MBCx Projects – Programs, Process, and Results Soda, Tan, Shields and Wurster David Jump, Ph.D., P.E., Matt Denny, P.E. Quantum Energy Services & Technologies, Inc. Arch 249X: The Secret Life of Buildings, Oct. 2008 Overview This presentation will discuss: Process and Benefits of Monitoring-Based Commissioning • Differences with RCx Integration of M&V in RCx Results from 3 Buildings Progress on Wurster Discussion 2 Monitoring-Based Commissioning (MBCx) • Third-Party Energy Efficiency Partnership Program Funded by public goods charges under auspices of CPUC Available to University of California and California State University Campuses • One of multiple RCx programs in California: PG&E Core RCx Program PG&E RCx Services and Incentives Program SCE RCx Program SCE/LA County RCx Partnership (LA County buildings only) San Diego RCx Program 3 MBCx Project Scope RCx Process • Planning Phase Initial site visit Review documentation Identify project requirements Provide commissioning plan • Investigation Phase Inventory equipment Calibrate sensors, conduct PM activities Develop and carry out functional tests Identify operational deficiencies Additional MBCx Elements • Planning Phase Develop M&V Plan (IPMVP or ASHRAE 14) Add energy metering • electric interval, gas pulse, steam, etc. • systems level (e.g. chillers, AHU, etc.) • Investigation Phase Begin monitoring • Energy • Independent variables (OAT, etc.) Develop Baseline energy model Document costs and benefits to correct deficiencies • Implementation Phase Install and commission measures Document improved performance • Hand-off Phase Provide final report Provide training • Implementation Phase Collect post-installation data Develop post-installation model Determine Savings • Hand-off Phase Establish energy tracking system Provide periodic savings reports Address deficient performance 4 Approach Gas Meter Hot Water Plant Chilled Water Plant MCC DHW • Select measurement boundary VSD Air Handling Unit VSD L P Men • Option C - Whole Building Women L • Option B: Retrofit Isolation (HVAC Systems) P L P L kWh Meter P Lighting and Plug Load 5 Approach CW Pump Cooling Tower SCHW Pumps • Defining Systems - by ‘Services’ provided Chiller PCHW Pump Chilled water system: • Chiller, CHW pumps, etc. Air handling system: • Supply fan, return fan, exhaust fan VSD Hot water system: • Boiler, HW pumps VSD Boiler VSD 6 CHW Three Case Studies • UC Berkeley Soda Hall – Computer Science Building, 109,000 ft2 Tan Hall – Chemistry Building (100% OA), 106,000 ft2 • UC Davis Shields Library – main undergraduate library, 400,070 ft2 7 Soda Hall • UC Berkeley’s Computer Science Department (24/7 operation) • 109,000 ft2 • Central Plant (2 - 215 ton chillers & associated equipment) • Steam to hot water heating • 3 Main VAV AHUs, AHU1 serves building core, AHUs 3 and 4 serve the perimeter, with hot water reheat 8 Soda Hall RCx Findings Savings System Measure No. Description AHU-1 AHU1-2 Resume supply air temperature reset control and return economizer to normal operation AHU1-3 Repair/replace VFDs in return fans AHU1-4 Reduce high minimum VAV box damper position AHU3-2 & AHU4-2 AHUs 3 & 4 AHU3-3 & AHU4-3 Option 2: Reduce high minimum VAV box damper position Re-establish scheduled fan operation and VAV AHU-3 (includes repair/replace VFD on return fan EF-17), AHU-4 (includes repair/replace VFDs on supply SF18 and return EF-19 fans, and elimination of low VFD speed setting during the day) Implementation Date Energy, kWh/yr Energy, lbs/yr Dollars, $/yr Cost, $ Payback, yr 10/25/2006 129,800 266,250 $19,004 $1,550 0.1 10/25/2006 34,308 $4,460 $7,000 1.6 3/9/2006 46,300 119,300 $6,973 $15,250 2.2 3/9/2006 30,600 2,328,100 $22,603 $17,250 