Dan Quan Ryan Kelly Greg Pisotti Once upon time…. There was a princess who kissed a lowly little frog who then became a prince. Familiar story right? After investigating into this mere children’s story, we have come up with a possible scientific explanation. As it turns out, upon kissing this frog the princess unknowingly ingested a potentially potent psychedelic toxin by the name of bufotenine. With the ingestion of this toxin, her slimy frog appeared to have transformed into what the princess perceived as a handsome prince. This is the story of bufotenine and how it could have possibly been the source of this well-known bedtime story… Many organisms have evolved the ability to produce toxins. One member of the toad family Bufo bufo gargarizans and another organism, a plant species known as Anedenathera colubrina. Robert Most led the movement with his pamphlet entitled Bufo alvarius: The Psychedelic Toad of the Desert. Chinese maps from Fei, L. 1999. Atlas of Amphibians of China Russian maps from Kuzmin, S.L. 1999. The amphibians of the former Soviet Union. Paratoid Gland Femoral Pores http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/43/B ufo_gargarizans_profile.jpg Ch’an su is a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) that is derived from the venom of various toad species. Eg: Bufo bufo gargarizans. Ch’an su was ingested orally or applied topically to reduce swelling and alleviate pain. Ch’an su is still known today as powerful aphrodisiac which can be applied topically to an area of interest. Also claims to “expel summer heat, open the orifices, and awaken the spirit” It acts as a CNS stimulant and exerts cardiopulmonary effects. Anadenanthera colubrina is a plant found mostly in South America and seen in early mesoamerican art. The people in Meso America used the beans of this plant, which contains high concentrations of bufotenine. Psychedelic snuff was then created by the inhabitants through a long process. • They would pop the beans like popcorn and ground them up with mortar and pestle. • The powder was then mixed with a lime and was moistened into a dough. • Bufotenine constitutes 12.4% of the substance and is the active ingredient. Shamans used to use snuff as ways to transcend this realm and enter another. A closely related compound to bufotenine has been shown to produce psychedelic effects in humans. The worship of this species, Bufo alvarious, resulted in the religious movement known as The Church of the Toad of Light. It also led to the a drug movement in the 1970’s commonly referred to as “Toad Licking” Toad licking is impractical and the real effects came from smoking extracted bufotenine, This is how you do it… Hold toad with one hand and with the thumb and forefinger of your other hand. Squeeze near the base of the gland until the venom squirts out the pores and onto a smooth pore-less surface, such as a glass plate. The venom is a milky-white in color when first squeezed from the glands. The substance is very viscous and begins to evaporate immediately, leaving behind the dried smokeable portion. Scrape off the substance and store in an airtight container until ready to smoke. tryptamine The DEA has classified tryptamines which are chemical compounds with the general structure in the above picture, and chemical similarity to the amino acid tryptophan, as schedule I hallucinogenic substances. Some tryptamines in this catergory are psilocybin (certain mushrooms), DMT (dimethyltryptamine, and our toxin that we are researching, bufotenine. Bufotenine as well as other tryptamines are labeled as schedule I hallucinogenic because “as pure chemicals at doses of 10 to 20 mg, these hallucinogens produce muscle relaxation, dilation of pupils, vivid visual and auditory distortions, and emotional disturbances” (DEA). psilocybin Dimethyltryptamine (Found In many plants) Drugs that are classified as schedule I are considered so because: • The drug or other substance has a high potential for abuse. • The drug or other substance has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States • There is a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug or other substance under medical supervision. (DEA) • Some well known schedule I substances are heroin, ecstacy, PCP, and marijuana. Two main receptors associated with causing a hallucinogenic response in an individual. They are named the 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors. It is believed that the “5-HT2A receptors may predominantly mediate the stimulus properties of hallucinogens, while the 5HT2C receptors play a modulatory role” (McBride 324). Bufotenine activity on these two receptors mimics results produced by known hallucigens LSD and 5-MeO-DMT proving that it does possess psychoactive abilities. Thus if bufotenine toxin is able to accumulate at a sufficient concentration in the brain, then it should elicit the same responses as LSD, 5-MeO-DMT, or psilocin (psychoactive mushrooms). It is well known that “a drug’s degree of lipid solubility generally correlates to ability to cross the BBB and other biological membranes if an active transport mechanism is lacking” (McBride 326). To measure the ability of a drug to cross the blood-brain barrier, partition coefficients are used. The coefficients are the ratio of concentration of a compound in two phases of a mixture of two immiscible solvents at equilibrium. The coefficients are thus a measure of solubility of the compound between two solvents. It has been proposed through research that a partition coefficient of 1.40 is the minimum required to activate a hallucinogenic response with 3.14 being the most optimum. Two known psychedelics, 5-Me0-DMT and psilocin have partition coefficients of 3.30 and 3.30, further supporting these two toxins ability to bring about a psychoactive response. Bufotenine on the other hand only has a partition coefficient of 0.06. This low number is the reason that scientists do not believe in the ability of bufotenine to produce hallucinogenic activity. •The exact mechanism of action of bufotenine still eludes scientists. •Unlike its very close relative 5-MeO-DMT, Bufotenine is a very polar compound. Because of