TEMPLATE INSTRUCTIONS Throughout this template, you will see several sections written in red type. These are sections written with directions regarding how you should format your dissertation so that it meets the requirements of APA style and the Graduate Studies Office. In many instances, the red type will refer you to one of the appendixes for this document. You will also see numerous sections in blue type. These sections provide guidelines regarding the content for various sections of the dissertation. In many instances, the sections in blue type will make references to several of the textbooks used in the program. The black type that you see in this document will either direct you where to type or it may include example text language. You may use this text as a script to help you begin writing the various sections of the dissertation. We encourage you to keep these instructions in your document initially, and then delete them from the final document after you are confident in the content that you have written. California State University, Fullerton DISSERTATION TITLE: THE TITLE SECTION SHOULD LOOK LIKE AN INVERTED PYRAMID AND THE SUBTITLE TYPTICALLY INDICATES THE METHODOLOGY USED FOR THE STUDY A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION In EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP P-12 Leadership (Or) Community College Leadership By Joe A. Student Dissertation Committee Approval: Professor Jane A. Smith, Chair Associate Professor John B. Jones, College of Education Expert Member, Sarah L. Stevens, Anywhere Community College Month, YEAR CSUF Ed.D. Dissertation Template – 8/27/2014 Copyright 20XX © Joe A. Student ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Type your abstract content here. Write the abstract last. This is a concise summary of your study’s purpose and major findings (limit 350 words). Potential readers who conduct searches using library indexes such as ProQuest or Dissertation Abstracts International will have access to your abstract through the search index; they will use your abstract to determine whether or not to read your dissertation, so choose your wording carefully. Note that your abstract will be published online and in ProQuest. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................. viii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................... x DEDICATION ................................................................................................... xii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................... xiii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 1 Background of the Problem ................................................................... A Heading with a Very Long Title Should be Shortened, but if not, then Indent the Second Line an Additional 5 Spaces ....................... Problem Statement ................................................................................ Purpose Statement ................................................................................ Research Questions .............................................................................. Significance of the Study ....................................................................... Scope of the Study ................................................................................ Assumptions of the Study ........................................................... Study Delimitations ..................................................................... Study Limitations ......................................................................... Definitions of Key Terms ........................................................................ Organization of the Dissertation ............................................................. 1 2 3 3 4 6 6 7 7 7 8 9 CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ............................................... 10 Historical, Philosophical, and/or Theoretical Foundation ....................... Philosophical Foundation ............................................................ Historical Foundation .................................................................. Theoretical Foundation ............................................................... Review of the Scholarly Empirical Literature .......................................... Conceptual Framework ............................................................... Student Outcomes ...................................................................... Teacher Attitudes ........................................................................ Teacher Behaviors ...................................................................... Chapter Summary .................................................................................. iv 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 15 15 15 CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ................................................. 16 Qualitative/Quantitative/Mixed Methods Research ................................ Research Design ................................................................................... Research Methods ................................................................................. Setting ......................................................................................... Sample ........................................................................................ Data Collection and Management ............................................... Data Analysis and Interpretation ................................................. Chapter Summary .................................................................................. 17 18 19 20 20 22 24 27 CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS ................................................................................. 28 First Research Question ........................................................................ Second Research Question ................................................................... Third Research Question ....................................................................... Chapter Summary .................................................................................. 29 30 30 30 CHAPTER 5: DISCUSSION ............................................................................ 31 Interpretations/Conclusions ................................................................... Implications ............................................................................................ Implications for Policy ................................................................. Implications for Practice .............................................................. Implications for Theory ................................................................ Implications for Future Research ................................................ Recommendations ................................................................................. Type a Heading for Your First Recommendation Here ............... Type a Heading for Your Second Recommendation Here .......... Type a Heading for Your Third Recommendation Here .............. Type a Heading for Your Fourth Recommendation Here ............ Summary of the Dissertation.................................................................. 31 32 32 32 33 33 33 34 34 34 34 34 REFERENCES ................................................................................................. 36 APPENDICES .................................................................................................. 37 A. B. C. D. E. F. APPENDIX FORMAT: THIS IS THE APPENDIX TITLE.................... GENERAL FORMATTING GUIDELINES ........................................... HEADINGS, SERIATION, AND BULLETED TABS ............................ TABLES AND FIGURES .................................................................... CITATIONS AND QUOTATIONS ....................................................... CUTTING AND PASTING CONTENT INTO THE DISSERTATION TEMPLATE ........................................................................................ For additional headings, you can copy and paste the above headings. v 37 38 39 42 44 47 If you have only one appendix, then type in APPENDIX: TITLE rather than as shown above. A single appendix is not identified with a letter. For more than one appendix, the pagination for the first appendix is the same as listed for APPENDICES. vi LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Frequency of Survey Participants by Race and Gender ...................... 42 2. A Table with a Very Long Title Should be Shortened, but if not, Extend to a Second Line without Additional Spaces ............................ 