ATS/ESS 452: Synoptic Meteorology Friday 09/26/2014 • Continue Review Material • Geopotential • Thickness • Thermal Wind Geopotential, Thickness, and the Thermal Wind What is geopotential? Work needed to lift a unit of mass from sea level to a given altitude… Why do we use it? The shape of the Earth’s surface is not a perfect sphere… a slight equatorial bulge occurs due to the centrifugal force, which also disrupts from a perfect gravitational force. It becomes convenient to define a slightly modified gravitational force combining the true gravitational force with the effects of Earth’s rotation. Surfaces of constant geopotential are exactly aligned with the Earth’s oblate surface, leading to a gravitational force given by the gradient in geopotential A change in geopotential is expressed as: Geopotential, Thickness, and the Thermal Wind Using the change in geopotential, the hydrostatic equation, and the gas law, we can obtain a useful relation known as the hypsometric equation This equation tells us that the vertical distance between two pressure surfaces (a.k.a. the thickness) is proportional to the mean virtual temperature in the layer Example… for two given pressure surfaces, the 1000- and 500-mb levels, the colder the mean layer temperature, the smaller the thickness. In other words, pressure decreases more rapidly with height in cold air relative to warm air. Applications of the hypsometric equation: 1.) Temperature forecasting 2.) Precipitation-type forecasting 3.) Understanding atmospheric structure Consider the cross section through a midlatitude cyclone: Now, based on thickness relation, sketch the approximate shape of the 500-mb surface: Hypothetical situation Consider the sfc pressure at all points 1000-mb. The sfc pressure is flat. In the 1000-850-mb layer, the layer average virtual temperature gets gradually colder from south to north. Since thickness is proportional to temperature, the thickness of that layer must decrease to the north – reason for the sloping 850-mb line NP EQ A similar situation occurs in the 850-500-mb and 500-250-mb layers, and we find that the slope of each pressure surface increases as we ascend in altitude. BUT, the temperature structure changes at the tropopause (near 200-300-mb) – it is lower in altitude over the poles. Reversal of the temperature gradient in the stratosphere 200-mb and higher, temperatures are much colder in the tropics relative to the polar regions From Eq (1.33), we know that the geostrophic wind is proportional to the gradient of geopotential height As mentioned before, the slope of the pressure surfaces increase with height, due to the northsouth temp gradient. The greatest slope is found near 250-mb in this example. NP EQ Thus, the geostrophic wind speed increases with height up to the 250-mb level. However, this changes at the tropopause… we find that the wind speed decreases with height. **So the fastest wind speed is located near 200-300-mb… the (polar) jet stream! Let’s consider a tropical cyclone, which is just a large heat engine. They are often referred to as a “warm core” systems. Link Between Fronts and the Jet Stream? Temperature gradients linked to fronts are associated with a regions of enhanced height gradients aloft This in turn, corresponds to strong wind speeds aloft… greater slope of pressure surfaces! **Jet stream aloft is due to thermal contrasts below **Fronts are zones of thermal contrasts Thermal Wind What is the “thermal wind”? Is it really a true wind? NO! The thermal wind is simply a difference between winds – vector difference of the geostrophic wind at 2 levels **It is the vertical shear of the geostrophic wind! A thermal wind vector example: Why is the thermal wind important? Since the geostrophic wind is proportional to the geopotential height… the vertical shear of the geostrophic wind is related to the difference in height (thickness). In other words… the relation between thermal wind & thickness is exactly analogous to the relation between geostrophic wind & geopotential height. Geostrophic Wind (natural coordinates) If we take the geostrophic wind at two different levels (U for upper and L for lower): We now have formulations for an upper level geostrophic wind and a lower level geostrophic wind. The thermal wind is the vertical shear of geostrophic wind, so we need to subtract the upper level from the lower level: The right-hand portion of the above equation is just thickness [ZU – ZL] which is given by the hypsometric equation: If we substitute the hypsometric eqn into the thermal wind eqn: **This tells us that vertical shear of the geostrophic wind (thermal wind) is directly related to the horizontal (virtual) temperature