0.8 10/25/2006 242,000 $31,460 $14,000 0.4 $55,050 0.7 Total Percentage Savings Utility Data 483,008 2,713,650 $84,500 10% 51% 14% Steam Electricity Cost 9 5,325,717 4,871,678 $621,575 lbs kWhr M&V Approach for Soda Hall • Assessment: Whole-building electric and steam meters present EMS that trends all points at 1 min (COV) intervals 8-month history of data RCx measures in AHU and Chilled Water Systems • Electric and steam savings Very high EUI – unsure if can discern savings at whole building level • M&V Approach: Option B – applied at systems level (electric only) Option C – whole building level (electric and steam) 10 Soda Hall Affected Systems System Equipment Whole Building Main Electric Meters (2) Main Steam Meters (2) Chilled Water System Chillers 1 and 2 Primary Chilled Water Pumps P-5, P-6 Secondary Chilled Water Pumps, P-3, P-4 Condenser Water System Cooling Towers Condenser Water Pumps P-7, P-8 Air Distribution System AHU-1, SF-11, EF-12, EF-13 AHU-2, SF-14, EF-15 AHU-3, SF-16, SF-17 AHU-4, SF-18, SF-19 AHU-5, SF-20 Chiller Room Fans Chiller Room 181, SF-2, EF-2 Chiller Room 179, SF-3A, SF-3B, EF-1A, EF-1B Affected by ECM? X Available Points kW lb X kW Status VFD speed X High/Low Status Status X VFD speed Status VFD speed VFD speed Status Status Status AC Units Condenser Water Pumps P-9, P-10 AC-31 through AC-41 Hot Water System Hot Water Pumps P-1, P-2 11 VFD speed Status X VFD Speed Define the Baseline Period & Collect Data • 8 months of trended data collected • Baseline period selected to cover widest range of operating conditions ~ 3 months. • Energy use for each system to be totaled each day Basis for analysis and reporting • “Proxy” Variables on EMCS: Constant load equipment: measure operating kW • Equipment status becomes proxy for kW Variable load equipment: log kW and VFD speed • VFD speed signal becomes proxy for kW 12 “Proxy” Variable: VFD speed for kW 35 AHU-1 Fan kW 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 20 40 60 80 AHU-1 Fan Speed % Actual 13 Cubic polynomial 100 120 Baseline Model: Soda Hall • Total Building Electric Building Steam • Peak Period Electric HVAC System Electric 14 9/ 2 00 6 2/ 20 0 13 6 /2 00 2/ 15 6 /2 00 2/ 17 6 /2 00 2/ 19 6 /2 00 2/ 21 6 /2 00 2/ 23 6 /2 00 2/ 25 6 /2 00 2/ 27 6 /2 00 6 3/ 1/ 20 06 3/ 3/ 20 06 3/ 5/ 20 06 3/ 7/ 20 10 06 /3 1/ 20 06 11 /2 /2 00 11 6 /4 /2 00 11 6 /6 /2 00 11 6 /8 /2 00 11 6 /1 0/ 20 11 06 /1 2/ 20 11 06 /1 4/ 20 11 06 /1 6/ 20 11 06 /1 8/ 20 11 06 /2 0/ 20 11 06 /2 2/ 20 11 06 /2 4/ 20 11 06 /2 6/ 20 11 06 /2 8/ 20 06 11 / 2/ 2/ Daily kWh Use Soda Hall M&V: HVAC Systems 4,500 4,000 Baseline Model: kWh = 79.9*OAT + 1129 RMSE = 136 kWh Date Break HVAC Daily kWh Usage Post-Install Model: kWh = 44.1*OAT - 336 RMSE = 213 kWh 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 Baseline Period Post-Installation Period 500 0 Date Baseline 15 Post-Install Model Soda Hall: Estimated vs. Verified Savings Source kWh kW Lbs. Steam Verified Savings** Estimated Savings* Whole Building HVAC System 483,008 2,713,650 216,716 22 854,407 462,472 50 * based on eQUEST model ** based on baseline and post-installation measurements and TMY OAT data 16 Tan Hall • UC Berkeley’s Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Departments • 106,000 ft2 • Central Plant (475 ton chiller & associated equipment) • Steam heating • 1 Main 100% outside air VAV AHU 4 100-HP Supply Fans 4 60-HP Exhaust Fans 17 Tan Hall RCx Findings Savings System Chilled Water AHU-3 Measure No. Energy, kWh/yr Description CHW-1 & CW-1 Eliminate simultaneous chilled water pump and condenser water pump operation CH-5 Chiller outside air lockout temperature set point not operating CH-6 AHU3-4 Peak Energy, lbs/yr