50 Formatting Notes You can copy and paste this list if you need additional titles. Number tables sequentially in the order that they appear in the dissertation. Do not re-start numbering at each chapter. Titles listed here should be the same as within the text. Give every title a brief but clear and explanatory title. If titles must exceed the length of the dot leaders, do not allow them to enter the page number column. Additional pages begin at the top one-inch margin. Consult the APA manual! Be sure your tables are formatted to look exactly like the ones in the manual. If you have any questions, ask the Dissertation Reader early Notes Regarding the Use of Tables vii Tables should only be used in a very limited way in Chapters 1 and 2 and are not to take the place of text in the body. Rather, tables serve a supplementary function for the points made in the text that you write. viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Dissertation formatting is exhausting ...................................................... 44 2. Correct means of highlighting text to cut from your original document ... 47 3. Incorrect means of highlighting text to cut from your original document . 48 4. Highlighting template text that you wish to replace................................. 48 5. Using the merge formatting function ....................................................... 49 6. A figure with a very long name should be shortened, but if not, extend to a second line without additional spaces .................................. 50 Formatting Notes You can copy and paste this list if you need additional titles. Captions listed here must be the same as within the text. If captions exceed the length of the dot leaders, do not allow them to enter the page number column, which includes the blank spaces between the dot leaders and the page number. Additional pages begin at the top one-inch margin. Consult the APA manual! Be sure your figures are formatted to look exactly like the ones in the manual. Notes Regarding the Use of Figures Any type of illustration other than a table is called a figure and includes charts, dot maps, shaded maps, graphs (e.g., scatter plots, line graphs, bar ix graphs, pictorial graphs, pie graphs), photographs, drawings, diagrams, or other depictions. Figures function to augment, condense, or organize the text, and the number of figures varies in each dissertation. As with tables, student generated figures are used only in a very limited way in Chapters 1 and 2 and are not to take the place of text in the body. Rather, figures serve a supplementary function for the points made in the text that you write. x To my amazing children, Terrell and Silvia, wise beyond their years, and To my beloved wife, Maria, infinitely supportive. This is an optional section in which you may dedicate your dissertation to a person or group of people, an organization, or a cause. Dedications are typically one or two sentences in length, and being with “To . . . . ” No heading is required on this page. Its text should be centered horizontally between the left and right margin, as well as vertically between the top 2” margin and the bottom margin. xi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Type your acknowledgements text here. This is an optional section in which you may thank friends, mentors, colleagues, supporters, and/or institutions that supported your research or provided special assistance. You may also thank faculty or staff members; if your advisors or committee members offered routine help, you may omit them entirely. Observe the same formatting guidelines for this section, including margins and double-spacing. It must match the main text. xii 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Type your opening content here. This chapter provides an introduction to and overview of the dissertation. The opening paragraphs of your dissertation are critical because they set the tone for the rest of your dissertation. You should begin with a “hook” that grabs the reader’s attention, but be sure that your hook is relevant to your topic and does not detract from the scholarly tone of your dissertation. Your reader should gain a clear sense of your study’s topic by reading just this opening section. This section can be as short as one well-written paragraph; in most cases, it should be no longer than 2-3 pages in length. See pages 97-100 in the Creswell (2009) Research Design text for more information. If you wish to use something more substantive, you should first consult with your faculty and/or your dissertation chair. Background of the Problem Type your background content here. The background of the problem section is the most general and is usually longer than the problem statement and purpose statement sections (approximately 4-6 pages). This section contains information that brings your readers “up to speed” with your topic and lays the groundwork for the problem 2 statement. By the time you that have finished providing the background of the problem, the reader should have a sense of the nature and scope of the problem. When writing the background of the problem section, assume your reader has limited familiarity with your topic. Your job is to convince this person that your topic is an educational problem that warrants further investigation. Oftentimes, writers assume that others will share their convictions regarding the selected topic. This may work if your audience consists solely of more progressive educators; however, if your audience includes board members, policymakers, or other external educational stakeholders, you will need to demonstrate why your topic is a relevant problem in terms that are meaningful to them. While you should draw primarily from scholarly sources, you may draw upon the content of newspapers, reports, editorials, or professional magazines to help demonstrate the importance of your topic. Note that you must frame these as non-scholarly works. For example, “Lee (2012), in a recent editorial, suggested. . .” You might also draw on documents and sources that describe regional economic, demographic, or political trends. This section might include (a) the historical context of your topic, (b) summaries of competing policy arguments regarding your topic, (c) a review of relevant theories or philosophical viewpoints, or (d) citations of authors who have called for research addressing your topic. This review should identify what a reasonable reader can confidently deduce from the literature as well as notable limitations and gaps within the literature. 3 Problem Statement Type your problem statement content here. Following the prior background section, the problem statement demonstrates to your reader why your topic is important. This section should “close the deal” and convince any reasonable reader that your topic is worthy of empirical study. Be sure to include its relevance beyond the research context within which it is developed. The organization of this section typically summarizes (a) your claim that the topic is important, (b) what is known about this topic from the literature and what has not been investigated or solved up to this point, (c) limitations and gaps in the current literature, and (d) how additional research could inform policy and practice. This section must include your problem statement. For example, you might state, “The problem that this study addresses is ______.” A strong problem statement will set up the purpose statement for your study, which you will identify in the next section. Depending on the nature of your topic, the problem statement may range from 1-3 paragraphs in length. For more information, see pages 69-82 in the Creswell (2007) Educational Research text, pages 100-110 in the Creswell (2009) Research Design text, and pages 148-150 in the Creswell and Plano Clark Mixed Methods Research (2011) text. Purpose Statement Type your purpose statement content here. Assuming that you have developed a strong problem statement, this section can consist of one well-written paragraph. Your purpose statement 4 should introduction your methodological approach. For example, “The purpose of this mixed methods study was to. . . .” The purpose of the research should be preceded by a sentence or two that moves the reader, in a cohesive way, from the problem to the purpose of your study. By the time that your readers get to the purpose of the research, they should be thinking, “Of course, this is the purpose!” For information on purpose statements in general, see chapter six (pp. 111-127) in the Creswell (2009) Research Design text; for information specific to mixed methods purpose statements, see pages 151-160 in the Creswell and Plano Clark (2011) Mixed Methods Research text. For your early drafts, use the fill-in-the-blank templates or “scripts” provided in your textbooks (Creswell, 2009, pp. 114, 118, 122-123; Creswell & Plano Clark, 2011, pp. 154-159). Research Questions Type your research question content here. Use one or two sentences to transition from the purpose statement to the research questions. For example, “The following research questions will guide this quantitative study” or “In order to accomplish this purpose, I have posed the following research questions” or “The following four research questions will guide this mixed methods research study:” 1. What is the relationship between the measures of teacher attitudes, teacher behaviors, and student outcomes? 2. How do students describe their perceptions of their teachers’ attitudes and behaviors? 