge Associated with Probability of Occurrence P

= Mean of Log Discharge over the data set

= Standard Deviation of the Log of Discharge data set

= Frequency factor corresponding to Probability of Occurrence P

= Antilog (ln Q

P

) = Discharge Associated with Probability of Occurrence P

Example of Peak Flood Estimation Flood

Log-Plot Method

Log Plot Discharge Vs Return Period

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

Observed Discharge

Log. (Observed Discharge) y = 12.724Ln(x) + 11.733

10

0

1 10

Retun Period (Yrs)

Trendline Equation is

Qt = 12.724 Ln(Tr) + 11.213

For Return Period Tr =

Qt = 12.724 Ln (50) + 11.213 =

For Return Period Tr =

Qt = 12.724 Ln (100) + 11.213 =

50 yrs

100 yrs

61.0

69.8

cumecs cumecs

100

Rational Method of Peak Flood Estimation

• Attempts to give estimate of Design Discharge taking into account:

– The Catchment Characteristics

– Rainfall Intensity

– Discharge Characteristics of the Catchment

Q

C I

T

A

Q = Design Discharge

I

T

= Average rainfall intensity (in/hr) for some recurrence interval, T during that period of time equal to Tc.

Tc = Time of Concentration

A = Area of the catchment in Sq. miles

C = Runoff coefficient; fraction of runoff, expressed as a dimensionless decimal fraction, that appears as surface runoff from the contributing drainage area.

Rational Method of Peak Flood Estimation

• Time of Concentration can be estimated using

Barnsby Williams Formula which is widely used by US Highway Engineers

Tc

0 .

9 L

A

0 .

1

S

0 .

2

L = Length of Stream in Miles

A = Area of the catchment in Sq. miles

S = Average grade from source to site in percent

Rational Formula – Runoff Coefficient

Area Characteristic

Steep Bare Rock

Steep Rock with Woods

Plateau with light cover

Densely built-up areas

Residential areas

Stiff Clayey soils

Loam

Suburbs with gardens

Sandy soils

Jungle area

Parks, Lawns, Fields

Run-off Coefficient C

0.90

0.80

0.70

0.90 – 0.70

0.70 – 0.50

0.50

0.40 – 0.30

0.30

0.1 – 0.20

0.10 – 0.25

0.25 - 0.50

Geotechnical Studies

• Geotechnical Studies should provide the following Information:

• The types of Rocks, Dips, Faults and

Fissures

• Subsoil Ground Water Level, Quality,

Artesian Conditions if any

• Location and extent of soft layers

• Identification of hard bearing strata

• Physical properties of soil layers

Geotechnical Studies

Example Geological Profile:

Cross section of the soil on the route of the Paris

The diagram above shows the crossing over the Seine via the Bir Hakeim bridge and the limestone quarries under Trocadéro

Geotechnical Studies

Example: Cross section of the Kansas River, west of Silver Lake, Kansas

Typical Borehole

Seismic Considerations

Source: Building Code of Pakistan

Tectonic Setting of the Bridge Site

Source: Geological Survey of Pakistan

Environmental Considerations

• Impact on Following Features of Environment need to considered:

– River Ecology which includes:

• Marine Life

• Wildlife along river banks

• Riverbed

• Flora and fauna along river banks

– Impact upon dwellings along the river if any

– Impact upon urban environment if the bridge in an urban area

– Possible impact upon archeological sites in vicinity

Bridge Economic Feasibility

• Economic Analysis is Required at

Feasibility Stage to justify expenditure of public or private funds

• A Bridge is the most expensive part of a road transportation network

• Types of Economic Analyses

– Cost Benefit Ratio Analysis

– Internal Rate of Return (IRR) Analysis

Bridge Economic Analysis/

Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA)

Time

Project Life

Project Cost Benefit Analysis

• The objective of LCCA is to

– Estimate the costs associated with the Project during Construction an its service life. These include routine maintenance costs +

Major Rehab Costs

– Estimate the Benefits that will accrue from the Project including time savings to road users, benefits to business activities etc.