Demand, Dollars, $/yr kW Cost, $ Payback , yr 68,849 - 33.3 $9,639 $2,900 0.3 361,184 - 0.5 $29,046 $0 - Chiller outside air lockout temperature and Sat set point change 119,767 - 8.3 $16,767 $0 - Eliminate simultaneous heating and cooling 103,775 10,543,991 48.8 $98,880 653,575 10,543,991 90.8 $154,332 $2,900 0.0 14% 62% Total Percentage Savings 19% Utility Data Gas Electricity 17,139,542 4,720,647 lbs kWhr $798,007 18 M&V Approach for Tan Hall • Assessment: Whole-building electric and steam meters present EMS that trends all points at 1 min (COV) intervals 8-month history of data RCx measures in Chilled Water System and main AHU • Electric and steam savings • M&V Approach: Option B – applied at systems level (electric only) Option C – whole building level (electric and steam) 19 Tan Hall Affected Systems System Equipment Whole Building Main 480/277 Electric Meter Main 220/110 Electric Meter Main Steam Meter Chilled Water System Chiller (VS) Primary Chilled Water Pumps CHWP-1, CHWP-2 (CS) Condenser Water System Condenser Water Pumps CDWP-1, CDWP-2 (CS) Cooling Tower (CS, 2-speed) AHU-3 AHU-3 Supply Fans SF-1, SF-2, SF-3, SF-4 (CS) AHU-3 Exhaust Fans EF-1, EF-2, EF-3, EF-4 (CS) Terminal Boxes and Fume Hoods associated with AHU-3 AHU-1 AHU-1 Chemical Storage AH-1, SE-1 AHU-2 AHU-2 Chemical Storage AH-2, SE-2 Heating Water System Heat Exchanger HWC-1 Hot Water Pumps HHWP-1, HHWP-2 Lighting System Lighting Circuits Plug Loads Plug Load Circuits Domestic Water Domestic Water Pumps 20 Affected by ECM? X Available Points kW kW lbs/hr X kW Status X Status Not Avail. X S/S & Speed S/S & Speed NA Status Status X Status NA NA NA M&V Models: Tan Hall Whole Building Electric Whole Building Steam Peak Period Electric Chilled Water System Electric 21 Tan Hall M&V: Whole-Building Electric 25,000 80 Baseline Model R2 = 0.75 RMSE = 581 kWh New Baseline R2 = 0.88 RMSE = 438 kWh 70 20,000 50 15,000 40 10,000 Deg. F Daily kWh 60 30 20 5,000 10 0 0 6/1/2006 6/3/2006 6/5/2006 6/7/2006 6/9/2006 6/11/2006 6/13/2006 6/15/2006 6/17/2006 6/19/2006 6/21/2006 6/23/2006 6/25/2006 Date Total Building Daily kWh Average Daily Outside Air Temperature 22 Baseline New Baseline Tan Hall M&V: Whole-Building Steam 90,000 80 Baseline Model 80,000 70 70,000 60 New Baseline Daily Steam lbs 60,000 50,000 40 40,000 Deg. F 50 30 30,000 20 20,000 10 10,000 0 0 6/1/2006 6/3/2006 6/5/2006 6/7/2006 6/9/2006 6/11/2006 6/13/2006 6/15/2006 6/17/2006 6/19/2006 6/21/2006 6/23/2006 6/25/2006 Date Steam Baseline New Baseline 23 Average Daily Outside Air Temperature Tan Hall M&V: Chilled Water System 6,000 80 Baseline Model R2 = 0.87 RMSE = 486 kWh 70 5,000 60 New Baseline R2 = 0.95 RMSE = 251 kWh 50 3,000 40 Deg. F Daily kWh 4,000 30 2,000 20 1,000 10 0 0 6/1/2006 6/3/2006 6/5/2006 6/7/2006 6/9/2006 6/11/2006 6/13/2006 6/15/2006 6/17/2006 6/19/2006 6/21/2006 6/23/2006 6/25/2006 Date Chilled Water System Average Daily Outside Air Temperature 24 Baseline New Baseline Tan Hall: Estimated vs. Verified Savings Source kWh kW Lbs. Steam Verified Savings** Estimated Savings* Whole Building CHW System 653,575 91 10,543,991 663,184 69 5,995,232 686,519 * based on engineering calculations ** based on baseline and post-installation measurements and TMY OAT data 25 Shields Library • UC Davis Undergraduate Library • 400,072 ft2 • Chilled Water and Steam provided by campus central plant 2 CHW service entrances, variable volume 2 HW service entrances • 11 AHU, 3 VAV, 8 CAV • 5 electric meters 26 Shields Library RCx Findings System AC01 & AC02 Description of Deficiencies/Findings • Excessive fan speed due to failure to meet static pressure set point • Economizer malfunction • Simultaneous heating and cooling in