5 3. In what ways do student perceptions about teacher attitudes and behaviors explain the relationships between measures teacher attitudes and behaviors with student outcome measures? For the format of dissertation research questions, observe the example above (see also Appendix C). Note that the tabs align by .5-inch increments. Try to limit the number of questions so that your research study is manageable. Most studies will have between two and four research questions, and your selected methodology will inform the types of questions you use. Note the following: If your study is qualitative only, you may have a single guiding question, possibly supported by 2-3 research questions. If your study is quantitative only, you may pair a set of formal hypotheses with your research questions. There may be more than one hypothesis for each research question. While hypotheses are value-laden, they should have an empirical referent, i.e., a measurable quality. Hypotheses should be related to available statistical techniques and should be related to a body of theory. If you use mixed methods, you should have at least one qualitative and at least one quantitative research question followed by a concluding mixed methods research question. For more information on writing strong research questions, see chapter seven (pp. 129-143) in your Creswell (2009) Research Design text. The Creswell and Plano Clark (2011) Mixed Methods Research text includes valuable information 6 and guidelines for writing mixed methods research questions as well as example mixed methods research questions for each of their various mixed methods designs (see pp. 160-168). If you plan to use an appreciative inquiry approach, review chapter five in the Reed (2006) text regarding the design of your research questions. Significance Type your significance section content here. Begin this section with a statement along the lines of the following: “This research is important and will make a significant contribution to educational leadership because. . . .” Discuss why your research will be a valuable addition to the field, and why it is potentially beneficial to you as a practitioner. Use this section to identify which sets of educators (presidents, superintendents, faculty, instructors, student affairs professionals, etc.) or stakeholders (board members, policymakers, parents, etc.) will benefit from your study. You should anticipate here how they might use the results to inform their practice, decisions, etc. This section typically consists of 1-3 well-written paragraphs. Scope of the Study Type the opening for your scope of the study section here. Use this section to explain to your reader the range of your study, meaning what you will and will not consider. The opening paragraph typically summarizes this content. The three sub-sections (assumptions, delimitations, and limitations) expand upon this opening in specific ways as outlined below. 7 Assumptions of the Study Type your assumptions content here. The assumptions of the study are suppositions that you make as a condition of the study, but that you will not test as a part of the study. For example, you may assume that participants respond to the questions of a survey truthfully, or you might assume that grades are an accurate measure of students’ academic achievement. The assumptions that you identify should consist of items that a reasonable person will accept as a provision for your study. This section typically consists of 1-3 well-written paragraphs. Study Delimitations Type your delimitations content here. The delimitations of a study are those aspects that you deliberately choose not to consider in your study. For example, you may choose to delimit your study to a specific subpopulation of students, to a single campus or region, or to specific measures of institutional effectiveness. For each of these, you could choose otherwise, but you are electing to focus your study as outlined here. Since you choose the delimitations for your study, the rationale for your choices should be evident to your reader. You need to make clear to your reader why the study will be stronger because of the delimitations you selected. This section typically consists of 1-3 well-written paragraphs, though it can be longer. Study Limitations Type your limitations content here. 8 The limitations of a study are those aspects that are beyond your control as a researcher that you would typically address if it were possible. For example, you may use a dataset for your study that does not include demographic information about the participants; if you could, you would choose to include that information as a part of your study, but that choice is not an option. For example, if you were comparing three schools’ test results and the data were incomplete for one school due to a computer malfunction, that would create a limitation for your study. Oftentimes, your limitations may reflect the one-year timeframe for completing the dissertation. This section typically consists of 1-3 well-written paragraphs though it may be longer. Definitions of Key Terms Type your content for the definitions of key terms here. When selecting terms to include in this section, consider what a typical reader may need to know as she or he proceeds to read your literature review. Your list will typically consist of technical vocabulary, jargon, abbreviations, acronyms, or expressions or terms that have competing definitions within the literature (e.g., persistence v. retention) or that will be used in the proposal. You should include citations to support your definitions whenever possible. Though the number of terms included here can vary significantly depending on the topic, a typical dissertation includes 5-10 terms. You should typically list your terms in alphabetical order. In terms of format, use a Level 4 APA style heading as follows: 9 Term. Use a minimum of one complete sentence to define this term. Do not use sentence fragments. You may use quotes and citations. Term. Use a minimum of one complete sentence to define this term. Organization of the Dissertation Type your organization of the dissertation content here. You should close chapter one with a concise summary of the chapter contents (problem, purpose, significance, scope, key terms) followed by a preview the organization of the rest of the dissertation. For example, “In Chapter 1, I provided a context regarding . . . , and then defined the problem and purpose of this study. I further discussed the significance and scope of the study and provided definitions for key terms. Chapter 2 presents a critical review of the literature pertaining to the research question. Chapter 3 contains the research design, including data collection and analysis methods. Chapter 4 presents the study’s findings, and in Chapter 5, I discuss conclusions, interpretations, and recommendations for policy and practice.” 10 CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE Type your opening for chapter 2 here. To open chapter two, provide a concise summary of the problem and purpose of the study (you do not typically re-state the research questions here). This opening should typically consist of a single well-written paragraph. At the end of this paragraph, conclude with a sentence previewing the overall organization of this chapter. For most dissertations, this will consist of two parts. The first is the philosophical, historical, and/or theoretical foundation (you may use one or more of these or your study may not include a foundation section at all). The second is the review of empirical literature. Thus, one may end this opening paragraph as follows: “At the beginning of this chapter, I review the philosophical and theoretical foundations of this study. Next, I provide an extensive review of the empirical research related to the dissertation topic. I conclude with a chapter summary.” The literature review itself can vary significantly in length. As a very rough guide, your literature review should be between 5,000 words (approximately 20 pages) and 10,000 words (approximately 40 pages) in length, but you can work outside of these guidelines when you can present a strong rationale for doing so. Remember to consider the focus of your study as your goal is not to review all the literature that could relate to your topic, but to provide an in-depth, saturated 11 review of the literature that is necessarily related to your topic. It is also wise to begin with the end in mind. Consider what types of findings might emerge from your study and what sets of literature you will need to discuss in Chapter 5 in order to interpret those findings. For more information on the role of the literature review in a research study, see chapter four (pp. 88-119) in the Creswell (2007) Educational Research text or chapter two (pp. 23-48) in the Creswell (2009) Research Design text. Philosophical, Historical, and/or Theoretical Foundation Type your content for the opening of this section or these sections here. The largest portion of the literature review is typically your review of empirical research related to your study (see the next section). That said, many literature reviews begin with a philosophical, historical, and/or theoretical foundation that informs how you, the researcher, approach