– Bring down the costs and benefits to a common reference pt. in time i.e. just prior to start of project (decision making time)

– Facilitate decision making about economic feasibility by calculating quantifiable yardsticks such as Benefit to Cost Ratio

(BCR) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

• Note: Salvage Value may be taken as a Benefit

This includes cost of the Right-of-Way and substructure

What is Life Cycle Cost?

• An economic analysis procedure that uses engineering inputs

• Compares competing alternatives considering all significant costs

• Expresses results in equivalent dollars

(present worth)

Time Period of Analysis

• Normally equal for all alternatives

• Should include at least one major rehabilitation

• Needed to capture the true economic benefit of each alternative

• Bridge design today is based on a probabilistic model of 100 years

Bridge Economic Analysis/

Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA)

Time

Problem:

Project Life

• Costs and Benefits Change over the life of the Project

• Amount of Money/Benefit accrued some time in future is worth less in terms of Today’s money

• Same is the case with the benefits accrued over time

• The Problem now is as to How to find the Worth of a Financial Amount in

Future in terms of Today’s Money

• This is accomplished by using the instrument of “DISCOUNT RATE”

Bridge Economic Analysis/

Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA)

DISCOUNT RATE:

The annual effective discount rate is the annual interest divided by the capital including that interest, which is the interest rate divided by 100% plus the interest rate. It is the annual discount factor to be applied to the future cash flow, to find the discount, subtracted from a future value to find the value one year earlier.

For example, suppose there is an investment made of $95 and pays $100 in a year's time. The discount rate according the given definition is:

Discount Rate

 d

100

100

95

5 .

0 %

Interest Rate is calculated as $ 95 as Base

Interest Rate

 i

100

95

95

5 .

26 %

Interest Rate and Discount Rate are Related as Follows

Discount Rate

 d

 i

1

 i

 i

 i

2

Discount Rate

• Thus Discount Rate is that rate which can be used to obtain the Present Value of Money that is spent or collected in future

Cost/ Benefit Projected

Backward

Cn

Year n

Co

Time

Bo

Bn

Project

Life

Net Present value of Cost incurred = Co = (1 - d) n

Cn

In Year n

Net Present value of Cost incurred = Bo = (1 - d) n

Bn

In Year n

What Discount Rate to Use?

• A first estimate of appropriate Discount rate can be made as follows:

Estimate of

Discount Rate = Federal Bank Lending Rate – Average Long-term Inflation Rate

Note: By subtracting the Inflation Rate in arriving at a Discount Rate the effect of Inflation can be removed from consideration during

Economic Analysis

The Discount Rate after subtracting the Inflation Rate is also

Referred to as the “Real Discount Rate”

Govt. of Pakistan uses a Discount Rate of 6-7% for economic analysis

Asian Development Bank uses a Discount rate of 12% for evaluation of projects

Discount Rate is less than the Real interest Rate as Governments do not take a purely commercial view of an infrastructure project

Cost Considerations

Present Worth

Initial Cost

Rehabilitation Cost

Salvage

Costs

Maintenance and

Inspection

Cost

Years

Salvage

Value

Cost Benefit Ratio

Formula for Cost

Benefit Ratio

Benefit To Cost Ratio =

Present Value of Benefits

Present Value of Costs

L 

0

( 1

 d ) n

L 

0

( 1

 d ) n

Bn

Cn

Where L = Life Span of the Project in Years d = Discount Rate

Bn = Benefit in year n

Cn = Cost incurred in year n

Net Present Worth/ Value

• Net Present Worth/ Value = NPW or NPV is defined as follows:

NPW = NPV = Present Value of Benefits – Present Value of Costs

Note: If a Number of alternatives are being compared, the alternative that has the highest Net Present Worth is the preferable one and will also have the higher Benefit to Cost Ratio

What is Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

• IRR may be defined as that Discount Rate at which the Benefit to Cost Ratio (BCR) of a Project becomes exactly 1.0

• It is a better measure of economic viability of a project compared to Benefit to Cost

Ratio

• It is a good indicator of how much inflation increase and interest rate hike a project can tolerate and still be viable