air stream AC21, AC25, AC25, AC51, AC53, AC54, AH1, AH2, AH3 • Economizer Repair • Economizer Control Optimization • Supply Air Temperature Reset with Occupancy Schedule CHW & HW Pumps • Chilled water supply temp set point reset • Chilled water pump lockout • Reset CHW EOL pressure set point • Savings: no estimates prior to measure implementation 27 M&V Approach for Shields Library • Assessment: Whole-building meters present: • 5 electric meters • 2 CHW meters (installed as part of project) • 3 HW meters (installed as part of project) EMS that trends all points at 5 min intervals RCx measures in AHU, CHW and HW pumps • Electric, chilled water, and hot water savings • M&V Approach: Option C – whole building level 28 Shields Library: M&V Models Electric Chilled Water 500 8,000 450 7,000 400 Tons Per Day 350 5,000 4,000 3,000 300 250 200 150 2,000 100 1,000 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 40 80 50 60 70 Baseline Model Baseline Data Post Model EXP CHW Post Data EXP CHW Model 800 700 Steam 80 90 100 OAT (Deg F) OAT 600 MBTU per Day Daily kWh Use 6,000 500 400 300 200 100 0 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 OAT (Deg F) HHW HHW Model 29 HHW Post HHW Post Model 110 Post EXP CHW Post EXP CHW Model 110 20 1/ 07 7/ 2 1/ 00 10 7 /2 1/ 00 13 7 /2 1/ 00 16 7 /2 1/ 00 19 7 /2 1/ 00 22 7 /2 1/ 00 25 7 /2 1/ 00 28 7 /2 1/ 00 31 7 /2 0 2/ 07 3/ 20 4/ 07 1/ 20 4/ 07 4/ 20 4/ 07 7/ 2 4/ 00 10 7 /2 4/ 00 13 7 /2 4/ 00 16 7 /2 4/ 00 19 7 /2 4/ 00 22 7 /2 4/ 00 25 7 /2 4/ 00 28 7 /2 0 5/ 07 1/ 20 5/ 07 4/ 20 5/ 07 7/ 2 5/ 00 10 7 /2 5/ 00 13 7 /2 5/ 00 16 7 /2 5/ 00 19 7 /2 00 7 1/ 4/ Daily kWh Use Shields Library: 480V Electric Meter Savings 8,000 Baseline Model: R2 = .7 RMSE = 10% 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 Baseline Period Post-Installation Period 0 Date Daily kWh Usage 30 Date Break Baseline 8/ 11 8/ /20 12 07 8/ /20 13 07 8/ /20 14 07 8/ /20 15 07 8/ /20 16 07 8/ /20 17 07 8/ /20 18 07 8/ /20 19 07 8/ /20 20 07 8/ /20 21 07 8/ /20 22 07 8/ /20 23 07 8/ /20 24 07 8/ /20 25 07 8/ /20 26 07 8/ /20 27 07 8/ /20 28 07 8/ /20 29 07 /2 9/ 00 6/ 7 2 9/ 00 7/ 7 2 9/ 00 10 8/2 7 /2 00 10 4/2 7 /2 00 10 5/2 7 /2 00 10 6/2 7 /2 00 10 7/2 7 /2 00 10 8/2 7 /2 00 9 7 11 /20 /1 07 11 /20 /2 07 11 /20 /3 07 11 /20 /4 07 11 /20 /5 07 11 /20 /6 07 /2 00 7 Daily CHW Use (Ton-hrs) Shields Library: Chilled Water Savings 7,000 6,000 5,000 1,000 Baseline Model: R2 = .8 RMSE = 26% 4,000 3,000 2,000 Baseline Period Post-Installation Period 0 Date Daily CHW Usage 31 Date Break Baseline Daily HW Usage 32 Date Baseline Date Break 11/6/2007 11/5/2007 11/4/2007 11/3/2007 11/2/2007 11/1/2007 16,000 10/29/2007 10/28/2007 10/27/2007 10/26/2007 10/25/2007 10/24/2007 9/8/2007 9/7/2007 9/6/2007 8/29/2007 8/28/2007 8/27/2007 8/26/2007 8/25/2007 8/24/2007 8/23/2007 8/22/2007 8/21/2007 8/20/2007 8/19/2007 8/18/2007 8/17/2007 8/16/2007 8/15/2007 8/14/2007 8/13/2007 8/12/2007 8/11/2007 8/10/2007 Daily HW Use (MBH) Shields Library: Hot Water Savings 18,000 Baseline Model: R2 = .7 RMSE = 5% 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 Baseline Period Post-Installation Period 0 Costs Metering Costs Soda Hall $ 4,442 Tan Hall $ 22,573 Shields Library $ 26,000 Building MBCx Agent Costs $ 62,160 $ 53,000 $ 96,795 In-House Costs $ 51,087 $ 15,300 $ 57,757 Total $ $ $ • Including all costs, project remains cost-effective: Soda Hall: 1.7 year payback Tan Hall: 0.7 year payback Shields Library: 1.0 year payback • Added costs of metering hardware and software did not overburden project’s costs • In private sector – metering costs lower Existing electric meters Sophisticated BAS systems MBCx approach should be viable 33 117,689 90,873 180,552