Motivational Interviewing With Co-Occurring Adolescents: An Introduction Michael Fox PCC LCDC III Center for Innovative Practices The Begun Center for Violence Prevention Research & Education 98 Years of Leadership in Social Justice ˌmō-tə-ˈvā-shən The process that initiates, guides and sustains goal directed actions/behaviors -psychology.about.com To provide with a motive: impel -merriam-webster.com Positivemindwealth.com © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Ad·o·les·cence \ˌa-də-ˈle-sən(t)s\ 1: the state or process of growing up 2: the period of life from puberty to maturity terminating legally at the age of majority 3: a stage of development (as of a language or culture) prior to maturity Merriam-Webster.com “At no other time except infancy do human beings pack so much development into such a short period.” McNeely and Blanchard p. 1 © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Adolescents Adults • Adolescents are not ‘little adults’ • Teens – especially ones mandated to treatment – are frequently viewed as less competent thinkers: compared to adults – “he just doesn’t care…” – “she doesn’t get it…” • Adolescence is a time of significant developmental (potential) maturation © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Developmental Theories • Piaget – Concrete Operational to Formal Operational -short-term goals -concrete discussions -longer-term goals -abstract discussions about change • Erikson – Industry v. Inferiority – Identity v. Role Confusion – Intimacy v. Isolation © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by 6 to 11 years 12 to 18 years Young Adults Brain Triadic Model Ersnt, Romeo and Andersen (2009) Prefrontal Cortex (Modulation) interaction Striatum Amygdala (Approach) (Avoidance) Implications for risk-taking • Prefrontal Cortex: selfmonitoring and inhibitory • Amygdala: conditioned fear and avoidance • Striatum (includes nucleus accumbens): motivation and incentive Adolescents appear to weigh risk more heavily toward reward and discount loss – riskier choices © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Motivational Interviewing • Bill Miller developed a protocol combining Behavior Therapy techniques with a Rogerian, Client-Centered approach: noted success related purely to empathetic delivery. • Began to formalize his approach demonstrating skills to a group of psychology students in Norway • Operationalized these ideas and published Motivational Interviewing with Problem Drinkers in the British journal Behavioral Psychotherapy in 1983 © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Transtheoretical Model • • • • • Core Constructs Stages of Change: temporal dimension Process of Change: covert and overt activities applied to progress toward change Decisional Balance: weighing pros and cons of change (and not changing) Self-Efficacy: situation-specific confidence Temptation: urge(s) to engage in specific behavior(s) Prochaska and Velicer © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Stages of Change Precontemplation Maintenance Contemplation Action Preparation © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Precontemplation • • • • Not acknowledging there is a problem Not interested in change Tend to defend the status quo May grow quite defensive when confronted about their ‘bad habit’ • Old language labeled this as ‘denial’ (not just a river…), resistant or not motivated • Ignorance is bliss… • Adapted from NIMH, CDC and addictioninfo.org and Prochaska & Velicer © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Contemplation • Person starts to acknowledge their behavior(s) are problematic • Struggles greatly with ambivalence • May start to think about the possibility of change: but little to no movement is made toward change at this point • Weighing pros and cons – in both directions © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Preparation • The person has made a decision about making a change – and may attempt tentative steps toward implementing change • May make statements like, “I know I’ve got to change; things can’t go on like this” • Can be a ‘research stage’ – the person starts gathering information about what change might entail • Adapted from addictioninfo.org; SAMHSA © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Action • Change is under way: the person is taking action toward implementing plans • May rely heavily on willpower • May also be more willing to accept more help Adapted from SAMHSA and addictioninfo.org © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Maintenance • The behavior change is integrated into everyday life: the change is not so much a primary focus • This stage can be followed by Relapse: and the cycle can repeat – Relapse is not a ‘stage’, but a “…return from action or maintenance to an earlier stage” (Prochaska & Velicer) © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Application: Stages of Change Of 7 Critical Assumptions noted by Prochaska and Velicer, three seem especially pertinent to the Adolescent Co-Occurring population: (4) Without planned interventions, populations will remain stuck in the early stages. There is no inherent motivation to progress through the stages… © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Application: Stages of Change (5) The majority of at-risk populations are not prepared for action and will not be served by traditional action-oriented prevention programs. (6) Specific processes and principles of change need to be applied at specific stages if progress through the stages is to occur. In the stage paradigm, intervention programs are matched to each individual’s stage of change. © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by What is MI? Classic definition Motivational Interviewing is a collaborative, personcentered form