Present Worth Factor

pwf

( 1

 d ) n pwf = Present Worth Factor for discount rate d and year n d = Discount rate n = Number of year when the cost/ benefit will occur

Alternate Formula (Usually Adopted) pwf

1

1

 d

 n

Present Worth Analysis

• Discounts all future costs and benefits to the present:

PW = FC + t=L

 pwf [MC+IC+FRC+UC] + pwf [S] t=0

PW = Present Worth/ Value of the Project t

FC = First (Initial) Cost

= Time Period of Analysis (ranges from 0

L)

MC = Maintenance Costs

IC = Inspection Costs

FRC = Future Rehabilitation Costs

UC = Users Costs

S = Salvage Values or Costs pwf = Present Worth Factor

Time Period of Analysis

• Normally equal for all alternatives

• Should include at least one major rehabilitation

– Needed to capture the true economic benefit of each alternative

• Bridge design today is based on a probabilistic model of

100 years

Maintenance Costs

• Annual cost associated with the upkeep of the structure

• Information is difficult to obtain for a given project

• Cost varies on the basis of size of the structure

(sqft)

• Best Guess Values

– Frequency - Annual

– Concrete 0.05 % of Initial Cost

– Structural Steel 0.05 % of Initial Cost

Inspection Costs

• Should be taken for all alternatives preferably every two years

• Cost varies on the basis of size of the structure

(sqft) and by construction material

• Best Guess Values

– Frequency - Biannual

– Concrete 0.15 % of Initial Cost

– Structural Steel 0.20 % of Initial Cost

Future Painting Costs

• Only applies to structural steel structures but excludes weathering steel

• Should occur every 20 years

• Cost varies on the basis of size of the structure

(sqft)

• Best Guess Values

– Frequency – every 20 years

– Concrete 0.0 % of Initial Cost

– Structural Steel 7.0 % of Initial Cost

Future Rehabilitation Costs

• The frequency is not only a function of time but also the growing traffic volume and the structural beam system

• Cost varies on the basis of size of the structure (sqft) and structural beam system

• Best Guess Values

– Frequency

• First occurrence – Concrete 40 years

• First occurrence – Structural Steel 35 years

• Annual traffic growth rate .75 % (shortens rehab cycles)

– Concrete

– Structural Steel

20.0 % of Initial Cost

22.0 % of Initial Cost

Salvage Value/Costs

• Occurs once at end of life of structure

• Difference between

– Removal cost

– Salvage value

• Best Guess Values

– Removal cost 10 % of Initial Cost

– Salvage Value – Concrete - 0 % of Initial Cost

– Salvage Value – Structural Steel - 2 % of Initial Cost

Benefits from a Bridge

Monetizable Benefits

• Time savings to road users

• Growth in economic activity

• Saving of Vehicular wear and tear

• Reduction of accidents if applicable

Other Non-Monetizable Benefits

• Strategic Benefits

Example of Economic Analysis

Carry out an Economic Analysis of a Proposed Bridge given the following Data:

= 12,000 Vehicles per Day Estimated Average Annualized Daily Traffic is

With the Following Mix of Traffic

Cars

Trucks

Buses

Assume that the Traffic Growth Rate is Geometric over the

Life Span of the Bridge

Bridge Life Span

The Construction Cost is spread over 2 years

The Trade and economic benefits are estimated to be

Annual Growth Rate of Trade Benefits is Geometric at the rate of over the

Life Span of the Bridge

The Bridge would Result in Time Saving of to Road Users

Average Time Value of Single Road User

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

10,000

1,000

1,000

1.2 %

80 years

200.0 Million Rs.

10.0 Million Rs. per year

2.0 %

1 hour

50.0 Rs. Per Hour

Example of Economic Analysis

Assume that the Bridge would require:

Annual Maintenance

Major Rehabilitation after every 30 years

Salvage Value of Piers and Abutments

Salvage Cost is assumed to be

Average Occupancy Of a Single Car

Average Occupancy Of a Single Truck

Average Occupancy Of a Single Bus

Calculate the Present Worth, Net Present Worth,

Benefit to Cost Ratio of the Bridge at Discount Rate =

Calculate the Internal Rate of Return of the Bridge

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

0.03 % of Construction Cost

20.0 % of Construction Cost

25 % of Construction Cost

0.0 %

3.0 Passengers

2.0 Passengers

50 Passengers

6.0 %

Example of Economic Analysis

Benefits in Time Saving Upon Bridge Opening

Vehicle

Type

Cars

Buses

Trucks

Number Occupancy Time Saving Time Value

10,000

1,000

1,000

(Persons)

3.0

50.0

2.0

Total Benefit Per Year

Assumed to then Grow at Geometrically at the Rate of 1.2% per year

(hrs)

1.0

1.0

1.0

(Rs.per Hour)

=

Benefit

(Rs.)

50.0

1,500,000

50.0

2,500,000

50.0

100,000

4,100,000

Example of Economic Analysis

Actual Year Year No.

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

0

1

4

5

2

3

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

Present Worth

Factor (PWF)

Construction/

Maintenance

Cost

(1-d)^n (Rs.)

1.0000

100,000,000

0.9400

100,000,000

0.8836

0.8306

0.7807

0.7339

0.6899

0.6485

0.6096

0.5730

0.5386

0.5063

0.4759

0.4474

0.4205

0.3953

0.3716

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

Benefit:

Time

Saving Rehab Cost Total Costs

(Rs.) (Rs.)

100,000,000

100,000,000

(Rs.)

-

60,000 4,100,000

60,000 4,149,200

60,000 4,198,400

60,000 4,247,600

60,000 4,296,800

60,000 4,346,000

60,000 4,395,200

60,000 4,444,400

60,000 4,493,600

60,000 4,542,800

60,000 4,592,000

60,000 4,641,200

60,000 4,690,400

60,000 4,739,600

60,000 4,788,800

Benefit:

Trade/

Economic

(Rs.)

10,000,000

10,200,000

10,400,000

10,600,000

10,800,000

11,000,000

11,200,000

11,400,000

11,600,000

11,800,000

12,000,000

12,200,000

12,400,000

12,600,000

12,800,000

Salvage

Benefit

(Rs.)

Total

Benefits

Total

Discounted

Costs

(Rs.) (Rs.)

100,000,000

94,000,000

14,100,000

14,349,200

14,598,400

14,847,600

15,096,800

15,346,000

15,595,200

15,844,400

16,093,600

16,342,800

16,592,000

16,841,200

17,090,400

17,339,600

17,588,800

53,016

49,835

46,845

44,034

41,392

38,909

36,574

34,380

32,317

30,378

28,555

26,842

25,231

23,718

22,294

Total

Discounted

Benefits

(Rs.)

-

-

12,458,760

11,918,216

11,397,686

10,896,713

10,414,826

9,951,537

9,506,350

9,078,759

8,668,256

8,274,330

7,896,470

7,534,165

7,186,910

6,854,202

6,535,546

Net Benefit

(Rs.)

(100,000,000)

(100,000,000)

14,040,000

14,289,200

14,538,400

14,787,600

15,036,800

15,286,000

15,535,200

15,784,400

16,033,600

16,282,800

16,532,000

16,781,200

17,030,400

17,279,600

17,528,800

Example of Economic Analysis

2047

2048

2049

2050

2051

2052

2053

2054

2055

2056

2057

2058

2059

2060

2037

2038

2039

2040

2041

2042

2043

2044

2045

2046

2027

2028

2029

2030

2031

2032

2033

2034

2035

2036

42

43

44

45

46

37

38

39

40

41

47

48

49

50

32

33

34

35

36

27

28

29

30

31

22

23

24

25

26

17

18

19

20

21

Actual Year Year No.

Present Worth

Factor (PWF)

(1-d)^n

0.1013

0.0952

0.0895

0.0842

0.0791

0.0744

0.0699

0.0657

0.0618

0.0581

0.0546

0.0513

0.0482

0.0453

0.1881

0.1768

0.1662

0.1563

0.1469

0.1381

0.1298

0.1220

0.1147

0.1078

0.3493

0.3283

0.3086

0.2901

0.2727

0.2563

0.2410

0.2265

0.2129

0.2001

Construction/

Maintenance

Cost

(Rs.)

