Chapter 8 - Ross Fuerman

advertisement

Chapter 8

Audit Sampling: An

Overview and

Application to Tests of Controls

Introduction

Auditors need to rely on sampling to some degree because it’s not always possible to analyze the entire population:

1. Many control processes require human involvement.

2. Many testing procedures require the auditor to physically examine an asset.

3. In many cases auditors are required to obtain and evaluate evidence from third parties.

LO# 1

8-2

Definitions and Key Concepts

LO# 1 and 2

On the following slides we will define:

1.

Audit Sampling.

2.

Sampling Risk.

3.

Confidence Level.

4.

Tolerable and Expected Error.

8-3

Audit Sampling

• Here are at least two ways (there are more) to define Audit Sampling:

• Analysis of part of a population, instead of the entire population

• Using inferential statistics in an audit

LO# 1

Why is this phrase “Audit Sampling” (which confuses some people) used?

Custom and tradition.

8-4

LO# 2

Sampling Risk

Sampling risk is part of inferential statistics. There are two types of sampling risk. The easy way to remember this is that

Type II risk is what can cause an audit failure because it can cause the auditor to not be effective .

Risk of incorrect rejection (Type I) – in a test of internal controls , it is the risk that the sample indicates the control is not operating effectively when, in fact, it is operating effectively. In substantive testing , it is the risk that the sample indicates that the recorded balance is materially misstated when, in fact, it is not.

Risk of incorrect acceptance (Type II) – in a test of internal controls , it is the risk that the sample indicates the control is operating effectively when, in fact, it is not operating effectively. In substantive testing , it is the risk that the sample indicates the recorded balance is correct when it is, in fact, materially misstated.

8-5

Determining the “right” sample size in attribute sampling and substantive sampling

Sampling risk is always present. The auditor must decide how much to expose himself to.

The auditor would like to avoid any significant sampling risk, but that would cost him a huge amount of time and effort

– He’d have to draw huge samples

– He’d lose the benefit of small samples

– Bottom line: this is a cost/benefit decision

LO# 2

Factors to Determine right Sample Size in Attribute

(ACL calls it “Record”) Sampling

1.Confidence level or risk of incorrect acceptance

ACL calls this “Confidence”

2.Tolerable deviation rate

ACL calls this “Upper Error Limit %”

3.Expected population deviation rate

ACL calls this “Expected Error Rate %”

8-7

Evaluation of Results of Attribute (“Record” in

ACL) Sampling

Desired Confidence Level

– ACL calls this “Confidence”

Sample Size

– ACL calls this “Sample Size”

Number of Deviations Found

– ACL calls this “Number of Errors”

Computed Upper Deviation Rate

– ACL: “Upper Error Limit Frequency”

Confidence Level

Confidence level is the complement of sampling risk.

5%

risk of incorrect acceptance means the same thing as confidence level of

95%

.

LO# 2

8-9

Sampling Situations

Inspection of tangible assets . Auditors typically attend the client ’ s year-end inventory count. When there are a large number of items in inventory, the auditor will select a sample to physically inspect and count.

Inspection of records or documents .

Certain controls may require the matching of documents. The procedure may take place many times a day. The auditor may gather evidence on the effectiveness of the control by testing a sample of the document packages.

LO# 3

8-10

LO# 3

More Sampling Situations

 Reperformance .

To comply with PCAOB standards, publicly traded clients must document and test controls over important assertions for significant accounts. The auditor may reperform a sample of the tests performed by the client.

 Confirmation .

Rather than confirm all customer account receivable balances, the auditor may select a sample of customers.

8-11

Testing All Items or All Items that

LO# 3

are Very Large

When an account or class of transactions is made up of a few large items , the auditor may examine all the items in the account or class of transaction.

When a small number of large transactions make up a relatively large percent of an account or class of transactions, auditors will typically test all the transactions greater than a particular dollar amount.

Statisticians call this “Stratification”

8-12

One Way to Categorize Types of Audit

Sampling

LO# 4

Statistical sampling versus nonstatistical sampling.

Statistical sampling uses the laws of probability to

1) compute sample size and

2) evaluate results.

In nonstatistical sampling, the auditor does not use the laws of probability in one or both of these tasks

8-13

Statistical Sampling

Advantages of statistical sampling:

1.

Design most efficient sample.

2.

Measure the sufficiency of evidence obtained.

3.

Quantify sampling risk.

Disadvantage of statistical sampling:

It has been found in litigation for it to be harder for the

CPA firm to defend itself, if it used statistical sampling rather than nonstatistical sampling.

LO# 4

8-14

Statistical Sampling Techniques

LO# 4

1.Attribute Sampling (used to test IC operating effectiveness – Ch. 8).

2.Monetary-Unit Sampling (used to decide if auditor can accept as materially correct $$ in a Balance

Sheet or IS account – Ch. 9).

