MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility Sustaining High-Performance Lecture 9 ©2000, Michael A. Mische MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Lecture 9: DESCRIPTION & OVERVIEW The need for operational excellence and organizational agility in high-performance and as a source of strategic renewal are well documented. In this session we explore the various aspects of operational excellence and the need for agile and adaptable organizational designs and cultures. This class is designed to provide you with increased perspective and an operating knowledge of: • The definition of operational excellence and agility • The differences between agility, flexibility and speed • The various tools and techniques for creating operational excellence and organizational agility • The impact of the human performance and culture on the ability of an organization to create operational excellence and organizational agility • The role of outsourcing in the achieving operational excellence In addition, we will explore the use of benchmarks and discuss the limitations inherent with relying on “best practices”. KEY LEARNING CONCEPTS There are several important learning concepts and objectives for this class session. First, we discuss the trademarks and characteristics of operational excellence and agility. Second, we review the impact of excellence on organizational and financial performance and develop a basic understanding of principles and concepts of operational excellence and agility. Third, we discuss the organization competencies required to develop and sustain excellence. Fourth, we explore how companies develop operational excellence. Fifth, we discuss the need for the integration of technology, process design and organizational structures as a requisite for operational excellence and organizational agility. Inherent in our discussions will be a review of the concept of value and what it means to “design for value”. Finally, the concepts of designing for adaptability and sustainability are discussed. ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Lecture 9: CLASS SCHEDULE & AGENDA READINGS Mische: Strategic Renewal, Chapter 9 I. II. 6:00 – 6:15 6:15 – 6:30 Course Related Q&A Student Concerns General Discussions Review of previous material Preview of current week’s material III. 6:30 – 7:30 Lecture IV. 7:30 – 7:45 Break V. 7:45 – 9:00 Lecture & Material/ Topic Discussion VI. 8:45 – 9:30 Case Examples & Discussions VII. 9:30 – 10:00 Professor Available for Q&A, Discussion, etc. ©2000, Michael A. Mische Garvin: “Leveraging Processes for Strategic Advantage,” HBR, 95502 The Adams Corporation (HBS) – 9-372-263 Corcoran: “Reinventing Intel,” Forbes, May 3, 1999 Einstein: “Intel: Elephant in a Tutu,” Forbes, April 13, 2000 Einstein: “AMD Shows It’s Ready for Prime Time,” Forbes, April 13, 2000 CASES The Microprocessor Industry: Intel Corporation and AMD (article-built cases) Adams Corporation (HBS case) Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Lecture 9: CONCEPT DISCUSSION & QUESTIONS 1. Discuss the importance of process design in achieving operational excellence. What types of designs are possible and what types of the benefits and weaknesses do they represent? 2. To what extent can operational excellence and organizational agility be facilitated or inhibited by information technology (IT)? Under what conditions could IT be a catalyst for operational excellence and organizational agility? 3. How can an organization use supplier relationships and outsourcers to help it achieve both operational excellence and organizational agility? Consider the implications and also critical success factors of outsourcing and long-term vendor relations. 4. What programs and initiatives can an organization design that will indicate operational excellence in the following areas (discuss some real life cases): • Customer satisfaction and loyalty • Cycle times for problem resolution, order fulfillment, and manufacturing/service delivery • Service and or product quality • • Service and or product quality Employee relations and morale CASE DISCUSSION & QUESTIONS Not specified Interactive class discussion ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Lecture 9: LECTURE SUMMARY Operational excellence is central to creating strategic advantage and can be a catalyst for strategic renewal. High-performance organizations exhibit operational excellence and organizational agility in a number of ways: • Operational excellence is a state in which the organization exists – constantly. • Extend operational excellence to all relevant functions, processes and interactions including those that are external to their organization and especially to those that involve customer interactions, key suppliers, and product/service design and delivery or manufacturing. • Use operational excellence as a catalyst for strategic renewal and change. • Make it a strategic imperative to selectively integrate portions of business designs, technologies and outsourcing partners for leverage and economies of scale. Organizations that successfully establish operational excellence and its compliment, organizational agility, as a strategic pillar will generate significant advantages and better financial results compared to those who fail at such efforts. CLASS & INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENTS ©2000, Michael A. Mische SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL N/A Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California “To grow, our companies have to become much more flexible, much lighter on their feet. You can’t be light on your feet if you’re carrying a lot of baggage.” Christian Koffman, Worldwide Chairman of the Consumer & Personal Care Group, Johnson & Johnson ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility: The Fourth Pillar of Strategic High Performance… Leadership Operational Excellence & Agility Knowledge Innovation Information Technology ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California OE As a High-Value Competency: Five Critical Issues 1. What is the definition of operational excellence relative to high-performance organization? 