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

Rehab Cost Total Costs

(Rs.) (Rs.)

40,000,000

Benefit:

Time

Saving

(Rs.)

60,000 4,838,000

60,000 4,887,200

60,000 4,936,400

60,000 4,985,600

60,000 5,034,800

60,000 5,084,000

60,000 5,133,200

60,000 5,182,400

60,000 5,231,600

60,000 5,280,800

60,000 5,330,000

60,000 5,379,200

60,000 5,428,400

40,060,000 5,477,600

60,000 5,526,800

60,000 5,576,000

60,000 5,625,200

60,000 5,674,400

60,000 5,723,600

60,000 5,772,800

60,000 5,822,000

60,000 5,871,200

60,000 5,920,400

60,000 5,969,600

60,000 6,018,800

60,000 6,068,000

60,000 6,117,200

60,000 6,166,400

60,000 6,215,600

60,000 6,264,800

60,000 6,314,000

60,000 6,363,200

60,000 6,412,400

60,000 6,461,600

Benefit:

Trade/

Economic

(Rs.)

13,000,000

13,200,000

13,400,000

13,600,000

13,800,000

14,000,000

14,200,000

14,400,000

14,600,000

14,800,000

15,000,000

15,200,000

15,400,000

15,600,000

15,800,000

16,000,000

16,200,000

16,400,000

16,600,000

16,800,000

17,000,000

17,200,000

17,400,000

17,600,000

17,800,000

18,000,000

18,200,000

18,400,000

18,600,000

18,800,000

19,000,000

19,200,000

19,400,000

19,600,000

Salvage

Benefit

(Rs.)

Total

Discounted

Costs

(Rs.)

20,957

19,699

18,517

17,406

16,362

15,380

14,457

13,590

12,775

12,008

11,288

10,610

9,974

6,259,600

8,813

8,284

7,787

7,320

6,881

6,468

6,080

5,715

5,372

5,050

4,747

4,462

4,194

3,943

3,706

3,484

3,275

3,078

2,893

2,720

Total

Benefits

(Rs.)

17,838,000

18,087,200

18,336,400

18,585,600

18,834,800

19,084,000

19,333,200

19,582,400

19,831,600

20,080,800

20,330,000

20,579,200

20,828,400

21,077,600

21,326,800

21,576,000

21,825,200

22,074,400

22,323,600

22,572,800

22,822,000

23,071,200

23,320,400

23,569,600

23,818,800

24,068,000

24,317,200

24,566,400

24,815,600

25,064,800

25,314,000

25,563,200

25,812,400

26,061,600

Total

Discounted

Benefits

(Rs.)

6,230,454

5,938,445

5,659,047

5,391,799

5,136,247

4,891,952

4,658,482

4,435,416

4,222,349

4,018,882

3,824,630

3,639,221

3,462,292

3,293,493

3,132,486

2,978,943

2,832,549

2,692,997

2,559,995

2,433,258

2,312,514

2,197,499

2,087,961

1,983,656

1,884,351

1,789,822

1,699,853

1,614,236

1,532,774

1,455,276

1,381,560

1,311,451

1,244,782

1,181,391

Net Benefit

(Rs.)

17,778,000

18,027,200

18,276,400

18,525,600

18,774,800

19,024,000

19,273,200

19,522,400

19,771,600

20,020,800

20,270,000

20,519,200

20,768,400

(18,982,400)

21,266,800

21,516,000

21,765,200

22,014,400

22,263,600

22,512,800

22,762,000

23,011,200

23,260,400

23,509,600

23,758,800

24,008,000

24,257,200

24,506,400

24,755,600

25,004,800

25,254,000

25,503,200

25,752,400

26,001,600

Example of Economic Analysis

2082

2083

2084

2085

2086

2087

2088

2089

2074

2075

2076

2077

2078

2079

2080

2081

2090

2091

Total

2061

2062

2063

2064

2065

2066

2067

2068

2069

2070

2071

2072

2073

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

51

52

53

54

55

Actual Year Year No.