3.Classical Variables Sampling (also

Ch. 9)

Attribute Sampling Applied to

Tests of Controls

LO#

5, 6, & 7

Plan

In conducting a statistical sample for a test of controls, auditing standards require the auditor to properly plan , perform , and evaluate the sampling application and to adequately document each phase of the sampling application.

Perform Evaluate Document

8-16

Planning

Planning

1. Determine the test objectives.

2. Define the population characteristics:

• Define the sampling population.

• Define the sampling unit.

• Define the control deviation conditions.

3. Determine the sample size, using the following inputs:

• The desired confidence level or risk of incorrect acceptance.

• The tolerable deviation rate.

• The expected population deviation rate.

LO#

5, 6, & 7

The objective of attribute sampling when used for tests of controls is to evaluate the operating effectiveness of the internal control.

8-17

Planning

Planning

2. Define the population characteristics:

• Define the sampling population.

• Define the sampling unit.

• Define the control deviation conditions.

3. Determine the sample size, using the following inputs:

• The desired confidence level or risk of incorrect acceptance.

• The tolerable deviation rate.

• The expected population deviation rate.

LO#

5, 6, & 7

All of the items that constitute the class of transactions make up the sampling population.

8-18

LO#

5, 6, & 7

Planning

Planning

2. Define the population characteristics:

• Define the sampling population.

• Define the sampling unit.

• Define the control deviation conditions.

3. Determine the sample size, using the following inputs:

• The desired confidence level or risk of incorrect acceptance.

• The tolerable deviation rate.

• The expected population deviation rate.

Each sampling unit makes up one item in the population. The sampling unit will vary depending on the specific control being tested.

Often the sampling unit is the document or documents that provide support for the IC procedure having been performed properly.

8-19

Planning

Planning

2. Define the population characteristics:

• Define the sampling population.

• Define the sampling unit.

• Define the control deviation conditions.

3. Determine the sample size, using the following inputs:

• The desired confidence level or risk of incorrect acceptance.

• The tolerable deviation rate.

• The expected population deviation rate.

LO#

5, 6, & 7

A deviation is a departure from adequate performance of the internal control.

8-20

Planning

Planning

3. Determine the sample size, using the following inputs:

• The desired confidence level or risk of incorrect acceptance.

• The tolerable deviation rate.

• The expected population deviation rate.

LO#

5, 6, & 7

Confidence level is the level of assurance that the sample results support a conclusion that the control is functioning effectively. When the auditor has decided to rely on controls, the confidence level is traditionally set at 90% or

95%. This is another way of saying that the auditor takes a 10% or 5% risk of accepting the control as effective when it is not effective.

8-21

Planning

Planning

3. Determine the sample size, using the following inputs:

• The desired confidence level or risk of incorrect acceptance.

• The tolerable deviation rate.

• The expected population deviation rate.

LO#

5, 6, & 7

The tolerable deviation rate is the maximum deviation rate from a prescribed control that the auditor is willing to accept and still consider the control effective.

Example Suggested Tolerable Deviation Rates:

Assessed Importance of a

Control

Highly important

Tolerable

Deviation

Rate

3–5%

Moderately important 6–10%

8-22

LO#

5, 6, & 7

Planning

Planning

3. Determine the sample size, using the following inputs:

• The desired confidence level or risk of incorrect acceptance.

• The tolerable deviation rate.

• The expected population deviation rate.

The expected population deviation rate is the rate the auditor expects to exist in the population. The larger the expected population deviation rate, the larger the sample size must be, all else equal.

EXAMPLE: Assume a desired confidence level of

95%, and a large population, the effect of the expected population deviation rate on sample size is shown right:

Expected Population

Deviation Rate

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

3.0%

Sample

Size

93

124

181

‡ Sample size too large to be cost-effective.

8-23

Population Size: Attributes

Sampling

LO#

5, 6, & 7

Population size is not often important in determining sample sizes for attributes sampling, so we ignore it in this course. Below are shown the 3 factors that always matter.

Factor

Desired confidence level

Tolerable deviation rate

Expected population deviation rate

Relationship to

Sample Size

Direct

Inverse

Direct

Examples

Change in Effect on

Factor

Lower

Higher

Sample Size

Decrease

Increase

Lower

Higher

Lower

Higher

Increase

Decrease

Decrease

Increase

8-24

Performance

Performance and Evaluation

4. Select sample items:

• Random-Number Selection.

5. Perform the Audit Procedures:

• Voided documents.

• Unused or inapplicable documents.

• Inability to examine a sample item.

• Stopping the test before completion.

6. Calculate the Sample Deviation and Upper Deviation Rates.

7. Draw Final Conclusions.

LO#

5, 6, & 7

This is the preferred method. Every item in the population has the same probability of being selected as every other item.