2. Why is operational excellence important as a strategic pillar? 3. What are the characteristics and qualities of operational excellence? 4. How does an organization create operational excellence? 5. What is the role of organizational agility in operational excellence? ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Operational Excellence Is Defined As… “The design and performance of integrated systems and processes that create superior strategic, competitive and operational value through speed, flexibility and crosspurpose adaptability.” Mische: Strategic Renewal Key Terms SYSTEM ©2000, Michael A. Mische PROCESS Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California System & Process – Definitions SYSTEM… PROCESS… “…is a set of integrated activities supported by related organizations and technologies that are designed to achieve desired outcomes based on predetermined measures. “ “set of interrelated work activities characterized by specific inputs and valueadded tasks that produce specific customer-focused outputs.” V. Sethi & W. King ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Many Factors Influence Operational Excellence… Knowledge Technologies Organizationa l Structure Process Execution Humans PROCESS PERFORMANCE PROCESS OUTCOMES VALUE GENERATED ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California OE: Cases in Point… High-performers achieve operational excellence through an effective design and implementation of their overall business architecture. How did the following companies develop their business architecture and integrated their processes to achieve operational excellence: Chrysler $240 development costs (Sebring) vs. Ford $700 mill (Mustang) Dell 24-hour order shipment Compaq 35 days Gateway 12 days (1999 data) GE 26 days mfg. time (locomotives); considerably better than GM ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Business Architecture for OE OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE MINIMIZE TOTAL TRANSACTION COSTS MAXIMIZE CREATED VALUE OPERATIONS & DECISIONS GREATER SPEED HIGHEST QUALITY MIN. HUMAN INTERVENTION OVERALL BUSINESS ARCHITECTURE KNOWLEDGE ©2000, Michael A. Mische INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY HUMAN PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGY Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Benchmarking in OE: A Critical Element Benchmarking is defined as: “The process of using consistent tools and practices to identify, analyze, measure and contrast the behavior and performance of comparable processes and activities within an organization, a specific industry or across various industries.” Mische: Strategic Renewal Benchmarking communicates 3 important messages: 1. What is possible 2. What others have accomplished 3. What other are doing Three approaches to benchmarking: – Intra-company benchmarks – Intra-industry benchmarks – Cross-industry benchmarks ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Intra-Company Benchmarks Performed within a company on its processes, operations, organizational performance and other functions Compare costs and performance among similar as well as different functions BENEFITS: Easiest to perform Least costly DRAWBACKS: Often biased by internal politics Restricted in design and scope Sometimes incomplete in rationalization of processes ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Intra-Industry Benchmarks Derived from several different companies in the same industry BENEFITS: More diversified More representative that intra-company benchmarks DRAWBACKS: More expensive to perform Require greater effort to rationalize data ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Cross-Industry Benchmarks Include many different companies irrespective of industry and/or processes and operations BENEFITS: Broadest More sophisticated More meaningful Most indicative DRAWBACKS: Most expensive to perform Very complex to analyze and rationalize ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Characteristics Benchmarking: An Overview – Summarized Internal Intra-Industry (External) Benchmark is performed within the organization. Benchmark can be interdivisional, intra-divisional or within a department. Benchmark is performed among a select group of competitors within an industry. Benchmarking is performed across industries using different companies. Easy to perform More complex process Inexpensive Higher investment Extremely complex, requires careful design and execution Confined area of interest, limited insights Provides broader perspective and insight Can be difficult to perform Cross Industry (External) Significant investment Provides more comprehensive perspectives and greater insights Very difficult and expensive to perform Approach to Benchmarking: 7 STEPS Step 1: Determine what to benchmark Step 2: Define benchmarking standards Step 3: Determine benchmarking strategy Step 4: Develop work and staffing plans Step 5: Perform the benchmark Step 6: Analyze results Step 7: Formulate insights ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California The Limitations of Benchmarking 1. At best, benchmarking can lead to a “successful” imitation of competition 2. A company cannot gain a competitive advantage by meeting a benchmark 3. A company cannot achieve a sustainable advantage through benchmarking, because: The external and industry environment is highly dynamic and rapidly changing The “benchmarkee” itself is continuously improving its internal processes and performance 4. Benchmarking itself often fails, because the concept of “best practice” is highly elusive and ill-defined: Poor identification and assessment criteria Poor interpretation Time factor and obsolescence Potential restriction on creativity and innovation ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Creating Operational Excellence The high-performing companies embrace 5 objectives in creating OE at the process level: 1. Designing for Economic and Strategic Value 2. Designing for Multiple Domains 3. Designing for Flawless Execution 4. Designing for Adaptability 5. Designing for Sustainability ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Designing for Economic & Strategic Value In the context of high performance, value is defined as: The creation of tangible economic and operational benefits through: 1) Improved customer attraction and loyalty 2) Increased revenues and profitability 3) Reduced total transaction costs 4) Increased competitive advantage. M.Mische: Strategic Renewal Economic Value Proposition must be developed: – A representation or statement as to what a certain program, project, objective, or action is worth to the consumer, organization and or employee. M.Mische: Strategic Renewal ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Designing for Value, cont’d The design of the process must reflect the following characteristics: 1. Clear alignment and congruency with organizational strategic and operational objectives 2. Distinct cause-and-effect relationship between expected, needed, and produced outcomes 3. Optimization of competencies, resources and organizational capabilities, especially IT, human resources and knowledge 4. Creation of synergies of purpose and leveraging of human and IT performance 5. Appropriate integration of technology 6. Outcome-driven ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Designing for Multiple Domains Designs must be functional and adaptable to a fluid environment Created processes must be: – Adaptable – Scalable – Transportable enterprise-wide as well as to other potential users Three tenets underlie the concept of design for multiple domains: 1. Design/operation of the process can be singular, modular, vertically integrated or externally extended 2. Design/operation of the process should allow for the efficient switching between these multiple forms of process and organizational designs in a cost-effective manner 3. Design/operation of the process should consider the unique aspects and requirements of customers, manufacturing capabilities and collaborative suppliers ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Process Designs and Operations: Overview Singular exist for a highly specialized purpose relatively independent of other processes and organizational competencies little end-customer interactions relatively low value generating activities can be performed by internal resources, external resources, or outsourcing partners examples: product testing for legal or regulatory requirements, financial auditing, etc Modular represent a major sub-system, sub-assembly or significant percentage of an overall process architecture or system typically integrated into an overall process architecture complete sub-systems that are ready to be “plugged into” or readily adapted to an overall larger product or operation the result of internal competencies and collaborative agreements with outsourcing partners, subject matter or specialty providers high customer and competitive value to the organization examples: computer industry (Intel chips, MS software), etc. Vertically Integrated provide essentially for the entire process related human and physical and natural resources are owned and operated by the company executing the process Examples: industrial giants such as GM ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Process Design: The Selection Process & Criteria Three factors affect assessment and selection: 1. Flexibility 2. Cost 3. Longevity Additional considerations include: ©2000, Michael A. Mische Number of available partners Quality requirements Complexity Total transaction costs Cycle times Proprietary nature of involved intellectual capital Brand name exclusivity Switching costs among various alternatives Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California OE & Outsourcing Outsourcing is defined as: “Transferring of all or part of a function, resources, personnel and services to a third-party that provides specialized services that are contractually defined in scope, character and cost for a specified period of time.” Mische: Strategic Renewal Three main reasons for outsourcing: 1. Cost reduction 2. Improving service delivery capabilities 3. Capitalizing on superior external expertise and talent ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Outsourcing Decision-Making Companies must address some key questions regarding outsourcing. Specifically, does it allow to: 1. Support the business direction 2. Represent a good “fit” 3. Reduce costs at sustainable annual target rates 