Present Worth

Factor (PWF)

Construction/

Maintenance

Cost

(1-d)^n

0.0191

0.0179

0.0168

0.0158

0.0149

0.0140

0.0132

0.0124

0.0116

0.0109

0.0103

0.0097

0.0091

0.0085

0.0080

0.0075

0.0071

0.0067

0.0426

0.0401

0.0377

0.0354

0.0333

0.0313

0.0294

0.0276

0.0260

0.0244

0.0230

0.0216

0.0203

(Rs.)

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

60,000

Benefit:

Time

Saving Rehab Cost Total Costs

(Rs.)

40,000,000

(Rs.) (Rs.)

60,000 6,510,800

60,000 6,560,000

60,000 6,609,200

60,000 6,658,400

60,000 6,707,600

60,000 6,756,800

60,000 6,806,000

60,000 6,855,200

60,000 6,904,400

40,060,000 6,953,600

60,000 7,002,800

60,000 7,052,000

60,000 7,101,200

60,000 7,150,400

60,000 7,199,600

60,000 7,248,800

60,000 7,298,000

60,000 7,347,200

60,000 7,396,400

60,000 7,445,600

60,000 7,494,800

60,000 7,544,000

60,000 7,593,200

60,000 7,642,400

60,000 7,691,600

60,000 7,740,800

60,000 7,790,000

60,000 7,839,200

60,000 7,888,400

60,000 7,937,600

60,000 7,986,800

Benefit:

Trade/

Economic

(Rs.)

19,800,000

20,000,000

20,200,000

20,400,000

20,600,000

20,800,000

21,000,000

21,200,000

21,400,000

21,600,000

21,800,000

22,000,000

22,200,000

22,400,000

22,600,000

22,800,000

23,000,000

23,200,000

23,400,000

23,600,000

23,800,000

24,000,000

24,200,000

24,400,000

24,600,000

24,800,000

25,000,000

25,200,000

25,400,000

25,600,000

25,800,000

Salvage

Benefit

(Rs.)

50,000,000

Total

Benefits

(Rs.)

26,310,800

26,560,000

26,809,200

27,058,400

27,307,600

27,556,800

27,806,000

28,055,200

28,304,400

28,553,600

28,802,800

29,052,000

29,301,200

29,550,400

29,799,600

30,048,800

30,298,000

30,547,200

30,796,400

31,045,600

31,294,800

31,544,000

31,793,200

32,042,400

32,291,600

32,540,800

32,790,000

33,039,200

33,288,400

33,537,600

83,786,800

Total

Discounted

Costs

(Rs.)

2,557

2,403

2,259

2,124

1,996

1,876

1,764

1,658

1,558

978,098

1,377

1,294

1,217

1,144

1,075

1,011

950

893

839

789

742

697

655

616

579

544

512

481

452

425

399

202,104,198

Total

Discounted

Benefits

(Rs.)

1,121,126

1,063,840

1,009,393

957,649

908,480

861,764

817,384

775,227

735,186

697,159

661,049

626,762

594,210

563,308

533,975

506,134

479,712

454,638

430,846

408,272

386,856

366,541

347,270

328,993

311,658

295,220

279,632

264,851

250,838

237,553

557,868

261,516,182

Net Benefit

(Rs.)

26,250,800

26,500,000

26,749,200

26,998,400

27,247,600

27,496,800

27,746,000

27,995,200

28,244,400

(11,506,400)

28,742,800

28,992,000

29,241,200

29,490,400

29,739,600

29,988,800

30,238,000

30,487,200

30,736,400

30,985,600

31,234,800

31,484,000

31,733,200

31,982,400

32,231,600

32,480,800

32,730,000

32,979,200

33,228,400

33,477,600

83,726,800

Total Discounted Costs =

Total Discounted Benefits =

Present Worth =

Net Present Worth =

202,104,198

261,516,182

202,104,198

59,411,984

Rs.

Rs.

Rs.

Rs.

Benefit to Cost Ratio =

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) =

1.294

8.028%

Download