your review of the literature as well as the design of your study. Three of the most common types of foundations are listed below. Note that you may use one or more of these in your study, or you might use none of them. Philosophical Foundation Type your philosophical foundation content here. If you plan to use a specific philosophical worldview to inform your study, you should discuss it here. For example, if you plan to conduct your study with the intent of specifically addressing racist structures in higher education systems that oppress students or professionals of color, you might choose to use critical race theory as a philosophical foundation; if your interest is primarily in how 12 participants make meaning of their life experiences, you might draw upon existentialism as a philosophical foundation. If you identify a philosophical foundation, you need to describe it for your readers so that they can understand how it informs the way you select and review literature, craft your methodology and research design, and go about your data collection and analysis. Historical Foundation Present your historical framework content here. You may refer to this as historical context depending on how this content informs your overall study. For many studies, it is important that the reader have a strong understanding of the historical context of the topic. For example, it may be difficult for a typical reader to fully understand a study addressing community colleges or educational accountability without a thorough review of the history that has led up to current realities. Your task with a historical foundation is to present a well-organized presentation of those historical aspects with sufficient clarity to help your reader understand the interpretations of your findings that you will present later in Chapter 5. Theoretical Foundation Type your theoretical foundation content here. If you plan to draw heavily on specific organizational, leadership, learning, or student development theories, you should provide a description of that theory (or those theories) here. This may be a specific theory or a body of related theories. In many dissertations, this will be referred to as a “theoretical framework.” Instead, we typically use the term “theoretical foundation” to 13 demonstrate the connection to the prior foundations and to help clarify the distinction with the conceptual framework of the review of empirical literature as discussed in the next section. Note that your purpose in presenting a theoretical foundation is to help your reader understand the content of the theory, how it was developed, and the potential strengths and limitations of the theory. You may present empirical research here that has tested the validity of your theory/theories, but you should not yet present a review of empirical research that has utilized your selected theory/theories as a foundation—you will present that content in the next section of the literature review. Review of the Scholarly Empirical Literature Type a short transition sentence or paragraph here. Conceptual Framework Type your conceptual framework content here. The conceptual framework refers to how you have organized the content of your review of empirical literature. Begin with a statement along the lines of, “The conceptual framework for this study is grounded in (state the number of) concepts.” and continue by listing these concepts as a series of sentences, one sentence per major concept. Note that each major concept that you list here should correspond with the major headings utilized in this section of your literature review. Note the following example: “The conceptual framework for this study is grounded in three broad concepts. The first of these is research that has addressed student outcomes in terms of their academic achievement. The 14 second is research that has examined how teacher attitudes affect student outcomes. Lastly, I review research that has examined the relationships between various forms of teacher behaviors and student academic achievement.” Note that you should base the content of this section of your literature primarily (if not exclusively) on research findings—do not include theoretical writings here. Your analysis and synthesis should consistently consider the methodological designs of the studies reviewed as well as your evaluation of the studies’ strengths and limitations. The following is provided as an example of how this might fit with the conceptual framework content presented above. Student Outcomes The research addressing student outcomes is quite large and relevant to this study. In this section, I focus my review of research addressing student outcomes on (a) student grades, (b) students’ performance on standardized tests, and (c) other measures of students’ academic achievement. Student grades. The research addressing. . . . Students’ performance on standardized tests. Many studies have. . . . Other measures of student’s academic achievement. In addition to research addressing grades and standardized test scores, numerous studies have. . . . 15 Teacher Attitudes A significant body of research has addressed the role of teacher attitudes as related to student learning. In this section, I address research addressing the following three aspects of teacher attitudes: (a). . . , (b). . . , and (c). . . . Teacher Behaviors In addition to teacher attitudes, a large number of empirical studies have examined the influence of teacher behaviors on student learning. My summary of this body of research is organized around the four themes of (a). . . , (b). . . , (c). . . , and (d). . . . Chapter Summary Type your chapter summary content here. The chapter summary serves three key purposes. First, it provides a concise summary of what we know from the current literature. Second, it identifies significant limitations and gaps in the current literature. Third, it uses these gaps to set up the transition from the literature review to the research methods in chapter three and how your study will address the gaps in the literature. 16 CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Type the opening to your chapter 3 here. To open Chapter 3, the first paragraph is typically a concise (½ page), well-written summary of the problem. This should flow naturally from the transition you provided in your summary at the end of Chapter 2. In the second paragraph, you should re-state your purpose statement and your research questions. Use your language from Chapter 1 for the purpose statement, limiting it to the 1-3 sentences used to present the purpose statement. If you elaborated on the purpose statement with multiple paragraphs, do not include those here. If you identified hypotheses as a part of a quantitative study, you should re-state them here as well. In the third paragraph, provide a quick preview of the organization of the rest of your chapter three. For example, “In this chapter, I first present the methodology for this study including a discussion of its philosophical foundations. Next, I provide a description of the research design within my selected methodological approach that I will use in this study. Following the research design, I detail the specific research methods used in this study. This description includes information about the setting, sample, data collection including instrumentation and procedure, and data analysis including 17 validity/trustworthiness and the role of the researcher. I conclude with a chapter summary.” Qualitative/Quantitative/Mixed Methods Research Type your methodology content here. In the first major section of your chapter three, you should provide an overview of your selected study methodology or paradigm: quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods. This must include a justification for why your selected methodology is best suited to answer your research questions. Provide a description of the philosophical foundation and assumptions of the paradigms, its purpose, and its strengths and limitations. Conclude this section by providing a rationale for why this research paradigm best fits with your purpose and research questions. Your may elect to organize this section with four paragraphs, one to address each of the following questions: 1. What is qualitative/quantitative/mixed methods research? 2. What are the philosophical foundations of qualitative/quantitative/mixed methods research? 3. What are the strengths and limitations of qualitative/quantitative/mixed methods research? (Make sure that you make clear to your reader how the strengths outweigh the limitations.) 4. Why is qualitative/quantitative/mixed methods the best fit for this study? 