4. Maintain required management controls 5. Retain functional/technical infrastructure flexibility for changing business needs 6. Improve technical competencies and capabilities 7. Mitigate risk and costs ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Outsourcing Processes and Procedures 1. Develop realistic outsourcing objectives and options, given: Existing needs Future needs 2. Use specialized legal services for contracting 3. Consider intellectual property laws and copyrights 4. Examine exit options and cost implications 5. Determine performance measures and monitor performance 6. Establish collaborative partnership with outsourcer ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Approaching Outsourcing PHASE Strategy Alternatives Services PROCESS Budgets PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 Baselining Determine Outsourcing Strategy Develop Outsourcing RFP Evaluate Vendor Alternatives Vision Users Business Plan Requirements Metrics Issues Systemic Risk Risk Assessment Vendor List Final Evaluation Criteria Benefits Formal RFP Evaluation Process Legal Business Rationale Vendor Profiles Legal Review Strategy Alternatives Vendor Evaluation Criteria Initial Vendor Evaluation Shareholder Outsourcing Strategy RESULT ©2000, Michael A. Mische Vendor Conference Vendor Evaluation Criteria Organizational Change Process Change Staff Training Performance Measures Costs Vendor Selection Implementation RFP Initial Decision to Outsource Implementation Strategy Unsystematic Risk Viability Assessment PHASE 5 Final Outsourcing Decision Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Designing for Flawless Execution Achieves maximum efficiency in process execution through: Effective Measurements Meaningful Performance Targets Design Flexibility ©2000, Michael A. Mische Simplicity of Design Flawless Execution & Desired Outcomes Accountability Design of Organizationa l Structure Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Designing for Adaptability The design must: 1. Reflect the organization’s immediate needs as well as longerterm objectives 2. Account for and address the organization’s capabilities and limitations 3. Provide for transferability 4. Incorporate the use of appropriate knowledge and realistic technologies and innovations 5. Be capable of changing to meet the demands of the environment and new technologies ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Designing for Sustainability Characteristics of sustainable designs: 1. Provide for the transfer of knowledge • No abundance of documentation and information • Reflect the unique tacit knowledge 2. Have embedded heuristics • Interrogate the process • Measure performance • Influence the behavioral aspects of the process • Communicate effectiveness 3. Ensure continuous improvement and innovation ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California OE and Organizational Agility Organizational agility is defined as: “The capacity to quickly and efficiently create, redeploy, reconstitute, and reallocate the resources of the organization in a manner which optimizes their use in an environment or allows them to create new environments.” Mische: Strategic Renewal ©2000, Michael A. Mische Organizational agility is the essential enabler of operational excellence. Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Organizational Agility: Observations Agility is a state in which the organization exists. The degree or level of agility is unique for each organization. The need for agility is different for each organization. The ability to be agile is directly related to human performance and the processes and technologies of the organization. Sustaining agility can be more difficult than creating it. ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Creating Organizational Agility Involves processes and structures for: 1. Redeployment and reallocation of resources Introduction of new technologies and processes Addition of new personnel Retraining of existing personnel 2. Selective integration of organizations and processes Organizing resources and actions around core processes and competencies Selective integration of organizations through internal consolidation of common infrastructure functions Selective use of key suppliers, alliance partners and outsourcing specialists Development of Shared Service Organization (SSO) for extraordinary leverage of resources and common services ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California Five Core Processes of Shared Services High-performers excel at the following five core processes: Creating Demand Satisfying Demand Leading the Enterprise Creating Products & Services ©2000, Michael A. Mische Managing Technolog y Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility MOR 559 – Strategic Renewal University of Southern California OE… Summarized OE is central to creating strategic advantage OE is a catalyst for strategic renewal High-performance organizations exhibit operational excellence and organizational agility in a number of ways: – OE is a state in which the organization exists, it is a continuous process – Extend OE to all relevant functions, processes and interactions – Use OE as a catalyst for strategic renewal and change – Make it a strategic imperative to selectively integrate portions of business designs, technologies and outsourcing partners for leverage and economies of scale Operational excellence is central to creating and sustaining strategic advantage and change! ©2000, Michael A. Mische Operational Excellence & Organizational Agility