its polarity, it has very low lipid solubility, and thus has difficulty crossing the Blood Brain Barrier. •With its inability to penetrate the Blood Brain Barrier effectively, it has been proposed that bufotenine cannot ilicit a psychoactive response. • • • • • It is not easy to do research into drugs of this category (schedule I) in the US, therefore many times American researchers must leave the country. The effects of “licking toads” or more generally ingesting bufotenine can have widely varying effects. As with any drug these effects vary from person to person. These effects can range from mostly physical to mildly or intensely hallucinogenic. Usage or prevalence in today’s society is low do to the more readily available substances that are much easier to obtain such as LSD or DMT, which can both have similar effects. There have been seven ways of ingesting this toxin that have been tested. Intranasal, intrarectal, sublingual, intravenous, intramuscularly, intraoral and vapor inhalation. Each of these various ways of ingesting bufotenine required a different dose to discern any “hallucinogenic” effects. • • • • • • • Intravenous: 1-16mg Intramuscular: 10-12.5 Intranasal: 40-100mg -yes this is a very large dose but it is what was discovered by John Ott while doing research in South America to cause a hallucinogenic effect Sublingual: 50mg before effects were felt Intra-orally: 100mg before effects were felt Vapor inhalation: 2-8 mg -arguably the most effective way of using the drug Intra-rectally: 50mg -this method has been used by shamans in native tribes of South America • • • • • • • • • Tests have shown that various responses to the toxin have been elicited. Most notably it almost always comes with some form of physiological symptom These can be a heavy feeling in the chest Shortness of breath A mild to intense purpling of the face Nausea/vomiting Increased heart rate Rarely have any of these symptoms, or any symptom of ingesting bufotenine proven to be fatal. Obviously it must be noted that “EVERYTHING IS TOXIC” and of coarse there is a dose that can be lethal but there is not enough research to discover the lethal dose • • • • • • In 1956 research was done on prisoners to determine the effects of injected bufotenine (Fabing) Each prisoner was given a different dose and saw a mildly different yet similar response Most reported some sort of “trip” in which they saw various colors or patterns. Some reported as though they were looking through literal “rose colored glasses” Colors appeared in front of their eyes in blotches Some saw patterns, such as lines or boxes on the walls of the room Most hallucinations involved some sort of color display. No reports of “people’s faces melting or sheep dancing” were noted. Meaning that the “trip” or hallucinogenic effect is relatively mild, when compared to other hallucinogens. With its inability to cross the blood-brain barrier through conventional methods, there must be another mechanism that allows for the reported psychoactive effects. “During periods of acute hypertension, the permeability of the BBB to a number of compounds is increased” (McBride 327). Therefore it is possible that when the blood-brain barrier is compromised, a partially effective dose is allowed to enter the brain along with the natural accumulation, which can cause a partial hallucinogenic response. More research needs to be done on the toxin, because in nature, the toxin is combined with other “bioactive ingredients such as in the Bufo toad toxin” (McBride 328). It has been researched that toad toxins and toad skins comprise of catecholamines such as epinephrine, and therefore the “potential effects of high concentrations of epinephrine and other vasopressors likewise cannot be omitted” (McBride 328). Therefore to truly test if the accounts of toad licking and toad skin smoking, or whether any other toxin application actually produced hallucinogenic responses, research needs to look past the toxin itself and its inability to penetrate the BBB. Researchers need to look at the compound bufotenine when it is mixed naturally in certain species of toads and plant species. Bufotenine has been used by ancient cultures for many centuries. It can been found in different organisms. Anecdotal evidence is the only “proof” that bufotenine elicits a hallucinogenic response. Even without conclusive scientific evidence behind the psychoactivity of bufotenine, the DEA realizes the danger behind its usage and has made it illegal. So in the end there is no limit to the means a princes will use in her search for a prince. The princess violated the law and after the effects wear off she will be left with nothing but a wart covered frog and a bad tasted in her mouth, or how ever she may chose to ingest the toxin. THIS COULD BE YOUR PRINCE NO FREE LUNCH!!! Brawley P., Duffield, J. The Pharmacology of Hallucinogens. 1972 Pharmacological Reviews. Vol. 24 No 1 Brian K. Roberts, DVM Michael G. Aronsohn, VMD, DACVS Bradley L. Moses, DVM, DACVIM Ronald L. Burk, DVM, MS, DACVR Jeffrey Toll, VMD, DACVIM Robert Weeren, DVM, MS, DACVS. Bufo marinus intoxication in dogs: 94 cases (1997-1998) June 2000. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association Vol 216. Issue: 12. Pages 1941-1944 Fabing, H. D., Hawkins R. J. Intravenous Bufotenine Injection in the Human Being. May 1956. Science. Vol. 123 Issue: 3203. Pages: 886-887 McBride, Michael C. “Bufotenine: Toward an Understanding of Possible Psychoactive Mechanisms.” Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. Jul-Sep 2000:32,3 McLeod W. R., Sitaram B.R., Bufotenine Reconsidered. 1985 Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Vol 72 Issue: 5 Pages: 447-450 Ott, Jonathon. 2001. “Pharmanopo-Pyschonautics: Human INtransal, Sublingual, Intrarectal, Pulmonary and Oral Phamacology of Bufotenine”. Retrieved from http://www.tacethno.com/info/bufotenine/pharmanopo.html Sandoroni, P. M.D. Ph.D. Aphrodisiacs Past and Present: a Historical Review 2000. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota, USA US Drug Enforcement Administration. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gov/dea/concern/psilocybin.html