gradient! Observations show that outside the tropics, the atmosphere is generally close to a state of thermal wind balance So, regions with strong horizontal temperature contrasts (tight gradients) imply vertical wind shear! What does this tell us about frontal zones? They are zones of strong vertical wind shear! Can you think of some important operational forecasting implications of this? Thunderstorms/convection/tornadoes? Convective storms that form in regions of strong shear are more likely to exhibit rotation and become severe relative to those that form in weak shear. Thus, convection that takes place in zones of strong thermal contrasts must be monitored carefully Hurricanes? Vertical wind shear is detrimental to tropical cyclones; frontal zones and regions of strong temperature contrasts are not favorable for tropical cyclone activity Also, horizontal temperature advection is related to the geostrophic shear… this has useful forecasting applications that will be discussed in detail with QG Theory How must the N-S temperature gradient be oriented to have westerly winds increasing with height? Using the Cartesian coordinate form of the thermal wind equation: we see that if colder temperatures are located to the north, then the westerly winds will increase with height within the troposphere. This figure is consistent with the previous one, except it features a narrow horizontal jet. The jet stream increases in strength with height up to the tropopause, and then weakens with height in the lower stratosphere. At the level of the jet core, the temperature gradient is weak to zero. Red arrows indicate the meridional temperature gradient Temperature Advection & Thermal Wind Regions where the 1000-mb height contours are crossing 500-mb height contours at a strong angle correspond to regions of strong horizontal temperature (thickness) gradient The thermal wind is oriented parallel to thickness contours with lower (colder) values to the left If we consider thickness contours as layer-average isotherms, then it becomes useful in evaluating the temperature advection within that layer. At point A, the northerly 1000-mb geostrophic wind is associated with cold advection (moving low (cold) thickness values to point A). The westerly 500-mb geostrophic wind is also associated with cold advection. There is clearly geostrophic cold air advection taking place at point A in the 1000-500-mb layer Temperature Advection & Thermal Wind Temperature Advection & Thermal Wind Notice how the geostrophic wind profile turns counter-clockwise with height. This is known as a backing wind profile. In the NH, backing winds are associated with cold air advection. When the geostrophic wind turns clockwise with height, it is called a veering wind profile and is associated with warm air advection. Using QG-theory, we will learn that thermal advection is related to the forcing for vertical air motion WAA is often associated with ascent (lift) CAA is often associated with descent (sinking air) Can often use SLP in place of the 1000-mb geopotential height. So a MSLP and 500-mb height map is often used for a resonable estimate of thermal advection *BUT… The link between veering/backing winds and thermal advection only applies to the GEOSTROPHIC wind Why is this? Frictional Veering The actual wind can veer or back due to other mechanisms that may not be related to thermal advection For example, in the PBL, friction can cause a departure from geostrophic balance. Notice below, that the inclusion of the friction has caused the sfc wind to blow towards the lower pressure. The influence of friction diminishes with height, and the flow becomes more geostrophic So in this example, how does the wind change with height? Implications? GSO sounding from 00Z 25 August 2008 GSO sounding What is the wind profile from 00Z 25 doing here? A 2008 Aug Clockwise with height Veering Wind Profile What is the wind doing? What typeprofile of thermal advection does this imply? can we WarmHow Air Advection (WAA) determine thermal advection? BUT… what can you say about the PBL? It’s relatively deep So this is veering, likely frictional Frictional PBL veering… no implications No implications for ascent for WAA GSO sounding GSO sounding from 00Z 27 August 2008 from 00Z 27 Aug 2008 What is the wind profile doing here? What is the wind Veering profile doing? What type of thermal How can we advection does this imply? determine WAA thermal advection? How about the PBL? Shallow, so the deep veering observed IS geostrophic veering. Shallow PBL, so deep veering is geostrophic WAA is likely occurring. veering g This is also consistent Consistent w/ saturation with the saturated atmospheric profile