18 Chapters two in the Creswell (2007) Educational Research text and one in the Creswell (2009) Research Design text provide a nice introduction to quantitative and qualitative approaches to research. For mixed methods studies, you should draw on chapters one and two (pp. 1-52) in the Creswell and Plano Clark (2011) text. If you choose to draw upon the principles of appreciative inquiry, use content from chapters two and three in the Reed (2006) text. Note that the length of this section can vary significantly; it is often 2-4 pages in length. Research Design Type your research design content here. Within each of the three broad methodological paradigms listed above, there are multiple research designs that lay out plans for enacting research within the broader paradigm. Within the quantitative paradigm, the most commonly used research designs are experimental designs, correlational designs, and survey designs. Within the qualitative paradigm are grounded theory, ethnography, phenomenology, narrative research, and discourse analysis, among others. Commonly used mixed methods research designs include triangulation or convergent designs, sequential explanatory and exploratory designs, and embedded designs. Depending on the forms of data collection and analysis used, case study research designs may fall under either the qualitative or the mixed methods paradigms. Note that your selected research design must align with the methodology discussed in the prior section. Write this section by providing a 1-3 page description of your specific research design. Your goal should be to provide enough information about your 19 design so that your reader can understand the more specific research methods that you set forth in the next section. In this section of Chapter 3, you should not yet detail the specifics of your study as that content goes in the next section of Chapter 3. As with the prior section, draw heavily from the appropriate section(s) of the four primary texts as well as other methodological works to provide this description. You should not rely solely on texts used in class such as Creswell (2007, 2009), Creswell and Plano Clark (2011), and Reed (2006). Research Methods Type the opening to your research methods section here. The research design that you just finished writing included information about the design. For example, you wrote about grounded theory or about survey research or about an exploratory mixed methods design. In this section, you detail the steps that you will take to apply (and in many cases adapt) this research design to your study. Thus, the research methods section is your “instruction manual” or “recipe” for carrying out the study. You should explain this transition in this opening paragraph. For example: In this section, I will describe the specific research methods that I utilized to apply <insert the name of your research design> in this study. Specifically, I will discuss the setting, sample, data collection, data analysis, and steps taken to ensure validity or trustworthiness.” If you are conducting mixed methods research, you should state up front how you will present content for the quantitative and qualitative phases of your study. For example, “Given the two-phase nature of this mixed methods study, I will discuss the qualitative and quantitative methods separately 20 in each section.” See pages 251-257 in the Creswell and Plano Clark (2011) text for a discussion of strategies for writing mixed methods proposals and methods. What follows is a typical layout of the research design section. That said, the sequencing of content in this section can vary widely, especially in mixed methods studies where one has to consider whether to present content for the various phases of the study side-by-side or sequentially. In any case, the sequence that you choose should that which best enables you describe your research design to your reader. It may be helpful to think of writing a “recipe” in which you describe the rationale and steps of your research design in sufficient detail so that someone else could complete the study for you. Setting Type your setting content here. You may also elect to describe this as the context of your study. Provide a description of the context of your proposed study, including the site location(s) and characteristics of the site(s). Descriptions may include commentary regarding the economic, social, cultural, and organizational elements of the research context. Demographic data (e.g., percentage of diversity within the population) should be presented. The length of this section will depend on the nature of the study; you will need to provide more information if it is likely that the setting will have a significant effect upon the findings. Sample Type your sample content here. 21 In this section, describe your sample, which consists of who you will study and how you will access this population. Describe the actions that you plan to take to identify the participants and how you propose to gain access to them. Provide a description of the characteristics of the participants and why or how their perceptions about the research problem will inform the study. Project the number of participants whom you will involve in your study to ensure depth and breadth of data collection. Discuss also how you will ensure the ethical protection of your participants (in alignment with IRB requirements). If you have agreed to keep the identity of participants confidential or anonymous, you must discuss why that is the case and how that will be assured. This section is typically a couple pages in length. For your proposal, you should write about your anticipated sample; for your final dissertation, re-write this section to describe the sample that you actually secured. For quantitative studies, you should review the sections addressing sampling in the Creswell (2007) Education Research text (pp. 150-157) and the Creswell (2009) Research Design text (pp. 155-157). For qualitative studies, review the sections addressing sampling in the Creswell (2007) Education Research text (pp. 213-219). For mixed methods designs, you will need to consider sampling procedures for each of the portions of your study; in addition to the sections above, review the sampling content from chapter six of the Creswell and Plano Clark (2011) Mixed Methods Research text. Reed (2006) has also provided addition information about sampling in appreciative inquiry 22 studies in chapter six (pp. 111-135). You should provide multiple citations to these texts and other sources to support your sampling criteria and rationale. Data Collection and Management Type an introduction to your data collection and management content here. This section often consists of three sub-sections addressing (a) instrumentation, (b) procedures for data collection, and (c) data management strategies. This said, you should organize and sequence your content in a manner that will most clearly communicate your process to your reader. For more information on quantitative data collection, see pages 157-179 in the Creswell (2007) Educational Research text and pages 145-162 in the Creswell (2009) Research Design text. For more information on qualitative data collection, see pages 220-239 in the Creswell (2007) Educational Research text and pages 178-182 in the Creswell (2009) Research Design text. For mixed methods, review chapter six in the Creswell and Plano Clark (2009) Mixed Methods Research text; for appreciative inquiry approaches, review chapter six in the Reed (2006) Appreciative Inquiry text. Instrumentation. Type your instrumentation content here. Describe any instruments and the types of data you plan to collect in your study. For a quantitative study, this will include a discussion of the surveys, questionnaires, or data sets used in the study. If you designed your instrument, provide detailed information about the steps that you took to draft, pilot, test, revise, and/or finalize the instrument as well as specific steps taken to ensure 23 validity. If you use an instrument that someone else has designed, provide information about the instrument’s design and any reliability testing from prior administrations of the instrument. Depending on the context and complexity of your instrumentation, this section may be 2-3 pages or more in length. For qualitative studies, the researcher becomes the research instrument. You will discuss this in greater detail in the “role of the researcher” section, which can be presented here, but which is typically presented later in the chapter. Here, you should identify and define the types of data that you plan to collect, such as observations, field notes, interview and/or focus group data, documents, and artifacts. Additionally, you should discuss your interview or observations protocols (e.g. the list of questions asked during interviews) and the strategies that you used to design these protocols. For mixed methods studies, you will need to draw on both quantitative and qualitative instrumentation. If the findings from one part of your study influence or support the instrumentation for the other part of your study, you should discuss that here. For example, some studies begin with qualitative interviews and the findings related to those interviews inform the content of questions asked in a follow-up quantitative survey. Procedures. Type your procedure content here. Use this section to describe the steps that you will take to collect your data. This section should consist of timelines, steps taken to access your sample, etc. For qualitative studies, you should additionally project the kind, number, and length of the observations, interviews, or focus groups that you plan 24 to conduct as well as