8-25

Performance

Performance and Evaluation

5. Perform the Audit Procedures:

• Voided documents.

• Unused or inapplicable documents.

• Inability to examine a sample item.

• Stopping the test before completion.

6. Calculate the Sample Deviation and Upper Deviation Rates.

7. Draw Final Conclusions.

LO#

5, 6, & 7

For example, assume a sales invoice should not be prepared unless there is a related shipping document. If the shipping document is present, there is evidence the control is working properly. If the shipping document is not present, a control deviation exists.

8-26

Performance

Performance and Evaluation

5. Perform the Audit Procedures:

• Voided documents.

• Unused or inapplicable documents.

• Inability to examine a sample item.

• Stopping the test before completion.

6. Calculate the Sample Deviation and Upper Deviation Rates.

7. Draw Final Conclusions.

LO#

5, 6, & 7

Usually the auditor replaces them with a new sample item.

8-27

Performance

Performance and Evaluation

5. Perform the Audit Procedures:

• Voided documents.

• Unused or inapplicable documents.

• Inability to examine a sample item.

• Stopping the test before completion.

6. Calculate the Sample Deviation and Upper Deviation Rates.

7. Draw Final Conclusions.

LO#

5, 6, & 7

If the auditor is unable to examine a document usually the auditor calls this a deviation for purposes of evaluating the sample results.

8-28

Performance

Performance and Evaluation

5. Perform the Audit Procedures:

• Voided documents.

• Unused or inapplicable documents.

• Inability to examine a sample item.

• Stopping the test before completion.

6. Calculate the Sample Deviation and Upper Deviation Rates.

7. Draw Final Conclusions.

LO#

5, 6, & 7

If a large number of deviations are detected early, the auditor may as well stop the test, if it is clear the results of the test will not support the planned assessed level of control risk.

8-29

LO#

5, 6, & 7

Evaluation

Evaluation

6. Calculate the Computed Upper Deviation Rate.

7. Draw Final Conclusions.

The auditor summarizes the deviations and evaluates the results. For example, if the auditor discovered two deviations in a sample of 50, the sample deviation rate is 4% (2 ÷ 50).

But what matters for making a decision is the computed upper deviation rate (CUDR), the sum of the sample deviation rate plus an allowance for sampling risk. You get this from

ACL or text Table 8-8 on page 292.

8-30

Evaluation

Evaluation

6. Calculate the Sample Deviation and Upper Deviation Rates.

7. Make a decision.

LO#

5, 6, & 7

The auditor compares the computed upper deviation rate (CUDR) to the tolerable deviation rate (TDR).

If the CUDR > TDR the results indicate IC is not as effective as planned and cannot be relied upon to the extent planned.

If the CUDR <= TDR the results indicate IC is as effective as planned and can be relied upon to the extent planned.

8-31

Attribute Sampling Example

LO#

5, 6, & 7

The auditor has decided to test a control at Calabro

Wireless Services. The test is to determine that the sales and service contracts are properly authorized for credit approval. A deviation in this test is defined as the failure of the credit department personnel to follow proper credit approval procedures for new and existing customers. Here is information relating to the test:

Desired confidence level

Tolerable deviation rate

95%

6%

Expected population deviation rate 1%

Sample size 78

8-32

LO#

Attribute Sampling Example

Part of the table used to determine sample size when the auditor specifies a 95% desired confidence level.

5, 6, & 7

If there are 125,000 items in the population numbered from 1 to 125,000, the auditor can use Excel to generate random selections from the population for testing.

8-33

Attribute Sampling Example

LO#

5, 6, & 7

The auditor examines each selected contract for credit approval and determines the following:

Number of deviations

Sample size

Sample deviation rate

Computed upper deviation rate

Tolerable deviation rate

2

78

2.6%

8.2%

6.0%

Let ’ s see how we get the computed upper deviation rate.

8-34

Attribute Sampling Example

LO#

5, 6, & 7

Part of the table used to determine the computed upper deviation rate at 95% desired confidence level:

Sample

Size

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

Actual Number of Deviations Found

0 1 2 3

11.3

9.5

17.6

14.9

-

19.6

-

-

8.3

7.3

6.5

5.9

12.9

11.4

10.2

9.2

17.0

15.0

13.4

12.1

-

18.3

16.4

14.8

5.4

4.9

4.6

4.2

4.0

3.7

8.4

7.7

7.1

6.6

6.2

5.8

11.1

10.2

9.4

8.8

8.2

7.7

13.5

12.5

11.5

10.8

10.1

9.5

8-35

Attribute Sampling Example

LO#

5, 6, & 7

Computed

Upper Deviation

Rate (8.2%)

>

Tolerable Deviation

Rate (6%)

Auditor ’ s Decision:

Does not support reliance on the control.

8-36

End of Chapter 8

8-37

Download