of guiding to elicit and strengthen motivation for change Miller and Rollnick, 2009 Essential Elements Motivational Interviewing is: • a particular kind of conversation about change • collaborative • evocative Miller and Rollnick, Stockholm 2010 © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by MI Definitions • Layperson’s: (What is it for?) • Pragmatic Practitioner (Why would I use it?) Motivational Interviewing is a collaborative conversation to strengthen a person’s own motivation for and commitment to change. Motivational Interviewing is a person‐centered counseling method for addressing the common problem of ambivalence about change. Definitions from: Miller and Rollnick, Stockholm 2010 © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by MI: Final Definition • The Technical Therapeutic Definition (How does it work?) Motivational Interviewing is a collaborative, goal-oriented method of communication with particular attention to the language of change. It is designed to strengthen an individual’s motivation for and movement toward a specific goal by eliciting and exploring the person’s own arguments for change. Synopsis: Client-centered but directive method for helping people resolve ambivalence and move toward healthy change © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Learning MI Collaboration: between therapist and client Collaboration Evocation: drawing out the client’s ideas about change Spirit of MI Autonomy Autonomy: of the client © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Evocation MI Spirit • Assumes that people “possess substantial personal expertise and wisdom regarding themselves and tend to develop in a positive direction if given proper conditions of support” (Miller and Moyers, 2006) • Attainment of this spirit is not viewed as prerequisite for beginning MI – but rather it develops as a result of practicing it © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Guiding the Spirit: Principles 1. Express Empathy: empathy, very simply, is ‘seeing the world through the eyes of the client’ or a vicarious experiencing of another’s thoughts, feelings and experiences Expressing this understanding is the basis for the client to be heard and understood: building opportunity for more honest expression -How vital is this to an adolescent? © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Empathy: Adolescents Internal Growing independence from parents External Expectations from family, school, society… © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Principles of MI 1. Express Empathy 2. Develop Discrepancy: a discrepancy is a disagreement – here, a disagreement between where the adolescent is and where he/she wants to be Best when the discrepancy is between the young person’s values/goals and current real behaviors Adapted from motivationalinterview.org and Naar-King & Suarez © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Discrepancy: Adolescents Adolescents have a great deal of pressure externally regarding change: they will occasionally ‘accept’ these expectations. Externally motivated change is less stable and more inconsistent over time (Naar-King & Suarez, 2012) The adolescent should identify reasons for change: not the clinician (easy to say: difficult to practice) © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Principles of MI 1. Express Empathy 2. Develop Discrepancy 3. Roll with Resistance: viewed as an interpersonal process between the client and the therapist: the client is experiencing a conflict between their view of the ‘problem (or solution)’ and the therapist’s view: may be a sign the client is interpreting a potential loss of freedom or control © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Resistance: Adolescents (Synonyms?) Resistance: do you fight against it – try to paddle upstream – or do you ‘go with the flow’ and try to provide direction? Moyers & Rollnick, 2002 Clinician task • Don’t ‘paddle upstream’ • Avoiding confrontation – rolling with resistance – disrupts any struggle • Resistance is a cue to ‘try something different’ • ‘Dance, don’t wrestle’ • Confronted resistance provides opportunities for the adolescent to argue for value of not changing kayakclinic.com © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Principles of MI 1. 2. 3. 4. Express Empathy Develop Discrepancy Roll with Resistance Support Self-Efficacy: a strengths-based approach that believes clients posses the power of change. Self-efficacy is the client’s belief they can change – change won’t happen without this belief © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Self-Efficacy: Adolescents Adolescents – especially ones in treatment – will often see themselves as ‘falling short’ of the expectations of those around them (parents, courts, schools, police…) Clinicians can support self-efficacy by highlighting past successes, skills and strengths: increase hope, optimism and sense of competence Adapted from Naar-King & Suarez © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by 4 Principles of MI: Review 1. 2. 3. 