the names or types of documents or objects of material culture that you plan to collect. For mixed methods studies, you need to outline the sequence of data collection procedures so that your reader understands how data collection in one part of the study may be influenced by data collection or analysis in another part of the study. Data management. Type your data management content here. Include a brief discussion of the data management methods that you will use to collect and archive data (e.g., storage and protection of text files, audio and video tapes, digital information, survey instruments). Data Analysis and Interpretation Type an introduction your data analysis and interpretation section here. In this section, describe your rationale and steps for data analysis. This section often includes sub-sections addressing (a) analysis, (b) validity and/or trustworthiness, and (c) the role of the researcher. There may also be a subsection that specifically addresses mixed methods or appreciative inquiry analyses and interpretations. For more information on quantitative data analysis and interpretation, see chapter seven in the Creswell (2007) Educational Research text and pages 162-170 in the Creswell (2009) Research Design text. For more information on qualitative data analysis and interpretation, see chapter nine in the Creswell (2007) Educational Research text and pages 183-200 in the Creswell (2009) Research Design text. For mixed methods designs, see chapter eight in the Creswell and Plano Clark (2011) Mixed Methods Research text; for 25 appreciative inquiry, see chapter seven in the Reed (2006) Appreciative Inquiry text. Data analysis. Type your data analysis content here. For quantitative studies, this section should provide a description of how you will work with the data in terms of processing of data, data coding and entry, and accuracy checks. In addition, students should provide a thorough explanation of which statistical procedures will be used for each research question and hypothesis. This discussion should address the assumptions of these statistical tools as well as any relevant information regarding their strengths and/or limitations. If you plan to use data analysis software such as SPSS, describe the software and how you will utilize it. For qualitative studies, discuss the coding procedures that you plan to use. For example, you might discuss how you will reduce the raw data into key words and phrases (preliminary data analysis), identify conceptual categories (interim data analysis), and then identify emergent themes. If you plan to use data analysis software such as Atlas.ti, describe the software and how you will utilize it. For the final dissertation, be sure to demonstrate that you understand the relationship between data analysis and the construction of meaning as well as how you have developed “self-conscious” awareness of the relationship between the methods that you used and the conceptual understandings that you developed from an interpretive perspective. For mixed methods studies, you will need to address quantitative and qualitative data analysis separately. In addition, you will need to discuss the 26 strategies that you will use to conduct the mixed analysis—for analyzing quantitative findings in light of qualitative findings and vice versa. Procedures to ensure validity and/or trustworthiness. Type your validity and/or trustworthiness content here. In quantitative studies, this is typically called “validity” whereas it is often referred to as “trustworthiness” in qualitative studies. In mixed methods studies, either or both term may be used. For quantitative studies, emphasis is typically on the reliability of the instrument and the application of statistical tools. When self-report data are used, you should provide a basis for your confidence in the validity of those data. For qualitative studies, discuss strategies utilized such as data triangulation, member checks, and inter-coder reliability. You should include multiple references to scholarly sources to support your rationale for methods used to ensure validity and/or trustworthiness. Role of the researcher. Type your role of the researcher content here. Most qualitative dissertations include this section, but few quantitative studies do. We recommend it regardless of your approach because you, as the researcher, will affect your study’s findings regardless of your methodological approach. For those of you doing quantitative studies, note that this is fully consistent with its postpositivist foundations. Regardless of your approach and whether or not you choose to draw upon appreciative inquiry, you should review the “Researcher Position” section (pp. 82-85) in the Reed (2006) text. For qualitative studies, the researcher becomes the research instrument, the lens through which information is filtered. Disclose your positionality on the 27 participant-observer continuum as well as your underlying assumptions, including your point of view and biases. Describe how you will address any potentially negative influences that might result from your role in the research. For quantitative studies, consider how choice of instruments or the wording of questions might influence the results as well as strategies used to ensure that your interpretations of statistically significant findings are reasonably free of bias and open to alternative interpretations. Chapter Summary Type your chapter summary content here. The chapter summary (typically one well-written paragraph) should summarize the problem and review the content of the research questions as they relate to your research design and methods (do not re-state the research questions here). This review should serve as a transition to chapter four where you will present your research findings organized around your research questions. 28 CHAPTER 4 FINDINGS Type the opening for your chapter 4 here. For the opening paragraph of Chapter 4, present a concise summary of the methodology. Conclude this opening paragraph with a preview of the organization of the chapter. In many instances (especially for quantitative studies), the organization of chapter four reflects the organization of the research questions. In some cases (typically qualitative studies), the research design and/or your findings will dictate a different organization. If this is the case, you should discuss in the opening and closing sections of the chapter how the findings presented fit with the research questions. Chapter 4, however, will be unique for each dissertation, depending on the research questions to be addressed and the type of data collected. Also important are the expectations of your dissertation chair. You would be wise to discuss with your chair a plan for how to organize and write your Chapter 4 so that you can get her or his feedback and approval before you start writing. The following are a list of things that you must have or do in Chapter 4: Call attention to significant findings. Write in the past tense. Present findings and data that are logically connected to the problem statement and research questions. Present evidence to answer the research questions. 29 For quantitative studies, identify the significance level when statistically significant results emerge. Also for quantitative studies that included hypotheses, state whether the hypotheses have been accepted or rejected. For qualitative studies, present “thick descriptions” with significant details for qualitative data. For mixed methods studies, present a separate section that specifically addresses findings unique to the mixed methods analyses. Present any unanticipated results. The following are a list of things that you should generally not do in Chapter 4: Do not make sweeping interpretations. Do not reach conclusions. Do not state your opinions or editorialize. Do not draw implications, though you can highlight important data that support implications that you will discuss in Chapter 5. The next section presents one potential means of organizing Chapter 4. It is likely that many students will depart from this structure, especially those who conduct qualitative and mixed methods studies. First Research Question Type the opening for this section’s content here. 30 When introducing this section, re-state the research question(s) that is/are being addressed. Then present the findings in a manner consistent with the research question. Second Research Question Type your opening to this section here. Follow the same format here as for the first research question. Use care not to interpret findings, but you should include an introduction to this section that serves as a clear transition from the content and findings of the prior section to the content and findings of this section. Third Research Question Type your opening to this section here. Follow the same format here as for the first research questions. If there are additional research questions, add sections for them below. Chapter Summary Type your chapter summary content here. Up to this point, you have presented all of your findings in significant detail. With the chapter summary, you should identify the most significant findings from the chapter. Do not