Advanced Mediation Working with Resistance Trainer: Nina Meierding, MS, JD Negotiation and Mediation Training Services Bainbridge Island, Washington nina@meierding.com www.mediate.com/ninameierding IMPEDIMENTS and OBSTACLES Inadequate Information Insufficient knowledge to make an informed decision Can be a source of resistance for the advocate/attorney/parent/district personnel Mismanagement of Expectations Higher expectations than could be supported by objective analysis May have occurred through friends, social network, media, attorney, family Principle Underlying moral or value-based position that prevents someone from making a concession that would go against his or her belief Externalities ”Away from the table” factors which impact the ability or desire to settle Often factually or legally unrelated to the current dispute Disagreement About Law/Facts Differing good faith opinions as to the legal or factual merits Inability to Seek Closure Caught in the cycle of conflict Unable to see self in other roles Reinforcement may be occurring for staying in the conflict Machismo, Ego, Loss of Face Concessions seen as: Weakness Betrayal Shameful Disappointing to larger group Emotionality Inability to cognitively process information in a productive way High degree of emotional reactivity Scarce Resources Simply not enough to go around Outcome Avoidance Delaying the inevitable as long as possible Stalling Bias Status quo bias Confirmation bias Keep things the way they are Giving more weight to statements that you agree with Reactive devaluation Discredit the statement if you have distrust or dislike of the person/role delivering the message Hidden Agendas Using “throw away issues” that distract from the negotiation Not being forthright about goals, interests, and intentions Cognitive Overload Too much information at one time Too much reality testing at one time Lack of Authority No access to the people who actually make the decisions Single Text Document Providing a draft of an agreement too early in the negotiation, especially when there is reactive devaluation What to Do? PROACTIVE STRATEGIES Proactive Techniques Separate sessions or joint sessions Support person (friend, relative) Life events and time of meeting during the day Seating arrangement More proactive techniques Private break room Provide snacks and juices/soda/tea/coffee (think warm) Watch your tone and tempo. If the party is feeling pressured, slow down. More proactive techniques Positive consequences to immediately occur (Think behavior modification!) Balance past and future-focused discussions Utilize a team approach Give them some control And…even more proactive techniques Timing is key. The right answer at the wrong time becomes the wrong answer. The right technique at the wrong time becomes the wrong technique. Tailor your negotiation strategies to the beginning stage, the middle stage, and the final stage of negotiation. Impasse Strategies RESOLUTION Anchoring Anchoring to gain rather than loss Also known as framing žSources of resistance Need to win / saving face/ ego Principle Mismanagement of expectations Reframing Reframing an issue Reframing toxic language Sources of resistance High emotionality Mismanagement of expectations Principle Ego, competitive personality Reality Testing BATNA/WATNA/MLATNA Sources of resistance Mismanagement of expectations Disagreement about law or facts Insufficient information to make informed decisions Scarce resources Outcome avoidance Engagement Mirroring Sensory Modality Matching Validation Sources of resistance High emotionality Lack of rapport Reactive devaluation Principle Situational Rules of Fairness Legal, Equitable, Needs based, Faith based Sources of resistance Principle Good faith disagreement about merits of the case Mismanagement of expectations Emotionality Separate Session Separating parties or groups at strategic (not stylistic) moments Sources of resistance Reactive devaluation Pacing Timing Mismanagement of expectations Principle Emotionality Outside Opinion Objective criteria Independent viewpoint Sources of resistance Reactive devaluation Cognitive dissonance Mismanagement of expectations Insufficient information to make decision Linkage Simultaneous, not sequential, negotiation; “if/then” proposal Sources of resistance Single text document Negotiation styles – multiprocessors Scarce resources Externalities Unilateral concessions Making a concession in process, interests, information or substance Sources of resistance Reactive devaluation Negotiation misfires – poor pacing/timing Emotionality Unbundling Breaking a broad topic or issue down into smaller parts. Sources of resistance Avoidance of outcome Reactive devaluation Linear processing Cognitive overload Temporary Agreement Agreeing to a limited duration solution Sources of resistance Inability to seek closure Outcome avoidance Inadequate information Externalities Identify Priorities and Interests Identify wants and needs Sources of resistance Hidden agendas Emotionality Principle Externalities Incubation Take a break, schedule another session, and don’t push for resolution Sources of resistance Avoidance of outcome Emotionality Externalities Ownership of Offers Either encourage individual buy-in or reduce accountability depending on source of resistance Sources of resistance Externalities Poor concessions Reactive devaluation Principle Standards of fairness Now and Future Focused Transition from discussion about the past to present and the future issue Sources of Resistance Hidden agenda Emotionality Bias Outcome avoidance Inability to seek closure Summary Be proactive. Be aware of different levels of readiness. Analyze the source of resistance. Match the impasse-breaking technique to the specific source of resistance. Try it out! If it doesn’t work, re-evaluate and try again.