4. Express Empathy Develop Discrepancy Roll with Resistance Support Self-Efficacy – All very important working with adolescents jameshasablog.wordpress.com © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by amber.rc.arizona.edu/modeling Skill Sets in MI Back to Basics © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by OARS Open-ended questions OARS is an acronym: Affirmations probably first encountered practicing microskills Reflections Summaries © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Open Ended Questions • Do you like closed-ended questions? • Do they elicit much information? • Do they convey much of an interest? • Are they sometimes necessary? • Are you tired of this scenario? • How do open-ended questions help increase relevant information? • How do they demonstrate more interest? • Are there other advantages to openended questions? • Can you ask too many open-ended questions? © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Practice: Open-Ended Questions ‘Client’ ‘Therapist’ “I came to see you today because ____________” Respond with 5 closedended questions Then: discuss how this process could have been improved with just one or two open-ended questions Consider: closed-ended questions v. open-ended questions working with an adolescent © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Affirmations MI is a strengths-based approach that supports self-efficacy – which instills hope about making difficult change. Affirmations recognize, validate and reinforce client strengths Affirmations must be congruent and genuine (think Rogers…) General ‘Atta-boys’ are obviously insincere and can damage rapport and promote knee-jerk disengagement: especially in youth © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Affirmations May be most effective with youth if the therapist drops the “I”: “I am very happy you have chosen to cut back on smoking cigarettes” VS “It is very impressive that you have made a decision to cut back on smoking” Affirmations should support strengths that are in the direction of change Can still acknowledge the difficulties the client has experienced Can be used to validate the client’s feelings and experiences © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Affirmations • “Wow, you’ve really thought a lot about this” • “With all of the obstacles you faced last week, it is so impressive that you are back here today” • “When you chose not to go to that party, that showed a lot of resolve” • “You showed resourcefulness and great strength helping your grandmother” © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Reflections (Reflective Listening) • This may be the foundation upon which all other skills are built 1. Clearly demonstrates the principle of Expressing Empathy – • Reflections have two purposes: Validates, conveys understanding, nonjudgmental 2. Provides guidance in the direction of change by identifying areas of ambivalence © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Reflections “So what I hear you saying is…” “You feel _____ when _____” • Exact or even slightly paraphrased repetition can sound stereotyped and even sarcastic – Reflections are hypotheses… This is an educated guess about what your client is saying: you are asking for clarification – but, form the reflection as a statement, not a question. If you are wrong – it is okay: the client will help clafify © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Reflections • Reflections help reduce the ‘interrogation’ feel for adolescents with the use of Open-Ended Questions: it is recommended all questions be sandwiched between reflections © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Reflection Sandwich YOU: ‘You are feeling worried that insisting your boyfriend wears a condom will make him mad or even suspicious (reflection). What do you predict he might say (Question)?’ CLIENT: ‘Well, he could say I don’t love him, or that I don’t trust him. He could even ask what I’ve been up to’ YOU: ‘You’re worried about his trust on a couple of fronts and also that he might think you don’t love him (reflection)’ © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Summaries • Summaries are BIG reflections • They ‘connect the dots’: may be very useful for helping youth better view connections • Help link feelings of ambivalence and promote recognition of discrepancies energyquest.cal.gov © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Roadblocks • Ordering, directing or commanding • Warning or even threatening • Giving advice, making suggestions or providing solutions • Persuading with logic • Moralizing, preaching • • • • Disagreeing Agreeing Shaming or ridiculing Reassuring or sympathizing • Distracting, humoring or even changing the subject © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by Exercise • For Dyads: Speaker – Identify a change you are considering – but have not decided to act on for sure (something you may have been putting off) Counselor – Try as hard as you can to convince and persuade the Speaker to go ahead and make this change. – Try: • Explain why they should change • Give benefits of the change • Tell them how to make the change • Emphasize how important it is to make this change • Tell/persuade them to do it © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by OARS: Review Open-ended questions Affirmations Reflections Summaries Client-centered skills Convey active listening Relate empathetic understanding Provide constant opportunity to guide the recognition of discrepancy Easily ‘go with the flow’ (resistance) Support self-efficacy © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by 4 Fundamental Processes in MI From Miller and Rollnick: Stockholm 2010 1. Engage The relational foundation: it is Person-Centered, emphasizes listening and understanding dilemmas and values *Learn this one first “If you don’t engage, you don’t get to go any farther” - Miller 2. Guide The strategic focus – brining things to a focus ‘focus on a change direction’ © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by 4 Fundamental Processes in MI From Miller and Rollnick: Stockholm 2010 3. Evoke “The Heart of MI”: this process represents the transition to MI. It utilizes: -selective eliciting -selective responding -selective summaries ‘Evoke from the client their own ideas about change’ 4. Plan The Bridge to Change Negotiating a change plan: a particular plan and the intention to engage in that plan © Center for Innovative Practices and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (2000 -2015). Use by