present any new findings or information here— simply summarize the most significant findings. This will serve as a transition to chapter five. 31 CHAPTER 5 DISCUSSION Type your opening content for Chapter 5 here. To open Chapter 5, present a concise summary of the entire study—the problem, purpose statement, research questions, and methodological approach. Note that Chapter 5 is where your voice comes forward. The purpose of this chapter is to provide your interpretation of the meaning of the results. Great care should be taken to craft a clear opening section since this section will provide the organizational structure for the chapter. Interpretations/Conclusions Type an opening for your interpretations/conclusions section here. Depending on the design of your study, you may label this section either “Interpretations” or “Conclusions.” In some instances, you may wish to precede this section with a summary of findings. The summary of major findings is similar to the chapter summary from chapter four in that you focus on the most important and significant findings from your study. The difference in chapter five is that you now include your interpretations of what the findings mean. As you present and interpret the findings, you should note the strengths and potential limitations of those findings, especially as related to your research design. Along with your interpretations, you should draw connections to the literature review (both framework(s) and empirical research) noting how your findings are similar to or 32 different from those of other studies. Thus, you will cite sources from your literature review extensively here. In some instances, students will elect to simply present a concise summary of findings here, and then include interpretations in the following section as “Interpretations and Implications.” You may use several sub-sections here to reflect each of the major findings of your study; in some cases, students will organize this section around the major findings as they relate to each of the research questions. Implications Type your implications content here. The implications extend the interpretations of findings to include steps for action in terms of policy, practice, or theory. In many cases, students will integrate this content into the prior section. In others, students will present this as a separate section as shown here and as organized below. Note that you should continue to draw connections to the literature in this section. Implications for Policy Type your implications for policy content here. Following the organization of each of your major findings, discuss implications for educational policy. Implications for Practice Type your implications for practice content here. Following the organization of each of your major findings, discuss implications for educational practice. 33 Implications for Theory Type your implications for theory content here. Following the organization of each of your major findings, discuss implications for educational theory—note that this is often connected to implications for future research. Implications for Future Research Type your implications for future scholarship/research content here. Following the organization of each of your major findings, discuss implications for future research. Recommendations Type the opening content for your recommendations section here. The recommendations section is similar to the implications section, but it should reflect a deeper synthesis. In the implications section, you discuss implications for each of your major findings. For the recommendations section, you step back from your study and try to review it from a more global perspective. Your goal is to answer the question, “In light of what you have learned from you review of the literature and your study’s findings, what three to five recommendations would you make for policy and practice?” Consider broader recommendations for (a) changes in theory or theoretical constructs; (b) policy at the institutional, district, state, and/or federal levels; and (c) changes in educational practice. There may be cases where you have more than five recommendations, but you should use caution in doing so—in many environments, increasing the 34 number of recommendations to a laundry list reduces the likelihood that any of them will be enacted. Further, note that you should support each of your recommendations with content from your literature review and with findings from your study. Presented below are example headings related to the development of the dissertation. As shown here, use short descriptive headings rather than labeling your recommendations numerically. Type a Heading for Your First Recommendation Here Type your content for your first recommendation here. Type a Heading for Your Second Recommendation Here Type your content for your second recommendation here. Type a Heading for Your Third Recommendation Here Type your content for your third recommendation here. Type a Heading for Your Fourth Recommendation Here Type your content for your fourth recommendation here. Copy and paste the above format for additional recommendations. Summary of the Dissertation Type your summary of the dissertation content here. It is better to be overly concise than redundant in this final conclusion. Your purpose is to review the problem, findings, and recommendations in a manner that pulls everything together and provides the reader with an appropriate send off or call to action. If you opened your dissertation with an 35 interesting quote, statistic, or story, you may return to that concept here to help you draw closure to the study. 36 REFERENCES [Note: List the references of your study here. List every source that you cited in your dissertation, but no others. If there are other sources that you wish to list that you have not cited, these should go into a separate “bibliography” section. Note also that the alphabetical listing of references should make it easy for your reader to find sources–the same names listed in citations should serve as the beginning for each of the references, thus making it easy for your reader to quickly find the appropriate source.] Creswell, J. W. (2007). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Reed, J. (2006). Appreciative inquiry: Research for change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 37 APPENDIX A APPENDIX FORMAT: THIS IS THE APPENDIX TITLE Type your appendix content here. Notice that the top margin is at the one-inch margin, rather than at two inches. Observe all other formatting restrictions apply for margins and titles. Try to use Arial 12 point font—do not use a font size smaller than Arial 8 point. The following is a list of items typically included as appendixes in a dissertation: Survey instruments Interview protocols Informed consent forms Emails, letters, posters, etc. used to recruit participants Comprehensive tables of findings when abbreviated table content is used in the dissertation 38 APPENDIX B GENERAL FORMATTING GUIDELINES The University Dissertation Manual provides the guidelines that must be followed in formatting your proposal. The summary provided here will help you to begin your work. Note that this dissertation is already set up to meet these formatting guidelines. 1. Use one side of a standard-sized 8 ½ x 11-inch paper. 2. Use 12-point Arial font. 3. Double-space and leave margins of at least 1 inch at the top, bottom, and right of every page. The dissertation requires a 1.5inch margin on the left to allow for binding. 4. Indent the first line of each paragraph 0.5 inch. 5. Use left justification and leave the right margin uneven. 6. Place use spaces after the punctuation that concludes each sentence. 7. Format the preliminary pages using lower-case Roman numerals at the bottom center of each page after the first page. Begin with ii on the second page of the preliminary pages. 8. After the preliminary pages, paginate the document sequentially in Arabic numerals (e.g., 1, 2, 3) at the top right-hand corner of each page. 39 APPENDIX C HEADINGS, SERIATION, AND BULLETED TABS APA Style Headings and Formatting (This is a Level 1 Heading) Level 1 headings are always bolded, centered, and fit within the double spacing requirements—there is no extra spacing above or below it. This first heading may begin anywhere in the chapter, but it should be preceded by an introductory paragraph. In addition to Level 1 headings, you may use the additional levels shown below. Avoid having only one subsection heading and subsection with a section, just as you would in an outline. Use at least two subsection headings within any given section, or use none (APA manual, p. 62). Do not include any additional space before or after headings. You should include all Level1 and Level 2 headings in your table of contents, but do not include content for Level 3 and above. This is a Level 2 Heading This level is a subsection of the preceding level 1 heading. All headings must be worded in the Table of Contents exactly as they are in the text. The heading should be flush left and boldface with the first letter of all major words capitalized. The text starts on the line one double space below the secondary heading and is indented. Level 2 headings for CSUF dissertations must be in the Table of Contents. Level 3 headings. Level 3 headings need not be included in the Table of Contents. If you use it, be sure you have at least one more, like all other headings. See the APA manual for further subsection instructions. The heading 40 is indented, boldface, and in lowercase type with only the first word of the heading capitalized. The text begins two spaces after a level three heading and not on the line after the heading as is the case with level one and two headings. Level 4 headings. You may occasionally need to use Level 4 headings to break up content within a Level 3 heading section. Level 4 headings are indented, boldface, italicized, and in lowercase type with only the first word of the heading capitalized. Level 5 headings. Few dissertations will require Level 5 headings. Level 5 headings are indented, italicized, and in lowercase type with only the first word of the heading capitalized. Widow and Orphan Lines A widow or orphan line occurs when there is only one line or heading at the bottom of a page. Avoid these. A slightly shorter page than the others is permissible. In your final draft, you can eliminate orphaned lined by inserted extra lines after prior paragraph. Setting Bulleted Tabs For dissertation research questions, for example, observe the following tabbed examples: 1. What is the relationship between the measures of teacher attitudes, teacher behaviors, and student outcomes? 2. How do students describe their perceptions of their teachers’ attitudes and behaviors? 41 3. In what ways do student perceptions about teacher attitudes and behaviors explain the relationships between measures teacher attitudes and behaviors with student outcome measures? Notice that the tabs align by .5-inch increments. Bulleted lists are generally discouraged in a dissertation, but should follow the same format as numbered lists if used. 42 APPENDIX D TABLES AND FIGURES Insert your table or figure after you have referenced it within the text. Notice that the table number is double spaced after the text. Decimal point data are always aligned to the decimal point, rather than centered. Table 1 Frequency of Survey Participants by Race and Gender Demographic Variable Frequency Percentage African American/Black 48 12.1 Asian/Pacific Islander 73 18.4 Caucasian/White 113 28.5 Hispanic/Latino 107 27.0 7 1.8 Multiracial 23 5.8 Other 11 2.8 Declined to State 14 3.5 Female 236 59.6 Male 160 40.4 396 100.0 Race Native American Gender Total 43 Column Heads “Stub head” column content or data for the left-hand column are generally left justified with the column head centered above the columns. Numerical data in remaining columns must align at the decimal and, if possible, carry all comparable values to the same number of decimal places. The column heads for these data should be centered above the data for the columns. APA does not require that students use double-space type throughout their tables, though the final format of tables should be clear and easy to read. For large tables, students may use Arial 10 or 11 point font, but no smaller. There are a number of additional specific rules for tables regarding notes, explanations, capitalization, and run-over lines, to name but a few. APA has many specific examples in the manual. Table Referencing All tables (and figures) should be referred to in the text, numbered consecutively (with Arabic numerals), and placed as close as possible to the original text reference. Refer to tables and figures by their number; for example, “as shown in Table 8, the response time among firefighters and police was substantially different.” All information within the table or figure should be explained before it is presented. 44 Figure 1. Dissertation formatting is exhausting. Table titles are double-spaced above the table, and figure titles can be placed immediately following the figures. Fonts for titles and data may be no smaller than 10 point. Tables and figures larger than a half a page may stand alone; otherwise, add text to fill the page. Avoid splitting tables across pages. A table or figure should be able to stand alone without any text explanation or, in some cases, sourcing. Thus, all pertinent information should be referenced within the text that precedes the table. 45 APPENDIX E CITATIONS AND QUOTATIONS You must include the author name(s) and year in every citation. The year should generally be placed immediately after the author name. Note that the purpose of the citation is to direct your reader to the appropriate source in your references. When you provide a direct quote, you must also include a page number for the citation. The page number citation should be placed immediately after the quoted material. Thus, these citations typically take one of two forms as presented in the next two sentences. Creswell and Plano Clark (2011) stated, “Mixed methods research is ‘practical’ in the sense that the researcher is free to use all methods possible to address a research problem” (p. 13). “Mixed methods research is ‘practical’ in the sense that the researcher is free to use all methods possible to address a research problem” (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2011, p. 13). Note from this example that the word “and” is spelled out in the first case, but the ampersand symbol (&) is used inside the parenthetical citation. Also, note that “double” quotation marks surround the word “practical” in the original, but only ‘single’ quotation marks are used inside the quotation. Quotations of 40 or more words should be placed into a block quotation as shown below. Block quotes should always be introduced and not presented without context. For example: When discussing the recent increase in the popularity of mixed methods research, Creswell and Plano Clark (2011) stated the following: 46 What is it about the nature of mixed methods that draws researchers to its use? Its popularity can be easily documented through journal articles, conference proceedings, books, and the formation of special interest groups (Creswell, in press-b; Plano Clark, 2010). It has been called the “third methodological movement” following the developments of first quantitative and then qualitative research (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2003a, p. 5), the “third paradigm” (Johnson & Onwuegbuzie, 2003a, 2004, p. 15), and “a new start in the social science sky” (Mayring, 2007, p. 1). Why does it merit such superlatives? One answer is that it is an intuitive way of doing research that is constantly being displayed through our everyday lives. (p. 1) The formatting of this section further demonstrates (a) the correct format for regular in-text citations as shown within the quote itself, (b) the correct format for the citation of a block quote, (c) the correct non-indented line following the block quote since this content is a part of the same paragraph as the quote, and (d) the correct format for a seriated list that does not consist of a list of full sentences. 47 APPENDIX F CUTTING AND PASTING CONTENT INTO THE DISSERTATION TEMPLATE When cutting and pasting content from another document into this dissertation template, you will need to ensure that you keep the formatting of this document. If you simply cut from another document and paste here, you will likely retain the formatting of your source document (e.g. the font, font size, spacing). In order to retain the formatting in this dissertation template, use the following steps: 1. In your original document, highlight the text that you wish to cut extending the highlight just past the period as shown in Figure 2 below. Do not extend the highlighting to the extra spaces at the end of the line as shown in Figure 3. The reason is that Microsoft Word often includes formatting code instructions in this space. Figure 2. Correct means of highlighting text to cut from your original document. 48 Figure 3. Incorrect means of highlighting text to cut from your original document. 2. After correctly highlighting the text that you wish to cut, you can either use the “cut” function in Microsoft word or the shortcut (CTRL + X). We recommend that you use the cut function rather than the copy function so that that you can keep track of the content that you have moved to this dissertation template. 3. Next, highlight the text in this dissertation template where you wish to paste your content. Follow the same conventions for highlight the text that you wish to replace as shown in Figure 4 below. Figure 4. Highlighting template text that you wish to replace. 49 4. To paste your content, use the “Merge Formatting (M)” function in Microsoft Word as shown in Figure 5 below. This will merge the content that you have cut from your prior document into the format of the dissertation template (see how the content from Figure 2 above is now has the correct font, size, margins, etc.). Note that there will be some instances when this paste option will not be available to you—it is your responsibility to ensure that whatever content you paste is formatted to fit with the guidelines presented in this template. Figure 5. Using the merge formatting function.